Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 June 2024 | 16(6): 25461–25464

 

ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) 

https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.8988.16.6.25461-25464

#8988 | Received 25 February 2024 | Final received 19 May 2024 | Finally accepted 12 June 2024

 

 

First record of Croaking Gourami Trichopsis vittata (Cuvier, 1831) from West Bengal, India

 

Sujal Dutta 1 , Bakul Biswas 2  & Bibhas Guha 3

 

1–3 Department of Zoology, Netaji Subhas Open University, DD-26, Sector-I, Salt Lake City, Kolkata, West Bengal 700064, India.

1 sujalsnehadutta@gmail.com, 2 bakul87in@gmail.com, 3 g.bibhas@gmail.com (corresponding author)

 

 

Editor: J.A. Johnson, Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, India.                    Date of publication: 26 June 2024 (online & print)

 

Citation: Dutta, S., B. Biswas & B. Guha (2024). First record of Croaking Gourami Trichopsis vittata (Cuvier, 1831) from West Bengal, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 16(6): 25461–25464. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.8988.16.6.25461-25464

  

Copyright: © Dutta et al. 2024. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.  JoTT allows unrestricted use, reproduction, and distribution of this article in any medium by providing adequate credit to the author(s) and the source of publication.

 

Funding: Self-funded.

 

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

 

Acknowledgements: The authors are thankful to the Department of Zoology, Netaji Subhas Open University for providing requisite research facilities. The authors are also thankful to Fresh water fish section, Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata for proper species identification and documentation.

 

 

Abstract: The Croaking Gourami Trichopsis vittata (Cuvier, 1831) is a native fish to southeastern Asia and Sundaland, with introduction reports from the USA, Philippines, and many other countries including India. In India, this species was first reported from Chembarampakkam Lake situated in Chennai during the year 2015. This study reports the presence of this fish for the first time in the Magra Beel, a wetland in the district of Nadia, West Bengal, in 2021, 2022, 2023. The laboratory evaluated the fish samples taken from the marsh to determine their fin ray counts and morphometric data. The results identified the species as T. vittata and supported previous research.

 

Keywords: Aquarium trade, distribution, invasion, Magra Beel, meristic count, morphometry, osphronemid fish, species identification.

 

 

 

Trichopsis vittata (Cuvier, 1831), known as Croaking Gourami in the ornamental fish trade, is a small air-breathing osphronemid fish, reported as native from Java, Borneo, Sumatra, Peninsular Malaysia, Thailand, and the Mekong basin in Cambodia, Laos, and Viet-nam (Kottelat 1985; Baird et al. 1999). The species is an obligate air-breathing fish that prefers to live in shallow sluggish or standing-water habitats with abundant vegetation (Rainboth 1996). It can survive in brackish water up to 20 ppt salinity, and in temperatures down to 7.20C (Schofield & Schulte 2016). It feeds on small planktonic crustaceans and insect larvae (Rainboth 1996). This species comprises more-extended filamentous anal-fin rays extending almost to the tip of the caudal-fin and also possesses three dark lateral stripes on the body. A typical dark spot is present above the pectoral fin of the fish as a unique identifying character. Unlike other osphronemid fishes, T. vittata is popularized for the production of audible sounds or “croaks” (Ladich & Yan 1998).

Trichopsis vittata has shown invasiveness and introduced itself to a larger extent. Since its description by Cuvier in 1831 it has extended its range. The feral population has been documented in the USA (Florida) and the Philippines (Shafland 1996; Schofield & Pecora 2013; Schofield & Schulte 2016). The southeastern Asian countries including Indonesia, Thailand, Java, Borneo, Sumatra (Rainboth 1996; Kottelat 1985; Liengpornpan et al. 2007; Beamish et al. 2010), Vietnum (Freyhof et al. 2000; Herder & Freyhof 2006), Mekong tributaries of Indochina (Robins 1992; Baird et al. 1999; Kottelat 2013), Laos (Martin et al. 2011), Singapore (Alfred 1996; Low & Lim 2012), Cambodia (Rainboth  1996), Malaysia (Beamish et al. 2003) are reported to be the native places of T. vittata.

