Habitat and seasonal
distribution of Odonata (Insecta)
of Mula and Mutha river
basins, Maharashtra, India
Aboli S. Kulkarni1 & K.A. Subramanian 2
1 Agharkar Research Institute, Gopal Ganesh Agarkar Road, Pune,
Maharashtra 411004, India
2 Zoological Surveyof India, M-Block, New Alipore, Kolkata, West Bengal
700053, India
1 aboli.kulkarni5@gmail.com, 2 subbuka.zsi@gmail.com
(corresponding author)
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.o3253.4084-95| ZooBank: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:05552EEE-692D-4AA8-AFAE-4E96AE123D93
Editor: Albert G. Orr, Griffith
University, Nathan, Australia. Date
of publication: 26 April 2013 (online & print)
Manuscript details: Ms #
o3253 | Received 14 July 2012 | Final received 19 March 2013 | Finally accepted
24 April 2013
Citation: Kulkarni,
A.S. & K.A. Subramanian (2013). Habitat and seasonal
distribution of Odonata (Insecta)
of Mula and Mutha river
basins, Maharashtra, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 5(7):
4084–4095; http://dx.doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.o3253.4084-95
Copyright: © Kulkarni& Subramanian 2013. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. JoTTallows unrestricted use of this article in any medium, reproduction and
distribution by providing adequate credit to the authors and the source of
publication.
Funding: Vinod Gadgil Smruti Pratishthan, Nashik, Maharashtra.
Competing Interest: None.
Acknowledgements: Aboli Kulkarni is grateful to “Vinod Gadgil Smruti Pratishthan, Nashik, Maharashtra”
for providing funding assistance for this work and to Director, Zoological
Survey of India and Officer-in-Charge Western Regional Centre for providing
laboratory facilities to identify Odonata. She is
also grateful to Dr. N.V. Joshi, CES, IISc, Bangalore for clearing basic
concepts of statistical analysis, and to Dr. Ankur Patwardhan and Dr. Anand Padhye,Garware College, Pune for their encouragement and
support. We also sincerely thank Col. Ashwin Baindur, College of Military Engineering, Pune for facilitating our studies in CME campus.
Author
Contribution: AK did the field work,
identified the odonata and analyzed the data. KAS
designed the study, identified odonata, analyzed the
data and wrote the manuscript.
Author
Details: Ms. Aboli Kulkarni is a post graduate student of biodiversity and this work is a
part of her MSc Thesis. Currently, she is working on documentation of flora and
fauna of Sacred Groves from Pune District at AgharkarResearch Institute, Pune. She is deeply interested in studying Habitat Ecology
and habitat preferences of organisms.
Dr. K.A. Subramanian is scientist at Zoological Survey of
India, Kolkata. Currently he is working on the diversity and distribution of Odonata, Ephemeroptera and Plecoptera of India.
For figures, images, tables -- click here
Abstract: Catchment landscape degradation and habitat modifications of freshwater
ecosystems are a primary cause of biodiversity loss in riverine ecosystems all
over the world. Many elements of
the flora and fauna of freshwater ecosystems are sensitive to the changes in
catchment land use and habitat modification. These sensitive taxa are also
reliable indicators of freshwater ecosystem health. In the current study we investigate the
seasonal and habitat distribution of Odonata (Insecta) across riparian land use types in Mula and Mutha river basins,
northern Western Ghats, Maharashtra. There was a difference in the species composition across land use types
and across seasons with highest diversity and abundance during the post monsoon
period. The highest Odonata diversity was observed in urban areas followed by
forest and agriculture fields. There was a loss of 31% of the odonate fauna
in the study area over 50 years which could be due to
rapid industrialization and urbanization of the region and consequent
degradation of freshwater ecosystems. The significance of catchment land use on Odonatadiversity and its value in landscape monitoring is discussed.
Keywords: Habitat use, local extinctions, northern Western Ghats, Odonata, seasonal distribution.
