Journal of Threatened
Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 November 2022 | 14(11): 22164–22178
ISSN 0974-7907
(Online) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Print)
https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.7715.14.11.22164-22178
#7715 | Received 19
October 2021 | Final received 06 August 2022 | Finally accepted 12 November
2022
An annotated checklist of odonates of Amboli-Chaukul-Parpoli
region showing new records for the Maharashtra State, India with updated state
checklist
Dattaprasad Sawant 1, Hemant Ogale 2 & Rakesh Mahadev Deulkar
3
1 M.D. Community Medicine, Seth GS
Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400012, India.
2 1040, Whistling Woods, Amboli, Sindhudurg, Maharashtra 416510, India.
3 87, Bazarwadi,
Amboli, Sindhudurg, Maharashtra 416510, India.
1,2 Indian Foundation for
Butterflies, in National Centre for Biological Sciences, Rajiv Gandhi Nagar, Kodigehalli, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560097, India.
1 dattaprasad.101@gmail.com
(corresponding author), 2 hvogale@gmail.com, 3 rakeshdeulkar5@gmail.com
Editor: Ashish D. Tiple, Vidyabharati college,
Wardha, India. Date of publication:
26 November 2022 (online & print)
Citation: Sawant, D., H. Ogale & R.M. Deulkar (2022). An annotated checklist of odonates of Amboli-Chaukul-Parpoli
region showing new records for the Maharashtra State, India with updated state
checklist. Journal of
Threatened Taxa 14(11): 22164–22178. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.7715.14.11.22164–22178
Copyright: © Sawant et al. 2022. Creative Commons Attribution
4.0 International License. JoTT allows unrestricted use, reproduction, and
distribution of this article in any medium by providing adequate credit to the
author(s) and the source of publication.
Funding: This is a self
funded study.
Competing interests: The authors
declare no competing interests.
Author details: Dattaprasad Sawant is a Doctor by profession
and completed his MD in Preventive and Social Medicine. He is a self taught photographer
and discovered three odonata species new to science. Hemant Ogale is a renowned butterfly and dragonfly expert and a master in
micro photography. He has studied
butterflies across the Western Ghats which resulted in documenting more than 100+
butterfly life cycles, several
new host plant records and range extensions.Rakesh Mahadev Deulkar
is a naturalist based in Amboli,
Sindhudurg district, Maharashtra.
He completed his masters in biodiversity.
He is a kin bird, butterfly and
odonata watcher with good photography
skills.
Author contributions:
All the three authors equally
contributed in field surveys,
odonata identification,
data compilation, specimen collection
and manuscript preparation.
Acknowledgements: We are grateful to Nikhil Gaitonde, Pratiksha Naik, Sonali Ogale, and Srujan Ogale for their invaluable
support in field surveys and logistics. We are also grateful to Shantanu Joshi
for providing assistance in preserving collected specimens at NCBS, Bengaluru.
Abstract: Amboli region, consisting Amboli, Chaukul, Nene, and Parpoli villages is one of the biodiversity rich areas in
northern Western Ghats. We opportunistically surveyed odonates
from the region and prepared an annotated checklist of 93 species belonging to
12 families. We report 15 Western Ghats endemic species and six new records for
the State of Maharashtra. We further present an updated checklist of Odonata of
Maharashtra state with a total of 144 species.
Keywords: Anisoptera, biodiversity, range
extension, Sindhudurg, Western Ghats, taxonomy, zygoptera.
Introduction
The Western Ghats mountain range
runs parallel to the west coast of peninsular India. The high human population
density, changing use of landscape, pollution, natural disasters like
landslides, increased anthropogenic interference and climate change have a
negative impact in conserving biodiversity of this region. The Western Ghats
has been thoroughly surveyed for odonates. Fraser
(1933, 1934, 1936) and many others did comprehensive documentation in this
region. Subramanian & Babu (2020) made a
checklist of 196 odonates species of Western Ghats
with Kerala having the most number of species. Regarding Maharashtra state, Tiple & Koparde (2015)
recorded 134 species (see discussion). After that many species have been added
to the list of Maharashtra with no formal efforts to compile them.
Amboli region is considered as one of
the most biodiverse regions in Maharashtra with semi-evergreen forest and heavy
rainfall (Satose et al. 2018). Amboli
region consists of Amboli, Chaukul,
Nene, and Parpoli villages, out of which Parpoli is located at the foothills of Western Ghats and
remaining are located at the high altitude (100─1,100 m). The landscape around Amboli is heterogenous with patches of evergreen forest,
riparian habitats, open lateritic plateaus with grasslands, and moist deciduous
forests at mid and low elevations. Due to the unique location at the junction
of northern and central Western Ghats with drastic variation in habitats, Amboli region harbors many spectacular odonate
species. However, no attempt was made to document the Odonata fauna of this
region. We surveyed Amboli region for two years and
here we present an annotated checklist of 93 odonates
with six new records for Maharashtra state. We also update the checklist of
Maharashtra, which now contains 144 species.
Material
and Methods
We opportunistically surveyed Amboli-Chaukul-Parpoli region of Sawantwadi
Taluka, Sindhudurg District from August 2019 to August 2021 for odonates. Details of survey locations are given in Table 1
with photographs in Image 1. We photographed odonates
and collected a few individuals from non-protected areas for the purpose of
identification. All collected specimens are deposited in Research Collections,
National Centre for Biological Sciences (NCBS), Bangalore, India (details of
all specimens are given in Table 2). Field photographs were taken with DSLR
cameras and macro lenses (Canon Inc. and Nikon Inc., Japan). We identified odonates based on the Fraser (1933, 1934, 1936);
Subramanian et al. (2018). Systematic arrangement of the species follows Kalkman et al. (2020). As the subspecies status of some
species remains unresolved, the present checklist is up to the species level.
