Leaf nutrients of two Cycas L. species contrast among in situ and ex situ locations

Main Article Content

Thomas E. Marler
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7348-2632
Anders Lindstrom
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0419-9136

Abstract

An understanding of leaf nutrient relations is required for tree conservation and horticulture success.  The study of cycad leaf nutrient dynamics has expanded in recent years, but direct comparisons among reports remains equivocal due to varying sampling protocols.  We used Cycas micronesica K.D. Hill and Cycas nongnoochiae K.D. Hill trees to determine the influence on leaf nutrient concentrations of in situ versus ex situ locations and orientation of leaves within the tree canopy.  Nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium concentrations of leaves from ex situ plants exceeded those from in situ plants, and the differences were not explained by soil nutrient differences.  Calcium concentrations of leaves varied among the site pairs, with differences primarily explained by soil calcium.  Magnesium concentrations of leaves were not different among all location pairs even though soil magnesium concentrations varied among the sites more than any of the other elements.  Differences in leaf macronutrient concentrations among four C. micronesica provenances were minimal when grown in a common garden.  Lateral orientation of leaves did not influence any of the essential elements for either of the species.  These findings indicate that the lateral orientation of cycad leaves does not influence leaf nutrient concentrations, leaf nutrient relations of cycad plants in managed ex situ settings do not align with leaf nutrient relations in habitat, and these differences are not explained by soil nutrition for most elements.  We suggest that leaf nutrient concentrations should be determined in all niche habitats within the geographic range of a cycad species in order to fully understand the leaf physiology of each species. 

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
Marler, T.E. and Lindstrom, A. 2020. Leaf nutrients of two Cycas L. species contrast among in situ and ex situ locations. Journal of Threatened Taxa. 12, 13 (Sep. 2020), 16831–16839. DOI:https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.6205.12.13.16831-16839.
Section
Communications

Funding data

References

Álvarez-Yépiz, J.C., A. Cueva, M. Dovčiak, M. Teece & E.A. Yepez (2014). Ontogenetic resource-use strategies in a rare long-lived cycad along environmental gradients. Conservation Physiology: 2. https://doi.org10.1093/conphys/cou034.

Berghage, R.D., D.M. Krauskopf, D.D. Warncke & I. Widders (1987). Micronutrient testing of plant growth media extractant, identification and evaluation. Communications Soil Science and Plant Analysis 18: 1089–1109.

Cascasan, A.N. & T.E. Marler (2016). Publishing trends for the Cycadales, the most threatened plant group. Journal of Threatened Taxa 8: 8575–8582. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.2369.8.3.8575-8582 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.2369.8.3.8575-8582

Dumas, J.B.A. (1831). Procedes de L’analyse Organique. Annales de Chimie et de Physique 47: 198–205.

Fragniere, Y., S. Bétrisey, L. Cardinaux, M. Stoffel & G. Kozlowski (2015). Fighting their last stand? A global analysis of the distribution and conservation status of gymnosperms. Journal of Biogeography 42: 809–820.

Grove, T.S., A.M. O’Connell & N. Malajczuk (1980). Effects of fire on the growth, nutrient content and rate of nitrogen fixation of the cycad Macrozamia riedlei. Australian Journal of Botany 28: 271–281.

Han, W., J. Fang, D. Guo & Y. Zhang (2005). Leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry across 753 terrestrial plant species in China. New Phytologist 168: 377–385.

Hill, K.D. (1994). The Cycas rumphii complex (Cycadaceae) in New Guinea and the Western Pacific. Australian Systematic Botany 7: 543–567.

Hill, K.D. (2010). Cycas nongnoochiae. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2010: e.T42060A10616197. www.iucnredlist.org. Downloaded on 14 May 2020.

Hill, K.D. & S.-L. Yang (1999). The genus Cycas (Cycadaceae) in Thailand. Brittonia 51: 48–73.

Hou, X. & B.T. Jones (2000). Inductively coupled plasma/optical emission spectrometry, p. 9468–9485. In: Meyers, R.A. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, United Kingdom.

Hue, N.V., H. Ikawa & X. Huang (2000). Predicting soil phosphorus requirements, p. 95–99. In: Silva, J.A. & R. Uchida (eds.). Plant Nutrient Management in Hawaii’s Soils, Approaches for Tropical and Subtropical Agriculture. College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii, 158pp.

Killingbeck, K.T. (1996). Nutrients in senesced leaves: Keys to the search for potential resorption and resorption proficiency. Ecology 77: 1716–1727.

