Comparison of beach profiles conducive for turtle nesting in Andaman

Main Article Content

Subramanian Narayani
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0960-2393
Sasidharan Venu
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0285-8169
Andrea Joan D'Silva
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1710-2380

Abstract

The present study was undertaken to compare beach characteristics associated with turtle nesting in the Andaman group of islands.  Karmatang, Kalipur, Ramnagar, Chidiyatapu, Carbyn’s Cove, and Wandoor were chosen as study sites.  Beach slope, sand grain characteristics, and general vegetation patterns were analysed.  The angle of inclination of the beach slope ranged from 2.06 to 8.3 degrees.  Beaches with a higher angle had a comparatively higher number of nesting sites.  The study shows that a single factor does not make a beach more conducive for nesting.  Chidiyatapu has the widest beach but lacks other features and so it is not a preferred nesting site.  The grain size of sand in Wandoor is highly favourable, but the intertidal region is not long and there are streams that can drown the nests.  Karmatang has a long beach and a higher slope angle.  Ramnagar has a moderate beach length and a high slope angle.  The dominant grains at both the beaches were found to be granules.  The absence of streams and artificial light, fewer number of anthropogenic activities, lack of obstacles, the presence of bordering vegetation, and a conducive beach slope with granular sand grains make Ramnagar, Karmatang, and Kalipur ideal for turtle nesting.

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
Narayani, S., Venu, S. and D’Silva, A.J. 2018. Comparison of beach profiles conducive for turtle nesting in Andaman. Journal of Threatened Taxa. 10, 10 (Sep. 2018), 12337–12343. DOI:https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.3373.10.10.12337-12343.
Section
Communications

References

Andrews, H.V., A. Tripathy, S. Aghue, S. Glen, J. Saw & K. Naveen (2006). The status of sea turtle populations in the

Andaman and Nicobar Islands of India. In: K. Shanker & H.V. Andrews (eds). Towards an Integrated and Collaborative Sea Turtle Conservation in India: a UNEP/CMS-IOSEA Project of Priority Research Areas. Center for Herpetology/Madras Crocodile Bank Trust., Chennai. 92 pp.

Bhaskar, S. (1984). Distribution and status of sea turtles in India, pp21–35. In: Silas, E.G. (ed.). Proceedings of the Workshop on Sea Turtle Conservation. CMFRI, Cochin, Special Publication No. 18, 120pp.

Bhasker, S. (1979). Sea turtle survey in the Andamans and Nicobars. Hamadryad 4(3): 2–26.

Blamires, S.J. & M.L. Guinea (1998). Implications of nest site selection on egg predation at the sea turtle rookery at Fog Bay, pp22–24. In: Kennett R., A. Webb, G. Duff, M.L. Guinea & G.J.E. Hill (eds.). Proceedings of the Marine Turtle Conservation and Management in Northern Australia Workshop. Centre for Indigenous and Natural Resources, Centre for Tropical Wetlands Management, Darwin, 89 pp.

Bouchard, S.S. & K.A. Bjorndal (2000). Sea turtles as biological transporters of nutrients and energy from marine to terrestrial ecosystems. Ecology 81: 2305–2313.

Clarke, K.R. & R.M. Warwick (2001). Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation, 2nd edition. PRIMER-E, Plymouth, 172pp.

Dattatri, S. (1984). Threats to sea turtles in India- exploitation and habitat perturbations, pp.59–66. In: Silas, E.G. (ed.). Proceedings of the Workshop on Sea Turtle Conservation.CMFRI, Cochin, Special Publication No. 18, 120pp.

Fujisaki, I. & M.M. Lamont (2016). The effects of large beach debris on nesting sea turtles. Journal of Experimental

Marine Biology and Ecology 482: 33–37.

Godfrey, M.H. & R. Barreto (1995). Beach vegetation and sea-finding orientation of turtle hatchlings. Biological Conservation 74: 29–32.

Godley, B.J., A.C. Broderick, S. Blackwood, L. Collins, K. Glover, C. McAldowie, D. McCulloch & J. McLeod (1993). 1991 survey of marine turtles nesting in Trinidad and Tobago. Marine Turtle Newsletter 61: 15–18.

