Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 December 2016 | 8(14): 9597–9609

 

 

 

Vultures and people: Local perceptions of a low-density vulture population in the eastern mid-hills of Nepal

 

Sunita Phuyal 1, Hemant R. Ghimire 2, Karan B. Shah 3 & Hem S. Baral 4

1,2 Central Department of Environmental Science, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal

3 Natural History Museum, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal

3 Himalayan Nature, Lazimpat, Kathmandu, Nepal

4 School of Environmental Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Australia

1 Present Address: Department of Environment, Ministry of Population and Environment, Government of Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal

2 Present Address: Department of Electricity Development, Ministry of Energy, Government of Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal

4 Present Address: Zoological Society of London-Nepal Office, Kathmandu, Nepal

1 sunitaphuyal_env@yahoo.com (corresponding author), 2 hemantrajghimire@yahoo.com, 3 prof.karan@gmail.com,

4 hem.baral@gmail.com

 

 

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.11609/jott.2492.8.14.9597-9609

Editor: Chris Bowden, RSPB, Sandy, UK. Date of publication: 26 December 2016 (online & print)

Manuscript details: Ms # 2492 | Received 24 August 2016 | Final received 28 November 2016 | Finally accepted 05 December 2016

Citation: Phuyal, S., H.R. Ghimire, K.B. Shah & H.S. Baral (2016). Vultures and people: Local perceptions of a low-density vulture population in the eastern mid-hills of Nepal. Journal of Threatened Taxa 8(14): 9597–9609; http://dx.doi.org/10.11609/jott.2492.8.14.9597-9609

Copyright: © Phuyal et al. 2016. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. JoTT allows unrestricted use of this article in any medium, reproduction and distribution by providing adequate credit to the authors and the source of publication.

Funding: Bird Conservation Nepal (Jatayu Scholarship), and Idea Wild, USA (instrument support).

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no competing interests.

Author Details: Sunita Phuyal has completed her MSc in Environmental Science from Central Department of Environmental Science, Tribhuvan University. She had worked in various conservation organizations, and has conducted various researches on birds and reptiles. Currently she is working as Environmental Inspector in Department of Environment, Ministry of Population and Environment. Hemant R. Ghimire has completed MSc in Environmental Science from the Central Department of Environmental Science, Tribhuvan University. He is interested in the conservation biology and ecology of wildlife. His previous researches emphasized on the conservation of a protected species in unprotected areas. He is working in Government of Nepal for more than 4 years, and currently as an Environmentalist in Department of Electricity Development, Ministry of Energy. Karan B. Shah is a Professor of Zoology with the Natural History Museum, Tribhuvan University. He has been involved in wildlife research for 35 years, with a strong research emphasis in the conservation of native species. He has published 17 books, more than 55 research articles, and more than 100 popular science articles. Hem S. Baral has a PhD in ornithology from the University of Amsterdam, and has been actively involved in bird conservation for nearly 30 years. He held important positions for BirdLife Nepal, Himalayan Nature and Nepalese Ornithological Union in the past. Currently he is working as the head of Nepal conservation programme for ZSL and is an Adjunct Senior Lecturer in the School of Environmental Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Australia.

Author Contribution: All authors were involved in conceptualization, data analysis, and manuscript preparation and editing. SP and HRG were also involved in field work and data collection. SP led the whole research work and it is a part of her MSc Thesis.

Acknowledgements: We would like to thank Bird Conservation Nepal, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) and Darwin Initiative, UK for funding (Jatayu Scholarship); Idea Wild, USA for instrument support. We are also grateful to Simon Poulton for his critical comments and Paul Barnes for improving the English text in an earlier version of the manuscript. We also thank Krishna D. Hengaju, Naresh Kusi, Mithun Bista, Meena Bohora and Kamala Shrestha for their assistance during the questionnaire survey, and Shiva Phuyal for her assistance during the transect survey. Our grateful thank goes to Ramesh Pd. Sapkota, Central Department of Environmental Science, Tribhuvan University, Khadananda Paudel, Bird Conservation Nepal, and all peers of Central Department of Environmental Science, Tribuvan University for their contribution on the research. We would like to thank the people of Ramechhap District for their help and information on vultures without being annoyed. We would like to thank the Central Department of Environmental Science, Tribhuvan University for allowing the research.

 

 

 

Abstract: The cause for rapid decline of the South Asian vulture population in 1990s was unknown for many years until diclofenac was proved to be the main reason for such decline in 2004. The vulture populations from Nepal has also undergone rapid decline that causes low awareness among people about its ecological importance. For declining species that have large range and are mostly associated with humans, people’s attitudes can have direct effects on their survival because of the multiple linkages and potential for both positive and negative impacts of human behaviour for these large scavengers. However, little is known about vultures in the eastern mid-hills of Nepal. Therefore, we conducted a study in Ramechhap, a district in the eastern mid-hills of Nepal, to assess the vultures’ status and human relations using transect and questionnaire surveys respectively. Himalayan Griffons Gyps himalayensis and Egyptian Vultures Neophron percnopterus were found in the area, and the majority of respondents interviewed had a positive attitude towards vultures (58.8%) and their conservation (47.3%). Although neglected in previous studies, a neutral attitude (20% towards vultures and 15.8% towards vulture conservation) can be significant (largely related to ignorance) and can be readily turned to negative due to the vulture’s carcass consuming behaviour and lack of conventional appeal to many people, with implications for the success of a conservation programme. In our study, carcass scarcity appeared to be an increasing concern with about 90% of the respondents reporting burying cattle carcasses, and that this practice has recently increased. In the course of the study period, however, two (unburied) carcasses were observed. Our study found that nimesulide, a potentially toxic NSAID for vultures, was used for veterinary purpose in the study area, which could be a serious threat to vultures. Other human activities such as carcass poisoning pose threats to vultures in the study area. Therefore, for long term vulture conservation, local attitudes and behaviour should be considered along with ecological aspects of vultures.

