Journal of Threatened
Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 February 2024 | 16(2): 24804–24806
ISSN 0974-7907
(Online) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Print)
https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.7338.16.2.24804-24806
#7338 | Received 16 April 2021 | Final received 18 December 2023 |
Finally accepted 08 January 2024
Gastrointestinal parasites of the
Indian Flying Fox Pteropus medius in Nagpur City: a seasonal study through faecal sample analysis
Ruchika R. Sangale
1 & Priya Gawande 2
1 Department of Animal Reproduction
Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Post Graduate Institute
of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Akola, Maharashtra 444001, India.
2 Department of Veterinary
Parasitology, Nagpur Veterinary College, Nagpur Maharashtra 440006, India.
1 ruchikasangle96@gmail.com
(corresponding author), 2 priya.gawande5@gmail.com
Editor: Anonymity requested. Date of
publication: 26 February 2024 (online & print)
Citation: Sangale, R.R. & P. Gawande (2024).
Gastrointestinal parasites of the Indian Flying Fox Pteropus
medius in Nagpur City: a seasonal study through
faecal sample analysis. Journal of
Threatened Taxa 16(2):
24804–24806. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.7338.16.2.24804-24806
Copyright: © Sangale & Gawande 2024. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International License. JoTT allows unrestricted use, reproduction, and
distribution of this article in any medium by providing adequate credit to the
author(s) and the source of publication.
Funding: Self-funded.
Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Acknowledgements: R. Sangle
and P. Gawande are thankful to NGO, WILD-CER, and Dr.
Bahar Baviskar for timely
guidance and support.
Abstract: The Indian Flying Fox Pteropus medius,
among the largest Indian fruit eating bats, is commonly observed with unhurried
wing beats at dusk and tends to roost during the day in sizable, noisy colonies
situated on trees within bustling towns and villages. Notably, these colonies
are prevalent in busy areas of Nagpur city, particularly on expansive Banyan
Trees Ficus bengalensis
and Pangom Oil Trees Millettia
pinnata, owing to the consistent availability of
fruits and flowers throughout the year.
This study focuses on evaluating gastrointestinal helminth infection in
fruit-eating bats during the summer, monsoon, and winter seasons in Nagpur
city, Maharashtra. A total of 58 samples were collected, processed, and
examined using the double sedimentation technique. Of these, 46 samples
(80.01%) tested positive for Ascaris spp. eggs, with a higher percentage
during the monsoon season. Additionally, during the peak summer season, a
juvenile flying fox from one of the colonies was rescued in a dehydrated state,
displaying crusty scab-like lesions on the wing’s anterior and posterior
regions. Subsequent examination revealed the presence of the ectoparasite Macronyssus spp. on body of the juvenile
Indian Flying Fox.
Keywords: Ascaris spp., Banyan Tree,
dehydration, ectoparasite, helminths, Macronyssus
spp., mites, nematode, Pangom Oil Tree, sedimentation
technique.
Bats, belonging to the order Chiroptera, represent the only volant mammals globally,
encompassing 1,116 species. They are further classified into Megachiroptera (fruit bats) and Microchiroptera
(insectivorous bats), based on their feeding habits and morphological
adaptations. Constituting 20% of the world’s mammals, bats play crucial roles
as pollinator, seed disperser, and influencing germination of local plant
communities (Digana et al. 2000; Louis et al. 2008). Their
significance extends in structuring and regenerating forest, especially in
cleared areas (Gorghov et al. 1993; Rainey et al.
1995). Beyond ecological contributions, bats provide economic benefits such as
biological pest control, guano mining, and support for tourism, education, and
research.
Despite these positive aspects,
some bat species can have negative effects, causing damage to humans,
livestock, crops, buildings, and infrastructure. They may also pose risks such
as airplane strikes, disease transmission, and contamination (Louis et al.
2008). Furthermore, bat population is appeard to be
declining due to various human-induced environmental stresses and misbeliefs,
including habitat destruction, disturbance to caves, food resource depletion,
overhunting, pesticide use, and the spread of parasitic and infectious
diseases. In view of their overlooked importance, bat conservation becomes
imperative (Dittmar et al. 2009).
This study aims to assess major
gastrointestinal helminth infections in fruit-eating bats during the summer,
winter, and monsoon season, contributing to our understanding of bat health and
ecosystem dynamics.
Material and Methods
Samples were collected from the
different roosting sites. Amongst them two sites located at 21.158°N, 79.068°E,
are close to the Maharashtra State Veterinary Council office (MSVC), and one
additional site (21.158°N, 79.064°E) near Nagpur’s High Court area (Image 1).
The fresh samples were collected twice a week early in the morning (7:00 AM-
8:00 AM) using forceps and placed in labeled sterile plastic bottles, and
routinely processed for helminthic ova using the double sedimentation
technique. This method concentrates eggs for observation under a microscope
(10x). To execute the technique, placed 5 g of fecal sample in a beaker, mixed
thoroughly with 10–15 ml of water, repeated the process until level reached to
50 ml, and then poured through a wire mesh sieve into a sedimentation flask.
Filled to the brim and left to settle for 20 minutes. Immediately decanted the
supernatant, the 15 ml of water added to the sedimentation flask and shaken,
Supernatant poured into a beaker, and allowed to settle for 20 more minutes,
and decanted again. Finally, last single drop of sediment was taken and placed
on a glass slide, covered with a glass slip, and examined under the microscope
(10x) for ova (Image 2). Ectoparasites were collected from rescue juvenile
flying fox during clinical examination. The collected ectoparasites kept in
glycerol, and directly mounted on a microscope slide, covered, and examined (Soulsby 1982).
