Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 May 2025 | 17(5): 27007–27013

 

ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) 

https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.9462.17.5.27007-27013

#9462 | Received 26 October 2024 | Final received 05 May 2025 | Finally accepted 19 May 2025

 

 

Diversity and abundance of ants from tehsil Salooni of District Chamba, Himachal Pradesh: a research perspective to study ants as bioindicators

 

Joginder Singh Rilta 1   & Minalini Sharma 2       

 

1, 2 Department of Bio-Sciences, Himachal Pradesh University, Summer Hill, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh 171005, India.

1 joginderrilta516@gmail.com (corresponding author), 2 minalinisharma787@gmail.com  

 

 

Editor: Himender Bharti, Punjabi University, Patiala, India.            Date of publication: 26 May 2025 (online & print)

 

Citation: Rilta, J.S. & M. Sharma (2025). Diversity and abundance of ants from tehsil Salooni of District Chamba, Himachal Pradesh: a research perspective to study ants as bioindicators. Journal of Threatened Taxa 17(5): 27007–27013. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.9462.17.5.27007-27013

  

Copyright: © Rilta & Sharma 2025. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. JoTT allows unrestricted use, reproduction, and distribution of this article in any medium by providing adequate credit to the author(s) and the source of publication.

 

Funding: None.

 

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

 

Author details: Dr. Joginder Singh Rilta is an assistant professor in the Department of Bio-Sciences, Himachal Pradesh University, Summer Hill, Shimla and has 5 years of teaching and research experience. His research interests include ant taxonomy, ant diversity and ecological studies. He published 10 research papers and one book chapter. He served as the academic supervisor for this study.  Minalini Sharma is a student in the Department of Bio-Sciences, Himachal Pradesh University, Shimla. She holds a master’s degree in Zoology and has published one book chapter. She has a keen interest in ant diversity and ecological fieldwork.

 

Author contributions: JSR—Study design and article drafting; MS—field work.

 

Acknowledgements: Authors are highly thankful to Department of Bio-Sciences, Himachal Pradesh University, Summer Hill, Shimla for providing necessary facilities to carry out this work.

 

 

Abstract: This study evaluated the diversity and abundance of ants in Salooni Tehsil, Chamba District, Himachal Pradesh. Thirty species from five subfamilies were reported using different collection modules, including pitfall traps, baits, soil core, leaf litter, manual, and winkler method. Myrmicinae was the most diversified subfamily, with seven genera, while the genus Camponotus of the subfamily Formicinae was found to be most abundant with eight species. The study determined that the region is home to two invasive species (Monomorium pharaonsis and Trichomyrmex destructor). Due to which it is concluded that the area is prone to many anthropogenic activities, and in the near future, these invasive species can replace many native species of the region. This study also compiled functional groups of ants, which include generalised Myrmicinae, opportunists, subordinate Camponotinii, hot climate specialists, cold climate specialists, tropical climate specialists, cryptic species, and specialist predators. The richness of an environment is represented by the diversity of insects. Because ants maintain the stability of ecosystems, it is important to protect their habitats in order to increase biodiversity in the years to come. The data compiled here represents a turning point in the attempt to understand the geographic variety and dispersion of ant species and also the role of ants as bioindicators.

 

Keywords: Anthropogenic activities, biodiversity, bioindicator, cryptic species, ecosystem, functional group, invasive species, opportunists, specialist predators, tropical climate specialists.

 

 

 

Introduction

 

Ants are one of the most abundant and diverse groups of insects surviving on Earth. Ants exhibit intricate social behaviours and are present in nearly all terrestrial ecosystems, ranging from rainforests to deserts. Ants serve as efficient bioindicators as they are sensitive to environmental changes and are found in various kinds of environments. They react fast to disturbances such as habitat destruction, pollution, or climate change, making them important for monitoring ecosystem health. Ants are categorized as eusocial among social insects because of their traits, which include sharing generational responsibilities within the colony, and cooperative brood care. Ants are identified as three separate castes: male, female (queen), and sterile workers (Wilson 1971).

