Conservation
status of Hildegardia
populifolia (Roxb.) Schott & Endl. (Malvaceae: Sterculioideae:
Sterculieae), an endemic of southern peninsular India
Boyina Ravi Prasad Rao 1,
Madha Venkata Suresh Babu 2, Araveeti Madhusudhana Reddy 3,
S. Sunitha 4, A. Narayanaswamy 5, G. Lakshminarayana 5 & M.
Ahmedullah 6
1,2,4,5 Biodiversity Conservation Division,
Department of Botany, Sri Krishnadevaraya University, Anantapur, Andhra Pradesh
515003, India
3 Department of Botany, Yogi Vemana University, Kadapa, Andhra
Pradesh 516003, India
6 Botanic Garden of Indian Republic,
Noida, District G.B. Nagar, Uttar Pradesh 201303, India
Email: 1 rao_rp@rediffmail.com (corresponding author), 2 mvs.ced2010@gmail.com, 3 grassced@yahoo.com,
4 sunitha_s2011@rediffmail.com, 5 m.ahmed@nic.in
Date of publication (online): 26 August 2011
Date of publication (print): 26 August 2011
ISSN 0974-7907 (online) | 0974-7893 (print)
Editor: N.P. Balakrishnan
Manuscript details:
Ms # o2733
Received 20
March 2011
Final received
16 June 2011
Finally
accepted 07 July 2011
Citation: Rao, B.R.P., M.V.S. Babu, A.M. Reddy, S.
Sunitha, A. Narayanaswamy, G. Lakshminarayana & M. Ahmedullah (2011).
Conservation status of Hildegardia populifolia (Roxb.) Schott & Endl. (Malvaceae:
Sterculioideae: Sterculieae), an endemic of southern peninsular India. Journal of Threatened Taxa3(8): 2018–2022.
Copyright: © Boyina Ravi Prasad Rao, Madha Venkata
Suresh Babu, Araveeti Madhusudhana Reddy, S. Sunitha, A. Narayanaswamy, G.
Lakshminarayana & M. Ahmedullah 2011. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0
Unported License. JoTT allows unrestricted use of this article in any medium
for non-profit purposes, reproduction and distribution by providing adequate
credit to the authors and the source of publication.
Acknowledgements: We thank University Grants Commission (3-49/98 SR II-1998)
for financial assistance. We also
acknowledge the support received from the Forest Department of Andhra Pradesh,
Karnataka and Tamil Nadu during our field visits from time to time.
Abstract: Hildegardia populifolia (Roxb.) Schott & Endl. an endemic
tree of southern peninsular India is assessed in terms of the IUCN Red List
status. New data from field surveys indicated Vulnerable species categorization
for H.
populifolia.
Keywords: Hildegardia populifolia, Red List status, Vulnerable.
For figures, images, tables -- click here
Conservation status of a species is an indicator of
the likelihood of that species continuing to survive in nature. The International Union for the
Conservation of Nature (IUCN) is the world’s main authority on the conservation
status of species (Mrosovsky 1997) and the IUCN Red List provides an objective
evidence-based system for classifying species in terms of the risk of
extinction. Such conservation
assessments are useful tools to prioritize species for conservation action and
to monitor the change in status of species over time. The IUCN system assesses the threat to a species based on
five core criteria: decline in populations over a period that is relevant for
the species (based on generation time); the distribution of the species
together with factors that may influence ongoing survival within its current
distribution; small population size and continuing decline; very small
populations or small distribution area; and quantitative assessment of
extinction risk (e.g. modeling) (IUCN 2001). Assessments are always done using the best available
information, but often only partial information is available for many taxa. Recently, Babu & Rao (2009) and Rao
et al. (2009, 2010) provided valuable field data for the current global
population status of Cycas beddomei Dyer and categorized
it as Endangered. In the present
study, we attempt to assess the current population status of Hildegardia
populifolia (Roxb.) Schott & Endl., a southern Indian endemic
(Ahmedullah & Nayar 1987).
