Journal of Threatened
Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 February 2024 | 16(2): 24730–24736
ISSN 0974-7907
(Online) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Print)
https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.8700.16.2.24730-24736
#8700 | Received 20 August 2023 | Final received 11 January 2024 |
Finally accepted 31 January 2024
Monitoring observations of the
southernmost breeding population of Long-billed Vultures Gyps indicus (Scopoli, 1786) (Aves: Acciptriformes:
Accipitridae) in the Nilgiri
Biosphere Reserve, India
S. Manigandan
1, H. Byju 2 &
P. Kannan 3
1 D/No 36, Dhoopakandi, Sholur-Kokkal, The Nilgiris, Tamil Nadu 643005, India.
2 Centre of Advanced Study in Marine Biology,
Annamalai University, Parangipettai,
Tamil Nadu 608502, India.
3 Department of Zoology, Thiru.Vi.Ka. Government Arts College, Thiruvarur,
Tamil Nadu 610003, India.
1 mani.wildlife1993@gmail.com
(corresponding author), 2 byjuhi@gmail.com, 3 perukannan@gmail.com
Editor: Chris Bowden, Royal Society for the
Protection of Birds (RSPB), Sandy, UK. Date of publication: 26 February
2024 (online & print)
Citation: Manigandan, S., H. Byju & P.
Kannan (2024). Monitoring observations of the southernmost breeding population
of Long-billed Vultures Gyps indicus (Scopoli,
1786) (Aves: Acciptriformes: Accipitridae)
in the Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 16(2): 24730–24736. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.8700.16.2.24730-24736
Copyright: © Manigandan et al. 2024. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International License. JoTT allows unrestricted use, reproduction, and
distribution of this article in any medium by providing adequate credit to the
author(s) and the source of publication.
Funding: Self-funded.
Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Author details: S. Manigandan has a
PhD on Vulture studies from Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve and is working with Centre for Wildlife Studies, Bangalore. H. Byju is a
researcher presently working on shorebirds on the south east coast of India. His earlier work was on vultures in Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve and presently collaborating with vulture studies on Moyar. P. Kannan is an associate professor in Zoology with an interest on herpetofauna.
Author contributions: SM—conceptualisation and writing; BH—design, writing and editing; PK—writing.
Acknowledgements: We thank the Tamil Nadu Forest Department for
providing support and permission to work in the Mudumalai
Tiger Reserve. Especially our sincere thanks to R. Kumar and N. Chandran
(anti-poaching watchers), for guiding us in the forest. Our sincere gratitude
to Arulagam and Bharathidasan for their support
during the entire period of fieldwork. Dr.
Ramakrishnan, assistant professor at the Government Arts and Science College, Ooty, is also highly appreciated for his guidance and
support.
Abstract: The Long-billed Vulture (LBV)
population was systematically monitored across four nesting colonies in the Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve (NBR) throughout three extended
breeding seasons. Breeding success rates between years ranged from 83.33% in
2018–2019 and 62.5% in 2020–2021. Nesting was monitored at the cliff sites,
consistent with prior research. Overall population fluctuations were minimal,
varying between 21 individuals in 2020–2021, 17 individuals in 2018–2019, and
16 individuals in 2019–2020. There was an apparent impact of forest fires and
other human disturbance activities, and certain proactive conservation measures
are proposed to help address these. There was indirect evidence of other
threats including poison baits targeting wild carnivores and non-steroidal
anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) being widely available for use in domestic
livestock. The study endorses the approach of establishing vulture-safe zones,
which focus on addressing the local threats. This includes raising awareness
about wildfire management, controlling toxic NSAIDs availability that are
harmful to vultures, discouraging the illegal use of poison-baits, and
highlighting the necessity of monitoring threats posed by power infrastructure.
Due to the high mobility of LBVs, all these threats need addressing through
large-scale vulture safe zone work (up to 100 km radius) surrounding the
breeding colonies to secure the LBV’s long-term survival. These conservation
actions are urgently needed.
Keywords: Conservation, Critically
Endangered, forest fire, livestock, NSAID, poison, vulture safe zone.
