Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 December 2021 | 13(14): 20278–20283

 

ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) 

https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.7498.13.14.20278-20283

#7498 | Received 06 June 2021 | Final received 18 October 2021 | Finally accepted 21 November 2021

 

 

Photographic record of Dholes predating on a young Banteng in southwestern Java, Indonesia

 

Dede Aulia Rahman 1, Mochamad Syamsudin 2, Asep Yayus Firdaus 3, Herry Trisna Afriandi 4 & Anggodo 5

 

1 Department of Forest Resources Conservation and Ecotourism, Faculty of Forestry, IPB University (Bogor Agricultural University), Kampus IPB Darmaga Bogor 16680 Indonesia.

2,3,4,5 Ujung Kulon National Park, Jl. Perintis Kemerdekaan No.51, Labuan, Pandeglang 42264 Banten, Indonesia.

 1 dede.auliarahman@gmail.com (corresponding author), 2 mochamadsyamsudin32@gmail.com, 2 f.yayus@gmail.com, 4 herrytrisna20@gmail.com, 5 anggodo.ksdae@gmail.com

 

 

 

Editor: Honnavalli N. Kumara, Salim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History, Coimbatore, India.   Date of publication: 26 December 2021 (online & print)

 

Citation: Rahman, D.A., M. Syamsudin, A.Y. Firdaus, H.T. Afriandi & Anggodo (2021). Photographic record of Dholes predating on a young Banteng in southwestern Java, Indonesia. Journal of Threatened Taxa 13(14): 20278–20283. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.7498.13.14.20278-20283

 

Copyright: © Rahman et al. 2021. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.  JoTT allows unrestricted use, reproduction, and distribution of this article in any medium by providing adequate credit to the author(s) and the source of publication.

 

Funding: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

 

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

 

Acknowledgements: We thank the Rhino Monitoring Unit (RMU) team in UKNP, who contributed to data collection. We thank the Indonesian Ministry of Environment and Forestry and the Head of Ujung Kulon National Park to facilitate and granting permission to conduct the field surveys. We also thank two referees who stayed anonymously for their constructive comments and suggestions to improve the manuscript.

 

 

 

Abstract: A long-term camera-trap study of the Javan Rhinoceros in 2013 in Ujung Kulon National Park (UKNP), Indonesia, allowed us to document the first photographic evidence of Dholes preying on a young Banteng and other species. Our photographs suggested that Dholes get in large packs to predate on Banteng and commonly separate young from adults when attacking the young. Future research should examine the Dhole diet and interspecific relationships between Dhole and Banteng to gain a better understanding of the ecological impacts of endangered predators on endangered prey in UKNP.

 

Keywords: Bos javanicus, camera trap, Cuon alpinus, ecological impacts, Indonesia, interspecific relationships, predation.

 

 

Historically, Dholes Cuon alpinus occurred throughout southern Asia (Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Nepal, and Pakistan), eastern Asia (China, Korean Peninsula, Russian Far East), and southeastern Asia (Cambodia, Lao PDR, Malaysia, Myanmar, Thailand, Viet Nam, and Indonesia), and as far west as the mountains ranging from eastern Kazakhstan to northern Pakistan (Heptner & Naumov 1967). Recently, most of the Dhole’s population has been fragmented and continues to decline (they now occur in <25% of their historical range) and therefore the species is categorized as ‘Endangered’ by the IUCN Red List (Kamler et al. 2015). In Indonesia, historically, Dholes occurred throughout both Sumatra and Java; however, their current distribution on both islands has contracted considerably during the past 30 years; consequently, the species is protected by Indonesian law (Regulation of the Minister of Environment and Forestry of the Republic of Indonesia No. P.106/MENLHK/SETJEN/KUM.1/12/2018; Indonesian Ministry of Environment and Forestry 2018).      

Despite their endangered status and widespread distribution, there is still relatively little known about the ecology of Dholes in Indonesia. For example, there have been only nine studies that determined the daily behavior and feeding habits of Dholes in Indonesia (Pudyatmoko et al. 2007; Nurvianto et al. 2015, 2016; Pudyatmoko 2017, 2018; Rahman et al. 2018, 2019; Rahman & Mardiastuti 2021). Some of these studies have described potential prey for Dholes in two protected areas (Baluran National Park and Ujung Kulon National Park), but evidence of predation behaviour through direct observation or camera footage has not been reported. Our study is the first to document predation activity by Dholes on a large-sized ungulate species, the Banteng Bos javanicus in Ujung Kulon National Park.