The non-native population of T. vittata has been documented from Myanmar and Bangladesh (Noren et al. 2017; Akash et al. 2018; Hossain et al. 2019). Literature depicts that in India T. vittata was first reported from the Chembarampakkam Lake situated in southern (Knight & Balasubramanian 2015); but its existence has not yet been reported from West Bengal.

 

Study Area and Methods

The fish samples were first collected on 1 August 2021 from the Magra Beel. The collection was done by using a hand held drag net as per the conventional method. Then in quest of other populations of fish, multiple field visits were done between August 2021 and July 2023 in different fishing points of the Magra Beel within a distance of 1.5 km (Point-1: Opposite to Bijra Primary School; Point-2: Concrete bridge at 3 number Magra Beel; Point-3: Kheya Ghat opposite to Birahi Union Tapashili Fishermen’s Cooperative Society Limited office). The sampling sites of the Magra Beel are presented in Image 1.

After collection, the fish specimens were immediately preserved in 10% formalin for taxonomic study (Joshi et al. 2015). Different morphometric characteristics including total length, standard length, pectoral fin base length, pelvic fin base length, and anal fin base length were measured as per the conventional method and different meristic counts for dorsal fin rays, anal fin rays, pectoral fin rays, pelvic fin rays were observed accordingly (Murdy & Shibkawa 2001). The preserved fish samples were submitted to the Fresh Water Fish Section of the Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata for identification and documentation. Some fish samples were subsequently transferred into 30%, 50%, and 70% ethanol for long-term preservation (Sterba 1962; Talwar & Jhingran 1991) for further study.

 

Results

Morphometric and meristic characters

The collected samples have laterally elongated bodies with a standard length of 4.10 cm (Table 1). The dorsal fin originates far behind the base of the pectoral fin corroborating the previous findings of Hossain et al. (2019) and Shefat et al. (2020). A thin black line is found below the eye (Noren et al. 2017). Stripes and black spots are visible on the fin of both sides of the body. The morphometric measurements including total length, standard length, pectoral fin base length, pelvic fin base length, and anal fin base length of the fish have been presented in Table 1. The anal fin is comprised of multi-branched fin rays with 6–8 spines and a few elongated filaments-like rays which are extended almost to the tip of the caudal fin. The dorsal fin of T. vittata has 2–4 spines, while the pelvic fin contains one spine followed by a filament and four rays. On the posterior half of the body, there are three longitudinal dark bands, which help to distinguish T. vittata from the related species T. schalleri and T. pumila (Noren et al. 2017). The fin ray counts are detailed in Table 1 and are consistent with the findings reported by Hossain et al. (2019).

 

Identification and cataloguing

After collecting the samples of fish from three different spots, the specimens were submitted to the Zoological Survey of India (ZSI) for identification and cataloguing. The ZSI has identified the species and registered the submitted specimens as Trichopsis vittata (Cuvier, 1831) [Regd. No. ZSI FF 9935 dt. 24. 08. 2023].

 

Discussion

In this present study, T. vittata was found in a lower abundance than the other native fish species; but the overall count is sufficient to prove its strong adaptability to this new environment. T. vittata is an efficient invader that can survive in a small volume of water and can tolerate high pollution and low dissolved oxygen level conditions (Wongsiri, 1982). Knight & Balasubramanium (2015) reported that in India T. vittata may compete for niche space with native species such as Trichogaster lalius (Hamilton, 1822) and Spiketail Paradise Fish Pseudosphromenus cupnus (Cuvier, 1831). The negative effects of T. vittata may also include aggressive displacement of native species or it may also act as a vector for parasites or pathogens such as trematode, Euclinostomum heterostomum (Purivirojkul & Sumontha 2013). Thus, the spreading of T. vittata across the country over the years will affect the native fish biodiversity. Of late, the particular impact of this species on other indigenous fish species is currently unknown, therefore, further in-depth study regarding its biology, ecology, and inter-specific interactions among the non-native range in India are required at the earnest level.