Introduction
The decline in the population of Gyps
vultures across the Indian subcontinent is largely attributed to accidental
poisoning resulting from their consumption of carcasses contaminated with the
non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) diclofenac (Oaks et al. 2004; Swan
et al. 2006). The Long-billed Vulture (LBV) Gyps indicus, is one
of the three native resident Gyps species in India. The LBV breeds in
southeastern Pakistan (Collar & Butchart 2013) and peninsular India south
of the Gangetic plain up to Delhi (Risebrough 2004),
eastward through Madhya Pradesh (Rasmussen & Anderton 2005), Telangana (Manchiryala & Medichet 2014),
Andhra Pradesh (Umapathy et al. 2009) and southwards
to the Nilgiris (Subramanya & Naveen 2006; Venkitachalam & Senthilnathan
2015; Manigandan et al. 2023), nesting primarily on
cliffs and occasionally ruins and has been observed only occasionally nesting
in trees in Bikaner, Rajasthan (Rasmussen & Anderton 2005). The Nilgiris is the southern limit of the species. The spectrum
of NSAIDs available in the veterinary market within the confines of the Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve (NBR), includes aceclofenac, ketoprofen, nimesulide,
and flunixin, all known to be toxic to vultures (Mathesh
et al. 2023) and this is a serious concern within the proposed vulture safe
zone (VSZ) of southern India (Manigandan 2018). These
observations prompted us to further monitor and understand the LBV population
within the NBR.
While efforts toward vulture
conservation have predominantly centered in the northern and eastern regions of
India, with research and captive breeding programs targeted at saving the three
Critically Endangered Gyps species—the White-rumped
Vulture Gyps bengalensis, LBV, and
Slender-billed Vulture Gyps tenuirostris
(Prakash et al. 2003; Bowden et al. 2012; Ranade et al. 2023), such initiatives
remain scarce in southern India. The prospect of establishing a similar captive
breeding centre in the south is currently being
deliberated both in Karnataka and in Hyderabad Zoo and is at various stages (MoEFCC 2020). Despite this, a conspicuous dearth of
information persists for both the ‘Endangered’ Egyptian Vulture Neophron percnopterus
(Byju & Raveendran 2022) and this ‘Critically
Endangered’ species (LBV) within the precincts of the NBR. The present study
aims to set some baseline information and evaluate recent LBV population
trends, providing some breeding success data, and evaluating conservation
challenges for this species in the Tamil Nadu landscape.
Study Area
The NBR (11.57310N
& 76.75580E), was established in 1986 in the southern Western
Ghats and connects the Western Ghats to the Eastern Ghats (Puyravaud
& Davidar 2013). Our study was restricted to MTR
and Sathya Mangalam Tiger Reserve (STR) of the NBR in Tamil Nadu (Figure 1).
This biosphere reserve includes areas of Tamil Nadu, Kerala, and Karnataka
states. Among the seven vulture species recorded
within the NBR, four are resident—Egyptian Vulture Neophron
percnopterus, Red-headed Vulture Sarcogyps calvus, White-rumped
Vulture Gyps bengalensis, and Long-billed
Vulture Gyps indicus; and three are scarce winter
migrants—Cinereous Vulture Aegypius monachus, Himalayan Griffon Vulture Gyps himalayensis, and Eurasian Griffon Vulture fulvus (Manigandan et
al. 2023).
Methods
LBV nesting behavior was assessed
by a combination of drawing upon prior research (Manigandan
et al. 2023), local villager insights from indigenous inhabitants for potential
nesting and roosting sites collected, local government officials, forest
guards, and researchers of Government Arts College, Ooty
along with the authors. Systematic visits were made between October and June,
covering the known vulture breeding period in the landscape (Stotrabhashyam et al. 2015). During this period, each LBV
nest site location was visited twice (15-day intervals) per month during
breeding seasons and assessments were based on the frequency of bird visits to
cliffs and on the presence of white droppings visible around the nesting site.
These observations were repeated for three successive breeding seasons:
2018–2019, 2019–2020, and 2020–2021. The selection of observation timings,
either in the morning (0600–1000 h) or the late afternoon (1700–2000 h)
depended on the visibility thereby avoiding some misty mornings and evenings.
These designated periods were determined both to optimize visibility due to
haze and addressing safety concerns from elephant movement and sloth bears in
the region. As LBVs are primarily cliff nesters, the survey focused on cliff-
searches and so could potentially have missed tree nesting pairs—although this
seems unlikely as we have been collecting secondary information from forest
dwellers from indigenous communities which has not revealed any tree-nesting of
LBVs. Each nest site was given a reference number for inter-year tracking.
