Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 January 2023 | 15(1): 22355–22363

 

 

ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) 

https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.8018.15.1.22355-22363

#8018 | Received 16 May 2022 | Final received 25 October 2022 | Finally accepted 18 November 2022

 

 

 

Asiatic Black Bear Ursus thibetanus attacks in Kashmir Valley, India

 

Aaliya Mir 1, Shanmugavelu Swaminathan 2, Rashid Y. Naqash 3, Thomas Sharp 4 & Attur Shanmugam Arun 5

 

1 Wildlife SOS, D-210 Defence Colony, New Delhi 110024, India.

2,5 Wildlife SOS, Bannerghatta Bear Rescue and Rehab Centre, Bangalore, Karnataka 560083, India.

3 Department of Wildlife Protection, Near Hotel Lalit Grand, Boulevard Road, Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir, India.

1,4 Wildlife SOS, 406 East 300 South, No. 302, Salt Lake City, Utah 84111, USA.

1 aaliya@wildlifesos.org, 2 swaminathan@wildlifesos.org, 3 hangulnaqash@yahoo.com,

4 thomas@wildlifesos.org (corresponding author), 5 arun@wildlifesos.org

 

 

 

Editor: Priya Davidar, Sigure Nature Trust, Nilgiris, India.           Date of publication: 26 January 2023 (online & print)

 

Citation: Mir, A., S. Swaminathan, R.Y. Naqash, T. Sharp & A.S. Arun (2023). Asiatic Black Bear Ursus thibetanus attacks in Kashmir Valley, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 15(1): 22355–22363. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.8018.15.1.22355-22363

 

Copyright: © Mir et al. 2023. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.  JoTT allows unrestricted use, reproduction, and distribution of this article in any medium by providing adequate credit to the author(s) and the source of publication.

 

Funding: Wildlife SOS.

 

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

 

Author details: Aaliya Mir, project manager and education officer, works to mitigate human-wildlife interactions through research, education and wildlife rescue. She works on Asiatic Black Bears, Brown Bears, Levantine Vipers, and other species.  She encourages the younger generation to view wildlife in a positive light and become guardians of their natural heritage.  Shanmugavelu Swaminathan, head, wildlife biologist, is involved as a key researcher of the Sloth Bear ecology and the denning project which was initiated by Wildlife SOS in 2014 in the state of Karnataka. The project focused on an in-depth research study of the ecology, denning pattern, and Human-Sloth Bear interactions in the state. He is a member of the IUCN SSC Bear Specialist Group (BSG) for Sloth Bears.  Rashid Naqash, head of unit, is a post graduate in the Wildlife Sciences. He has the distinction of working in all three regions of Jammu & Kashmir. His work focuses on the protection, propagation, and management of the varied wildlife in and outside of protected areas in the region.  Thomas Robert Sharp, The director of conservation and research also serves as the co-chair of the IUCN’s Sloth Bear Expert Team which falls under Bear Specialty Group (BSG). He has been studying Asian bear species for the last 15 years and continues to study the ecology of bears as well as other megafauna.  Dr Attur Shanmugam Arun, director – research & veterinary operations, is involved in various rescue & rehabilitation of treated, displaced, and injured wildlife. He completed his PhD in Biotechnology and carried out research on metagenomic profiling of gut microbes of Sloth Bears and Indian Leopards. He is a member of the IUCN SSC Bear Specialist Group (BSG) for Sloth Bears. 

 

Author contributions: Aaliya Mir—1) project leader, 2) project coordination, 3) writing and analysis. Shanmugavelu Swaminathan—1) writing and analysis. 2) insights to bear activity Raashid Y. Naqash—1) data collection, 2) analysis and insights, Thomas Robert Sharp—1) writing and analysis, 2) background research on Asiatic Black Bear attacks 3) arrangement of manuscript to JoTT. Attur Shanmugam Arun—1) writing and analysis.

 

Acknowledgements: The authors would like to express our sincere thanks to Suresh Kumar Gupta, chief wildlife warden, J&K for giving us permission to analyze the human-bear conflict data of the Kashmir Region. Special thanks are also due to Mr. Rouf Zargar, wildlife warden, South Division, Mr. Intesar Suhail, wildlife warden, Shopian Division, Mr. Mohammad Maqbool Baba, wildlife warden, North Division, Ms. Ifshan Dewan, wildlife warden, Wetland Division, and Mr. Altaf Ahmed, wildlife warden, Central Division for their support and guidance. We would also like to thank the co-founders of Wildlife SOS, Kartick Satyanarayana and Geeta Seshamani without whom this manuscript would not be possible. Finally, we would like to thank Dr. Shabir Mir for his help and support throughout the process of our work.