The way of introduction of the fish species in the Magra Beel is not known. However, the most probable mechanism of introduction may be the release from the aquarium trade (Noren et al. 2017). As per the first recommendations of ZSI, Kolkata, “is an exotic species and distributed worldwide via aquarium trade. The specimen shows some variations from the description of Trichopsis vittata and may be a hybrid also. It needs further study based on freshly collected specimens for confirmation”. Later on ZSI Kolkata identified and registered the specimen as Trichopsis vittata (Cuvier, 1831), family Osphronemidae [Regd No. ZSI FF 9935 dt. 24. 08. 2023]. Deliberate aquaculture efforts could serve as a vector for invasion (Akash & Hossain 2018). Given that T. vittata has been previously reported in various rivers across Bangladesh (Noren et al. 2017), some of which are in close proximity to the state of West Bengal, it is plausible that this species could migrate to West Bengal via these river routes.

 

Table 1. The morphometric measurement and meristic count of fin rays in Trichopsis vittata.

Morphometric characters

Length (cm)

Meristic characters

Number (range)

Total length

5.70

Dorsal fin ray

7–8

Standard length

4.10

Pectoral fin ray

10–11

Pectoral fin base length

1.20

Ventral fin ray

7–9

Pelvic fin base length

2.30

Anal fin ray

31–33

Anal fish base length

1.60

Caudal fin ray

12–16

-

-

Lateral line scales

29

 

 

For images - - click here for full PDF

 

References

 

Akash, M. & M.A. Hossain (2018). A Southeast Asian species in the Ganges delta: on spreading extent of non-native croaking gourami Trichopsis vittata (Cuvier, 1831) in Bangladesh. Bio-invasion Record 7: 447–450. https://doi.org/10.3391/bir.2018.7.4.16

Alfred, E.R. (1966). The fresh-water fishes of Singapore. Zoologische Verhandelingen 78: 3– 68.

Baird, I.G., V. Inthaphaisy, P. Kisouvannalath, B. Phylavanh & B. Mounsouphom (1999). The Fishes of Southern Lao. Lao Community Fisheries and Dolphin Protection Project. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Lao PDR, 161 pp.

Beamish, F.W.H., R.B. Beamish & S.L.H. Lim (2003). Fish Assemblages and Habitat in a Malaysian Blackwater Peat Swamp. Environmental Biology of Fishes 68: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026004315978

Beamish, F.W.H., P. Plongsesthee, P. Chanintarapoomi & P. Nithirojpakdee (2010). Total length-weight relationships among Thai freshwater fishes and the influence of capture location and preservation. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 27(3): 955–958. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2010.01620.x

Cuvier, G. & A. Valenciennes  (1831). Histoire naturelle des poissons. Tome 7. Paris, F.G. Levrault, 531 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.12283

Freyhof,  J., D.V. Serov & T.N. Nguyen (2000). A preliminary checklist of the freshwater fishes of the River Dong Nai, South Vietnam. Bonner Zoologische Beiträge 49: 93–99.

Hamilton, F. (1822). An account of the fishes found in the river Ganges and its branches. Edinburgh & London. pp. 1–39. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.6897

Herder, F. & J. Freyhof (2006). Resource partitioning in a tropical stream fish assemblage. Journal of Fish Biology 69(2): 571–589. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2006.01126.x

Hossain, M.D., S. Shoaibe, L. Gulshan & M.D. Obaida (2019). First record of invasive croaking gourami, Trichopsis vittata (Cuvier, 1831) in South-eastern Bangladesh. Journal of Fisheries and Life Sciences 4(2): 6–9.

Joshi, K.K., M.S. Varsha, V.L. Sruthy, V. Susan & P.V. Prathyusha (2015). Basics of sample collection, preservation and species identification of finfish. Summer school on Recent Advances in Marine Biodiversity Conservation and Management, CMFRI.

