First documentation of diversity of the Heteroptera of Cotton University Campus, Kamrup (Metropolitan), Assam, India

Main Article Content

Santana Saikia
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2274-947X
Anjana Singha Naorem
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7937-689X

Abstract

Cotton University, a developing university in Guwahati city of Kamrup district from Assam is undergoing a lot of developmental changes leading to a change in land use pattern which will have an impact on insect distribution. Heteroptera studies being severely lacking from this region needs attention for their documentation. A survey conducted on the campus from July 2018 to July 2019 every week between 0700–0900 h on all types of vegetation documented a total of 163 bugs of 20 different species under 10 families of Heteroptera. Pentatomidae was found to be the most dominant family with eight recorded species. Wild vegetation supported more diverse bug forms than the other garden plants. This survey is the first record of these insects from the Cotton University campus and such data forms an important database of available bugs from this region in the wake of the developmental changes the university is going through. Any change in their distribution, if found in the future, will reflect the impact of anthropogenic activities on their existence and distribution. Studies of this kind may be minuscule in level, but it forms an important record of their presence before we lose them to time.

Article Details

Section
Communications
Author Biographies

Santana Saikia, Department of Zoology, Cotton University, Pan Bazaar, Guwahati, Assam 781001, India

-

Anjana Singha Naorem, 1,2 Department of Zoology, Cotton University, Pan Bazaar, Guwahati, Assam 781001, India

-

References

Azim, M.N. (2011). Taxonomic survey of stink bugs (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) of India. Halteres 3: 1–10.

Distant, W.L. (1902). Fauna of the British India, Rhynchota Vol.-I (Heteroptera). Taylor and Francis, London, 490 pp. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.9193

Engelmann, H.D. (1973). Untersuchungen zur Erfassung predozoogener komponenten im definierten. Okosystem. Forschungen. Staatliches Museum fur Naturkunde, Gorlitz 575–584.

Fauvel, G. (1999). Diversity of Heteroptera in agroecosystems: role of sustainability and bioindication. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 74: 275–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00039-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-50019-9.50016-9

Halder, J., D. Kushwaha & A.B. Rai (2020). Biology and feeding potential of Eocanthecona furcellata (Wolff) on its lesser-known prey, Spilosoma obliqua (Walker). Journal of Biological Control 34(2): 109–112. https://doi.org/10.18311/jbc/2020/24829 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18311/jbc/2020/24829

Henry, T.J. (2017). Biodiversity of Heteroptera, pp. 279–335. In: Foottit, R.G. & P.H. Adler (eds.). Insect Biodiversity: Science and Society. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Oxford, United Kingdom, 867 pp. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118945568 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118945568.ch10

Jana, S., P.R. Pahari, T.K. Dutta & T. Bhattacharya (2009). Diversity and community structure of aquatic insects in a pond in Midnapore town, West Bengal, India. Journal of Environmental Biology 30(2): 283–287.

Kaur, H., S. Devinder & S. Vikas (2012). Faunal diversity of terrestrial Heteroptera (Insecta: Hemiptera) in Punjab, India. Journal of Entomological Research 36(2): 177–181.

Kruess, A. & T. Tscharntke (2000). Effects of habitat fragmentation on plant-insect communities, pp. 53–70. In: Ekbom, B., M.E. Irwin & Y. Robert (eds.). Interchanges of Insects Between Agricultural and Surrounding Landscapes. Springer, Dordrecht. 240 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1913-1_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1913-1_4

Kumar, A. (2014). The lace bug Cochlochila bullita (Stål), a destructive pest of Ocimum sanctum in Jharkhand, India. Phytoparasitica 42(3): 295–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-013-0359-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-013-0359-0

Margalef, R. (1958). Temporal succession and spatial heterogeneity in phytoplankton, pp. 323–347. In: Buzzati-Traverso (ed.). Perspectives in Marine Biology, University of California Press, Berkeley, 648 pp. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520350281-024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.8441698.27

Mitchell, P.L. (2004). Heteroptera as vectors of plant pathogens. Neotropical Entomology 33: 519–45. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-566X2004000500001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-566X2004000500001

Mouhoubi, D., R. Djenidi & M. Bounechada (2019). Contribution to the study of diversity, distribution, and abundance of insect fauna in salt wetlands of Setif region, Algeria. International Journal of Zoology 2019: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2128418 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2128418

Panizzi, A.R. (1997). Wild hosts of Pentatomids: ecological significance and role in their pest status on crops. Annual Review of Entomology 42: 99–122. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.42.1.99 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.42.1.99

Panizzi, A.R. & J. Grazia (2015). Introduction to True Bugs (Heteroptera) of the Neotropics, pp. 3–20. In: Panizzi, A.R., J. Grazia (eds.). True Bugs (Heteroptera) of the Neotropics. Vol. 2. Entomology in Focus, Springer, Dordrecht, 901 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9861-7_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9861-7_1

Pielou, E.C. (1966). Species-diversity and pattern-diversity in the study of ecological succession. Journal of Theoretical Biology 10(2): 370–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(66)90133-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(66)90133-0

Rider, D.A., C.F. Schwertner, J. Vilímová, D. Rédei, P. Kment & D.B. Thomas (2018). Higher systematics of the Pentatomoidea, pp. 25–204. In: McPherson, J.E. (ed.). Invasive Stink Bugs and Related Species (Pentatomoidea): Biology, Higher Systematics, Semiochemistry, and Management. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 819 pp. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315371221 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315371221-2

Salini, S. & C.A. Viraktamath (2015). Genera of Pentatomidae (Hemiptera: Pentatomoidea) from South India - an illustrated key to genera and checklist of species. Zootaxa 3924(1): 1–76. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3924.1.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3924.1.1

Schaefer, C.W. & A.R. Panizzi (eds.) (2000). Heteroptera of Economic Importance. CRC press, FL, 856 pp. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420041859 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420041859

Schaefer, C.W. (2013). True Bugs and Their Relatives, diversity of 287–295. In: Scheiner, S.M. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Biodiversity. 2nd Edition. Academic Press, US, 5504 pp. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-384719-5.00164-7

Schuh, R.T. & J.A. Slater (1995). Habitat and feeding types, pp 20–22. In: True Bugs of the World (Hemiptera: Heteroptera): Classification and Natural History. Cornell University press, Ithaca and London, 336 pp.

Shannon C.E. & W. Wiener (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, University of Illinois Press, 177 pp.

Simpson, E.H. (1949). Measurement of diversity. Nature 163(4148): 688. https://doi.org/10.1038/163688a0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/163688a0

Yumnam, J.Y. & N. Dey (2022). Biomass and Carbon Stock of Trees Growing in Cotton University, Guwahati, Assam, India. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological 92: 853–859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-022-01365-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-022-01365-z

Zhang, Y., J.L. Hanula & S. Horn (2012). The biology and preliminary host range of Megacopta cribraria (Heteroptera: Plataspidae) and its impact on kudzu growth. Environmental Entomology 41(1): 40–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1603/EN11231