Main Article Content
Â Information on the presence and distribution of species is crucial for conservation planning and management within a region.Â Documentation of species assemblages in Manas National Park (MNP) in the aftermath of conflict is critical for informed conservation interventions.Â For nearly two decades (1990â€“2010), conservation efforts in MNP were compromised by ethnoâˆ’political conflict.Â We conducted camera trapping surveys of terrestrial mammals across three administrative forest ranges (Panbari, Bansbari and Bhuyanpara) of MNP in 2017.Â A systematic survey with 118 trap locations accumulated data over 6,173 trap-days.Â We obtained 21,926 photographs of mammals belonging to 13 families and 25 species, of which 13 are threatened.Â We calculated photographic capture rate index (PCRI) using independent events.Â Trap specific PCRIâ€™s were used to map the spatial variation in capture rates.Â We observed variation in capture rate between Bansbari-Bhuyanpara where conflict ended in 2003 and has remained peaceful, and Panbari, a forest range where conflict ended later in 2016.Â Our results further indicate lower capture rates of mammalian prey species and small felids, but higher capture rates of four large carnivores in Panbari as opposed to Bansbari-Bhuyanpara.Â These results highlighted the fact that despite a history of ethno-political conflict in the region, although almost all mammalian species expected to occur in the park were detected and confirmed, present evidence indicated ethno-political conflict influences the distribution of several key species.Â In depth studies assessing mammalian prey densities, distribution and density are required to further understand the effects of conflict.Â
Authors own the copyright to the articles published in JoTT. This is indicated explicitly in each publication. The authors grant permission to the publisher Wildlife Information Liaison Development (WILD) Society to publish the article in the Journal of Threatened Taxa. The authors recognize WILD as the original publisher, and to sell hard copies of the Journal and article to any buyer. JoTT is registered under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which allows authors to retain copyright ownership. Under this license the authors allow anyone to download, cite, use the data, modify, reprint, copy and distribute provided the authors and source of publication are credited through appropriate citations (e.g., Son et al. (2016). Bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) of the southeastern Truong Son Mountains, Quang Ngai Province, Vietnam. Journal of Threatened Taxa 8(7): 8953–8969. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.2722.214.171.12453-8969). Users of the data do not require specific permission from the authors or the publisher.
Ahmed, M.F., S. Wangmo, D. Lahkar, P. Chakraborty, A. Sarmah, J. Borah, D. wangchuk, T. Nidup, T. Wangchuk, H.K. Sarma, A. Harihar & R. Pickles (2015). Tigers of Transboundary Manas Conservation Area, 2016. Aaranyak, Department of Environment and Forest, Government of Assam (BTC), Department of forests and Park Services, Ministry of Agriculture and Forests, Royal Government of Bhutan and WWF-India, Technical Report, Assam, India. 50pp.
Barman, R., B. Choudhury, N.V.K. Ashraf & V. Menon (2014). Rehabilitation of Greater One-horned Rhinoceros calves in Manas National Park, a World Heritage Site in India. Pachyderm 55: 78â€“88.
Benjamini, Y. & Y. Hochberg (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Bulletin 57: 289â€“300.
Beyers, R.L., J.A. Hart, A.R.E. Sinclair, F. Grossmann, B. Klinkenberg & S. Dino (2011). Resource wars and conflict ivory: the impact of civil conflict on elephants in the Democratic Republic of Congo - the case of the Okapi Reserve. PLoS ONE 6(11): e27129; http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027129
Butsic, V., M. Baumann, A. Shortland, S. Walker & T. Kuemmerle (2015). Conservation and conflict in the Democratic Republic of Congo: The impacts of warfare, mining, and protected areas on deforestation. Biological Conservation 191: 266â€“273; http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.06.0370006-3207
Carbone, C., S. Christie, K. Conforti, T. Coulson, N. Franklin, J.R. Ginsberg, M. Griffiths, J. Holden, K. Kawanishi, M. Kinnaird, R. Laidlaw, A. Lynam, D.W. Macdonald, D. Martyr, C. McDougal, L. Nath, T. Oâ€™Brien, J. Seidensticker, D.J.L. Smith, M. Sunquist, R.
Tilson & W.N. Wan Shahruddin (2001). The use of photographic rates to estimate densities of tigers and other cryptic mammals. Animal Conservation 4: 75â€“79; https://doi.org/10.1017/S1367943001001081
Champion, H.G. & S.K. Seth (1968). A Revised Forest Types of India. Manager of Publications, Government of India, Delhi, 404pp.
Daskin, J. & R.M. Pringle (2018). Warfare and wildlife declines in Africaâ€™s protected areas. Nature 533: 1â€“5; http://doi.org/10.1038/nature25194
de Merode, E., K.H. Smith, K. Homewood, R. Pettifor, M Rowcliffe & G Cowlishaw (2007). The impact of armed conflict on protectedâ€“area efficacy in Central Africa. Biology Letters 3: 299â€“301; http://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2007.0010
Goswami, R. & T. Ganesh (2014). Carnivore and herbivore densities in the immediate aftermath of ethnoâ€“political conflict: the case of Manas National Park, India. Tropical Conservation Science 7(3): 475â€“487; http://doi.org/10.1177/194008291400700308
Hallagan, J.B. (1981). Elephants and the war in Zimbabwe. Oryx 16: 161â€“164.
Hanson, T., T.M. Brooks, G.A.B. Da Fonseca, M. Hoffmann, J.F. Lamoreux, G. Machlis, C.G. Mittermeier, R.A. Mittermeier & J.D. Pilgrim (2009). Warfare in biodiversity hotspots. Conservation Biology 23: 578â€“587; http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01166.x
IUCN (2017). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2017-3. . Downloaded on 20 January 2018.
Lahkar, B.P., S. Nijhawan & M.F. Ahmed (2012). Assessment of local and landscapeâ€“level threats to the tiger population of the Manas landscape, Assam, India - Technical Report (Unpublished). Aaranyak, Assam, India, 15pp.
Menon, V. (2014). Indian Mammals - A Field Guide. Hachette Book Publishing India Pvt. Ltd., India, 528pp.
Olliff, E.R.R., C.W. Cline, D.C. Bruen, E.J. Yarmchuk, R.S.A. Pickles & L. Hunter (2014). The Pantheracamâˆ’ a camera-trap optimizied for monitoring wild felids. Wild Felid Monitoring 7: 21âˆ’23.
Orians, G.H. & E.W. Pfeiffer (1970). Ecological effects of the war in Vietnam. Science 168: 544â€“554.
QGIS Development Team (2012). QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project.
Tobler, M.W., S.E. Carrillo-Percastegui, R.L. Pitman, R. Mares & G. Powell (2008). An evaluation of camera traps for inventorying large- and medium-sized terrestrial rainforest mammals. Animal Conservation 11: 169â€“178; http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2008.00169.x
Wolf, C. & W.J. Ripple (2016). Prey depletion as a threat to the worldâ€™s large carnivores. Royal Society Open Science 3(8): 160252; http://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160252