Evaluating wildlife activity and corridor functionality: a study of underpasses in and around Rajaji National Park, India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.9621.17.4.26780-26788Keywords:
Asian Elephant, Camera Trap, Monitoring, habitat restoration, time activity pattern, linear infrastructure, Anthropogenic disturbanceAbstract
Habitat fragmentation threatens biodiversity, making wildlife corridors vital for maintaining ecological connectivity. This study evaluated the functionality of three corridors—Chilla-Motichur, Teenpani, and Laltappar—in and around Rajaji National Park, Uttarakhand, India. We deployed camera traps at these corridors and surrounding forest areas for 8,198 trap nights to monitor the wildlife use of the corridors. We recorded 17 species of wild animals in the connected forested area and nine within the corridors. The Wild Pig Sus scrofa and Sambar Rusa unicolor were the most frequently captured species, with the highest Relative Abundance Index (RAI) in the Teenpani corridor. Activity patterns of wild species showed changes in the corridor compared to forest areas. Chital Axis axis exhibited continuous activity in corridors but an early-morning peak in forests (Δ = 0.68). Asiatic Elephant Elephas maximus shifted from daytime activity in forests to nocturnal peaks in corridors, likely avoiding human presence (Δ = 0.48). Sambar avoided daytime activity in the corridor compared to activity in the forest (Δ = 0.55), while Wild Pig maintained nocturnal peaks across both habitats (Δ = 0.71). Human activity, primarily diurnal, overlapped with Chital (Δ = 0.61) and increased potential encounters with Elephants and Leopards during evening hours (Δ = 0.25 and 0.39, respectively). Mitigation measures, such as habitat restoration and managing anthropogenic activities, are crucial for strengthening corridor functionality. The recent reintroduction of tigers in western Rajaji underscores the importance of these corridors for species connectivity and genetic exchange. This study provides valuable insights into managing wildlife corridors in human-dominated landscapes, highlighting their role in biodiversity conservation.
References
Benítez‐López, A., R. Alkemade & P. Verweij (2010). The impacts of roads and other infrastructure on mammal and bird populations: a meta-analysis. Biological Conservation 143: 1307–1316. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOCON.2010.02.009
Burkart, S., F. Gugerli, J. Senn, R. Kuehn & J. Bolliger (2016). Evaluating the functionality of expert-assessed wildlife corridors with genetic data from roe deer. Basic and Applied Ecology 17(1): 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2015.09.001
Callens, T., P. Galbusera, E. Matthysen, E.Y. Durand, M. Githiru, J.R. Huyghe & L. Lens (2011). Genetic signature of population fragmentation varies with mobility in seven bird species of a fragmented Kenyan cloud forest. Molecular Ecology 20: 1829–1844. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05028.x
Carvalho, F., S. Santos, A. Mira & R. Lourenço (2017). Methods to Monitor and Mitigate Wildlife Mortality in Railways, pp. 23–42. In: Borda-de-Água, L., R. Barrientos, P. Beja & H. Pereira (eds.). Railway Ecology. Springer, Cham, xxx + 320 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57496-7_3
Chakraborty, P., J. Borah, P. Bora, P., S. Dey, T. Sharma & S. Rongphar (2021). Camera trap based monitoring of a key wildlife corridor reveals opportunities and challenges for large mammal conservation in Assam, India. Tropical Ecology 62: 186–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42965-020-00138-x
Champion, H.G. & S.K. Seth (1968). A Revised Survey of the Forest Types of India. Manager of publications, 404 pp.
Dahya, M.N., R. Chaudhary, A. Shah & A. Kazi (2023). Assemblage, relative abundance and activity pattern of wild mammals in the human-dominated landscape of Vansda Taluka, Gujarat, India. Mammalia 87(5): 434–441. https://doi.org/10.1515/mammalia-2022-0130.
Dutta, T., S. Sharma & R. DeFries (2018). Targeting restoration sites to improve connectivity in a tiger conservation landscape in India. PeerJ 6: e5587. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5587
Gilhooly, P., S. Nielsen, J. Whittington & C. St. Clair (2019). Wildlife mortality on roads and railways following highway mitigation. Ecosphere 10(2): e02597. https://doi.org/10.1002/ECS2.2597
Haddad, N., L.A. Brudvig, J. Clobert, K.F. Davies, A. Gonzalez, R.D. Holt, T.E. Lovejoy, J.O. Sexton, M.P. Austin, C.D. Collins, W.M. Cook, E.I. Damschen, R.M. Ewers, B.L. Foster, C.N. Jenkins, A.J. King, W.F. Laurance, D.J. Levey, C.R. Margules, B.A. Melbourne, A.O. Nicholls, J.L. Orrock, D. Song & J.R. Townshend (2015). Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems. Science Advances 1: e1500052. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500052
Harihar, A. & B. Pandav (2012). Influence of connectivity, wild prey and disturbance on occupancy of tigers in the human-dominated western Terai Arc landscape. PLoS ONE 7(7): e40105. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040105
Holderegger, R. & M. Di Giulio (2010). The genetic effects of roads: a review of empirical evidence. Basic and Applied Ecology 11(6): 522–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2010.06.006
Jhala, Y.V., Q. Qureshi & R. Gopal (2015). Status of Tigers in India, 2014. National Tiger Conservation Authority and Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, India, 460 pp.
