Main Article Content
The present study which was conducted in 2015–16 and 2016–17 emphasizes the nine different types of habitats used by 40 listed butterflies in six different urban landscapes of Delhi. Assessment of flowerbeds, grasses, hedges/crops/bushes, artificial light, wet soil/damp patches/humus, trees, open spaces/grounds, bird droppings, and roads/pavements/concrete spaces in conserving butterfly diversity in highly urbanized landscapes by testing the hypothesis that diversity of butterflies across all the habitats are similar, was the focal point of the study. Except for the artificial light and the paved roads or concrete spaces, all other habitats were natural in surroundings. The families Lycaenidae and Nymphalidae had the largest habitat share (26%), whereas the family Hesperiidae had the minimum share (9%). Aravalli Biodiversity Park, New Delhi maintained the serenity of natural ones. Species richness and diversity was the highest at flowerbeds and lowest at the artificial light. The study highlights the choice of heterogeneous habitats by city butterflies to integrate the concept of the urban green spaces into a wide variety of urban development projects which in turn can help their own sustenance.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors own the copyright to the articles published in JoTT. This is indicated explicitly in each publication. The authors grant permission to the publisher Wildlife Information Liaison Development (WILD) Society to publish the article in the Journal of Threatened Taxa. The authors recognize WILD as the original publisher, and to sell hard copies of the Journal and article to any buyer. JoTT is registered under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which allows authors to retain copyright ownership. Under this license the authors allow anyone to download, cite, use the data, modify, reprint, copy and distribute provided the authors and source of publication are credited through appropriate citations (e.g., Son et al. (2016). Bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) of the southeastern Truong Son Mountains, Quang Ngai Province, Vietnam. Journal of Threatened Taxa 8(7): 8953–8969. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.2722.214.171.12453-8969). Users of the data do not require specific permission from the authors or the publisher.
Angold, P.G., J.P. Sadler, M.O. Hill, A. Pullin, S. Rushton, K. Austin, E. Small, B. Wood, R. Wadsworth, R. Sanderson & K. Thompson (2006). Biodiversity in urban habitat patches. Science of the Total Environment 360: 196–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.08.035
Brook, B.W., N.S. Sodhi & P.K.L. Ng (2003). Catastrophic extinctions follow deforestation in Singapore. Nature 424(6947): 420–423. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01795
Chandramouli, C. & R. General (2011). Census of India 2011. Provisional Population Totals. Government of India, New Delhi, India, 409–413pp.
Dapporto, L. & R.L. Dennis (2013). The generalist–specialist continuum: testing predictions for distribution and trends in British butterflies. Biological Conservation 157: 229–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.09.016
De Groot, R.S., M.A. Wilson & R.M. Boumans (2002). A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods, and services. Ecological Economics 41(3): 393–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7
Delhi Developmental Authority (2019). DDA’s adoption of park policy. In: Systems Department of DDA. Accessed 15 April 2020. http://dda.org.in/ddaparksadoption/Home.aspx
Delhi Government Health and Welfare Department (2020). COVID-19 hotspots in Delhi. Accessed 31May 2020. http://health.delhigovt.nic.in/wps/wcm/connect/doit_health/Health/Home/Covid19/
Henderson, P.A. (2005). Practical methods in ecology. Blackwell Publishers, United Kingdom, 148 pp.
Kehimkar, I. (2013). The Book of Indian Butterflies. Bombay Natural History Society (BNHS), Oxford University Press, New Delhi, India, 497 pp.
Koh, L.P. & N.S. Sodhi (2004). Importance of reserves, fragments, and parks for butterfly conservation in a tropical urban landscape. Ecological Applications 14: 1695–1708. https://doi.org/10.1890/03-5269
Koh, L.P. (2007). Impacts of land use change on South-east Asian forest butterflies: a review. Journal of Applied Ecology 44: 703–713. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01324.x
Kunte, K., S. Sondhi & P. Roy (2020). Butterflies of India, v. 2.86. Indian Foundation for Butterflies. https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/.Electronic version accessed 2 April 2020.