 

 

 

Abstract: Asiatic Black Bear attacks are reported rarely throughout the majority of their global range; however, this has not been the case in the Kashmir Valley where over the past 20–30 years attacks have been relatively common. There are several causes for the high number of attacks, though the foremost reason likely stems from the conversion of natural habitat to orchards and agricultural fields. Asiatic Black Bears actively crop raid orchards and agricultural areas putting them into close proximity to humans. The Jammu & Kashmir Wildlife Protection Department has collected data on 2,357 Asiatic Black Bear attacks in the Kashmir Valley between 2000 and 2020. A total of 2,243 (95.2%) resulted in injury and 114 (4.8%) resulted in death.  The majority of injuries were reported as minor (57.4%, n=1126), 42.4% (n=832) as grievous, and 1.2% (n=21) caused permanent disability. The highest proportion of attacks occurred from July through November, coinciding with the harvesting season, and the least occurred from December through March, coinciding with when most Asiatic Black Bears are hibernating. Victims of bear attacks were most often working in farms or orchards, and were mostly between the ages of 31–40 years old. Most attacks occurred in the morning hours when people first entered the orchards or agricultural fields to work. The frequency of attacks has declined since 2016, which could be attributed to retaliation killings, better management by the wildlife department, and the engagement of NGO’s with local people to create bear awareness and teach safety measures.

 

Keywords: Bear attacks, bear awareness, crop-raiding, hibernation, Jammu & Kashmir, retaliation-killing, victims, wildlife-conflict, Wildlife Protection Department.

 

 

Introduction

 

Asiatic Black Bears Ursus thibetanus though generally cryptic and shy, are involved in crop raiding and to a lesser extent attacks on humans (Chauhan 2003; Ali et al. 2018; Jamtsho & Wangchuck 2018; Image 1).  Attacks are rare throughout much of their global range which encompasses 18 different countries (Garshelis & Steinmetz 2020), however, this is not the case in India’s Kashmir Valley where they are relatively common (Chauhan 2003; Choudhury et al. 2008; Tak et al. 2009; Rasool et al. 2010). Bear attacks in the Kashmir Valley have increased in the last 20–30 years, possibly due to (1) expansion of agricultural practices such as fruit and nut orchards (that are particularly attractive to bears), (2) the lack of fire-arms among farmers, (3) the India-Pakistan border fencing blocking predator movement, continued human encroachment into wild habitat, and (4) a new generation of people not familiar with coexisting with large predators (Choudhury et al. 2008). Installations by security forces may also fragment the habitat and divert the bears into human dominated areas causing human-bear conflicts.

The Asiatic Black Bear is listed as ‘Vulnerable’ on the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List of Threatened Species due to habitat loss and the commercial trade for live bears and bear parts (Garshelis & Steinmetz 2020). They are also listed as an Appendix I species under CITES and a Schedule I species in India under the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972. There are few published accounts, or long-term data collections, of Asiatic Black Bear attacks. The majority of scientific literature on the topic are from locations with a relatively healthy number of black bears, namely India, Bhutan, and Japan. Often these accounts are listed alongside crop raiding and livestock depredation (Chauhan 2003; Charoo et al. 2011; Sanwal & Lone 2012; Ali et al. 2018; Zahoor et al. 2020). There is still a great deal that is not understood about Asiatic Black Bear attacks. However, most reported attacks are due to surprise encounters that occur in either the woods or in agricultural areas (Tak et al. 2009; Rasool et al. 2010; Akiyama et al. 2017; Penjor & Dorji 2020). As would be expected, the vast majority of attacks appear to be defensive, however, there have been a few accounts that appear to be more predatory (Yamazaki 2017).

Over the past 20 years, the Kashmir Valley has become a hotspot of Human-Asiatic Black Bear conflicts. This paper chronicles the number of Asiatic Black Bear attacks that occurred in the Kashmir Valley between the years of 2000 and 2020. It also looks at the trends and attempts to discern the causes.

