Journal of Threatened
Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 July 2024 | 16(7): 25507–25515
ISSN 0974-7907
(Online) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Print)
https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.8247.16.7.25507-25515
#8247 | Received 31 October 2022 | Final received 05 July 2024 | Finally
accepted 09 July 2024
Current conservation status of
Bengal Florican Houbaropsis bengalensis in Manas National
Park, Assam, India
Miranda Thakur 1 , Jonmani Kalita 2 ,
Namita Brahma 3, Koushik Rajbongshi 4,
Kangkanjyoti Bhattacharyya 5, Amal Chandra
Sarmah 6, Alolika
Sinha 7 , Deba Kumar Dutta 8, Dhritiman Das 9
& Bibhuti Prasad Lahkar
10
1,2,4,5,7,10 Aaranyak- 13 Tayab
Ali Byelane, Bishnu Rabha
Path, Beltola, Guwahati, Assam 781028, India.
3 TISS Guwahati- Tetalia Road, Jalukbari,
Guwahati, Assam 781013, India.
6 Office of the Field Director- Manas Tiger Project, Barpeta
Road, Assam 781315, India.
8 WWF India- Barpeta
Road, Milan Nagar, Assam 781315, India.
9 Pygmy Hog Research and Breeding
Centre- Bashistha, Indira Nagar Road, Guwahati, Assam
781029, India.
1 14mirandathakur@gmail.com, 2
jonmani@aaranyak.org (corresponding author), 3 namita.brahma@tiss.edu,
4 koushik@aaranyak.org, 5 kangkanjyotibhattacharyya1@gmail.com,
6 amal.sarmah14@gmail.com, 7 alolika@aaranyak.org,
8 debakumerdutta@gmail.com, 9 dhritiz@gmail.com,
10 bibhuti@aaranyak.org
Editor: Hem S. Baral,
Ullens School, Lalitpur Nepal. Date of publication: 26 July 2024
(online & print)
Citation: Thakur, M., J. Kalita,
N. Brahma, K. Rajbongshi, K. Bhattacharyya, A.C. Sarmah, A. Sinha, D.K. Dutta, D. Das & B.P. Lahkar (2024). Current conservation status of
Bengal Florican Houbaropsis bengalensis
in Manas National Park, Assam, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 16(7): 25507–25515. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.8247.16.7.25507-25515
Copyright: © Thakur et al. 2024. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
License. JoTT
allows unrestricted use, reproduction, and distribution of this article in any
medium by providing adequate credit to the author(s) and the source of
publication.
Funding: The Habitats Trust, WCS Cambodia.
Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Author details: See end of this article.
Author contributions: MT and JK contributed to data collection, scientific analysis, and manuscript writing. KR, AS, and KB contributed to data collection. NB, DD, and BPL critically analyzed all findings. ACS led the team, supported by DKD, DD and BPL.
Acknowledgements: We thank Manas National Park range officers Babul Brahma, Kameswar Boro and the frontline staff for their
support throughout the survey. We would also like to express our gratitude to Dr. Jyoti Das, Dr. Biswajit Chakdar, Dr. Joydev Mandal, Dr. Hilloljyoti Singha, Mr. Udayan Borthakur, and Mr. Rustom Basumatary for their assistance during the survey period. We are grateful to the
Habitats Trust for their financial support through
the Pygmy Hog Conservation Programme and to WCS Cambodia for enabling us to
undertake the field survey and other activities.
Abstract: This study aimed to examine the
current conservation status of the ‘Critically Endangered’ bird species Houbaropsis bengalensis
(Gmelin, 1789), commonly known as the Bengal
Florican or Bustard, in Manas National Park in Assam.
