Journal of Threatened
Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 May 2025 | 17(5): 27007–27013
ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Print)
https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.9462.17.5.27007-27013
#9462 | Received 26 October 2024 | Final received 05 May 2025 | Finally
accepted 19 May 2025
Diversity and
abundance of ants from tehsil Salooni of District Chamba, Himachal Pradesh: a
research perspective to study ants as bioindicators
Joginder Singh Rilta 1 & Minalini Sharma 2
1, 2 Department of Bio-Sciences,
Himachal Pradesh University, Summer Hill, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh 171005,
India.
1 joginderrilta516@gmail.com
(corresponding author), 2 minalinisharma787@gmail.com
Editor: Himender Bharti, Punjabi University,
Patiala, India. Date of publication: 26 May 2025
(online & print)
Citation: Rilta,
J.S. & M. Sharma (2025). Diversity and abundance of ants from
tehsil Salooni of District Chamba, Himachal Pradesh: a research perspective to
study ants as bioindicators. Journal of
Threatened Taxa 17(5):
27007–27013. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.9462.17.5.27007-27013
Copyright: © Rilta & Sharma 2025. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
JoTT allows unrestricted use, reproduction, and distribution of this article in
any medium by providing adequate credit to the author(s) and the source of
publication.
Funding:
None.
Competing interests:
The authors declare no competing interests.
Author details: Dr. Joginder Singh Rilta is an assistant
professor in the Department of Bio-Sciences, Himachal Pradesh University,
Summer Hill, Shimla and has 5 years of teaching and research experience. His
research interests include ant taxonomy, ant diversity and ecological studies.
He published 10 research papers and one book chapter. He served as the academic
supervisor for this study. Minalini Sharma is a student in the
Department of Bio-Sciences, Himachal Pradesh University, Shimla. She holds a
master’s degree in Zoology and has published one book chapter. She has a keen
interest in ant diversity and ecological fieldwork.
Author contributions: JSR—Study
design and article drafting; MS—field work.
Acknowledgements: Authors are highly thankful to
Department of Bio-Sciences, Himachal Pradesh University, Summer Hill, Shimla
for providing necessary facilities to carry out this work.
Abstract: This study evaluated the
diversity and abundance of ants in Salooni Tehsil, Chamba District, Himachal
Pradesh. Thirty species from five subfamilies were reported using different
collection modules, including pitfall traps, baits, soil core, leaf litter,
manual, and winkler method. Myrmicinae was the most diversified subfamily, with
seven genera, while the genus Camponotus of the subfamily Formicinae was
found to be most abundant with eight species. The study determined that the
region is home to two invasive species (Monomorium pharaonsis and Trichomyrmex
destructor). Due to which it is concluded that the area is prone to many
anthropogenic activities, and in the near future, these invasive species can
replace many native species of the region. This study also compiled functional
groups of ants, which include generalised Myrmicinae, opportunists, subordinate
Camponotinii, hot climate specialists, cold climate specialists, tropical
climate specialists, cryptic species, and specialist predators. The richness of
an environment is represented by the diversity of insects. Because ants maintain
the stability of ecosystems, it is important to protect their habitats in order
to increase biodiversity in the years to come. The data compiled here
represents a turning point in the attempt to understand the geographic variety
and dispersion of ant species and also the role of ants as bioindicators.
Keywords: Anthropogenic activities,
biodiversity, bioindicator, cryptic species, ecosystem, functional group,
invasive species, opportunists, specialist predators, tropical climate
specialists.
Introduction
Ants are one of the most
abundant and diverse groups of insects surviving on Earth. Ants
exhibit intricate social behaviours and are present in nearly all
terrestrial ecosystems, ranging from rainforests to deserts. Ants serve as
efficient bioindicators as they are sensitive to environmental changes and are
found in various kinds of environments. They react fast to disturbances such as
habitat destruction, pollution, or climate change, making them important for
monitoring ecosystem health. Ants are categorized as eusocial among social
insects because of their traits, which include sharing generational
responsibilities within the colony, and cooperative brood care. Ants are
identified as three separate castes: male, female (queen), and sterile workers
(Wilson 1971).
