A study on diversity of mammalian species using camera traps and associated vegetation in Mizoram University Campus, Aizawl, Mizoram

Main Article Content

J.H. Zothanpuii
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2173-9520
Sushanto Gouda
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5117-683X
Abinash Parida
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8472-764X
G.S. Solanki

Abstract

Fragmented forests often have conservation value, serving as a refuge or corridors for small mammalian species.  In the study, the diversity of mammals was studied within Mizoram University (MZU) campus.  Forty-eight plant species from 25 families were recorded on different sites.  Thirty quadrates were nested at the locations of occurrence of mammalian species for vegetation type analysis.  Schima wallichi was the most dominant plant species with the highest IVI values of (31.7%), followed by Aporosa octandra (22.93%) and Castanopsis tribuloide (21.17%).  Camera trap method was used to collect information about the mammalian diversity in the campus.  The mammalian species recorded in this study makes 15% of mammalian fauna of the state of Mizoram.  Twelve mammal species and six bird species were recorded by the camera traps.  With proper awareness among residents of the campus and a planned approach for developmental activities, the findings of our study can make an important extension for the coexistence of mammalian species and long term survivability within MZU campus.

Article Details

Section
Communications

References

Ahmed, A. (2012). Analysis of forest vegetation in Ranikhet, Kumaon Himalayas, Uttarakhand, India. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences 2(4): 16–23.

Baruah, P. (2017). Diversity of butterflies in Mizoram University campus, Aizawl. MSc dissertation submitted to Mizoram University. India.

Brncic, T., B. Amarasekaran, A. McKenna, R. Mundry & H.S. Kuhl (2015). Large mammal diversity and their conservation in the human-dominated land-use mosaic of Sierra Leone. Biodiversity Conservation 24: 2417–2438.

Choudhury, A. (2006). Notable bird records from Mizoram in north-east India. Forktail 22: 152–155.

Daniels, R.J.R., J. Venkatesan & C. Anuradha (1996). Biodiversity indexing in AgricultureLandscapes to species. M.S. 5waminathan Research Foundation, Chennai. FAO/UNDP.PER CENT 43.

Fernández, I.C. & J.A. Simonetti (2013). Small mammal assemblages in fragmented shrublands of urban areas of Central Chile. Urban Ecosystems 16: 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-012-0272-1

Gallo, T., M. Fidino, E.W. Lehrer & S.B. Magle (2017). Mammal diversity and meta-community dynamics in urban green spaces: Implications for urban wildlife conservation. Ecological Applications 27(8): 1–12.

Geldmann, J., M. Barnes, L. Coad, I.D. Craigie, M. Hockings & N.D. Burgess (2013). Effectiveness of terrestrial protected areas in reducing habitat loss and population declines. Biological Conservation 161: 230–238.

Gouda, S., N.S. Chauhan, J. Sethy & H.K. Sahu (2020). Daily activity pattern of Malayan Sun bear in Dampa Tiger Reserve, Mizoram, India. Journal of Wildlife and Biodiversity 4(2): 56–64.

Hill, M.J., J. Biggs, I. Thornhill, R.A. Briers, M. Ledger, D.G. Gledhill, P.J. Wood & C. Hassall (2018). Community heterogeneity of aquatic macro-invertebrates in urban ponds at a multi-city scale. Landscape Ecology 33: 389–405.

Jenks, K.E., P. Chanteap, K. Damrongchainarong, P. Cutter, T. Redford, A.J. Lynam, J. Howard & P. Leimgruber (2011). Using relative abundance indices from camera-trapping to test wildlife conservation hypotheses - an example from KhaoYai National Park, Thailand. Tropical Conservation Science 4: 113–131.

Kelly M.J., A.J. Noss, M. Di-Bitetti, L. Maffei, R.L. Arispe, A. Paviolo, C. De Angelo & Y.E. Di Blanco (2008). Estimating Puma densities from camera trapping across three study sites: Bolivia, Argentina, and Belize. Journal of Mammalogy 89(2): 408–418.

Lalramenga, P.C. (2006). Studies on plant diversity of undisturbed forest in Mizoram University campus, Tanhril. M.Sc. dissertation submitted to Mizoram University, India.