 

 

Keywords: Attitude survey, awareness, carcass scarcity, conservation attitude, eastern Himalaya, neutral attitude, nimesulide, Ramechhap, social aspects of conservation, vulture conservation.

 

 

 

Introduction

 

Nepal supports all nine species of South Asian vultures (Phuyal 2012). After the unprecedented massive decline in the vulture population since 1990s, researches identified the consumption of carcasses treated with a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), diclofenac, being behind the main population crash (Green et al. 2004; Oaks et al. 2004; Shultz et al. 2004). When the vultures get exposed to diclofenac, they develop acute visceral gout and die due to renal failure (Oakes et al. 2004; Shultz et al. 2004) within 48 hours of exposure (Swan et al. 2006).

The vulture populations in Nepal were no exception and declined sharply. The population decline of Oriental White-backed Vulture Gyps bengalensis and Slender-billed Vulture Gyps tenuirostris were more than 90% between 1995 and 2011 (Chaudhary et al. 2012). The major decline in vulture population has resulted in a ban of manufacture and import of veterinary formulations of diclofenac in Bangladesh (Ramírez et al. 2014), India (MoEF 2006), Nepal (DNPWC/MoFSC/GoN 2009), and Pakistan (Green et al. 2007), emphasizing the use of meloxicam, the only NSAID currently considered safe for vultures (Naidoo et al. 2009, 2010). Nowadays, secondary poisoning is growing as a threat for the vultures as unintentional or deliberate poisoning of animals has caused significant vulture mortality (Harris 2013; Joshi et al. 2015). Food shortage is another emerging threat to vulture survival, as people prefer to bury carcasses in order to prevent disease (Baral & Gautam 2007), resulting in less food available to the vulture (Joshi et al. 2015).

Despite having the highest number of ecosystems and species diversity in Nepal (HMGN/MFSC 2002), the Nepalese mid-hill (1,000–3,000 m) is poorly represented in the protected area management system of the country (Acharya 2004). In addition, the studies on vulture in Nepal are from the lowlands (Baral et al. 2004; Subedi 2008), trans-Himalayan regions (Acharya 2006; Acharya et al. 2009, 2010), and western mid-hills (for e.g., in Rampur, Baral et al. 2005; in Arghakhanchi, Bhusal 2011; in Baitadi, Karmacharya 2011 and Joshi et al. 2015), but far less in the eastern mid-hills. Knowledge gaps for large ranging species such as vultures (sometimes over 20,000km2) (Gilbert et al. 2007) in an area can seriously impact conservation activities for the species. This is because even if there are no vultures in the eastern mid-hills, adverse conditions for the vultures in the area can act as a sink for the vultures of surrounding areas, further contributing to the decline of this group of vultures and this condition can hinder the ongoing vulture conservation programme. Despite the ban on diclofenac, there are many cases where diclofenac is still available in the veterinary medical shops of Nepal (Acharya 2006; Paudel 2008; Subedi 2008; Acharya et al. 2009). With this scenario, the availability of diclofenac and other NSAIDs lethal to vultures is an important factor that must be considered for vulture conservation.

Residing near human habitation, vultures are directly affected by the activities of the people. Attitude and intention may predict behaviour, which can indicate support for management or conservation effort (Heberlein 2012; Reimer et al. 2013). There is, however, a lack of species-specific attitude studies for rare or uncharismatic species; the formation of attitude and behaviour towards species should be understood and positive attitude should be promoted to avoid further losses (Bjerke et al. 1998; Baral & Gautam 2007; Reimer et al. 2013). The studies of the attitude survey either consider positive or negative attitude, often neglecting the proportion of the population holding the neutral attitude, which can eventually turn into positive or negative from a single event (Ericsson & Heberlain 2003). In this study, we analysed the human relations along with status of the vultures through transect and questionnaire surveys. We also tried to analyse the importance of the neutral attitude that has been generally neglected in other vulture attitude surveys.

 

 

Materials and Methods

 

Study Area

Ramechhap (27.33333–27.833330N and 85.83333–86.583330E), a plough-shaped mid-hill district of the Central Development Region, Nepal (Fig. 1). It covers an area of 1564.32km2, most of which lies in the hills and the mountains at altitudes between 439m and 6,959m above mean sea level. There are 55 village development committees (VDCs) in the district. Due to different geophysical conditions, the climate varies from sub-tropical to alpine. In the winter season, the mean daily temperature of the mid and higher hills is about 110C and that of valleys is 200C. In the summer season, the mean daily temperature of the high hills is 200C, mid-hills is 300C or higher, and valleys is 300C. The average annual rainfall of the district is 2,055mm (DDC 2004).