    

Methods

Study area

Our study area was located in Ujung Kulon National Park (UKNP) in southwestern Java, Indonesia (Figure 1). We conducted long-term camera-trap surveys in the peninsula of UKNP (323 km2). The park biota is a tropical rainforest that has experienced various natural and anthropogenic disturbances in the past and present. The destructive tsunami in 1883 and landslides in 2018 in the Sunda Strait have caused secondary growth of biota in the Park. The UKNP contains the last known population of Javan Rhinoceros Rhinoceros sondaicus sondaicus. The UKNP also contains only one other large-sized ungulate, the Banteng, as well as small- to medium-sized ungulates such as Java Mouse-deer Tragulus javanicus, Javan Warty Pig Sus verrucosus, Eurasian Wild Pig Sus scrofa, Red Muntjac Muntiacus muntjak, and Javan Deer Rusa timorensis. Large carnivores present in UKNP include the Javan Leopard Panthera pardus melas and Dhole (Rahman et al. 2018, 2020).

 

Field methods

The sampling effort was 39,420 trap days with a grid of 329 1-km2 trap stations. We placed 108 camera units into 134 trap stations, with 0.3–0.5 km between stations, and ran them from January to December 2013. We used two models of camera traps—Bushnell Trophy Cam 119467 and Bushnell Trophy Cam 119405. At each station, we placed single camera and at approximately 170 cm height from ground level with a 10–20 degree angle directed towards the ground (the cameras were set at 1-minute video mode with 1-minute intervals). We checked camera traps every 28–30 days to avoid data loss due to possible camera malfunction and battery and memory card depletion. We moved the camera traps within the same grid when they did not capture any animal (zero presence) after two or three checking. Sequential frames of the same species were counted as an independent photographic event if they were >30 minute apart. We recorded 607 independent photographs of Dholes during a survey period. We used latitude and longitude information converted into digital data in GIS using the ArcMap program to map each photograph location.

 

Results

On 28 May 2013 at 0743–0757 h, a camera recorded a young Banteng, accompanied by three adult females, attacked and preyed upon by more than 15 adult Dholes (Image 1). On 24 September 2013 at 1700–1712 h, another camera recorded more than six adult Dholes trying to kill a young Banteng (accompanied by 3 adult females) in the same pattern as before (Image 2). The only other video of Dhole-ungulate interactions was of a Java Mouse-deer being chased by five adult Dholes on 18 April at 1216 h, a wild pig attacked by two adult Dholes on 15 October at 1110 h, and one adult male Javan Rhinoceros being followed by three adult Dholes on 31 July at 1643 h (Image 3).

 

Discussion        

These photographs indicate that Dholes are capable of predating on large-sized ungulates such a Banteng, although probably mostly young of this species. A review of Dhole diets showed that their preferred weight range is 130–190 kg, and that the two most preferred species are Sambar and Chital (Hayward et al. 2014). These results are supported by research in India, such as in Nagarahole, which found Dholes usually prefer medium-sized prey (Karanth & Sunquist 2000), such as Chital Deer Axis axis and Sambar Deer Rusa unicolor (Karanth & Sunquist 1995). In India, Dholes were occationaly found to consume Gaur Bos gaurus, a large-sized ungulate (Johnsingh 1983; Karanth & Sunquist 1995; Hayward et al. 2014), indicating large-sized ungulates are not common prey of Dholes in India. In Bhutan and Laos, Dholes were found to prey mostly on both medium and small-sized ungulates (Wang & Macdonald 2009; Thinley et al. 2011; Kamler et al. 2012). In Cambodia, although Dholes preferred Muntjac, a small-sized ungulate, they also regularly consumed Banteng (18% of diet), indicating Dholes are capable of sometimes preying on large-sized ungulates (Kamler et al. 2020). Similary, in Baluran National Park, East Java, Dholes were found to consume mostly large-sized ungulates including Banteng and Water Buffalo Bubalus bubalis (Nurvianto et al. 2016). Thus, Dholes in Indonesia and other areas of southeastern Asia might be more likely to prey on large-sized ungulates compared to Dholes in India, where medium-sized ungulates are more common.

