Journal of
Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 October 2024 | 16(10):
26013–26021
ISSN
0974-7907 (Online) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Print)
https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.8911.16.10.26013-26021
#8911 | Received 11 January 2024 | Final received 24 September 2024 |
Finally accepted 14 October 2024
Evaluating the IUCN conservation status of Tritaxis kurnoolensis
(R.R.V.Raju & Pull.) R.Y.Yu. & Welzen (Euphorbiaceae), an endemic tree species found in the
Eastern Ghats region of Andhra Pradesh, India
Sarojinidevi Naidu 1 &
Raja Kullayiswamy Kusom
2
1,2 Plot No. 95/1, Dharmavana Centre of Excellence for Biodiversity and
Climate Resilience, Phase II, IDA, Cherlapalli,
Hyderabad, Telangana 500051, India
1 sarojini@DharmavanaNatureArk.org,
2 rajakswamy@DharmavanaNatureArk.org (corresponding author)
Editor: Aparna Watve,
Biome Conservation Foundation, Pune, India. Date
of publication: 26 October 2024 (online & print)
Citation: Naidu, S. & R.K. Kusom
(2024). Evaluating the IUCN conservation status of Tritaxis kurnoolensis (R.R.V.Raju & Pull.) R.Y.Yu. & Welzen (Euphorbiaceae), an endemic tree species found in the
Eastern Ghats region of Andhra Pradesh, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 16(10):
26013–26021. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.8911.16.10.26013-26021
Copyright: © Naidu & Kusom
2024. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
JoTT allows unrestricted use, reproduction, and
distribution of this article in any medium by providing adequate credit to the
author(s) and the source of publication.
Funding: Dharmavana Nature Ark Association, Hyderabad.
Author details: Dr. Raja Kullayiswamy FIAT, a Scientist at Dharmavana Nature Ark, Hyderabad, completed his PhD in botany from Sri Krishnadevaraya University in 2014. He has worked as a research associate at IISc, Bangalore, and is currently involved in biodiversity conservation with a non-profit society in Hyderabad. Dr. Raja, an invited reviewer for international journals, has published 20 research papers, described nine new taxa, and authored a book on the Tummalapalli Uranium Mining Area, Andhra Pradesh. Dr. Sarojini Devi is a research scientist at Dharmavana Nature Ark. She completed her PhD in 2015 from the Department of Botany, Sri Krishnadevaraya University, Anantapuram. After moving to Bangalore, she worked as a lecturer at MES Degree College, Malleswaram, and KLE Societies S. Nijalingappa College, Rajaji Nagar, Bangalore. Dr. Sarojini has published 19 research articles, described ten new taxa, and is an invited reviewer for international journals.
Author contributions: SD—writing draft,
data analysis, photo settings. RKS—field data collection, data analysis, draft
preparation.
Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Acknowledgements: The authors express
their gratitude to the Dharmavana Nature Ark (DNA),
Hyderabad, for their encouragement, provision of lab facilities, and the
invaluable support of the DNA jungle team. This dedicated team has visited the
type locality multiple times, diligently collecting critical information on the
species. Authors also thank Dr. Aparna Watve, Coordinator, RLA, IUCN SSC Western Ghats Plant
Specialist Group for her critical comments and valuable suggestions to enhance
the quality of the manuscript.
Abstract: Tritaxis kurnoolensis,
a small tree of the Euphorbiaceae family, is endemic to a valley within the Sullavai Sandstone plateau in close proximity to the Paleru Reservoir (Owk dam). The
species is a narrow endemic. No documented sightings of this species have been
recorded beyond the type locality since its description in 1994 by Venkataraju & Pullaiah as Dimorphocalyx kurnoolensis
from the Nandyal District of Andhra Pradesh. In this
study, the authors applied the grid method for quantification and subjected the
species to a meticulous analysis aligning with IUCN Red List Criteria. The
distribution was found to be restricted due to habitat (valley) fragmentation,
reservoir which is arresting seed dispersal, and destruction caused by tunnel
construction civil works. The area of occupancy (AOO) at 16 km² and the extent
of occurrence (EOO) at 0.474 km², were systematically computed using GeoCAT. The species is assessed here using the Red List
methodology for evaluating extinction risk. Based on its AOO, EOO, and
population size, it has been classified as Critically Endangered.
