Journal of Threatened Taxa |
www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 June 2022 | 14(6): 21285–21289
ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) | ISSN 0974-7893
(Print)
https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.7871.14.6.21285-21289
#7871 | Received 07 February 2022 | Final
received 12 March 2022 | Finally accepted 22 June 2022
Landings of IUCN Red Listed
finfishes at Chetlat Island of Lakshadweep, southeastern Arabian Sea
Davood Nihal 1,
N.M. Naseem 2, N. Abhirami 3 & M.P. Prabhakaran 4
1,4 Department of Aquatic Environment
Management, Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies, Panangad, Kochi, Kerala 682506, India.
1 Centre for Marine Living
Resources and Ecology (CMLRE), Govt of India, Kochi, Kerala 682508, India.
2 Department of Environment and
Forest, Chetlat Range, UT of Lakshadweep 682554,
India.
3 Department of Aquatic Environment
Management, Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Versova,
Mumbai, Maharashtra 400061, India.
1 davoodnihalkufos@gmail.com
(corresponding author), 2 naseemdon8@gmail.com, 3 abhiramin15@gmail.com,
4 prabhusagar@gmail.com
Editor: Anonymity requested. Date of publication: 26 June 2022 (online & print)
Citation: Nihal, D., N.M. Naseem, N. Abhirami
& M.P. Prabhakaran (2022). Landings of IUCN Red Listed finfishes at Chetlat Island of Lakshadweep, southeastern
Arabian Sea. Journal of Threatened Taxa 14(6): 21285–21289. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.7871.14.6.21285-21289
Copyright: © Nihal et al. 2022. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
License. JoTT
allows unrestricted use, reproduction, and distribution of this article in any
medium by providing adequate credit to the author(s) and the source of
publication.
Funding: Self-funded.
Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Acknowledgements: All the authors are grateful to
Department of Environment and Forest, UT of Lakshadweep India and Kerala
University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies, Panangad,
Kochi, India.
Abstract: The Lakshadweep Islands are
well-known for their abundant fishery resources. Present study primarily
focused on the systematic representation of IUCN (International Union for
Conservation of Nature) Red Listed marine finfish landings of Chetlat Island of Lakshadweep archipelago (India). Monthly
collections were carried out from September 2019 to February 2020 from the
study area. A list of finfishes along with their scientific name, common name,
family, and present conservation status was prepared. As per the IUCN Red List,
out of 41 fish species identified, one species is ‘Endangered’ (EN), two
species are ‘Near Threatened’ (NT), four species are ‘Vulnerable’ (VU), one
species ‘Data Deficient’ (DD), 29 species ‘Least Concern’ (LC), and four
species are ‘Not Evaluated’ (NE) categories. Information on the conservation
status of fishes plays a significant role in fisheries science since it forms
the basis for managing marine fishery resources.
Keywords: Conservation status, fisheries,
island, India, marine fishes.
India is home to a diverse range
of flora and fauna and is considered as one of the world’s richest biodiversity countries. Fisheries
contribute significantly to India’s national economy (1.21% of total gross
domestic product (GDP) and 5.3% of agricultural GDP) and bestow livelihoods to about 10 million people (Infantina et al. 2016). Fishery resources in India are one
of the most diversified and most significant natural resources in the world
with respect to the abundance of fish species. Marine ecosystems are currently
facing an intensified loss of species and populations due to increasing
anthropogenic activities, with unknown consequences (Worm et al. 2006). There
is a significant alarm about the increasing human interference on marine
biodiversity in recent years (Costello et al 2010; Nihal et al. 2021). Since
the 1950s, the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) has issued
lists of endangered species, which have been compiled as Red Data Books and Red
Lists (Butchart et al. 2005). The IUCN Red List (2017) categorized the species
into nine groups based on their population size, rate of decline, geographic
distribution area, degree of population, and distribution fragmentation. These
include Extinct (EX), Extinct in the wild (EW), Critically Endangered (CR),
Endangered (EN), Vulnerable (VU), Near Threatened (NT), Least Concern (LC),
Data Deficient (DD), and Not Evaluated (NE). The islands of Lakshadweep form
India’s smallest Union Territory and are typical atolls formed by the perpetual
deposition of corals (Tripathy 2002). The archipelago
of Lakshadweep, located in the southern Arabian Sea, encompasses 36 islands
that make up a group of India’s major coral reef complex (Vyshnavi
et al. 2020). Fisheries support thousands of fisherman families in and around
the island’s coastal settlements. The atolls offers a network of habitats for a
variety of fish species, both resident and migratory. It forms a model marine
system where differentiation of ecologically sensitive and vulnerable regions
is challenging due to dependence on its resources. As our knowledge on marine
biodiversity is yet inadequate to guide our actions, a careful approach, such
as establishing marine reserves, may be required (Tripathy
2002). The fisheries in the Lakshadweep Islands have always been sustainable
and subsistence oriented. Tuna and needlefish account for around 95% of the
total commercial fisheries in the Lakshadweep Islands, where fishing is the
primary source of income (Vinay et al. 2017). These fishes have traditionally
been caught with troll line, pole and line, handline and drift gillnet.
