Journal of Threatened Taxa |
www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 April 2022 | 14(4): 20915–20920
ISSN 0974-7907
(Online) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Print)
https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.6910.14.4.20915-20920
#6910 | Received 12
December 2020 | Final received 09 January 2022 | Finally accepted 15 April 2022
Case report of hook worm Grammocephalus hybridatus
and stomach bot Cobboldia elephantis infections in a free-ranging Asian Elephant Elephas
maximus in Tamil Nadu, India
Kaveri Theerthagiri
Kavitha 1 , Chirukandoth Sreekumar 2 & Bhaskaran
Ravi Latha 3
1,3 Department of Veterinary
Parasitology, Madras Veterinary College, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal
Sciences University (TANUVAS), Vepery, Chennai, Tamil
Nadu 600007, India.
2 Department of Wildlife Science,
Faculty of Basic Sciences, TANUVAS, Vepery, Chennai,
Tamil Nadu 600007, India.
1 kavitharavi2004@yahoo.com
(corresponding author), 2 sreesnake@gmail.com, 3 lathabravi@gmail.com
Editor: Rupika S. Rajakaruna,
University of Peradeniya Peradeniya, Sri Lanka. Date
of publication: 26 April 2022 (online & print)
Citation: Kavitha, K.T., C. Sreekumar
& B.R. Latha (2022). Case report of hook worm Grammocephalus hybridatus
and stomach bot Cobboldia elephantis infections in a free-ranging Asian Elephant Elephas
maximus in Tamil Nadu, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 14(4): 20915–20920. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.6910.14.4.20915-20920
Copyright: © Kavitha et al. 2022. Creative Commons Attribution
4.0 International License. JoTT allows unrestricted use, reproduction, and
distribution of this article in any medium by providing adequate credit to the
author(s) and the source of publication.
Funding: The Department
of Veterinary Parasitology
(Main), Madras Veterinary
College.
Competing interests: The authors
declare no competing interests.
Acknowledgements: The authors are grateful to Dr. A. Sugumar, forest veterinary
assistant surgeon and authorities of the Tamil Nadu Forest Department for
sending samples to the Department of Veterinary Parasitology for identification
of parasites.
Abstract: Elephants in the wild are
susceptible to many gastrointestinal parasites. In the present study, necropsy
was conducted on a free-ranging Asian Elephant Elephas maximus female
aged about 15 years which died at Coimbatore forest range, Tamil Nadu state,
India. The necropsy revealed that the liver was infected with round worms and
the stomach was heavily infested with dipteran larvae. These round worms and
larvae were collected and processed by dehydrating in ascending grades of
alcohol and then cleared in carbolic acid. The cleared samples were mounted and
examined under light microscopy for species identification. Faecal samples
collected from the rectum were analysed by sedimentation for the presence of
helminth eggs. On microscopic examination, the head end of the round worms
showed a buccal capsule which possessed a pair of semilunar ventral cutting
plates. Male worms showed well-developed bursa at the posterior end. The
anterior end of the dipteran larvae showed two powerful oral hooks with cephalopharyngeal skeleton. Anterior spiracle appeared as a
short club-shaped tube with 12 lobes. The abdominal segments of the larvae had
a row of belt-like triangular spines. The posterior spiracles of the larvae had
three longitudinal parallel slits in each spiracle with closed peritreme. Based on the above morphological characters, the
round worms and larvae were identified as Grammocephalus
hybridatus and Cobboldia
elephantis, respectively. Strongyle eggs were
identified in the faecal sample based on the morphology of thin shell and
segmented yolk. This appears to be the first report of G. hybridatus infection in a free-ranging elephant in
Tamil Nadu state, India.
Keywords: Dipteran larvae, faecal samples,
gastrointestinal parasites, helminth eggs, infection, morphological characters,
necropsy, strongyle egg, round worms.