Ants are classified as members of
the Formicidae family and order Hymenoptera. Among all eusocial insects, ants
have the highest ecological dominance (Ward et al. 2015). As of now, 22
subfamilies, 505 genera, and 16,856 valid species of ants are recognized
globally (Bolton 2025). These are represented by 10 subfamilies distributed
across 108 genera and 865 species in India (Bharti 2025). In recent years, many scientists worldwide
have studied the ant fauna. Bharti (2008) compiled a comprehensive checklist
and taxonomic review of Indian ant fauna from the Himalayan and sub-Himalayan
regions. Their findings include 115 ant species out of 202 crossed an altitude
of 2,000 metres; 71 species out of these 115 are endemic to Himalaya. Bharti et
al. (2016a) provided a comprehensive and critical list of Indian ant species with up-to-date
state-wise distribution. Bharti et al. (2016b) conducted research on ants as
bioindicators in Shivalik mountains of Himalayas. A total of 181 species
spanning across 59 genera were recorded from Shivalik ranges. Bharti et al. (2017) represented one of the
most comprehensive surveys of ant fauna in northwestern Shivalik region. In
this study, 179 species group taxa were listed for 61 genera belonging to eight
subfamilies. A total of 828 valid species and subspecies names belonging to 100
genera were listed from India. Neupane & Subedi (2018) studied the diversity of ants in the winter and summer seasons in the
area of Shivapuri–Nagarjun National Park (SNNP). Using various sampling
methods, a total of 817 individual ants, belonging to five sub-families, 16
genera, and 23 morphospecies, were reported. Fontanilla et al. (2019) conducted
research on taxonomic and functional ant diversity and identified a total of
263 species in southwestern China. Castro et al. (2020) examined three
dimensions of the taxonomic (TD) and functional (FD) (α and β) diversities of
ants in a mountainous environment. Brassard et al. (2021) investigated high ant
diversity in urban areas. Schmidt et al. (2022) conducted research on ant
diversity studies in Brazil and suggested that a global perspective on
diversity studies may be achieved by recreating their work in different parts
of the world. Li et al. (2023) examined ant species diversity in the central
and northern parts of the western Sichuan Plateau in China. A total of 22,645
ant specimens representing 40 species grouped in 18 genera and four subfamilies
were collected. Laakel et al. (2024) compiled an ant inventory in Bejaia city
urban and suburban areas in order to address the demand for further data
regarding ant biodiversity in Algeria’s urban environment. Rilta & Sharma
(2024) conducted research focused on the diversity and abundance of ants from
the tehsil Nerwa of Shimla District. A
total of 33 species belonging to 22 genera of four subfamilies were collected.
Rilta & Narwal (2025) presented research work focused on ant diversity and
community composition from north-western Himalayas. A total of 35 species of
ants belonging to 22 genera, and five subfamilies were recorded.
Comprehensive and extensive data
were collected on the diversity and abundance of ants with the aim to
investigate local ant fauna in the study area and the role of ants as
bioindicators.
Materials
and Methods
Study area
Salooni is a tehsil that is
located in the district Chamba, which is at an
altitude of 1,829 m. The tehsil is surrounded by the Pir Panjal in the
north and the Dhaula Dhar ranges in the south. It provides magnificent sights
of the gushing river and snow-capped mountains. The study area is located
between 32.500–33.000 0N & 75.750–76.250 0E. The human population of the area
is 81,556, distributed across 576.5 km2 (Vaid & Pathania 2024).
There is an abundance of flora and fauna in the valley, which highlights its
rich biodiversity. This field
has not yet been the subject of any prior research.
Collection tours have been
conducted to various localities falling in the tehsil Salooni. The sampling was
carried out for three months accounting for both the summer and winter seasons.
Localities covered during these tours are labelled in the maps (Figure 1).
Sampling method
For collection of material, all
protocol proposed by Agosti et al. (2000) have been followed, which includes:
Mini Winkler sacs having wire
sieve with square holes of 1×1 cm were used to collect ants from leaf litter.
Ants were extracted from sifted litter after a period of 48 hours.
Pitfall traps consisting of test
tubes were used. Each test tube was partly filled with 5% ethylene glycol
solution, and was buried with the rim flush with the soil surface.
