Journal of Threatened Taxa |
www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 July 2023 | 15(7): 23545–23556
ISSN 0974-7907
(Online) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Print)
https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.8203.15.7.23545-23556
#8203 | Received 21
November 2022 | Final received 13 June 2023 | Finally accepted 22 June 2023
A preliminary assessment of
Odonata (dragonflies & damselflies) across an elevation gradient – insights
from Shiwaliks to Alpines, northwestern Himalaya,
India
Neeraj Sharma 1,
Dinesh Singh 2, Shakha Sharma 3 & Ajaz
Ansari 4
1,2 Institute of Mountain
Environment, University of Jammu, Bhaderwah Campus, Bhaderwah, UT of Jammu & Kashmir 182222, India.
3 Government Gandhi Memorial
Science College, Jammu, Jammu, UT of Jammu & Kashmir 180006, India.
4 Department of Environmental
Sciences, University of Jammu, Jammu, UT of Jammu & Kashmir 180006, India.
1 nirazsharma@gmail.com,
2 itzmed12@gmail.com, 3 shakhasharma24@gmail.com
(corresponding author), 4 ajazansari90@gmail.com
Abstract: Understanding the species distribution
and richness along an environmental gradient helps identify hotspots and
prioritize conservation efforts at landscape scale. This is more
effective for the species that are indicators of environmental change,
such as odonates. As the information about the
distribution of this group of insects is scarce in Jammu & Kashmir, their
documentation assumes a greater significance.
Here, we present a checklist of odonate
species from 23 sites across diverse landscapes in subtropical, temperate, and
alpine ecosystems over an elevational gradient of 3,700 m in Jammu division. We
recorded 63 species from 39 genera and 11 families, four Anisoptera
and seven Zygoptera. The most represented families
were Libellulidae (15 genera & 29 species)
and Coenagrionidae (five genera & 10
species). The preliminary surveys resulted in addition of 24 new species to the
Odanata fauna of Jammu & Kashmir, including three
new to the northwestern Himalaya. The study underlines that even opportunistic
records are useful in understanding the distribution range and delineating the
potential habitats of odonates. The study calls for
intensive odonate surveys to better understand their
distribution and ecology in hitherto less explored region in the northwestern
Himalaya.
Keywords: Amphibiotic insects, Anisoptera, Greater Himalaya, mountains, Pir-Panjal, puddles, stream off shoots, summer ditches, Zygoptera
Editor: Pankaj Koparde,
MIT World Peace University, Pune, India. Date
of publication: 26 July 2023 (online & print)
Citation: Sharma, N., D. Singh, S. Sharma & A. Ansari (2023). A preliminary
assessment of Odonata (dragonflies & damselflies) across an elevation
gradient – insights from Shiwaliks to Alpines, northwestern Himalaya, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 15(7):
23545–23556. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.8203.15.7.23545-23556
Copyright: © Sharma et al. 2023. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. JoTT allows
unrestricted use, reproduction, and distribution of this article in any medium
by providing adequate credit to the author(s) and the source of publication.
Funding: The surveys were partly funded by Department of Wildlife Protection, Govt. of Jammu and Kashmir, and
Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Govt. of India.
Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Author details: Neeraj Sharma is an assistant professor in the faculty of life sciences at Institute of Mountain Environment, University of Jammu where he actively engages in research and scientific outreach on various aspects of mountain ecology and biodiversity involving mammals, birds, and insects. Dinesh Singh is a lecturer in the faculty of life sciences, Institute of Mountain Environment (IME), Bhaderwah Campus of University of Jammu. Aside from his interest in alpine vegetation and flora, he has contributed to the exploration of other animal groups in the region, including mammals, birds, odonata, and butterflies. Shakha Sharma is an assistant professor in the department of Zoology, Govt. Gandhi Memorial Sciences College, Jammu. Besides teaching, she has made significant contributions to the lepidopteran diversity of Jammu and Kashmir including several new distributional records and reports on range extension of butterflies in the region. Ajaz Ansari is a
Ph.D scholar currently working on large carnivores in a high altitude protected area in Jammu and Kashmir. He has been instrumental in biodiversity assessment of protected area network in Jammu Shiwaliks and has developed expertise in data analysis and modelling.
Author contributions: NS, SS and DS conducted the field surveys and drafted the manuscript; NS and SS conceptualized, designed, and executed the surveys and wrote the manuscript; AA analysed the data, while SS communicated with the journal.
Acknowledgements: The authors would like to express their
gratitude to Rector, Bhaderwah Campus, University of
Jammu, for his administrative support during the surveys. Department of Wildlife
Protection, Government of the UT of Jammu & Kashmir and Ministry of
Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Govt. of India are thanked for partly
funding the surveys. The authors gratefully appreciate the help rendered by
Asha, Anil, Aasma and Vandana for assisting with
field surveys and Muzaffar A Kichloo for the
preparation of map.