Ants are classified as members of the Formicidae family and order Hymenoptera. Among all eusocial insects, ants have the highest ecological dominance (Ward et al. 2015). As of now, 22 subfamilies, 505 genera, and 16,856 valid species of ants are recognized globally (Bolton 2025). These are represented by 10 subfamilies distributed across 108 genera and 865 species in India (Bharti 2025).  In recent years, many scientists worldwide have studied the ant fauna. Bharti (2008) compiled a comprehensive checklist and taxonomic review of Indian ant fauna from the Himalayan and sub-Himalayan regions. Their findings include 115 ant species out of 202 crossed an altitude of 2,000 metres; 71 species out of these 115 are endemic to Himalaya. Bharti et al. (2016a) provided a comprehensive and critical list of Indian ant species with up-to-date state-wise distribution. Bharti et al. (2016b) conducted research on ants as bioindicators in Shivalik mountains of Himalayas. A total of 181 species spanning across 59 genera were recorded from Shivalik ranges.  Bharti et al. (2017) represented one of the most comprehensive surveys of ant fauna in northwestern Shivalik region. In this study, 179 species group taxa were listed for 61 genera belonging to eight subfamilies. A total of 828 valid species and subspecies names belonging to 100 genera were listed from India.  Neupane & Subedi (2018)  studied the diversity of ants in the winter and summer seasons in the area of Shivapuri–Nagarjun National Park (SNNP). Using various sampling methods, a total of 817 individual ants, belonging to five sub-families, 16 genera, and 23 morphospecies, were reported. Fontanilla et al. (2019) conducted research on taxonomic and functional ant diversity and identified a total of 263 species in southwestern China. Castro et al. (2020) examined three dimensions of the taxonomic (TD) and functional (FD) (α and β) diversities of ants in a mountainous environment. Brassard et al. (2021) investigated high ant diversity in urban areas. Schmidt et al. (2022) conducted research on ant diversity studies in Brazil and suggested that a global perspective on diversity studies may be achieved by recreating their work in different parts of the world. Li et al. (2023) examined ant species diversity in the central and northern parts of the western Sichuan Plateau in China. A total of 22,645 ant specimens representing 40 species grouped in 18 genera and four subfamilies were collected. Laakel et al. (2024) compiled an ant inventory in Bejaia city urban and suburban areas in order to address the demand for further data regarding ant biodiversity in Algeria’s urban environment. Rilta & Sharma (2024) conducted research focused on the diversity and abundance of ants from the tehsil Nerwa of  Shimla District. A total of 33 species belonging to 22 genera of four subfamilies were collected. Rilta & Narwal (2025) presented research work focused on ant diversity and community composition from north-western Himalayas. A total of 35 species of ants belonging to 22 genera, and five subfamilies were recorded.

Comprehensive and extensive data were collected on the diversity and abundance of ants with the aim to investigate local ant fauna in the study area and the role of ants as bioindicators.

 

 

Materials and Methods

 

Study area

Salooni is a tehsil that is located in the district Chamba, which is at an  altitude of 1,829 m. The tehsil is surrounded by the Pir Panjal in the north and the Dhaula Dhar ranges in the south. It provides magnificent sights of the gushing river and snow-capped mountains. The study area is located between 32.500–33.000 0N & 75.750–76.250 0E. The human population of the area is 81,556, distributed across 576.5 km2 (Vaid & Pathania 2024). There is an abundance of flora and fauna in the valley, which highlights its rich biodiversity. This field has not yet been the subject of any prior research.

Collection tours have been conducted to various localities falling in the tehsil Salooni. The sampling was carried out for three months accounting for both the summer and winter seasons. Localities covered during these tours are labelled in the maps (Figure 1).

