Analysis revealed minuscule DNA sequence data availability for Indian marine macroalgal diversity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.9679.18.2.28343-28349Keywords:
AlgaeBase, aquaculture, bioprospecting, conservation, DNA barcoding, GenBank, genetic resources, molecular systematics, species identification, taxonomyAbstract
Seaweeds hold immense economic potential due to multifarious applications in pharmaceuticals and everyday products. India’s 11,099 km coastline harbours a rich diversity of seaweeds in the Indian Ocean. Identifying seaweeds based on morphology is challenging due to high phenotypic and reproductive plasticity, so DNA barcoding is often used. This initiative marks the first national effort to compile relevant scientific information on DNA barcoding of Indian marine macroalgae, the current-status of knowledge and the scope for study. Despite decades of molecular research on Indian macroalgae, the resulting sequence data remain scattered across online repositories without systematic integration or quality assessment. The study is a comprehensive analysis of current barcode coverage of Indian seaweeds available on GenBank. With 207 unique sequences, only 11% of total Indian macroalgal diversity has been studied yet. The priority gaps that demonstrate direct benefits such as accurate taxonomic identification, cultivation strain authentication, and assessment of invasive species and surveillance of algal blooms, and indirect benefits like policy support, conservation planning, reference libraries for eDNA, training, and capacity building were identified. We consider that DNA barcoding at the national level would not only help in the sustainable commercial utilisation of economically important species but also in the conservation of endemic taxa. This is identified as a major research gap. It needs to be addressed through concentrated efforts by national research organisations and universities, ascertaining the availability of adequate infrastructure, and focused efforts on capacity building. A comprehensive and collaborative research program is urgently needed at the Pan-India level.
References
Armstrong, K.F. & S.L. Ball (2005). DNA barcodes for biosecurity: invasive species identification. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 360: 1813–1823. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1713
Bhushan, S., R. Mehra, P. Rani & F. Bast (2016). DB IndAlgae: an on-line resource of marine algae from India identified on the basis of molecular and morphological features. Current Science 111(4): 723 –726.
Chac, L.D. & B.B. Thinh (2023). Species identification through DNA barcoding, and its applications: a review. Biology Bulletin 50(6): 1143–1156. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106235902360229X
Duarte, C.M., A. Bruhn & D. Krause-Jensen (2022). A seaweed aquaculture imperative to meet global sustainability targets. Nature Sustainability 5(3): 185–193. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00773-9
FAO (2022). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2022: Towards Blue Transformation. FAO, Rome, Italy, 266 pp.
GenBank (2024). National Institute of Health, National Centre for Biotechnology Information. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore. Accessed on 7.vi.2024.
Guiry, M.D. & G.M. Guiry (2024). AlgaeBase: Listing the world’s algae. AlgaeBase. https://www.algaebase.org/. Accessed on 7.vi.2024.
Hebert, P.D., A. Cywinska, S.L. Ball & J.R. deWaard (2003). Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings Biological Sciences 270(1512): 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2218
Hofmann, L.C., J. Brakel, I. Bartsch, G.M. Arismendi, R. Bermejo, M.I. Parente &T. Wichard (2025). A European biobanking strategy for safeguarding macroalgal genetic material to ensure food security, biosecurity and conservation of biodiversity. European Journal of Phycology 60(2): 197–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670262.2025.2480569
Hollingsworth, P.M., L.L. Forrest, J.L. Spouge, M. Hajibabaei, S. Ratnasingham, M. VanDerBank & M.W. Chase (2009). A DNA barcode for land plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106(31): 12794–12797. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0905845106
Kowalska, Z., F. Pniewski & A. Latała (2019). DNA barcoding – A new device in phycologist’s toolbox. Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology 19(3): 417–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecohyd.2019.01.002
Lagourgue, L., S. Gobin, M. Brisset, S. Vandenberghe, C. Bonneville, T. Jauffrais, S.V. Wynsberge & C.E. Payri (2022). Ten new species of Ulva (Ulvophyceae, Chlorophyta) discovered in New Caledonia: genetic and morphological diversity, and bloom potential. European Journal of Phycology 57(4): 458–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670262.2022.2027023
Leliaert, F., D.R. Smith, H. Moreau, M.D. Herron, H. Verbruggen, C.F. Delwiche & O. DeClerck (2012). Phylogeny and Molecular Evolution of the Green Algae. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 31(1): 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2011.615705
Mantri, V.A., V. Veeragurunthan, K. Sambhwani & A.M. Kazi (2022a). Concise review of industrially important red seaweed Gracilaria dura (C. Agardh) J. Agardh. Journal of Applied Phycology 34(4): 1825–1841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-022-02755-6
Mantri, V.A., A. Ghosh, K. Eswaran & M. Ganesan (2022b). Notes on recommendations for enabling policy interventions in the seaweed cultivation and processing domain in India. Sustainability 14(16): 10416. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610416
Mantri, V.A., M.G. Kavale & M.A. Kazi (2020). Seaweed biodiversity of India: Reviewing current knowledge to identify gaps, challenges, and opportunities. Diversity 12(1): 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/d12010013
Mishra, P., A. Kumar, G. Sivaraman, A.K. Shukla, R. Kaliamoorthy, A. Slater & S. Velusamy (2017). Character-based DNA barcoding for authentication and conservation of IUCN Red listed threatened species of genus Decalepis (Apocynaceae). Scientific Reports 7: 14910. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14887-8
Pandey, L.K., K.K. Ojha, P.K. Singh, C.S. Singh, S. Dwivedi & E.A. Bergey (2016). Diatoms image database of India (DIDI): a research tool. Environmental Technology & Innovation 5: 148–160.