Vulture Status Survey

We conducted transect surveys to assess the number of vultures present in the area, and also observed the vultures feeding on carcasses. We utilized the predetermined route (trails used by local people) as transects (Gregory et al. 2004; Acharya et al. 2009), surveyed on foot, and recorded all observed vultures. Length of the transect covered varied according to settlement, altitude and weather. We conducted transect survey in rain-free days with good visibility. Although, the transect survey was conducted on slightly cloudy days, we terminated the survey if there was rainfall for more than one hour in a day or visiblity was not clear to locate the vultures. As vultures are active throughout the day, transect surveys were carried out between 08:00hr and 17:00hr (±0.5 hour at starting and ending time according to availability of lodging sites). Although the length of transects was shorter in slopes (4–4.5 km per day) comparing to the plains (6–6.5 km per day), the average length of transects was about 5.5km per day during the transect surveys. In Nepal, most of the carcasses are disposed on river banks, therefore the route was selected where possible nearer the river courses during the study to improve the chances of encountering unburied carcasses and thereby vultures. The elevation of the transects ranged from 440–3,051 m.

The transect surveys were conducted in January and repeated and extended in April (Fig. 2) in order to coincide with the breeding season of the vultures (Baral et al. 2005; Bhusal 2011) to maximize the probability of locating vultures’ nests in the area. For the first transect survey, (6 days, from 6–13 January 2012), the count started from the border of Those VDC and Chuchure VDC to the border of Khimti VDC and Tilpung VDC. For the second transect survey (12 days, from 3–16 April 2012), we first repeated the same trails and then extended the transect from the border of Those VDC and Chuchure VDC to Seleghat (border of Ramechhap District and Sindhuli District) and from Rasnalu VDC to Chuchure VDC. Our transect survey covered 17 VDCs of Ramechhap District (Fig. 2). We observed vultures with binoculars (Bushnell Legacy WP, 8×42), identified the birds with ‘Nepalka Charaharu’ (Birds of Nepal, Nepali Version, Grimmett et al. 2003), photographed the vultures for further identification with a camera (Nikon p500, 4–144 mm) and located the coordinates of vultures with GPS (Garmin Etrex H) as far as possible.

 

Questionnaire preparation

During the first transect survey, we performed informal interviews and discussions among locals in the lodging sites to ascertain the attitude level, threats and other background information related to vultures in the study area. We discussed the preliminary information among peers, professors and experts in Kathmandu and prepared structured questionnaires for this study. We selected five graduate students of environmental science to assist in the questionnaire survey. Prior to the questionnaire survey, we performed sample questionnaires between the interviewers. After getting the feedback from these sample interviews, we finalized the questionnaires.

The questionnaire for local people consisted of 14 closed questions and eight open questions to express their answers more clearly (see Appendix I). The questionnaire was structured for two outcomes: (i) to know the practices of the respondents that may be likely to affect vulture survival such as number of livestocks, number of livestock deceased and probability of exposure of lethal drugs to vultures; and (ii) respondents’ attitude towards vultures such as killing of vulture, perception towards declining of vulture population, ugliness of vultures and their willingness to conserve vultures.

In most parts of Nepal, veterinary medicines are sold not only from veterinary medical shops but also from agrovet shops. In these places, the agricultural materials such as fertilizers, pesticides, seeds and agriculture related machines are sold along with the veterinary medicines. Therefore, we conducted questionnaire survey among the veterinary medical and agro vet shops (VMAVSs) of the study area, where the questionnaire included five closed questions and eight open questions (see Appendix II). The questions were related to use of diclofenac and other harmful NSAIDs, use of meloxicam, knowledge of ban of diclofenac, probability of the use of the human diclofenac in livestock.

Undertaking the questionnaire survey

We conducted structured questionnaire survey (Huntington 2000; Baral & Gautam 2007) in March–April 2012, among the 165 randomly selected houses of three randomly selected VDCs, Khimti, Pharpu and Betali. For the questionnaire survey, we used a household list from voter name list of the three VDCs offices. Then, the households were numbered and were selected randomly using MS Excel. All the selected numbers were visited as far as possible, however, for those households with no people above 16 years of age, the household immediately after the selected household was approached. We carried out the questionnaire survey related to threats to vultures and attitudes towards vulture conservation in person during home visits, delivering the questions to the respondents orally in Nepali. During the questionnaire surveys, we applied a representative technique, that is we approached anyone ≥16 years that was available in the house. For the economic status of the respondents, we considered non-monetary parameters (e.g., number of livestocks, house type, number of family members, occupation, area of the land). After the questionnaire survey, with the help of raw data of the study area, we assumed monetary value to those non-monetary parameters by consulting with the peers, socio-economic experts, and professors of Tribhuvan University, Nepal. We categorised the economic status per person into very poor (yearly income <NRs 25,000), poor (yearly income NRs 25,000–75,000), lower middle (yearly income NRs 75,000–1,25,000), upper middle (yearly income NRs 1,25,000–2,00,000) and rich (yearly income >NRs 200,000) ($1≈ NRs 90).

We measured the attitude of local people towards vulture using five related questions (question numbers 7, 8, 9, 10 and 12 of Appendix I) and combined these questions to form a single attitude scale. We graded each answer with a number and summed response for each question as negative (1), positive (3) and neutral (2). Based on these numbers, we considered the respondents scoring greater than 10 as having positive attitude, those less than 10 as having negative attitude and those respondents scoring 10 as having neutral attitude. We linked the attitudes of people towards vulture directly to attitude of people towards vulture conservation from their view on conservation (question number 13 of Appendix I).