Arboreal baits were used for
sampling of tree ants.
The soil core method was used for
hypogaeic ants, where soil cores, each of 20 × 20 × 15 cm depth, were taken.
These were sifted through a hand sieve pan to collect ants.
Beating vegetation method (to
dislodge ants from vegetation onto sheets) was also carried out.
Light trap, which consisted of a
white sheet, and fluorescent bulb was used for the collection of reproductive
castes of ants.
Finally, the ants were also
collected by hand picking method, by
searching rotten logs, stumps, dead & live branches, twigs, low vegetation,
and termite mounds.
Collection preservation and
identification
Both morning and evening hours
were used to collect ant samples (Gadagkar et al. 1993). The collected material
was preserved using 90% alcohol. The ant specimens were then mounted on
triangles for research in accordance with accepted practices in ant taxonomy.
To aid in identification, their legs were moved ventrally, away from the body,
and the mandibles of certain specimens were opened. The ants were then point
mounted on triangle “points” on their right side, between the mesocoxa, and
metacoxa. Following their separation from debris and mounting, these specimens
were appropriately labelled with the following details: Country, state,
location, date, method of collection, and ecological data. All the collected
material was identified up to species level with the help of Linnaeus (1758),
Fabricius (1787), Foerster (1850), Jerdon (1851), Smith (1858), Mayr (1862),
Mayr (1879), Emery (1895), Forel (1902), Bingham (1903), Forel (1904),
Donisthorpe (1938), Menozzi (1939) Bolton (1994), Bharti & Wachkoo (2013),
Bharti et al. (2016a), Bharti (2024), Bolton (2024), and then compared with the
reference collection already hosted in the laboratory.
The taxonomic analysis was
conducted on RSMr-10 stereo zoom microscope. Relevant data has been attached to
the arranged catalogue of the acquired content. Voucher specimens have been
deposited in the Himachal Pradesh University Ant Collection (HPUAC) in Shimla,
India.
Results
A total of 646 ant specimens
(Figure 3) representing 30 species, belonging to 19 genera of five subfamilies
(Figure 2) were collected (Table 1). In this study subfamily Formicinae and
Myrmicinae contributed highest in terms of number of species and number of specimens
(Figure 4,5). The study also accounts list of two introduced species (Table 2).
The ant fauna prevalent in the region is highly diverse. The study also
compiled functional groups of ants in this study, which include generalised
Myrmicinae, opportunists, subordinate Camponotinii, hot climate specialists,
cold climate specialists, tropical climate specialists, cryptic species, and
specialist predators (Table 3). The study also mentions the species of ant that has already been
reported from higher regions of Himachal Pradesh (Table 4).
Discussion
The primary findings of the study
are the various ant species and records of invasive species, importance of the
area’s diverse biodiversity. Nonetheless, the existence of invasive species
also creates a sense of unease that is common among local ants. Monitoring
their spread provides valuable information about environmental degradation,
particularly in rapidly urbanizing or agriculturally expanding regions
(Andersen 1995). An analysis was conducted on the functional group structure of
ants inhabiting the area and proposed the ant functional group concept, which
shows how ants respond to stressful circumstances and disruptions of
environment at a biogeographical scale to identify them as bio-indicators of
anthropogenic problems at local scales. The findings of this study reinforce
the utility of ants in monitoring environmental changes, particularly in
relation to habitat disturbance, pollution and land-use transformation. This
approach, which has been in use more recently elsewhere in the world (Andersen
1997), includes the following groups of ants (Table 3). An abundance of ant
species has flourished as a result of topographic changes, former climatic
regimes, and present-day microclimatic fluctuations. The resulting biodiversity
is likely to exhibit a greater level of specialization and
environmental adaptation.