Rajauria, G., L. Cornish, F. Ometto, F.E. Msuya & R. Villa (2015). Identification and selection of algae for food, feed, and fuel applications (pp. 315–345). In: Brijesh K.T. & D.J. Troy (eds.). Seaweed Sustainability. Academic Press, 470 pp. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-418697-2.00012-X
Rao, P. & R. Gupta (2015). A Checklist of Indian Marine Algae (excluding Diatoms & Dinoflagellate). Botanical Survey of India, Ministry of Environment, Forests & Climate Change, Kolkata, India, 93 pp.
Rao, P.S. & V.A. Mantri (2006). Indian seaweed resources and sustainable utilization: Scenario at the dawn of new century. Current Science 91(2): 164–174. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24094208
Rathod, S.G., M.A. Kazi & V.A. Mantri (2023). Molecular evidence to support the transfer of Enteromorpha ovata to genus Ulva and evaluate its divergence using multi-locus time-calibrated phylogeny. Nordic Journal of Botany 2023(12): e04103. https://doi.org/10.1111/njb.04103.
Sahoo, D. (2001). Seaweeds of Indian Coast. APH Publication Corporation, New Delhi, 276 pp.
Saunders G.W. (2005). Applying DNA barcoding to red macroalgae: a preliminary appraisal holds promise for future applications. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B Biological sciences 360(1462): 1879–1888. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1719
Saunders G.W. & D.C. McDevit (2014). A DNA barcode survey of Haida Gwaii kelp (Laminariales, Phaeophyceae) reveals novel ecological and distributional observations and Saccharina druehlii sp. nov. Botany 92(11): 821–826. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjb-2014-0119
Sharma, P., P. Patil, N. Rao, K.V. Swamy, M.B. Khetmalas & G.D. Tandon (2013). Algal Database—Bioprospecting indigenous algae for industrial application. Indian Journal of Biotechnology 12: 548–549.
Wirawan, I.G.P., M.M.V. Sasadara, I.N. Wijaya & A.A.K. Krinandika (2021). DNA barcoding in molecular identification and phylogenetic relationship of beneficial wild Balinese red algae, Bulung sangu (Gracilaria sp.). Bali Medical Journal 10(1): 82–88. https://doi.org/10.15562/bmj.v10i1.2093
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Digvijay Singh Yadav, Aswin Alichen, Vaibhav A. Mantri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors own the copyright to the articles published in JoTT. This is indicated explicitly in each publication. The authors grant permission to the publisher Wildlife Information Liaison Development (WILD) Society to publish the article in the Journal of Threatened Taxa. The authors recognize WILD as the original publisher, and to sell hard copies of the Journal and article to any buyer. JoTT is registered under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which allows authors to retain copyright ownership. Under this license the authors allow anyone to download, cite, use the data, modify, reprint, copy and distribute provided the authors and source of publication are credited through appropriate citations (e.g., Son et al. (2016). Bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) of the southeastern Truong Son Mountains, Quang Ngai Province, Vietnam. Journal of Threatened Taxa 8(7): 8953–8969. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.2785.8.7.8953-8969). Users of the data do not require specific permission from the authors or the publisher.
