Efficacy of 5% neem seed kernel extract against ectoparasites in six captive wildlife species at Rajiv Gandhi Zoological Park, India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.10042.18.6.29052-29066Keywords:
Acaricidal activity, alternative pest management, animal welfare, Azadirachta indica, Azadirachtin, botanical biopesticides, Katraj Zoo, parasite control in zoos, Pune, veterinary parasitologyAbstract
This wildlife study aimed to assess the prevalence of ectoparasites and evaluate the in vivo efficacy of a 5% Neem Seed Kernel Extract (NSKE) insecticide in captive wildlife species at Rajiv Gandhi Zoological Park and Wildlife Research Centre (RGZPWRC), Katraj, Pune, Maharashtra, India. Ectoparasites were collected non-invasively from six wildlife species, namely, Black Buck Antelope cervicapra, Spotted Deer Axis axis, Leopard Panthera pardus, Tiger Panthera tigris, Elephant Elephas maximus, and Sloth Bear Melursus ursinus using insect traps in animal shelters and night houses, alongside combing and visual inspection. A total of 865 ectoparasites were documented in the entire study duration of 19 days, of which, 662 ectoparasites were documented before and 203 after the application of 5% NSKE, each over a nine-day period. Flies comprised 93.99% of the total ectoparasites found (865) during the entire study, followed by lice at 5.55% and fleas at 0.46%. The overall relative prevalence was 76.53% pre-treatment and 23.47% post-treatment. By species, Black Buck showed the lowest relative prevalence at 6.24%, and Elephants the highest at 21.73%, with an average relative prevalence of 16.67%. Leopards, Tigers, and Elephants had values of 21.62%, 19.66%, and 21.73%, respectively. Taxonomically, flies represented 96.30% in Black Buck, 63.91% in Spotted Deer, 98.93% in Leopards, and 100% in both Elephants and Sloth Bears. The estimated prevalence exceeded 100% in some species due to multiple parasites per host based on average parasitic load calculations. During treatment, shelters and night houses were washed and sprayed with 5% NSKE. Re-sampling after nine days showed a marked reduction in ectoparasite counts. Efficacy of 5% NSKE against flies, fleas, and lice was 69.29%, 100%, and 66.67%, respectively, with an overall efficacy of 69.33% (P < 0.001) with a 95% confidence interval ranging from 65.70% to 72.90%. The highest efficacy was observed in Elephants at 81.76%. Use of 5% NSKE is hence strongly recommended as an insecticide or repellent in captive wild animal housing systems. These findings support the integration of botanical insecticides into integrated pest management programs for captive wildlife.
References
Akhtar, Y. & M.B. Isman (2013). Plant natural products for pest management: the magic of mixtures, pp. 231–246. In: Ishaaya, I., S.R. Palli & A.R. Horowitz (eds.). Advanced Technologies for Managing Insect Pests. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 415 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4497-4_11
Albarrán-Rodríguez, E., P.D.R. Quezada, M.R. Cortés, G.N. Rodríguez, L.G. Delgado, G.R. Cano & H.M.C. Alba (2019). Effect of a 5% neem solution on the presence of ticks in cattle in two locations in Jalisco, Mexico. Open Journal of Veterinary Medicine 9: 185–193. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojvm.2019.912016
Aldridge, R.L., S.C. Britch, S.A. Allan, M. Tsikolia, L.C. Calix, U.R. Bernier & K.J. Linthicum (2016). Comparison of volatiles and mosquito capture efficacy for three carbohydrate sources in a yeast-fermentation CO₂ generator. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 32(4): 282–291. https://doi.org/10.2987/16-6609.1
Boeke, S.J., M.G. Boersma, G.M. Alink, J.J. van Loon, A. van Huis, M. Dicke & I.M. Rietjens (2004). Safety evaluation of Neem Azadirachta indica derived pesticides. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 94(1): 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2004.05.011
Cotticelli, A., R. Matera, N. Piscopo, A. Bosco, S. Claps, P.D. Serrone, A. Zoratti, E. Castaldo, V. Veneziano, D. Rufrano, G. Neglia & F. Buono (2023). Efficacy and safety of neem oil for the topical treatment of bloodsucking lice Linognathus stenopsis in goats under field conditions. Animals 13(15): 2541. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13152541
Dharaiya, N., H.S. Bargali & T. Sharp (2020). Melursus ursinus (amended version of 2016 assessment). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2020: e.T13143A166519315. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2020-1.RLTS.T13143A166519315.en
Duckworth, J.W., N.S. Kumar, M.A. Islam, H.S. Baral & R. Timmins (2015). Axis axis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2015: e.T41783A22158006. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2015-4.RLTS.T41783A22158006.en
Eads, D.A., D.E. Biggins, M.F. Antolin, D.H. Long, K.P. Huyvaert & K.L. Gage (2015). Prevalence of the generalist flea Pulex simulans on Black-tailed Prairie Dogs Cynomys ludovicianus in New Mexico, USA: the importance of considering imperfect detection. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 51(2): 498–502. https://doi.org/10.7589/2014-07-178
Gaurava, K. & N. Singh (1999). Sarcoptic mange in lions Panthera leo at Bikaner Zoo. Zoos’ Print 14(5): 28.
