Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 September 2024 | 16(9): 25894–25903

 

 

ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) 

https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.9088.16.9.25894-25903

#9088 | Received 11 April 2024 | Final received 01 September 2024 | Finally accepted 10 September 2024

 

 

The first report of an assassin bug of the genus Ademula McAtee & Malloch (Reduviidae: Emesinae) from India and its rediscovery from Sri Lanka

 

H. Sankararaman 1, Tharindu Ranasinghe 2, Anubhav Agarwal 3, Amila Sumanapala 4 & Hemant V. Ghate 5

 

1 Department of Crop Protection (Entomology), Vanavarayar Institute of Agriculture, Manakkadavu, Pollachi, Coimbatore,

Tamil Nadu 642103, India.

2 Wild Island Foundation, 6A, Mendis Lane, Moratuwa, 10400, Sri Lanka.

3 12 Z Rutland Gate, 4th Street, Aroshree Kailash, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600006, India.

4 Department of Zoology and Environment Sciences, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka.

5 Post-Graduate Research Centre, Department of Zoology, Modern College of Arts, Science and Commerce (Autonomous),

Shivajinagar, Pune, Maharashtra 411005, India.

1 sankararaman05@gmail.com, 2 tharindu2010ac@gmail.com, 3 anubhavpost@gmail.com, 4 apsumanapala@gmail.com,

5 hemantghate@gmail.com (corresponding author)

 

 

Editor: Hélcio R. Gil-Santana, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.        Date of publication: 26 September 2024 (online & print)

 

Citation: Sankararaman, H., T. Ranasinghe, A. Agarwal, A. Sumanapala & H.V. Ghate (2024). The first report of an assassin bug of the genus Ademula McAtee & Malloch (Reduviidae: Emesinae) from India and its rediscovery from Sri Lanka. Journal of Threatened Taxa 16(9): 25894–25903. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.9088.16.9.25894-25903

  

Copyright: © Sankararaman et al. 2024. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. JoTT allows unrestricted use, reproduction, and distribution of this article in any medium by providing adequate credit to the author(s) and the source of publication.

 

Funding: Self-funded.

 

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

 

Author details: Sankararaman. H is a determined insect collector, interested in the taxonomy and natural history. He works on hover flies (Syrphidae) from India and has described few species new to science. He has documented several groups of insects across India, especially from the biodiversity hotspots. Tharindu Ranasinghe is a researcher at the Wild Island Foundation in Sri Lanka, where he works as a field biologist. His research primarily focuses on Sri Lankan freshwater fishes, insects, and arachnids. He has co-authored around twenty research papers and has described two new fish species. Anubhav Agarwal has been studying insects independently for many years. He also engages in educating about the same to school students, teachers, and stake holders in various habitats. Amila Sumanapala is a postgraduate researcher at University of Colombo studying Odonata taxonomy and biogeography. He has over 15 years of experience exploring the faunal biodiversity of Sri Lanka and research related to ecology and conservation biology. H.V. Ghate is a retired zoologist working on taxonomical problems about bugs and a few other insects.

 

Author contributions: Ranasinghe and Sumanpala recorded natural history and did photography in Sri Lanka. Sankararaman and Agarwal recorded, photogarphed and collected Indian specimens. H.V. Ghate identified, dissected, prepared images and prepared the first draft. All authors contributed to revision of the first draft and preparation of final draft.

 

Acknowledgements: We are indebted to the authorities of Modern College, Pune, for the facilities and encouragement to HVG. TR and AS would like to thank Nuwan Chathuranga and Ruvinda de Mel for assistance in the field. HS and AA are grateful to Saravanaraja for his assistance in the field and also for sharing the images of live individuals of Ademula from Padappai, Tamil Nadu. We also thank Mr. Gaurav for allowing us to explore his farm, from where these bugs were collected. Line drawings from photos were prepared by Miss Shruti Paripatyadar and we are thankful for that. We thank Dr. Mr. Yugandhar Shinde, Mr. Digvijay Jadhav and Ms. Shruti Yeola for their assistance in preparation of slides and photography. We are indebted to Dr. Hélcio Gil-Santana (Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) for reading and improving the first draft of this manuscript. Special thanks are due to Dr. Dávid Rédei (National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan), for constant support for our work on Emesinae and other bugs. Finally, we thank all the reviewers for useful suggestions for the improvement of this manuscript.

