Digital image post processing techniques for taxonomic publications with reference to insects
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
There exists substantial literature for capturing digital images of insect specimens for taxonomy purposes but very few papers are available on post processing of these images. We present a few techniques for editing digital images of insects using Adobe® Photoshop® which can be performed in a relatively short amount of time. The results clearly show that techniques using a combination of options like Curves, Dodge/Burn, Hue/Saturation and Lab Color mode in the software, enhance the quality of the original image without changing any taxonomic information. These methods applied in different combinations can be used for taxonomy of any insect taxon. We also caution the readers of the abuse of such techniques in context of taxonomy.
Article Details
Authors own the copyright to the articles published in JoTT. This is indicated explicitly in each publication. The authors grant permission to the publisher Wildlife Information Liaison Development (WILD) Society to publish the article in the Journal of Threatened Taxa. The authors recognize WILD as the original publisher, and to sell hard copies of the Journal and article to any buyer. JoTT is registered under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which allows authors to retain copyright ownership. Under this license the authors allow anyone to download, cite, use the data, modify, reprint, copy and distribute provided the authors and source of publication are credited through appropriate citations (e.g., Son et al. (2016). Bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) of the southeastern Truong Son Mountains, Quang Ngai Province, Vietnam. Journal of Threatened Taxa 8(7): 8953–8969. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.2785.8.7.8953-8969). Users of the data do not require specific permission from the authors or the publisher.
References
Azorsa, F., & J. Sosa-Calvo (2008). Description of a remarkable new species of ant in the genus Daceton Perty (Formicidae: Dacetini) from South America. Zootaxa 1749(1): 27–38. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1749.1.3
Buffington, M., & M. Gates (2008). Advanced imaging techniques II: using a compound microscope for photographing point-mount specimens. American Entomologist 54(4): 222. https://doi.org/10.1093/ae/54.4.222
Buffington, M.L., R.A. Burks & L. McNeil (2005). Advanced techniques for imaging parasitic Hymenoptera (Insecta). American Entomologist 51(1): 50–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/ae/51.1.50
Ceriaco, L.M., E.E. Gutierrez, A. Dubois & M. Carr (2016). Photography-based taxonomy is inadequate, unnecessary, and potentially harmful for biological sciences. Zootaxa 4196(3): 435–445. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4196.3.9
Häuser, C.L., A. Steiner, J. Holstein & M.J. Scoble (2005). Digital imaging of biological specimens: A manual for best practice; Results from a study of the European Network for Biodiversity Information. Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde, Stuttgart, 309pp.
Holzenthal, R.W. (2008). Digital illustration of insects. American Entomologist 54: 218–221. https://doi.org/10.1093/ae/54.4.218
Jakubec, P., M. Novák & J. Qubaiová (2018). Chroma+, a new automontage method of image background selection for insects and other structurally complex objects. ZooKeys 795: 67–76. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.795.26870
Jansen, M.A., & S.E. Halbert (2016). Key to Florida Alydidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) and selected exotic pest species. Insecta Mundi 0476: 1–14.
Kerr, P.H., E.M. Fisher & M.L. Buffington (2008). Dome lighting for insect imaging under a microscope. American Entomologist 54(4): 198–200. https://doi.org/10.1093/ae/54.4.198
Moravec, J. (2016). Taxonomic and nomenclatorial revision within the Neotropical genera of the subtribe Odontochilina W. Horn in a new sense—15. The genus Opisthencentrus W. Horn (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae). Zootaxa 4097(3): 332–340. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4097.3.2
Nguyen, C.V., D.R. Lovell, M. Adcock & J. La Salle (2014). Capturing natural-colour 3D models of insects for species discovery and diagnostics. PloS one 9(4): e94346. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094346
Otto, R.L. (2016). The false click beetles (Coleoptera: Eucnemidae) of Laos. Entomologica Basiliensia et Collectionis Frey 35: 181–427.
Riedel, A. (2005). Digital imaging of beetles (Coleoptera), and other three-dimensional insects, pp. 222–250. In: Häuser C.L., A. Steiner, J. Holstein, M.J. Scoble (eds.). Digital imaging of biological type specimens. A manual of best practice. Results from a study of the European Network for Biodiversity Information, Stuttgart .
Rogers, D.C., S.T. Ahyong, C.B. Boyko & C.D.U. D’Acoz (2017). Images are not and should not ever be type specimens: a rebuttal to Garraffoni & Freitas. Zootaxa 4269(4): 455–459. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4269.4.3
Rossini, M. & F.Z. Vaz-de-Mello (2017). A taxonomic review of the genus Isocopris Pereira and MartÃnez, 1960 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae), with description of a new Brazilian species. Journal of Natural History 51(19-20): 1091–1117. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2017.1319517
Weirauch, C., J.M. Bérenger, L. Berniker, D. Forero, M. Forthman, S. Frankenberg & S.A. Marshall (2014). An illustrated identification key to assassin bug subfamilies and tribes (Hemiptera: Reduviidae). Canadian Journal of Arthropod Identification 26(2): 1–115. https://doi.org/10.3752/cjai.2014.26
Wipfler, B., H. Pohl, M.I. Yavorskaya & R.G. Beutel (2016). A review of methods for analysing insect structures—the role of morphology in the age of phylogenomics. Current opinion in insect science 18: 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2016.09.004