Tree cover and built-up area regulate the territory size in Eurasian Magpie Pica pica in Ladakh, India
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Eurasian Magpie Pica pica is one of the well-studied corvids, but the majority of our understanding of this species is from Europe. In India, its distribution is restricted to some valleys of Ladakh such as the northwestern part of the Indus, Nubra, Zanskar, Drass, and Suru. The present study aimed at understanding the territorial behavior of this species in small urban settlements of Ladakh region. Twenty-five pairs were studied in March 2020–April 2021. Territories were outlined for each color-banded individual, and data on habitat variables (namely built-up, agriculture, and green cover) was extracted. Generalized linear mixed models were used to study the effect of the habitat structure on territory size. The territory size (Mean ± SD) was 0.042 ± 0.025 km2, with tree cover comprising the highest proportion (24.36 ± 15.41 %) of area within territories. Built-up area was a feature of all territories, highlighting the affinity of magpies towards human presence. Presence of tree cover and built-up area significantly (~ <0.002) reduced territory size. High adaptability, foraging, and nesting opportunities, and protection from predators have been recognized as the reasons for magpies’ affinity with human habitation. Foraging opportunities are minimal outside human settlements in this region, magpies’ territories are largely shaped by the fulfilment of foraging requirements.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors own the copyright to the articles published in JoTT. This is indicated explicitly in each publication. The authors grant permission to the publisher Wildlife Information Liaison Development (WILD) Society to publish the article in the Journal of Threatened Taxa. The authors recognize WILD as the original publisher, and to sell hard copies of the Journal and article to any buyer. JoTT is registered under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which allows authors to retain copyright ownership. Under this license the authors allow anyone to download, cite, use the data, modify, reprint, copy and distribute provided the authors and source of publication are credited through appropriate citations (e.g., Son et al. (2016). Bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) of the southeastern Truong Son Mountains, Quang Ngai Province, Vietnam. Journal of Threatened Taxa 8(7): 8953–8969. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.2785.8.7.8953-8969). Users of the data do not require specific permission from the authors or the publisher.
References
Alcock, J. (2009). Animal behavior, 9th Edition. Sinauer Publishers, Massachusetts, USA, 546 pp. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icp058
Antonov, A. & D. Atanasova (2002). Nest-site selection in the Magpie Pica pica in a high-density urban population of Sofia (Bulgaria). Acta Ornithologica Journal 37: 55–66. https://doi.org/10.3161/068.037.0201
Antonov, A. & D. Atanasova (2003). Small -scale differences in the breeding ecology of urban and rural Magpies Pica pica. Ornis Fennica 80: 21–30.
Baeyens, G. (1979). Description of the social behaviour of the Magpie (Pica pica). Ardea 67: 28–41.
Benmazouz, I., J. Jokimäki, S. Lengyel, L. Juhász, M.L. Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki, G. Kardos, P. Paládi, & L. Kövér (2021). Corvids in Urban Environments: A Systematic Global Literature Review. Animals 11(3226): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11113226
Birkhead, T.R. (1991). The Magpies: The ecology and behaviour of Black-billed and Yellow-billed Magpies. Academic Press, Massachusetts, USA, 272 pp.
Croci, S., A. Butet & P. Clergeau (2008). Does urbanization filter birds on the basis of their biological traits? Condor 110: 223–240. https://doi.org/10.1525/cond.2008.8409
Dhindsa, M.S. & D.A. Boag (1991). Patterns of nest site, territory, and mate switching in black-billed magpies (Pica pica). Canadian Journal of Zoology 70: 633–640. https://doi.org/10.1139/z92-095
Eden, S.F. (1987). The social organization of non-breeding Magpies Pica pica. Ibis 131: 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.1989.tb02753.x
Flockhart, D.T., G. Mitchell, R. Krikun & E. Bayne (2016). Factors driving territory size and breeding success in a threatened migratory songbird, the Canada Warbler. Avian Conservation and Ecology 11(2): 1–34. https://doi.org/10.5751/ACE-00876-110204
Fox J. & S. Weisberg (2019). An R companion to applied regression, 3rd edition. Thousand Oaks, SAGE Publications Inc, California,USA, 608 pp.