We conducted structured questionnaire surveys for VMAVSs to study the availability of NSAIDs. We located all VAMVSs of the six VDCs (VDCs considered for first transect survey) and the district headquarter, Manthali VDC, and found six VAMVSs in the areas; one in each Those, Betali, Khimti VDCs and three in Manthali VDC. We interviewed all six VMAVSs delivering the questions orally in Nepali. During the questionnaire survey, we only interviewed a single person involved in treatment and selling of the veterinary medicine in each VMAVSs. After completion of questionnaire interview, we requested them to divulge the medicines they used to treat inflammation in livestock and only after their consent (and all of them agreed), we searched the NSAID medicines in their shops.

We also included information from observation during transect survey, personal communication with different people (such as veterinary professionals, local club members (women group member, local cooperative members), and local stakeholders (such as owners of tea shops, lodge, teachers) that were not included in questionnaire survey) by visiting them personally as well as consulting with them during our survey, and some new information that arose during questionnaire survey from the respondents.

Analysing the data

We presented the transect survey data in a descriptive manner and tabulated form. We analysed the questionnaire data with the help of SPSS version 16 and MS Excel. We expressed mean and standard deviation for ratio variables and frequencies for the nominal variables. The association between two variables was tested using chi-square test with the 95% confidence level. We expressed the information obtained during informal interview and observation in a descriptive manner.

 

 

Result

 

Status of vultures

We observed 22 Himalayan Griffons Gyps himalayensis and seven Egyptian Vultures Neophron percnopterus in seven places over two days of April 2012 during the second transect survey (Table 1; Images 1, 2 & 3). Of these, 12 Himalayan Griffons were observed at one carcass (Images 2 & 3), which was stuck in the bank of the Tamakoshi River at Benighat (27.356860N & E 85.985760E).

 

Demography of the respondents

Our questionnaire survey covered 53.3% female and 46.7% male, ages ranging from 16 to 83 years (mean age= 41.45 years and median age = 40 years). The demography of the respondents is shown in Table 2. We found the male respondents had a higher education level than the female respondents (χ2=10.197, p=0.017). Similarly, the respondents belonging to Brahmins and Chhetris had higher education level than other ethnic groups (χ2=13.788, p=0.032). Likewise, respondents involved in agriculture and paid labourers were the least educated than other occupations (χ2=1.223, p<0.001). The economic status of the respondents, however, was not associated with their education level (χ2=20.604, p=0.056).

A total of 375 livestock of 96 respondents had deceased within a five-year period. Of these respondents, 89.6% buried the carcass, 7.3% threw the carcass in the river or from a cliff, 2.1% gave to others and 1% sold the carcass. Out of the 156 respondents having livestock, 69.9% usually got their livestock treated by veterinary professionals (Doctor or Junior Technical Assistant, JTA). Of the respondents, 86.5% had given medication to their livestock in which 62.2% respondents had brought from government veterinary shops and 37.8% had brought them from private veterinary shops.

 

 

 

Attitude of the respondents

Out of 165 respondents, 58.8% had a positive attitude, 21.2% had a negative attitude and 20% had a neutral attitude towards vultures (Table 3).

Only 121 respondents had observed vultures in their area; of them, 55.56% had noticed vulture declines and the main cause of the vulture decline perceived by them is shown in Fig. 3. None of the respondents said they had killed vultures, but two (1.2%) of the respondents had used vulture’s bone to scare away the spirit (Image 4) and as ‘Mahakali oil’ (a type of herbal massage oil) for strong bones.

The respondents had different views regarding the role of the vultures in the environment, reasons to conserve or not to conserve them (Table 4).

The attitude of the respondents towards vultures was significantly influenced by gender (male were more favourable), education level (positive correlation), observed vultures in their areas (more favourable), noticed the vulture decline (more favourable), considered vultures as ugly (less favourable), symbol of bad luck (less favourable), and vultures’ important role in the environment (more favourable); however ethnicity, economic status and occupation of the respondents apparently had little influence on attitude towards vultures (Table 5). Apart from this, the occupation (high paid were more favourable) and economic status of the respondents (positive correlation) played significant role in shaping their attitude towards vulture conservation (Table 5). Elder people were less supportive to vulture conservation concept; however, these people did not have a negative attitude towards vulture. Respondents who had a favourable attitude towards vulture were highly in favour of vulture conservation (63.92%) compared to neutral (33.33%) and negative attitudes (14.29%) (χ2= 40.408, p<0.001).

We did not find any of VMAVSs selling medicines containing diclofenac and but one agro vet shop in the Manthali VDC contained nimesulide (believed to be toxic to vulture: Cuthbert et al. 2016) as viol; other VMAVSs did not contain any other NSAIDs except meloxicam. From 2010–2011, all of six VMAVSs informed us they had replaced diclofenac with meloxicam. We found two private veterinary professionals (33.33%) however unaware of the ban of diclofenac in Nepal.

 

Causes of vulture decline

From the field observation and the personal communication with local people, the other probable causes of vulture decline besides diclofenac from the study area were listed to be:

1. Carcass scarcity: The two carcasses observed during transect surveys and 89.6% of the respondents reported burying livestock carcasses suggested the area had fewer carcasses available for the vultures.
2. Use of harmful drugs: We found nimesulide in an agrovet shop that may have adverse impact on the vulture populations in the area.
3. Poisoning: One respondent during a questionnaire reported that some 10–12 vultures were killed due to consumption of poisoned feral dog carcass during 2002.

