Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 July 2022 | 14(7): 21480–21483

 

 

ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) 

https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.7857.14.7.21480-21483

#7857 | Received 29 July 2020 | Final received 12 July 2022 | Finally accepted 15 July 2022

 

 

Salsola oppositifolia Desf. in Great Rann of Kachchh, Gujarat – a new record for India

 

Rakesh Gujar 1, Vinesh Gamit 2, Ketan Tatu 3 & R.K. Sugoor 4

 

 1–4 Gujarat Ecological Education and Research (GEER) foundation, Indroda Nature Park, P.O. Sector -7, Gandhinagar, Gujarat 382007, India.

1 gujarrakesh18@gmail.com (corresponding author), 2 vineshgamit4u@gmail.com, 3 ketantatu1@gmail.com, 4 rksugoor@yahoo.com

 

 

 

Editor: Aparna Watve, Biome Conservation Foundation, Pune, India.     Date of publication: 26 July 2022 (online & print)

 

Citation: Gujar, R., V. Gamit, K. Tatu &  R.K. Sugoor (2022). Salsola oppositifolia Desf. in Great Rann of Kachchh, Gujarat – a new record for India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 14(7): 21480–21483. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.7857.14.7.21480-21483

 

Copyright: © Gujar et al. 2022. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.  JoTT allows unrestricted use, reproduction, and distribution of this article in any medium by providing adequate credit to the author(s) and the source of publication.

 

Funding: Gujarat Forestry Research Foundation (GFRF), Gandhinagar.

 

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

 

Acknowledgements: The authors are thankful to the Gujarat Forestry Research Foundation (GFRF), Gandhinagar (Gujarat) for funding ‘Study of flora and fauna of Great Rann of Kachchh’ project.  But for this project funded by GFRF, the present plant record could not have been made. Gratitudes are also due due to the Gujarat Forest Department authorities managing Kachchh Desert Wildlife Sanctuary, Great Rann of Kachchh. Authors are also thankful to Dr. S.L. Meena (Scientist E), Botanical Survey of India, Jodhpur for species confirmation. The first two authors are thankful to Jigar Joshi, SRF, GEER Foundation and other team members of project for accompanying during the field. Authors are also thankful to research staff of GEER Foundation who helped during the study.

 

 

 

The genus Salsola, usually having small shrubby habit, commonly occurs in arid, semi-arid, and temperate regions of the world (Rasheed et al. 2013; Hanif et al. 2018). There are 100–150 species of this genus in the world (Altay & Ozturk 2020). The genus is characterized by the presence of axillary flowers with conspicuous bracteoles, winged fruit, and superior ovary (Borger et al. 2008). The name Salsola is derived from the Latin word ‘Salsus’ meaning ‘salty’ (Mosyakin 1996). Salsola taxon belongs to Salsola sect and it is distributed across Mediterranean region mostly prevalent from Morocco to Palestine (Botschantzev 1976; Greuter et al. 1984; Peruzzi & Passlacqua 2004). In India, five species of Salsola are recoded: Salsola kali, S. hartmanii, S. monoptera, Caroxylon imbricatum, Halogeton glomeratus. Among them, the latter two are more well-known through the synonyms Salsola baryosma and Salsola glomerata, respectively (BSI 2022; FOI 2022). They are recorded from different states of India like Rajasthan, Kashmir, Ladakh, Gujarat, Delhi, Haryana, and Punjab. They are used as fodder in many parts of the country (Altay & Ozturk 2020).