Knowledge regarding the condition of threatened species biodiversity is
critical for protecting species in the wild from extinction and conserving them
via good management so they can continue to exist in their natural habitat
(Pimm et al. 2015). The ability to tackle biodiversity management and
conservation is highly dependent on a thorough understanding of the taxonomy of
the flora and fauna that make up biodiversity (Joshi et al. 2016). We have
carried out a survey of IUCN Red Listed species of various species landed, and
the findings of the same are depicted in this manuscript.
Materials and Methods
Chetlat is an atoll within the
Lakshadweep archipelago in the Arabian Sea, off the west coast of India. It is
56 km north of Amini and 432 km (233 nautical miles)
west of Kochi. It is located between 11.68 & 11.71 N and 72.68 & 72.71
E and covers an area of 1.40 km2 (Fig 1). The samples were taken
every month from fisherman during September 2019 to February 2020 from the
study area. The collected fish species were identified using standard
references and keys (Misra 1952; Ebert & Mostarda 2013; Froese & Pauly
2021). A Canon IXUS 190 digital camera was used to acquire the fish
photographs. During the auction, fish samples were chosen at random from each
mound. All of the samples were rinsed thoroughly with tap water, and preserved
in 10% formaldehyde for subsequent analysis in the laboratory. The data on the
conservation status of the collected fishes were ascertained according to their
IUCN Red List status (IUCN Red List 2017). The data regarding gears used for
catching different fishes were obtained from local fishermen.
Results
During the present study, 654
marine fishes belonging to 41 distinct fish species under 20 different families
were identified. The Red List status of all identified species was examined,
and 41 of them were found to be listed under the 2017 IUCN Red List. The
detailed information on species name, family, common name, and IUCN status is
given in Table 1. Scombridae was the most
represented, out of 20 families, with seven fish species. Lutjanidae
was second most represented with four species belonging under it. Belonidae and Carcharhinidae were
represented by three species from each family. Two species were represented by
each of the following families including Istiophoridae,
Carangidae, Serranidae, Lethrinidae, Dasyatidae,
Acanthuridae, Spratelloididae, and Mullidae. Only one species from the families of Xiphiidae, Sphyraenidae, Coryphaenidae, Exocoetidae, Hemiramphidae, Alopiidae, Gerreidae, and Pinguipedidae was
recorded. Out of the 41 fish species sampled, one species was ‘Endangered’,
four species were ‘Vulnerable’, two species were ‘Near Threatened’, 29 species
were ‘Least Concern’, one species was ‘Data Deficient’, and four species were
‘Not Evaluated’ as per the IUCN Red List (Figure 2). The scombroid fishes
collected were caught using the gears including pole & line and hook &
line. The fishes belonging to the family Carcharhinidae
and Carangidae were caught using hook & line.
Handlines, gill nets and cast nets were used to catch the fishes coming under
the families of Lethrinidae and Lutjanidae.
Seine nets were used to catch belonids.