Dholes may hunt alone, in pairs or large packs (Cohen 1977; Venkataraman et al. 1995), and we recorded similar group sizes in UKNP. Previous studies have shown that larger pack sizes of Dholes take larger prey (Hayward et al. 2014; Kamler et al. 2020), and our photographs supported this conclusion because a pack of at least 15 Dholes were involved in the predation event on the young Banteng. Previous researchers have reported that Dholes attack young of Banteng, Gaur, and Water Buffalo by chasing the herds and separating calves from their mothers (Krishnan 1972; Prater 1980). In our case, the Dhole pack attacked the calf while it was still next to its presumed mother, although during the attack the Dholes appeared to try and separate the young from its mother. A throat injury tyipcally is not part of a Dhole hunting technique (Johnsingh 1983), although in our case a Dhole first grabbed the young Banteng by the throat in an attempt to bring it to the ground. The estimated time of the predation event (from contact to killing) was approximately 14 minutes.

Although three Dholes were photographed following an adult male Javan Rhinoceros, this probably was not a predation attempt. Firstly, adult male Javan Rhinoceros’ weigh approximately 1,000–2,000 kg, which is far outside of accessible prey range for Dholes (30–235 kg; Hayward et al. 2014). Secondly, only three Dholes were following the Rhinoceros, suggesting the pack size was not large enough to successfully attack such a large-sized prey. It is unclear why the three Dholes appeared to be following the male Rhinoceros, but perhaps they were escorting the Rhinoceros away from their young pups or den site. Our frame shows results in line that Dhole activity in denning increases at dawn and dusk.

In summary, we provide the first photographic evidence of a predation on Banteng by Dholes. Although previous studies found that Dholes regularly consumed Banteng in Cambodia (Kamler et al. 2020) and East Java (Nurvianto et al. 2016), their predatory behavior towards Banteng had never been photographed. These photographs suggests that Dholes get in large packs to predate on Banteng and separate young from adults when attacking the young. We do not know the Dhole diet in UKNP, nor do we know the impact of Dhole predation on the local Banteng population. Since both are threatened species, to protect potentially impacted resources, understanding the dynamics of destructive species can lead to more efficient and effective strategies (e.g., Knowlton et al. 1999). Just because a predator is identified as harming an endangered species, managing predators does not guarantee to help the conservation of an endangered prey to be more effective, efficient or cost-effective. A thorough understanding of when and why predation occurs and the conditions that make endangered prey most susceptible to predation is necessary for predator management by UKNP managers. The mitigation program in the future can be carried out by the manager by optimizing the management of predators during the state of greatest vulnerability of endangered prey and maximizing the conservation benefit-cost ratio in species management.

 

For figure & images - - click here

 

 

References

 

Cohen, J.A. (1977). A review of the biology of the Dhole or Asiatic Wild Dog (Cuon alpinus Pallas). Animal Regulation Studies 1: 141–158.

Hayward, M.W., S. Lyngdoh & B. Habib (2014). Diet and prey preference of Dholes (Cuon alpinus): dietary competition within Asia’s apex predator guild. Journal of Zoology 294: 255–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12171

Heptner, V.G. & N.P. Naumov (1967). Mammals of the Soviet Union. Vysshaya Shkola Publishers, Moscow.

Johnsingh, A.J.T. (1983). Large mammalian prey-predators in Bandipur. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 80: 1–57.

Kamler, J.F., A. Johnson, C. Vongkhamheng & A. Bousa (2012). The diet, prey selection, and activity of Dholes (Cuon alpinus) in northern Laos. Journal of Mammalogy 93(3): 627–633. https://doi.org/10.1644/11-MAMM-A-241.1

Kamler, J.F., N. Songsasen, K. Jenks, A. Srivathsa, L. Sheng & K. Kunkel (2015). Cuon alpinus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2015: e.T5953A72477893. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2015-4.RLTS.T5953A72477893.en

Kamler, J.F., K. Thatdokkham, S. Rostro-García, A. Bousa, A. Caragiulo, R. Crouthers, V. In, C. Pay, C. Pin, S. Prum, C. Vongkhamheng, A. Johnson & D.W. Macdonald (2020). Diet and prey selection of Dholes in evergreen and deciduous forests of Southeast Asia. Journal of Wildlife Management 84: 1396–1405. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.21931

Karanth, K.U. & M.E. Sunquist (1995). Prey selection by tiger, leopard and Dhole in tropical forests. Journal of Animal Ecology 64: 439–450. https://doi.org/10.2307/5647

Karanth, K.U. & M.E. Sunquist (2000). Behavioral correlates of predation by Tiger (Panthera tigris) Leopard (Panthera pardus) and Dhole (Cuon alpinus) in Nagarahole, India. Journal of Zoology 250(2): 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2000.tb01076.x

Knowlton, F.F., E.M. Gese & M.M. Jaeger (1999). Coyote depredation control: An interface between biology and management. Journal of Range Management 52(5): 398–412. https://doi.org/10.2307/4003765

Krishnan, M. (1972). An ecological survey of the larger mammals of peninsular India. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 69: 42–47.