 

Study Area

The Kashmir Valley is roughly 15,500 km2 in size (about 140 km by 32 km) and is located between 32° & 34°N and 74° & 75°E (Figure 1). The average elevation is roughly 1,850 m.  The valley is partially surrounded to the north by the Himalayan and Pir Panjal ranges, which have an average elevation  of roughly 3,050 m. The climate is mild with precipitation occurring throughout the year, though spring is the wettest season. Summer is usually mild and fairly dry, but the relative humidity is generally high and the nights are cool. July is the warmest month with temperatures averaging around 24.4°C, and January is the coldest with average temperatures around 2.7°C. The biggest river in the valley is the Jhelum. Oak- Rhododendron forests (Image 2), cover the valleys and Blue Pine Pinus excelsa covers the slopes.

 

 

Methods

 

Asiatic Black Bear attack data was collected by the Jammu & Kashmir Wildlife Protection Department, Kashmir Region, which was established in 1978 and is equivalent to the wildlife wing of the state forest departments in other states. There are five divisions, namely the Central, South, North, Wetland and Shopian, which maintain data on human-bear conflicts for the purpose of paying compensation for bear attacks. These efforts were intensified and payment augmented after 2013. We used this data to assess bear attack patterns over time. Ex gratia rates prior to and after 2014 are given in Table 1. The processing of a case starts with the filing of a police and medical report which is produced to the block level officer of the wildlife department who subsequently forwards it to the higher offices which includes the range officer, wildlife warden, regional wildlife warden, and finally to the chief wildlife warden. The ex gratia application goes through a lot of scrutiny during processing.

 

Results

 

Attacks and Deaths by Year

A total of 2,357 bear attacks were reported in the Kashmir Valley between 2000 and 2020, of which 2,243 (95.2%) resulted in injury and 114 (4.8%) in death (Table 2). The Wildlife Protection Department did not have the resources prior to 2006 to collect detailed bear attack data, and therefore bear attacks prior to 2006 are likely underrepresented in the data set. The maximum number of reported attacks in a single year was 282 in 2010 and included 10 deaths. The number of reported attacks and deaths started diminishing in 2016, and by 2020 the number of attacks was down to 49 with four deaths (Figure 2).

 

Differences Between Districts

The majority of attacks occurred in the South and North divisions. These two divisions are the largest and have the most forest coverage. Additionally, these divisions are undergoing rapid deforestation and urbanization. The Wetland and Shopian divisions used to be part of the North and South divisions, respectively. The Wetland Division does not consist of much prime bear habitat and this results in fewer attacks. The Central Division, which includes Dachigam National Park, has excellent bear habitat. However, the wildlife department in this division is well funded and equipped to deal with human-wildlife interactions and therefore are able to keep bear attacks in check despite the large bear population.

 

Injuries

The exact type of injuries sustained by the victims were not readily available, however, we were able to classify the injuries in three categories based on reports and the amount of ex gratia paid. The three categories are minor, grievous, and permanent disability. Injuries were considered minor if the victim was treated at a local hospital and did not need to stay in the hospital for more than a day for the treatment (Image 3). Injuries were considered grievous if the victim needed to be referred for special treatment, usually to a specialty hospital, where they can undergo specialized procedures and stay for an extended period (Image 4). Finally, permanent disability when the victims were  permanently incapacitated. Overall, the majority of injuries were reported as minor (57.4%, n=1126), 42.4% (n=832) as Grievous, and 1.2% (n=21) resulted in permanent disability.

 

Attacks by Month

A total of 1,449 attacks were documented by month (Figure 3). August (n=309, 21.3% of the total attacks) had the most attacks, followed by September (n=203, 14%), October (n=198, 13.7%), and July (n=182, 12.6%). The least number of attacks took place in the month of January (n=26, 1.8%), February (n=32, 2.2%), December (n=44, 3.0%), and March (n=45, 3.1%). 

 

Attacks by Time of Day

A total of 410 attacks were documented by the time of day in which they occurred (Figure 4). The highest number of attacks occurred between the hours of 0901–1000 h (n=75, 18%), and 218 attacks (53%) took place between 0801–1200 h.

 

Age of People Attacked

A total of 482 attacks were documented by the age of the victims (Figure 5); 226 of the victims (47%) were between 31 and 50 years of age.