 

Discussion

This is the first documented study of vultures in the eastern mid-hills of Nepal. In Nepalese society, vultures are generally considered as an unattractive bird and bearer of bad luck (Baral et al. 2007); attitudes are influenced by physical and behavioural characteristics of the species as people prefer to conserve familiar, charismatic or those species having utilitarian benefits, ignoring unfamiliar, rare and uncharismatic species, despite their ecological significance (Serpell 2004; Martín-López et al. 2007; Reimer et al. 2013). Despite these beliefs, a majority of the respondents have a positive attitude towards vultures (58.8%) and nearly half of the respondents have positive attitude towards vulture conservation (47.3%) in our study area. Similarly, males, people with higher education level, high economic status, and with positive attitude towards vultures were more favourable towards vulture conservation. Peoples’ negativity towards vulture conservation, it was seen, increases with age. We believe this differences relates to the increased level of communication associated with young people, who have thereby been exposed to information that highlights the positive health and environmental benefits of vultures.

We did not find any vulture’s nest during the study in the area. Although, during the questionnaire survey, 21.7% of the people informed the presence of Red-headed Vulture Sarcogyps calvus, Oriental White-backed Vultures and Himalayan Griffon in the study area more than 10 years back; only Himalayan Griffons and Egyptian Vultures were observed during the study period. This may be either because vultures have declined from the study area during 1990s as in other parts of South Asia or these vultures might have have been missed by the survey. Egyptian Vultures are generally associated to dumping sites as observed in our vulture survey, and also recorded in low numbers in Pyuthan, Salyan and Palpa Districts of central and western Nepal, however, more frequent in Kaski and Arghakhachhi Districts (Subedi & Decandido 2014). Nevertheless, Himalayan Griffons were more recorded than Egyptian Vultures in our study, which might be due to Himalayan Griffon’s relatively high density. The Himalayan Griffons are recorded in more numbers from far-western Nepal (Joshi et al. 2015), Upper Mustang (Acharya et al. 2009) and Annapurna Conservation Area (Virani et al. 2008) than our study, which suggests that the Himalayan Griffon might have lower density in the area than in western Nepal.

We found that the neutral attitudes have occupied a significant proportion (20% towards vultures and 15.8% towards vulture conservation). The sudden decline of vultures during 1990s and their disappearance may have increased the unfamiliarity with a number of people and may have created the neutral attitude towards vultures. Weaker attitudes towards vulture and its conservation can become a barrier to successful conservation programmes as people with neutral (or weaker) attitudes are less likely to care about the species or be indifferent to change their attitudes (as in the case of the wolf in Sweden Ericsson & Heberlain 2003). If we do not consider the neutral attitude, it can turn to negative attitude due to the unattractiveness and carcass eating behaviour of the vultures. Providing information about status and importance of vultures can gather support for conservation programmes as accurate information is helpful to transform into positive attitude towards the species and promote local support for the conservation (Martín-López et al. 2007; Baral et al. 2007; Barnes 2013; Ghimire et al. 2014).

With high proportion of people in favour of vulture conservation, the Egyptian Vulture and Himalayan Griffon populations might have a lower probability of intentional persecution. The carcass burying activity seems particularly unfavourable for Himalayan Griffon’s survival. During our survey, only two carcasses were observed, and most of the Himalayan Griffons were observed near carcasses and Egyptian Vultures in the dumps. Although 375 livestock had been reported to have deceased in the 165 surveyed households within a 5-year period, approximately 90% of the respondents said they bury carcasses. The reported carcasses burial practice in our study is apparently higher than other parts of Nepal (e.g., 60% in Baitadi: Karmacharya 2011; 22% in Rampur: Baral & Gautam 2007). Carcass burial campaign by local government authorities was ongoing in the study area during the study, for preventing the spread of diseases, which explains the increased carcass burying practices in the area. Local people should be encouraged to dump disease free carcasses in a safe place (far from water sources and human settlements) because although, most of pathogens are killed in the digestive tract of vultures except the high resistant pathogens, there are chances of disease spread through passive route like feet or feather of vultures (Houston & Cooper 1975).

Besides carcass burying activity, vultures have become victim of deliberate or unintentional poisoning of carcasses not only in Nepal (e.g., at Dang: Republica 2011; at Nawalparasi: The Himalayan Times 2014), but also more widely (e.g., in Canary Island: Donázar et al. 2002; in Africa: Monadjem et al. 2004; in Spain: Hernández & Margalida 2009; in Myanmar: Hla et al. 2010; in Cambodia: Clements et al. 2013). The death of vultures due to poisoned carcass reported from the area might be repeated in the future, particularly for killing of feral dogs and cats, if not addressed.

Ramechhap is one of the diclofenac free zones of Nepal (BCN 2011). Despite the ban on diclofenac from the country in 2008, informal discussions with veterinary personnel reveal that local people still prefer to use diclofenac with the belief that it is cheap and more effective than other NSAIDs. With this concept, diclofenac is still available illegally in different regions of Nepal especially those connected with India (e.g., in Lumbini: Paudel 2008; Nawalparasi: Subedi 2008). Our study area has recently improved trade links with the lowlands (Terai) through roads, therefore, there is possibility of illegal importation of NSAIDs, harmful to the vultures in the study area. In addition, the illegal use of human diclofenac in cattle is still a serious potential threat (Cuthbert et al. 2016). There might be less chance of the illegal use of human diclofenac, however, as most users bought the medicine for cattle from veterinary shops and we did not find diclofenac in these shops. Nevertheless, recent research has found nimesulide as a further potential threat to vultures (Cuthbert et al. 2016), and we found nimesulide being sold for veterinary purpose in the study area. The NSAIDs poisoning in vulture is difficult to detect due to late effects of NSAIDs (up to 48 hours in case of diclofenac: Swan et al. 2006), and the diclofenac poisoning was unnoticed for several years until 2004 (Green et al. 2004; Oaks et al. 2004; Shultz et al. 2004). As NSAIDs poisoning can go undetected and can severely impact the vultures, the availability of nimesulide for veterinary purpose in the study area should be taken up seriously and immediately.

