Habitat selection of Himalayan Musk Deer Moschus leucogaster (Mammalia: Artiodactyla: Moschidae) with respect to biophysical attributes in Annapurna Conservation Area of Nepal

Main Article Content

Bijaya Neupane
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1215-689X
Nar Bahadur Chhetri
Bijaya Dhami
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4127-138X

Abstract

Himalayan or White-bellied Musk Deer Moschus leucogaster, an IUCN indexed endangered species, is distributed in isolated pockets in the Himalaya. The deer population is decreasing owing to several pressures that include habitat loss and fragmentation, and poaching. It is essential to identify preferred habitat characteristics to support appropriate management strategies for conserving this endangered species. This study was carried out in the Nysheang basin of Annapurna Conservation Area of Nepal to identify habitats preferred by the musk deer. Habitat field parameters were collected using transect surveys. To analyze vegetation use and availability, nested quadrate plots size 20 m2 were established. Ivlev’s electivity index (IV) (-1 to +1) was employed to determine habitat preference, and one-way ANOVA (F) and chi-square tests (χ2) were used to examine different habitat parameters. Similarly, the importance value index (IVI) of the vegetation was calculated. Our results showed that the Himalayan Musk Deer strongly preferred habitats at 3601–3800 m altitude (IV= 0.3, F= 4.58, P <0.05), with 21–30º slope (IV= 0.2, F= 4.14, P <0.05), 26–50 % crown cover (IV= 0.25, F= 4.45, P <0.05), 26–50 % ground cover (IV= 0.15, F= 4.13, P <0.05), and mixed forest (IV= 0.29, χ2= 28.82, df= 3, p <0.001). Among the trees, Abies spectabilis (IVI= 74.87, IV= 0.035) and Rhododendron arboretum (IVI= 55.41, IV= 0.02) were the most preferred, while Rhododendron lepidotum, Cassiope fastigiata (IV= 0.35) and Berberis aristata (IV= 0.25) were the most preferred shrubs, and Primula denticulata (IV= 0.87) and Primula rotundifolia (IV= 0.31) were the most preferred herbs. These preferred habitat conditions should be maintained and conserved to sustain a viable population of deer in the study area. Further studies will be required to assess the effects of climate change on habitat suitability. 

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
Neupane, B., Chhetri, N.B. and Dhami, B. 2021. Habitat selection of Himalayan Musk Deer Moschus leucogaster (Mammalia: Artiodactyla: Moschidae) with respect to biophysical attributes in Annapurna Conservation Area of Nepal. Journal of Threatened Taxa. 13, 7 (Jun. 2021), 18703–18712. DOI:https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.6725.13.7.18703-18712.
Section
Communications
Author Biography

Bijaya Dhami, Tribhuvan University, Institute of Forestry, Pokhara Campus, Kaski, 33700, Nepal.

 

References

ANCA (2018). An Assessment of status, distribution and habitat preferenece of Himalayan Musk Deer (Moschus Chrysogaster) in Api Nampa Conservation Area (ANCA). (A Case Study of Byas Rural Municipality). Submitted by: Peoples’ Help Group Dadhikot-9, Bhaktapur, 66pp. Downloaded on 9 June 2021 . http://ancadarchula.gov.np/media/download_attachment/final_report_Musk_deer.pdf

Aryal, A. & A. Subedi (2011). The conservation and potential habitat of the Himalayan Musk Deer Moschur Chrysogaster in the protected areas of Nepal. International Journal of Conservation Science 2: 127–141.

Awasti, A., S.K. Uniyal, G.S. Rawat & S. Sathyakumar (2003). Food plants and feeding habits of Himalayan ungulates. Current Science 85: 719–723.

Bhuju, U.R., P.R. Shakya, T.B. Basnet & S. Shrestha (2007). Nepal Biodiversity Resource Book: Protected Areas, Ramsar Sites, and World Heritage Sites. International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development Ministry of Environment, Science and Technology, Government of Nepal in cooperation with United Nations Environment Programme, Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, 161pp.

Boroski, B.B., R.H. Barrett, I.C. Timossi & J.G. Kie (1996). Modelling habitat suitability for black-tailed deer (Odocoileus hemionus columbianus) in heterogeneous landscapes. Forest Ecology and Management 88: 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(96)03821-2

Boyce, M.S. & L.L. McDonald (1999). Relating populations to habitats using resource selection functions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 14: 268–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01593-1

DNPWC (2016). The annual report. Department of National Park and Wildlife Conservation, Ministry of Forest and Environment, Government of Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal.

Elith, J. & J.R. Leathwick (2009). Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 40: 677–697. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120159

Futuyma, D.J. & G. Moreno (1988). The evolution of ecological specialization. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 19: 207–233.

Gaillard, J.M., M. Hebblewhite, A. Loison, M. Fuller, R. Powell, M. Basille & B. van Moorter (2010). Habitat–performance relationships: finding the right metric at a given spatial scale. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 365: 2255–2265. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0085

GoN (1973). National Parks and Wildlife Conservation Act. Nepal Law Commission, Kathmandu, Nepal.

Green, M.J. (1986). The distribution, status and conservation of the Himalayan Musk Deer Moschus chrysogaster. Biological Conservation 35: 347–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(86)90094-7

Green, M.J.B. & B. Kattel (1997). Musk Deer: little understood, even its scent. Paper presented at: The first international symposium on endangered species used in traditional East Asian Medicine: substitutes for tiger bone and musk; December 7–8; Hong Kong, 5pp.