Abbreviations in the text: S1–S10 = abdominal segments 1–10. Maps are created
with QGIS v3.10.2 and Google Maps © 2021. Distribution maps are based on the
data given by Subramanian et al. (2018) and Anonymous (2021a, 2021b, 2021c).
Results
and Discussion
We recorded a total of 93 odonates belonging to 12 families, with family Libellulidae having the highest number of species (38
species), followed by family Coenagrionidae (20
species) (see Table 6; Images 2─6). Detailed checklist of odonates
with their International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List of
Threatened Species status is given in Table 3. According to IUCN Red List
Version 2021─2, one species is Vulnerable (VU), one is Near Threatened (NT),
and six are Data Deficient (DD). Out of 93 species, 15 species are endemic to
the Western Ghats (Subramanian et al. 2018; Kalkman
et al. 2020; Bhakare et al. 2021). We also report six
species for the first time in Maharashtra State which are the northernmost
range extensions for the respective species (see Table 4; Image 7). Taxonomical
and distributional notes on these six species are as follows:
Protosticta
sanguinostigma Fraser, 1922. Hemant Ogale
photographed this Western Ghats endemic damselfly in a hill stream of Nene
village on 6.vi.2021 (Image 2c). Three males were observed resting in bushes
out of which one male was collected. It was identified by a robust, pointed
spine of cerci (Image 2d); brown synthorax with
bluish stripes, and blue mark on S8 with narrow black line on dorsum. Earlier,
the species was known from Goa, Karnataka, Kerala, and Tamil Nadu (Subramanian
et al. 2018). Thus, P. sanguinostigma is
reported from Maharashtra state for the first time with distribution range
extension in northern Western Ghats (Image 7b).
Cyclogomphus
flavoannulatus Rangnekar
et al., 2019. Hemant Ogale photographed a small sized female Gomphid in Amboli on 02.x.2011. The species was identified as C. flavoannulatus female based on absence of yellow
‘Y’-shaped mark on synthorax and basal yellow annular
rings on abdominal segments (Image 4h). The species was known from Kerala and
Goa (Rangnekar et al. 2019). This observation is the
first record from Maharashtra state with distributional range extension for the
species (Image 7c).
Megalogomphus
hannyngtoni (Fraser, 1923). Hemant Ogale
photographed a large sized male Gomphid in Amboli on
9.vi.2021. It was identified by its large size; long and sharp pointed caudal
appendages with ‘sabre’-like appearance; apple green markings on black synthorax, and prominent yellow markings on S8─10 (Image
4l). This ‘Near Threatened’ Western Ghats endemic dragonfly was earlier known
from Goa, Karnataka, Kerala, and Odisha (Subramanian 2011; Subramanian et al.
2018). Present record is the first from Maharashtra state and also extends the
distribution range of M. hannyngtoni (Image
7d).
Melligomphus
acinaces (Laidlaw, 1922). Hemant Ogale
photographed a male of medium sized Gomphid, resting on rocks in Parpoli stream on 30.xi.2019. It was easily identified by
its ‘claw’-like caudal appendages with paraprocts
longer than cerci (Image 4m). Koparde et al. (2014)
recorded similar individuals from Parpoli and Verle villages. They wrongly identified the species as Lamelligomphus nilgiriensis
(= Onychogomphus nilgiriensis).
Tiple & Koparde (2015)
retained the same record in the checklist of Maharashtra. After close
examination of photographs provided by Koparde et al.
(2014), we identified the male as M. acinaces.
Dattaprasad Sawant photographed a male in Shahapur Taluka, Thane District in 2018 which is another
record of this species in Maharashtra state. Earlier the species was known from
Gujrat, Karnataka, and Kerala (Rathod et al. 2016; Subramanian et al. 2018)
(Image 7e). Our records fill the distribution gap for M. acinaces.
Epithemis mariae (Laidlaw, 1915). Hemant Ogale
and Dattaprasad Sawant observed many individuals of E.
mariae in Amboli, Chakul and Nene villages (Image 5g). This medium sized Libellulid can be easily identified by its bright red coloured proximal abdominal segments. This Western Ghats
endemic dragonfly was reported by Sathe & Bhusnar (2010) from Kolhapur, but omitted by Tiple & Koparde (2015) due to
absence of taxonomic identity or spatial distribution. Here we confirmed its
presence in Maharashtra state with photographic evidence (Image 7f). The species
can be easily seen in riverine habitats from mid-August to October.
Idionyx saffronata Fraser, 1924. Hemant Ogale
collected a pair of Idionyx sp. from Amboli on 10.vi.2021 (Image 6p). Later it was confirmed as I.
saffronata based on the shape of caudal
appendages of male. Paraprocts are trifid with a
broad apical portion (Image 6q). Genus Idionyx
is distributed till Goa state in the Western Ghats but not reported from
Maharashtra state (Subramanian et al. 2018). We confirm the presence of I. saffronata in Maharashtra with distributional range
extension for the species (Image 7g).
Despite being one of the most
biodiverse regions in the northern Western Ghats, no efforts were taken for
documentation of Odonata fauna of Amboli-Chaukul-Parpoli
region. Due to the unique location of Amboli, it was
speculated to have many endemic odonates. Out of
total number of species we reported, ~16% are endemic to the Western Ghats,
highlighting the rich biodiversity of the region with need of conservation of
natural habitat. Western Ghats and adjacent areas in Sindhudurg district are
facing tremendous anthropogenic pressure in the form of habitat loss. Change in
existing landscape may lead to the disappearance of species which are extremely
seasonal and localized in a small geographic area.
Maharashtra state has varied
biogeography due to which it harbors several species of flora and fauna. The
state has been thoroughly studied in terms of odonates.
Tipale & Koparde (2015)
combined various checklists and made a comprehensive database of odonates. They recorded a total of 134 species from 11
families. Since then, many species have been reported and discovered from
Maharashtra. Table 4 gives detailed information of species added to Odonata
fauna of Maharashtra. Citizen Science platforms such as Indian Odonata have
contributed for understanding the distribution range of many odonates (Joshi et al. 2021). However, due to some
taxonomic changes, a few species are omitted from the Odonata checklist. Details
about such species and the reason for omission is given in Table 5. Hence the
updated Odonata checklist of Maharashtra has 144 species from 13 families.
Table 6 shows the taxonomic breakup with families arranged as per Kalkman et al. (2020).
Odonates are freshwater insects and need
stable microhabitat for reproduction. The Western Ghats including Amboli region is now under constant threat of habitat loss
resulting from anthropogenic activities. Systematic surveys are needed to
document the overall biodiversity of this unique landscape which will
ultimately help to make appropriate habitat conservation plans.
Table 1. Survey locations (all
locations fall in Sawantwadi Taluka, Sindhudurg
District, Maharashtra).
|
|
Location |
Latitude |
Longitude |
Altitude (in meter) |
Habitat |
|
01 |
Amboli |
15.9647 °N |
74.0036 °E |
690 |
High altitude streams, wetlands
and seasonal ponds |
|
02 |
Chaukul |
15.9283 °N |
74.0388 °E |
800 |
High altitude streams, wetlands
and plateau lake |
|
03 |
Dabhil |
15.8969 °N |
73.9330 °E |
190 |
Low altitude forested stream |
|
04 |
Nene |
15.926 0°N |
74.0223 °E |
800 |
High altitude riverine habitat |
|
05 |
Parpoli |
15.9542 °N |
73.9771 °E |
100 |
Low altitude forested stream |
Table 2. Details of collected
specimens.
|
|
Specimen deposited at |
Voucher code |
Species |
Sex |
Preservation method |
|
01 |
NCBS |
BN825 |
Protosticta sanguinostigma |
Male |
Dry only |
|
02 |
NCBS |
BN806 |
Euphaea thosegharensis |
Male |
Dry only |
|
03 |
NCBS |
BN805 |
Bradinopyga konkanensis |
Male |
Dry only |
|
04 |
NCBS |
BN807 |
Idionyx saffronata |
Male |
Dry only |
|
05 |
NCBS |
BN808 |
Idionyx saffronata |
Female |
Dry only |
|
06 |
NCBS |
BN827 |
Macromidia donaldi |
Male |
Dry only |
|
07 |
NCBS |
BN828 |
Macromidia donaldi |
Female |
Dry only |
Table 3. Checklist of odonates of Amboli-Chaukul-Parpoli
region, Sindhudurg District.
|
|
Scientific name |
Authority |
IUCN Red List status |
Image |
|
|
Suborder: Zygoptera
Selys, 1854 |
|||
|
|
Family: Lestidae
Calvert, 1901 |
|||
|
01 |
Lestes concinnus |
Hagen in Selys,
1862 |
LC |
- |
|
02 |
Lestes elatus |
Hagen in Selys,
1862 |
LC |
2a |
|
03 |
Lestes viridulus |
Rambur, 1842 |
LC |
2b |
|
|
Family: Platystictidae
Kennedy, 1920 |
|||
|
04 |
Protosticta sanguinostigma*# |
Fraser, 1922 |
VU |
2c-d |
|
|
Family: Calopterygidae
Selys, 1850 |
|||
|
05 |
Neurobasis chinensis |
(Linnaeus, 1758) |
LC |
2e |
|
06 |
Vestalis apicalis |
Selys, 1873 |
LC |
2f |
|
07 |
Vestalis gracilis |
(Rambur, 1842) |
LC |
2g |
|
|
Family: Chlorocyphidae
Cowley, 1937 |
|||
|
08 |
Heliocypha bisignata |
(Hagen in Selys,
1853) |
LC |
2h |
|
09 |
Libellago indica |
(Fraser, 1928) |
NE |
2i |
|
|
Family: Euphaeidae
Yakobson & Bainchi,
1905 |
|||
|
10 |
Euphaea fraseri# |
(Laidlaw, 1920) |
LC |
2j |
|
11 |
Euphaea pseudodispar# |
Sadasivan & Bhakare, 2021 |
NE |
2k |
|
12 |
Euphaea thosegharensis# |
Sadasivan & Bhakare, 2021 |
NE |
2l |
|
|
Family: Platycnemididae
Yakobson & Bainchi,
1905 |
|||
|
13 |
Caconeura ramburi |
(Fraser, 1922) |
DD |
2m |
|
14 |
Copera marginipes |
(Rambur, 1842) |
LC |
2n |
|
15 |
Copera vittata |
Selys, 1863 |
LC |
2o |
|
16 |
Disparoneura quadrimaculata |
(Rambur, 1842) |
LC |
2p |
|
17 |
Elattoneura tetrica# |
(Laidlaw, 1917) |
LC |
2q |
|
18 |
Prodasineura verticalis |
(Selys,
1860) |
LC |
2r |
|
|
Family: Coenagrionidae
Kirby, 1890 |
|||
|
19 |
Aciagrion approximans |
Fraser, 1921 |
LC |
3a |
|
20 |
Aciagrion occidentale |
Laidlaw, 1919 |
LC |
3b |
|
21 |
Aciagrion pallidum |
Selys, 1891 |
LC |
3c |
|
22 |
Agriocnemis pieris |
Laidlaw, 1919 |
LC |
3d |
|
23 |
Agriocnemis pygmaea |
(Rambur, 1842) |
LC |
3e |
|
24 |
Agriocnemis splendidissima |
Laidlaw, 1919 |
LC |
3f |
|
25 |
Amphiallagma parvum |
Selys, 1876 |
LC |
3g |
|
26 |
Ceriagrion cerinorubellum |
(Brauer,
1865) |
LC |
3h |
|
27 |
Ceriagrion chromothorax# |
Joshi & Sawant 2019 |
NE |
3i |
|
28 |
Ceriagrion coromandelianum |
(Fabricius,
1798) |
LC |
3j |
|
29 |
Ceriagrion olivaceum |
Laidlaw, 1914 |
LC |
3k |
|
30 |
Ceriagrion rubiae |
Laidlaw, 1916 |
NE |
3l |
|
31 |
Ischnura rubilio |
Selys, 1876 |
LC |
3m |
|
32 |
Ischnura senegalensis |
Rambur, 1842 |
LC |
3n |
|
33 |
Mortonagrion varralli |
Fraser, 1920 |
LC |
3o |
|
34 |
Pseudagrion decorum |
Rambur, 1842 |
LC |
3p |
|
35 |
Pseudagrion indicum# |
Fraser, 1924 |
LC |
3q |
|
36 |
Pseudagrion malabaricum |
Fraser, 1924 |
LC |
3r |
|
37 |
Pseudagrion microcephalum |
(Rambur, 1842) |
LC |
4a |
|
38 |
Pseudagrion rubriceps |
Selys, 1876 |
LC |
4b |
|
|
Suborder Anisoptera
Selys, 1854 |
|||
|
|
Family: Aeshnidae
Leach, 1815 |
|||
|
39 |
Anaciaeschna jaspidea |
(Burmeister, 1839) |
LC |
- |
|
40 |
Anax ephippiger |
(Burmeister, 1839) |
LC |
4c |
|
41 |
Anax guttatus |
(Burmeister, 1839) |
LC |
4d |
|
42 |
Anax immaculifrons |
Rambur, 1842 |
LC |
4e |
|
43 |
Gynacantha dravida |
Lieftinck, 1960 |
LC |
4f |
|
44 |
Gynacantha millardi |
Fraser, 1920 |
LC |
4g |
|
|
Family: Gomphidae
Rambur, 184 |
|||
|
45 |
Cyclogomphus flavoannulatus*# |
Rangnekar et al 2019 |
NE |
4h |
|
46 |
Gomphidia kodaguensis# |
Fraser, 1923 |
DD |
4i |
|
47 |
Ictinogomphus rapax |
(Rambur, 1842) |
LC |
4j |
|
48 |
Macrogomphus wynaadicus# |
Fraser, 1924 |
DD |
4k |
|
49 |
Megalogomphus hannyngtoni*# |
(Fraser, 1923) |
NT |
4l |
|
50 |
Melligomphus acinaces*# |
(Laidlaw, 1922) |
DD |
4m |
|
51 |
Paragomphus lineatus |
(Selys,
1850) |
LC |
4n |
|
|
Family: Macromiidae
Needham, 1903 |
|||
|
52 |
Epophthalmia vittata |
Burmeister, 1839 |
LC |
4o |
|
53 |
Macromia cingulata |
Rambur, 1842 |
LC |
4p |
|
|
Family: Libellulidae
Leach, 1815 |
|||
|
54 |
Acisoma panorpoides |
Rambur, 1842 |
LC |
4q |
|
55 |
Brachydiplax sobrina |
Rambur, 1842 |
LC |
- |
|
56 |
Brachythemis contaminata |
(Fabricius,
1793) |
LC |
4r |
|
57 |
Bradinopyga geminata |
(Rambur, 1842) |
LC |
5a |
|
58 |
Bradinopyga konkanensis |
Joshi & Sawant, 2020 |
NE |
5b |
|
59 |
Cratilla lineata |
(Brauer,
1878) |
LC |
5c |
|
60 |
Crocothemis servilia |
(Drury, 1770) |
LC |
5d |
|
61 |
Diplacodes lefebvrii |
(Rambur, 1842) |
LC |
5e |
|
62 |
Diplacodes trivialis |
(Rambur, 1842) |
LC |
5f |
|
63 |
Epithemis mariae*# |
(Laidlaw, 1915) |
LC |
5g |
|
64 |
Hylaeothemis apicalis |
Fraser, 1926 |
DD |
5h |
|
65 |
Indothemis carnatica |
Fabricius, 1798 |
LC |
- |
|
66 |
Lathrecista asiatica |
(Fabricius,
1798) |
LC |
5i |
|
67 |
Neurothemis fulvia |
(Drury, 1773) |
LC |
5j |
|
68 |
Neurothemis intermedia |
(Rambur, 1842) |
LC |
5k |
|
69 |
Neurothemis tullia |
(Drury, 1773) |
LC |
5l |
|
70 |
Onychothemis testacea |
Laidlaw, 1902 |
LC |
5m |
|
71 |
Orthetrum chrysis |
(Selys,
1891) |
LC |
5n |
|
72 |
Orthetrum glaucum |
(Brauer,
1865) |
LC |
5o |
|
73 |
Orthetrum luzonicum |
(Brauer,
1868) |
LC |
5p |
|
74 |
Orthetrum pruinosum |
(Burmeister, 1839) |
LC |
5q |
|
75 |
Orthetrum sabina |
(Drury, 1770) |
LC |
5r |
|
76 |
Orthetrum taeniolatum |
(Schneider, 1845) |
LC |
6a |
|
77 |
Orthetrum triangulare |
(Selys,
1878) |
LC |
6b |
|
78 |
Palpopleura sexmaculata |
(Fabricius,
1787) |
LC |
6c |
|
79 |
Pantala flavescens |
(Fabricius,
1798) |
LC |
6d |
|
80 |
Potamarcha congener |
(Rambur, 1842) |
LC |
6e |
|
81 |
Rhodothemis rufa |
(Rambur, 1842) |
LC |
- |
|
82 |
Tetrathemis platyptera |
Selys, 1878 |
LC |
6f |
|
83 |
Tholymis tillarga |
(Fabricius,
1798) |
LC |
6g |
|
84 |
Tramea basilaris |
(Palisot
de Beauvois, 1805) |
LC |
6h |
|
85 |
Tramea limbata |
(Desjardins, 1832) |
LC |
6i |
|
86 |
Trithemis aurora |
(Burmeister, 1839) |
LC |
6j |
|
87 |
Trithemis festiva |
(Rambur, 1842) |
LC |
6k |
|
88 |
Trithemis kirbyi |
Selys, 1891 |
LC |
6l |
|
89 |
Trithemis pallidinervis |
(Kirby, 1889) |
LC |
6m |
|
90 |
Zygonix iris |
Selys, 1869 |
LC |
6n |
|
91 |
Zyxomma petiolatum |
Rambur, 1842 |
LC |
6o |
|
|
Genera incertae
sedis |
|||
|
92 |
Idionyx saffronata*# |
Fraser, 1924 |
DD |
6p-q |
|
93 |
Macromidia donaldi# |
(Fraser, 1924) |
LC |
6r |
DD—Data Deficient | LC—Least
Concern | NE—Not Evaluated | NT—Near Threatened | VU—Vulnerable | *—New records
for the Maharashtra State | #—Species endemic to Western Ghats.
Table 4. List of Odonata species
added in the checklist of Maharashtra since 2015.
|
|
Species |
Family |
Reference |
|
01 |
Lestes concinnus Hagen in Selys, 1862 |
Lestidae |
Dow (2017); Anonymous (2021d) |
|
02 |
Lestes patricia Fraser, 1924 |
Lestidae |
Bhakare et al. (2020) |
|
03 |
Lestes praemorsus Hagen in Selys, 1862 |
Lestidae |
Mujumdar et al. (2020); Koli et al. (2021) |
|
04 |
Platylestes platystylus Rambur, 1842 |
Lestidae |
Mujumdar et al. (2020) |
|
05 |
Protosticta sanguinostigma Fraser, 1922 |
Platystictidae |
Present Study |
|
06 |
Libellago indica (Fraser, 1928) |
Chlorocyphidae |
Subramanian et al. (2018);
Present Study |
|
07 |
Euphaea pseudodispar Sadasivan & Bhakare, 2021 |
Euphaeidae |
Bhakare et al. (2021);
Present Study |
|
08 |
Euphaea thosegharensis Sadasivan
& Bhakare, 2021 |
Euphaeidae |
Bhakare et al. (2021);
Present Study |
|
09 |
Dysphaea ethela Fraser, 1924 |
Euphaeidae |
Personal observations by Dattaprasad Sawant at Hadpid, Devgad Taluka, Maharashtra. |
|
10 |
Melanoneura bilineata Fraser, 1922 |
Platycnemididae |
Koli and Dalvi (2021) |
|
11 |
Aciagrion approximans (Selys, 1876) |
Coenagrionidae |
Subramanian et al. (2018);
Present Study |
|
12 |
Agriocnemis keralensis Peters, 1981 |
Coenagrionidae |
Koli et al. (2021) |
|
13 |
Ceriagrion chromothorax Joshi & Sawant 2019 |
Coenagrionidae |
Joshi and Sawant (2019) |
|
14 |
Ischnura rubilio Selys, 1876 |
Coenagrionidae |
Subramanian et al. (2018);
Present Study |
|
15 |
Gynacantha khasiaca MacLachlan, 1896 |
Aeshnidae |
Mujumdar et al. (2020); Koli et al. (2021) |
|
16 |
Cyclogomphus flavoannulatus Rangnekar et al 2019 |
Gomphidae |
Present Study |
|
17 |
Merogomphus longistigma Fraser, 1922 |
Gomphidae |
Payra et al. (2022) |
|
18 |
Megalogomphus hannyngtoni (Fraser, 1923) |
Gomphidae |
Present Study |
|
19 |
Melligomphus acinaces (Laidlaw, 1922) |
Gomphidae |
Present Study |
|
20 |
Bradinopyga konkanensis Joshi & Sawant, 2020 |
Libellulidae |
Joshi and Sawant (2019);
Present Study |
|
21 |
Epithemis mariae (Laidlaw, 1915) |
Libellulidae |
Present Study |
|
22 |
Hylaeothemis apicalis Fraser, 1926 |
Libellulidae |
Subramanian et al. (2018);
Present Study |
|
23 |
Macrodiplax cora (Brauer, 1867) |
Libellulidae |
Anonymous (2021e) |
|
24 |
Idionyx saffronata Fraser, 1924 |
Genera incertae
sedis |
Present Study |
|
25 |
Macromidia donaldi (Fraser, 1924) |
Genera incertae
sedis |
Payra et al. (2022);
Present Study. Payra et al. (2022)
enlisted this species in family Synthemistidae.
However Kalkman et al. (2020) consider this species
to be belonged to Genera incertae sedis. |
Table 5. List of Odonata species
omitted from the checklist of Maharashtra due to various reasons.
|
|
Species |
Family |
Reason |
|
01 |
Lestes thoracicus (Laidlaw, 1920) |
Lestidae |
Dumont et al. (2017)
synonymized L. thoracicus with L. concinnus. |
|
02 |
Lestes umbrinus (Selys, 1891) |
Lestidae |
Dumont et al. (2017)
synonymized L. umbrinus with L. concinnus. |
|
03 |
Aciagrion hisopa (Selys, 1876) |
Coenagrionidae |
Joshi et al. (2016) showed that
taxon krishna belongs to A. approximans and not to A. hisopa.
Hence we include A. approximans in updated
checklist |
|
04 |
Cercion dyeri (Fraser, 1920) |
Coenagrionidae |
Weeker & Dumont
(2004) synonymized C. dyeri with Paracercion calamorum. |
|
05 |
Ischnura aurora (Brauer, 1865) |
Coenagrionidae |
Papazian et al. (2007) showed I.
a. aurora is found in Australia and I. a. rubilio
is found in the Indian Subcontinent and Iran. Kalkman
et al. (2020) consider I. rubilio as a
complete species. |
|
06 |
Anax imperator (Leach, 1815) |
Aeshnidae |
Tiple & Koparde (2015) listed A. imperator from Nashik
without any photographic or specimen evidence. However, it is distributed in
Africa, Europe and North India. This record needs to be confirmed with either
photo or specimen. |
|
07 |
Anormogomphus heteropterus (Selys,
1854) |
Gomphidae |
Babu et al. (2009)
recorded a female Gomphid from Aurangabad, Maharashtra and identified it as A.
heteropterus. However, no male individual has
been reported from the state since then. This species occurs in North India
with no records from Western Ghats and nearby regions. Hence until the record
of male individuals, we omit this species from the checklist of Maharashtra. |
|
08 |
Asiagomphus nilgiricus (Laidlaw, 1922) |
Gomphidae |
Sathe & Bhusnar (2010) mentioned A. nilgiricus
without any specimen or photographic evidence from Amba Reserve Forest.
However, Subramanian et al. (2018) mentioned the distribution in Karnataka
and Tamilnadu. |
|
09 |
Davidioides martini (Fraser, 1924) |
Gomphidae |
Sathe & Bhusnar (2010) mentioned D. martini without any
specimen or photographic evidence from Amba Reserve Forest. However,
Subramanian et al. (2018) mentioned the distribution in Kerala only. |
|
10 |
Cyclogomphus vesiculosus (Selys, 1873) |
Gomphidae |
Kalkman et al. (2020)
synonymized C.vesiculosus with C. ypsilon. |
|
11 |
Onychogomphus nilgiriensis (Fraser, 1922) |
Gomphidae |
Koparde et al. (2014)
recorded O. nilgiriensis from Parpoli, which is a case of misidentification. The
individual shown by Koparde et al. (2014) is
actually Melligomphus acinaces. |
|
12 |
Hylaeothemis indica (Fraser, 1946) |
Libellulidae |
Kalkman et al. (2020)
synonymized H. indica with H. apicalis. |
|
13 |
Orthetrum anceps (Schneider, 1845) |
Libellulidae |
Prasad (1996) reported this
European species from Maharashtra. This species is very similar to O. glaucum, O. luzonicum
and O. taeniolatum, and it cannot be
identified without genital examination. Considering the known geographical
range of O. anceps given by Boudot et al.
(2013), we omit this record from the checklist of Maharashtra. |
|
14 |
Orthetrum testaceaum (Burmeister, 1839) |
Libellulidae |
Babu et al. (2009)
reported this species from Pune. However, Subramanian et al. (2018) omitted
this species from the checklist of Western Ghats. No other records are
available from the state. |
|
15 |
Sympetrum hypomelas
(Selys, 1884) |
Libellulidae |
Kulkarni et al. (2012)
mentioned S. hypomelas in the checklist of
Maharashtra from Bhimashankar WS. However,
Subramanian et al. (2018) mentioned this as a doubtful record. Considering
the geographical range given by Subramanian & Dow (2010), we omit this
species until any strong evidence is found. |
Table 6. Family-wise distribution
of Odonata species.
|
|
Family |
Amboli-Chaukul-Parpoli Region |
Maharashtra State (updated) |
|
01 |
Lestidae |
02 |
06 |
|
02 |
Platystictidae |
01 |
02 |
|
03 |
Calopterygidae |
03 |
03 |
|
04 |
Chlorocyphidae |
02 |
03 |
|
05 |
Euphaeidae |
03 |
04 |
|
06 |
Platycnemididae |
06 |
10 |
|
07 |
Coenagrionidae |
20 |
28 |
|
08 |
Aeshnidae |
06 |
10 |
|
09 |
Gomphidae |
07 |
21 |
|
10 |
Macromiidae |
02 |
06 |
|
11 |
Corduliidae |
00 |
01 |
|
12 |
Libellulidae |
38 |
48 |
|
13 |
Genera incertae
sedis |
02 |
02 |
|
|
Total |
93 |
144 |
For images - -
click here for full PDF
References
Anonymous
(2021a). Cyclogomphus flavoannulatus Rangnekar,
Dharwadkar, Sadasivan &
Subramanian, 2019. In: Joshi, S., P. Dawn, P. Roy & K. Kunte
(eds.). Odonata of India, v. 1.57. Indian Foundation for Butterflies.
Accessed on 06 September 2021
http://www.indianodonata.org/sp/802/Cyclogomphus-flavoannulatus
Anonymous
(2021b). Melligomphus acinaces Laidlaw, 1922. In: Joshi, S., P.
Dawn, P. Roy, & K. Kunte (eds.). Odonata of
India, v. 1.57. Indian Foundation for Butterflies. Accessed on 06 September
2021. http://www.indianodonata.org/sp/508/Melligomphus-acinaces
Anonymous
(2021c). Epithemis mariae Laidlaw, 1915 – Ruby Hawklet. In: Joshi, S., P. Dawn, P. Roy, & K. Kunte (eds.). Odonata of India, v. 1.57. Indian
Foundation for Butterflies. Accessed on 06 September 2021.
http://www.indianodonata.org/sp/587/Epithemis-mariae
Anonymous
(2021d). Lestes concinnus Hagen in Selys,
1862 – Dusky Spreadwing. In: Joshi, S., P. Dawn, P.
Roy, & K. Kunte (eds.). Odonata of India,
v. 1.57. Indian Foundation for Butterflies. Accessed on 06 September 2021.
http://www.indianodonata.org/sp/209/Lestes-concinnus
Anonymous (2021e).
Macrodiplax cora Brauer,
1867 – Estuarine Skimmer. In: Joshi, S., P. Dawn, P. Roy, & K. Kunte (eds.). Odonata of India, v. 1.57. Indian
Foundation for Butterflies. Accessed on 06 September
2021.http://www.indianodonata.org/sp/599/Macrodiplax-cora
Babu, R., C. Sinha & M. Prasad
(2009). New records
of Odonata (Anisoptera) from Maharashtra. Records
of the Zoological Survey of India. 108: 113–117.
Boudot, J.P., W. Schneider & B. Samraoui (2013).Orthetrum coerulescens
ssp.anceps. The IUCN Red List of Threatened
Species 2013: e.T13186368A13186370. Accessed on 06 September 2021. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2013-1.RLTS.T13186368A13186370.en
Bhakare, S.D., S.H. Bhoite
& P.A. Pawar (2020). Lestes patricia
taamrpatti ssp. nova (Insecta:
Odonata: Lestidae) from Maharashtra, India. Bionotes. 22 (2): 85–91. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.18751.53925
Bhakare, S.D., V.P. Nair, P.A. Pawar, S.H. Bhoite & K. Sadasivan (2021). Two new species of Euphaea Selys, 1840
(Odonata: Zygoptera: Euphaeidae)
from northern Western Ghats, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 13(5):
18200–18214. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.6579.13.5.18200-18214
Dow, R.A.
(2017). Lestes concinnus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened
Species 2017: e.T158656A83379420. Accessed on 09 June 2021. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2017-1.RLTS.T158656A83379420.en
Dumont, H.J.,
D. Ikemeyer & T. Scheider
(2017).Lestes concinnus and L. pallidus: two
non-metallic species with wide, complementary ranges (Odonata: Lestidae). Odonatologica
46 (1/2): 99–110.
Fraser, F.C.
(1933). The Fauna of
British India including Ceylon and Burma, Odonata. Vol. I. Taylor and Francis Ltd.,
London, 436 pp.
Fraser, F.C.
(1934). The Fauna of
British India including Ceylon and Burma, Odonata. Vol. II. Taylor and Francis Ltd.,
London, 442 pp.
Fraser, F.C.
(1936). The Fauna of
British India including Ceylon and Burma, Odonata. Vol. III. Taylor and Francis Ltd.,
London, 461 pp.
IUCN (2021). The IUCN Red List of Threatened
Species. Version 2021-2. Accessed on 06 September 2021. https://www.iucnredlist.org
Joshi, S.
& D. Sawant (2019). Ceriagrion chromothorax
sp. nov. (Odonata: Zygoptera:
Coenagrionidae) from Sindhudurg, Maharashtra, India. Journal
of Threatened Taxa 11(7): 13875–13885. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.4753.11.7.13875-13885
Joshi, S. &
D. Sawant (2020). Description of Bradinopyga konkanensis sp. nov.
(Odonata: Anisoptera: Libellulidae)
from the coastal region of Maharashtra, India. Zootaxa
4779(1): 065–078. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4779.1.4
Joshi, S.,
O.E. Kosterin & K. Kunte
(2016). New status
for Fraser’s forgotten Aciagrion approximans krishna, stat. nov. (Odonata: Zygoptera: Coenagrionidae) from the Western Ghats of India. International
Journal of Odonatology 19 (1–2): 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/13887890.2016.1166463
Joshi, S., P.
Dawn, P. Roy & K. Kunte (eds.) (2021). Odonata of India, v. 1.57. Indian Foundation for
Butterflies. Accessed on 06 September 2021. https://www.indianodonata.org/home
Kalkman, V.J., R. Babu,
M. Bedjanič, K. Conniff, T. Gyeltshen,
M.K. Khan, K.A. Subramanian, A. Zia & A.G. Orr (2020). Checklist of the dragonflies and
damselflies (Insecta: Odonata) of Bangladesh, Bhutan,
India, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. Zootaxa
4849(1): 001–084. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4849.1.1
Koli, Y. & A. Dalvi (2021). A new distribution record of Melanoneura bilineata
Fraser, 1922 (Insecta: Odonata) from India. Journal
of Threatened Taxa 13(9): 19380–19382. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.7536.13.9.19380-19382
Koli, Y., A. Dalvi & D. Sawant
(2021). New records
of Agriocnemis keralensis
Peters, 1981 and Gynacantha khasiaca MacLachlan, 1896 (Insecta: Odonata) from Maharashtra, India. Journal of
Threatened Taxa 13(7): 18908–18919. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.6801.13.7.18908-18919
Koparde, P., P. Mhaske
& A. Patwardhan (2014). New records of dragonflies and damselflies (Insecta:
Odonata) from the Western Ghats of Maharashtra, India. Journal of Threatened
Taxa 6(5): 5744–5754. https://doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.o3402.5744-54
Kulkarni,
P.P., R. Babu, S. Talmale,
C. Sinha & S.B. Mondal (2012). Insecta: Odonata, pp. 397–428. In
Director, Zoological Survey of India (ed.), Fauna of Maharashtra: state
fauna Series. Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata.
Mujumdar, N.,
D. Sawant, A. Sumanapala, P. Rangnekar
& P. Koparde (2020). Rapid multi-taxa assessment
around Dhamapur Lake (Sindhudurg, Maharashtra, India)
using citizen science reveals significant odonate
records. Journal of Threatened Taxa 12(13): 16795–16818. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.6028.12.13.16795-16818
Papazian, M.,
H.J. Dumont & N.J. Mary-Sasal (2007). The Odonata of the Pacific Ocean
islands of Wallis and Futuna, with special reference to speciation in Ischnura aurora (Brauer).
Odonatologica 36(1): 53–62.
Payra, A., A. Deshpande & P. Koparde (2022). Up and above: Northernmost
records of Macromidia donaldi
donaldi (Fraser, 1924) and Merogomphus
longistigma (Fraser, 1922) from the Western Ghats
of India (Odonata: Synthemistidae: Gomphidae). Revista de
la Sociedad Entomológica Argentina 81: 63–69. https://doi.org/10.25085/rsea.810208
Prasad, M.
(1996). An account
of the Odonata of Maharashtra State, India. Records of the Zoological Survey
of India. 95: 305–327.
Rangnekar, P., O. Dharwadkar,
S. Kalesh & K.A. Subramanian (2019). A new species of Cyclogomphus Selys, 1854 (Insecta: Odonata: Gomphidae) from
the Western Ghats, India with comments on the status of Cyclogomphus
vesiculosus Selys,
1873. Zootaxa 4656(3): 515–524.
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4656.3.8
Rathod, D.M.,
B.M. Parasharya & S.S. Talmale
(2016). Odonata (Insecta) diversity of southern Gujarat, India. Journal
of Threatened Taxa. 8(11): 9339–9349. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.2609.8.11.9339-9349
Sathe, T.V. & A.R. Bhusnar (2010). Biodiversity of mosquitovorous dragonflies (Order: Odonata) from Kolhapur
district including Western Ghats. Biological Forum. 2: 38–41.
Satose, V., V. Choursiya,
R. Deulkar & S. Menon (2018). Avian fauna of Amboli Ghat, Sindhudurg District,
Maharashtra State, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 10(13):
12805–12816. https://doi.org/10.11609/jot.2886.10.13.12805-12816
Subramanian,
K.A. (2011). Megalogomphus hannyngtoni. The IUCN Red List of Threatened
Species 2011: e.T175188A7119228. Accessed on 11 June 2021. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2011-1.RLTS.T175188A7119228.en
Subramanian,
K.A. & R.A. Dow (2010). Sympetrum hypomelas. The IUCN Red List of Threatened
Species 2010: e.T167274A6321070. Accessed on 06 September 2021. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2010-4.RLTS.T167274A6321070.en
Subramanian,
K.A. & R. Babu (2020). Dragonflies and Damselflies (Insecta: Odonata) of India, pp. 29–45. In: Ramani, S., P. Mohanraj & H.M. Yeshwanth
(eds.). Indian Insects: Diversity and Science. CRC Press, Taylor &
Francis Group, London, 450 pp.
Subramanian,
K.A., K.G. Emiliyamma, R. Babu,
C. Radhakrishnan & S.S. Talmale (2018). Atlas of Odonata (Insecta) of the Western Ghats, India. Zoological Survey of India,
Kolkata, 417 pp.
Tiple, A. & P. Koparde
(2015). Odonata of
Maharashtra, India with Notes on Species Distribution. Journal of Insect
Science 15: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/iev028