Jokimäki, J., J. Suhonen, T. Vuorisalo, L. Kövér & M.L. Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki (2017). Urbanization and nest-site selection of the Black-billed Magpie (Pica pica) populations in two Finnish cities: From a persecuted species to an urban exploiter. Landscape and Urban Planning 157: 577–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.08.001
Jones, J. (2001). Habitat selection studies in avian ecology: a critical review. Auk 118: 557–562. https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/118.2.557
Juárez, R., E. Chacón-Madrigal, & L. Sandoval (2020). Urbanization has opposite effects on the territory size of two passerine birds. Avian Research 11(1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40657-020-00198-6
Kautz, J.E. & T.W. Seamans (1992). Techniques for feral pigeon trapping, tagging and nest monitoring. North American Bird Bander 17 (2): 53–59.
Khan, I.A., A. Kumar & D. Bhatt (2022). Breeding biology of Eurasian Magpie, Pica pica bactriana in Kargil region of Ladakh, India. Journal of Experimental Zoology, India 25: 529–534.
Khan, I.A., A. Kumar & D. Bhatt (2022). Seasonal variations in the flocking behaviour of Eurasian Magpie Pica pica in Ladakh, India. Journal of Experimental Zoology, India 25: 2509–2514.
Kuznetsova, A., P.B. Brockhoff & R.H.B. Christensen (2015). Package ‘lmertest’. R package version, 2(0), p.734.
Moller, A.P. (1982). Characteristics of Magpie Pica pica territories of varying duration. Ornis Scand 13: 94–100. https://doi.org/10.2307/3676195
Moller, A.P. (1985). Communal roosting in the Magpie (Pica pica). Journal of Ornithology 126: 405–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01643405
Nakahara, T., M. Kuroe, O. Hasegawa, Y. Hayashi, S. Mori & K. Eguch (2015). Nest site characteristics of the newly established Eurasian Magpie Pica pica population in Hokkaido, Japan. Ornithological Science 14: 99–109. https://doi.org/10.2326/osj.14.99
Newton, I. (2010). The migration ecology of birds. Elsevier, Academic Press, San Diego, USA, 984 pp.
Phillips, J.N., W.J. Cooper, D.A. Luther & E.P. Derryberry (2020). Territory Quality Predicts Avian Vocal Performance Across an Urban-Rural Gradient. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 8: 587120. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2020.587120
Reese, K.P. & J.A. Kadlec (1985). Influence of high density and parental age on the habitat selection and reproduction of black billed magpies. Condor 87: 96–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/1367140
Šálek, M., S. Grill, & J. Riegert (2020). Nest-site selection of an avian urban exploiter, the Eurasian magpie Pica pica, across the urban-rural gradient. Journal of Vertebrate Biology 70(1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.25225/jvb.20086
Skorupski, J., Ł. Jankowiak, B. Kiriaka, T. Rek & D. Wysocki (2018). Beech forest structure and territory size of four songbird species in Puszcza Bukowa, NW Poland: implications for bird-friendly silvicultural practices in a temperate forest. Ethology Ecology & Evolution 30(2): 128–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/03949370.2017.1329232
Takeishi, M. & K. Egughi (1994). Nest-site Characteristics in the Black-billed Magpies Pica pica sericea. Japanese Journal of Ornithology 42: 53–59. https://doi.org/10.3838/jjo.42.53
Tatner, P. (1982). Factors influencing the distribution of magpies Pica pica in an urban environment. Bird Study 29: 227–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/00063658209476763
Vogrin, M. (1998). Density and flock size of the Magpie Pica pica on the agricultural landscape during winter period. Ornis Svecica 8: 167–170. https://doi.org/10.34080/os.v8.22941
Wang, Y., S. Chen, P. Jiang & P. Ding (2008). Black-billed Magpies (Pica pica) adjust nest characteristics to adapt to urbanization in Hangzhou, China. Canadian Journal of Zoology 86(7): 676–684. https://doi.org/10.1139/Z08-045