Introduction
The Himalayan Odonata fauna
comprises of 257 species in 112 genera and 18 families with 34 species endemic
to the Himalayas (Subramaniam & Babu 2018).
Though well-documented in the neighbouring states of Himachal Pradesh and
Uttarakhand, the information on the distribution of Odonata in Jammu &
Kashmir is scanty. The earlier accounts of Odonata from Jammu & Kashmir
dates back to the records of Abott (Calvert 1899),
Fraser (1933, 1934, 1936) followed by a few checklists (Singh & Baijal 1954; Asahina 1978; Kumar
& Prasad 1981; Carfi et al. 1983; Kumar 1983; Lahiri & Das 1991; Dar et al. 2002; Mitra
2003). Recently, a few surveys have been conducted to describe the diversity
and distribution of odonates of Jammu & Kashmir
(Subramanian & Babu 2018; Sheikh et al. 2020;
Riyaz & Sivasankaran 2021; Quereshi
et al. 2022; Kumar et al. 2022). Singh (2022) described 65 species from Jammu
& Kashmir based on available literature and the online curated website
Odonata of India (https://www.indianodonata.org/) published until 2022.
Geographically, the union
territory of Jammu & Kashmir comprises two regions, Jammu & Kashmir
characterized by five distinct physiographic units. The Jammu region of Jammu
& Kashmir offers a wide range of habitats from the alluvial plains of the
Ravi and Chenab rivers in the south to the moderately elevated Shiwaliks, Pir-Panjal, and
Greater Himalaya northwards, bordering Kashmir in the north and Ladakh in the north-east. Documenting odonate
fauna from such regions becomes important as it helps fill the knowledge gap
about distribution of species, which may have conservation implications. To
gain a better understanding of the spatial distribution of odonates
in the region, we conducted preliminary surveys in seasonal and perennial water
bodies in parts of alluvial plains, sub-tropics, lesser, and the Greater
Himalaya spanning a vast elevational gradient ranging from 260–3,960 m. The
baseline information obtained on the abundance and distribution of 63 species
of odonates for the region will be useful for
monitoring the health of aquatic ecosystems on spatial and temporal scales.
Methods
We sampled the adult dragonflies
in 23 stations: eleven in the subtropics, nine in temperate, and three in
alpine habitats in Rajouri, Jammu, Udhampur, Kathua, Doda, and Kishtwar districts of
Jammu division in the union territory of Jammu & Kashmir. The subtropical
habitats included the alluvial plains and hills and ridges of Jammu Shiwaliks (250–1,150 m). Characterized by dry climate and
soils with low water retention capacity, most of the sampled habitats included
seasonal ponds, roadside ditches, and streams. The subtemperate and temperate
ecosystems in the lesser Himalayas were scanned for forested perennial
channels, rivulets, and streams in an elevation range of 1,150 to 3,000 m,
while sub alpines and alpines included springs, minor streams, summer ditches,
and swamps (3,200–4,200 m) in parts of the Greater Himalaya bordering the
Zanskar region of Ladakh (Table 1, Image 1). During a
two-year sampling period, we followed an opportunistic sampling strategy and
visited all stations twice during summer to monsoon (end of May to
mid-September) except for the alpines which were too far apart. The individuals
were not counted for abundance and density estimates, however, the frequency of
sightings was taken into account for computing the relative frequency. The odonates were categorized as very common (sighted during
75–100 % of the sampling), common (sighted between 50–75 % times), occasional
(observed between 25–50 %), and rare (sighted below 25% times) following Adarsh
et al. (2014). All the field visits were conducted between 1000 h to 1200 h,
when the adult odonates are most active. The
individual odonates were photographed and identified
to the species level referring to the field guides (Subramanian 2005, 2009;
Kiran & Raju 2013; Singh 2022) and curated online platforms like Odonata of
India website (https://www.indianodonata.org/). No specimens were, however,
collected during the surveys. The species have been enlisted following the
systematic arrangement and taxonomy of Subramanian et al. (2018) and Kalkman et al (2020).
Results
A total of 63 odonates
(40 dragonflies and 23 damselflies) were recorded from the study area. These
belonged to 39 genera and 11 families, four anisopterans
and seven zygopterans (Table 2, Figure 2, Images
1–63). In terms of habitat sharing, 50 species were exclusively found to be
associated with one of the three ecosystems studied, indicating their limited
geographical distribution. The sub-tropical ecosystems harboured high richness
(SR = 46) accounting for 73% of the total, followed by temperate (SR = 28, 43%)
and alpine (SR = 5, 8%). Fourteen species were found to be common across
subtropical and temperate ecosystems, whereas temperate and alpine shared only
two species, Cordulegaster brevistigma and Orthetrum
internum. Families Calopterygidae,
Chlorocyphidae, Chlorocyphidae,
and Platycnemididae were confined to subtropical
habitats, while Gomphidae, Libellulidae,
Coenagrionidae, Euphaeidae,
Lestidae, and Synlestidae
exhibited affinities for both sub-tropical and temperate climate (Figure 3).