The grasslands of this park, once home to the largest population of Bengal
Floricans in India, are undergoing natural and anthropogenic changes. Field
surveys conducted from February to April 2021 to assess florican populations
recorded 50 males and 17 females, while a 2009 survey estimated 24 males in Manas NP (Brahma et al. 2009), indicating long-term
population increase. Land use and land cover change maps of florican habitats
were created using supervised classification. Grassland habitats face several
threats, including uncontrolled natural succession coupled with livestock
grazing, growth of invasive alien plants and collection of non-timber forest
products (NTFPs) by local people. These disturbances reflect the condition of
grasslands that are home to a wide variety of wildlife, including grassland
specialists like Pygmy Hog Porcula salvania, Hispid Hare Caprolagus
hispidus, Hog Deer Axis porcinus,
and mega herbivores like Indian Rhino Rhinoceros unicornis,
wild Water Buffalo Bubalus arnee, Eastern Swamp Deer Rucervus
duvaucelii ranjitsinhi,
Gaur Bos gaurus, and Asian Elephant Elephas
maximus. These findings indicate an urgent need to protect and restore
grasslands for conservation of the Bengal Florican and other
grassland-dependent species.
Keywords: Aves, conservation threats,
grassland specialists, habitat supervised classification, habitat disturbance, Otididae, sub-Himalayan grassland.
INTRODUCTION
Bengal Florican, Houbaropsis bengalensis (Gmelin, 1789), is a ‘Critically Endangered’ grassland bird
(IUCN 2022) belonging to the family Otididae. In
India, it is protected under Schedule I of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972.
The population of Bengal Florican is 350–400 in India, <100 in
Nepal (Collar et al. 2017; Baral et al. 2020) and
<500 individuals in Cambodia (BirdLife
International 2022). In India, the population of Bengal Florican is
restricted to the sub-Himalayan region of the Indo-Gangetic floodplains and the
Brahmaputra floodplains (Rahmani et al. 2017). They
are extremely habitat specialists and are restricted to grasslands (Prasai et al. 2021). Bengal Floricans were once
distributed from Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, and West Bengal to the foothills of
Assam and Arunachal Pradesh in India. However, at present, it is confined to a
few protected areas in India including Manas National
Park (MNP), Kaziranga National Park, Orang National
Park, Dibru-Saikhowa National Park, Burachapori Wildlife Sanctuary in Assam, D’Ering Wildlife Sanctuary in Arunachal Pradesh, and Dudhwa National Park in Uttar Pradesh. The species is
confined to only these few protected areas and appears nowhere outside these
areas (BirdLife International 2022).
In 1989–90, the Bombay Natural
History Society (BNHS) conducted a survey in India and found that Manas National Park had the highest Bengal Florican
population. Around 80 birds were estimated during the study, which is perhaps
the largest known population of Bengal Florican in any single locality.
However, the
population of Bengal Floricans declined from 1990–2000 because of the
socio-political unrest created during Bodo agitation in the areas adjoining Manas. However, according to reports, the population has
shown an increasing trend from 2003–2012 (Brahma et al. 2009). The
population of Bengal Florican was estimated to be around 50 individuals in
Manas National Park (Brahma et al. 2009). Since
1989–1990, approximately 40% of the Bengal Florican population has been
lost, and grass height was the main factor. It is assumed that these birds are
site-selective in establishing their territory, and prefer wet alluvial
grassland for breeding, which is reduced by 47% and succeeding towards savanna
grassland (Brahma 2013). The global population of the species has been
rapidly declining, and the IUCN Red List for Threatened Species has upgraded
Bengal Florican from ‘Endangered’ to ‘Critically Endangered’ (BirdLife International 2010).
The highest number of Bengal
Floricans was reported from Kokilabari Agriculture
Farm (KAF) (Brahma et al. 2009). The KAF is 9 km2, which is a large
grassland site. The KAF is under extensive agricultural practice and leased to
local communities for paddy cultivation. Paddy cultivation began in June and
harvested in December. It has been reported that the Bengal Florican population
was established during 2000–2001, the period when the farm was not under
cultivation. One reason for the selection of these sites by Bengal Floricans is
the lack of waterlogging (Brahma et al. 2009).