 

Activity of People Attacked

The activity of 277 people attacked in the Shopian Division between 2010 and 2019 was documented. People working in, or walking to, fields or orchards made up 176 (63.5%) of the attacks. The second largest group of people attacked were made up of shepherds & herders, and accounted for 33 (11.9%) attacks. People walking to areas not necessarily related to fields or orchards (n=23, 8.3%) and people near & around their homes (n=22, 7.9%) also made up relatively high percentages, though many of these people were working in their vegetable gardens. Other activities made up the remainder of the attacks (n=23, 8.3%).

 

 

Discussion

 

General Patterns in Kashmir Valley

There is no data to suggest that the Asiatic Black Bear subspecies, U. t. laniger that occurs in northern India, is any more aggressive than other subspecies (Matt Hunt, co-chair IUCN Asiatic Black Bear Expert Team, pers. comm. August 8 2021). It is therefore more likely that the increased number of attacks are related to: 1) bears being in close proximity to humans, 2) a relatively high density of bears in the area, and finally, 3) how humans react to the presence of bears. Along these lines, it is important to note that in orchards, the bears not only eat the fruit and nuts but also potentially do extensive damage to the trees, such as breaking off productive branches. Because of this the bears are often actively chased and shooed away from the orchards. This aggressive interactions between humans and bears could be a contributing factor for the high rate of attacks in the region.

 

Reasons for the Decreases in Bear Attacks

The decrease in bear attacks since 2016 is likely due to 3 main reasons: 1) a number of bears have been killed in retaliation, 2) proactive work by the wildlife department, and 3) bear awareness programmes conducted by non-governmental organisations (NGOs). The total number of bears killed remains unknown, however, some of these killings have been documented, including incidents when bears have been tied and the tree set on fire. Other bear killings go unnoticed, such as, when bears are secretly poisoned or shot. To date there have been no prosecutions for killing bears. 

The wildlife department was able to be much more proactive starting in 2016. The political scenario in Kashmir has been very fragile in recent times, particularly from 2010–2016. Once the wildlife department was up and running, it was still poorly equipped and dealing with frequent closures in the valley. Even communication was hampered as mobile phone connectivity was not steady. These issues paralyzed normal life and resulted in fewer reports of wildlife-human conflicts. Because of this, people often took affairs into their own hands. Since 2016, the wildlife department has had greater man power & the necessary equipment including cages, tranquilizing guns, and vehicles as well as mobile connectivity, to deal with wildlife issues. Presently 42 control rooms work 24 hours a day, seven days a week, to attend to the wildlife distress calls. The number of rescue calls to the wildlife department as well as to other NGOs, including Wildlife SOS, has increased, which has led to a more professional handling of human-wildlife conflicts and has reduced the number of bear encounters and injuries to people.

Bear awareness & safety programs are also believed to have played an important role in reducing human-bear conflicts by educating people. These programs are largely being coordinated by NGOs in the region and stress awareness, especially when entering or conducting activities around orchards. 

 

Asiatic Black Bear Attack Overview

The causes and mitigation strategies for Asiatic Black Bear attacks are not well understood, especially in comparison to attacks by other bear species, namely, Grizzly Bears Ursus arctos, American Black Bears Ursus americanus, Sloth Bears Melursus ursinus, and even Polar Bears Ursus maritimus. This may be partly due to Asiatic Black Bear attacks being relatively rare. Existing studies tend to agree that the vast majority of Asiatic Black Bear attacks are defensive, most often occurring due to a surprise encounter (Thakur et al. 2007; Tak et al. 2009; Rasool et al. 2010; Akiyama et al. 2017). This certainly appears to be the case in Kashmir, India, however, predatory attacks on humans by Asiatic Black Bears have been reported in Japan (Yamazaki 2017; Oshima et al. 2018). This is perhaps not surprising  as Asiatic Black Bears are omnivorous and have been reported throughout parts of their range to actively hunt, kill, and eat primates, ungulates, and wild boar (Neas & Hoffman 1987; Hwang 2003; Gursky-Doyen & Nekaris 2007). Predatory attacks on humans appear to be exceptionally rare.