Table 1. List of ants collected from tehsil Salooni.
|
Subfamilies: 5, Genera: 19,
Species: 30 |
|||
|
Dorylinae |
Aenictus |
Aenictus peguensis (Emery, 1895) |
|
|
Formicinae |
Camponotus |
Camponotus albosparsus Bingham, 1903 |
|
|
Camponotus arrogans (Smith, 1858) |
|
||
|
Camponotus compressus (Fabricius, 1787) |
|
||
|
Camponotus kattensis Bingham, 1903 |
|
||
|
Camponotus nirvanae Forel, 1893 |
|
||
|
Camponotus oblongus (Smith, 1858) |
|
||
|
Camponotus opaciventris Mayr, 1879 |
|
||
|
Camponotus sp. minor |
|
||
|
Formica |
Formica polyctena Foerster, 1850 |
|
|
|
Lepisiota |
Lapisiota lunaris (Emery, 1893) |
|
|
|
Polyrhachis |
Polyrhachis menelas Forel, 1904 |
|
|
|
Lasius |
Lasius himalayans Bingham, 1903 |
|
|
|
Myrmicinae |
Aphaenogaster |
Aphaenogaster JR01 |
|
|
Aphaenogaster smythiesii Forel, 1902 |
|
||
|
Crematogaster |
Crematogaster brunnaea contemta Mayr, 1879 |
|
|
|
Crematogaster sagei Forel, 1902 |
|
||
|
Messor |
Messor himalayanus (Forel, 1902) |
|
|
|
Monomorium |
Monomorium pharaonsis (Linnaeus, 1758) |
|
|
|
Myrmica |
Myrmica aimonissabaudiae Menozzi, 1939 |
|
|
|
Myrmica smythiesii Forel, 1902 |
|
||
|
Pheidole |
Pheidole indica Mayr, 1879 |
|
|
|
Pheidole spathifera aspatha Forel, 1902 |
|
||
|
Trichomyrmex |
Trichomyrmex destructor (Jerdon, 1851) |
|
|
|
Ponerinae |
Anochetus |
Anochetus cryptus Bharti &
Wachkoo, 2013 |
|
|
Brachyoponera |
Brachyoponera luteipus (Mayr, 1862) |
|
|
|
Leptogenys |
Leptogenys lucidula Emery, 1895 |
|
|
|
Odontoponera |
Odontoponera denticulata (Smith, 1858) |
|
|
|
Pseudoneoponera |
Pseudoneoponera rufipes (Jerdon, 1851) |
|
|
|
Pseudomyrmecinae |
Tetraponera |
Tetraponera rufonigra (Jerdon, 1851) |
|
Table 2. List of invasive ant species of tehsil Salooni.
|
Species |
Invasive species |
|
Monomorium pharaonsis (Linnaeus, 1758) |
Introduced |
|
Trichomyrmex destructor (Jerdon, 1851) |
Introduced |
Table 3. Different functional groups including their respective genus.
|
Functional groups |
Genus |
|
Generalised Myrmicinae |
Crematogaster |
|
Messor |
|
|
Monomorium |
|
|
Pheidole |
|
|
Opportunists |
Odontoponera |
|
Myrmica |
|
|
Lepisiota |
|
|
Formica |
|
|
Aphaenogaster |
|
|
Subordinate Camponotini |
Polyrhachis |
|
Camponotus |
|
|
Hot climate specialists |
Monomorium |
|
Cold climate specialists |
Monomorium |
|
Lasius |
|
|
Tropical climate specialists |
Aenictus |
|
Tetraponera |
|
|
Cryptic species |
Lepisiota |
|
Specialist predators |
Anochetus |
|
Leptogenys |
Table 4. List of ant species that has already been reported from higher
regions of Himachal Pradesh.
|
Species name |
Location |
References |
|
Camponotus albosparsus |
Himalayan Region, Nerwa |
Bharti (2008), Rilta &
Sharma (2024) |
|
Camponotus kattensis |
Himalayan region, Nerwa, Shimla
|
Bharti (2008), Rilta &
Sharma (2024), Rilta & Narwal (2025) |
|
Camponotus compressus |
Himalayan region, Andretta,
Bakhra, Kotla |
Bharti (2008), Bharti et al. (2017) |
|
Crematogaster sagei |
Himalayan Region, Nerwa, Shimla |
Bharti (2008), Rilta &
Sharma (2024), Rilta & Narwal (2025) |
|
Monomorium pharaonsis |
Himalayan Region, Chanaur,
Renuka, Guga, Shivalik region, Nerwa |
Bharti (2008), Bharti et al.