 

Sampling method

For collection of material, all protocol proposed by Agosti et al. (2000) have been followed, which includes:

Mini Winkler sacs having wire sieve with square holes of 1×1 cm were used to collect ants from leaf litter. Ants were extracted from sifted litter after a period of 48 hours.

Pitfall traps consisting of test tubes were used. Each test tube was partly filled with 5% ethylene glycol solution, and was buried with the rim flush with the soil surface.

Arboreal baits were used for sampling of tree ants.

The soil core method was used for hypogaeic ants, where soil cores, each of 20 × 20 × 15 cm depth, were taken. These were sifted through a hand sieve pan to collect ants.

Beating vegetation method (to dislodge ants from vegetation onto sheets) was also carried out.

Light trap, which consisted of a white sheet, and fluorescent bulb was used for the collection of reproductive castes of ants.

Finally, the ants were also collected by hand picking method,  by searching rotten logs, stumps, dead & live branches, twigs, low vegetation, and termite mounds.

 

Collection preservation and identification

Both morning and evening hours were used to collect ant samples (Gadagkar et al. 1993). The collected material was preserved using 90% alcohol. The ant specimens were then mounted on triangles for research in accordance with accepted practices in ant taxonomy. To aid in identification, their legs were moved ventrally, away from the body, and the mandibles of certain specimens were opened. The ants were then point mounted on triangle “points” on their right side, between the mesocoxa, and metacoxa. Following their separation from debris and mounting, these specimens were appropriately labelled with the following details: Country, state, location, date, method of collection, and ecological data. All the collected material was identified up to species level with the help of Linnaeus (1758), Fabricius (1787), Foerster (1850), Jerdon (1851), Smith (1858), Mayr (1862), Mayr (1879), Emery (1895), Forel (1902), Bingham (1903), Forel (1904), Donisthorpe (1938), Menozzi (1939) Bolton (1994), Bharti & Wachkoo (2013), Bharti et al. (2016a), Bharti (2024), Bolton (2024), and then compared with the reference collection already hosted in the laboratory.

The taxonomic analysis was conducted on RSMr-10 stereo zoom microscope. Relevant data has been attached to the arranged catalogue of the acquired content. Voucher specimens have been deposited in the Himachal Pradesh University Ant Collection (HPUAC) in Shimla, India.

 

 

Results

 

A total of 646 ant specimens (Figure 3) representing 30 species, belonging to 19 genera of five subfamilies (Figure 2) were collected (Table 1). In this study subfamily Formicinae and Myrmicinae contributed highest in terms of number of species and number of specimens (Figure 4,5). The study also accounts list of two introduced species (Table 2). The ant fauna prevalent in the region is highly diverse. The study also compiled functional groups of ants in this study, which include generalised Myrmicinae, opportunists, subordinate Camponotinii, hot climate specialists, cold climate specialists, tropical climate specialists, cryptic species, and specialist predators (Table 3). The study also mentions the species of ant that has already been reported from higher regions of Himachal Pradesh (Table 4).

 

 

Discussion

 

The primary findings of the study are the various ant species and records of invasive species, importance of the area’s diverse biodiversity. Nonetheless, the existence of invasive species also creates a sense of unease that is common among local ants. Monitoring their spread provides valuable information about environmental degradation, particularly in rapidly urbanizing or agriculturally expanding regions (Andersen 1995). An analysis was conducted on the functional group structure of ants inhabiting the area and proposed the ant functional group concept, which shows how ants respond to stressful circumstances and disruptions of environment at a biogeographical scale to identify them as bio-indicators of anthropogenic problems at local scales. The findings of this study reinforce the utility of ants in monitoring environmental changes, particularly in relation to habitat disturbance, pollution and land-use transformation. This approach, which has been in use more recently elsewhere in the world (Andersen 1997), includes the following groups of ants (Table 3). An abundance of ant species has flourished as a result of topographic changes, former climatic regimes, and present-day microclimatic fluctuations. The resulting biodiversity is likely to exhibit a greater level of specialization and environmental adaptation.