Introduction
Around the world, freshwater habitats are being subjected to increased
levels of human disturbance (Saunders et al. 2002). An assessment of the status of inland
water ecosystems shows that globally, the most threatened river catchments are
found in the Indian subcontinent (WCMC 2000; Subramanian 2010; Subramanian et
al. 2011). Healthy riverine
ecosystems are vital for ecological integrity of the landscape. However, anthropogenic modifications
such as the construction of dams, draining of streams, agricultural expansion,
urban and industrial pollution and riparian deforestation have resulted in
degradation of aquatic ecosystems and loss of freshwater biodiversity all over
the world, especially in tropical Asia and including the Western Ghats (Dudgeon
1994, 2000; Subramanian, 2010; Molur et al.
2011). Such activity influences
natural resources, hydrology, nutrient cycle and natural habitat over time and
space, changes which in turn reduce the biodiversity of a region. Some modifications result in
loss of certain species which are sensitive to habitat
changes while promoting colonization by generalized widespread species which
can tolerate the changed conditions. A detailed review of biodiversity and threats to riverine
ecosystems of the Western Ghats (Subramanian 2010; Moluret al. 2011) highlights the impact of anthropogenic modifications to the
riparian zones in terms of depleting fresh water biodiversity of the region.
These reviews emphasis the need for long term catchment scale conservation
strategies for the freshwater biodiversity of the Western Ghats.. These strategies are directly dependant upon detailed documentation of
biodiversity at various spatio-temporal scales and
development of suitable indicators for long term monitoring. The indicator approach was followed
using aquatic macroinvertebrates such as dragonflies
and damselflies (Odonata), Coleopteraand Mollusca to identify, monitor and conserve freshwater ecosystems in South
Africa and United Kingdom. These
studies have shown that Odonata are reliable
indicators for freshwater ecosystem health (Samways1992, 1993, 1995; Clark & Samways 1996; Painter
1999). Odonataforms an important tool for various types of assessments and monitoring such as
measure of biodiversity, wetland health and integrity, biological impact of
climate change etc (Ortelli2008).
The odonatefauna of the Western Ghats is diverse with 176 species, 68 of which are endemic
(Subramanian 2009; Subramanian et al. 2008, 2011). Many species are very specific to
particular breeding habitat and adults are usually found close to these. This habitat specificity of species
makes them an ideal candidate to assess and monitor ecosystem health.
The rich diversity and
habitat specificity of Odonata of India provide a
unique opportunity to develop tools for assessing freshwater ecosystem
health. An earlier study conducted
in Uttara Kannada District, Karnataka has shown that
there is a clear relationship between Odonatadiversity and riparian land use (Subramanian 2008). The Odonata of Pune District was documented by various workerssince the beginning of the 20th century (Fraser 1933–36;
Prasad 1996). These studies were
mostly species checklists and details of habitat and season distribution were
not available. Pune is one of the
most industrialized and urbanized landscapes of the subcontinent with rapid
changes in land use. The freshwater
ecosystems of the region are highly stressed due to pollution and habitat
alteration. The river basins of the
region are heavily deforested and also have the highest density of dams in the
Western Ghats (Subramanian 2010). A
study on diversity and distribution pattern of odonatesin such highly impacted landscapes will help in understanding ongoing
ecological processes in shaping species communities and identifying factors
driving local species loss. The
present study aims to document habitat and seasonal distribution of Odonata in the Mula-Mutha river
basins, major tributaries of the Bhima River which eventually drains into the Krishna basin.
Materials
and Methods
Study Area
The study was carried out in
the Mula-Mutha river basins between Tamhini Reserve Forest (18.4600N & 73.4140E)
and Ujani Wetland (18.2990N & 74.7630E)
in Pune District, Maharashtra State during May 2010 to April 2011. It covers an area of approximately 150km2(Image 1). There is a clear
altitude and rainfall gradient from west to east in the study area (Table
1). The TamhiniReserve Forest in the Western Ghats is at a higher elevation and receives more
rainfall than the Ujani Wetland in the east.