 

 

Abstract: Emesine bug Ademula contaminata (Distant, 1903) is recorded from India for the first time and rediscovered from Sri Lanka. Details of its morphology, including the male genitalia, are presented along with images of the habitat. Images of living bugs in natural habitat are presented along with some comments on natural history of these bugs.

 

Keywords: Assassin bug, distribution, emesine bug, Emesini, natural history, Oriental region, thread-legged bugs.

 

 

INTRODUCTION

 

The subfamily Emesinae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Reduviidae), commonly called thread-legged assassin bugs, is one of the most remarkable and species-rich subfamilies of the family Reduviidae, as is evident from the monograph by Wygodzinsky (1966) and the catalogue of Reduviidae of the World by Capriles (1990). There are six tribes, about 90 genera, and 950 species of Emesinae (Wygodzinsky 1966; Schuh & Weirauch 2020) and new species continue to be added.

Ademula McAtee & Malloch, 1926 includes small macropterous species distributed in Australian, Ethiopian, and Oriental regions; key to the species described prior to 1966 was published by Wygodzinsky (1966); Capriles (1990) subsequently listed 13 species and the 14th species was added by Rédei (2005). Very recently, Chen et al. (2023) added two more species from southwestern China, so the total number of species of Ademula is now 16. The list of all Ademula species and their distribution has also been tabulated by Chen et al. (2023). Of the seven species recorded from the Oriental region, only one species, namely Ademula contaminata (Distant, 1903), is recorded from Sri Lanka. The genus Ademula has not been previously recorded from India (Ambrose 2006; Mukherjee et al. 2020). Following the latest classification (discussed later), the genus Ademula is now placed under tribe Emesini (formerly it was under Ploiariolini).

Ademula was erected by McAtee & Malloch (1926) to accommodate two species described simultaneously: A. reticulata as the type species of the genus (type locality: Singapore; a paratype from Sandakan, Borneo) and A. nubecula (type locality: Sandakan, Borneo); however, only comparative comments with reference to a few other genera like Tridemula Horváth, 1914 and Empicoris Wolff, 1811 were given by the original authors. A detailed diagnosis of the genus was subsequently given by Wygodzinsky (1966).

During a biodiversity survey in March 2021, one of the authors (TR) documented and photographed an Emesinae species from a garden in Kandumulla, Sri Lanka. Subsequent surveys revealed a few more individuals of the same bug as well as nymphs in other locations (Image 1a–f). Within a short time from the above discovery, two males of the same species were photographed (26 January 2022) and collected after few days, by two of the authors (HS & AA), in southern India. These were studied in detail to establish the identity of the species. This Emesinae species was identified as Ademula contaminata based on Wygodzinsky (1966) and confirmed using recent keys for the Oriental species (Rédei 2005; Chen et al. 2023)

Distant (1903a) described Ploiariola contaminata from ‘Biserat, Jalor’ based on material collected during 1901–1902 expedition to the ‘Siamese Malay States’; Wygodzinsky (1966) studied a specimen from Peradeniya, Ceylon (= Sri Lanka), preserved at NHM, London, and placed it in a new combination as Ademula contaminata and gave the distribution of this species as ‘Malaya; Ceylon’. The original description and illustrations given by Distant (1903a) were also consulted and those helped further to confirm the identity of the species. The image of the type available in the database of the Natural History Museum, London (NHM) was also found to be useful; the colouration of forewing of the type is almost identical to what is seen in our material.

Ademula contaminata is described here in greater details, based on two male specimens collected from Padappai, Kanchipuram, Tamil Nadu, India, with several digital photos. Photos of live specimens from India as well as Sri Lanka, with some comments on the natural history, are also provided. Sri Lankan specimens were not collected but bugs were watched for behaviour and photographed.

Although the species has previously been recorded from Sri Lanka, there have been no subsequent reports from the country for more than 120 years – a fact probably related to lack of surveys and lack of taxonomic expertise in this group. This report is therefore the first record of this genus from India and an interesting rediscovery of the species from Sri Lanka.

 

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 

In Sri Lanka the various potential habitats for the bugs were explored using a visual encounter survey method. Observations of Emesinae bugs were documented with photographs, primarily using Canon EOS 7D or Canon EOS 7D Mark ii camera, fitted with a Canon EF 100 mm f/2.8 L IS USM macro lens.

