Ecology and population structure of a terrestrial mycoheterotrophic orchid, Aphyllorchis montana Rchb.f. (Orchidaceae) in Soppinabettaforests of the Western Ghats, India

 

Palatty Allesh Sinu 1,2, Neethu Sinu 3 & Kruthik Chandrashekara 4

 

1Department of Animal Science, Central University of Kerala, PadennakadP.O., Kasaragod, Kerala 671328, India

2 Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment, Royal Enclave, Jakkur Post, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

3 Palatty House, PuthenvelikaraP.O., Ernakulam, Kerala 683594, India

4 Krushikoota, Begar post, Sringeri, Chikmagalur, Karnataka 577139, India

Email: 1 sinupa@gmail.com (corresponding author), 3 neethu_punneli@yahoo.co.in, 4krushikoota@yahoo.com

 

 

 

Date of publication (online): 26 August 2012

Date of publication (print): 26 August 2012

ISSN 0974-7907 (online) | 0974-7893 (print)

 

Editor:Pankaj Kumar

 

Manuscript details:

Ms # o2743

Received 01 April 2011

Final received 05 July 2012

Finally accepted 22 July 2012

 

Citation: Sinu, P.A., N. Sinu & K. Chandrashekara (2012). Ecology and population structure of a terrestrial mycoheterotrophic orchid, Aphyllorchis montana Rchb.f. (Orchidaceae) in Soppinabettaforests of the Western Ghats, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 4(9): 2915–2919.

 

Copyright: © Palatty Allesh Sinu, Neethu Sinu & Kruthik Chandrashekara 2012. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. JoTT allows unrestricted use of this article in any medium for non-profit purposes, reproduction and distribution by providing adequate credit to the authors and the source of publication.

 

Acknowledgements: The study was supported by a DST Young Scientist grant of the Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi & Conservation, Research and Exploration grant of the National Geographic Society, USA to PAS and an ATREE (Bangalore) small grant program to KC. We thank the anonymous reviewers for the constructive comments that helped us to improve the manuscript.

 

 

 

For figures, images, tables -- click here

 

 

The Western Ghats is a mega-biodiversity hotspot in India, and one among the 34 global Biodiversity Hotspots (Mittermeieret al. 2004).  The 1,60,000km2hill stretch inhabits at least 1,500 endemic plant species that includes many rare, endangered and threatened plants (Ahamedullah& Nayar 1986).  During our ongoing research in an unprotected, farmer-managed Soppinabetta forest (Sinu et al. 2011, 2012) of Western Ghats, we came across several populations of a data-deficient mycoheterotrophicterrestrial orchid species, Aphyllorchis montana Rchb. f..  Here we report the population structure and ecology of the species, and discuss the possible reasons for the locally rare status of the species in the Western Ghats.

Aphyllorchis montana is a terrestrial mycoheterotrophic(McKendrick et al. 2002) orchid species that grows in low and midland broadleaved forests of India, Sri Lanka, Malaysia, Borneo, the Philippines, southern Japan, southern China, Vietnam and Taiwan (Boufford et al. 2003).  Aphyllorchis montana is categorized as a data deficient orchid of conservation concern in India, and is enlisted in the RET plant list of India (Mohanan et al. 1982; Santhan & Rajasekaran 1993; Nayar et al. 2006). A total of 30 species (Xinqi & Gale 2009) belonging to the genus Aphyllorchis Blume are known to exist in various parts of the world of which three species have been reported from India, namely, Aphyllorchis alpina King & Pantl., Aphyllorchis gollanii Duthie and Aphyllorchis montana Rchb.f. The ecology and breeding system of the species and the possible causes for its rarity are not known.  The non-chlorophyllous, non-leafy single erect orchid shoot grows to a height of 20–60 cm, and bears laxly arranged flowers in raceme (Image 1).