The study area includes
various habitats such as semi evergreen forest, agricultural land, urban-industrial area (Pune City), natural and manmade wetlands.
Study sites were selected in three predominant land use types viz., forest,
agriculture and urban (Images 2–7). In forested landscapes, we sampled
streams with forest cover. The
important stream habitats were cascades, riffles, small waterfalls and pools. Paddy and sugarcane dominate the
agricultural landscapes. This land
use type is scattered throughout the study area from west to east. The urban zone is largely located
between forest and agriculture landscape to the west and agriculture landscape
to the east and we sampled dams, rivers, garden ponds and lakes in this region.
Sampling Methods
Adult odonates were sampled in 12 sampling
localities (Table 1). The sampling
was carried out using a belt transect of 500x10 m for one and half hour in the
study sites between 0900 to 1300 hrs when their activity was at its peak. Field sampling was done
during the premonsoon (May–June) and postmonsoon (August–October) periods and winter
(November–February) during May 2009 to February 2010. Each transect was traversed on foot and
all the adult dragonflies observed within 5m of transect line were identified
and counted. Common species were
identified, photographed in the field (Appendix 1) and unidentified ones were
collected using a butterfly net and identified in the laboratory using taxonomic
literature and field identification guides (Fraser 1933–1936; Subramanian
2009).
Habitat Assessment
Habitat quality was assessed
during sampling. The following observations were made for each of the transect:
availability of perching sites, presence of emergent aquatic vegetation, human
disturbance such as domestic sewage, industrial effluent, solid waste, check
dams, canalization, riparian deforestation, flow modification, agricultural
runoff, and soil erosion. Based on
these observations each site was ranked for a disturbance score ranging from
1–10, 1 being the lowest and 10 the highest.
Data Analysis
The input for the data
analysis was a relative abundance matrix of family, genera and species across
sites, land use types and seasons. Abundance data were log transformed to study relative abundance across
seasons in different land use types. Diversity indices were calculated using the software PAST (Hammer et al.
2001).
Results
Species Abundance
A total of 609 individuals
belonging to 46 species in 26 genera and eight families wasrecorded during the study period (Table 2). The most dominant species was Pantala flavescens(Fabricius, 1798) whichaccounted for 23% of total number of individuals found during sampling. This dominance could be due to mass
emergence of the species after monsoon and their yearly aggregation before
migration. Individuals of this
species congregate every year before migration to Eastern Africa (Anderson
2009). This was followed by Brachythemis contaminata(Fabricius, 1793) with 17% individuals found only in
urban and agricultural landscapes except a single record from one of the
streams in a forest area. Brachythemis contaminata is a dragonfly of polluted water, which was
seen abundantly where sewage is discharged. Interestingly, this species was observed
in one stream which is located near Mulshi Lake during one of the post-monsoon surveys. This stream near MulshiLake being a picnic spot attracts tourists during the monsoon and post-monsoon
season resulting in pollution of streams with organic waste. The species was recorded only when the
stream was polluted in post-monsoon.
The third most abundant
species was Trithemis festiva(Rambur, 1842) with 11% of individuals that were
recorded mostly from forested areas except a single record from one garden pond
in an urban area. Trithemis festiva is known to breed in sluggish streams and
usually perches on boulders and aquatic plants. This is a common species in the streams
of northern Western Ghats.
Species such as Diplacodes trivialis(Rambur, 1842), Orthetrum sabina (Drury, 1770), Trithemisaurora (Burmeister, 1839), Rhodischnura nursei (Morton, 1907) were locally abundant in
some of the study areas with less than 50 individuals in overall study
area. Whereas
species such as Vestalis apicalis (Rambur, 1842), Ceriagrion olivaceum(Laidlaw, 1916), Pseudagrion decorum (Rambur, 1842) were recorded only once (Fig 2).
Species such as Paragomphus lineatus Selys, 1850, Acisoma panorpoides Rambur, 1842, Gynacantha dravida Lieftinck, 1960, Gynacantha bayadera Selys, 1854, Tholymis tillagra Fabricius, 1798, Orthetrum chrysis Selys, 1891, Copera marginipes Rambur, 1842 and Neurothemis intermedia Rambur, 1842
were recorded from the sampling area but they were not encountered during
transect counts. This could
be due to their relative rarity or crepuscular flight activity.
Species Diversity and
Community Composition
Forest Landscapes: In forest streams a total of
21 species and 185 individuals were recorded. Trithemis festiva (Rambur, 1842)
was the dominant species with 66 individuals followed by Pantala flavescens (Fabricius,
1798) and Trithemis aurora (Burmeister, 1839) with 33 and 16 individuals
respectively. Species such as Vestalis gracilis (Rambur, 1842), Disparoneura quadrimaculata (Rambur,
1842) which usually occur in forested areas were also
recorded. Rhinocypha bisignata (Selys 1853),Vestalis apicalis(Selys 1873), Microgomphus torquatus (Selys,
1854), Neurothemis fulvia(Drury, 1773) were recorded only once from a single stream. Disparoneura quadrimaculata, Vestalis apicalis, Vestalis gracilis, Neurothemis fulviaare known to breed in streams and their geographic
restrictedness in the study area is due to the availability of suitable
breeding habitat. Vestalis gracilis, Vestalis apicalisand Rhinocypha bisignatawere observed from only two streams where canopy cover is greater than
50%. It was observed that the
abundance of these species were very low when compared with other species found
in forested streams and restricted to shaded areas of the stream. Another interesting observation was presence
of Microgomphus torquatus (Selys, 1854). This species was
originally described by Fraser from the Mula River in
Pune in 1933. Currently this
species was not encountered within the urban limits and now restricted to upper forested catchments of study area. This clearly indicates the change in
habitat of the riverine ecosystem of the region.
Of the eight families which were recorded from
the entire study area, species belonging to seven families were recorded from
forest streams. The family richness
was highest in forest streams; however they were represented by fewer
species. This high family richness
was observed only during post-monsoon season. Libellulidaewas the most abundant family due to presence of common wide-spreadspecies such as Trithemis festiva, Orthetrum pruinosum and Orthetrum taeniolatum. It was followed by Aeshnidaeand Protoneuridae. The families Calopterigidae, Chlorocyphidae, Gomphidae were all represented by fewer than five
individuals.
Agricultural Landscapes: In agricultural area, a total of 19 species and 137 individuals were
recorded from four sites. Agricultural land was also dominated by Pantala flavescens, which accounted for 40% individuals
followed by Brachythemis contaminata (20%) and Diplacodes trivialis (9%). The remainder of species found in
agricultural landscapes were of low abundance with fewer than 10
individuals. The species Potamarcha congener (Rambur,
1842) and Coenagrion dyeri(Fraser, 1924) were recorded only from one paddy field. Trithemis palidinervis was recorded only during the
pre-monsoon period. Lestes elatus was recorded during post-monsoon surveys from
paddy fields of Sinhagad Valley and large
congregation was seen during winter on the hill topsof Singhagad Valley. Rhodischnura nursei was recorded during winter only from Bhigwan located in the eastern part of the study area. This species is confined to semi-arid
zones of northwestern India (Fraser 1933) and usually
seen during September to November. However, nine individuals of this species were recorded from Bhigwan in January. Another species which was recorded only from Bhigwan is Coenagrion dyeri. This species is widely distributed in peninsular India and known to
breed in stagnant and weedy ponds and is often seen perching flat on floating
aquatic plants.