The occurrence data (relative
frequency) during the study period shows that 48 species (76%) belonged to
occasional and rare (n = 24, each) category. Eleven species were found common
and four very common. Orthetrum pruinosum, O. triangulare,
and Sympetrum commixtum among the Anisoptera and Amphiallagma
parvum among the Zygoptera were the most commonly
encountered species during the current sampling. In all, 60 species are
classified as ‘Least Concern’ by the IUCN, while three species have not yet
been evaluated for their threat status (Table 2). Families Aeshnidae
and Libellulidae are found in all three climatic
zones, occupying a greater elevational range than other Anisoptera
families (Figure 3). Family Cordulegastridae
comprising a solitary taxon Cordulegaster brevistigma was restricted to temperate and alpine
zones, whilst members of the family Gomphidae were
restricted to subtropical and temperate regions. Most of the Zygoptera families occupied subtropical regions,
although a few extended their range into sub-temperate and temperate zones
(Figure 3).
Twenty-four (10 Anisoptera and 14 Zygoptera)
among the 63 species encountered during the surveys are reported for the first
time in Jammu & Kashmir, including three new to the northwestern Himalaya.
These include Anax indicus, A. nigrolineatus, Anisogomphus
bivittatus, Ictinogomphus
rapax, Brachydiplax
sobrina, Diplacodes
nebulosa, Orthetrum
taeniolatum, Sympetrum speciosum,
Aristocypha trifasciata,
Amphiallagma parvum, Agriocnemis pygmaea,
Pseudagrion decorum, P. hypermelas, P. microcephalum,
P. spencei, Anisopleura
comes, A. lestoides, Bayadera indica, Lestes dorothea, Megalestes major, and Drepanosticta
carmichaeli. Among these Sympetrum speciosum and Aristocypha trifasciata reported by Singh (2022) are based on the
media records of the first author already published in Odonata of India website
(https://www.indianodonata.org/). The newly added Odonata fauna to the
northwestern Himalaya include Davidius davidii, Tramea transmarina, and Calicnemia
imitans (Table 2).
Discussion
The Anisoptera
families Libellulidae (29 species) and Aeshnidae & Gomphidae (5
species, each) accounted for nearly 62% of all species observed during the
current sampling. Four families (Cordulegastridae, Calopterygidae, Lestidae, and Synlestidae) and 24 genera were monotypic indicating their
restricted distribution in the region. Libellulidae
and Gomphidae are well-distributed (Subramanian 2005)
Anisoptera across the Indian subcontinent. The
widespread dispersal and distribution may be attributed to the larger body size
of species in these families (Dalzochio
et al. 2011). The habitat heterogeneity
and varying microclimatic regime sustain a high species richness and diversity
(Cramer & Willig 2005; Storch et al. 2023) among
different groups of animals. High species richness has been recorded from the
small water bodies like rivulets, and streams as they create conducive
microhabitats suitable for their survival as observed by Arunima & Nameer (2021), Chandran & Chandran (2021) Chandran et
al. (2021), and Thakuria & Kalita
(2021) as well. Key conditions for many species include shading around water
bodies, specific vegetation structure for breeding and oviposition or nymphal microhabitat availability (Rantala et al. 2004;
Cheri & Finn 2023). Subtropical ecosystems supported more odonates than temperate and alpine habitats, indicating a
declining trend in species richness with increasing elevation as reported in
other insect groups (Vetaas et al. 2019, Fontana et
al. 2020; Dewan et al. 2022). No damselfly was found above 2,200 m in the
current sampling effort (Figure 3). This does not, however, elude their
presence in sub-alpine and alpine climate zones, as these landscapes were not
visited as frequently as subtropical and temperate ones were.
Singh (2022) described 184 odonate species from north-western region of India,
including 65 from the Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir. During their
explorations in selected localities of the Jammu division, Kumar et al. (2022)
observed 32 odonate species, 25 of which are new
to Jammu & Kashmir. This communication adds 24 more species to odonate fauna of Jammu & Kashmir, including three
new to the northwestern Himalaya. This trend may be explained by the fact that
the area has been less explored for Odonata. Recent studies conducted in the
Himalaya reveals that Odonata fauna of the region is threatened due to habitat
destruction, agricultural expansion, pesticides, tourism, urban and industrial
pollution (Subramanian & Babu 2018; De et al.