In India, small patches of grass and shrub vegetation were being surveyed when these bugs were found. The bugs were collected and preserved in 70% alcohol and subsequently studied and photographed under a Leica Stereozoom MZ6 with attached Canon PowerShot S50. The methods of preparation of genitalia follow those outlined by Ghate et al. (2021).

 

 

Results

 

Material examined: Two males collected from Padappai (12.88 °N, 80.01 °E), Kanchipuram, Tamil Nadu, India). Date 12.ii.2022; leg. HS and AA. Preserved in Modern College, Pune.

 

Taxonomic position

Family Reduviidae Latreille, 1807

Subfamily Emesinae Amyot & Serville, 1843

Tribe Emesini Amyot & Serville, 1843 [sensu Standring et al. 2023]

Genus Ademula McAtee & Malloch, 1926 (1926: 125); Wygodzinsky & Usinger (1960: 262 new species); Wygodzinsky (1966: 337, diagnosis, key to the species and distribution); Villiers (1970: 818, distribution of the genus, new species 1982: 27 new species); Capriles (1990: 141, catalogued); Ishikawa & Yasunaga (2004: 1, diagnosis, distribution, redescription); Rédei (2005: 128, distribution, new species); Chen et al. (2023: 702, diagnosis, distribution, new species, DNA Barcodes, key to Oriental species)

Ademula contaminata (Distant, 1903):

Ploiariola contaminata Distant, 1903 (1903a: 258, original description, habitus drawing)

Ademula contaminata (Distant): Wygodzinsky (1966: 339, new comb., in key, distribution); Capriles (1990: 142, catalogued); Rédei (2005: 131, in key); Chen et al. (2023: 710, in key)

Genus Ademula: diagnostic characters

Diagnostic characters of the genus Ademula, as given recently by Chen et al. (2023), are stated verbatim here: “Members of Ademula are small-sized and usually pale-coloured species with variable colour patterns on legs and forewings, and can be recognised within the tribe by the following combination of characters: the posterior pronotal lobe has a well-developed lateral carina; the scutellum and the abdominal tergite I each bears a spine-like process; the metanotum is rounded apically or has a small process; the fore tarsus is three-segmented; the fore wing has a single discal cell, and a single vein (M + Cu) is extending basally from the cell”. Similarities and differences of Ademula with related genera are discussed later.

 

Redescription of Ademula contaminata

Colouration and vestiture: Colour (after preservation). General colour ochraceous with pale or dark brown areas on head, thorax, fore legs, and fore wings. Head uniformly brown, eyes dark brown to black; antennae: first antennomere pale, with subapical dark annulation; remaining antennomeres darker; labium: first visible segment (actual second) very pale, remaining segments dark. Pronotum: disc of anterior lobe dark brown, posterior lobe with median and lateral longitudinal pale brown bands (Image 2a–c); area around scutellum dark brown. Fore legs: coxa pale brown, distal one third darker; femora with three incomplete annulations of dark brown which appear darker on external (posterior) face than on internal (anterior) face; femoral basal dark annulation occupies almost half length of femur, second large one near middle, third and smallest subapical; fore tibiae also possess three annulations of brown that are basal, near middle and apical in position; tarsal segments dark brown to blackish (Image 2e). Mid and hind femora with four dark spots or incomplete annulations, two before middle and two after middle; mid and hind tibiae show one dark, sub-basal dark annulation; mid and hind tarsi dark brown (Image 2f). Abdomen pale brown, segments V and VI with orange tinge. Pygophore brownish.

Body surface mostly dull, some parts of head and pronotum sub shining; all body except wings covered with short and long pubescence or setae, as shown in Images 2 and 3. Mid and hind legs with sparse macrochaetae.

 

Structure

Head short, broader than long due to very large eyes; ante-ocular slightly longer than postocular portion in lateral view, slightly convex dorsally; ante-ocular with sides parallel in dorsal view; postocular narrowed posteriorly, semiglobular in dorsal and lateral aspects. Eyes very large, occupying almost 50% area of head, as seen laterally, and appearing nearly sub-hemispherical in dorsal view (Image 2d). Labium 4 segmented but first segment not visible hence visible segments are actually second, third and fourth; labium curved, strongly bent between second and third segments; second segment longest and stout, third short and swollen in middle, fourth very slender and longer than third (Image 2b,c). Antenniferous tubercles large, inserted in front of eyes, towards anterior border of head; first antennomere (scape) with long setae. Transverse interocular sulcus curved, situated between eyes, almost at level of middle of eye in dorsal view.