 

Materials and Methods

The study was conducted in Soppinabetta forests of Sringeri area 12055’–13054’N and 75001’–75022’E, average 725m above sea level) of central Western Ghats in Karnataka State of India.  The sparsely populated Sringeri Taluk is largely under the forest cover of two types, reserve forests (owned by the forest department) and Soppinabetta forests (leased to local farmers by the forest department as a source of organic manure; hereafter, “SBF”) (Sinu et al. 2012). The forests of Sringeri adjoin pristine evergreen forests of Kudremukh National Park and Agumbe rain forests. The mean annual rainfall at Sringeri varies between 4,000 and 6,500 mm (Pascal 1988).  Most of the rainfall happens during the southwest monsoon (June–September). Mean daily maximum temperatures vary between 22.80C (July) and 35.10C (April). However, the mean daily minimum temperature varies between 13.20C (January) and 19.80C (May).

SBF are managed semi-evergreen forest patches (area ca. 1–4 ha)  and can be ascribed as Hopea ponga-Memecylon umbellatum-Dimocarpus longan-Vateria indica-Syzigiumspp. type (P.A. Sinu pers. obs. 2006–2007).  However, the dominance of the tree species varies between forest patches.  Vateria indica L., Hopea ponga (Dennst.) Mabb. and Hopea parviflora Bedd. (Dipterocarpaceae) are some of the canopy tree species that have clear dominance in some SBFs.

Fourteen different SBFs were surveyed to study the distribution and population structure of A. montana (Table 1).  The study was undertaken in the monsoon months (July–September) of 2007 and 2008.  All the selected forest fragments were less than 4ha in size; hence, the survey was conducted on the entire forest floor. Vegetation structure and tree composition, however, was estimated using two belt transects of 100×10 m in each forest patch.  Once the orchid was detected, a fine-scale leaf litter study was made in the vicinity of the orchids. Leaf litter of 30×30 cm2 quadrate that surrounds the orchid clump was studied; the number of leaves (fresh and old) in the litter bed was checked by inserting a fine knife; litter depth was checked using a measuring gradient scale; and the tree species of the leaves was recorded.  Canopy cover was visually ranked from six random points in each of the forest patches.  The clump size, length of the shoots, number of flowers, and number of fruit capsules were recorded for every recorded orchid clump.  The distance between two orchid clumps was measured in each of the forest fragments.

The differences in the number of orchid clumps between years and forest fragments were compared using Mann-Whitney U test and KruskalWallis rank ANOVA test, respectively.

 

Results

The flowering A. montanashoots were seen by the onset of southwest monsoon in June.  The flowering of the orchid continued until mid September.  Fruit development occurred until mid October. Although the orchid was found growing with a single shoot in some fragments, most of them were found in clumps (Image 1) of up to 13 shoots (average 3.83 shoots/clump (± 3.21 SD; N=70).  The length of the erect shoots varied between 16cm and 78cm (av. 40.86±12.70 SD; N=268).  The number of flowers per shoot varied between five and 24 (av. 11.47±3.65 SD; N=149).  The fruit set ranged between 0% and 64.7% per shoot (N=214) of the flowers set fruits.  Orchid distribution tends to be cluttered; the inter-clump distance ranged between four and 21 m in a forest fragment (av. 9.8±3.9 m SD; N=30). The voucher specimens are deposited in the Sringerifield station of ATREE (17.viii.2007, 4 nos, Soppinabetta Kumbarakodu: SRINGERI, Collection no. 315).

The orchid clumps were located only in five SBF fragments that were separated by 6–20 km.  The SBFs having the orchid populations were dipterocarpspecies dominated (H. ponga, H. parviflora and V. indica).  The orchid clumps were seen under the thick canopy (>80% canopy cover) of forests.  Overall, 286 orchid shoots of 72 clumps were recorded in both the years. Most of these clumps were present during 2007 and 2008.  However, two additional clumps were located, and some of the previously located clumps were enriched by additional shoots in 2008 survey (Fig. 1).  The difference in the number of orchid shoots between years was not significant (Mann-Whitney U test: U=463.5, P=0.08; Fig. 1).  The difference in the number of orchid shoots between five SBFs was also not significant (Kruskal-Wallis test: H=3.99, d.f.=4, P=0.40; Fig. 1).