Observations were made from carefully selected points that allowed clear
observation of the nest contents and birds’ behaviour.
All observations were made using a spotting scope (Nikon Pro Staff 3 16–48 x
60) and binoculars (Nikon Monarch M5 12 x 42 binoculars) from about
100–250 m to minimize disturbance. Also, we noted any potential threats
detected near nesting sites. We consulted published literature to assess the
availability of NSAIDs in the area (Manigandan 2018).
After analyzing the information, we went to nearby villages for further
investigation of each of the threats to vultures. We investigated whether
vultures had died of poisoning with the community stakeholders along with the
details of the mortality of cattle. Between 2018 and 2020, we conducted surveys
involving 208 pharmacy shops within the vulture safe zone area. These surveys
were carried out covertly, with the help of local community posing as livestock
owners. The objective was to assess the presence of NSAIDs that are harmful to
vultures in these establishments.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The study identified four
distinct nesting colonies of the LBV (Table 1). All breeding sites were on rock
cliffs adjacent to the river Moyar or its streams
(Images 1, 2). No LBVs were found breeding on trees. The locations of all
breeding sites detected together with habitat features, are presented in
(Tables 1, 2). Breeding success across the colonies and between years averaged
70.83% (Table 3). The reasons for nest failures were not determined directly,
but in the breeding season of 2018–2019, high breeding productivity of 83.33%
was observed across all four nesting colonies combined. Subsequently, during
the breeding season of 2019–2020, an overall breeding success rate of 66.66%
was recorded in the three LBV nesting colonies collectively. However, the breeding
success rate dropped to 62.5% in the season of 2020–2021. A new nesting site
was found in the 2020–2021 breeding season, but this site did not yield
successful breeding (Table 3). The LBV population monitoring revealed only
minor fluctuations. The highest count of LBV individuals (21) was documented in
the breeding season of 2020–2021. The previous breeding seasons, 2018–2019 and
2019–2020 had maximum sightings of 17 and 16 individuals, respectively (Table
1).
From our field observations and
interactions with local pharmacies, we confirmed that drugs that are harmful to
vultures (Nimesulide, ketoprofen, aceclofenac,
and flunixin) are still available in villages near the LBV nesting area. We
conducted an inspection of nesting trees along major rivers like Moyar, Sigur, and Siriyur, in these areas, and potential nesting places to
search for LBV nests. We also interacted with the forest department field staff
to find out if there were any LBV nests in trees during our regular monitoring
and found no tree-nesting of LBV in the study area. Notably, all identified
nests of Kallampalayam and Ebbanad
nesting sites were situated on east-facing cliffs.
The LBV population remained
relatively stable over the three years. But notably, the Ebbanad
nesting colony, in the years 2018–2019 harbored two nests, but only one nest in
the subsequent breeding season. This decline was attributed to observed
frequent disturbance by visitors from a nearby cottage frequented by tourists
that resulted in the birds being repeatedly flushed and may have caused the
birds to leave their nesting location. An illegally constructed cottage (Hitten Valley) was located 100–150 m away from the colony
with a viewpoint arranged for the tourists. We observed people screaming and
shouting during the daytime, followed by campfires in the night. Notably, in
the breeding season of 2020–2021, after the closure of this cottage, the number
of LBV nests increased (from one to two) in the Ebbanad
nesting colony (Table 3). The Kodanad nesting colony
encountered the impact of the 2019 forest fires as this nesting site has an
approximate 50% grass cover in the area. This incident almost certainly caused
the LBV pairs to abandon their nests as the nesting sites were surrounded by
grassland, and the impact of flames reached the nests in December 2019. We
recommend taking proactive steps to prevent fires. To reduce the impact of
forest fires on vulture colonies, it is imperative to strategically plan
pre-fire activities during non-breeding periods. The Kallampalayam
nesting colony exhibited a positive trend, with 100% breeding success rate in
2020–2021. This success is likely due to the colony’s limited exposure to
forest fires and lower human disturbances, as no signs of human presence were
detected near the nesting area during the study period.