Hildegardia populifolia, a deciduous forest
tree species belongs to the family Malvaceae, subfamily Sterculoideae, tribe
Sterculieae. The species was
earlier known to be represented by a sole surviving population comprising about
20 trees in Kalarayan Hills of Tamil Nadu (Ahmedullah 1990). It is an enigmatic species in that its
conservation status has been variously assessed as Critically Endangered (Sarcar
& Sarcar 2002), Endangered (Ahmedullah 1990; Walter & Gillet 1998; Rao
et al. 2003). Rao et al. (1998) recognized five subpopulations of this Endangered
species in Rayalaseema District of Andhra Pradesh. Jadhav et al. (2001) categorized it as Vulnerable. The World Conservation Monitoring Centre
(1998) assessed the conservation status of this species as Critically
Endangered. After conducting
intensive explorations for the past 15 years, our research team located the
species in Anantapur, Kadapa and Chittoor districts in southern Andhra Pradesh,
Salem Hills in northern Tamil Nadu and a small patch in Karnataka bordering
Anantapur District of Andhra Pradesh. The present study focuses on a critical evaluation of the H. populifolia population and
revision of the current conservation status based on the latest IUCN Red List Criteria (version 3.1; IUCN 2001).
Materials and Methods
Hildegardia populifolia is a deciduous tree
growing up to 20m (Image 1). The
plant is recognizable for its pale green bark. Leaves are ovate-cordate, 3–5-lobed and digitately
7-nerved. Flowers are purple, and
erect with leathery perianth. Follicles are winged, erect, thinly woody, falcately ovate-reniform and
inflated, with 1 or 2 seeds, affixed from base of the follicle and
conspicuously wrinkled when dry. The species is locally known as Galibuduga, Pichipoliki, Buddapoliki in
Telugu and Malaipuvarasu in Tamil.
The study area cover all the known localities of the
species distribution, i.e., southern Anantapur, western Kadapa, and northern
Chittoor districts of Andhra Pradesh; Devikunta area in Karnataka and Salem
Hills in Tamil Nadu (Fig. 1). The
study area was stratified into grids of 6.25×6.25 km using IRS-1C
satellite data. The whole study
area falls in the hill ranges of southern Eastern Ghats (11052’–14016’N
& 77045’–78059’E) with an altitudinal variation
of 420–982 m. Preliminary
explorations revealed the presence of H. populifolia in 29 grids in the
study area comprising 354 grids. Transects of 1000×5 m were laid down in all the 29 grids. This amounts to approximately 0.019% of
the total area, an adequate sampling intensity according to Shivaraj et al.
(2000). In all the 29 grids, the plants of ≥30cm gbh were counted and
considered for the analysis. Wherever the species was found in the grids, geographic coordinates were
recorded and the shortest continuous boundary for the species population was
been drawn on the grid map.
The assessment is carried out as per the IUCN Red List
Categories and Criteria (IUCN 2001). The Extent of Occurrence (EOO) is estimated as a minimum convex polygon
containing all the localities of species occurrence. Area of Occupancy (AOO) of the species within the grids is
studied taking into account the terrain features with respect to altitude. The
population size of the species is estimated by extrapolating the recorded
individuals in the individual transect.
Results and
Discussion
The overall distribution of the species falls within
an area of ca. 228x90 km. A
conservative approach would therefore be to consider this as one location,
however, since the threats could vary between different populations, it cannot
be considered so. Observations in
the field indicated that at least 12 locations identified for the species are
separated by reasonably unoccupied areas (Fig. 2). In total, 376 individuals of H. populifolia were counted in all
the sampled transects of 29 grids (Table 1). It was observed that the species was found mostly above
420m, restricted to top hills and rock boulders, growing in sandy red soil.
Taking these observations into consideration, a grid map has been prepared for
measuring the EOO of the species. The EOO is calculated as 14,160km2(Fig. 2). The species has a patchy
distribution within the grids and substantial areas in the individual grids (more
than 95% area) do not have this species (Fig. 2). The AOO thus is calculated to about 14.6km2 (1460ha). The population size of the species is
estimated to comprise 23,100 individuals. Results pertaining to the AOO and the number of individuals recorded in
transects extrapolation for the whole estimated population is presented in
Table 1.
Applying IUCN
criteria
Criterion
A: The available data does not provide any indicators of
change in population size over time and hence this criterion is not applied to H. populifolia.
Criterion
B:
Criterion B1: The EOO of H. populifolia is estimated to be
14,160km2 and considered to occur at more than 10 locations
(sub-criterion a). Further, there
are no extreme fluctuations observed with respect to any of (i) to (iv). It qualifies only under the
sub-criterion (b) for continuing decline in terms of (iii) area, extent and
quality of habitat. Hence, it does
not qualify for any of the threatened categories under B1.