Larsen, T.B. (2005). Butterflies of West Africa. Apollo Books, Svendborg, Denmark, 595 pp.
Lizée, M.H., T. Tatoni & M. Deschamps‐Cottin (2015). Nested patterns in urban butterfly species assemblages: Respective roles of plot management, park layout and landscape features. Urban Ecosystems 19: 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-015-0501-5
McDonnell, M.J., A.K. Hahs & J.H. Breuste (2009). Ecology of cities and towns: a comparative approach. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom, 746pp.
McDonnell, M.J., S.T.A. Pickett, P. Groffman, P. Bohlen, R.V. Pouyat, W.C. Zipperer, R.W. Parmelee, M.M. Carreiro & K. Medley (1997). Ecosystem processes along an urban-to-rural gradient. Urban Ecosystems 1(1): 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73412-5_18
McIntyre, N.E. (2000). Ecology of urban arthropods: a review and a call to action. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 93: 825–835. https://doi.org/10.1603/0013-8746(2000)093[0825:EOUAAR]2.0.CO;2
Nielsen, A.B., M.V.D. Bosch, S. Maruthaveeran & C.K.V.D. Bosch (2014). Species richness in urban parks and its drivers: A review of empirical evidence. Urban Ecosystems 17: 305–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-013-0316-1
Paul, M. & A. Sultana (2020). Studies on butterfly (Insecta: Lepidoptera) diversity across different urban landscapes of Delhi, India. Current Science 118(5): 819–827.
Pollard, E., C.A.M. Van Swaay & T.J. Yates (1993). Changes in butterfly numbers in Britain and The Netherlands, 1990–91. Ecological Entomology 18(1): 93–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.1993.tb01086.x
Ramirez-Restrepo, L. & I. McGregor-Fors (2017). Butterflies in the city: a review of urban diurnal Lepidoptera. Urban Ecosystems 20: 171–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-016-0579-4
Rebele, F. (1994). Urban ecology and special features of urban ecosystems. Global Ecology and BiogeographyLetters 4(6): 173–187. https://doi.org/10.2307/2997649
Romos, S., R.K. Cowen, P. Re, A.A. Bordalo (2006). Temporal and Spatial distribution of larval fish assemblages in the Lima estuary (Portugal). Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 66(1–2): 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2005.09.012
Shwartz, A., A. Turbe, R. Julliard, L. Simon & A.C. Prevot (2014). Outstanding challenges for urban conservation research and action. Global Environmental Change 28: 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.002
Sing, K.W., H. Dong, W.Z. Wang & J.J. Wilson (2016). Can butterflies cope with city life? Butterfly diversity in a young megacity in Southern China. Genome 59: 751–761. https://doi.org/10.1139/gen-2015-0192
Singh, A.P. (2017). Butterflies of India, Om Books International, India,183pp.
Slancarova, J., J. Benes, M. Kristynek, P. Kepka & M. Konvicka (2014). Does the surrounding landscape heterogeneity affect the butterflies of insular grassland reserves? A contrast between composition and configuration. Journal of Insect Conservation 18(1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-013-9607-3
Smetacek, P. (2017). A Naturalist’s Guide to the Butterflies of India, Pakistan, Nepal, Bhutan, Bangladesh, and Sri Lanka. John Beaufoy Publishing Limited and Prakash Books, Delhi, India,117 pp.
Soga, M. & K.J. Gaston (2016). Extinction of experience: the loss of human- nature interactions. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 14(2): 94–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1225
Tickell, A. & R. Ranasinha (2018). Delhi: new writings on the megacity. Journal of Post-Colonial Writings 54 (3): 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 17449855.2018.1461977
Tratalos, J., R.A. Fuller, P.H. Warren, R.G. Davies & K.J. Gaston (2007). Urban form, biodiversity potential and ecosystem services. Landscape and Urban Planning 83:308–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.05.003
Winter, S. & G.C. Möller (2008). Habitats in lowland beech forests as monitoring tool for nature conservation. Forest Ecology and Management 255(3-4): 1251–1261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.10.029