Discussion
The fish diversity in Chetlat was studied using visual examination and
descriptive statistics. Tuna, needle fish, sword fish, wahoo, trevally,
grouper, sharks, dolphin fish, half beak, sailfish, red snapper, marlins,
unicorn fish, emperor fish, goat fish, sting ray, carangids, and perches were
among the most common landings in the study area. Scombridae
constituted the major catch out of the fishes sampled. The islanders’ major
source of income is tuna fishing, which takes place for roughly six months,
from October to April and forms the major resource (Vinay et al. 2017). Tunas
are highly migratory, effective epipelagic predators found more prevalent in
the Indian exclusive economic zone’s oceanic island regions, particularly
Lakshadweep (Kumar et al. 2020). Among the fishes identified, Alopias pelagicus
(pelagic thresher) constitutes the only fish coming under endangered category
as per IUCN status. The pelagic thresher is abundantly captured in gill nets
and longlines, and is especially abundant in tuna fisheries. It has been found
that intense exploitation would be unsustainable considering the pelagic
thresher’s vulnerability (Camhi 2008). Carcharhinus limbatus
and Scoliodon laticaudus
belong to the ‘Near Threatened’ category possibly due to the recent
population decline documented across its range and hence there is a pressing
need for monitoring and regulation (Antony et al. 2014; Smart et al. 2017; Haque et al. 2019). Unsustainable development activities, a
rise in human population, overexploitation, and climate change substantially
influences the biodiversity of the island (KSCSTE 2013). Overexploitation of
these species for food is a primary concern, which has resulted in dramatic population
decrease. Anthropogenic interventions have disastrous consequences for island
biodiversity. Therefore, conservationists and policymakers must pay close
attention (Bijukumar et al. 2015). In 2020, 164,000
tonnes of fishes were landed in Lakshadweep, a 28 percent decrease from the
previous year (of 22,929 tonnes) following the same trend of decline as in the
preceding year 2018–2019 (CMFRI 2019; 2020). This could be attributed by the
improper management and overexploitation of fishery resources. Understanding a
region’s fish diversity is regarded as critical not only for management but
also for conservation and sustainable utilization of fishery resources (Nihal
et al. 2021). Proper utilisation of fish discards at the landing centre for
fish meal and fertilizer production purposes would prevent the depletion of
such resources in the near future. Insular ecosystem rich in endemism is more
susceptible to species depletion due to its small population being restricted
to live in specific habitats (Andrades et al. 2018).
Previous studies on the conservation status of fishes are scanty in
Lakshadweep, particularly in Chetlat Island. Covid scenario might be also considered as a reason for the
reduction in fish catch correlated with the smaller number of fishing days. In
light of the above findings, the current study aims to offer a well-documented
checklist of major finfishes in Chetlat waters, its
diversity, species composition and IUCN status. Conservation and management
plans must be developed to ensure the future of island ecosystem. The baseline
data on fish distribution and diversity will aid in the design of successful
conservation strategies for insular ecosystems such as Chetlat
atoll.
Table 1. List of species recorded from the study area
with common name, family and present conservation status.
|
Species |
Common name |
Family |
IUCN Red List
status |
1 |
Ablennes hians (Valenciennes, 1846) |
Flat Needlefish |
Belonidae |
LC |
2 |
Acanthocybium solandri (Cuvier, 1832)
|
Wahoo |
Scombridae |
LC |
3 |
Alopias pelagicus Nakamura, 1935
|
Pelagic Thresher |
Alopiidae |
EN |
4 |
Aprion virescens Valenciennes, 1830
|
Green Jobfish |
Lutjanidae |
LC |
5 |
Auxis thazard (Lacepede, 1800)
|
Frigate Tuna |
Scombridae |
LC |
6 |
Belone belone (Linnaeus, 1760)
|
Garfish |
Belonidae |
LC |
7 |
Caranx ignobilis (Forsskal, 1775)
|
Giant Trevally |
Carangidae |
LC |
8 |
Carcharhinus limbatus (Valenciennes, 1839)
|
Blacktip Shark |
Carcharhinidae |
NT |
9 |
Coryphaena hippurus Linnaeus, 1758
|
Common Dolphinfish |
Coryphaenidae |
LC |
10 |
Elagatis bipinnulata (Quoy & Gaimard, 1825)
|
Rainbow Runner |
Carangidae |
LC |
11 |
Epinephelus erythrurus (Valenciennes, 1828)
|
Cloudy Grouper |
Serranidae |
LC |
12 |
Epinephelus fasciatus (Forsskal, 1775)
|
Blacktip Grouper |
Serranidae |
LC |
13 |
Euthynnus affinis (Cantor, 1849) |
Kawakawa |
Scombridae |
LC |