Keywords: Critically Endangered, endemic,
grid method, Nandyal, Owk
dam, quantification, small tree, sullavai sandstone,
type locality, unisexual flowers.
INTRODUCTION
Globally, there are 295,383 species and 13,164 genera of seed plants
(Bramwell 2002; Govaerts 2003; Christenhusz
& Byng 2016) among which 20% are threatened (Joppa et al. 2001). The
majority of these are in the tropics and subtropics. Often, an overestimation
of taxonomic or nomenclatural artefacts can be expected (Stefan 2004). As an
example of this, Indian floristic studies have not been published with species
distribution patterns and their endemism as a cumulative record for the entire
geographical region except in old floras such as Flora British India (Hooker
1872–1897). The Botanical Survey of India (BSI) is trying to complete a set of
volumes with detailed information on the species distribution and their
endemism. However, over 75% of species are not covered.
There is ambiguity in the list of species which are endemic and Red
Listed from India. According to Ravikanth et al.
(2018), about 1,052 species are Red Listed of which 387 are plant species. Most
of these 387 species are medicinal, among which 77 species are ‘Critically
Endangered’ (CR). In the Western Ghats alone, more than 100 plant species of
high economic importance are listed as threatened (Ravikanth
et al. 2018).
There are many reasons for these species becoming threatened. India,
like other countries, has had extensive developmental activities over the past
few decades in forested areas. Railway lines, power grids, dams, and urban
expansion have all taken their toll. The extensive exploitation of medicinal
plants (collection of crude drugs), podu-cultivation,
livestock grazing, dominant invasive species, and the disregard of government
regulations have pushed endemic and threatened species to higher levels of
risk. Immediate action is necessary to address these issues.
The IUCN Red List is centrally managed on a global level to address
species conservation issues. Four entities are involved in the IUCN Red List
Assessment process: (i) assessors, (ii) reviewers,
(iii) Red List Authorities (RLAs), and (iv) the IUCN Red List Unit (RLU).
Assessors gather data and apply the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria to
evaluate a species. Reviewers are independent experts who review the
assessments before they are submitted for final checks. RLAs, which typically
include IUCN Specialist Groups, Red List Partner institutions, or standalone
Red List Authorities, are responsible for assessing species within their remit.
The RLU acts as the gatekeeper for the Red List, ensuring that all published
assessments meet the required standards (IUCN 2016).
The steps involved in the assessment are (i)
data collection that is gathering data on species and identifying potential
risks, (ii) initial assessment in which assessors apply the IUCN Red list
categories and criteria, and (iii) peer review – an independent
experts review to ensure the accuracy and consistency of the assessment.
The assessment is submitted to the relevant RLA. Then, final checks are made by
RLU to verify that all standards are met. Publication is the last stage where
the assessment results are published on the IUCN Red List (IUCN 2016).
Baillon (1858) described the genus Tritaxis
based on T. gaudichaudii Bail., which features
three whorls of stamens in the type. Subsequently, two more species were
published under the genus Tritaxis, but later
they were transferred to other genera. For instance, Tritaxis
zeylanica Müll.Arg. was
moved as Paracroton zeylanicus
(Müll.Arg.) N.P.Balakr. & Chakrab.
and T. macrophylla Müll.Arg. became Paracroton pendulus
ssp. pendulus, while establishing Paracroton pendulus
ssp. zeylanicus (Thwaites) N.P.Balakr. & Chakrab.
The Dharmavana Nature Ark has undertaken the
conservation of threatened woody species from the Deccan Peninsula and Eastern
Ghats of India. The initiative began in 2004 by establishing a seedling
nursery. This was followed by plantation of species to a 400-acre site where
specific niches were designated for different groups of species.