Despite the limitations in the sample size in small area, our study helps to understand the human relations with vultures in the eastern mid-hills of Nepal. Successful vulture conservation programme should include creation of a long term survival environment for vultures with involvement of the people in all of its range areas along with its ecological aspects. Our study suggests that people with neutral attitudes towards vulture is significant. The number of Egyptian Vultures and Himalayan Griffons observed during the transect survey may provide benchmark for the vultures in the area. Although, the rate of decline of the Egyptian Vulture and Himalayan Griffon as well as other Gyps vultures have been slowed down or may be reversed to some degree (Prakash et al. 2012; Galligan et al. 2014; Paudel et al. 2016), these vultures are highly susceptible to any threat due to their low density. In addition, use of nimesulide for veterinary purposes has arisen as potential threats for vultures in the study area. Therefore, assessment on availability of nimesulide and its safety for vultures; and further studies as well as conservation activities on gap areas such as eastern mid-hill should be conducted for effective conservation.

 

 

REFERENCES

 

Acharya, K.P. (2004). Does community forests management supports biodiversity conservation? evidences from two community forests from the mid hills of Nepal. Journal of forest and livelihood 4(1): 44–54.

Acharya, R. (2006). Status of Himalayan Griffon Gyps himalayensis Hume, 1869 and ethno-vulture relationship in Upper Mustang, Nepal. MSc Thesis. School of Environmental Management and Sustainable Management (ScHEMS), Pokhara University, Kathmandu, Nepal.

Acharya, R., R. Cuthbert, H.S. Baral & K.B. Shah (2009). Rapid population declines of Himalayan Griffon Gyps himalayensis in Upper Mustang, Nepal. Bird Conservation International 19(1): 99–107; http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0959270908007417

Acharya, R., R. Cuthbert, H.S. Baral & A. Chaudhary (2010). Rapid decline of the Bearded Vulture Gypaetus barbatus in Upper Mustang, Nepal. Forktail 26: 117–120.

BCN (2011). Annual report 2010/11. Bird Conservation Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal.

Baral, H.S., J.B. Giri & M.Z. Virani (2004). On the decline of Oriental White-backed Vultures Gyps bengalensis in lowland, Nepal, pp. 215–219. In: Chancellor, R.D. & B.U. Meyburg (eds.). Raptors Worldwide. Proceedings of the 6th World Conference of Birds of Prey and Owls, Berlin and Budapest: WWGBP and MME/BirdLife Hungary.

Baral, N., R. Gautam & B. Tamang (2005). Population status and breeding ecology of White-rumped Vulture Gyps bengalensis in Rampur valley, Nepal. Forktail 21: 87–91.

Baral, N. & R. Gautam (2007). Socio-economic perspectives on the conservation of critically endangered vultures in South Asia: an empirical study from Nepal. Bird Conservation International 17(2): 131–139; http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0959270907000688

Baral, N., R. Gautam, N. Timilsina & M.G. Bhat (2007). Conservation implications of contingent valuation of Critically Endangered White-rumped Vulture Gyps bengalensis in South Asia. International Journal of Biodiversity Science and Management 3(3): 145–156; http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17451590709618169

Barnes, P. (2013). Battitude: an assessment of human attitude and behaviour towards the Critically Endangered Pteropus rodricensis. MSc Thesis. Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College, London, the UK.

Bhusal, K.P. (2011). Population status and breeding success of Himalayan Griffon, Egyptian Vulture and Lammergeier in Gherabhir Arghakhanchi, Nepal. MSc Thesis. Central Department of Zoology, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.

Bjerke, T., T.S. Ødegårdstuen & B.P. Kaltenborn (1998). Attitudes toward animals among Norwegian adolescents. Anthrozoos: A Multidisciplinary Journal of the Interactions of People & Animals 11(2): 79–86; http://dx.doi.org/10.2752/089279398787000742

Chaudhary, A., T.R. Subedi, J.B. Giri, H.S. Baral, B. Bidari, H. Subedi, B. Chaudhary, I. Chaudhary, K. Paudel & R.J. Cuthbert (2012). Population trends of Critically Endangered Gyps vultures in the lowlands of Nepal. Bird Conservation International 22(3): 270–278; http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0959270911000426

Clements, T., M. Gilbert, H.J. Rainey, R. Cuthbert, J.C. Eames, P. Bunnat, S. Teak, S. Chansocheat & T. Setha (2013). Vultures in Cambodia: population, threats and conservation. Bird Conservation International 23(1): 7–24; http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0959270912000093

Cuthbert, R.J., M.A. Taggart, M. Saini, A. Sharma, A. Das, M.D. Kulkarni, D. Deori, S. Ranade, R.N. Shringarpure, T.H. Galligan & R.E. Green (2016).  Continuing mortality of vultures in India associated with illegal veterinary use of diclofenac and a potential threat from nimesulide. Oryx 50(1): 104–112; http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S003060531500037X

DDC Ramechhap (2004). District Profile of Ramechhap (Nepali version). District Development Committee of Ramechhap District, Nepal. http://www.ddcramechhap.gov.np/userfiles/ramechhap%20district%20profile%202061.pdf. Accessed on 28 May 2014.