14 |
Exocoetus volitans Linnaeus, 1758
|
Tropical Two-wing Flyingfish |
Exocoetidae |
LC |
15 |
Gerres microphthalmus Iwatsuki, Kimura & Yoshino, 2002
|
Small-eyed Whipfin Mojarra |
Gerreidae |
NE |
16 |
Gymnosarda unicolor (Ruppell, 1836)
|
Dogtooth Tuna |
Scombridae |
LC |
17 |
Hemiramphus far (Forsskal, 1775)
|
Black-barred Halfbeak |
Hemiramphidae |
NE |
18 |
Istiophorus platypterus (Shaw, 1792)
|
Indo-Pacific Sailfish |
Istiophoridae |
LC |
19 |
Katsuwonus pelamis (Linnaeus, 1758)
|
Skipjack Tuna |
Scombridae |
LC |
20 |
Lethrinus lentjan (Lacepede, 1802)
|
Pink Ear Emperor |
Lethrinidae |
LC |
21 |
Lutjanus bohar (Forsskal, 1775)
|
Two-spot Red Snapper |
Lutjanidae |
LC |
22 |
Lutjanus gibbus (Forsskal, 1775) |
Humpback Red Snapper |
Lutjanidae |
LC |
23 |
Lutjanus rivulatus (Cuvier, 1828)
|
Blubberlip Snapper |
Lutjanidae |
LC |
24 |
Makaira nigricans Lacepede, 1802
|
Blue Marlin |
Istiophoridae |
VU |
25 |
Monotaxis heterodon (Bleeker, 1854)
|
Redfin Emperor |
Lethrinidae |
LC |
26 |
Naso hexacanthus (Bleeker, 1855)
|
Sleek Unicornfish |
Acanthuridae |
LC |
27 |
Naso tonganus (Valenciennes, 1835)
|
Bulbnose unicornfish |
Acanthuridae |
LC |
28 |
Neotrygon kuhlii (Muller & Henle, 1841)
|
Blue-spotted Stingray |
Dasyatidae |
DD |
29 |
Parapercis millepunctata (Gunther, 1860)
|
Black-dotted Sand Perch |
Pinguipedidae |
NE |
30 |
Parupeneus indicus (Shaw, 1803)
|
Indian Goatfish |
Mullidae |
LC |
31 |
Parupeneus macronemus (Lacepede, 1801)
|
Long-barbel Goatfish |
Mullidae |
LC |
32 |
Rhizoprionodon acutus (Ruppell, 1837) |
Milk Shark |
Carcharhinidae |
VU |
33 |
Scoliodon laticaudus Muller & Henle, 1838
|
Spadenose Shark |
Carcharhinidae |
NT |
34 |
Sphyraena jello Cuvier, 1829
|
Pickhandle Barracuda |
Sphyraenidae |
NE in India |
35 |
Spratelloides delicatulus (Bennett, 1832)
|
Delicate Round Herring |
Spratelloididae |
LC |
36 |
Spratelloides gracilis (Temminck & Schlegel, 1846)
|
Silver-stripe Round Herring |
Spratelloididae |
LC |
37 |
Taeniurops meyeni (Muller & Henle, 1841)
|
Round Ribbontail Ray |
Dasyatidae |
VU |
38 |
Thunnus albacares (Bonnaterre, 1788)
|
Yellowfin Tuna |
Scombridae |
LC |
39 |
Thunnus obesus (Lowe, 1839)
|
Bigeye Tuna |
Scombridae |
VU |
40 |
Tylosurus crocodilus (Peron & Lesueur, 1821)
|
Hound Needlefish |
Belonidae |
LC |
41 |
Xiphias gladius Linnaeus, 1758
|
Swordfish |
Xiphiidae |
LC |
EN—Endangered | VU—Vulnerable | NT—Near Threatened | LC—Least Concern |
DD—Data Deficient | NE—Not Evaluated.
For figures - -
click here for full PDF
Reference
Andrades, R., J.A. Reis-Filho, R.M. Macieira, T.Giarrizzo & J.C.
Joyeux (2018). Endemic fish
species structuring oceanic intertidal reef assemblages. Scientific Reports
8(1): 10791. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29088-0
Kumar,
K.V.A., K.P. Deepa, M.M.M. Rafeeq, G.S. Renjima, H. Manjebrayakath, B.R.
Smitha & M. Sudhakar (2020). Near reef abundance and on–offshore distribution of
tuna larvae around Minicoy Island in Lakshadweep Sea, India. Marine Biology
Research 16(2): 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/17451000.2019.1704018
Antoni, L.,
P.L. Luque, K. Naghshpour
& E.A. Saillant (2014). Polymorphic microsatellite
markers for the Yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares). Conservation Genetics Resources
6(3): 609–611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-014-0152-5
Bijukumar, A., R. Ravinesh,
A.R. Arathi & K.K. Idreesbabu
(2015). On the
molluscan fauna of Lakshadweep included in various schedules of Wildlife
(Protection) Act of India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 7(6): 7253–7268. https://doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.o4140.7253-68
Butchart,
S.H., A.J. Stattersfield, J. Baillie, L.A. Bennun, S.N. Stuart, H.R. Akçakaya
& G.M. Mace (2005). Using Red List Indices to measure progress towards the 2010 target and
beyond. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological
Sciences 360(1454): 255–268. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1583
Camhi, M. D. (2008). Conservation status of pelagic
elasmobranchs, pp. 397–417. In: Camhi, M.D., E.K. Pikitch & E.A. Babcock (eds.). Sharks of the Open
Ocean: Biology, Fisheries and Conservation. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 502
pp. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444302516
Costello,
M.J., M. Coll, R. Danovaro, P. Halpin, H. Ojaveer & P. Miloslavich
(2010). A census of
marine biodiversity knowledge, resources, and future challenges. PloS one 5(8): e12110. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012110
CMFRI (2019). CMFRI Annual Report 2018–19.