Lalthanzara, H. (2017). A systematic list of mammals of Mizoram, India. Science Vision 17(2): 104–121.

Lalthafamkima, K. (2017). Study on diversity of spiders inside Mizoram University campus, Aizawl, Mizoram. MSc dissertation submitted to Mizoram University, India.

Lalchhuanawma (2008). Ecological studies on plant diversity and productivity of herbaceous species in Mizoram university campus at Tanhril, Aizawl, Mizoram (N.E. India). PhD Thesis. Submitted to Mizoram University, India.

Linkie, M. & M.S. Ridout (2011). Assessing tiger-prey interactions in Sumatran rainforest. Journal of Zoology 284(3): 224–229.

Lopucki, R. & I. Kitowski (2017). How small cities affect the biodiversity of ground-dwelling mammals and the relevance of this knowledge in planning urban land expansion in terms of urban wildlife. Urban Ecosystem 20: 933–943.

Lopucki, R., I. Mroz, Ł.B. Ski & M. Burzych (2013). Effects of urbanization on small-mammal communities and the population structure of synurbic species: an example of a medium-sized city. Canadian Journal of Zoology 91: 554–561.

Mazumdar, K., R. Soud & A. Gupta (2011). Mammalian diversity of degraded forest habitats around Assam University Campus, Cachar, Assam, India, with notes on conservation status. Our Nature 9: 119–127.

Nerlekar, A.N., A.M. Warudkar, G.G. Gowande, S.S. Salve, A. Raut, S.R. Patankar & S.B. Nalavade (2016). A review of the faunal diversity of the Fergusson College campus, Pune, India. Zoo’s Prints 29(10): 4–25.

Opdam, P., J. Verboom & R. Pouwels (2003). Landscape cohesion: an index for the conservation potential of landscapes for biodiversity. Landscape Ecology 18: 113–126.

Ordenana, M.A., K.R. Crooks, E.E. Boydston, R.N. Fisher, L.M. Lyren, S. Siudyla, C.D. Haas, S. Harris, S.A. Hathaway, G. M. Turschak, A.K. Miles & D.H. van Vuren (2010). Effects of urbanization on carnivore species distribution and richness. Journal of Mammalogy 91(6): 1322–1331. https://doi.org/10.1644/09-MAMM-A-312.1

Rai, P.K. (2016). Biodiversity of roadside plants and their response to air pollution in an Indo-Burma hotspot region: implications for urban ecosystem Restoration. Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity 9: 47–55.

Sailo, L., G.S. Solanki & C. Lalhruaizela (2019). Avian diversity in Mizoram University Campus, Aizawl, Mizoram. Science and Technology Journal 7(1): 54–68.

Sasidhran, S., N. Adila, M.S. Hamdan, L. Samantha, D. Aziz, N. Kamarudin & B. Azhar (2016). Habitat occupancy patterns and activity rate of native mammals in tropical fragmented peat swamp reserves in Peninsular Malaysia. Forest Ecology and Management 363:140–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.12.037

Teegalapalli, K., G.V. Gopi & P.K. Samal (2009). Forest recovery following shifting cultivation: an overview of existing research. Tropical Conservation Science 2(4): 374–387.

Vallejo, B., A. Aloya, P. Ong, A. Tamino & J. Villasper (2008). Spatial patterns of bird diversity and abundance in an urban tropical landscape: The University of the Philippines Diliman campus. Science Diliman 20(1): 1–10.

Vanlalhlimpuia (2012). Diversity of herpetofauna in Mizoram University campus, Aizawl, Mizoram. MSc dissertation submitted to Mizoram University, India.

Voon, A.M., K.A. Nasradhi, M.A. Rahman & J.M. Azlan (2014). Bird diversity, density and foraging activities in a university campus landscape in Sarawak. Borneo Journal of Resources Science and Technology 4(2): 9–20.

Yadav, P.K. (2013). Slash-and-burn agriculture in north-east India. Expert Opinion in Environment and Biology 2(1): 1–4. https://doi.org/10.4172/2325- 9655.1000102

Most read articles by the same author(s)