Behavioral approaches to safety in Asiatic Black Bear country should primarily focus on avoiding bear encounters and secondarily surviving defensive attacks with the fewest number of injuries. Making noise while moving into an area that bears may occur, giving the bear a chance to leave the area before the human and bear find themselves at close quarters, is a proven method to avoid attacks by Grizzly & Sloth Bears (Ordiz et al. 2013; Ratnayeke 2014; Sahlén et al. 2015; Sharp et al. 2020). This method would likely be effective in avoiding surprise encounters with Asiatic Black Bears as well.

There are advisories on what to do in case of a defensive attack by a bear. Herrero (2002) advocated falling to the ground and balling up while covering the head and face with your arms for surviving a defensive grizzly bear attack. Asiatic Black Bears, like Grizzly & Sloth Bears, focus on the head and face during an attack (Thakur et al 2007; Rasool et al. 2010). Falling to the ground and covering up allows attack victims to protect themselves from injury while allowing the Asiatic Black Bear to run off which they almost always do after overpowering a person.

 

 

Conclusion

 

The number of Asiatic Black Bear attacks in Kashmir have decreased notably since 2016, probably due to bears being removed from the area as well as government and non-government agencies working to lessen the number of negative encounters. The number of annual attacks should be monitored and tracked to detect future changes. Further studies are required to more fully and accurately understand the best methods to avoid and survive Asiatic Black Bear attacks. It is likely that certain behavioral strategies that work for avoiding or minimizing attacks from other bear species, namely Brown Bears & American Black Bears, will also work for the Asiatic Black Bear. However, this cannot be known with certainty without further research.  

 

Table 1. Ex gratia paid (in INR) to victims of Asiatic Black Bear attacks prior and post 2014.

Years

Minor injuries

Grievous injuries

Permanent incapacitation

Death

Prior to 2014

5000

Up to 33,000

50,000

100,000

2014-2020

15000

Up to 100,000

Up to 300,000

300,000

* Department of Forest, Ecology and Environment 2014

 

 

Table 2. Asiatic Black Bear attacks resulting in injury or death between 2006 and 2020 in Kashmir Valley, India.

Year

Number of recorded attacks

% of recorded attacks from the total number of attacks recorded from 2006–2020

Number of recorded deaths

% of recorded attacks that resulted in death the same year

2006

87

3.7

7

8.0

2007

93

4.0

8

8.6

2008

155

6.6

7

4.5

2009

182

7.8

8

4.4

2010

282

12.1

10

3.5

2011

275

11.8

13

4.7

2012

226

9.7

7

3.1

2013

256

10.9

12

4.7

2014

185

7.9

5

2.7

2015

205

8.8.

5

2.4

2016

135

5.8

6

4.4

2017

71

3.0

5

7.0

2018

63

2.7

5

7.9

2019

66

2.8

7

10.6

2020

49

2.1

4

8.2

 

 

Table 3. Asiatic Black Bear attacks by month from 2000–2020 in Kashmir, India.

January

February

March

April

May

June

July

August

September

October

November

December

26

(1.8%)

32

(2.2%)

45

(3.1%)

78

(5.4%)

118

(8.1%)

99

(6.8%)

182

(12.6%)

309

(21.3%)

203

(14.0%)

198

(13.7%)

115 (7.9%)

44

(3.0%)

 

 

For figures & images - - click here for full PDF

 

 

References

 

Akiyama, G., H. Kuwahara, R. Asahi, R. Tosa & H. Yokota (2017). Prompt procedures have a great impact on the consequences of Asiatic Black Bear mauling. Journal of Nippon Medical School 84(6): 294–300.

Ali, A., M. Waseem, M. Teng, S. Ali, M. Ishaq, A. Haseeb, A. Aryal & Z. Zhou (2018). Human-Asiatic Black Bear (Ursus thibetanus) interactions in the Kaghan Valley, Pakistan. Ethology Ecology and Evolution 30(5): 399–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/03949370.2017.1423113

Charoo, S.A., L.K. Sharma & S. Sathyakumar (2011). Asiatic Black Bear-human interactions around Dachigam National Park, Kashmir, India. Ursus 22(2): 106–113.

Chauhan, N.P.S. (2003). Human casualties and livestock depredation by black and brown bears in the Indian Himalaya, 1989-98. Ursus 14(1): 84-8.