Grubb, P. (2005). Artiodactyla. Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference, 637–722pp.

Harris, R. (2016). IUCN Red List of threatened species. Version 2020.1. www.iucnredlist.org Downloaded on 9 June 2020.

Hebblewhite, M. & E.H Merrill (2009). Trade‐offs between predation risk and forage differ between migrant strategies in a migratory ungulate. Ecology 90: 3445–3454. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-2090.1

Ilyas, O. (2015). Status, habitat use and conservation of Alpine Musk Deer (Moschus chrysogaster) in Uttarakhand Himalayas, India. Journal of Applied Animal Research 43: 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2014.899495

Ivlev, V.S. (1961). Experimental Ecology of the Feeding of Fishes. University Microfilms, 302pp.

Jaenike, J. & R.D. Holt (1991). Genetic variation for habitat preference: evidence and explanations. The American Naturalist 137: 67–90.

Jnawali, S.R., H.S. Baral, S. Lee, N. Subedi, K.P. Acharya, G.P. Upadhaya, M. Pandey, R. Shrestha, D. Joshi, B.R. Lamichhane, J. Friffiths & A.P. Khatiwada (2011). The Status of Nepal’s Mammals: The National Red List Series. Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation, Kathmandu, Nepal, 266pp.

Kattel, B. (1993). Ecology of the Himalayan Musk Deer in Sagarmatha National Park, Nepal. PhD thesis. Colorado State University, USA.

Kattel, B. & A.W. Alldredge (1991). Capturing and handling of the Himalayan Musk Deer. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 19: 397–399.

Khadka, K.K. & D.A. James (2016). Habitat selection by endangered Himalayan Musk Deer (Moschus chrysogaster) and impacts of livestock grazing in Nepal Himalaya: Implications for conservation. Journal for Nature Conservation 31: 38–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2016.03.002

Krebs, C.J. (1989). Ecological Methodology. Harper and Row, New York, USA.

Li, X., W.V. Bleisch & X. Jiang (2016). Effects of ethnic settlements and land management status on species distribution patterns: a case study of endangered Musk Deer (Moschus Spp.) in Northwest Yunnan, China. PLoS One 11(5): e0155042. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155042

Manly, B.F.L., L. McDonald, D.L. Thomas, T.L. McDonald & W.P. Erickson (2007). Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies. Springer Science & Business Media.

McLoughlin, P.D., T. Coulson & T. Clutton-Brock (2008). Cross‐generational effects of habitat and density on life history in red deer. Ecology 89: 3317–3326. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-1044.1

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: biodiversity synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.

Panthi, S., A. Aryal, D. Raubenheimer, J. Lord & B. Adhikari (2012). Summer diet and distribution of the Red Panda (Ailurus Fulgens Fulgens) in Dhorpatan Hunting Reserve, Nepal. Zoological Studies 51(5): 701–709.

Pulliam, H.R. & B.J. Danielson (1991). Sources, sinks, and habitat selection: a landscape perspective on population dynamics. The American Naturalist 137: 50–66.

Satyakumar, S., G.S. Rawat & A.J.T. Johnsingh (2015). Order Artiodactyla, Family Moschidae Evolution, Taxonomy and Distribution. Mammals of South Asia 2(1): 159–175.

Shrestha, B.B. (2012). Communal pellet deposition sites of Himalayan Musk Deer (Moschus chrysogaster) and associated vegetation composition. Master’s Thesis, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Norway.

Shrestha, B.B. & X. Meng (2014). Spring habitat preference, association and threats of Himalayan Musk Deer (Moschus leucogaster) in Gaurishankar Conservation Area, Nepal. International Journal of Conservation Science 5: 535–546.

Singh, P.B., B.B. Shrestha, A. Thapa, P. Saud & Z. Jiang (2018a). Selection of latrine sites by Himalayan Musk Deer (Moschus leucogaster) in Neshyang Valley, Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal. Journal of Applied Animal Research 46: 920–926. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2018.1430578

Singh, P.B, P. Saud, D. Cram, K. Mainali, A. Thapa, N.B. Chhetri, L.P. Poudyal, H.S. Baral & Z. Jiang (2018b). Ecological correlates of Himalayan Musk Deer Moschus leucogaster. Ecology and Evolution 9: 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4435

Singh, P.B., J.R. Khatiwada, P. Saud & Z. Jiang (2019). mtDNA analysis confirms the endangered Kashmir Musk Deer extends its range to Nepal. Scientific Reports 9: 4895. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41167-4

Smith, R.L. (1980). Ecology and Field Biology. Harper Collins, New York, 311pp.

Srivastava, T. & A. Kumar (2018). Seasonal habitat use in three species of wild ungulates in Sikkim Himalaya. Mammalian Biology 88(1): 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2017.11.013

Thapa, A., Y. Hu & F. Wei (2018). The endangered red panda (Ailurus fulgens): Ecology and conservation approaches across the entire range. Biological Conservation 220: 112–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.02.014

Thapa, M.T., S. Bhandari, K. Ghimire & D.R. Bhusal (2019). Threats to endangered Musk Deer (Moschus chrysogaster) in the Khaptad National Park, Nepal. Folia Oecologica 46: 170–173. https://doi.org/10.2478/foecol-2019-0020

Timmins, J. & J.W. Duckworth (2015). Moschus leucogaster. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2015; e.T13901A61977764. Downloaded on 09 June 2021. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2015-2.RLTS.T13901A61977764.en