Accessed on 5 December 2021. http://eprints.cmfri.org.in/id/eprint/13922
CMFRI (2020). CMFRI Annual Report 2019–20.
Accessed on 5 December 2021. http://eprints.cmfri.org.in/id/eprint/15458
Ebert, D.A.
& E. Mostarda (2013). Identification guide to the
deep-sea cartilaginous fishes of the Indian Ocean. FAO, Rome, 76 pp.
Froese, R.
& D. Pauly (2021). Fish Base. Accessed on 12 August
2021. http://www.fishbase.org/identification/classlist.php
Haque, A.B., S.A. Das & A.R.
Biswas (2019). DNA analysis
of elasmobranch products originating from Bangladesh reveals unregulated
elasmobranch fishery and trade on species of global conservation concern. PloS one 14(9): e0222273. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222273
Infantina, J.A., R. Jayaraman, T. Umamaheswari, B.S. Viswanatha
& L. Ranjith (2016). Governance of marine fisheries in India: Special reference to Tamil
Nadu. Indian Journal of Geo Marine Sciences 45(10): 1225–1233. http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/35706
IUCN (2017). The IUCN Red List of Threatened
Species. Version 2017-3. http://www.iucnredlist.org
Joshi, K.K.,
M.P. Sreeram, P.U. Zacharia, E.M. Abdussamad,
M. Varghese, O.M.M.J.H. Mohammed & M.S. Varsha (2016). Check list of fishes of the Gulf
of Mannar ecosystem, Tamil Nadu, India. Journal of
the Marine Biological Association of India 58(1): 34–54.
http://mbai.org.in/php/journaldload.php?id=2386&bkid=115
KSCSTE
(2013). State of
Environment Report for Lakshadweep. Kerala State Council for Science,
Technology and Environment, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, 400 pp.
Misra, K.S. (1952). An aid to the identification of
fishes of India, Burma and Ceylon. I. Elasmobranchii
and Holocephali. Records of the Indian Museum
49(1): 89–137.
Nihal, D.,
N.M. Naseem, A.A. Kasim & M. Prabhakaran (2021). Anthropogenic Interventions in
the Coastal Environment–A Serious Threat to Insular Ecosystem in Kadmat Island, Lakshadweep, Southwest Coast of India. International
Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences 47(1): 71–75.
Pimm, S.L.,
C.N. Jenkins, R. Abell, T.M. Brooks, J.L Gittleman,
L.N. Joppa & J.O. Sexton (2014). The biodiversity of species and
their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection. Science
344(6187): 1246752. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1246752
Smart, J.J.,
A. Chin, A.J. Tobin, W.T. White, B. Kumasi & C.A. Simpfendorfer
(2017). Stochastic
demographic analyses of the Silvertip Shark (Carcharhinus
albimarginatus) and the Common Blacktip Shark (Carcharhinus limbatus)
from the Indo-Pacific. Fisheries Research 191: 95–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2017.03.002
Tripathy, B. (2002). Marine biodiversity of
Lakshadweep: An overview. Kachappa 7: 14–19.
Vinay, A., V.
Ramasubramanian, M. Krishnan, N.R. Kumar & A.E. Ayoob (2017). Economic analysis of tuna pole and line fisheries in
Lakshadweep. Indian Journal of Geo Marine Sciences 46(5): 947–957.
http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/41663
Vyshnavi, P., A. Samad, N. Venkatesan
& E.J. Avital (2020). A review on the energy prospects of Indian remote islands and
preliminary assessment of marine current energy potential. Journal of Physics:
Conference Series 1716(1): 012007.
Worm, B., E.B. Barbier, N. Beaumont, J.E. Duffy, C. Folke,
B.S. Halpern & R. Watson (2006). Impacts of biodiversity loss on
ocean ecosystem services. Science 314(5800): 787–790. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1132294