The aim of this study is to
address the lack of information on the populations and habitats of the Bengal
florican in Manas National Park through a systematic
approach, thereby contributing to the development of long-term conservation
strategies. This research serves as a stepping stone for further research and education
aimed at preserving the Bengal florican and its habitat.
METHODS
Study site
Manas National Park
Manas National Park (MNP) is a World
Heritage Site, a Tiger Reserve, a Biosphere Reserve, and an Elephant Reserve
located in the state of Assam (Das et al. 2022). MNP ((26.583–26.833 0N,
90.750–91.250 0E) is the core area of Manas
Tiger Reserve with an area of 500 km2, located in Baksa and Chirang districts of
the Bodoland Territorial Council, Assam (Figure 1). Apart from Bengal Floricans
the grasslands are home to a wide variety of wildlife including grassland
specialist like Pygmy Hog Porcula salvania, Hispid Hare Caprolagus
hispidus, Hog Deer Axis porcinus
and other mega herbivorous like Indian Rhino Rhinoceros unicornis,
Brahma et al. 2009 Wild Water Buffalo Bubalus
arnee, Eastern Swamp Deer Rucervus
duvaucelii ranjitsinhi,
Gaur Bos gaurus, and Asian Elephant Elephas
maximus. It is a regional priority site for the conservation of charismatic
species, including 55 mammals, 50 reptiles, and more than 450 bird species (Sarma et al. 2008; Das et al. 2022). A total of 462
plant species have been reported from within the national park, but the
region is rich in plant life with about 622 plant species reported from the
larger Manas Biosphere region. This includes 429
dicotyledons, 162 monocotyledons, 30 pteridophytes, and one gymnosperm (Hajra & Baishya 2002). It
lies at an altitude of 57–280 m. The temperature ranges from 6–37 °C. The
rainfall lies between 3,000 mm to 4,000 mm per year. The rainfall reaches its
peak in July and August. The vegetation of the park is moist deciduous forest,
early successional woodland grassland, and dry-wet alluvial grassland (Sarma et al. 2008; Banerjee et al. 2021). Due to resource
extraction by local communities and livestock grazing, MNP experiences biotic
pressure. Local people may start fires to encourage the growth of fresh grass,
but processes are mostly initiated by park managers to control woody plant
encroachment into grassland areas. However, the dynamics of fires after
ignition are not controlled by forest managers, and the spatial patterns and
extent of fires are determined by habitat factors (Banerjee et al. 2021).
Methods for population assessment
The survey was conducted based on
habitat maps and past records of the complete population census of Bengal
Florican. The surveys were carried out in the three ranges, namely, Bansbari, Bhuyanpara, and Panbari of Manas National Park
during the peak breeding season of the Bengal Florican from 20 February–22
April 2021. Birds were observed using vehicles, walking on foot, or from
elevated forest towers. Sightings and GPS locations were recorded. Field
surveys were carried out during the early morning (0600–0930 h) and late
evening (1500–1800 h). On certain days, the survey was conducted until noon.
The number of Bengal Floricans spotted, the number of males and females
sighted, the time of sightings, along with the location of the species were
recorded. Since, the species is territorial in nature during the breeding
season, the display site of a male, was considered as an individual male
territory and each displaying male was recorded as an individual male and the
females are difficult to locate (Images 1 & 2). The breeding territories
were identified and marked using handheld GPS (Garmin etrex
30x) and GIS-based map of identified Bengal Florican territories was prepared
using QGIS (QGIS Development Team 2020).
The methodologies employed in
this survey were consistent with those used in the studies by Brahma (2013) and
Narayan (1992). Similar techniques and area coverage were utilized to ensure
comparability between the current and previous surveys. No higher conservation
technologies were employed during this survey, maintaining the same level of
effort and methodological approach as in the earlier studies.
Method for land cover change
Satellite images from 2000 and
2020 were analyzed to detect the change in land cover using remote sensing and
geographic information system tools. The open-source satellite images were
obtained from Landsat 7 and Landsat 8 through https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov.