Poison baits incident
The regular monitoring led to the
discovery of a poison-bait mortality incident within the Karuventrayan
malai nesting colony. LBVs were observed incubating
during November 2020; however, they were conspicuously absent from this nesting
site in December 2020 and January 2021. This deviation from expected nesting
behavior prompted further investigation. It was discovered that on 3 December
2020, four Asiatic Wild Dogs had succumbed to a poison-bait incident in the
vicinity. Significantly, it was reported by locals that three vultures had also
indirectly fallen victim to the poisoning, apparently a case of retaliatory
killing of wild carnivores which had recently caused mortality in domestic
livestock. Several locals were arrested for this incident by the forest
department and this is subject to further investigation. Instances of vulture
fatalities due to poison baits necessitate thorough investigations to ascertain
the motivation and full circumstances relating to the incidents, and it is
often difficult to establish the full story. Identifying the sources and
mechanisms of poisoning is essential to allow the implementation of targeted
interventions to prevent further losses (Ogada et al.
2012).
Evidence of other threats
Interestingly, the fatality of a
Himalayan Griffon Vulture was observed under powerlines, apparently a result of
electrocution in NBR (Manigandan et al. 2021) with a
burning smell of tissues reported although no tissue testing was done due to a
lack of facilities.
The potential accessibility of
harmful substances to vultures, specifically from toxic NSAIDs (Nimesulide, ketoprofen, aceclofenac,
and flunixin) which were found to be available for use in cattle from local
pharmacy outlets adds to the threat to vultures as the covert survey done
during the period from the proposed VSZ (Manigandan
2018). Apart from the wider availability of safer drug meloxicam, other
harmful drugs sold in the market such as ketoprofen and nimesulide
is a major concern in vulture conservation of NBR, as this study concentrated
on pharmacies in the districts of Nigiris, Erode, Tirupur and Coimbatore,
adjacent to the VSZ. The collaborative efforts of the forest department and
local NGOs in monitoring the availability of NSAIDs in pharmacy shops are
commendable as they create awareness among the local community, pharmacy shop
owners, and staff about the importance of vultures in society and the harmful
effects of NSAIDs. However, pharmacy shop owners are only aware of diclofenac
and not aware of other harmful drugs (Manigandan et
al. 2023). To prevent the accidental poisoning of vultures, it is important to
make sure that these substances are not accessed by vultures and above all that
they are not used in livestock practices when affordable alternatives like
meloxicam and tolfenamic acid are available.
Villagers typically bury naturally deceased cattle, while livestock killed by
wild animals, particularly those within the forest, are left in the open and
available to vultures. If such incidents occur near the village, the animals
are always buried.
CONCLUSION
To tackle the challenges faced by
vulture conservation, the approach of the establishment of vulture-safe zones
has been developed (Thapa et al. 2009; Mukherjee et al. 2014; Insua-Cao et al. 2022). Such conservation endeavors are
playing a key role in safeguarding the remaining LBV population in NBR, along
with the other nesting vulture species in the area, White-rumped
Vulture (WRV). The conclusions from this three-year study suggest that vulture
safe zone activities may best focus in this area on the following: a)
optimizing fire management practices; b) controlling NSAID availability for
veterinary use; c) investigating poison baits incidents; and d) monitoring the
threat and safety of power infrastructure. Hence, a comprehensive vulture safe
zone approach will be needed addressing all of these issues along with raising
local awareness of the positive attributes of vultures. Local human disturbance
may also be a further threat. The imperative lies in the coordinated commitment
of researchers, government agencies, NGOs, and local communities to ensure the
long-term survival of LBV populations. In conclusion, this monitoring study
demonstrates how local threats can be determined through regular monitoring and
follow-up, and how widescale vulture safe zone work is needed to secure the
future of vulture populations.