The life of the wild animals is
threatened by many factors such as cannibalism, infighting injuries, accidents,
habitat loss & fragmentation, poaching & hunting, as well as different
diseases (Riddle et al. 2010). Furthermore, parasitism has an impact on host
species evolution and ecology through sexual selection (Hamilton & Zuk 1982), and parasite-mediated competition results in
reduced population size or extinction (Price et al. 1986). The Asian Elephant Elephas
maximus is an ‘Endangered’ species as per the IUCN Red List of Threatened
Species (Williams et al. 2020). Free-living wild animals are generally infected
with numerous parasites, but adverse effects occur only in the animals that are
physiologically or nutritionally stressed (Gaur et al. 1979; Fowler & Mikota 2006). Elephants in the wild are susceptible to
many gastrointestinal (GI) parasites (Vidya & Sukumar 2002). According
to investigations, many gastrointestinal parasites have been found in Indian
and Sri Lankan elephants: Murshidia murshidia, M. falcifera, M. indica, M. longicaudata, Quilonia renniei, Equinurbia sipunculiformis, Decrusia aditicta, Amira pileata (Seneviratna 1955;
Fernando & Fernando 1961; Sundaram et al. 1971), Choniangium
epistomum (Datta et al.
1972), Bathmostomum sangeri
(Sathianesan et al. 1979), Grammocephalus
hybridatus (Islam & Talukdar 2014), and
larvae of Cobboldia elephantis
(Seneviratna & Jayasinghe 1968). Strongyles are the most frequent GI parasites in African
(Scott & Dobson 1989) and wild Asian Elephants (Watve 1995; Vidya & Sukumar 2002;
Dharmarajan et al. 2005; Nishanth et al. 2012; Abeysekara et al.
2018).
Parasitic infections can cause
disease and death in wild animals and they can also infect domestic animals and
vice versa. Parasites also alter the host’s behaviour, health and reproduction,
and make parasite transmission easier (Abhijit et al. 2018). Understanding
infections in wild animals is critical because illnesses can cause elephants to
die under extremely stressful situations. Hence, it is important to
monitor the mortalities of wild elephants and carry out post-mortem sampling to
determine whether the cause of death was due to GI parasitic infections (Vidya &
Sukumar 2002; Lynsdale et
al. 2017). This study reports the occurrence of Grammocephalus
hybridatus worms in the liver and Cobboldia elephantis larvae
in the stomach collected during the post mortem of a free-range elephant in
Tamil Nadu.
Materials and Methods
During August 2020, the death of
a wild female elephant (approximately 15 years of age) was reported in the
Coimbatore forest range, Tamil Nadu. Necropsy was carried out by the forest
veterinary officer. On detailed examination, the liver was found to be infected
with round worms and the stomach was heavily infested with dipteran larvae.
These round worms and larvae were collected and sent in 10% formalin to the
Department of Veterinary Parasitology, Madras Veterinary College for further
species identification. Faecal sample collected directly from the rectum was
also sent to analyse the sample for helminth eggs.
Processing of the samples
The round worms were washed in
water, dehydrated in ascending grades of alcohol, and then cleared using
carbolic acid. Cleared specimens were mounted using DPX and examined under
light microscope. The species identification of the round worm was carried out
based on van der Westhuysen (1938) and Kumar et al.
(2011). The dipteran larvae were boiled in 10% sodium hydroxide solution. They
were kept in the same solution for one week. Later, they were dehydrated and
cleared. The larvae were identified based on the morphological features
described by Zumpt (1965). The faecal sample was analyzed using sedimentation and flotation technique as per
the standard protocol (Soulsby 1982) and examined
under light microscope for the presence of helminth eggs.
Results
In the present study, the round
worms recovered from the elephant liver were identified as Grammocephalus
hybridatus. The male worms measured 35 mm and 1.5
mm while the females were 37 mm and 1.5 mm in length and breadth, respectively.
Both the male and female worms were more or less equal in size (Image 1a,b).
Morphology of female worm
The head end of the worms was
characteristically curved towards the dorsum. The buccal capsule was wide
anteriorly and narrowed posteriorly and possessed a pair of small semilunar
ventral cutting plates (Image 2a). At a depth of the buccal cavity, there was a
dorsal cone. The dorsal cone did not reach half the length of the buccal
capsule. It was slender and curved (Image 2b). The oesophagus was long with a caecal diverticulum extending towards the pharynx (Image
2c). The vulva was present close to the middle of the body (Image 2d). The
width of the worm reached a maximum at the vulvar region, then tapered to both
ends. The tail end of the female was slightly bent dorsad
and tapered to the posterior extremity with a slight knob-like structure at the
end (Image 2e).