Urban Landscapes: A total of 287 individuals belonging to 32 species wasrecorded from urban areas. Brachythemis contaminata (Fabricius, 1793)
was the dominant species with 25% of individuals followed by Pantala flavescens andOrthetrum sabinawith 19% and 7% of individuals respectively. Species such as Orthetrum glaucum (Brauer, 1865)
and Pseudagrion decorum (Rambur, 1842) were recorded only once. The species such as Rhyothemis variegata and Pseudagrion rubriceps were recorded only from the College of
Military Engineering (CME) Lake and Tramea basiliariswas observed from Katraj Hill and from one of the
paddy fields from Tamhini Village. Across three land use types, there was a
difference between the species composition and, in terms of species richness, urban habitats were the most diverse followed by
forest and agricultural land. Simpson, Fisher’s alpha and Margalef indices
all show the same relationship (Table 3).
Seasonality
Species diversity and abundance varied across seasons with post-monsoon
being highest in species diversity as well as abundance. Many species have their flight period
during the post monsoon season and a high diversity of odonatesduring this season could be attributed to this. During the post-monsoon, 12 species from
agricultural land, 16 species from forest streams and 28 species from urban
habitats were recorded. The speciesPantala flavescens,Trithemis festivaand Brachythemis contaminatadominated all land use types.
The pre-monsoon season had the lowest species diversity and
abundance. During this season, a
total of four, eight and nine species were recorded from agriculture, forest
and urban areas, respectively. Brachythemis contaminata, Anax immaculifrons and Trithemisaurora dominated urban, forest and agriculture landscapes, respectively
during this season.
During winter, nine, 12 and 13 species were recorded from agriculture,
forest and urban areas, respectively. The species Rhodischnura nursei, Trithemis festiva, Brachythemis contaminanta dominated agricultural, forest and
urban landscapes, respectively during this season.
Species Turnover
Species turnover across land use types as measured by Jaccard’s index shows that urban and agricultural areas
have similar Odonata communities and they share about
38% of species. The odonate communities of forest streams were distinct and
they shared only 25 and 32 percent of odonate species with agricultural and urban landscapes,
respectively (Table 4). The
distinctiveness of forest stream odonate communities
was due to the presence of families such as Calopterygidae,Chlorocyphidae and Protoneuridaeas represented by Vestalis gracilis, V. apicalis, Rhinocypha bisignata and Disparoneura quadrimaculata, respectively. There were 11 species which were
observed from both urban and agricultural areas. Those species shared between
agricultural and urban land use types are common widespread species breeding in
a wide spectrum of wetland habitats. These landscapes are also undergoing similar human induced habitat
modifications due to disturbance.
Disturbance scores of study localities and species diversity shows that there is no clear relationship between species
diversity and disturbance (Table 5). Study sites with high disturbance scores such as the MuthaRiver also have high species diversity. Conversely, sites with low disturbance scores (e.g., Stream-4) reported
low species diversity. High diversity in some of the degraded areas are due to presence of common widespread species with
tolerance of disturbance and pollution. This shows that in this landscape over all, species diversity per se is
not a good indicator for assessment of wetland ecosystem health. Presence/absence of habitat specialist
species should be taken into consideration for monitoring wetland ecosystem
health.
Discussion
Fraser documented the fauna of Pune region while surveying the Odonata fauna of western India (Fraser 1924, 1932,
1933–36). Subsequently,
Prasad (1996) also documented the odonate fauna of
the region. These studies recorded
70 species of odonates from Pune (Appendix 2). Our current study and another in the
region conducted over two years (Subramanian & Talmale2010) recorded 46 species from transects and eight species outside
transects. The remaining 22 species
were not recorded even after repeated searching. Many of these species such as Anaciaeschna jaspidea,Anax guttatus,Epopthalmia vittata,Hemianax ephippigerand Macromia cingulata,
can still be found in nearby less disturbed areas such as Lonavala-Khandala,Karjat, Karad, etc. However, species such as Burmagomphus pyramidalis,Cyclogomphus heterostylus,Cyclogomphus vesiculosus,Cyclogomphus ypsilonand Cyclogomphus wilkinsi,
have not been recorded from Pune for a long time. These species are also not represented
in the National Zoological Collection, Western Regional Centre, Zoological
Survey of India, Pune which has been collecting odonates from the region for the past 50 years. This indicates that these species have
become locally extinct or have reached such low levels of population that they
cannot be detected by our sampling protocols.
