Journal of Threatened
Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 July 2025 | 17(7): 27300–27302
ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Print)
https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.9948.17.7.27300-27302
#9948 | Received 25 May 2025 | Final received 30 June 2025 | Finally
accepted 17 July 2025
Sighting of Royle’s
Pika Ochotona roylei
Ogilby, 1839 (Mammalia: Lagomorpha:
Ochotonidae) in Kishtwar
District, Jammu & Kashmir, India
Umar Mushtaq 1 & Kaleem Ahmed 2
1,2 Department of Wildlife Sciences,
Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh 202002, India.
1 umushtaq343@gmail.com, 2 kahmed.wl@amu.ac.in
(corresponding author)
Editor: Murali
Krishna Chatakonda, Amity University, Noida, India. Date
of publication: 26 July 2025 (online & print)
Citation: Mushtaq, U. & K. Ahmed (2025). Sighting of Royle’s Pika Ochotona roylei Ogilby, 1839
(Mammalia: Lagomorpha: Ochotonidae)
in Kishtwar District, Jammu & Kashmir, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 17(7): 27300–27302. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.9948.17.7.27300-27302
Copyright: © Mushtaq & Ahmed 2025. Creative Commons Attribution
4.0 International License. JoTT allows unrestricted
use, reproduction, and distribution of this article in any medium by providing
adequate credit to the author(s) and the source of publication.
Funding: None.
Competing interests: The authors
declare no competing interests.
Acknowledgements: The Authors
would like to thank the chairperson,
Department of Wildlife Sciences, Aligarh
Muslim University for providing all the
facilities needed to complete this research work. We extend gratitude to the
local communities throughout the field sites for their cooperation and help during the study.
Pikas Ochotona Link, 1795 are
small-sized mammals weighing around 100–175 g (Beever
2002). They have rounded ears, short legs, and lack a tail. Pikas
are native to Himalaya, the steppes of central Asia, and the mountains of
northwestern America (Prater 2005). Unique among the alpine mammals as they
gather up vegetation throughout summer including grasses, flowers, leaves,
evergreen pine needles, and even pine cones, and create a hay pile to sustain
throughout the winter, and maintain fecundity in early spring, rather than
hibernating or moving to lower elevations (Huntly et al. 1986; Dearing 1997;
Morrison & Hik 2007; Holtcamp
2010). At present there are 30 species of Ochotona found globally, with
seven species occurring in the Indian Himalayan region (Hoffmann & Smith
2005). Royle’s Pika Ochotona
roylei Ogilby, 1839, is
a common species in the Himalayan region (Hoffmann & Smith 2005). Their
body length varies 15–20 cm with a head diameter around 7 cm (Alfred et al.
2006). They can be found at 2,500–5,000 m in western Himalaya (Bhattacharya et
al. 2009), preferring open rocky grounds, and rhododendron forests (Tak & Lamba 1985). Their
distribution directly depends on the availability of forage plant species (Kawamichi 1968). According to IUCN Red List of Threatened
Species, the Royle’s Pika
is classified as ‘Least Concern’ (Smith & Bhattacharyya 2016) and as per
the IUCN Green Status of Species assessment information it is classified as
slightly depleted in 2021 (Bhattacharyya & Dahal
2021). Additionally it is listed under Schedule I of
Wildlife (Protection) Amendment Act, 2022 in India indicating highest
protection.
During our biodiversity survey
assessment on 03 January 2024 in a reserve forest of Upper Dool
area (Image 1) (33.3410 N, 75.8100 E), at an altitude of
2,411 m in Kishtwar, a Royle’s
Pika was sighted on a rock feeding on stems of
herbaceous plants and running around in between the rocks (Image 2). We
observed it for approximately 20 minutes. The species was identified based on
external characters using a standard field guide (Menon 2014). The site was
located within a coniferous forest habitat with huge rocks and boulders (Image
3). The ground cover consisted mostly of dried grasses due to the winter season.
Large fallen tree logs were present over the rocks. The dominant tree species
in the area were Cedrus deodara
and Pinus wallichiana.