Criterion B2: The AOO is 14.6km2. However, it does not qualify for either
(a) and (c). It qualifies only for
the sub-criterion (b) for continuing decline in terms of (iii) area, extent and
quality of habitat. Hence, it is not
threatened under subcriterion B2.
Criterion
C: Small population size and decline. The total
estimated population of H. populifolia is >23100 mature individuals. Since the number of mature plants
exceed the requirements for Vulnerable status (i.e. <10 000), the species is
not considered as threatened under this criterion.
Criterion
D: Very small or restricted populations. Although the
species population comprises a large number of individuals, it is found
restricted to < 20km2 and is prone to human activities in terms
of fire hence qualifying for Vulnerable category under D2.
Criterion
E: No demographic modeling has been undertaken for the
species and hence this criterion does not apply for the species.
The final assessment for Hildegardia
populifolia based on the present study is: VU D2.
Hildegardia populifolia assessed under
three threatened categories in different works, is currently categorized as
Vulnerable based on primary data from the field. The present study also provides significant data pertaining
to its distribution in peninsular India-in the states of Andhra Pradesh
(Anantapur, Kadapa and Chittoor districts) Tamil Nadu (Salem Hills) and
Karnataka (in areas bordering Anantapur District of Andhra Pradesh).
REFERENCES
Ahmedullah, M. (1990). Hildegardia
populifolia, pp. 251–253. In: Nayar, M.P &
A.R.K. Sastry (eds.). Red Data Book of Indian Plants—Volume 3. Botanical
Survey of India, Calcutta.
Ahmedullah, M. & M.P. Nayar (1987). Endemic Plants of the Indian Region—Volume 1. Botanical Survey of India, Calcutta.
Babu, M.V.S. & B.R.P. Rao (2009). Studies on the distribution
pattern of a Critically Endangered taxon, Cycas beddomei (Cycadaceae). Encephalartos 96: 28–30.
IUCN Species Survival Commission (2001). IUCN Red List
Categories, Version 3.1. www.iucn.org/themes/ssc/redlists/ssc-rl-c.htm.
Jadhav, S.N., D.K. Ved, U. Ghate, K.N. Reddy & S.
Reddy (2001). Proceedings of the Workshop in Conservation Assessment
and management planning for Medicinal plants of Andhra Pradesh (CAMP) MPCC.
Hyderabad.
Mrosovsky, N. (1997). IUCN’s credibility
critically endangered. Nature 389: 436.
Rao, B.R.P., S. Sunitha & A.M. Reddy (1998). Notes on Hildegardia
populifolia (Roxb.) Schott & Endl. (Sterculiaceae), an
endemic and endangered species. Eighth Annual conference of IAAT and National
Seminar on Biodiversity, conservation and taxonomy of tropical flowering
plants, Calicut, 47pp.
Rao, R.P.B., M.V.S. Babu, B.
Sadasivaih, S.K. Basha, & K.N. Ganeshaiah (2009). Current threat
status of Cycas beddomei Dyer, an endemic species of
the Tirupati-Kadapa Hills, Andhra
Pradesh, India. Encephalartos 97: 21–25.
Rao, R.P.B., M.V.S. Babu & J.
Donaldson (2010). A Reassessment of
the conservation status of Cycas beddomei Dyer (Cycadaceae),
an endemic of the Tirupati-Kadapa Hills, Andhra Pradesh, India, and comments on
its CITES Status. Encephalartos 102: 19–24.
Rao, C.K., B.L. Geetha & G. Suresh (2003). Red List of
Threatened Vascular Plant Species in India. BSI, Calcutta, 144pp.
Sarcar & Sarcar (2002). Status, botanical
description, natural distribution zone, propagation practices and conservation
efforts of Hildegardia populifolia (Roxb.) Schott &
Endl.:A threatened tree species of dry tropical forests in India. Indian Forester 128(7): 757-770.
Shivaraj, B., K.M.C. Narayanibarve, R.U. Shankaar
& K.N. Ganeshaiah (2000). Mapping of forests
based on biological diversity to identify conservation sites: a case study from
Udupi and South Canara districts of Karnataka. Journal of the Indian Institute of Science 80: 531–536.
Walter, K.S & H.J. Gillet (1998). 1997 IUCN Red List of
Threatened Plants. IUCN Publishing service,
Cambridge. www.unep-wcmc.org.
World Conservation Monitoring Centre (1998). Hildegardia
populifolia. In: IUCN 2011. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.
Version 2011.1. <www.iucnredlist.org>.