The loss of 31% of odonates from this region
is alarming. Many species not
recorded such as Burmagomphus pyramidalis, Cyclogomphus heterostylus, Cyclogomphus ypsilon and Cyclogomphus wilkinsi, breed in and are closely associated
with unpolluted rivers and streams. In the last 50 years, the riverine ecosystems of the region have been
drastically altered. Seventeen dams
currently exist in this region supplying water for irrigation, housing,
industry and power generation. This catastrophic landscape and riverine ecosystem alteration over
the years almost certainly depauperated the odonate fauna. In agreement with our findings, remarkably similar results are also
reported for the fish fauna of Mula and Mutha rivers, where 30% of fish fauna was reported to be
lost in the past 60 years (Wagh & Ghate 2002). These results strongly indicate that landscape and riverine ecosystem
level impacts could have affected other freshwater biodiversity elements, which
need further investigation.
Our study shows that species turnover and abundance vary across seasons
and land use types in the study region. It is evident from this study that there is strong habitat and land use
association and seasonality in species richness whichis responsible for shaping the odonate community of
the region. Loss of regional odonate diversity could be attributed to major changes in
freshwater ecosystems, habitat loss and degradation of quality of available
habitats of the region. These
changes could have also had an effect on other freshwater biodiversity elements
and a cascading effect on terrestrial biodiversity. This link needs further study.
This result has important implications for developing long
term biomonitoring tools using odonates as surrogates. Seasonal and landscape variations in
species diversity needs to be taken into account while designing any landscape
level biodiversity monitoring programmes. Our study also emphasizes the importance of urban green spaces with
wetlands in conserving regional Odonata fauna. High diversity and abundance in urban
areas was mainly due to the CME campus where there is a network of man made
lakes and natural or semi-natural vegetation with minimal disturbance. Such
habitats are not only refugia for odonatesbut also for other flora and fauna. Hitherto about 25 species of trees, many species of herbs, aquatic plants,
butterflies, and 112 species of birds including migrants have been recorded
from CME campus. Moreover, the lakes of the CME are important wintering grounds
for a large number of resident and migratory water birds. Such green patches in the highly industrialized
and polluted landscape of the Pune region provide much needed refugiae for the biodiversity. Similar refugiaeneed to be identified in other urban centres in India and long
term protection needs to be provided for conserving regional biodiversity.
References
Alex Cordoba-Anguilar (ed.) (2008). Dragonflies and Damselflies for Ecological and
Evolutionary Research, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 290pp.
Anderson, R.C. (2009). Do dragonflies migrate
across the western Indian Ocean? Journal of Tropical Ecology 25:
347–348; http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0266467409006087
Dudgeon, D. (1994). Research strategies for the conservation and
management of tropical Asian streams and rivers. International
Journal of Ecology and Environment 20: 255–285.
Dudgeon, D. (2000). The Ecology of tropical Asian rivers and streams in
relation to biodiversity conservation. Annual
Review of Ecology and Systematics 31: 239–263.
Fraser, F.C. (1924). A Survey of the Odonate(Dragonfly) Fauna of Western India with Special Remarks on the Genera Macromia and Idionyxand Descriptions of Thirty New Species with Appendices I
& II. Records of The Indian Museum (A Journal
Of Indian Zoology). 26(5): 423–522.
Fraser, F.C. (1932). Additions to the survey
of odonate fauna of Western India, with descriptions
of nine new species. Records of the Indian Museum32: 443–474.
Fraser, F.C. (1933). The Fauna of British India including
Ceylon and Burma. Odonata Vol. I. Taylor and Francis Ltd.,
London, 423pp.