 

Table 1. List of ants collected from tehsil Salooni.

Subfamilies: 5, Genera: 19, Species: 30

Dorylinae

Aenictus

Aenictus peguensis (Emery, 1895)

 

Formicinae

Camponotus

Camponotus albosparsus Bingham, 1903

 

Camponotus arrogans (Smith, 1858)

 

Camponotus compressus (Fabricius, 1787)

 

Camponotus kattensis Bingham, 1903

 

Camponotus nirvanae Forel, 1893

 

Camponotus oblongus (Smith, 1858)

 

Camponotus opaciventris Mayr, 1879

 

Camponotus sp. minor

 

Formica

Formica polyctena Foerster, 1850

 

Lepisiota

Lapisiota lunaris (Emery, 1893)

 

Polyrhachis

Polyrhachis menelas Forel, 1904

 

Lasius

Lasius himalayans Bingham, 1903

 

Myrmicinae

Aphaenogaster

Aphaenogaster JR01

 

Aphaenogaster smythiesii Forel, 1902

 

Crematogaster

Crematogaster brunnaea contemta Mayr, 1879

 

Crematogaster sagei Forel, 1902

 

Messor

Messor himalayanus (Forel, 1902)

 

Monomorium

Monomorium pharaonsis (Linnaeus, 1758)

 

Myrmica

Myrmica aimonissabaudiae Menozzi, 1939

 

Myrmica smythiesii Forel, 1902

 

Pheidole

Pheidole indica Mayr, 1879

 

Pheidole spathifera aspatha Forel, 1902

 

Trichomyrmex

Trichomyrmex destructor (Jerdon, 1851)

 

Ponerinae

Anochetus

Anochetus cryptus Bharti & Wachkoo, 2013

 

Brachyoponera

Brachyoponera luteipus (Mayr, 1862)

 

Leptogenys

Leptogenys lucidula Emery, 1895

 

Odontoponera

Odontoponera denticulata (Smith, 1858)

 

Pseudoneoponera

Pseudoneoponera rufipes (Jerdon, 1851)

 

Pseudomyrmecinae

Tetraponera

Tetraponera rufonigra (Jerdon, 1851)

 

 

Table 2. List of invasive ant species of tehsil Salooni.

Species

Invasive species

Monomorium pharaonsis (Linnaeus, 1758)

Introduced

Trichomyrmex destructor (Jerdon, 1851)

Introduced

 

 

Table 3. Different functional groups including their respective genus.

Functional groups

Genus

Generalised Myrmicinae

Crematogaster

Messor

Monomorium

Pheidole

Opportunists

Odontoponera

Myrmica

Lepisiota

Formica                                           

Aphaenogaster

Subordinate Camponotini

Polyrhachis

Camponotus

Hot climate specialists

Monomorium

Cold climate specialists

Monomorium

Lasius

Tropical climate specialists

Aenictus

Tetraponera

Cryptic species

Lepisiota

Specialist predators

Anochetus

Leptogenys

 

Table 4. List of ant species that has already been reported from higher regions of Himachal Pradesh.

Species name

Location

References

Camponotus albosparsus

Himalayan Region, Nerwa

Bharti (2008), Rilta & Sharma  (2024)

Camponotus kattensis

Himalayan region, Nerwa, Shimla

Bharti (2008), Rilta & Sharma (2024), Rilta & Narwal (2025)

Camponotus compressus

Himalayan region, Andretta, Bakhra, Kotla

 Bharti (2008), Bharti et al. (2017)

Crematogaster sagei

Himalayan Region, Nerwa, Shimla

Bharti (2008), Rilta & Sharma (2024), Rilta & Narwal (2025)

Monomorium pharaonsis

Himalayan Region, Chanaur, Renuka, Guga, Shivalik region, Nerwa

Bharti (2008), Bharti et al. (2016b), Bharti et al. (2017), Rilta & Sharma (2024)