A hitherto unrecorded species of halophyte, Salsola oppositifolia Desf., belonging to the family Amaranthaceae was recorded in the Great Rann of Kachchh (Kachchh district, Gujarat) in October 2021 during a study on flora and fauna of Great Rann of Kachchh by Gujarat Ecological Education and Research (GEER) Foundation. Salsola oppositifolia was recorded in three different localities of Great Rann of Kachchh between August 2021 and December 2021.  This species constitutes a new record for India. The specimen was confirmed by a scientist at Botanical Survey of India (BSI), Jodhpur. The sample is deposited at BSI, Jodhpur (Accession No.: BSJO51890). Great Rann of Kachchh is the largest saline desert-cum-seasonal wetland in Gujarat, which is spread over an area of around 18,000 km2. It is important not only due to vast area, but also owing to some of its unique aspects like its dual ecosystem characteristic (i.e., saline desert-cum-seasonal wetland), unique genesis, evolution, and presence on hilly islands (‘bets’). The Great Rann has been identified as one of the eight nationally important wetlands in Gujarat by MoEFCC. A large portion of it is under legal protection as a wildlife sanctuary named as Kachchh Desert Wildlife Sanctuary. ‘Flamingo city’ within the Great Rann is an important bird and biodiversity area (IBA).

Salsola oppositifolia Desf., Fl. Atl. 1: 219 (1798); Salsola longifolia Forsskal var. oppositifolia (Desf.) Viciosa in Anal. Jard. Bot. Madrid 6(2): 25 (1946); Seidlitzia oppositifolia (Desf.) Iljin in Bot. Mater. Bot. Inst. Komarova Akad. Nauk. SSSR 16: 88 (1954). (Image 1)

Description: Perrenial, succulent, shrub, 1–2 m tall, branches are not jointed. Stem erect, 5–10 mm diameter, branched with opposite branches, glabrous, cylindrical, woody base, rarely prostate, stipules absent. Leaves upto 20–30 mm, cylindrical to terrete, decurrent, sheathing at base and adanate to stem, ramal, opposite (two leaves at each node), ramal, opposite (two leaves at each node), 6–10 x 2–3 mm in size, sessile or amplexicaul, tip acute or pointed, subulate lips, apiculate depressed above. Flowers are axillary and solitary, hermaphrodite. Bracts linear to oblong, keeled, sessile, lower bract larger, clavate to dumb-bell shaped. Bracteoles are acute, linear to oblong about 3–4 mm long and 0.5-0.8 mm broad. Perianth ovoid, 15–20 mm in diameter, yellowish, fructiferous t. Tepals 4–5 mm long, 2–3 mm wide elliptical, rounded apex and undulate margin. Stamens 4–5, 1–2 mm long, exerted. Anther tetragonal and two styles. Staminodes are absent. Fruits are winged, homogeneous, about 10–15 mm broad. Wings 2–3 mm, orbicular, unequal (two smaller and three bigger). The smaller wings are about 4–6 mm wide while bigger wings are 9–10 mm wide. Seed is horizontal and covered with smooth membrane.

 

(Dichotomous Key)

 

1a) Annual herb, leaves and bracts spinose or aspinose at the apex .......................... 2

 

2a) Plant erect or prostrate,  Leaves and bracts spinose at the apex .......................... 3

 

3a) Plant erect, Spines long upto 1–2 cm or more ............................................. Salsola kali

 

3b) Plant prostrate, Spines short less than 1 mm ............................................... Salsola monoptera

 

2b) Plant erect or prostrate, Leaves and bracts aspinose at the apex ........................... 4

 

4a) Plant erect, Stem curved .... Salsola glomerata

 

4b) Plant prostrate ................... Salsola hartmanii

 

1b) Shrubs, leaves and bracts without spines …………….... 5

 

5a) Leaves alternate, stem hairy ....................................................... Salsola baryozoma

 

5b) Leaves opposite, stem glabrous ......................................................... Salsola oppositifolia

 

Flowering and Fruiting: October–January

Habitat: It was often found in association with Sueada nudiflora. It was recorded on muddy bunds and on the hilly outcrops.

Distribution:  Italy, northern Africa, Palestine, Spain, western Sahara (Brullo 1982; Peruzzi & Passalacqua 2004).

Conservation status as per IUCN Red Data List of Threatened Species: Not Evaluated (NE).