During a visit to the type locality of Tritaxis
kurnoolensis (R.R.V.Raju & Pull.) R.Y.Yu & Welzen (Yu et
al. 2019) for seed collection, we were unable to find healthy seeds for nursery
development. It was observed that individuals of the species were facing high
stress and threat due to the dumping of stones and soil during the
establishment of a reservoir (Image 2a vs b) and particularly so during the
construction of inlet canals and the cutting of mature trees by the locals
(Image 4a–f). Subsequent visits in 2023 aimed to understand the growth,
survival, and recruitment as well as to obtain viable seeds. However, the
attempts to establish seedlings were unsuccessful as the seeds were not viable
(without kernal). Given the adverse conditions for
species establishment through natural recruitment, special attention was given
to conserving Tritaxis kurnoolensis,
focusing on seed germination, air layering, and root cuttings collection. The
focus now is on estimating the population size in the area and implementing
conservation measures in a systematic, step-by-step manner.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
To measure the size of the population and the count of mature
individuals, the authors categorized the habitat into four grids, each
measuring 2 × 2 km as IUCN recommended and default option in the GeoCat. The presence of Tritaxis
kurnoolensis was documented in each grid using
covering a 10 × 10 m area. Across the four grids, a total of 85 quadrats were
deployed, revealing a cumulative count of 164 mature individuals. The
population within each specific quadrat was then determined. The locations of
the taxon’s occurrence were recorded using the global positioning system (GPS).
For the IUCN Red List assessment, we employed GeoCAT
(Geospatial Conservation Assessment Tool), an open-source tool used to
calculate the taxon’s extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO)
based on GPS readings. These GPS readings, along with other data such as
catalogue ID, collector, country, event date, institution, locality, scientific
name of the taxon, state, and elevation, were entered into a CSV file and
uploaded to GeoCAT. A map was generated using GeoCAT (Bachman et al. 2011). This process is carried out
in a transparent, repeatable, and rapid manner within a user-friendly
interface, as described by Bachman et al. (2011). Based on the initial
assessment in the study area, the EOO and AOO for this taxon were approximated
in square kilometers (Figures 1 & 2).
RESULTS
Tritaxis kurnoolensis (R.R.V.Raju &
Pull.) R.Y.Yu & Welzen (= Dimorphocalyx
kurnoolensis R.R.V.Raju
& Pull. Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica 35:
201 (1994))
Monoecious deciduous small trees, up to 4-m high, bark dark brown,
scaly, blaze light yellowish-brown, branches terete, striate, pubescent. Leaves
glabrous, 5–15 × 3–7 cm, elliptic-oblong or obovate, base attenuate, margin
entire–sinuate, apex sub-acute obtuse; lateral veins up to nine pairs; petiole
up to 3 cm, shallowly channeled above; stipules deltoid. Inflorescens
terminal, lax receme. Male and female inflorescences
on different branches of same plant, diclinous flowers (Figure 3). Male flowers
cymose clusters on terminal pubescent peduncle;
peduncle up to 7 cm long; flowers subsessile, 4–5 mm
cross, ovate bud, pedicels to 2 mm long, bracts lanceolate, 1–2 × 2–3 mm,
densely pubescent, acute-acuminate; tepals in two whorls (5 + 5); outer green
(sepals), cupular, 5-lobed, connate, adpressed-pilose, lobes subovate
orbicular; inner (petals) white, polypetalous, each oblong, obtuse, often
emarginated, bent out. Stamens biseriate, 5+11–17; outer five basally connate
to the inner staminal column, filaments 1.8 mm; anthers 1.2 mm across, widely
oblong; inner (11–17) stamens on 7 mm long staminal column with their
individual 0.5 mm long connectives; anthers 0.8 mm across, monodelphous,
orbicular, acute; disc glands 5, free, ovate-oblate, hairy at top. Female
flowers few, in short pedunculate racemes; flowers 5–8 mm across; pedicel 8mm
long, pubescent; tepals in two whorls (5+5); outer (sepals) green, cupular, shortly 5-lobed, connate at base, adpressed-pilose without; lobes suborbicular, 2 × 2.5 mm;
inner (petals) white, polypetalous, oblong-obtuse, often emarginated; ovary 4 ×
3 mm, adpressed-pilose, three locular; styles 3,
connate at base, each 2-fid from above the middle, papillose; disc glands as in
the male flower. Capsule 1–1.3 × 1.3–1.7 cm, sub-globose, depressed, adpressed-pilose, 3-lobed, deeply furrowed, fruiting calyx
(sepals) deeply 5-lobed, lobes 5.5 × 3.5 mm, adpressed-pilose
without. Seed shiney, 8 × 7 mm, elliptic-oblong,
brown mottled with grey, tips acute, hilum circular, testa
smooth, ecarunculate (Image 1).
Flowering is in December–March and fruiting in February–April.