Hughes, G.N., W.F. Greaves & J.D. Litzgus (2009). Nest selection by Wood Turtles (Glyptemys insculpta) in a thermally limited environment. Northeastern Naturalist 16(3): 321-338.

IUCN (2018). The IUCN Red list of Threatened Species. Version 2018-1. http://www.iucnredlist.org Electronic version accessed on 18.9.2017.

Kar, C.S. & M.C. Dash (1984). Mass nesting beaches of the olive ridley Lepidochelys olivacea (Eschscholtz, 1829) in Orissa and behavior during an arribada, pp.36–48. In: Silas, E.G. (ed.). Proceedings of the Workshop on Sea Turtle Conservation. CMFRI, Cochin, Special Publication No. 18, 120pp.

Lutz, P.L. & J.A. Musick (eds.) (1996). The Biology of Sea Turtles. CRC Press, USA, 448pp.

Mohan, L.R.S. (1986). Observations on the ecology of the nest and on some aspects of reproductive behaviour of the Ridley Turtle Lepidochelys olivacea from Calicut Coast. Indian Journal of Fisheries 33(1): 39–44.

Morales-Mavil, J.E., L.A. Contreras-Vega, A. Serrano, J. Cobos-Silva & L. Zavaleta-Lizárraga (2016). Spatial-temporal distribution of Kemp’s Ridley Turtles (Lepidochelys kempi) and Green Turtles (Chelonia mydas) nests in a beach of the north of Veracruz, Mexico, pp.33–53. In: Patterson, C. (ed.) Sea Turtles: Ecology, Behavior and Conservation. Nova Publishers, New York, 147 pp.

Murugan, A. (2010). The past and present scenario of sea turtles in India: an overview of possibility for recurrence of history. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on SEASTAR2000 and Asian Bio-logging Science (The 9th SEASTAR2000 workshop): 33–35; https://repository.kulib.kyoto-u.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/2433/107339/1/9thSeastar_33.pdf

Nicholas, M. (2001). Light pollution and marine turtle hatchlings: the straw that breaks the camel’s back? George Wright Forum 18(4): 77–82.

Spencer, R-J. (2002). Experimentally testing nest site selection: fitness trade-offs and predation risk in turtles. Ecology 83(8): 2136–2144; https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2136:ETNSSF]2.0.CO;2

Switzer, P.V. (1993). Site fidelity in predictable and unpredictable habitats. Evolutionary Ecology 7(6): 533–555.

Varela-Acevedo, E., K.L. Eckert, S.A. Eckert, G. Cambers & J.A. Horrocks (2009). Sea turtle nesting beach characterization manual, pp.46–97. In: Examining the Effects of Changing Coastline Processes on Hawksbilll Sea Turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata) Nesting Habitat. Master’s Project, Nicholas School of the Environment and Earth Sciences, Duke University. Beaufort, North Carolina USA, 97pp.

Weishampel, J.F., D.A. Bagley, L.M. Ehrhart & B.L. Rodenbeck (2003). Spatiotemporal patterns of annual sea turtle nesting behaviors along an East Central Florida beach. Biological Conservation 110: 295–303.

Weishampel, Z.A., W-H. Cheng & J.F. Weishampel (2016). Sea turtle nesting patterns in Florida vis-à -vis satellite-derived measures of artificial lighting. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation 2(1): 59–72; http://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.12

Wentworth, C.K. (1922). A scale of grade and class terms for clastic sediments. The Journal of Geology 30(5): 377–392.

Whitmore, C.P. & P.H. Dutton (1985). Infertility, embryonic mortality and nest-site selection in leatherback and green sea turtles in Suriname. Biological Conservation 34(3): 251–272.

Wood, D.W. & K.A. Bjorndal (2000). Relation of temperature, moisture, salinity, and slope to nest site selection in Loggerhead Sea Turtles. Copeia 2000(1): 119–128.

Wyneken, J., T.J. Burke, M. Salmon & D.K. Pederson (1988). Egg failure in natural and relocated sea turtle nests. Journal of Herpetology 22(1): 88–96.