Taxonomic notes: Salsola oppositifolia species was first described by Desfontaines in 1798 (Brullo 1982). In early 1800, this species was considered to be identical to Salsola longifolia and S. verticillata (Fiori 1923; Maire 1962; Zohary 1966). But later on, it was proved that three species are completely distinct from one another. Salsola longifolia and S. verticillata was kept in Darniella (Maire & Weller) Brullo. Sect while S. oppositifolia was kept in Coccosalsola Fenzl. sect. of Salsola (Brullo 1982, 1984). Out of the six species of Salsola recorded in India, four species are distinct in one or another morphological characters like herbaceous habit, presence of spines, and prostrate stem. The only species having a close resemblance with Salsola oppositifolia is Salsola baryozoma. On close observation of characters of the two taxa, it was found that both the taxa are morphologically different. This species (= Salsola oppositifolia) was not recorded in India. In India, Salsola baryozoma is most commonly occuring species of this genus. Salsola baryozoma recorded in India has alternate leaves and hairy stem, while S. oppositifolia has opposite whorl of leaves and glabrous stem. Both are branched though.

Specimen examined: Tunisia, 06.x.1981, Brullo, S., Fl005525(FI); Spain, Canary Island, Tenerife, La Orotava, 28.291N, 16.629W, 2,481m, 01.xii.1985, Bourgeu, K000243929 (RBGK); India, Gujarat, Kutch, Khadir bet, 23.818N, 70.328E, 15.5 m, 24.viii.2021, Vinesh Gamit & Rakesh Gujar GRK002 (GEERF) (Image 2).

 

For images - - click here (for full PDF)

 

 

References

 

Altay, V. & M. Ozturk (2020). The genera Salsola and Suaeda (Amaranthaceae) and their value as fodder, pp. 1–12. In: Grigore, M.N. (ed.). Handbook of Halophytes. Springer, 1190 pp.

Borger, C.P., G. Yan, J.K. Scott, M.J. Walsh & S.B. Powles (2008). Salsola tragus or S. australis (Chenopodiaceae) in Australia-untangling taxonomic confusion through molecular and cytological analyses. Australian Journal of Botany 56(7): 600–608.

Botanical Survey of India (2022). Checklist of Plants of India. https://efloraindia.bsi.gov.in/eFlora/speciesList_PCL.action?resultType=genusWise&parent_Id=25674&parent_Name=salsola. Accessed on 19 May 2022.

Botschantzev, V. (1976). Conspectus specierum sectionis Coccosalsola Fenzl generis Salsola L. Novosti Sistematiki Vysshikh Rastenii  (Leningrad) 13: 74–102.

Brullo, S. (1982). Notes on the genus Salsola (Chenopodiaceae). 1. The Salsola oppositifolia and S. longifolia groups. Willdenowia 12: 241–247.

Brullo, S. (1984). Taxonomic consideration on the genus Darniella (Chenopodiaceae). Webbia 38: 301–328.

Fiori, A. (1923). Nuova Flora analitica d’Italica, - Firenze,  Forgotten book publisher, England, 958 pp.

Greuter, W., H.M. Burdet & G. Long (eds.). (1984). Med-Checklist 1. Conservatoire et Jardin Botaniques de la Ville de Geneve, Geneve & Berlin.

Hanif, Z., H.H. Ali, G. Rasool, A. Tanveer & B.S. Chauhan (2018). Genus Salsola: Its benefits, uses, environmental perspectives and future aspects – a review. Journal of Rangeland Science 8(3): 315–328.

Maire, R. (1962). Flore de I’ Afrique du Nord, 8. Encyclopédie Biologique 59, Paris, 333 pp.

Mosyakin, S.L. (1996). A taxonomic synopsis of the genus Salsola (Chenopodiaceae) in North America. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 83: 387–395.

Peruzzi, L. & N.G. Passalacqua (2004). On the lectotypification of the names of four species described by Desfontaines reported for Calabria (S. Italy). Taxon 53(2): 543–547.

Rasheed, D.M., S.M. El Zalabani, M.A. Koheil, H.M. El-Hefnawy & M.A. Farag (2013). Metabolite profiling driven analysis of Salsola species and their anti-acetylcholin esterase potential. Natural Product Research 27(24): 2320–2327.

Zohary, M. (1966). Flora Palaestina, 1., Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Jerusalem, 403 pp.