George, D.R., R.D. Finn, K.M. Graham & O.A. Sparagano (2014). Present and future potential of plant-derived products to control arthropods of veterinary and medical significance. Parasites & Vectors 7: 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-28
Gibb, T.J. & C.Y. Oseto (2019). Insect Collection and Identification: Techniques for the Field and Laboratory, 2nd Edition. Academic Press, London, xiii + 339 pp.
Griffiths, H.J. (1978). A Handbook of Veterinary Parasitology: Domestic Animals of North America. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, vii + 248 pp.
Goodrich, J., H. Wibisono, D. Miquelle, A.J. Lynam, E. Sanderson, S. Chapman, T.N.E. Gray, P. Chanchani & A. Harihar (2022). Panthera tigris. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2022: e.T15955A214862019. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2022-1.RLTS.T15955A214862019.en
Islam, S. (2010). Infestation of Leopard Cat Prionailurus bengalensis with cat flea Ctenocephalides felis felis. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 107(1): 61.
Isman, M.B. (2006). Botanical insecticides, deterrents, and repellents in modern agriculture and an increasingly regulated world. Annual Review of Entomology 51(1): 45–66. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.151146
IUCN SSC Antelope Specialist Group (2017). Antilope cervicapra. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017: e.T1681A50181949. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2017-2.RLTS.T1681A50181949.en
Klepeckienė, K., J. Radzijevskaja, I. Ražanskė, J. Žukauskienė & A. Paulauskas (2020). The prevalence, abundance, and molecular characterization of Lipoptena deer keds from cervids. Journal of Vector Ecology 45(2): 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvec.12392
Krasnov, B.R. (2008). Functional and Evolutionary Ecology of Fleas: A Model for Ecological Parasitology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, xiii + 593 pp.
Kreutzweiser, D.P., R.C. Back, T.M. Sutton, K.L. Pangle & D.G. Thompson (2004). Aquatic mesocosm assessments of a neem (azadirachtin) insecticide at environmentally realistic concentrations—2: zooplankton community responses and recovery. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 59(2): 194–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2003.09.008
Lehmann, T. (1994). Reinfestation analysis to estimate ectoparasite population size, emergence, and mortality. Journal of Medical Entomology 31(2): 257–264. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmedent/31.2.257
McCallum, H. & A. Dobson (1995). Detecting disease and parasite threats to endangered species and ecosystems. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 10(5): 190–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(00)89050-3
Miller, R.E. & M.E. Fowler (eds.) (2014). Fowler’s Zoo and Wild Animal Medicine. Vol. 8. Elsevier Health Sciences, London, 792 pp.
Moudgil, A.D. & L.D. Singla (2021). Scanning electron microscopy based identification of ectoparasitic insects infesting zoo-housed jungle cats and pigeons of north India. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science 41(4): 3263–3267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42690-021-00458-y
Moudgil, A.D., L.D. Singla & Pallavi (2015). Parasitosis in wild felids of India: an overview. Journal of Threatened Taxa 7(10): 7641–7648. https://doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.o4236.7641-8
Narladkar, B.W. (2018). Projected economic losses due to vector and vector-borne parasitic diseases in livestock of India and its significance in implementing the concept of integrated practices for vector management. Veterinary World 11(2): 151–160. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2018.151-160
Nashiruddullah, N. & A. Chakraborty (2001). Parasites of captive wild carnivores of Assam State Zoo. Intas Polivet 2(1): 173–181.
Oliver, G.V. & R.P. Eckerlin (2022). Fleas (Siphonaptera) from the puma, Puma concolor (Carnivora: Felidae), a rangewide review and new records from Utah and Texas, USA. Journal of Medical Entomology 59(6): 2045–2052. https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjac119
Rózsa, L., J. Reiczigel & G. Majoros (2000). Quantifying parasites in samples of hosts. Journal of Parasitology 86: 228–232. https://doi.org/10.2307/3284760
Razali, N.B., N. Shamsudin, R.A. Mohd Jobran, S. Yaakop, J.J. Khoo & F.S. Mohd-Taib (2018). Ectoparasites (ticks and mites) prevalence on small to medium-sized mammals associated with habitat condition in Kemasul, Pahang. Serangga 23(1): 1–15. https://ejournal.ukm.my/serangga/article/view/24159
Sarkar, P., K. Bhattacharjee & P. Patel (2012). Ectoparasitic load on Blackbuck Antilope cervicapra in a wildlife sanctuary of Gujarat, India. Tropical Parasitology 2(1): 60–62.