Leptogenys lucidula

Himalayan Region, Shimla

Bharti (2008), Rilta & Narwal (2025)

Lasius himalayans

Himalayan Region, Shimla

Bharti (2008), Rilta & Narwal (2025)

Messor himalayanus

Himalayan region, Andretta, Bilaspur, Mandi, Nerwa, Shimla

Bharti (2008), Bharti et al. (2017), Rilta and Sharma (2024), Rilta & Narwal (2025)

Myrmica smythiesii

Himalayan region

Bharti (2008)

Myrmica aimonissabaudiae

Himalayan region

Bharti (2008)

Tetraponera rufonigra

Himalayan region

Bharti (2008)

Aphaenogaster cavernicola

Himalayan region

Bharti (2008)

Aphaenogaster smythiesii

Himalayan region, Shimla

Bharti (2008), Rilta & Narwal (2025)

Pheidole indica

Himalayan Region, Una, Terrace, Nerwa, Shimla

Bharti (2008), Bharti et al. (2017), Rilta & Sharma (2024), Rilta & Narwal (2025)

 

 

For figures - - click here for full PDF

 

 

References

 

Agosti, D., J.D. Majer, L.E. Alonso & T.R. Schultz (2000). Standard Methods for Measuring and Monitoring Biodiversity. Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC, 204–206 pp.

Andersen, A.N. (1995). A classification of Australian ant communities based on functional groups which parallel plant life-forms in relation to stress and disturbance. Journal of Biogeography 22: 15–29.

Andersen, A.N. (1997). Using ants as bioindicators: multiscale issues in ant community ecology. Conservation Ecology 1: 1–17.

Bharti, H. (2025). Indian ants. http://www.antweb.org/india.jsp. Accessed online at 14 May 2025.

Bharti, H. & A.A. Wachkoo (2013). Cerapachys browni and Cerapachys costatus, two new rare ant species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from India. Biologia 68: 1189–1192.

Bharti, H., B. Guénard, M. Bharti & E.P. Economo (2016a). An updated checklist of the ants of India with their specific distributions in Indian states (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). ZooKeys 551: 1–83.

Bharti, H., M. Bharti & M. Pfeiffer (2016b). Ants as bioindicators of ecosystem health in Shivalik Mountains of Himalayas: Assessment of species diversity and invasive species. Asian Myrmecology 8: 1–8.

Bharti, H., A.A. Wachkoo & R. Kumar (2017). First Inventory of Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in northwestern Shivalik, India. Halteres 8: 33–68.

Bharti, H. (2008). Altitudinal Diversity of Ants in Himalayan Regions (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 52(2): 305–322.

Bingham, C.T. (1903). The fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma. Hymenoptera, Vol. II. Ants and Cuckoo-wasps. Taylor and Francis, London, 506 pp.

Bolton, B. (1994). Identification Guide to the Ant Genera of the World. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 222 pp.

Bolton, B. (2025). An online catalogue of the ants of the world: AntCat. http://www.antcat.org/accessed on 14 May 2025.

Brassard, F., C.M. Leong, H.H. Chan & B. Guénard (2021). High diversity in urban areas: How comprehensive sampling reveals high ant species richness within one of the most urbanized regions of the world. Diversity 13(8): 358.

Castro, F.S.D., P.G. da Silva, R. Solar, G.W. Fernandes & F.D.S. Neves (2020). Environmental drivers of taxonomic and functional diversity of ant communities in a tropical mountain. Insect Conservation and Diversity 13(4): 393–403.

Donisthorpe, H. (1938). New species of ants and a new subgenus of Dolichoderus from various localities. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 2: 498–504.

Emery, C. (1895). Viaggio di Leonardo Fea in Birmania e regioni vicine. LXIII. Formiche di Birmania del Tenasserim e dei Monti Carin raccolte da L. Fea. Parte II. Annali del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale 2: 450–483.

