Main Article Content
University campuses play a significant role in the conservation of avifaunal diversity, but there are very few studies on birds of such local biodiversity hotspots in India.Â Here, we document the patterns of abundance and species diversity of birds in Bharathiar University campus located in western Tamil Nadu, India.Â Birds were sampled using point counts.Â A total of 37 species belonging to 23 families were recorded from 144 point count samples.Â Mean species richness per point count sample was 13.85Â±0.47 species (Â±SD), and Shannon diversity index (HÊ¹) was 0.74.Â This study provides baseline data for monitoring the avifauna in the university campus, and demonstrates the importance of university campuses in bird conservation.Â
Authors own the copyright to the articles published in JoTT. This is indicated explicitly in each publication. The authors grant permission to the publisher Wildlife Information Liaison Development (WILD) Society to publish the article in the Journal of Threatened Taxa. The authors recognize WILD as the original publisher, and to sell hard copies of the Journal and article to any buyer. JoTT is registered under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which allows authors to retain copyright ownership. Under this license the authors allow anyone to download, cite, use the data, modify, reprint, copy and distribute provided the authors and source of publication are credited through appropriate citations (e.g., Son et al. (2016). Bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) of the southeastern Truong Son Mountains, Quang Ngai Province, Vietnam. Journal of Threatened Taxa 8(7): 8953–8969. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.27220.127.116.1153-8969). Users of the data do not require specific permission from the authors or the publisher.
Ali, S. (2012). The Book of Indian Birds. (13th Edition). Bombay Natural History Society, Oxford University Press.
Bibby, C.J., N.D. Burgess & D.A. Hill (1992). Bird Census Techniques. Academic Press, London.
Chakdar, B., P. Choudhury & H. Singha (2016). Avifaunal diversity in Assam University Capmus, Silchar, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 8(1): 8369â€“8378; http://doi.org/10.11609/jott.2518.104.22.16869-8378
Ferenc, M., Sedlacek, O., Fuchs, R., Dinetti, M., Fraissinet, M. & D. Storch (2014). Are cities different? Patterns of species richness and beta diversity of urban bird communities and regional species
assemblages in Europe. Global Ecology and Biogeography 23: 479-489; http://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12130
Gaston, K. (2000). Global patterns in biodiversity. Nature 405: 220-227; http://doi.org/10.1038/35012228
Horak, J., A. Peltanova, A. Podavkova, L. Safarova, P. Bogusch, D. Romportl & P. Zasadil (2013). Biodiversity responses to land use in traditional fruit orchards of a rural agricultural landscape. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 178: 71â€“77; http://dpoi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.06.020
Jayson, E.A. & D.N. Mathew (2000). Diversity and species-abundance distribution of birds in the tropical forests of Silent Valley, Kerala. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 97(3): 390â€“399.
Jiguet, F., V. Devictor, R. Julliard & D. Couvet (2012). French citizens monitoring ordinary birds provide tools for conservation and ecological sciences. Acta Oecologica 44: 58â€“66; http://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2011.05.003
Karthick, A. & L.A. Pragasan (2014). Stand structure and above-ground biomass of two tree plantations at Bharathiar University, Coimbatore. Indian Forester 140: 29â€“33.
Knudsen, E., A. Linden, C. Both, N. Jonzen, F. Pulido, N. Saino, W.J. Sutherland, L.A. Bach, T. Coppack, T. Ergon, P. Gienapp, J.A. Gill, O. Gordo, A. HedenstrÃ¶m, E. Lehikoinen, P.P. Marra, A.P. MÃ¸ller, A.L. Nilsson, G. PÃ©ron, E. Ranta, D. Rubolini, T.H. Sparks, F. Spina, C.E. Studds, S.A. Saether, P. Tryjanowski & N.C. Stenseth (2011). Challenging claims in the study of migratory birds and climate change. Biological Reviews 86: 928â€“946; http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00179.x
Lawton, J.H. (1999). Are there general laws in ecology? Oikos 84: 177â€“192; http://doi.org/10.2307/3546712
Magurran, A.E. (2004). Measuring Biological Diversity. Blackwell, Oxford.
Margules, T.F., K.F. Davies, C.R. Margules & J.F. Lawrence (2000). Which traits of species predict population declines in experimental forest fragments? Ecology 81: 1450â€“1461; http://doi.org/10.1890/0012-
McKinney, M.L. (2006). Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biological Conservation 127: 247â€“260; http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.005
Opdam, P. & D. Wascher (2004). Climate change meets habitat fragmentation: linking landscape and biogeographical scale levels in research and conservation. Biological Conservation 117: 285â€“297; http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2003.12.008
Paton, D., F. Romero, J. Cuenca & J.C. Escudero (2012). Tolerance to noise in 91 bird species from 27 urban gardens of Iberian Peninsula. Landscape and Urban Planning 104: 1â€“8; http://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.09.002
Ramesh, K. & P. McGowan (2009). On the current status of Indian Peafowl Pavo cristatus (Aves: Galliformes: Phasianidae): keeping the common species common. Journal of Threatened Taxa 1(2): 106â€“108; http://doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.o1845.106-8
Rayner, L., K. Ikin, M.J. Evans, P. Gibbons, D.B. Lindenmayer & A.D. Manning (2015). Avifauna and urban encroachment in time and space. Diversity and Distributions 21: 428â€“440; http://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12293
Ridley, M.W., A.D. Lelliot & M.R.W. Rands (1984). The courtship display of feral peafowl. Journal of World Pheasant Association 9: 57-68.
Suripto, B.A., H.S. Surakhman, Setiawan & J.A. Muthiya (2015). The bird species in Yogyakarta city: diversity, guild type composition and nest. KnE Life Sciences 2: 184-191; http://doi.org/10.18502/kls.v2i1.141
Tscharntke, T., J.M. Tylianakis, T.A. Rand, R.K. Didham & L. Fahrig (2012). Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes - eight hypotheses. Biological Reviews 87(3): 661â€“685; http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00216.x
Wiens, J.J. (2001). Widespread loss of sexually selected traits: how the Peacock lost its spots. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16: 517â€“520; http://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02217-0