Landsat 7 and Landsat 8 images were used for classification at 30 x 30 m
resolution and I, II III, IV, V, VII and II, III, IV, V, VI, VII bands were
used respectively. Open-source QGIS software (QGIS Development Team 2020) was
used to classify the image objects. Using supervised classification, Bengal
Florican record sites were classified and land cover
changes were analyzed and the classified habitat into three classes: grassland, woodland, and grassland woodland
mosaic.
Method for vegetation survey
First, a grid map of Florican
locations was prepared using GIS. The standardized grid size was 1 × 1 km. The
total area of grassland was divided into 10; 1 x 1 km blocks. Within each 1 x 1
km grid area, 10 quadrats of × 1 m were placed centrally. To fulfill the
objectives, quadrat sampling method (Stohlgren et al.
1995) was used for the quantitative study of the vegetation of Bengal
Florican.
Method for disturbance study
To study the disturbance drivers
of the Bengal florican and their habitats, the same 1 x 1 km grids were used
for data collection. Cattle grazing, the presence of invasive alien plant
species, problematic native species, and other human-induced disturbances were
recorded.
RESULT
Distribution and population
status
Houbaropsis bengalensis were recorded from Bansbari, Bhuyanpara, and Panbari grasslands. (Figure 3, Table 1). 50 males and 17 females were observed in Kuribeel, Rupahi, Sidajhar, Kokilabari, Bhumuk, Abiwidora, Agrang, and Murabari (Table 1).
Eighteen males were sighted displaying: nine in Kokilabari,
four in Rupahi, three in Agrang,
and two in Kuribeel. The highest number of
individuals were sighted in Kokilabari located in the
Bhuyanpara range of the National Park, followed by Rupahi and Kuribeel. Seven males
were observed during flight, looking at their flight direction. Females are
difficult to spot, and direct observations estimate the total count of Bengal
Floricans to be 74 (Table 2). No floricans could be sighted in areas such as Kasindaha, Mahout Camp Fields, Palsiguri,
Uchila-Bongali Hathdhowa,
Bura Buri Jhar, Dighlatari, and Pohu Field, where
floricans had been previously reported (Narayan 1992; Brahma 2013).
Table 3 list the names of
grassland blocks located in Manas National Park where
Bengal Floricans have been reported in the past and in the current study. The
map was generated using QGIS to study and compare Bengal Florican locations
in grasslands over the last few decades. The results of past surveys carried
out in 1989 (Narayan 1992), 2011 (Brahma 2013), and 2021 were used to compare
the data with those of the current study (Figures 2 & 3).
Land cover change
The results indicated habitat
changes in vegetation within the recorded site. In the year 2000; 11.7 km2 area
of grassland represent 79%, 3.03 km2 area of grassland woodland
mosaic represent 21%, and 0.036 km2 area of woodland are represent
0.24 % (Table 4, Figures 4 & 6). In the year 2020; 7.3 km2 area
of grassland represent 49.6%, 0.75 km2 area of
woodland represent 5.1%, and 6.67 km2 area of grassland
woodland mosaic represent 45.3% (Table 5, Figures 5 & 6). From 2000–2020; 4.7
km2 of grassland area was converted to mosaic representing 32%,
0.49 km2 of grassland area was converted to woodland representing
3.4%, 0.0009 km2 of the mosaic area was converted to a
waterbody representing 0.01%, 0.81 km2 of the mosaic area was converted
to grassland representing 5.5%, 0.24 km2 mosaic area converted
to woodland representing 1.63%, and 0.02 km2 woodland area converted
to mosaic representing 0.13% (Table 6).
Vegetation survey
The grasslands were burned in the
month of February and a fresh flush of grasses emerged soon after establishing
a suitable habitat for the Bengal Floricans to breed. The following plant
species were observed during the survey (Table 7). And most of the Bengal
Florican habitats where they are recorded in the grassland have short grass Imperata cylindrica and
moderately tall and dense grasses like Saccharum
spontaneum and Saccharum
narenga.
Threats
The grasslands of the park are
subjected to a number of natural and anthropogenic disturbances. The conversion
of grasslands into woodlands is a serious threat to grassland species. Bombax
ceiba (Simul), a tree species was found growing extensively in the
grasslands. Cattle grazing is one such disturbance that has been observed in
the National Park. The grazing of livestock by communities living in the
fringes of the National Park is one of the major causes of habitat degradation.
Premna herbacea,
a medicinal herb that grows profusely in the grasslands of Manas
is a major non-timber forest products (NTFPs). Local communities depend on
these products for their livelihoods. The presence of humans in these
grasslands inhabited by Bengal Floricans is another cause of disturbance to the
species. The presence of invasive alien plants is another major disturbance to
the habitat. Chromaelaena odorata
a shrub was found growing extensively in the grasslands of the national park
occupied by Bengal Floricans.
DISCUSSION
Our survey estimated 74 Bengal
Floricans in Manas, which compared to 2011 represents
an increase (Figure 3). The Florican number 74 is higher than the result of the
last survey conducted in 2011 (Brahma 2013), but lower than the result of a
previous survey conducted in 1989 (Narayan 1992). Interestingly, at least 20
male floricans and seven female floricans were recorded at the Kokilabari Agriculture Farm (KAF). The highest number of
floricans was recorded in KAF. Thus, there is a long term need to conserve such
sites such as the KAF for long term conservation of the species.
The survey for Bengal Floricans
in Manas National Park provides important evidence
for the presence of Bengal Floricans at the study site. It also indicates an
increasing trend since the last survey carried out in 2011 which is encouraging
(Brahma 2013). This survey also provided new information from previously
surveyed areas such as Murabari, Abiwidora,
and Bhumuk grassland areas, where Floricans have been
recorded. The survey also clearly indicated the success of the method wherein
the collaboration between forest frontline staff, invited experts and local
guides was instrumental in obtaining a quick result.
The Bengal florican population in
Manas has faced severe problems due to habitat loss
and degradation, with grassland habitats decreasing alarmingly. Key factors
contributing to this conservation challenge include the indiscriminate
conversion of grasslands, domestic cattle grazing, unauthorized burning,
opportunistic hunting, and egg collection. Invasive species such as Chromolaena and Mikania further exacerbate
the problem by outcompeting native flora crucial for Bengal florican survival.
Despite these challenges, our data shows a paradoxical increase in the Bengal
florican population. This can be attributed to the concentrated conservation
efforts by stakeholders, particularly within the KAF areas, which host sizable
populations contributing to the overall increase in the park. However, the
persistence of habitat issues necessitates robust management interventions to
ensure sustainable population growth.
In Assam, most grasslands are
confined to protected areas and a few in the Brahmaputra floodplains. Thus,
conserving these grasslands is imperative to protect grassland-obligate
avifauna (Brahma 2013). Scientific studies are essential to manage these
remaining grasslands effectively. Our study involved mapping the habitat and
assessing the current Bengal Florican population in Manas.
While it is encouraging that the BF population is increasing in Manas, the concurrent decrease in grassland habitat is
concerning. While an increase in vegetation cover is often beneficial for
forests, in Manas, the increase in specific land
cover types such as woodland and woody plant infested mosaic forest poses a
serious threat to the unique grassland habitat (Das et al. 2022). Burning of
grasslands conducted in January aimed to regenerate grasses and control
invasive species. However, this practice is insufficient to reduce the
encroachment of alien invasive plants and problematic native plants (Das et al.
2019). Therefore, appropriate habitat management actions must be undertaken to
restore and conserve grassland habitats.
Recommendations
- Maintenance of mosaic
grassland: Which include both tall and short grasslands.
- Implement comprehensive habitat
restoration programs to remove invasive species and native woody species.
- Strategic implementation of
prescribed burning.
- Enforce stricter regulations
against unauthorized land conversion, grazing, and burning.
- Promote conservation friendly
agricultural practices adjacent to grassland areas, especially in KAF.
- Engage local communities in
conservation efforts through education and incentivizing sustainable practices.
- Conduct long-term scientific
studies to monitor the impact of management practices in BF population.
Table
1. Bengal Florican sightings along with GPS locations.
|
|
Locations |
Area |
Number of males sighted |
Number of territories established (Female) |
|
1 |
N26.74857, E91.17289 |
Kokilabari |
20 |
7 |
|
2 |
N26.68549, E91.02865 |
Kuribeel |
5 |
2 |
|
3 |
N26.68469, E91.04027 |
Bhumuk |
2 |
0 |
|
4 |
N26.71303, E91.08633 |
Rupahi |
7 |
4 |
|
5 |
N26.72930, E91.08080 |
Abiwidora |
3 |
3 |
|
6 |
N26.71128, E91.15022 |
Agrang |
7 |
0 |
|
7 |
N26.68044, E90.91007 |
Murabari |
2 |
1 |
|
8 |
N26.69722, E90.92653 |
Sidhajhar |
4 |
0 |
Table
2. Total count of Bengal Florican population.
|
|
Bengal Florican |
Population |
|
1 |
Male |
50 |
|
2 |
Female |
17 |
|
3 |
Additional male sighted in flight |
7 |
|
|
Total |
74 |
Table
3. Male Bengal Florican sightings over the last four decades (Narayan 1992;
Brahma 2013).
|
|
Grassland Block |
1989 |
2011 |
2021 |
|
1 |
Kasindaha |
7 |
NA |
NA |
|
2 |
Mahout Camp Fields |
4 |
NA |
NA |
|
3 |
Palsiguri |
3 |
NA |
NA |
|
4 |
Kuribeel |
6 |
5 |
5 |
|
5 |
Uchila-Bongali Hathdhowa |
1 |
NA |
NA |
|
6 |
Bura Buri Jhar |
1 |
NA |
NA |
|
7 |
Lafasari |
NA |
4 |
NA |
|
8 |
Kapur-pura/ Sidhajhar |
8 |
5 |
4 |
|
9 |
Pohu Field |
NA |
2 |
NA |
|
10 |
Dighlatari |
NA |
4 |
NA |
|
11 |
Agrang |
NA |
4 |
7 |
|
12 |
Kokilabari |
NA |
8 |
20 |
|
13 |
Murabari |
NA |
NA |
2 |
|
14 |
Abiwidora |
NA |
NA |
3 |
|
15 |
Rupahi |
NA |
NA |
7 |
|
16 |
Bhumuk |
NA |
NA |
2 |
|
Total |
|
30 |
32 |
50 |
Table
4. Classification of L7 Satellite imageries of 2000.
|
Class ID |
Class name |
Pixel sum |
Area [km2] |
Percentage [%] |
|
0 |
Mosaic |
3368 |
3.031 |
20.57 |
|
1 |
Grassland |
12960 |
11.664 |
79.17 |
|
2 |
Woodland |
40 |
0.036 |
0.244 |
Table
5. Classification of L8 Satellite imageries of 2020.
|
Class ID |
Class name |
Pixel sum |
Area [km2] |
Percentage [%] |
|
0 |
Mosaic |
7421 |
6.6789 |
45.33 |
|
1 |
Water |
1 |
0.0009 |
0.0061 |
|
2 |
Grassland |
8110 |
7.299 |
49.54 |
|
3 |
Woodland |
836 |
0.7524 |
5.10 |
For
figures & images - - click here for full PDF
REFERENCES
Baral, H.S., T.R. Bhatt, S.R. Giri, A.K. Ram, S.K. Shah, L.P. Poudyal,
D. Chaudhary, G. Bhattacharya & R. Amin (2020). Status of the Critically
Endangered Bengal Florican Houbaropsis bengalensis (Gmelin, 1789) in
Koshi Tappu Wildlife
Reserve, Nepal. Journal of Threatened Taxa 12(9): 16006–16012. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.4832.12.9.16006-16012
Banerjee, S.,
D. Das & R. John (2021). Grassland vegetation and roads have dominant influence on decadal-scale
spatial-temporal patterns of fires in a species-rich protected Terai habitat in northeastern India. Agricultural and
Forest Meteorology 304–305: 108411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108411
BirdLife International (2010). Houbaropsis
bengalensis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened
Species 2010: e. T22692015A29263371.