2021) and this holds true for the study area.
Aquatic ecosystems are spatially and temporally constrained (De et al.
2021), and the sites of current explorations are found in close proximity to
human settlements, roads and highways making them vulnerable to management
activities that threaten the existence of aquatic biodiversity including odonates. Most roadside ditches are being destroyed by road
expansions, ponds are being encroached upon for land reclamation, and rivers
and streams are being exposed to sand extraction and increased pollutant loads.
In terms of the occurrence data,
48 species belonged to occasional and rare categories. Arunima & Nameer (2021) in their observations recorded a moderately
high number of occasional and rare species. Interestingly, all taxa found
during the sampling figure in the least concern category of conservation (IUCN
2023) indicating a stable worldwide population. The study though preliminary
with limited area coverage and ecological scope has unveiled vital information
regarding the distribution of the observed odonate
species in the heterogenous landscapes of northwestern Himalaya. Though the
current observations on the Odonata do not necessarily provide a complete
checklist for the region, they do add to the knowledge of the insect fauna of
the Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir. More systematic research on odonate assemblages and seasonality is needed to describe the
ecology and biomonitoring of their habitats in the region as macroinvertebrates
are standard bioindicators of freshwater ecosystems (Barbour et al. 1999).
Table 1. Spatial attributes of
sampling locations, including geomorphological features and the degree of
disturbance.
Climate zones |
Sampling sites / District |
Geo co-ordinates * |
Elevation (in m) * |
Habitat description |
Disturbance |
Subtropical zone |
1.Gharana and associated
wetlands in agricultural landscape, Jammu |
32.540oN, 74.690o E |
260 |
A vast agriculture landscape
comprised of a protected wetland, marshlands, ditches, channels, and paddy
fields |
High |
2.GGM Science College, Jammu |
32.724o N, 74.851o E |
302 |
Botanical Garden and college
lawns |
Moderate |
|
3. Kathua
town, Kathua |
32.367 o N, 75.525 o E |
318 |
Urban drain dissecting the twon |
High |
|
4.Trikutanagar, Jammu |
32.685o N, 74.879o E |
320 |
Urban storm water drain |
High |
|
5. Nowshera, Rajouri |
33.149 o N, 74.234 o E |
543 |
Urban drain at the confluence
with a perennial stream |
High |
|
6. Jasrota
WLS / Ujh Barrage, Kathua |
32.474o N, 75.417o E |
382 |
A lacustrine ecosystem
surrounded with plantations, farmlands and habitations. |
Low |
|
7. Thein Conservation Reserve, Kathua |
32.446o N, 75.721o E |
518 |
A terrestrial protected area
bounded by a reservoir eastward. |
Low |
|
8. Surinsar,
Jammu |
32.770o N, 75.041o E |
605 |
Medium sized lake, seasonal
ponds and channels |
Moderate |
|
9. Battal,
Udhampur |
32.672o N, 75.264o E |
630 |
Streams, roadside water
channels and ditches |
Low |
|
10. Mansar,
Udhampur |
32.696o N, 75.145o E |
662 |
Large water body, ponds, and
ditches |
Moderate |
|
11. Samroli,
Udhampur |
33.002o N, 75.206o E |
845 |
Seasonal and perennial streams,
ditches, and roadside drains |
Moderate |
|
Subtemperate / Temperate zone |
12. Pranoo,
Doda |
33.097o N, 75.580o E |
1210 |
Neeru stream, main
channel |
Low |
13. Bhalla, Doda |
33.068o N, 75.613o E |
1270 |
Neeru stream and
tributaries |
Low |
|
14. Khellani,
Doda |
33.132o N, 75.500o E |
1350 |
Streams, roadside water
channels, and springs |
Low |
|
15. Batote,
Doda |
33.106o N, 75.341o E |
1430 |
Roadside springs, water
channels and rivulets |
Moderate |
|
16. Phalni,
Rajouri |
33.361oN, 74.621o E |
1440 |
A fish farm housing Indian
Major Carps adjacent to trout raceways of state fisheries department. |
Low |
|
17. Bhaderwah,
Doda |
32.969o N, 75.718o E |
1714 |
Springs, water channels and
ditches in Bhaderwah Campus, seasonal channels |
Low |
|
18. Kundail,
Kishtwar |
33.331o N, 76.204o E |
2075 |
Bhot stream and springs |
Low |
|
19. Thanthera,
Doda |
32.918o N, 75.723o E |
2155 |
Basti stream and roadside
springs |
Low |
|
20. Chasoti,
Kishtwar |
33.374o N, 76.275o E |
2356 |
A typical mountain village with
terrace farmlands |
Low |
|
Subalpine / Alpine zone |
21. Suncham,
Kishtwar |
32.429o N, 76.410o E |
3260 |
Bhot stream, its
tributary Hagshu, springs and channels. |
Low |
22. Tun,
Kishtwar |
33.208o N, 76.396o E |
3345 |
Sansari stream, seasonal
ditches, and springs |
Low |
|
23. Kailash Lake, Doda |
32.871o N, 75.699o E |
3960 |
Natural springs and rivulets |
Low |
Table 2. Checklist of odonates in the three distinct ecosystems in Jammu division
of Jammu & Kashmir depicting distribution, relative frequency and threat
status.