Pronotum short, saddle like, constricted before middle; anterior lobe nearly as wide as long, its sides slightly rounded, disk with roundish or oval depression medially in posterior part; posterior lobe with its sides diverging posteriorly, its surface finely punctate, with short, lateral carina on anterior portion (Image 3a,b). Scutellum and first abdominal tergite with a distinct spine (Image 2b,f). Forewing smooth, passing apex of abdomen; one large discal cell present, pterostigma reaching apex of wing; venation, and pattern of dark patches as shown in Image 4.

Fore leg slender, its femur with usual two series of spiniferous processes. Posteroventral series, beginning close to base of article, including three relatively thick, long, prominent spiniferous processes and numerous short processes in between, long processes about one third shorter than diameter of femur; first long spiniferous processes close to base appears slightly longer than remaining two, second one situated close by, third farther, beyond middle of femur. Anteroventral series continuous, uninterrupted, starting slightly distal to first long spine of posteroventral series, without long processes. Fore tibia long, thinner than femur, about four-fifths as long as femur, ventrally with series of strong decurved spine-like setae. Fore tarsus three segmented (see inset Image 3c). Claws of equal size. Mid and hind legs very slender, thread-like; hind femora distinctly surpassing apex of abdomen.

Abdomen elongate, narrow at base in lateral and ventral views, wide distally. Seventh tergite short in male, not projecting over pygophore; eighth sternite visible. Pygophore elongate, small, broader at base and narrowed apically, longer than high in lateral view, pygophoral process (superoposterior spine, SP) blunt spine-like as seen in ventral view (Image 5a,b). Parameres (P) short, slender, slightly curved at base, dilated beyond middle, with sparse, simple setae and sharp point at one side in apical region (Image 5e). Phallus slightly sclerotized, dorsally with saddle-shaped sclerotization on phallotheca; vesica arms long and slender, with swollen base and apical thread-like part; articulatory apparatus well developed and sclerotised (Image 5c,d).

 

Notes on the habitat in India

The specimens were collected from a teak Tectona grandis plantation in an undisturbed suburban wild patch, with mixed vegetation of perennial trees and grassland. The bugs were resting on the under surface of teak leaves, in the low-lying branches of the trees, a couple of feet above the ground level. The collected bugs were docile as they were collected during day time. The pale colouration of the bugs made it difficult to spot them when they were resting on the dry leaves. Furthermore, the bugs remained almost flat, keeping their legs and entire body very close to the leaf surface when approached, merging totally with the environment. Some images of live specimen, before those were collected, are available on the following links of iNaturalist (courtesy: Saravanaraja and Anubhav Agarwal), (https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/105676730), (https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/105671338). Habitat pictures are shown in Image 6a,b.

 

Natural history observed in Sri Lankan population

Both adults and nymphs appear to be arboreal and were observed in well wooded home gardens or forested areas. These bugs are nocturnal and the individuals observed in day time were found resting in abandoned spider webs under the leaves, about 1.5–2.0 m above the ground. If disturbed these bugs walk away from their resting place rather than flying.  When resting, both adults and nymphs, usually keep their forelegs retracted and close to the head (Image 1a–f). These emesine bugs seemed to prefer well shaded undergrowth as their habitat. We observed both adults and nymphs in the same location, close to each other, but never on the same leaf.

Individuals observed at night seemed to be active and foraging for prey and unlike in the daytime, these usually flew away if disturbed and landed on another leaf close by. One of the individuals recorded at night was observed preying on a limoniid crane fly (most probably Styringomyia sp.; Image 1d) which was slightly larger than the bug.

 

 

DISCUSSION

 

According to the keys given recently by Rédei (2005) and Chen et al. (2023), the diagnostic characters of A. contaminata are: ‘mid- and hind-femora with a subapical annulus and three more annuli along its length; fore femur 10 times longer than its breadth and forewing with numerous large and small dark spots’. All these characters are present in the specimens shown here. The species is distributed widely in Sri Lanka (Image 7) but is known from a single locality in India so far.

