Post-impoundment changes in fish diversity and community structure of the Dikrong River, Arunachal Pradesh: a comparative assessment between 2000–2001 and 2025–2026
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.10476.18.9.29653-29666Keywords:
Conservation status, flow regulation, habitat degradation, habitat restoration, hillstream fishes, fish assemblage, river regulation, Sopo Dam, trophic compositionAbstract
A study carried out on the dam impacted Dikrong River, which is one of the major tributaries of the Brahmaputra in Arunachal Pradesh, suggests that the river has undergone significant ecological alteration following the commissioning of the Sopo dam in 2018 and increasing anthropogenic pressures. The present study attempted to assess the fish diversity, community structure, trophic composition, and conservation status in the Dikrong River during 2025–2026 and the results were compared with pre-impoundment records made in the year 2000–2001. A total of 27 fish species belonging to 24 genera, eight families, and three orders were recorded, with Cyprinidae dominating the assemblage (51.9%). Opsarius bendelisis was the most abundant species (44.1%). The taxonomic comparison with previous data reveals an apparent reduction in the number of species, mainly bottom feeders, which highlights their sensitivity to flow regulation and habitat modification. There was a change in the food chain from the dominance of bottom feeders to column feeders. Water release from regulation, riverbed quarrying, and runoff reduced the quality of the habitat and fish behavior. The juveniles of Semiplotus semiplotus, Opsarius bendelisis, and Devario aequipinnatus were found to be accumulating in the clean-connected drainage system downstream (polluted zone). The findings suggest a need for environmental flow regulation and habitat restoration to conserve remaining fish diversity. Further, the study recommends promotion of culture-based fisheries selecting some of the indigenous ornamental and food fish as a future conservation and livelihood strategy.
References
Abujam, S. et al. (2021). Trade potential of indigenous ornamental fishes of Arunachal Pradesh, India. Asian Fisheries Science 34(4): 312–325. https://doi.org/10.33997/j.afs.2021.34.4.004
Bagra, K. et al. (2009). Ichthyological survey and review of the checklist of fish fauna of Arunachal Pradesh, India. Checklist 5(2): 330–350.
Baladrón, A. et al. (2021). Can vegetation provide shelter to cyprinid species under hydro peaking? Science of the Total Environment 769: 145339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145339
Bell, J.D. et al. (2009). Planning the use of fish for food security in the Pacific. Marine Policy 33: 64–76.
Branco, P. et al. (2017). Do small barriers affect the movement of freshwater fish by increasing residency? Science of the Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.156
Bruno, M.C. et al. (2013). Multiple drift responses of benthic invertebrates to interacting hydropeaking and thermopeaking waves. Ecohydrology 6: 511–522. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1275
Cairns, J.R. Jr. & B.R. Niederlehner (1996). Developing a field of landscape ecotoxicology. Ecological Applications 6: 790–796.
Chaudhary, S. & L. Tamang (2007). Need to adopt traditional fishing gears in Senkhi. Current Science 93(12): 1647.
Costa, M.J. et al. (2019). The potential of lateral refuges for Iberian barbel under simulated hydropeaking conditions. Ecological Engineering 127: 567–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.07.029
Costanza, R. et al. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387: 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0
Couto, T.B. & J.D. Olden (2018).Global proliferation of small hydropower plants—science and policy. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 16: 91–100.
Darshan, A. et al. (2019). Biodiversity of fishes in Arunachal Himalaya: Systematics, classification, and taxonomic identification. Elsevier Academic Press.
Deegan, L.A. et al. (1997). Development and validation of an estuarine biotic integrity index. Estuaries 20(3): 601–617. https://doi.org/10.2307/1352609
Deinet, S. et al. (2020). The Living Planet Index (LPI) for Migratory Freshwater Fish. Technical Report.
Dhar, B. & S.K. Ghosh (2015). Genetic assessment of ornamental fish species from North East India. Gene 555(2): 382–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2014.11.037
Dominoni, D.M. et al. (2020). Why conservation biology can benefit from sensory ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 8: 502–511.
Dudgeon, D. et al. (2006). Freshwater biodiversity: Importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biological Reviews 81(2): 163–182.
Dugan, P.J. et al. (2006). Fisheries and water productivity in tropical river basins. Agricultural Water Management 80: 262–275.
Elliott, M. et al. (2007). The guild approach to categorizing estuarine fish assemblages. Fish and Fisheries 8(3): 241–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2679.2007.00253.x
Fricke, R. (2025). Eschmeyer’s Catalog of Fishes: Genera, Species, References. California Academy of Sciences. Electronic version accessed on 11 January 2025.
García, A. et al. (2011). Downstream environmental effects of dam operations. River Research and Applications 27: 312–327. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.1358
Gurumayum, S.D. (2025). On a collection of fishes from a small tributary of dam impacted Pare River. Journal of Bombay Natural History Society 122(2): 103–104.
Gurumayum, S.D. et al. (2016). Ichthyofaunal diversity of Arunachal Pradesh. International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies 4(2): 337–346.
Henriques, S. et al. (2008). Fish assemblages and environmental gradients in Portuguese estuaries. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 78: 512–524.
IUCN (2026). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2025–2. https://www.iucnredlist.org
Jamu, D. et al. (2011). Challenges to sustainable management of the lakes of Malawi. Journal of Great Lakes Research 37: 3–14.
Johnson, R.A. (2002). Landscape ecotoxicology and assessment of risk. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 8: 127–146.
Hammer, Ø. et al. (2001). PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4(1), 1–9.
Keila, A. et al. (2014). Hydrological changes in West Amazonia. Procedia Earth and Planetary Science 10: 287–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeps.2014.08.065
Kuriqi, A. et al. (2021). Ecological impacts of run-of-river hydropower plants. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 142: 110833.
Lakra, W.S. et al. (2010). Threatened freshwater fishes of India. NBFGR, National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources, Lucknow, India. (pp. 1–120)
Margules, C.R. & R.L. Pressey (2000). Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405: 243–253.
Mathieson, S. et al. (2000). Fish assemblages of European estuaries. Journal of Fish Biology 57(Suppl A): 63–78.
Moreira, M. et al. (2019). Ecologically-based criteria for hydropeaking mitigation. Science of the Total Environment. 657:1508-1522.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.107
Nagrodski, A. et al. (2012). Fish stranding in freshwater systems. Journal of Environmental Management 103: 133–141.
Nanda, P. et al. (2021). Aborichthys uniobarensis. Asian Journal of Conservation Biology 10(1): 3–9.
Nath, P. & S.C. Dey (2000). Fish and fisheries of North Eastern India. Narendra Publishing House.
Ovidio, M. & J.C. Philippart (2008). Movement patterns of nase. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 24: 256–262.
Pfauserová, N. et al. (2020). Spatial distribution of native fish species. Science of the Total Environment 143108.
Pielou, E.C. (1966). Species diversity and succession. Journal of Theoretical Biology 3: 131–144.
Rao, S. et al. (2021). Fish assemblage structure and flow alteration. River Research and Applications 38: 138–151.
Saunders, D.L. et al. (2002). Freshwater protected areas. Conservation Biology 16: 30–41.
Shannon, C.E. & W. Wiener (1963). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press.
Talwar, P.K. & A.K. Jhingran (1991). Inland Fishes of India and Adjacent Countries. Oxford & IBH.
Tamang, L. et al. (2007). Ichthyofaunal contribution to the state and comparison of habitat contiguity on taxonomic diversity in Senkhi stream, Arunachal Pradesh, India. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society, 104(2): 170–177.
Tamang, L. & S. Chaudhry (2012). Range extension of Conta pectinata Ng, 2005 (Teleostei: Sisoridae) in upper Brahmaputra River drainage in Arunachal Pradesh, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 4(2): 2402–2405. https://doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.o2933.2402-5
Tamang, L. & D.N. Das (2024). New freshwater fishes of Arunachal Pradesh. Journal of Bioresources 11(2): 72–80.
Taro, K. et al. (2022). Ichthyofaunal diversity of Senkhi stream. Journal of Threatened Taxa 14(7): 21356–21367. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.5738.14.7.21356-21367
Tierney, K.B. (2016). Chemical avoidance responses of fishes. Aquatic Toxicology 174: 228–241.
Tierney, K.B. et al. (2011). Swimming performance and invasion potential of the round goby (Neogobius melanostomus). Environmental Biology of Fishes, 92(4), 491–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-011-9867-2
Vishwanath, W. (2017). Diversity and conservation status of freshwater fishes of Northeast India. Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management 20: 86–101.
Winemiller, K.O. et al. (2016). Balancing hydropower and biodiversity. Science 351: 128–129.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Minam Siram, Tonya Miroh, Rafia Farooquee, Debanghsu Narayan Das
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors own the copyright to the articles published in JoTT. This is indicated explicitly in each publication. The authors grant permission to the publisher Wildlife Information Liaison Development (WILD) Society to publish the article in the Journal of Threatened Taxa. The authors recognize WILD as the original publisher, and to sell hard copies of the Journal and article to any buyer. JoTT is registered under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which allows authors to retain copyright ownership. Under this license the authors allow anyone to download, cite, use the data, modify, reprint, copy and distribute provided the authors and source of publication are credited through appropriate citations (e.g., Son et al. (2016). Bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) of the southeastern Truong Son Mountains, Quang Ngai Province, Vietnam. Journal of Threatened Taxa 8(7): 8953–8969. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.2785.8.7.8953-8969). Users of the data do not require specific permission from the authors or the publisher.
