Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 February 2024 | 16(2): 24804–24806

 

ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) 

https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.7338.16.2.24804-24806

#7338 | Received 16 April 2021 | Final received 18 December 2023 | Finally accepted 08 January 2024

 

 

Gastrointestinal parasites of the Indian Flying Fox Pteropus medius in Nagpur City: a seasonal study through faecal sample analysis

 

Ruchika R. Sangale 1 & Priya Gawande 2

 

1 Department of Animal Reproduction Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Post Graduate Institute of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Akola, Maharashtra 444001, India.

2 Department of Veterinary Parasitology, Nagpur Veterinary College, Nagpur Maharashtra 440006, India.

1 ruchikasangle96@gmail.com (corresponding author), 2 priya.gawande5@gmail.com

 

 

Editor: Anonymity requested.                 Date of publication: 26 February 2024 (online & print)

 

Citation: Sangale, R.R. & P. Gawande (2024). Gastrointestinal parasites of the Indian Flying Fox Pteropus medius in Nagpur City: a seasonal study through faecal sample analysis. Journal of Threatened Taxa 16(2): 24804–24806. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.7338.16.2.24804-24806

  

Copyright: © Sangale & Gawande 2024. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.  JoTT allows unrestricted use, reproduction, and distribution of this article in any medium by providing adequate credit to the author(s) and the source of publication.

 

Funding: Self-funded.

 

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

 

Acknowledgements: R. Sangle and P. Gawande are thankful to NGO, WILD-CER, and Dr. Bahar Baviskar for timely guidance and support.

 

 

Abstract: The Indian Flying Fox Pteropus medius, among the largest Indian fruit eating bats, is commonly observed with unhurried wing beats at dusk and tends to roost during the day in sizable, noisy colonies situated on trees within bustling towns and villages. Notably, these colonies are prevalent in busy areas of Nagpur city, particularly on expansive Banyan Trees Ficus bengalensis and Pangom Oil Trees Millettia pinnata, owing to the consistent availability of fruits and flowers throughout the year.  This study focuses on evaluating gastrointestinal helminth infection in fruit-eating bats during the summer, monsoon, and winter seasons in Nagpur city, Maharashtra. A total of 58 samples were collected, processed, and examined using the double sedimentation technique. Of these, 46 samples (80.01%) tested positive for Ascaris spp. eggs, with a higher percentage during the monsoon season. Additionally, during the peak summer season, a juvenile flying fox from one of the colonies was rescued in a dehydrated state, displaying crusty scab-like lesions on the wing’s anterior and posterior regions. Subsequent examination revealed the presence of the ectoparasite Macronyssus spp. on body of the juvenile Indian Flying Fox.

 

Keywords: Ascaris spp., Banyan Tree, dehydration, ectoparasite, helminths, Macronyssus spp., mites, nematode, Pangom Oil Tree, sedimentation technique.

 

 

 

Bats, belonging to the order Chiroptera, represent the only volant mammals globally, encompassing 1,116 species. They are further classified into Megachiroptera (fruit bats) and Microchiroptera (insectivorous bats), based on their feeding habits and morphological adaptations. Constituting 20% of the world’s mammals, bats play crucial roles as pollinator, seed disperser, and influencing germination of local plant communities (Digana et al. 2000; Louis et al. 2008). Their significance extends in structuring and regenerating forest, especially in cleared areas (Gorghov et al. 1993; Rainey et al. 1995). Beyond ecological contributions, bats provide economic benefits such as biological pest control, guano mining, and support for tourism, education, and research.

Despite these positive aspects, some bat species can have negative effects, causing damage to humans, livestock, crops, buildings, and infrastructure. They may also pose risks such as airplane strikes, disease transmission, and contamination (Louis et al. 2008). Furthermore, bat population is appeard to be declining due to various human-induced environmental stresses and misbeliefs, including habitat destruction, disturbance to caves, food resource depletion, overhunting, pesticide use, and the spread of parasitic and infectious diseases. In view of their overlooked importance, bat conservation becomes imperative (Dittmar et al. 2009).

This study aims to assess major gastrointestinal helminth infections in fruit-eating bats during the summer, winter, and monsoon season, contributing to our understanding of bat health and ecosystem dynamics.

 

Material and Methods

Samples were collected from the different roosting sites. Amongst them two sites located at 21.158°N, 79.068°E, are close to the Maharashtra State Veterinary Council office (MSVC), and one additional site (21.158°N, 79.064°E) near Nagpur’s High Court area (Image 1). The fresh samples were collected twice a week early in the morning (7:00 AM- 8:00 AM) using forceps and placed in labeled sterile plastic bottles, and routinely processed for helminthic ova using the double sedimentation technique. This method concentrates eggs for observation under a microscope (10x). To execute the technique, placed 5 g of fecal sample in a beaker, mixed thoroughly with 10–15 ml of water, repeated the process until level reached to 50 ml, and then poured through a wire mesh sieve into a sedimentation flask. Filled to the brim and left to settle for 20 minutes. Immediately decanted the supernatant, the 15 ml of water added to the sedimentation flask and shaken, Supernatant poured into a beaker, and allowed to settle for 20 more minutes, and decanted again. Finally, last single drop of sediment was taken and placed on a glass slide, covered with a glass slip, and examined under the microscope (10x) for ova (Image 2). Ectoparasites were collected from rescue juvenile flying fox during clinical examination. The collected ectoparasites kept in glycerol, and directly mounted on a microscope slide, covered, and examined (Soulsby 1982).