|
Suborder / Family / Species |
Distribution |
Relative frequency |
IUCN Red List status |
Image number |
|||
ST |
TM |
AL |
||||||
Suborder : Anisoptera
(Dragonflies) |
||||||||
Family : Aeshnidae
|
||||||||
1. |
Aeshna juncea (Bartenef, 1929) |
- |
- |
+ |
RA |
LC |
1 |
|
2. |
Anax immaculifrons (Rambur, 1842) |
+ |
- |
- |
OC |
LC |
2 |
|
3. |
Anax indicus (Lieftinck, 1942)* |
+ |
- |
- |
RA |
LC |
3 |
|
4. |
Anax nigrolineatus (Fraser, 1935)* |
- |
+ |
- |
OC |
LC |
4 |
|
5. |
Anax parthenope (Selys, 1839) |
- |
+ |
- |
RA |
LC |
5 |
|
Family : Cordulegastridae |
||||||||
6. |
Cordulegaster brevistigma (Selys, 1854) |
- |
+ |
+ |
OC |
LC |
6 |
|
Family : Gomphidae |
||||||||
7. |
Anisogomphus bivittatus (Selys, 1854)* |
- |
+ |
- |
OC |
LC |
7 |
|
8. |
Davidius davidii (Selys, 1878)** |
- |
+ |
- |
RA |
LC |
8 |
|
9. |
Ictinogomphus rapax (Rambur, 1842)* |
+ |
- |
- |
OC |
LC |
9 |
|
10. |
Ophiogomphus reductus (Calvert, 1898) |
- |
+ |
- |
OC |
LC |
10 |
|
11. |
Paragomphus lineatus (Selys, 1850) |
+ |
+ |
- |
OC |
LC |
11 |
|
Family : Libellulidae |
||||||||
12 |
Acisoma panorpoides (Rambur, 1842)
|
+ |
- |
- |
RA |
LC |
12 |
|
13 |
Brachythemis contaminata (Fabricius, 1793) |
+ |
- |
- |
OC |
LC |
13 |
|
14 |
Brachydiplax sobrina (Rambur, 1842)* |
+ |
- |
- |
RA |
LC |
14 |
|
15 |
Bradinopyga geminata (Rambur, 1842) |
+ |
- |
- |
OC |
LC |
15 |
|
16 |
Crocothemis erythraea (Brullé, 1832) |
+ |
- |
- |
OC |
LC |
16 |
|
17 |
Crocothemis servilia (Drury, 1770) |
+ |
+ |
- |
CO |
LC |
17 |
|
18 |
Diplacodes lefebvrii (Rambur, 1842) |
+ |
- |
- |
OC |
LC |
18 |
|
19 |
Diplacodes nebulosa (Fabricius, 1793)* |
+ |
- |
- |
RA |
LC |
19 |
|
20 |
Libellula quadrimaculata (Linnaeus, 1758) |
- |
+ |
- |
RA |
LC |
20 |
|
21 |
Neurothemis tullia (Drury, 1773) |
+ |
- |
- |
RA |
LC |
21 |
|
22 |
Orthetrum cancellatum (Linnaeus, 1758) |
- |
+ |
- |
RA |
LC |
22 |
|
23 |
Orthetrum glaucum (Brauer, 1865) |
- |
+ |
- |
OC |
LC |
23 |
|
24 |
Orthetrum internum (McLachlan, 1894) |
- |
+ |
+ |
CO |
NE |
24 |
|
25 |
Orthetrum luzonicum (Brauer, 1868) |
- |
+ |
- |
CO |
LC |
25 |
|
26 |
Orthetrum pruinosum (Burmeister, 1839) |
+ |
+ |
- |
VC |
LC |
26 |
|
27 |
Orthetrum sabina (Drury, 1770) |
+ |
- |
- |
CO |
LC |
27 |
|
28 |
Orthetrum taeniolatum (Schneider, 1845)* |
+ |
- |
- |
RA |
LC |
28 |
|
29 |
Orthetrum triangulare (Selys, 1878) |
+ |
+ |
- |
VC |
LC |
29 |
|
30 |
Palpopleura sexmaculata (Fabricius, 1787) |
+ |
+ |
- |
CO |
LC |
30 |
|
31 |
Pantala flavescens (Fabricius, 1798) |
+ |
- |
- |
OC |
LC |
31 |
|
32 |
Rhyothemis triangularis (Kirby, 1889) |
+ |
- |
- |
RA |
LC |
32 |
|
33 |
Rhyothemis variegata (Linnaeus, 1763) |
+ |
- |
- |
OC |
LC |
33 |
|
34 |
Sympetrum commixtum (Selys, 1884) |