The sighting of Royle’s Pika in the study area
confirms the presence of this elusive alpine mammal and highlights the
ecological significance of relatively understudied regions such as Kishtwar. This observation emphasizes the need for
comprehensive biodiversity assessments in these areas, which may harbour species that are otherwise overlooked. To better
understand the conservation status of Royle’s Pika, further research is needed, particularly studies
focusing on population trends, habitat preferences, anthropogenic pressures,
and the effects of climate change. Given that the Himalaya is among the most
climate-sensitive ecosystems globally, characterized by warmer winters,
increased summer precipitation, and accelerated glacial retreat (Shrestha et
al. 1999; Kulkarni & Karyakarte 2014), it is
possible that such environmental changes are already impacting small mammals
like Royle’s Pika. These
effects may remain undocumented due to limited scientific investigation in the
region.
FOR IMAGES
- - CLICK HERE FOR FULL PDF
References
Alfred,
J.R.B., A.K. Das & A.K. Sanyal (2006). Animals of India: Mammals.
Zoological Survey of India, 236 pp.
Beever, E.A. (2002). Persistence of Pikas in two low-elevation national monuments in the
western United States. U.S. National Park Service, 7 pp.
Bhattacharya,
S., B.S. Adhikari & G.S. Rawat (2009). Abundance of Royle’s
Pika (Ochotona roylei)
along an altitudinal gradient in Uttarakhand Western Himalaya. Hystrix Italian Journal of Mammalogy 20(2):
111–119. https://doi.org/10.4404/hystrix-20.2-4441
Bhattacharyya,
T. & S. Dahal (2021). Ochotona roylei
(Green status assessment). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2021: e.T41268A4126820251. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-3.RLTS.T41268A45184591.en.
Accessed on 24.v.2025.
Dearing, M.D.
(1997). The function
of haypiles of Pikas (Ochotona
princeps). Journal of Mammalogy 78(4): 1156–1163. https://doi.org/10.2307/1383058
Hoffmann,
R.S. & A.T. Smith (2005). Order Lagomorpha, pp. 185–211. In: Wilson,
D.E. & D.M. Reeder (eds.). Mammal Species of The World: A Taxonomic and
Geographic Reference. Johns Hopkins University Press, 2142 pp.
Holtcamp, W. (2010). Silence of the Pikas. Bio Science 60(1): 8–12. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2010.60.1.3
Huntly, N.,
A.T. Smith & B.L. Ivins (1986). Foraging behavior of the Pika (Ochotona princeps), with comparisons of
grazing versus haying. Journal of Mammalogy 67(1): 139–148. https://doi.org/10.2307/1381010
Kawamichi, T. (1968). Winter Behaviour
of the Himalayan Pika (Ochotona roylei). Journal of the Faculty of Science Hokkaido
University Series VI. Zoology 16: 582–554. http://hdl.handle.net/2115/27467
Kulkarni,
A.V. & Y. Karyakarte (2014). Observed changes in Himalayan
glaciers. Current Science 106(2): 237–244.
Menon, V.
(2014). Indian
Mammals: A Field Guide. Hachette India, 528 pp.
Morrison,
S.F. & D.S. Hik (2007). Demographic analysis of a
declining Pika population: Linking survival to
broad-scale climate patterns via spring snowmelt patterns. Journal of Animal
Ecology 76(5): 899–907. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01276.x
Prater, S.H.
(2005). The Book
of Indian Animals (3rd Ed.). Bombay Natural History
Society & Oxford University Press, 348 pp.
Shrestha,
A.B., C.P. Wake, P.A. Mayewski & J.E. Dibb (1999). Maximum temperature trends in the Himalaya and its
vicinity: an analysis based on temperature records from Nepal for the period
1971–94. Journal of Climate 12(9): 2775–2786. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012%3C2775:MTTITH%3E2.0.CO;2
Smith, A.T. &
S. Bhattacharyya (2016). Ochotona roylei. The IUCN
Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T41268A45184591.
https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-3.RLTS.T41268A45184591.en. Accessed
on 24.v.2025.
Tak, P.C. & B.S. Lamba (1985). Nanda Devi National Park: a contribution to its
mammalogy. Indian Journal of Forestry 8: 219–230.