 

Discussion

Terrestrial orchids are in need of species-specific fungi for seed germination and growth (Warcup 1973; Clements et al. 1986); however, the relationship is obligate in mycoheterotrophicorchids (McCormick et al. 2004).  As the vegetative growth of the terrestrial mycoheterotrophicorchid is absolutely an underground mechanism, it is a challenge to locate them in vegetative conditions (Rasmussen & Whigham1998).  Although the present study does not go in depth to identify the ectomycorrhizalfungi associated with the A. montana, the study assumes that the fungi is also associated with dipterocarpplants (Tho et al. 2007).

The study initiated with the assumption that A. montana occurs in dipterocarpplant dominated forests.  Tho et al. (2007) reported A. montana populations in Shorea guiso and Vatica odorata (Dipterocarpaceae) dominated forests in Vietnam.  The results supported our assumption as we found four A. montana populations in the H. ponga dominated SBFs, and the fifth population in a V.indica dominated SBF.  It is also previously reported that leaf litter quantity and quality has an effect on some symbiotic associations, such as mycorrhiza-plant associations in tropical forests (Rasmussen & Whigham 1998; Batty et al. 2001; Bergman et al. 2006).  Meanwhile, some SBFs having H. ponga as a co-dominant species had no A. montana in it (Table 1), indicates the effects of other environmental features on the population ecology of A. montana.

A. montana distributed in a cluttered manner in forest fragments indicates that the germination happens in the vicinity of fruiting orchids (Bergman et al. 2006). In some fragments, the overall orchid distribution was limited within a 30m radius.  The study also showed that the orchid grows in clumps of 2–13 shoots.  Both these findings indicate that the patchy distribution of associated fungi primarily determines the terrestrial mycoheterotrophic orchid growth and colonization.    The reports that germination in terrestrial orchids increases in the vicinity of the adult orchid (Rasmussen & Whigham 1998) also would have been a reason behind the clumpy growth of the species, but this is required to be studied in more detail.  Large numbers of fruit capsules indicate that there are no reproductive barriers in the species.  However, it is worth undertaking a study on the pollination system in the species.   Although we did not extend our study further, we could collect 42 muscid flies (Muscidae: Diptera) from a fruit capsule.  This indicates that the seed predation by some agents, either the muscid fly itself or some lepidopteran caterpillar that was parasitized by the fly, exists in the species.  This may be a reason why seeds do not disperse to a great distance.

The data deficiency status of the species in India might be due to the sampling artifact (Rao 1998).  Like many other mycoheterotrophicterrestrial orchids, the above ground stage of the orchid is visible only in a narrow window of time during peak monsoon in India, a period of few botanical expeditions.  The present inventory of A. montana populations in SBFs of Sringeri point out that unprotected human-influenced forests of Western Ghats are also significant in the conservation of rare and endangered flora and fauna (Sinu et al. 2011).  Based on the present and some previous studies, it is imperative that conservation practitioners identify various ‘potentially-unprotected forests’ in the Western Ghats, while designating ecologically sensitive areas (Gadgil et al. 2011).

 

 

References

 

Ahamedullah, M. & M.P. Nayar (1986). Endemic Plants of Indian Region (Vol. 1). Botanical Survey of India, Calcutta, 261pp.

Batty, A.L., K.W. Dixon, M. Brundrett & K. Sivasithamparam (2001). Constraints to symbiotic germination of terrestrial orchid seed in a Mediterranean bushland. New Phytologist 152: 511–520.