Johnsingh, A.J.T., K. Ramesh, Q. Qureshi, A. David, S.P. Goyal, G.S. Rawat, K. Rajapandian & S. Prasad (2004). Conservation Status of Tiger and Associated Species in the Terai Arc Landscape, India. Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, India, viii + 110 pp.
Katlam, G., S. Prasad, M. Aggarwal & R. Kumar (2018). Trash on the menu. Current Science 115(12): 2322–2326.
Kumar, K.A., Q. Qureshi & Y.V. Jhala (2023). Impact of human activities on wild ungulates in Nagarjunsagar Srisailam Tiger Reserve, Andhra Pradesh, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 15(5): 23147–23163. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.8145.15.5.23147-23163
Laurance, W.F., G.R. Clements, S. Sloan, C.S. O’Connell, N.D. Mueller, M. Goosem, O. Venter, D.P. Edwards, B. Phalan, A. Balmford & A. van Der Ree (2014). A global strategy for road building. Nature 513(7517): 229–232. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13717
Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MOEFCC) (2017). India’s National Wildlife Action Plan (2017–2031). Government of India. https://ntca.gov.in/assets/uploads/Reports/Others/Wildlife_Action_Plan_2017_31.pdf Downloaded on 22 March 2025.
Napolitano, S., D. Díaz, J. Sanderson, W.E. Johnson, K. Ritland, C.E. Ritland & E. Poulin (2015). Reduced genetic diversity and increased dispersal in Guigna Leopardus guigna in Chilean Fragmented landscapes. Journal of Heredity 106(S1): 522–536. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esv025
Niedballa, J., R. Sollmann, A. Courtiol & A. Wilting (2016). camtrapR: an R package for efficient camera trap data management. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 7(12): 1457–1462. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12600
Nigam, P., S. Mondol, B. Habib, N. Lakshminarayanan & J. Das (2022). Quantitative Assessment of Animal Movement Through Newly Commissioned Wildlife Underpasses at the Chilla-Motichur and Kansrao-Barkot Corridors in the Rajaji Landscape, Uttarakhand. Wildlife Institute of India-Uttarakhand Forest Department, Dehradun, India, 30 pp.
Olson, D.M. & E. Dinerstein (1998). The Global 200: A representation approach to conserving the earth’s most biologically valuable ecoregions. Conservation Biology 12(3): 502–515.
O’Brien, T.G. (2011). Abundance, Density, and Relative Abundance: A Conceptual Framework, pp. 71–96. In: O’Connell, A.F., J.D. Nichols & K.U. Karanth (eds.). Camera Traps in Animal Ecology: Methods and Analyses. Springer, New York, 271 pp.
Oro, D., M. Genovart, G. Tavecchia, M.S. Fowler & A. Martínez‐Abraín (2013). Ecological and evolutionary implications of food subsidies from humans. Ecology Letters 16(12): 1501–1514.
Palei, H., T. Pradhan, H. Sahu & A. Nayak (2021). Diet and activity pattern of leopard in relation to prey in tropical forest ecosystems. Mammalia 88(1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1515/mammalia-2021-0003.
Rajawat, R., & S. Chandra (2020). Activity Pattern of Chital (Axis axis) in Mukandra Hills Tiger Reserve, India. International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences 46: 173–176.
Ridout, M.S. & M. Linkie (2009). Estimating overlap of daily activity patterns from camera trap data. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics 14: 322–337. https://doi.org/10.1198/jabes.2009.08038
R Core Team (2024). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.
Times of India (2024). Fourth Tiger to be Translocated from Corbett to Rajaji Reserve. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/dehradun/fourth-tiger-to-be-translocated-from-corbett-to-rajaji-reserve-dehradun/articleshow/108417305.cms. Accessed on 04 January 2025.
van der Ree, R., J.A. Jaeger, E.A. van der Grift & A.P. Clevenger (2015). Effects of roads and traffic on wildlife populations and landscape function: Road ecology is moving toward larger scales. Ecology and Society 20(2): 1–15.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nishant Verma, Saket Badola, Samrat Mondol

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors own the copyright to the articles published in JoTT. This is indicated explicitly in each publication. The authors grant permission to the publisher Wildlife Information Liaison Development (WILD) Society to publish the article in the Journal of Threatened Taxa. The authors recognize WILD as the original publisher, and to sell hard copies of the Journal and article to any buyer. JoTT is registered under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which allows authors to retain copyright ownership. Under this license the authors allow anyone to download, cite, use the data, modify, reprint, copy and distribute provided the authors and source of publication are credited through appropriate citations (e.g., Son et al. (2016). Bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) of the southeastern Truong Son Mountains, Quang Ngai Province, Vietnam. Journal of Threatened Taxa 8(7): 8953–8969. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.2785.8.7.8953-8969). Users of the data do not require specific permission from the authors or the publisher.