Fabricius, J.C. (1787). Mantissa insectorum sistens eorum species nuper detectas adiectis characteribus, genericis, differentiis, specificis, emendationibus, observationibus. Tome I. Hafniae [= Copenhagen]: C. G. Proft, 348.

Foerster, A. (1850). Hymenopterologische Studien. 1. Formicariae. Ernst Ter Meer, Aachen, 74 pp.

Fontanilla, A.M., A. Nakamura, Z. Xu, M. Cao, R.L. Kitching, Y. Tang & C.J. Burwell (2019). Taxonomic and functional ant diversity along tropical, subtropical, and subalpine elevational transects in Southwest China. Insects 10(5): 128.

Forel, A. (1902). Myrmicinae nouveaux de l’Inde et de Ceylan. Revue Suisse de Zoologie 10: 165–249.

Forel, A. (1904). Miscellanea myrmécologiques. Revue Suisse de Zoologie 12: 1–52.

Gadagkar, R., P. Nair & D.M. Bhat (1993). Ant species richness and diversity in some selected localities in Western Ghat, India. Hexopoda 5(2): 79–94.

Jerdon, T.C. (1851). A catalogue of the species of ants found in Southern India. Madras Journal of Literature and Science 17: 103–127.

Laakel, N., L. Aissat, L. Bounab & C. Yahiaoui (2024). Diversity and species composition of ants in urban and suburban environments in Bejaia City (Algeria). Sociobiology 71(2): e9698. https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v71i2.9698

Li, Z.Y., Z.H. Xu, X.M. Zhang, T. Li, X.D. Yin & J.H. Duan (2023). Ant species diversity in the central and northern parts of the western Sichuan Plateau in China. Diversity 15(8): 935. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15080935

Linnaeus, C. (1758). Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Tomus I. Editio decima, reformata. Holmiae [= Stockholm]: L. Salvii, 824 pp.

Mayr, G. (1862). Myrmecologische Studien. Verhandlungen der Kaiserlich-Königlichen Zoologisch-Botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien 12: 649–776.

Mayr, G. (1879). Beitrage zur Ameisen- Fauna Asiens. Verhandlungen der Kaiserlich-Königlichen Zoologisch-Botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien 28: 645–686.

Menozzi, C. (1939). Formiche dell’Himalaya e del Karakorum raccolte dalla Spedizione italiana comandata da S. A. R. il Duca di Spoleto. Atti della Società Italiana di Scienze Naturali e del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano 78: 285–345.

Neupane, P. & I.P. Subedi (2018). Ant diversity in Muhan Pokhari area of Shivapuri-Nagarjun National Park, Nepal. Journal of Natural History Museum 30: 180–191.

Rilta, J.S. & N. Narwal (2025). Ant Diversity and Community Composition from North-West Himalayas. Halteres 15(1): 1–12.

Rilta, J.S. & D. Sharma (2024). Diversity and Abundance of Ants from Tehsil Nerwa of District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India. Uttar Pradesh Journal of Zoology 45(21): 94–105.

Schmidt, F.A., C.R. Ribas, R.M. Feitosa, F.B. Baccaro, A.C.M. de Queiroz, T.G. Sobrinho & F. Martello (2022). Ant diversity studies in Brazil: an overview of the myrmecological research in a megadiverse country. Insectes Sociaux 69(1): 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-022-00848-6

Vaid, T. & S.S. Pathania (2024). Land Use-Land Cover Changes and Associated Drivers: A case of Salooni Block of Chamba. Current World Environment 19(1): 491. https://doi.org/10.12944/CWE.19.1.40

Ward, P.S., S.G. Brady, B.L. Fisher & T.R. Schultz (2015). The evolution of myrmicinae ants: phylogeny and biogeography of a hyperdiverse ant clade (hymenoptera: Formicidae). Systematic Entomology 40(1): 61–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12090

Wilson, E.O. (1971). The Insect Societies. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 548 pp.