Table 1. Population
trend of Long-billed Vulture Gyps indicus in three breeding seasons from
2018–2021.
|
Name of the nesting colonies |
Long-billed Vulture
population |
||
|
2018–2019 |
2019–2020 |
2020–2021 |
|
|
Ebbanad |
6 |
3 |
5 |
|
Kodanad |
8 |
8 |
5 |
|
Kallampalayam |
3 |
5 |
9 |
|
Karuvendrayan Malai |
0 |
0 |
2 |
|
Total |
17 |
16 |
21 |
Table 2. Nesting habitat of Long-billed Vulture (LBV) Gyps
indicus in the study area.
|
LBV nesting colony site |
Protected area |
Type of forest |
Elevation (m) |
GPS location |
Distance from the nearest
village |
|
|
Latitude N |
Longitude E |
|||||
|
Ebbanad |
MTR |
Dry thorn and moist deciduous |
1,064 |
11.515174° |
76.770592° |
1.88 km |
|
Kodanad |
MTR |
Dry thorn and moist deciduous |
1,661 |
11.538914° |
76.911514° |
2.27 km |
|
Kallampalayam |
MTR |
Moist deciduous |
854 |
11.532109° |
76.967859° |
3.11 km |
|
Karuvendrayan Malai |
STR |
Moist deciduous |
830 |
11.560016° |
77.024215° |
3.71 km |
MTR—Mudumalai
Tiger Reserve | STR—Sathya Mangalam Tiger Reserve.
Table 3. Breeding
success of Long-billed Vultures Gyps indicus from 2018–2021 (three
seasons).
|
Name of the nesting colony |
2018–2019 |
2019–2020 |
2020–2021 |
Overall % |
|||||||||
|
Total number of nests with eggs |
Number of nests seen with
hatchlings |
Number of hatchlings
successfully fledged |
Hatchling success percentage |
Total number of nests under
incubation |
Number of nests seen with
hatchlings |
Number of hatchlings fledged |
Hatchling success percentage |
Total number of nests under
incubation |
Number of nests seen with
hatchlings |
Number of hatchlings fledged |
Hatchling success percentage |
|
|
|
Ebbanad |
2 |
2 |
2 |
100 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
100 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
50 |
83.3% |
|
Kodanad |
3 |
2 |
2 |
66.66 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
66.66 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
50 |
61% |
|
Kallampalayam |
1 |
1 |
1 |
100 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
50 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
100 |
83.3% |
|
Karuvendrayan Malai |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Total |
6 |
5 |
5 |
83.33 |
6 |
4 |
4 |
66.66 |
8 |
5 |
5 |
62.5 |
70.83% |
For
figure & images - - click here for full PDF
References
Bowden,
C.G.R., V. Prakash, S. Ranade, A. Routh, R.D. Jakati,
R.J. Cuthbert, A.R. Rahmani, R.E. Green, N. Prakash
& J. Parry-Jones (2012). Conservation breeding for the future release of the Critically
Endangered Asian Gyps vultures progress of the program in south Asia and
why it is so important. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 109(1):
43–45.
Byju, H. & N. Raveendran (2022). Egyptian Vultures extending to
new landscapes in southern Tamil Nadu: need for measures. Bird-o-soar #170, In:
Zoo’s Print 37(6): 37–40.
Collar, N.J.
& S.H.M. Butchart (2013). Conservation breeding and avian diversity: chances and
challenges. International Zoo Yearbook 48(1): 7–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/izy.12039
Insua-Cao, P., P.R. Sachin, S. Rohan, S. Bharathidasan & S. Prakash (2022). Vulture safe zones of India.
Vulture Conservation in Asia. Hornbill 113–119.
Manchiryala, R. & R.M. Medicheti (2014). Breeding biology of Critically
Endangered Long-billed Vulture (Gyps indicus) at a unique site in
Telangana State, India. Ambient Science 3(1): 49–51. https://doi.org/10.21276/ambi.2016.03.1.nn01
Manigandan, S. (2018). The Survey on prevalence of
Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) in the Nilgiris,
Tamil Nadu, pp. 90–93. In: Ramakrishnan, B. (ed.). Securing Vulture
Population in Southern India. Proceedings of the workshop conducted from
8th to 10th, January, 2018 at Udhagamandalam, The Nilgiris.
Manigandan, S., H. Byju
& P. Kannan (2023). Assessing the accuracy of population estimation methods for vulture
populations: a case study from the Mudumalai Tiger
Reserve, Tamil Nadu, India. Environmental and Experimental Biology 21:
45–52. https://doi.org/10.22364/eeb.21.06
Manigandan, S., P. Kannan, H. Byju & S. Bharathidasan (2021). Death of a Himalayan Vulture in
South India highlights the potential threat of power infrastructure. Vulture
News 80: 20–22.