(2016b), Bharti et al. (2017), Rilta & Sharma (2024) |
|
Leptogenys lucidula |
Himalayan Region, Shimla |
Bharti (2008), Rilta &
Narwal (2025) |
|
Lasius himalayans |
Himalayan Region, Shimla |
Bharti (2008), Rilta &
Narwal (2025) |
|
Messor himalayanus |
Himalayan region, Andretta,
Bilaspur, Mandi, Nerwa, Shimla |
Bharti (2008), Bharti et al.
(2017), Rilta and Sharma (2024), Rilta & Narwal (2025) |
|
Myrmica smythiesii |
Himalayan region |
Bharti (2008) |
|
Myrmica aimonissabaudiae |
Himalayan region |
Bharti (2008) |
|
Tetraponera rufonigra |
Himalayan region |
Bharti (2008) |
|
Aphaenogaster cavernicola |
Himalayan region |
Bharti (2008) |
|
Aphaenogaster smythiesii |
Himalayan region, Shimla |
Bharti (2008), Rilta &
Narwal (2025) |
|
Pheidole indica |
Himalayan Region, Una, Terrace,
Nerwa, Shimla |
Bharti (2008), Bharti et al.
(2017), Rilta & Sharma (2024), Rilta & Narwal (2025) |
For figures
- - click here for full PDF
References
Agosti, D.,
J.D. Majer, L.E. Alonso & T.R. Schultz (2000). Standard Methods for Measuring
and Monitoring Biodiversity. Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC, 204–206 pp.
Andersen,
A.N. (1995). A
classification of Australian ant communities based on functional groups which
parallel plant life-forms in relation to stress and disturbance. Journal of
Biogeography 22: 15–29.
Andersen,
A.N. (1997). Using ants
as bioindicators: multiscale issues in ant community ecology. Conservation
Ecology 1: 1–17.
Bharti, H.
(2025). Indian ants.
http://www.antweb.org/india.jsp. Accessed online at 14 May 2025.
Bharti, H.
& A.A. Wachkoo (2013). Cerapachys browni and Cerapachys costatus,
two new rare ant species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from India. Biologia
68: 1189–1192.
Bharti, H.,
B. Guénard, M. Bharti & E.P. Economo (2016a). An updated checklist of the ants
of India with their specific distributions in Indian states (Hymenoptera,
Formicidae). ZooKeys 551: 1–83.
Bharti, H.,
M. Bharti & M. Pfeiffer (2016b). Ants as bioindicators of
ecosystem health in Shivalik Mountains of Himalayas: Assessment of species
diversity and invasive species. Asian Myrmecology 8: 1–8.
Bharti, H.,
A.A. Wachkoo & R. Kumar (2017). First Inventory of Ants
(Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in northwestern Shivalik, India. Halteres 8:
33–68.
Bharti, H.
(2008). Altitudinal
Diversity of Ants in Himalayan Regions (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology
52(2): 305–322.
Bingham, C.T.
(1903). The fauna
of British India, including Ceylon and Burma. Hymenoptera, Vol. II. Ants and
Cuckoo-wasps. Taylor and Francis, London, 506 pp.
Bolton, B.
(1994). Identification
Guide to the Ant Genera of the World. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard
University Press, 222 pp.
Bolton, B.
(2025). An online
catalogue of the ants of the world: AntCat. http://www.antcat.org/accessed on
14 May 2025.
Brassard, F.,
C.M. Leong, H.H. Chan & B. Guénard (2021). High diversity in urban areas:
How comprehensive sampling reveals high ant species richness within one of the
most urbanized regions of the world. Diversity 13(8): 358.
Castro,
F.S.D., P.G. da Silva, R. Solar, G.W. Fernandes & F.D.S. Neves (2020). Environmental drivers of
taxonomic and functional diversity of ant communities in a tropical
mountain. Insect Conservation and Diversity 13(4): 393–403.
Donisthorpe,
H. (1938). New species
of ants and a new subgenus of Dolichoderus from various localities. Annals
and Magazine of Natural History 2: 498–504.
Emery, C.
(1895). Viaggio di
Leonardo Fea in Birmania e regioni vicine. LXIII. Formiche di Birmania del
Tenasserim e dei Monti Carin raccolte da L. Fea. Parte II. Annali del Museo
Civico di Storia Naturale 2: 450–483.