DNPWC/MoFSC/GoN (2009). Vulture Conservation Action Plan for Nepal (2009–2013), Kathmandu. Government of Nepal, Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation, Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation, Nepal. http://www.save-vultures.org/Documents/09%20Nepal%205%20Yr%20Vulture%20Action%20Plan%20Final.pdf. Accessed on 28 May 2014.

Donázar, J.A., C.J. Palacios, L. Gangoso, O. Ceballos, M.J. González & F. Hiraldo (2002). Conservation status and limiting factors in the endangered population of Egyptian Vulture (Neophron percnopterus) in the Canary Islands. Biological Conservation 107(1): 89–97; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00049-6

Ericsson, G. & T.A. Heberlein (2003). Attitudes of hunters, locals, and the general public in Sweden now that the wolves are back. Biological conservation 111(2): 149–159; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00258-6

Galligan, T.H., T. Amano, V.M. Prakash, M. Kulkarni, R. Shringarpure, N. Prakash, S. Ranade, R.E. Green & R.J. Cuthbert (2014). Have population declines in Egyptian Vulture and Red-headed Vulture in India slowed since the 2006 ban on veterinary diclofenac? Bird Conservation International 24(03): 272–281; http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0959270913000580

Ghimire, H.R., S. Phuyal & K.B. Shah (2014). Protected species outside the protected areas: people’s attitude, threats and conservation of the Yellow Monitor (Varanus flavescens) in the far-western lowlands of Nepal. Journal for Nature Conservation 22(6): 497–503; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2014.08.003

Gilbert, M., R.T. Watson, S. Ahmed, M. Asim & J.A. Johnson (2007). Vulture restaurant and their role in reducing diclofenac exposure in Asian vultures. Bird Conservation International 17(1): 63–77; http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0959270906000621

Green, R.E., I. Newton, S. Shultz, A.A. Cunningham, M. Gilbert, D.J. Pain & V. Prakash (2004). Diclofenac poisoning as a cause of vulture population declines across the Indian Subcontinent. Journal of Applied ecology 41(5): 793–800; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00954.x

Green, R.E., M.A. Taggart, K.R. Senacha, B. Raghavan, D.J. Pain, Y. Jhala & R. Cuthbert (2007). Rate of decline of the Oriental White-backed Vulture population in India estimated from a survey of diclofenac residues in carcasses of ungulates. PLoS ONE 2(8): e686; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000686

Gregory, R., D.W. Gibbons & P.F. Donald (2004). Birds census and survey techniques, pp. 7–56. In: Newton, W.J.I. & R.F. Green (eds.). Bird Ecology and Conservation, A Handbook of Techniques. Sutherland. Oxford University Press, New York.

Grimmett, R., C. Inskipp, T. Inskipp & H.S. Baral (2003). Nepalka Charaharu (Birds of Nepal, Nepali version). Oxford University Press, Delhi.

HMGN/MFSC (2002). Nepal biodiversity strategy. His Majesty’s Government of Nepal / Ministry of Forests & Soil Conservation, Nepal. https://www.cbd.int/doc/world/np/np-nbsap-01-en.pdf. Accessed on 28 May 2014.

Harris, R.J. (2013). The conservation of Accipitridae vultures of Nepal: a review. Journal of Threatened Taxa 5(2): 3603–3619; http://dx.doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.o2816.3603-19

Heberlein, T.A. (2012). Navigating environmental attitudes. New York: Oxford University Press.

Hernández, M. & A. Margalida (2009). Poison-related mortality effects in the endangered Egyptian Vulture (Neophron percnopterus) population in Spain. European Journal of Wildlife Research 55(4): 415–423; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10344-009-0255-6

Hla, H., N.M. Shwe, T.W. Htun, S.M. Zaw, S. Mahood, J.C. Eames & J.D. Pilgrim (2010). Historical and current status of vultures in Myanmar. Bird Conservation International 21(4): 376–387; http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0959270910000560

Houston, D.C. & J.E. Cooper (1975). The digestive tract of the Whiteback Griffon Vulture and its role in disease transmission among wild ungulates. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 11(3): 306–313; http://dx.doi.org/10.7589/0090-3558-11.3.306

Huntington, H.P. (2000). Using traditional ecological knowledge in science: methods and applications. Ecological Applications 10(5): 1270–1274; http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1270:UTEKIS]2.0.CO;2

Joshi, M.K., M.K. Chalise, A. Chaudhary & H.B. Katuwal (2015). Himalayan Vultures in Khodpe, far-west Nepal: is there any threat? Journal of Threatened Taxa 7(14): 8128–8133; http://dx.doi.org/10.11609/jott.2427. 7.14.8128-8133

Karmacharya, D.K. (2011). Population status, breeding success and conservation approaches of vultures with special reference to Himalayan Griffon (Gyps himalayensis Hume, 1969) in Khodpe, Baitadi, Nepal. MSc Thesis. Central Department of Zoology, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.

Martín-López, B.M., C. Montes & J. Benayas (2007). The non-economic motives behind the willingness to pay for biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation 139(1): 67–82; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.06.005

MoEF (2006). Action plan for vulture conservation in India. Ministry of Environment and Forest, India. http://www.save-vultures.org/Documents/06%20MoEF%20Indian%20vulture%20Recov%20Plan%20Apr%2006.pdf. Accessed on 28 May 2014.