Choudhury, S., M. Ali, T. Mubashir, S.N. Ahmad, M.N. Sofi, I. Mughal, U.K. Sarma, A.K. Srivastava & R. Kaul (2008). Predator Alert - Attacks on humans by leopards and Asiatic Black Bear in the Kashmir valley - Analysis of case studies and spatial patterns of elevated conflict. Wildlife Trust of India, 76 pp.

Department of Forest, Ecology and Environment (2014). Payment of ex-gratia relief for deaths/injuries caused to the human life on account of man-animal conflict cases. Government of Jammu and Kashmir, Department of Forest, Ecology and Environment, Secretariat of Srinagar. Government Order No. 244 - FST of 2014

Garshelis, D.L. & R. Steinmetz (2020). Ursus thibetanus. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Downloaded on January 22, 2022. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008. RLTS.T22824A9391633.en

Gursky-Doyen, S. & K.A.I. Nekaris (2007). Primate anti-predator strategies. Springer Science & Business Media,  404 pp.

Herrero, S. (2002). Bear attacks: their causes and avoidance. Revised edition. Lyons Press, Guilford, Connecticut, USA, 282 pp.

Hwang, M.H. (2003). Ecology of the Asiatic Black Bear and people-bear interactions in Yushan National Park, Taiwan. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Minnesota, 78 pp.

Jamtsho, Y. & S. Wangchuk (2018). Assessing patterns of human-Asiatic Black Bear interaction in and around Wangchuck Centennial National Park, Bhutan. Global Ecology and Conservation 8: 183–189.

Neas, J.F. & R.S. Hoffmann (1987). “Burdocas taxicolor”. Mammalian Species 277: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.2307/3503907

Ordiz, A., O-G. Støen , S. Sæbø, V. Sahlén, B.E. Pedersen, J. Kindberg & J.E. Swenson (2013). Lasting behavioural responses of brown bears to experimental human encounters. Journal of Applied Ecology 50: 306–314.

Oshima, T., M. Ohtani & S. Mimasaka (2018). Injury patterns of fatal bear attacks in Japan: A description of seven cases. Forensic Science International 286: 14–19.

Penjor, D. & T. Dorji (2020). Circumstances of human conflicts with bears and patterns of bear maul injuries in Bhutan: Review of records 2015–2019. PLoS One 15(8): 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237812

Rasool, A., A.H. Wani, M.A. Darzi, M.I. Zaroo, S. Iqbal, S.A. Bashir, S. Rashid & R.A. Lone (2010). Incidence and pattern of bear maul injuries in Kashmir. Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured 41: 116–119.

Ratnayeke, S., F.T. Van Manen, R. Pieris & V.S. Pragash (2014). Challenges of large carnivore conservation: sloth bear attacks in Sri Lanka. Human Ecology 42(3): 467–479.

Sahlén V, A. Ordiz, J.E. Swenson & O.-G. Støen (2015) Behavioural differences between single Scandinavian brown bears (Ursus arctos) and females with dependent young when experimentally approached by humans. PLoS ONE 10(4): 16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121576

Sanwal, C.S. & R.A. Lone (2012). An assessment of the Asiatic Black Bear human conflicts in Kupwara District, Jammu & Kashmir, India. Indian Forester 138(10): 881–886.

Sharp, T., S. Swaminathan, A.S. Arun, T. Smith, K. Satyanarayan, & G. Seshamani (2020). Sloth bear attacks on the Deccan Plateau of Karnataka, India. Ursus 31: 11. https://doi.org/10.2192/URSUS-D-18-00027.3

Tak, S.R., D.G. Nabi, M.A. Halwai & B.A. Mir (2009). Injuries from bear (Ursus thibetanus) attacks in Kashmir. Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery 15: 130–134.

Thakur, J.S., C. Mohan & D.R. Sharma (2007). Himalayan black bear mauling: offense or defense? American Journal of Otolaryngology 28(4): 247–250.

Yamazaki, K. (2017). Consecutive fatal attacks by Asiatic Black Bear on humans in Northern Japan. International Bear News 26: 16–17.

Zahoor, B., A. Ahmad, R.A. Aziz & M.S. Awan (2020). Damages done by black bear (Ursus thibetanus) in Moji Game Reserve and its surroundings, Leepa Valley, Azad Jammu and Kashmir (Pakistan). Pakistan Journal of Zoology 53(1): 217–225.  https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/20170317130336