Results and
Discussion
A total of 58 samples were
collected over one calendar year from three roosting sites of Indian Flying
Foxes (refer to Table 1). Among them, 46 samples tested positive for the
presence of helminthic ova, specifically Ascaris spp., in alignment with
the findings of Louis et al. (2008). The seasonal prevalence of endoparasitic infection was notably higher during the
monsoon season, consistent with the results reported by Fowler (1986).
Ectoparasites, identified as Macronyssus spp. mites (Image 3), were
collected from rescued juvenile flying foxes, a pattern observed similarly by Radovsky & Krantz (1998). The mites were noted
infesting bats, appearing as tiny moving specks or red ‘jewels’ (Radovsky 1967). Macronyssus
spp. mites were significantly present on wing membrane areas posterior to
the radius ulna and within the fur. Protonymph stages were predominantly found
on wing membranes, while adult mites concentrated more on the head, as reported
by Spears et al. (1999).
Conclusion
Primary goal of study was the
seasonal fecal sample analysis for intestinal parasite of the Indian Flying Fox
Pteropus medius,
for contributing valuable current insights into the prevalent gastrointestinal
parasites affecting free-roaming bat populations. The findings revealed that
80.01% of faecal samples were infected with the
gastrointestinal parasite Ascaridia spp.,
aligning with Fowler’s (1986) observations. The endoparasitic
infection originates from environmental contamination, possibly through
polluted water or food sources. In this study, the nematode infection was
commonly found probably due to its direct life cycle involving no intermediate
host and easy transmitted by oro-fecal route through
contaminated feed, water, and soil and has the potential to accumulate in a
free-ranging flying fox population (Fowler 1986). Moreover, further studies are
required to rule out the role in zoonotic transmission. Additionally, the study
documented Macronyssus spp. mites. These
parasites feed on their host’s blood and lymph and can complete their life
cycle partially outside the host (Dittmar et al. 2009;
Radovsky 2010). This finding is notable due to Macronyssus spp.’s known distribution in
Europe and its original host being the bat Nyctalus
leisleri, according to Fain et al. (2003).
Table 1. The number of faecal samples collected and samples positive for Ascaris
spp.
|
Season |
No. of samples |
No. of samples positive for Ascaris
spp. |
Percentage of positive samples |
|
Summer |
19 |
15 |
78.94 % |
|
Monsoon |
18 |
17 |
94.44 % |
|
Winter |
21 |
14 |
66.66 % |
|
|
Average percent |
80.01% |
|
For images
- - click here for full PDF
References
Digana, P.M.C.B., W.B.Yapa, P.V. Randeniya
& W.D. Ratnasooriya (2000). Roost selection of Sri Lankan
bats. Proceeding of the 1st Annual Sessions, University of Colombo,
Sri Lanka, 39 pp.
Dittmar, K., C.W. Dick, B.D. Patterson,
M.F. Whiting & M.E. Gruwell (2009). Pupal deposition and ecology of
bat flies (Diptera: Streblidae)
in a Mexican cave habitat. Journal of Parasitology 95(2): 308–314. https://doi.org/10.1645/GE-1664.1
Fain, A., G.
Walter & M. Heddergott (2003). A new species of Macronyssus kolenati
(Acari: Macronyssidae)
from Leisler’s Bat, Nyctalus leisleri (Mammalia: Chiroptera)
in Germany. International Journal of Acarology 29: 55–61.
Fowler, M.E.
(1986). Zoo Wild Animal
Medicine 2nd Edition. Saunders Company, Hong Kong, 316 pp.
Gorghov, L., F. Cornejo, C.A. Scorra & M.J. Amarillo (1993). The role of seed dispersal in the
natural regeneration of rain forest after strip-cutting in the Peruvian Amazon.
Vegetatio 107: 339–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00052233
Louis, J.R.,
P.P. Mohan, C. Mahendran, A. Venhatesan, K. Prabhu, B. Ravichandran & S. Molur
(2008). A survey of
the roosting sites of Indian Flying Fox Pteropus
giganteus in and around Coimbatore and Palakkad
districts, India. Bat Net 9(1): 11–12.
Radovsky, F.J. (1967). The Macronyssidae
and Laelapidae (Acarina:
Mesostigmata) parasites on bats. University of
California Publications in Entomology 46. University of California Press, viii
+ 288 pp.
Radovsky, F.J. & G.W. Krantz (1998). A new genus and species of
predaceous mite in the parasitic family Macronyssidae
(Acari: Mesostigmata).
Journal of Medical Entomology 35(4): 527–537.
Radovsky, F.J. (2010). Revision of genera of the
Parasitic mite family Macronyssidae (Mesostigmata: Dermanyssoidea)
of the world. Indira Publishing House, Michigan, 170 pp.
Rainey, W.E.,
E.D. Pierson, T. Elmqvist & P.A. Cox (1995). The role of flying foxes (Pteropodidae) in oceanic island ecosystems of the
Pacific. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London 67:
79–96.
Soulsby, E.J.L. (1982). Helminths, Arthropods
and Protozoa of Domesticated Animals, 7th edition. Bailliere
Tindall, 809 pp.
Spears, R.E., L.A. Durden &
D.V. Hagan (1999). Ectoparasites of Brazillian free-tail bats
with emphasis on anatomical site preferences for Chiroptonyssus
robustipes; Class: Macronyssidae.
Journal of Medical Entomology 36(4): 481–485.