Habitat and Distribution
Tritaxis kurnoolensis is endemic to a valley where there is sullavai
sandstone (as surface stone). We chose the entire plateau of around 286 km2
as a study area for the present taxon IUCN assessment. This species is
associated with Ziziphus oenopolia (L.) Mill., Grewia
damine Gaertn., G. flavescens Juss., Ficus mollis Vahl, Pterospermum xylocarpum (Gaertn.) Oken, Ixora pavetta
Andrews (= Ixora arborea Roxb.
ex Sm.), Vitex leucoxylon L.f.,
and Tamarindus indica
L. Tritaxis kurnoolensis
is distributed in only one valley even though there are four valleys in the
study area.
This species has been in continuing decline because of reservoir and
tunnel construction. Prior to construction, trees likely lined the natural,
original water stream. Unfortunately, these water streams were converted into
canals for irrigation purposes resulting in a significant loss of habitat and
trees. This impact is particularly apparent following dam construction since
the natural dispersion of seeds and recruitment for the next generation were
severely depressed (Image 2a─f).
Threats
The seeds of this species disperse through an explosive fruit mechanism
at drying, contributing to a low probability of horizontal spreading. Seeds
disperse over a maximum radius of 5 m from the mother plant. Seeds are
relocated by rainwater and some may decompose in the reservoir. Mature stems
are harvested for firewood and serve as support sticks for banana plants.
Additionally, waste stones are dumped into the area due to water inlet (tunnels
which connect to the Gorukallu balancing reservoir
about 60 km away) development activities (Image 4). Owk
reservoir development commenced in 2003, greatly enlarging what was initially
two large ponds utilized for agricultural purposes.
IUCN Red List Assessment
Tritaxis kurnoolensis is restricted to a valley of the sandstone plateau of the Paleru reservoir (Owk dam) area, Nandyal District, Andhra Pradesh, India (Image 1a,b). Based on the distribution of the taxon and the decline
in the number of individuals since 1994, its habitat area has decreased from
3.48 km² to 0.474 km². In addition to ongoing threats such as forest fires,
reduced production of healthy seeds, and inadequate conditions for seed
germination, there is now a significant additional threat from waste stone
dumping on individuals confined to the valley. Considering these factors along
with the AOO and EOO values, population size, and number of locations, we have
evaluated its conservation status. Notable data parameter the EOO at 0.474km2
is calculated using a minimum convex polygon (MCP). The IUCN threat status is
classified under ‘Critically Endangered’ (CR) following IUCN (2022), verson 15.1 guidelines, B1ab(i,ii). This species meets B1- Extent of occurrence
(EOO) is less than 100 km2 (Image 2), B1a – number of locations is 1
(Image 1a), B2b (i) – decline in extent of occurrence
(Image 2a vs b), (ii) – decline in area of occupancy since 1994 (Image
2a vs b) from 3.48 km2 to 0.474 km2. Taking these
criteria, we concluded the species IUCN Red List threat status as ‘Critically
Endangered’. There is an immediate need to plan in situ and ex situ
conservation of this species. Research to monitor trends in population decline
and stop the threats are imperative.
Conservation Action
The Dharmavana Nature Ark team conducted several
seasonal visits from January 2023 to gather healthy seeds. However, due to the
lack of properly formed seeds, they initiated a regeneration strategy via
vegetative propagation such as air layering. The objective is to successfully
cultivate at least 10 individuals from various mother plants. Once these plants
thrive in pots, they will be transplanted to appropriate microhabitats within
the Dharmavana Nature Ark ecosystem that has been
strategically designed to accommodate different plant groups based on their
original habitats (Image 4).