Ministry of Environment and Forestry (2018). Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Republik Indonesia No. P.106/MENLHK/SETJEN/KUM.1/12/2018 tentang perubahan kedua atas peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan No. P.20/MENLHK/SETJEN/KUM.1/6/2018 tentang jenis tumbuhan dan satwa yang dilindungi. Sekretariat Kabinet RI, Jakarta, Indonesia.

Nurvianto, S., M.A. Imron & S. Herzog (2015). The influence of anthropogenic activities and availability of prey on the distribution of Dholes in a dry deciduous forest of East Java, Indonesia. Asian Journal of Conservation Biology 4(1): 26–36.

Nurvianto, S., R. Eprilurahman, M.A. Imron & S. Herzog (2016). Feeding habits of pack living Dhole (Cuon alpinus) in a dry deciduos forest of East Java, Indonesia. Taprobanica 8(1): 10–20. https://doi.org/10.47605/tapro.v8i1.210

Prater, S.H. (1980). The Book of Indian Animals. Bombay Natural History Society, Revised ed. 316 pp.

Pudyatmoko, S., Djuwantoko & Y. Sabarno (2007). Evidence of Banteng (Bos javanicus) decline in Baluran National Park, Indonesia. Journal of Biological Sciences 7(6): 854–859. https://doi.org/10.3923/jbs.2007.854.859

Pudyatmoko, S. (2017). Free-ranging livestock influence species richness, occupancy, and daily behaviour of wild mammalian species in Baluran National Park, Indonesia. Mammalian Biology 86: 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2017.04.001

Pudyatmoko, S. (2018). Spatiotemporal inter-predator and predator-prey interactions of mammalian species in a tropical savanna and deciduous forest in Indonesia. Mammal Research 64: 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-0180391-z

Rahman, D.A., P. Rianti, M. Muhiban, A. Muhtarom, U.M. Rahmat, Y. Santosa & S. Aulagnier (2018). Density and spatial partitioning of endangered sympatric Javan Leopard (Felidae) and Dholes (Canidae) in a tropical forest landscape. Folia Zoologica 67(3–4): 207–219. https://doi.org/10.25225/fozo.v67.i3-4.a8.2018

Rahman, D.A., R. Herliansyah, P. Rianti, U.M. Rahmat, A.Y. Firdaus & M. Syamsudin (2019). Ecology and conservation of the endangered Banteng (Bos javanicus) in Indonesian tropical lowland forest. Hayati Journal of Biosciences 26: 68–80. https://doi.org/10.4308/hjb.26.2.68

Rahman, D.A. (2020). Ecological niche and potential distribution of the endangered Bos javanicus in south-western Java, indonesia. Therya 11(1): 57–68. https://doi.org/10.12933/therya-20-840

Rahman, D.A. & A. Mardiastuti (2021). Factors influencing the activity patterns of two deer species and their response to predators in two protected areas in Indonesia. Therya 12(1): 149–161. https://doi.org/10.12933/therya-21-1087

Thinley, P., J.F. Kamler, S.W. Wang, K. Lham, U. Stenkewiz & D.W. Macdonald (2011). Seasonal diet of Dholes (Cuon alpinus) in northwestern Bhutan. Mammalian Biology 76: 518–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2011.02.003

Venkataraman, A.B., R. Arumugam & R. Sukumar (1995). The foraging ecology of Dholes (Cuon alpinus) in Mudumalai sanctuary, southern India. Journal of Zoology 237(4): 543–561. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1995.tb05014.x

Wang, S.W. & D.W. Macdonald (2009). Feeding habits and niche partitioning in a predator guildcomposed of tigers, leopards and Dholes in a temperate ecosystem in central Bhutan. Journal of Zoology 277(4): 275–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2008.00537.x