Mathesh K., K. Manickam, J.W. Mallord, K. Mahendran, M.A. Kumar, S. Debasish, C.S. Mohan,
V. Beena, P.S. Lakshmi, N. Prakash, R. Shringarpure, M.P. Abhijit M, R.E. Green, V. Naidoo &
V. Prakash (2023). Experimental safety testing confirms that the NSAID nimesulide
is toxic to Gyps vultures in India. Environmental Toxicology and
Pharmacology 103: 104284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2023.104284
MoEFCC (2020). Action Plan for Vulture
Conservation in India, 2020–2025. Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change,
Government of India, 118 pp.
Mukherjee,
A., T.H. Galligan, V. Prakash, K. Paudel, U. Khan, S.
Prakash, S. Ranade, K. Shastri, R. Dave, P. Donald & C. Bowden (2014). Vulture Safe Zones to save Gyps
Vultures in South Asia. Mistnet 15(3): 4–21.
Oaks, J.L.,
M.Z. Gilbert, M.Z. Virani, R.T. Watson, C.U. Meteyer,
B.A. Rideout, H.L. Shivaprasad, S. Ahmed, M.J. Iqbal
Chaudhry, M. Arshad, S. Mahmood, A. Ali & A.A. Khan (2004). Diclofenac residues as the cause
of vulture population decline in Pakistan. Nature 427: 630–633. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02317
Ogada, D.L., F. Keesing
& M.Z Virani (2012). Dropping dead: causes and consequences of vulture population declines
worldwide. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1249(1): 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06293.x
Prakash V.,
D.J. Pain, A.A. Cunningham, P.F. Donald, N. Prakash, A. Verma,
R. Gargi, S. Sivakumar & A.R. Rahmani (2003). Catastrophic collapse of Indian
White-backed Gyps bengalensis and long-billed Gyps
indicus vulture populations. Biological Conservation 109(3):
381–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00164-7
Puyravaud, J.P. & P. Davidar (2013). The Nilgiris
Biosphere Reserve: an unrealized vision for conservation. Tropical
Conservation Science 6(4): 468–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/194008291300600401
Ranade, S.,
J. Gore & A. Kumar (2023). Breeding of Himalayan Vulture Gyps himalayensis Hume, 1869 (Aves: Accipitriformes:
Accipitridae) in the Assam State Zoo, Guwahati,
Assam, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 15(7): 23601–23605. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.8607.15.7.23601-23605
Rasmussen,
P.C. & J.C. Anderton (2005). Birds of South Asia. The Ripley
Guide, Vols. 1 and 2. Smithsonian Institution and Lynx Edicions,
D.C. and Barcelona, 116 pp.
Risebrough, R. (2004). Conservation biology: Fatal
medicine for vultures. Nature 427(6975): 596–598. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02365
Stotrabhashyam, S., B. Reddy, V. Satla & I. Siddiqui (2015). A breeding site record of
Long-billed Vulture Gyps indicus (Aves: Accipitriformes:
Accipitridae) from Bejjur
Reserve Forest, Telangana, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 7(1):
6800–6804. https://doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.o4014.6800-4
Subramanya,
S. & O.C. Naveen (2006). Breeding of long-billed vulture Gyps indicus at Ramanagaram hills, Karnataka, India. Indian Birds 2:
32–34.
Swan G., V.
Naidoo, R. Cuthbert, R.E. Green, D.J. Pain, D. Swarup, V. Prakash, M.Taggart, L. Bekker,
D. Das, J. Diekmann, E. Killian, A. Meharg, R.C. Patra, M. Saini & K. Wolter (2006). Removing the
threat of diclofenac to critically endangered Asian vultures. PLoS Biology 4(3): e66. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040066
Thapa, I. (2009). An overview of
culture Conservation in Nepal. The Initiation 3(2009): 114–118.
Umapathy, G., S. Hussain & S. Shivaji (2009). Status and distribution of
vultures in Andhra Pradesh, India. Forktail
(25): 163–165.
Venkitachalam, R. & N. Senthilnathan
(2015). Breeding
Record of Indian Vulture (Gyps indicus) in Moyar
Valley, Tamil Nadu, India. Current Science 109(2): 258–259.