Practicality versus idealism for curbing predatory publishing: a reply to Teixeira da Silva

Main Article Content

Rajeev Raghavan
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4612-3271
Neelesh Dahanukar
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7162-9023
Sanjay Molur
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8230-518X

Abstract

.

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
Raghavan, R., Dahanukar, N. and Molur, S. 2015. Practicality versus idealism for curbing predatory publishing: a reply to Teixeira da Silva. Journal of Threatened Taxa. 7, 15 (Dec. 2015), 8307–8308. DOI:https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.2472.7.15.8307-8308.
Section
Response & Reply

References

Beall, J. (2015a). http://scholarlyoa.com. Accessed on 18 December 2015.

Raghavan, R., N. Dahanukar & S. Molur (2015). Curbing academic predators: JoTT’s policy regarding citation of publications from predatory journals. Journal of Threatened Taxa 7(10): 7609–7611; http://dx.doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.o4388.7609-11

Teixeira da Silva, J.A. (2013). Predatory publishing: a quantitative assessment, the predatory score. The Asian and Australasian Journal of Plant Science and Biotechnology 7(Special Issue 1): 21–34.

Teixeira da Silva, J.A. (2014). Global Science Books: a tale from the cuckoo’s nest. How predatory open access publishing can influence the metrics of a traditional scholarly publisher. KOME 2(2): 73–81.

Teixeira da Silva, J.A. (2015). A response to the editorial on predatory publishing. Journal of Threatened Taxa 7(15): xx–xx; http://dx.doi.org/xx.xxxxx/JoTT.xxxxx.xxxxx-xx

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>