Fraser, F.C. (1934). The Fauna of British India including
Ceylon and Burma. Odonata Vol. II. Taylor and Francis Ltd., London, 398pp.
Fraser, F.C. (1936). The Fauna of British India including
Ceylon and Burma. Odonata Vol. III. Taylor and
Francis Ltd., London, 461pp
Hammer, O., D.A.T. Harper & P.D. Ryan (2001). PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and
Data Analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4(1):
9pp. <http://palaeoelectronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm>. Accessed 15 May 2012.
Molur, S., K.G.
Smith, B.A. Daniel & W.R.T. Darwall (Compilers)
(2011). The Status and
Distribution of Freshwater Biodversity in the Western
Ghats, India. IUCN, Cambridge, UK and Glad,
Switzerland and Zoo Outreach Organization, Coimbatore, India, 116pp.
Painter, D. (1999). Macroinvertebrate distributions and the conservation value of aquatic Coleoptera, Mollusca and Odonatain the ditches of traditionally managed and grazing fen at WickenFen, UK. Journal of Applied Ecology 36: 33–48; http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.1999.00376.x
Prasad, M. (1996). An account of the Odonata of Maharashtra State, India. Records of
Zoological Survey of India 95(3–4): 305–327.
Samways, M.J. (1992). Dragonfly conservation in South Africa: a
biogeographic perspective. Odonatologica 21(2): 165–180.
Samways, M.J. & N.S. Steytler(1996). Dragonfly (Odonata)
Distribution Patterns In Urban and Forest Landscapes and Recommendations for
Riparian Management, Biological Conservation 3207(96):
279–288; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(96)00032-8
Saunders, D.L., J.J. Meeuwig & A.C.J.
Vincent (2002). Freshwater protected areas: strategies for
conservation. Conservation Biology 16(1): 30–41; http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.99562.x
Subramanian, K.A. (2009). Damselflies
and Dragonflies of Peninsular India - A Field Guide. Vigyan Prasar, Department of Science and Technology, India, 118pp.
Subramanian, K.A. (2010). Report on biodiversity
and status of riverine ecosystems of the Western Ghats. Western
Ghats Ecology Expert Panel. <http://westernghatsindia.org/commissioned-papers>
Accessed on 10 July 2012.
Subramanian K.A., S. Ali & T.V. Ramachandra (2008). Odonata as indicators of riparian ecosystem health a case
study from south western Karnataka, India. Fraseria7: 83–95.
Subramanian, K.A. & S.S. Talmale (2010).Insect in Urban-Industrial Landscapes: A Case Study on Odonataand Lepidoptera (Rhopalocera: Insecta)
diversity of Pimpri-Chinchwad Muncipality,
Maharashtra. Proceedings: Impact of Climate Change on Biodiversity and
Challenges in Thar Desert. Desert
Regional Centre, Zoological Survey of India, Jodhpur, 73–78pp.
Subramanian, K.A., F. Kakkassery& M.V. Nair (2011). The
status and distribution of dragonflies and damselflies (Odonata)
of the Western Ghats, pp. 63–72. In: Molur,
S., K.G. Smith, B.A. Daniel & W.R.T. Darwall(comp.). The Status and Distribution of Freshwater Biodversity in the Western Ghats, India. IUCN, Cambridge, UK and Glad, Switzerland and Zoo Outreach
Organization, Coimbatore, India.
Wagh, G.K. & H.V. Ghate(2002). Freshwater fish fauna of rivers Mula and Mutha, Pune, Maharashtra. Zoos’ Print Journal18(1): 977–981; http://dx.doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.ZPJ.18.1.977-81
World Conservation Monitoring Centre (WCMC) (2000). Global Biodiversity: Earth’s living resources in the 21stCentury. By: B. Groombridge and M.D. Jenkins,
World Conservation Press, Cambridge, UK.