Knight, J.M. & S. Balasubramanian (2015). On a record of two alien fish species (Teleostei: Osphronemidae) from the natural waters of Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 7(3): 7044–7046. https://doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.o4135.7044-6

Kottelat, M. (1985). Fresh-water fishes of Kampuchea. Hydrobiologia 121: 249–279.

Kottelat, M. (2013). The fishes of the inland waters of Southeast Asia: a catalogue and core bibliography of the fishes known to occur in freshwaters, mangroves and estuaries. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 27: 1–663

Ladich, F. & H.Y. Yan (1998). Correlation between auditory sensitivity and vocalization in anabantoid fishes. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 182: 737–746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003590050218

Liengpornpan, S., M. Jaroensutasinee & K. Jaroensutasinee (2007). Biology of croaking gourami, Trichopsisvittata: the fish that croaks. Thaksin University Journal 10: 72–83.

Low, B.W. & K.K.P. Lim (2012). Gouramies of the genus Trichopodus in Singapore (Actinopterygii: Perciformes: Osphrenemidae). Nature in Singapore 5: 83–93.

Martin, S.M., K. Lorenzen, R.I. Arthur, P. Kaisone & K. Souvannalangsy (2011). Impacts of fishing by dewatering on fish assemblages of tropical floodplain wetlands: a matter of frequency and context. Biological Conservation 144(1): 633–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.11.005

Murdy, E.O. & K. Shibukawa (2001). A revision of the gobiid fish genus Odontamblyopus (Gobiidae: Amblyopinae). Ichthyological Research 48: 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10228-001-8114-9

Norén,  M., S. Kullander,  M.D. Rahman & A. Mollah (2017). First records of Croaking Gourami, Trichopsis vittata (Cuvier, 1831) (Teleostei: Osphronemidae), from Myanmar and Bangladesh. Check List 13: 81–85. https://doi.org/10.15560/13.4.81

Purivirojkul, W. & M. Sumontha (2013). Eucliinostomum heterostomum (Rudolphi, 1809) metacercarial infection in three osphronemid fish species. Walailak Journal of Sciences and Technology 10(1): 97–102. https://doi.org/10.2004/wjst.v10i1.423

Rainboth, W.J. (1996). FAO species identification field guide for fishery purposes. Fishes of the Cambodian Mekong. Food & Agriculture Org., Fisheries, 265 pp. https://www.fao.org/tempref/docrep/fao/010/v8731e/v8731e.zip

Robins, C.R. (1992). Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. American Fisheries Society (USA) Special Publication#20, 243 pp. https://doi.org/10.47886/9781934874318

Schofield, P.J. & D.J. Pecora (2013). Croaking gourami, Trichopsis vittata (Cuvier, 1831), in Florida, USA. Bio-Invasions Records 2: 247–251.

Schofield, P.J. & J.M. Schulte (2016). Small but tough: What can ecophysiology of croaking gourami Trichopsis vittata (Cuvier, 1831) tell us about invasiveness of non-native fishes in Florida? NeoBiota 28: 51. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.28.5259

Shafland, P.L. (1996). Exotic fishes of Florida - 1994. Reviews in Fisheries Science 4: 101–122.

Shoaibe, S. & M.D. Hossain (2020). Distribution and Taxonomic Study of a Newly Recorded Croaking Gourami, Trichopsis vittata (Cuvier, 1831) in Bangladesh. Acta Scientific Agriculture 4(1): 107–111. http://doi.org/10.31080/ASAG.2020.04.754

Sterba, G. (1962). Freshwater Fishes of The World. Vista Books, London, 878 pp. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605300002532

Talwar, P.K. & A.G. Jhingran (1991). Inland Fishes of India and Adjacent Countries. Oxford-IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 1158 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00043269

Wongsiri, S. (1982). Preliminary survey of the natural enemies of mosquitoes in Thailand. Journal of the Science Society of Thailand 8: 205–213. https://doi.org/10.2306/scienceasia1513-1874.1982.08.205