- |
- |
+ |
VC |
LC |
34 |
|
35 |
Sympetrum fonscolombii
(Selys, 1840) |
- |
+ |
- |
RA |
LC |
35 |
|
36 |
Sympetrum speciosum
(Oguma,
1915)* |
- |
- |
+ |
CO |
NE |
36 |
|
37 |
Tramea transmarina (Selys, 1878)** |
- |
+ |
- |
OC |
LC |
37 |
|
38 |
Tramea virginia (Rambur, 1842) |
+ |
+ |
- |
OC |
LC |
38 |
|
39 |
Trithemis aurora (Burmeister, 1839) |
+ |
- |
- |
OC |
LC |
39 |
|
40 |
Trithemis festiva (Rambur, 1842) |
+ |
+ |
- |
CO |
LC |
40 |
|
Suborder : Zygoptera
(Damselflies) |
||||||||
Family : Calopterygidae
|
||||||||
41 |
Neurobasis chinensis (Linnaeus, 1758) |
+ |
- |
- |
RA |
LC |
41 |
|
Family : Chlorocyphidae |
||||||||
42 |
Aristocypha trifasciata (Selys, 1853)* |
+ |
- |
- |
OC |
LC |
42 |
|
43 |
Aristocypha quadrimaculata (Selys,
1853) |
+ |
- |
- |
CO |
LC |
43 |
|
44 |
Paracypha unimaculata (Selys, 1853) |
+ |
- |
- |
RA |
LC |
44 |
|
45 |
Libellago lineata (Burmeister, 1839) |
+ |
- |
- |
OC |
LC |
45 |
|
Family : Coenagrionidae |
||||||||
46 |
Amphiallagma parvum (Selys, 1876)* |
+ |
+ |
- |
VC |
LC |
46 |
|
47 |
Agriocnemis pygmaea (Rambur, 1842)* |
+ |
- |
- |
RA |
LC |
47 |
|
48 |
Ceriagrion coromandelianum (Fabricius,
1798) |
+ |
- |
- |
CO |
LC |
48 |
|
49 |
Ischnura forcipata (Morton, 1907) |
+ |
+ |
- |
CO |
LC |
49 |
|
50 |
Ischnura rubilio (Selys, 1876) |
+ |
+ |
- |
OC |
NE |
50 |
|
51 |
Pseudagrion decorum (Rambur, 1842)* |
+ |
- |
- |
RA |
LC |
51 |
|
52 |
Pseudagrion hypermelas (Selys, 1876)* |
+ |
- |
- |
RA |
LC |
52 |
|
53 |
Pseudagrion microcephalum (Rambur, 1842)* |
+ |
- |
- |
RA |
LC |
53 |
|
54 |
Pseudagrion rubriceps (Selys, 1876) |
+ |
+ |
- |
OC |
LC |
54 |
|
55 |
Pseudagrion spencei (Fraser, 1922)* |
+ |
- |
- |
OC |
LC |
55 |
|
Family : Euphaeidae |
||||||||
56 |
Anisopleura comes (Hagen,1880)* |
+ |
+ |
- |
RA |
LC |
56 |
|
57 |
Anisopleura lestoides (Selys,1853)* |
- |
+ |
- |
OC |
LC |
57 |
|
58 |
Bayadera indica (Selys, 1853)* |
+ |
- |
- |
RA |
LC |
58 |
|
Family : Lestidae
|
||||||||
59 |
Lestes dorothea (Fraser, 1924)*
|
+ |
+ |
- |
OC |
LC |
59 |
|
Family : Synlestidae |
||||||||
60 |
Megalestes major (Selys, 1862)* |
+ |
+ |
- |
CO |
LC |
60 |
|
Family : Platycnemididae |
||||||||
61 |
Calicnemia imitans (Lieftinck, 1948)** |
+ |
- |
- |
RA |
LC |
61 |
|
62 |
Copera marginipes (Rambur, 1842) |
+ |
- |
- |
RA |
LC |
62 |
|
63 |
Drepanosticta carmichaeli (Laidlaw, 1915)* |
+ |
- |
- |
RA |
LC |
63 |
|
+—presence | -—absence |
ST—Sub-tropical | TM—Subtemperate / Temperate zone | AL—Alpine zone |
OC—Occasional | CO—Common | VC—Very
Common | RA—Rare | LC—Least Concern | NE—Not Evaluated | *—Addition to the
Odonata fauna of Jammu & Kashmir | **—Addition to the Odonata fauna of
northwestern Himalaya, India.