Bergman E, J.D. Ackerman, J. Thompson & J.K. Zimmerman (2006). Land-use history affects the distribution of the saprophytic orchid Wullschlaegelia calcarata in Puerto Rico’s Tabonucoforest. Biotropica 38: 492–499.

Boufford, D.E., C.F. Hsieh, T.C. Huang, C.S. Kuoh, H. Ohashi, C.I. Peng, J.L. Tsai & K.C. Yang (eds.) (2003). Flora of Taiwan 2ndEdition (Vol. 6). Department of Botany, National Taiwan University, Taipei, 343pp.

Clements, M.A., H. Muir & P.J. Cribb (1986). A preliminary report on symbiotic germination of European terrestrial orchids. Kew Bulletin 41: 437–445.

Gadgil, M., R.J. Daniels, K.N. Ganeshaiah, S. NarendraPrasad, M.S.R. Murthy, C.S. Jha, B.R. Ramesh & K.A. Subramanian (2011). Mapping ecologically sensitive, significant and salient areas of Western Ghats: proposed protocols and methodology. Current Science 100: 175–182.

McCormick, M.K., D.F. Whigham & J.P. O’Neill (2004). Mycorrhizaldiversity in photosynthetic terrestrial orchids. NewPhytologist 163: 425–438.

McKendrick, S.L., J.R. Leake, D.L. Taylor & D. Read (2002). Symbiotic germination and development of the mycoheterotrophicorchid Neottia nidusavisin nature and its requirement for locally distributed Sebacinaspp. New Phytologist154: 233–247.

Mittermeier, R.A., P. Robles-Gil, M. Hoffmann, J.D. Pilgrim, T.M. Brooks, C.G. Mittermeier, J.L. Lamoreux & G. Fonseca (2004). Hotspots Revisited: Earth’s Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Terrestrial Ecoregions. CEMEX, Mexico City, 390pp.

Mohanan, M., A.N. Henry & N.C. Nair (1982). Notes of three rare and interesting orchids collected from Trivandrum District, Kerala. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 79: 234–236.

Nayar, T.S., A.R. Beegam, N. Mohanan & G. Rajkumar (2006). Flowering Plants of Kerala - A Handbook. Tropical Botanical Garden and Research Institute, Thiruvananthapuram, 1069pp.

Rao, T.A. (1998). Conservation of Wild Orchids of Kodagu in The Western Ghats. The Karnataka Association for the Advancement of Sciences, Bangalore, 242pp.

Rasmussen, H.N. & D.F. Whigham (1998). The underground phase: a special challenge in studies of terrestrial orchid populations. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 126: 49–64.

Santhan, P. & K. Rajasekaran (1993). Karyologicalstudy on Aphyllorchis montana Reichbf.f. (Orchidaceae). Current Science 64: 321–323.

Tho, L., B.H. Manh, N. Vu Khoi& L.D. Tuan (2007). Aphyllorchis montana (Reichenbf.f.). Wildlife at risk <http://www.wildlifeatrisk.org/uploads/News/War%20Publication/E5.%20Aphyllorchis%20montana%20-%20Eng.pdf> (accessed on 14 March 2011)

Sinu P.A., G. Kuriakose& K. Chandrashekara (2011). Epiphytic orchid diversity in farmer-managed Soppinabettaforests of Western Ghats: Implications for conservation. Current Science 101: 1337–1346.

SinuP.A., S. Kent, & K. Chandrashekara (2012). Forest resource use and perception of farmers on conservation of a usufruct forest (Soppinabetta) of Western Ghats, India. Land Use Policy 29: 702–709

Warcup, J.H. (1973). Symbiotic germination of some Australian terrestrial orchids. NewPhytologist 72: 387–392.

Xinqi, C. & S.W. Gale (2009). Aphyllorchis Blume, pp.177–179. In: Z.Y. Wu, P.H. Raven & D.Y. Hong (eds.).Flora of China 25 (Orchidaceae).Science Press, Beijing, and Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis.