Dietary assessment of five species of anuran tadpoles from northern Odisha, India

Main Article Content

Syed Asrafuzzaman
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8940-3126
Susmita Mahapatra
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1878-4205
Jasmin Rout
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1359-0826
Gunanidhi Sahoo
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2799-8272

Abstract

Anuran tadpoles are gregarious predators capable of differentiating food items among diverse types of prey via varied feeding and oral structures.  Tadpoles were collected from different study sites in three districts of northern Odisha during three consecutive rainy seasons (from July–October of 2015–2017).  After morphometric measurements (total length and body length), the stomach contents of 75 tadpoles belonging to five different anuran species (Duttaphrynus melanostictus, Euphlyctis cyanophlyctis, Fejervarya orissaensis, Polypedates maculatus and Microhyla ornata) belonging to four families namely Bufonidae, Dicroglossidae, Rhacophoridae and Microhylidae were examined.  The food spectrum of tadpoles included mostly detritus, followed by phytoplankton (represented by 5 classes and 54 genera).  Such studies contribute to the understanding of the natural diets of these anuran species that can assist in developing management strategies for them.  Aquatic habitats must be conserved and maintained so that conservation of anurans can be ensured.

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
Asrafuzzaman, S., Mahapatra, S., Rout, J. and Sahoo, G. 2018. Dietary assessment of five species of anuran tadpoles from northern Odisha, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa. 10, 10 (Sep. 2018), 12382–12388. DOI:https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.3902.10.10.12382-12388.
Section
Short Communications

References

Alford, R.A. (1999). Ecology: resource use, competition and predation, pp. 240–278. In: Mcdiarmid, R.W. & R. Altig (eds.). Tadpole: The Biology of Anuran Larvae. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA, 444pp.

Alford, R.A. & G.F. Johnston (1989). Guilds of anuran larvae: relationships among developmental modes, morphologies and habitats. Herpetological Monographs 3: 81–109; http://doi.org/10.2307/1466987

Altig, R. (2007). A primer for the morphology of anuran tadpoles. Herpetology Conservation and Biology 2(1): 71–74.

Altig, R. & R.W. McDiarmid (1999). Body plan: development and morphology, pp. 24–51. In: McDiarmid, R.W. & R.

Altig (eds.). Tadpole: The Biology of Anuran Larvae. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA, 444pp.

Ao, J.M. & M.K. Khare (1986). Diagnostic features of Hyla annectans Jerdon tadpoles (Anura: Hylidae). Asian Journal of Experimental Science 1: 30–36.

Aravind, N.A. & K.V. Gururaja (2011). Theme paper on the amphibians of the Western Ghats. Report Submitted to Western Ghats Ecology Expert Panel, Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF), Govt. of India, 29pp.

Bold, H.C. & M.J. Wynne (1985). Introduction to the Algae: Structure and Reproduction. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 720pp.

Brown, L.E. & R.R. Rosati (1997). Effects of three different diets on survival and growth of larvae of the African clawed frog Xenopus laevis. North American Journal of Aquaculture 59: 54–58; http://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8640(1997)059<0054:EOTDDO>2.3.CO;2

Cummins, K.W. & M.J. Klug (1979). Feeding ecology of stream invertebrates. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 10: 147–172; http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.10.110179.001051

Díaz-Paniagua, C. (1985). Larval diets related to morphological characters of five anuran species in the biological reserve of Doñana (Huelva, Spain). Amphibia-Reptilia 6: 307–322; http://doi.org/10.1163/156853885X00317

Duellman, W.E. & L. Trueb (1986). Biology of Amphibians. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 670pp.

Dumeril, A.M.C. & G. Bibron (1841). Erpetologie Generaleou Histoire Naturelle Complete des Reptiles. Volume 8. Librarie Enclyclopedique de Roret, Paris.

Dutta, S.K. (1997). Amphibians of India and Sri Lanka (Checklist and bibliography). Odyssey Publishing House, Bhubaneshwar, 342pp.

Dutta, S.K., M.V. Nair, P.P. Mohapatra & A.K. Mohapatra (2009). Amphibians and Reptiles of Similipal Biosphere Reserve. Plant Resource Centre, Bhubaneswar, 172pp.

Edmondson, W.T. (1959). Fresh Water Biology, 2nd Edition. John Willy & Sons Inc., New York, 1248pp.

Godin, J.J. & M.H.A. Keenleyside (1984). Foraging on patchily distributed prey by a cichlid fish (Teleostei, Cichlidae): A test of the ideal free distribution theory. Animal Behaviour 32: 120–131; http://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(84)80330-9

Gosner, K.L. (1960). A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica 16(3): 183–190; http://doi.org/10.2307/3890061

Gray, J.E. (1830). Description of Polypedates maculatus. Illustrations of Indian Zoology 83pp+82pls.

Harrison, J.D. (1987). Food and feeding relations of common frog and common toad tadpoles (Rana temporaria and Bufo bufo) at a pond in mid-Wales. Journal of Herpetology 1: 141–143.

Hendricks, F.S. (1973). Intestinal contents of Rana pipiens Schreber (Ranidae) larvae. The Southwestern Naturalist 18: 99–101.