For
figures & images - - click here for full PDF
References
Adarsh, C.K.,
K.S. Aneesh & P.O. Nameer (2014). A preliminary checklist of odonates in Kerala Agricultural University (KAU) campus,
Thrissur District, Kerala, southern India. Journal of Threatened Taxa
6(8): 6127–6137. https://doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.o3491.6127-37
Arunima, J.
& P.O. Nameer (2021). A preliminary checklist of
dragonflies and damselflies (Insecta: Odonata) of Vakkom Grama Panchayath, Thiruvanthapuram District, Kerala, India. Journal of
Threatened Taxa 13(8): 19125–19136. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.7311.13.8.19125-19136
Asahina, S. (1978). A new and some known species of odonata from Kashmir (Insecta), Senckenbergian Biology 59 : 115–120.
Barbour,
M.T., J. Gerritsen, B.D. Snyder & J.B. Stribling (1999).
Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable
Rivers: Periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates, and fish, 2nd ed.; U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water: Washington, DC,USA.
Cramer, M.J.
& M.R. Willig (2005). Habitat heterogeneity, species
diversity and null models. Oikos 108(2): 209–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.12944.x
Calvert, P.P.
(1899). Odonata
(dragonflies) from the Indian Ocean, and from Kashmir, collected by Dr. W.L. Abott, pp. 141–154. In: Proceedings of the Academy of
Natural Sciences of Philadephia.
Carfi, S., C.P. Del & F. Terzani (1983). Odonata captured in Jammu and
Kashmir Himachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh India, Giornale
Italiano di Entomologia
1(5): 261–264.
Chandran, R. & A.V. Chandran
(2021). Dragonflies and damselflies (Insecta: Odonata) of Aryanad Grama Panchayat,
Kerala, India. Journal of Threatened
Taxa 13(14): 20153–20166. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.7342.13.14.20153-20166
Chandran, A.V., S.K. Jose & S.V. Gopalan (2021). Dragonflies and damselflies (Insecta: Odonata) of the Kole Wetlands, Central Kerala, India. Journal
of Threatened Taxa 13(3): 17963–17971. https://doi.
org/10.11609/jott.5885.13.3.17963-17971
Cheri, C.R. & D.S. Finn (2023). Odonata
as Indicators? Dragonflies
and Damselflies Respond to Riparian Conditions along Ozark Spring Streams. Hydrobiology 2: 260–276. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrobiology2010017
Dar, G.A., R.C. Bhagat & M.A. Khan (2002). Biodiversity
of the Kashmir Himalaya. Valley
Book House, Srinagar, India, 399 pp.
Dalzochio, M.S., J.M. Costa & M.A. Uchôa (2011). Diversity of Odonata (Insecta) in lotic systems from
Serra da Bodoquena, Mato Grosso do Sul State, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 55(1):
88–94.
De, K., S.
Bhatt, A.P. Singh, M. Uniyal & V.P. Uniyal (2021). Checklist of Odonata (Insecta) of Doon Valley, Uttarakhand, India. Journal of Threatened
Taxa 13(14): 20167–20173. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.7518.13.14.20167-20173
Dewan, S., J.N. Sanders & B.K. Acharya
(2022). Turnover in butterfly communities and traits along an elevational gradient in
the Eastern Himalaya, India.
Ecosphere 13(3): e3984. https://
doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3984
Fontana, V., E. Guariento, A. Hilpold, G. Niedrist, M. Steinwandter, D. Spitale, J. Nascimbene, U. Tappeiner & J. Seeber (2020). Species richness and beta diversity
patterns of multiple taxa along an elevational gradient in pastured grasslands in the European Alps. Scientific Reports 10: 1–11.
Fraser, F.
(1933). The Fauna of British India, Including Ceylon and Burma, Odonata Volume-I. Taylor
and Francis Ltd., London.
Fraser, F.
(1934). The Fauna of British India, Including Ceylon and Burma, Odonata Volume-II. Taylor
and Francis Ltd., London.
Fraser, F.
(1936). The Fauna of British India, Including Ceylon and Burma, Odonata Volume-III. Taylor
and Francis Ltd., London.
IUCN (2023). International Union for
Conservation of Nature. https://www.iucnredlist.org. Assessed
on 12 January 2023.