There is not much information concerning biology of any species of Ademula described so far, except for the fact that A. aemula Rédei, 2005 was collected from dry, mixed subtropical forest when attracted to light (Rédei 2005) and two recently described species were found resting on underside of leaves and were collected by sweeping with net (Chen et al. 2023). In the present study, the specimens were collected from a similar habitat (Image 6a,b) in India, but during the day. A mummified spider Myrmaplata plataleoides (Salticidae) was found in close proximity to Ademula, although the bug was not found actually feeding on that spider. The habitats in which Emesinae are found are varied and this fact, along with comments on general bionomics and geographical distribution, has been discussed in detail by Wygodzinsky (1966).

Wygodzinsky (1966) had recognized six tribes under Emesinae: Collartidini Wygodzinsky, 1966; Leistarchini Stål, 1862; Deliastini Villiers, 1949; Metapterini Stål, 1874, Emesini Amyot & Serville, 1843, and Ploiariolini Van Duzee, 1916. Very recently the classification of Emesinae was revised, based on morphological as well as molecular analyses; this new classification has treated the former subfamilies Saicinae Stål, 1859 and Visayanocorinae Miller, 1952 as tribes under Emesinae. This so called “Emesine Complex” now is said to include over 1,000 species and the currently recognized six tribes under Emesinae are: Collartidini Wygodzinsky, Leistarchini Stål, Visayanocorini Miller, Emesini Amyot & Serville, Oncerotrachelini Standring et al., 2023 and Saicini Stål. Former tribes such as Metapterini and Ploiariolini are now treated as synonyms under Emesini; the tribe Deliastini was already treated as a junior synonym of Metapterini (Castro-Huertas et al. 2020; Standring et al. 2023).

Even though Emesinae in India have received considerable attention in the past few years, with new species descriptions as well as redescriptions of a few species, as referred before in Joshi et al. (2022), Sri Lankan Emesinae need detailed redescriptions; only one new species (Ghate et al. 2018) has been added since the work by Villiers (1970).

Earlier we reported and redescribed Myiophanes greeni Distant, 1903, and Onychomesa susainathani Wygodzinsky, 1966 [now treated as synonym of O. alata (Distant, 1903) which was originally described as Ischnocytes alatus  (Distant 1903b): see Chen et al. 2024], both originally described from Sri Lanka; similarly, we also recently reported from India Gardena melinarthrum Dohrn, 1860, Lutevula hortensia (Distant, 1906), Bagauda aelleni Villiers, 1970 and Hornylia nalanda Wygodzinsky, 1966 – all species originally described from Sri Lanka (Kulkarni & Ghate 2016; Ghate & Sarode 2019; Hiremath et al. 2022; Ismavel & Ghate 2024; Ranasinghe et al. 2024; Boyane et al. 2024). Some of these species were also rediscovered from Sri Lanka after a considerable gap (Ranasinghe & Ghate 2022; Ranasinghe et al. 2024). Ademula contaminata becomes yet another Sri Lankan emesine recorded in southern India. Extensive surveys in India and Sri Lanka will surely recover more Emesinae, known or new, from both these countries.

 

For images - - click here for full PDF

 

 

REFERENCES

 

Ambrose, D.P. (2006). A checklist of Indian assassin bugs (Insects: Heteroptera: Reduviidae) with taxonomic status, distribution and diagnostic morphological characteristics. Zoos’ Print Journal 21(9): 2388–2406. [With a separate supplement that gives checklist of species, etc.]. https://doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.ZPJ.871.2388-406

Boyane, S.S., A.P. Ranjith & H.V. Ghate (2024). First record of Hornylia nalanda from India (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Reduviidae: Emesinae). Zootaxa 5506(1): 104–112. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5506.1.6

Castro-Huertas, V., D. Forero & J. Grazia (2020). Evolution of wing polymorphism and genital asymmetry in the thread-legged bugs of the tribe Metapterini Stål (Hemiptera, Reduviidae, Emesinae) based on morphological characters. Systematic Entomology 46(1): 28–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12445

Chen, Z., H. Li & W. Cai (2023). Two new species of Ademula McAtee & Malloch (Hemiptera: Reduviidae: Emesinae) from China with an updated key to the Oriental species. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 71: 702–712. https://doi.org/10.26107/RBZ-2023-0052

Chen, Z., M.D. Webb & W. Cai (2024). Taxonomic notes on the genus Onychomesa Wygodzinsky (Hemiptera: Reduviidae: Emesinae). International Journal of Tropical Insect Science 44: 555–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42690-023-01149-6

Distant, W.L. (1903a). Report on the Rhynchota - Part I, Heteroptera. Fasciculi Malayaenses, Zoology Part II: 219–272 University of Liverpool, Longmans, Green & Company, England.