Fabricius,
J.C. (1787). Mantissa
insectorum sistens eorum species nuper detectas adiectis characteribus,
genericis, differentiis, specificis, emendationibus, observationibus. Tome I. Hafniae
[= Copenhagen]: C. G. Proft, 348.
Foerster, A.
(1850). Hymenopterologische
Studien. 1. Formicariae. Ernst Ter Meer, Aachen, 74 pp.
Fontanilla,
A.M., A. Nakamura, Z. Xu, M. Cao, R.L. Kitching, Y. Tang & C.J. Burwell
(2019). Taxonomic
and functional ant diversity along tropical, subtropical, and subalpine
elevational transects in Southwest China. Insects 10(5): 128.
Forel, A.
(1902). Myrmicinae
nouveaux de l’Inde et de Ceylan. Revue Suisse de Zoologie 10: 165–249.
Forel, A.
(1904). Miscellanea
myrmécologiques. Revue Suisse de Zoologie 12: 1–52.
Gadagkar, R.,
P. Nair & D.M. Bhat (1993). Ant species richness and diversity in some selected
localities in Western Ghat, India. Hexopoda 5(2): 79–94.
Jerdon, T.C.
(1851). A catalogue
of the species of ants found in Southern India. Madras Journal of Literature
and Science 17: 103–127.
Laakel, N.,
L. Aissat, L. Bounab & C. Yahiaoui (2024). Diversity and species
composition of ants in urban and suburban environments in Bejaia City
(Algeria). Sociobiology 71(2): e9698. https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v71i2.9698
Li, Z.Y.,
Z.H. Xu, X.M. Zhang, T. Li, X.D. Yin & J.H. Duan (2023). Ant species diversity in the
central and northern parts of the western Sichuan Plateau in China. Diversity 15(8):
935. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15080935
Linnaeus, C.
(1758). Systema
naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum
characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Tomus I. Editio decima, reformata.
Holmiae [= Stockholm]: L. Salvii, 824 pp.
Mayr, G.
(1862).
Myrmecologische Studien. Verhandlungen der Kaiserlich-Königlichen
Zoologisch-Botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien 12: 649–776.
Mayr,
G. (1879). Beitrage
zur Ameisen- Fauna Asiens. Verhandlungen der Kaiserlich-Königlichen
Zoologisch-Botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien 28: 645–686.
Menozzi, C.
(1939). Formiche
dell’Himalaya e del Karakorum raccolte dalla Spedizione italiana comandata da
S. A. R. il Duca di Spoleto. Atti della Società Italiana di Scienze Naturali
e del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano 78: 285–345.
Neupane, P.
& I.P. Subedi (2018). Ant diversity in Muhan Pokhari area of Shivapuri-Nagarjun National Park,
Nepal. Journal of Natural History Museum 30: 180–191.
Rilta, J.S.
& N. Narwal (2025). Ant Diversity and Community Composition from North-West Himalayas. Halteres
15(1): 1–12.
Rilta, J.S.
& D. Sharma (2024). Diversity and Abundance of Ants from Tehsil Nerwa of District Shimla,
Himachal Pradesh, India. Uttar Pradesh Journal of Zoology 45(21):
94–105.
Schmidt,
F.A., C.R. Ribas, R.M. Feitosa, F.B. Baccaro, A.C.M. de Queiroz, T.G. Sobrinho
& F. Martello (2022). Ant diversity studies in Brazil: an overview of the myrmecological
research in a megadiverse country. Insectes Sociaux 69(1):
105–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-022-00848-6
Vaid, T.
& S.S. Pathania (2024). Land Use-Land Cover Changes and Associated Drivers: A case of Salooni
Block of Chamba. Current World Environment 19(1): 491. https://doi.org/10.12944/CWE.19.1.40
Ward, P.S.,
S.G. Brady, B.L. Fisher & T.R. Schultz (2015). The evolution of myrmicinae
ants: phylogeny and biogeography of a hyperdiverse ant clade (hymenoptera:
Formicidae). Systematic Entomology 40(1): 61–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12090
Wilson, E.O. (1971). The Insect Societies. The
Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 548 pp.