Kalkman, V.J., R. Babu,
M. Bedjanič, K. Conniff,
T. Gyeltshen, M.K. Khan, K.A. Subramanian,
A. Zia & A.G. Orr (2020). Checklist of the dragonflies
and damselflies (Insecta: Odonata) of Bangladesh, Bhutan, India,
Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. Zootaxa
4849(1): 001–084. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4849.1.1
Kiran, C.G.
& D.V. Raju (2013). Dragonflies
and Damselflies of Kerala (Keralathile
Thumbikal). Tropical Institute of Ecological Sciences, 156 pp.
Kumar, A.
(1983). An annotated list of odonatan from the Jammu region (Western Himalaya, Jammu & Kashmir),
India. Fraseria 4:
15–16.
Kumar, A.M.
& M. Prasad (1981). Field ecology, zoogeography
and taxonomy of the Odonata
of western Himalaya, India, Records of the Zoological Survey of India, Occasional Paper No. 20: 1–118.
Kumar, K., A.P.
Singh & R. Singh (2022). The Diversity of Odonata
(Insecta) in Selected Localities of Jammu and Kashmir. Indian Forester 148(5): 547–551. https://doi.org/10.36808/if/2022/v148i5/156920
Lahiri, A.R. & S. Das (1991). Observation on the epicranio-orbital complex of some Indian Aeshninae (Odonata: Aeshnidae). Records
of the Zoological Survey of India 89(1–4): 155–166.
Mitra, T.R. (2003). Ecology and biogeography of
Odonata with special reference to Indian Fauna, Records of the Zoological
Survey of India, Occasional Paper No. 202. 41 pp.
Qureshi,
A.A., N.A. Paray, R.M. Khandi,
S. Syeed & R.A. Ganai
(2022). Diversity of
Odonata of District Pulwama of Kashmir. Indian
Journal of Entomology e21116. https://doi.org/10.55446/IJE.2021.131.
Rantala,
M.J., J. Ilmonen, J. Koskimäki,
J. Suhonen & K. Tynkkynen
(2004). The
macrophyte, Stratiotes aloides, protects larvae of
dragonfly Aeshna viridis
against fish predation. Aquatic Ecology 38: 77–82.
Riyaz, M.
& K. Sivasankaran (2021). A Preliminary survey of
Dragonflies and Damselflies (Insecta: Odonata) in and
around Hirpora Wildlife Sanctuary Shopian,
Kashmir. Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences 14(1):
133–139. https://doi.org/10.21608/EAJBSA.2021.157352
Sheikh, A.H.,
M.A. Lone & M.A. Wani (2020). New distributional records of
dragonflies (Libellulidae: Anisoptera:
Odonata) from Rajouri district of Jammu and Kashmir. Journal
of the Entomological Research Society 44(1): 121–124.
Singh, S.
& H.N. Bajjal (1954). Entomological Survey of the
Himalayas II- on a collection of Odonata. Agra University Journal of
Research (Science) 3: 385–400.
Singh, D.
(2022). Field
Guide to the Dragonflies and Damselflies of North west India. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh,
Dehradun, 518 pp.
Storch, F.,
S. Boch, M.M. Gossner, H. Feldhaar, C. Ammer, P. Schall, A. Polle, F. Kroiher, J. Müller & J. Bauhus
(2023). Linking
structure and species richness to support forest biodiversity monitoring at
large scales. Annals of Forest Science 80: 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13595-022-01169-1
Subramanian,
K.A. (2005). Dragonflies
and Damselflies of Peninsular India - A Field Guide. Gadgil,
M. (ed.). The Project Lifescape Series. Indian
Academy of Sciences, Bangalore, India, 118 pp.
Subramaniam,
K.A. (2009). Dragonflies
of India: A Field Guide. Vigyan Prasar, Noida, 168 pp.
Subramanian, K.A. & R. Babu
(2018). Insecta: Odonata, pp. 227–240. In: Chandra, K., D. Gupta, K.C. Gopi, B. Tripathy & V. Kumar
(eds.). Faunal Diversity of Indian Himalaya.
Zoological Survey of India,
Kolkata, 872 pp.
Subramanian, K.A., K.G. Emiliyamma,
R. Babu, C. Radhakrishnan
& S.S. Talmale (2018). Atlas of Odonata
(Insecta) of the Western Ghats, India.
Zoological Survey of India,
Kolkata, 417 pp.
Thakuria, D. & J. Kalita
(2021). Diversity and distribution of odonates in Rani Reserve
Forest, Assam, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 13(1): 17487–17503. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.5964.13.1.17487-17503
Vetaas, O.R., K.P. Paudel
& M.Christensen (2019). Principal factors
controlling biodiversity along an elevation gradient:
water, energy and their
interaction. Journal of Biogeography 46:
1652–1663.