 

Results and Discussion

A total of 58 samples were collected over one calendar year from three roosting sites of Indian Flying Foxes (refer to Table 1). Among them, 46 samples tested positive for the presence of helminthic ova, specifically Ascaris spp., in alignment with the findings of Louis et al. (2008). The seasonal prevalence of endoparasitic infection was notably higher during the monsoon season, consistent with the results reported by Fowler (1986).

Ectoparasites, identified as Macronyssus spp. mites (Image 3), were collected from rescued juvenile flying foxes, a pattern observed similarly by Radovsky & Krantz (1998). The mites were noted infesting bats, appearing as tiny moving specks or red ‘jewels’ (Radovsky 1967). Macronyssus spp. mites were significantly present on wing membrane areas posterior to the radius ulna and within the fur. Protonymph stages were predominantly found on wing membranes, while adult mites concentrated more on the head, as reported by Spears et al. (1999).

 

Conclusion

Primary goal of study was the seasonal fecal sample analysis for intestinal parasite of the Indian Flying Fox Pteropus medius, for contributing valuable current insights into the prevalent gastrointestinal parasites affecting free-roaming bat populations. The findings revealed that 80.01% of faecal samples were infected with the gastrointestinal parasite Ascaridia spp., aligning with Fowler’s (1986) observations. The endoparasitic infection originates from environmental contamination, possibly through polluted water or food sources. In this study, the nematode infection was commonly found probably due to its direct life cycle involving no intermediate host and easy transmitted by oro-fecal route through contaminated feed, water, and soil and has the potential to accumulate in a free-ranging flying fox population (Fowler 1986). Moreover, further studies are required to rule out the role in zoonotic transmission. Additionally, the study documented Macronyssus spp. mites. These parasites feed on their host’s blood and lymph and can complete their life cycle partially outside the host (Dittmar et al. 2009; Radovsky 2010). This finding is notable due to Macronyssus spp.’s known distribution in Europe and its original host being the bat Nyctalus leisleri, according to Fain et al. (2003).

 

Table 1. The number of faecal samples collected and samples positive for Ascaris spp.

Season

No. of samples

No. of samples positive for Ascaris spp.

Percentage of positive samples

Summer

19

15

78.94 %

Monsoon

18

17

94.44 %

Winter

21

14

66.66 %

 

Average percent

80.01%

 

For images - - click here for full PDF

 

References

 

Digana, P.M.C.B., W.B.Yapa, P.V. Randeniya & W.D. Ratnasooriya (2000). Roost selection of Sri Lankan bats. Proceeding of the 1st Annual Sessions, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka, 39 pp.

Dittmar, K., C.W. Dick, B.D. Patterson, M.F. Whiting & M.E. Gruwell (2009). Pupal deposition and ecology of bat flies (Diptera: Streblidae) in a Mexican cave habitat. Journal of Parasitology 95(2): 308–314.  https://doi.org/10.1645/GE-1664.1

Fain, A., G. Walter & M. Heddergott (2003). A new species of Macronyssus kolenati (Acari: Macronyssidae) from Leisler’s Bat, Nyctalus leisleri (Mammalia: Chiroptera) in Germany. International Journal of Acarology 29: 55–61.

Fowler, M.E. (1986). Zoo Wild Animal Medicine 2nd Edition. Saunders Company, Hong Kong, 316 pp.

Gorghov, L., F. Cornejo, C.A. Scorra & M.J. Amarillo (1993). The role of seed dispersal in the natural regeneration of rain forest after strip-cutting in the Peruvian Amazon. Vegetatio 107: 339–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00052233

Louis, J.R., P.P. Mohan, C. Mahendran, A. Venhatesan, K. Prabhu, B. Ravichandran & S. Molur (2008). A survey of the roosting sites of Indian Flying Fox Pteropus giganteus in and around Coimbatore and Palakkad districts, India. Bat Net 9(1): 11–12.

Radovsky, F.J. (1967). The Macronyssidae and Laelapidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata) parasites on bats. University of California Publications in Entomology 46. University of California Press, viii + 288 pp.

Radovsky, F.J. & G.W. Krantz (1998). A new genus and species of predaceous mite in the parasitic family Macronyssidae (Acari: Mesostigmata). Journal of Medical Entomology 35(4): 527–537.

Radovsky, F.J. (2010). Revision of genera of the Parasitic mite family Macronyssidae (Mesostigmata: Dermanyssoidea) of the world. Indira Publishing House, Michigan, 170 pp.

Rainey, W.E., E.D. Pierson, T. Elmqvist & P.A. Cox (1995). The role of flying foxes (Pteropodidae) in oceanic island ecosystems of the Pacific. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London 67: 79–96.

Soulsby, E.J.L. (1982). Helminths, Arthropods and Protozoa of Domesticated Animals, 7th edition. Bailliere Tindall, 809 pp.

Spears, R.E., L.A. Durden & D.V. Hagan (1999). Ectoparasites of Brazillian free-tail bats with emphasis on anatomical site preferences for Chiroptonyssus robustipes; Class: Macronyssidae. Journal of Medical Entomology 36(4): 481–485.