Avian composition and distribution in the bird sanctuary planning zone of Can Gio Mangrove Biosphere Reserve, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.9940.17.11.27889-27896Keywords:
Can Gio, waterbirds, avifauna, mangrove forestAbstract
Six field surveys were conducted from July 2024 to May 2025 in six sessions (three during dry and three during wet seasons) along 10 fixed transects (five in the core zone and five in the buffer zone) to assess the bird species composition and spatial distribution in the bird sanctuary planning zone of the Can Gio Mangrove Biosphere Reserve, after 47 years of restoration (1978–2025). A total of 57 bird species, representing 11 orders, 32 families, and 45 genera were recorded, including 18 waterbird species. Four species are listed as threatened and prioritized for conservation by the IUCN Red List: Porzana paykullii as Near Threatened, Vietnam Red List Book: Anhinga melanogaster and Mycteria leucocephala as Vulnerable, and Vietnamese law: Milvus migrans and Anhinga melanogaster as prioritized for conservation. The order Passeriformes was the most species-rich (21 species), while Pelecaniformes had the highest number of individual encounters (2,427). Overall, bird diversity in the area was relatively high (Shannon-Wiener index H’ = 2.60 ± 0.34), with a moderate level of dominance (Simpson D = 0.12 ± 0.06). Species abundance was uneven across seasons and transects, with higher diversity and abundance during the wet season, although the differences were not statistically significant. Only the transect L8 in the buffer zone showed statistically significant differences in diversity and abundance, representing a newly recorded breeding area dominated by waterbird species such as Nycticorax nycticorax, Egretta garzetta, Ardea intermedia, and Microcarbo niger. Compared to a 2019 study, the number of breeding species in the core zone declined to seven species with approximately 1,000 individuals, while a new breeding area in the buffer zone was identified with eight breeding species and approximately 1,500 individuals. Continuous monitoring and conservation efforts are necessary to sustain and manage avian biodiversity in this critical wetland ecosystem.
References
Avibase (2025). Bird checklists - taxonomy - distribution - maps - links. https://avibase.bsc-eoc.org/avibase.jsp?lang=EN. Accessed on iv.2025.
Byju, H., H. Maitreyi, N. Raveendran & R. Vijayan (2024). Avifaunal diversity assessment and conservation significance of Therthangal Bird Sanctuary, Ramanathapuram, Tamil Nadu: insights about breeding waterbirds. Journal of Threatened Taxa 16(9): 25802–25815. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.8999.16.9.25802-25815
Byju, H., H. Maitreyi, R. Natarajan, R. Vijayan & B.A.V. Maran (2025a). The avifauna of Ramanathapuram, Tamil Nadu along the southeast coast of India: waterbird assessments and conservation implications across key sanctuaries and Ramsar sites. PeerJ 13: e18899. http://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.18899
Byju, H., H. Maitreyi, K.M. Aarif & N. Raveendran (2025b). Disappearing colonies: temporal decline in abundance and nesting of waterbirds in a key Indian wetland. Wetlands Ecology and Management 33: 47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-025-10067-y
Byju, H., H. Maitreyi, N. Raveendran, S. Ravichandran & R. Vijayan (2025c). Avifaunal diversity and conservation status of waterbirds in Pillaimadam Lagoon, Palk Bay, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 17(4): 26789–26802. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.9432.17.4.26789-26802
Can Gio District Forest Protection Management Board (2025). Overview of Can Gio Mangrove Biosphere Reserve. https://rungngapmancangio.org/. Electronic version accessed on 14.iv.2025.
Chairman of Ho Chi Minh City People’s Committee (2004). Decision No. 27/QD-UB dated January 6, 2004 on approving the zoning of wild birds and animals in Can Gio protective forest. 3pp. (in Vietnamese).
Huynh, D.H., N.T.K. Bui, V.T. Phan, N.H. Dang & N.N. Vien (2019). Current status of bird biodiversity in Vam Sat bird sanctuary in Can Gio Mangrove Biosphere Reserve. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development 1: 69–74.