Hoff, K.S., A.R. Blaustein, R.W. Mcdiarmid & R. Altig (1999). Behavior: interactions and their consequences, pp. 215–239. In: Mcdiarmid, R.W. & R. Altig (eds.). Tadpole: The Biology of Anuran Larvae. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA, 444pp.

Inger, R.F. (1986). Diets of tadpoles living in a Bornean rain forest. Alytes 5: 153–164.

Khare, M.K. & A.K. Sahu (1984). Diagnostic features of Rana danieli (Anura: Ranidae) tadpoles. Amphibia-Reptilia 5: 275–280; http://doi.org/10.1163/156853884X-005-03-08

Kiffney, P.M. & J.S. Richardson (2001). Interactions among nutrients, periphyton, and invertebrate and vertebrate (Ascaphus truei) grazers in experimental channels. Copeia 2001: 422–429; http://doi.org/10.1643/0045-8511(2001)001[0422:IANPAI]2.0.CO;2

Khongwir, S., A.J. Iangrai & R.N.K. Hooroo (2003). Development of mouth parts and food choice in the tadpoles of Rhacophorus maximus. Uttar Pradesh Journal of Zoology 23: 101–104.

Kupferberg, S.J. (1997). Facilitation of periphyton production by tadpole grazing: functional differences between species. Freshwater Biology 37: 427–439; http://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.1997.00170.x

Kupferberg, S.J., J.C. Marks & M.E. Power (1994). Effects of variation in natural algal and detrital diets on larval anuran (Hyla regilla) life history traits. Copeia 1994: 446–457; http://doi.org/10.2307/1446992

Orton, G. (1953). The systematics of vertebrate larvae. System­atic Zoology 2: 63–57; http://doi.org/10.2307/2411661

Lajmanovich, R.C. (2000). Interpretaciónecológica de unacomunidadlarvaria de anfibiosanuros. Interciencia 25: 71–79.

Mahapatra, S., S.K. Dutta & G. Sahoo (2017a). Opportunistic predatory behaviour in Duttaphrynus melanostictus (Schneider, 1799) tadpoles. Current Science 112(8): 1755–1759; http://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v112/i08/1755-1759

Mahapatra, S., J. Rout, G. Sahoo & J. Sethy (2017b). Dietary preference of Euphlyctis cyanophlyctis tadpoles in different habitats in and around Simlipal biosphere reserve, Odisha, India. International Journal of Conservation Science 8(2): 259–268.

McDiarmid, R.W. & R. Altig (1999). Tadpoles: The Biology of Anuran Larvae. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA, 444pp.

Nishimura, K. (1999). Exploration of optimal giving-up time in uncertain environment: a sit-and-wait forager. Journal of Theoretical Biology 199: 321–327; http://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.1999.0961

Petranka, J.W. & C.A. Kennedy (1999). Pond tadpoles with generalized morphology: is it time to reconsider their functional roles in aquatic communities? Oecologia 120: 621–631; http://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050898

Rossa-Feres, D.C., J. Jim & M.G. Fonseca (2004). Diets of tadpoles from a temporary pond in southeastern Brazil (Amphibia, Anura). RevistaBrasileira de Zoologia 21(4): 745–754; http://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81752004000400003

Saidapur, S.Κ. (1989). Reproductive cycles of Indian amphibians, pp. 166–224. In: Saidapur, S.Κ. (eds.). Reproductive Cycles of Indian Vertebrates. Allied Press, New Delhi.

Saidapur, S.K. (2001). Behavioural ecology of anuran tadpoles: the Indian scenario. The Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy B67: 311–322.

Schneider, J.G. (1799). Historia Amphibiorum Naturalis et Literarariae. Fasciculus Primus. Continens Ranas, Calamitas, Bufones, Salamandras et Hydros in Genera et Species Descriptos Notisquesuis Distinctos. Tena: Friederici Frommanni.

Seale, D.B. (1982). Obligate and facultative suspension feeding in anuran larvae: Feeding regulation in Xenopus and Rana. Biological Bulletin 162: 214–231; http://doi.org/10.2307/1540816

Seale, D.B. & R.J. Wassersug (1979). Suspension feeding dynamics of anuran larvae related to their functional morphology. Oecologia 39: 259–272; http://doi.org/10.1007/BF00345438

Sekar, A.G. (1990). Notes on morphometry, ecology, behaviour and food of tadpoles of Rana curtipes Jerdon, 1853. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 87: 312–313.

Sinha, B., P. Chakravorty, M.M. Borah & S. Bordoloi (2001). Qualitative analysis of food spectrum of five species of anuran tadpoles from Arunachal Pradesh, India. Zoos’ Print Journal 16(6): 514–515; http://doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.ZPJ.16.6.514-5

Smith, G.M. (1994). Manual of Phycology: An Introduction to the Algae and their Biology. Scientific Publishers, Jodhpur, India.

Talbot, A.J. & D.L. Kramer (1986). Effects of food and oxygen availability on habitat selection by guppies in a laboratory environment. Canadian Journal of Zoology 64: 88–93; http://doi.org/10.1139/z86-014