Distant, W.L. (1903b). The fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma. Rhynchota. Vol. II. (Heteroptera) Part I. Taylor and Francis, London, 242 pp.

Ghate, H.V., S. Kulkarni & S.P. Benjamin (2018). Giant assassin in the cave: a new species of the genus Myiophanes from Sri Lanka (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Reduviidae: Emesinae. Zootaxa 4524(2): 237–244. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4524.2.7

Ghate, H.V., S.S. Boyane & M.D. Webb (2021). Description of the adult of the thread-legged assassin bug Eugubinus araneus (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) from India, with comments on other congeneric species. Zootaxa 4990(2): 291–304. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4990.2.5

Hiremath, S.R., S. Saikia & H.V. Ghate (2022). Authentic report of the emesine bug Gardena melinarthrum Dohrn, 1860 (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Reduviidae) from India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 14(6): 21296–21301. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.7902.14.6.21296-21301

Ishikawa, T. & T. Yasunaga (2004). New records of two assassin bug genera (Heteroptera, Reduviidae, Emesinae) from Japan with description of a new species. Japanese Journal of Systematic Entomology 10(1): 1–6.

Ismavel, V.A. & H.V. Ghate (2024). First report of Lutevula hortensia (Distant) (Heteroptera: Reduviidae: Emesinae) from India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 16(5): 25220–25226. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.8931.16.5.25220-25226

Joshi, N.U., S.S. Boyane & H.V. Ghate (2022). Redescription of Bagauda avidus (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Reduviidae: Emesinae) with notes on other species of the genus in India. Zootaxa 518(4): 361–372. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5188.4.4

Kulkarni, S. & H. Ghate (2016). First record of the thread-legged assassin bug Myiophanes greeni Distant, 1903 (Heteroptera: Reduviidae: Emesinae) from India. Biodiversity Data Journal 4: e7949. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e7949

McAtee, W.L. & J.R. Malloch (1926). Philippine and Malayan Ploiariinae (Hemiptera, Reduviidae). Philippine Journal of Science 30 [1925]: 117–152.

Capriles, J.M. (1990). Systematic Catalogue of the Reduviidae of the World (Insecta: Heteroptera). A special edition of Caribbean Journal of Science, Mayagüez, x + 694 pp.

Mukherjee, P., K. Chandra & M.E. Hassan (2020). Catalogue of Reduviidae (Hemiptera) of India. Records of the Zoological Survey of India, Occasional Paper no. 401, 240 pp.

Ranasinghe, T. & H.V. Ghate (2022). On the rediscovery of Gardena melinarthrum Dohrn from Sri Lanka. Journal of Threatened Taxa 14(6): 21318–21320. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.8052.14.6.21318-21320

Ranasinghe, T., H. Sankararaman, A. Agarwal, A. Sumanapala & H. Ghate (2024). First record of Bagauda aelleni (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) from India and notes on its natural history in Sri Lanka. Zootaxa 5493(2): 153–164. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5493.2.4

Rédei, D. (2005). Additional notes on the thread-legged assassin bug fauna of Taiwan, with description of a new species (Heteroptera: Reduviidae: Emesinae). Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology 8(2): 127–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1226-8615(08)60082-5

Schuh, R.T. & C. Weirauch (2020). True Bugs of the World (Hemiptera: Heteroptera). Classification and Natural History. II Edition. Siri Scientific Press, Monograph Series, Vol. 8, 767 pp, with 32 color plates

Standring, S., D. Forero & C. Weirauch (2023). Untangling the assassin’s web: Phylogeny and classification of the spider-associated Emesine complex (Hemiptera: Reduviidae). Systematic Entomology 2023: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12603

Villiers, A. (1970). Nouveaux hemipteres Reduviidae de Madagaskar et de Comores. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France (N.S.) 6(4): 809–824.

Villiers, A. (1982). Hémiptères Reduviidae africains. Localisations et descriptions. II. Emesinae. Revue française d’Entomologie (N.S.) 4(1): 27–39.

Wygodzinsky, P. & R.L. Usinger (1960). Insects of Micronesia Heteroptera: Reduviidae. Insects of Micronesia 7(5): 231–283.

Wygodzinsky, P.W. (1966). A monograph of the Emesinae (Reduviidae, Hemiptera). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 133: 1–614.