Krieg, C., J.E. Watkins, S. Chambers & C.E. Husby (2017). Sex-specific differences in functional traits and resource acquisition in five cycad species. AoB PLANTS 9: plx013. https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plx013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plx013

Lei, J.-P., W. Xiao, J.-F. Liu, D. Xiong, P. Wang, L. Pan, Y. Jiang & M.-H. Li (2013). Responses of nutrients and mobile carbohydrates in Quercus variabilis seedlings to environmental variations using in situ and ex situ experiments. PLoS ONE 8(4): e61192. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061192 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061192

Lü, X.-T., Y.‐Y. Hu, A.A. Wolf & X.‐G. Han (2019). Species richness mediates within‐species nutrient resorption: Implications for the biodiversity–productivity relationship. Journal of Ecology 107: 2346–2352.

Marler, T.E. (2013). Kin recognition alters root and whole plant growth of split-root Cycas edentata seedlings. HortScience 48: 1266–1269.

Marler, T.E. & M. Calonje (2020). Two cycad species affect the carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus content of soils. Horticulturae 6: 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae6020024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae6020024

Marler, T.E., N. Dongol & G.N. Cruz (2016). Plastic responses mediated by identity recognition in below-ground competition in Cycas micronesica K.D. Hill. Tropical Conservation Science 9: 648–657.

Marler, T.E. & U.F. Ferreras (2015). Disruption of leaf nutrient remobilization in coastal Cycas trees by tropical cyclone damage. Journal of Geography Natural Disasters 5: 142. https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0587.1000142 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0587.1000142

Marler, T.E. & U.F. Ferreras (2017). Current status, threats and conservation needs of the endemic Cycas wadei Merrill. Journal of Biodiversity Endangered Species 5: 193. https://doi.org/10.4172/2332-2543.1000193 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4172/2332-2543.1000193

Marler, T., J. Haynes & A. Lindström (2010). Cycas micronesica. IUCN 2012. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. e.T61316A12462113. www.iucnredlist.org. Downloaded on 14 May 2020.

Marler, T.E. & M.V. Krishnapillai (2018a). Does plant size influence leaf elements in an arborescent cycad? Biology 7: 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology7040051 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biology7040051

Marler, T.E. & M.V. Krishnapillai (2018b). Cycas micronesica trees alter local soil traits. Forests 9: 565. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9090565 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/f9090565

Marler, T.E. & M.V. Krishnapillai (2019a). Distribution of elements along the rachis of Cycas micronesica leaves: A cautionary note for sampling design. Horticulturae 5: 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae5020033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae5020033

Marler, T.E. & M.V. Krishnapillai (2019b). Incident light and leaf age influence leaflet element concentrations of Cycas micronesica trees. Horticulturae 5: 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae5030058 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae5030058

Marler, T.E. & A.J. Lindström (2018). Inserting cycads into global nutrient relations data sets. Plant Signaling & Behavior 13: e1547578. https://doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2018.1547578 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2018.1547578

Marler, T.E., A.J. Lindström & W. Field (2018). Range, density, and threatened status of Cycas nongnoochiae. Memoirs New York Botanical Garden 117: 86–94.

Norstog, K.J. & T.J. Nicholls (1997). The biology of the cycads. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, xi+363pp.

Olsen, S.R., C.V. Cole, F.S. Watanabe & L.A. Dean (1954). Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. United States Department of Agriculture Circular, 939.

Reich, P.B. & J. Oleksyn (2004). Global patterns of plant leaf N and P in relation to temperature and latitude. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101: 11001–11006.

Watanabe, T., M.R. Broadley, S. Jansen, P.J. White, J. Takada, K. Satake, T. Takamatsu, S.J. Tuah & M. Osaki (2007). Evolutionary control of leaf element composition in plants. New Phytologist 174: 516–523.

Zheljazkov, V.D. & P.R. Warman (2002). Comparison of three digestion methods for the recovery of 17 plant essential nutrients and trace elements from six composts. Compost Science & Utilization 10: 197–203.

Zhang, Y., K. Cao, L. Sack, N. Li, X. Wei & G. Goldstein (2015). Extending the generality of leaf economic design principles in the cycads, an ancient lineage. New Phytologist 206: 817–829.

Zhang, Y.-J., L. Sack, K.-F. Cao, X.-W. Wei, & N. Li (2017). Speed versus endurance tradeoff in plants: Leaves with higher photosynthetic rates show stronger seasonal declines. Scientific Reports 7: 42085; https://doi.org/10.1038/srep42085 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep42085

Zhang, Y.-J., L. Sack, G. Goldstein & K.-F. Cao (2018). Hydraulic determination of leaf nutrient concentrations in cycads. Memoirs New York Botanical Garden 117: 179–192.