Monadjem, A., M.D. Anderson, S.E. Piper & A.F. Boshoff (eds.) (2004). The vultures of southern Africa- quo vadis?. Proceedings of a workshop on vulture research and conservation in southern Africa, Birds of Prey Working Group, Endangered Wildlife Group, Johannesburg, 1–11pp.

Naidoo, V., K. Wolter, D. Cromarty, M. Diekmann, N. Duncan, A.A. Meharg, M.A. Taggart, L. Venter & R. Cuthbert (2009). Toxicity of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs to Gyps vultures: A new threat from ketoprofen. Biology Letter 6(3): 339–341; http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2009.0818

Naidoo, V., L. Venter, K. Wolter, M. Taggart & R. Cuthbert (2010). The toxicokinetics of ketoprofen in Gyps coprotheres: toxicity due to zero-order metabolism. Archives of Toxicology 84(10): 761–766; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00204-010-0521-0

Oaks, J.L., M. Gilbert, M.Z. Virani, R.T. Watson, C.U. Meteyer, B.A. Rideout, H.L. Shivaprasad, S. Ahmed, M.J.I. Chaudhry, M. Arshad, S. Mahmood, A. Ali & A.A. Khan (2004). Diclofenac residues as the cause of population decline of vultures in Pakistan. Nature 427: 630–633; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature02317

Paudel, K., T. Amano, R. Acharya, A. Chaudhary, H.S. Baral, K.P. Bhusal, I.P. Chaudhary, R.E. Green, R.J. Cuthbert & T.H. Galligan (2016). Population trends in Himalayan Griffon in Upper Mustang, Nepal, before and after the ban on diclofenac. Bird Conservation International 26(3): 286–292; http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0959270915000192

Paudel, S. (2008). Vanishing vultures and diclofenac prevalence in Lumbini IBA. Danphe - Bird Conservation Nepal Newsletter 17(2): 1–3.

Phuyal, S. (2012). Status of the vultures and conservation attitude of the people towards vultures in Ramechhap District. MSc Thesis. Central Department of Environmental Science, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.

Prakash V., M.C. Bishwakarma, A. Chaudhary, R. Cuthbert, R. Dave, M. Kulkarni, S. Kumar, K. Paudel, S. Ranade, R. Shringarpure & R.E. Green (2012). The population decline of Gyps vultures in India and Nepal has slowed since veterinary use of diclofenac was banned. PLoS ONE 7(11): e49118; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049118

Ramírez, I., J.C. Atienza, C. Bowden & J. Tavares (2014). Diclofenac in Europe-current situation, legal aspects, potential impacts and required actions. Executive summary of Vulture Conservation Foundation, SEO, RSPB and IUCN Vulture Specialist Group. http://www.4vultures.org/app/download/8151606085/Diclofenac_Techical_Dossier.pdf?t=1400105721. Accessed on 29 May 2014.

Reimer, A., A. Mase, K. Mulvaney, N. Mullendore, R. Perry‐Hill & L. Prokopy (2013). The impact of information and familiarity on public attitudes toward the eastern hellbender. Animal Conservation 17(3): 235–143; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acv.12085

Republica (2011) 15 vultures die after eating poisoned carcass. Republica National Daily Newspaper, Nepal. http://archives.myrepublica.com/portal/index.php?action=news_details&news_id=29398. Accessed on 29 May 2014.

Serpell, J.A. (2004). Factors influencing human attitudes to animals and their welfare. Animal Welfare 13(supplement 1): 145–151.

Shultz, S., H.S. Baral, S. Charman, A.A. Cunningham, D. Das, G.R. Ghalsasi, M.S. Goudar, R.E. Green, A. Jones, P. Nighot, D.J. Pain & V. Prakash (2004). Diclofenac poisoning is widespread in declining vulture populations across the Indian Subcontinent. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 271 (supplement 6): S458–S460; http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2004.0223

Subedi, P. (2008). Monitoring of Gyps species vultures in Nawalparasi District, Nepal. Banko Jankari 18(2): 35–43.

Subedi, T.R. & R. DeCandido (2014). Population and breeding success of Red-headed Vulture Sarcogyps calvus and Egyptian Vulture Neophron percnopterus in central west Nepal, Vulture News 67(2): 21–32; http://www.iucn-vulturenews.org/Vol67/VN67%20complete.pdf#page=21. Accessed on 20 October 2016.

Swan, G., R. Cuthbert, M. Quevedo, R.E. Green, D.J. Pain, P. Bartels, A.A. Cunningham, N. Duncan, A.A. Meharg, J.L. Oaks, J. Parry-Jones, S. Shultz, M.A. Taggart, G. Verdoorn & K. Wolter (2006). Toxicity of diclofenac to Gyps vultures. Biology Letters 2(2): 279–282; http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2005.0425

The Himalayan Times (2014). 11 vultures of rare species found dead in Nawalparasi. The Himalayan Times National Daily Newspaper, Nepal. http://www.thehimalayantimes.com/fullNews.php?headline=11+ vultures+of+rare+species+found+dead+in+Nawalparasi&NewsID=404758. Accessed on 29 May 2014.

Virani, M.Z., J.B. Giri, R.T. Watson & H.S. Baral (2008). Surveys of Himalayan Vultures (Gyps himalayensis) in the Annapurna Conservation Area, Mustang, Nepal. Journal of Raptor Research 42(3): 197–203; http://dx.doi.org/10.3356/JRR-07-35.1