Samuel, W.M., M.J. Pybus & A.A. Kocan (eds.) (2001). Parasitic Diseases of Wild Mammals, 2nd Edition. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA, xix + 630 pp. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470377000
Schilling, A.-K., M.V. Mazzamuto & C. Romeo (2022). A review of non-invasive sampling in wildlife disease and health research: what’s new? Animals 12(13): 1719. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12131719
Schoenthal, C.A. (2015). Monitoring and management of Culicoides spp. (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) in white-tailed deer Odocoileus virginianus production facilities in Texas, USA. Ph.D. Dissertation. Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA. https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/155114
Shivakumar, S., A. Khettry, N. Surve, H. Rahman, Y. Ghimirey, L. Tharchen, T. Zaw, M. Waseem & Y.V. Jhala (2025). Panthera pardus ssp. fusca (amended version of 2024 assessment). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2025: e.T215195524A274969627. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2025-1.RLTS.T215195524A274969627.en
Smallegange, R.C., W.H. Schmied, K.J. van Roey, N.O. Verhulst, J. Spitzen, W.R. Mukabana & W. Takken (2010). Sugar-fermenting yeast as an organic source of carbon dioxide to attract the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae. Malaria Journal 9: 292. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-9-292
Smith, A., B. Krasnov, I. Horak, E. Ueckermann & S. Matthee (2023). Ectoparasites associated with the Bushveld Gerbil Gerbilliscus leucogaster and the role of the host and habitat in shaping ectoparasite diversity and infestations. Parasitology 150: 792–804. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182023000562
Soulsby, E.J.L. (1982). Helminths, Arthropods and Protozoa of Domesticated Animals, 7th Edition. Baillière Tindall, London, 809pp.
Sukumaran, D., S. Ponmariappan, A.K. Sharma, H.K. Jha, Y.H. Wasu & A.K. Sharma (2016). Application of biogenic carbon dioxide produced by yeast with different carbon sources for attraction of mosquitoes towards adult mosquito traps. Parasitology Research 115: 1453–1462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-015-4879-z
Stark, J.D. (2001). Population-level effects of the neem insecticide, Neemix, on Daphnia pulex. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B 36(4): 457–465. https://doi.org/10.1081/PFC-100104189
Steinmetz, R., M. Garshelis & T. Frederick (2023). Melursus ursinus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. International Union for Conservation of Nature, Gland, Switzerland.
Stein, A.B., L. Bertola, V. Qashqaei Atani, A. Ghoddousi, S. Khorozyan, J. Kiabi, S. Farhadinia, J. Hunter, J. Laguardia & H. Wibisono (2025). Panthera pardus (amended version of 2024 assessment). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2025: e.T15954A274970607. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2025-1.RLTS.T15954A274970607.en
Tabassam, S.M., Z. Iqbal, A. Jabbar, Z.U.D. Sindhu & A.I. Chattha (2008). Efficacy of crude neem seed kernel extracts against natural infestation of Sarcoptes scabiei var. ovis. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 115(2): 284–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2007.10.003
Webb, E.C. & M. David (2002). The efficacy of neem seed extract (Azadirachta indica) to control tick infestation in Tswana, Simmentaler and Brahman cattle. South African Journal of Animal Science 32(1): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v32i1.3784
Williams, C., S.K. Tiwari, V.R. Goswami, S. de Silva, A. Kumar, N. Baskaran, K. Yoganand & V. Menon (2020). Elephas maximus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2020: e.T7140A45818198. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2020-3.RLTS.T7140A45818198.en
Zajac, A.M., G.A. Conboy, S.E. Little & M.V. Reichard (2021). Veterinary Clinical Parasitology, 9th Edition. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, New Jersey, USA, 432 pp.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 S.B. Kendre, P.D. Pawar, R.V. Jadhav, U.M. Tumlam, A.Y. Doiphode, V.G. Nimbalkar, P.K. Bhangale, V.C. Priyal, S.M. Meshram

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors own the copyright to the articles published in JoTT. This is indicated explicitly in each publication. The authors grant permission to the publisher Wildlife Information Liaison Development (WILD) Society to publish the article in the Journal of Threatened Taxa. The authors recognize WILD as the original publisher, and to sell hard copies of the Journal and article to any buyer. JoTT is registered under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which allows authors to retain copyright ownership. Under this license the authors allow anyone to download, cite, use the data, modify, reprint, copy and distribute provided the authors and source of publication are credited through appropriate citations (e.g., Son et al. (2016). Bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) of the southeastern Truong Son Mountains, Quang Ngai Province, Vietnam. Journal of Threatened Taxa 8(7): 8953–8969. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.2785.8.7.8953-8969). Users of the data do not require specific permission from the authors or the publisher.