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/bengal-floricanhoubaropsisbengalensis
on 12/06/2020.
BirdLife International (2022). Houbaropsis
bengalensis. The IUCN Red List of
Threatened Species 2022.
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/bengal-floricanhoubaropsisbengalensis
on 15/03/2023.
Brahma, N.
(2013). Ecological
evaluation of grassland using Bengal florican as indicator species in Manas national park Assam. Ph.D. Thesis, Gauhati University.
Brahma, N.,
K. Choudhury, R.K. Sharma & M. Basumatary (2009). Bengal Florican Conservation and
Research Initiative in BTAD, India. Aaranyak report,
63 pp.
Collar, N.,
H.S. Baral, B. Nyambayar,
B. Gobind, N. Brahma, B. Robert, A. Choudhury, O. Combreau, P. Dolman, P. Donald, S. Dutta, D. Gadhavi, K. Gore, O. Goroshko, C.
Hong, G. Jathar, R. Jha, Y. Jhala,
M. Koshkin & M. Kessler (2017). Averting the extinction of
bustards in Asia. Forktail 33: 1–26.
Das, D., S.
Banerjee & R. John (2019). Predicting the distribution and abundance of invasive
plant species in a sub-tropical woodland-grassland ecosystem in northeastern
India. Plant Ecology 220: 935–950. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-019-00964-7
Das, D., S.
Banerjee, J. Lehmkuhl, J. Krishnaswamy & R. John
(2022). The
influence of abiotic and spatial variables on woody and herbaceous species
abundances in a woodland–grassland system in the Eastern Terai
of India. Journal of Plant Ecology 15(1): 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtab080
Hajra, P.K. & A.K. Baishya (2002). Manas
Biosphere Reserve, pp. 2627–2646. In: Singh, N.P. & K.P. Singh (eds.).
Floristic Diversity and Conservation Strategies in India. Botanical Survey of
India, Calcutta.
Narayan, G.
(1992). Ecology,
distribution and conservation of the Bengal Florican Houbaropsis
begalensis (Gmelin) in
India. PhD thesis, University of Bombay.
Prasai, R., H. Kafley,
S. Upadhaya, S. Thapa, P. Shrestha, A. Dudley &
Y.P. Timilsina (2021). Population status and
distribution of the Critically Endangered Bengal Florican Houbaropsis bengalensis
in the grassland of Koshi Tappu
Wildlife Reserve, Nepal. Journal of Threatened Taxa 13(9): 19293–19301.
https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.6503.13.9.19293-19301
QGIS
Development Team (2020). QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation
Project.
Rahmani, A.R., R.R.S. Jha, N. Khongsai, N. Shinde, R. Talegaonkar & M. Kalra (2017). Studying movement pattern and dispersal of the Bengal
Florican (Houbaropsis bengalensis):
A Satellite Telemetry Pilot Project. Final Report 2013-2016. Bombay Natural
History Society, Mumbai, 157 pp.
Sarma, P., B. Lahkar,
S. Ghosh, A. Rabha, J. Das, N. Nath & N. Brahma (2008). Land-use and land cover change
and future implication analysis in Manas National
Park, India using multi-temporal satellite data. Current Science 95(2):
223–227.
Stohlgren T.J., M.B. Falkner & L.D.
Schell (1995). A modified-whittaker nested vegetation sampling method. Kluwer
Academic Publishers. Printed in Belgium. Vegetation 117: 113–121.