IUCN (2025). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2025-1. https://www.iucnredlist.org/en. Electronic version accessed on 14.iv.2025.
King, B., M. Woodcock & E.C. Dickinson (1997). Birds of South-East Asia. Collins Field Guide series, 480pp.
Koshiyama, Y. & T. Asano (2019). Birds living in Can Gio. Nam Du Association, 28 pp.
Le, B.T. (2021). Summary report of scientific and technological results of the project Research on building a mechanism and model of cooperation between tourism development and sustainable conservation of biodiversity in Can Gio Biosphere Reserve, 462 pp.
Le, M.H. (2020). Birds of Vietnam. Nha Nam Publishing House, 822 pp.
McAleece, N., J.D.G. Gage, P.J.D. Lambshead & G.L.J. Paterson (1997). BioDiversity Professional Statistics Analysis Software. Jointly developed by the Scottish Association for Marine Science and the Natural History Museum London.
Ministry of Science and Technology (2007). Vietnam Red List Book, Part I. Animals. Natural Science and Technology Publishing House, Hanoi, 516 pp. (in Vietnamese)
Nguyen, C., T.K. Le & K. Phillipps (2000). Birds of Vietnam. Labor. Social Publishing House, Hanoi, 408 pp.
Nguyen, M.C. (2009). Textbook of Statistics in Forestry. Ho Chi Minh City University of Agriculture and Forestry, 223 pp.
Prime Minister of Vietnam (2019). Decree No. 06/2019/ND-CP dated January 22, 2019 on the management of endangered, precious and rare forest plants and animals and the implementation of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, 87 pp.
Prime Minister of Vietnam (2021). Decree No. 84/2021/ND-CP dated September 22, 2021 amending and supplementing a number of articles of Decree No. 06/2019/ND-CP dated January 22, 2019 of the Government on the management of endangered, precious and rare forest plants and animals and the implementation of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, 34 pp.
Shannon, C.E. & W. Wiener (1963). The Mathematical Theory of Communities. Illinois: Urbana University, Illinois Press, 131 pp.
Simpson, E.H. (1949). Measurement of diversity. Nature 163: 688.
Tran, V.B. (2020). Biodiversity in Vietnam: Current status and conservation challenges. Journal of Science and Life 05: 57–61.
Vietnam Wildlife Photography Club (2025). Birds of South East Asia. https://www.birdwatchingvietnam.net/. Accessed on 14.iv.2025.
Vo, Q. (1981). Morphology and Classification of Vietnamese birds, Volume II. Science and Technology Publishing House, 394 pp.
Yamaura, Y., H. Schmaljohann, S. Lisovski, M. Senzaki, K. Kawamura, Y. Fujimaki & F. Nakamura (2017). Tracking the Stejneger’s stonechat Saxicola stejnegeri along the East Asian - Australian Flyway from Japan via China to southeast Asia. Journal of Avian Biology 48: 197–202.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 27-11-2025 (2)
- 26-11-2025 (1)
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Huynh Duc Hieu, Huynh Duc Hoan, Bui Nguyen The Kiet, Dang Ngoc Hiep, Nguyen Thi Phuong Linh, Nguyen Dang Hoang Vu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors own the copyright to the articles published in JoTT. This is indicated explicitly in each publication. The authors grant permission to the publisher Wildlife Information Liaison Development (WILD) Society to publish the article in the Journal of Threatened Taxa. The authors recognize WILD as the original publisher, and to sell hard copies of the Journal and article to any buyer. JoTT is registered under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which allows authors to retain copyright ownership. Under this license the authors allow anyone to download, cite, use the data, modify, reprint, copy and distribute provided the authors and source of publication are credited through appropriate citations (e.g., Son et al. (2016). Bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) of the southeastern Truong Son Mountains, Quang Ngai Province, Vietnam. Journal of Threatened Taxa 8(7): 8953–8969. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.2785.8.7.8953-8969). Users of the data do not require specific permission from the authors or the publisher.