DISCUSSION
The population of Tritaxis kurnoolensis is declining due to habitat fragmentation
and destruction caused by tunnel construction and reservoir civil works. The
species has become a narrow endemic, largely confined to a small area. Its
decline has been ongoing since 1994, following the conversion of two ponds into
a dam. Previously, the species was found along the bunds of the two ponds and
the canals that directed water to agricultural fields. However, with the
expansion of the ponds and the renovation of the canals, much of its habitat
has been lost. In addition to the dam’s construction, two connecting tunnels
from the Gorukallu Balancing Reservoir, about 60 km
away, have also contributed to its decline. During the excavation of these
tunnels, waste soil and stone were dumped on Tritaxis
kurnoolensis individuals, leading to the trapping
and drying out of many plants in recent years. We suspect that diminishing
population sizes coupled with human-made threats and habitat fragmentation have
driven species far below sustainable levels. Based on fruit setting and seed
germination percentages, we also suspect that inbreeding, loss of pollinators,
and climate change are contributing to the species’ extinction (Image 2a,b; Image 4). No documented sightings of this species have
been recorded since 1994 beyond the type locality from the Kurnool District
(now the area comes under newly formed Nandyal
District) of Andhra Pradesh. GeoCAT analysis reveals
a small AOO (16 km²), EOO (0.474 km²) and number of individuals less than 250,
categorizing the species as Critically Endangered. Urgent conservation action
is recommended by Dharmavana Nature Ark and the
authors to save this species, as the number of individual trees counted 213
(Table 1).
Table
1. Number of mature individuals of Tritaxis kurnoolensis counted in the study area.
|
Grid ID |
No. of individuals from 5 quadrants in a grid |
No. of individuals in whole grid (200 × 200 m) |
|
1 |
20 |
23 |
|
2 |
6 |
6 |
|
3 |
27 |
46 |
|
4 |
20 |
21 |
|
5 |
8 |
8 |
|
6 |
18 |
29 |
|
7 |
13 |
22 |
|
8 |
4 |
4 |
|
9 |
10 |
11 |
|
10 |
8 |
8 |
|
11 |
10 |
15 |
|
12 |
8 |
8 |
|
13 |
1 |
1 |
|
14 |
2 |
2 |
|
15 |
5 |
5 |
|
16 |
3 |
3 |
|
17 |
1 |
1 |
|
Total |
164 |
213 |
For
images - - click here for full PDF
REFERENCES
Bachman, S., J. Moat, A.W. Hill,
de J. Torre & B. Scott (2011). Supporting red list
threat assessments with GeoCAT: geospatial
conservation assessment tool. ZooKeys 150: 117–126. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.150.2109
Baillon, E.H. (1858). Étude
générale du groupe des Euphorbiacées. Victor Masson,
Paris. p. 342–343. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.50439 (https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/106467#page/352/mode/1up)
Bramwell, D. (2002). How many plant species are there? Plant Talk 28: 32–34.
Christenhusz, M.J.M. & J.W. Byng (2016). The number of known plants species in the world and its annual
increase. Phytotaxa 261(3): 201–217. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.261.3.1
Govaerts, R. (2003). How many species of
seed plants are there? - a response. Taxon 52: 583–584. https://doi.org/10.2307/3647457
Hooker, J.D. (1872–1897). Flora of British India, Vols 1–7. L.
Reeve & Co., 5, Henrietta Street, Covent GardenLondon.
IUCN (2016). Rules of Procedure for IUCN Red List Assessments 2017–2020. Version
3.0.
https://nc.iucnredlist.org/redlist/content/attachment_files/Rules_of_Procedure_for_IUCN_Red_List_2017-2020.pdf.
Accessed on 2
March 2022
IUCN Standards and Petitions
Committee (2022). Guidelines for Using
the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Version 15.1. Prepared by the
Standards and Petitions Committee.
https://www.iucnredlist.org/documents/RedListGuidelines.pdf Accessed on 14
December 2023.
Joppa L.N., D.L. Roberts &
S.L. Pimm (2011). How many species of
flowering plants are there?. Proceedings of the
Royal Society B. 278: 554–559. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.1004
Ravikanth, G., M.R. Jagadish, R. Vasudeva, R.U. Shaanker
& N.A. Aravind (2018). Recovery of
critically endangered plant species in India: need for a comprehensive
approach. Current Science 114(3): 504–511.
https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v114/i03/504-511
Stefan, U. (2004). How many plant species are there? And how many are threatened with
extinction? Endemic species in global biodiversity and conservation
assessments. Taxon 53(2): 481–484. https://doi.org/10.2307/4135626
Venkataraju, R.R. & T. Pullaiah (1994). Dimorphocalyx kurnoolensis,
a new species of Euphorbiaceae from India. Botanical
Bulletin of Academia Sinica 35(3): 201–204.
Yu, R.Y., J.W.S Ferry & P.C.V. Welzen
(2019). Molecular phylogeny of Trigonostemon and its relatives (Euphorbiaceae).
Taxon 68(5): 918–936. https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.12135