Morphology of male worm
Male worms showed well-developed
bursa at the posterior end (Image 3a). The spicules were equal in length (1.4
mm). They were stout, wavy, contained a dark core and were alate
with ornamentations. Their tips were pointed and placed together (Image 3b).
The lateral lobe was elongated when compared to the dorsal lobe; the bursal
rays were relatively short and the lateral rays were quite stout (Image 3c). In
the dorsal lobe, the external-dorsal rays were elongated; dorso-dorsal
rays arose directly from the base of the dorsal lobe. Tip of the dorsal rays
were bifurcated with the external branch ending in a cup-like structure (Image
3d).
Faecal examination
Strongyle eggs were identified in the
faecal sample based on the morphology of egg showing thin shell and segmented
yolk (Image 4); the same has been earlier described by van der Westhuysen (1938). Many investigators made similar
observations in Asian Elephants from various places (Nishant et al. 2012;
Abeysinghe et al. 2017; Abeysekara et al. 2018;
Abhijit et al. 2018).
Morphology of dipteran larvae
In this study, the dipteran
larvae collected from the elephant stomach were identified as stomach bot Cobboldia elephantis (Cobbold, 1866) based
on the morphological characters of the anterior end, body spines and posterior
spiracles as per the descriptions of Zumpt (1965). A
total of 400 stomach bots (2–2.8 cm long) were collected from the stomach
(Image 5A). The anterior end of the larva showed two powerful oral hooks with cephalopharyngeal skeleton (Image 5B). The mouth cavity was
surrounded by a crown of teeth which was somewhat shorter ventrally (Image 5C).
Anterior spiracle appeared as a short club-shaped tube with 12 lobes (Image
5D1,D2). The abdominal segments of the larvae had a row of belt-like triangular
shaped spines (Image 5E). The posterior spiracles of the larvae showed three
longitudinal parallel slits in each spiracle with closed peritreme
following processing (Image 5F).
Discussion
The present communication records
the morphological features with specific characters that assisted in the
identification of G. hybridatus and C. elephantis. Grammocephalus hybridatus
is a hookworm inhabiting the bile duct of elephants and immature stages are
present in the intestine causing nodules which is similar to Bunostomum sp. (Fowler & Mikota 2006). Elephants get infected through skin
penetration or by direct ingestion of larvae. They are the largest hook worms
under the family Ancylostomidae (Sundaram 1966). G.
clathratus, G. hybridatus,
G. varedatus, and G. intermedius
are the four species in the genus Grammocephalus,
each of which is unique to a single host (Obanda et
al. 2011). G. clathratus was observed in the
liver and bile duct of African Elephants in Kenya by Obanda
et al. (2011). G. varedatus and G. hybridatus infect Indian Elephants, while G.
intermedius lives in the large intestine of African Rhinoceros (van der Westhuysen 1938). The adult parasites are blood suckers
which cause anaemia and weakness along with other signs of hepatic
insufficiency when occurring as heavy infection (Fowler & Mikota 2006).
The study of the morphology of G.
hybridatus was in accordance with the description
of van der Westhuysen (1938) from Asian Elephant
origin, with slight variations in morphometry. Bhalearo
(1935) first recorded the hookworm (G. clathratus)
from India, while Rajasekhariah et al. (1975)
reported the occurrence of both the immature and mature G. hybridatus from the stomach nodule of a captive Asian
Elephant. Previously, Pillay et al. (1976) reported the occurrence of G. hybridatus from an elephant in Mysore while Islam &
Talukdar (2014) reported G. hybridatus infection
in a free-ranging Asian Elephant from Assam. Apart from G. hybridatus, elephants are affected with a variety of
intestinal strongyle worms (Vidya & Sukumar
2002), implying that the strongyle eggs found in the
faeces likely represented a diversity of species.
Vidya & Sukumar (2002)
analyzed the faecal samples from wild elephants in Nilgiris, southern India and found that 86.8% of the
samples were positive for parasite eggs. Strongyles
were found in 40%, 16%, and 8% of samples from Mudumalai,
Anamalai, and Sathyamangalam
forests in southern India, respectively (Nishant et al. 2012). In Sri Lanka,
wild elephants (93.3%) had a greater prevalence of parasite infection than
semi-captive (55.0%) and captive elephants (25.0%) (Abeysekara
et al. 2018). Mixed infections were also reported to be more common (47.1%)
than single infections (21.2%) (Abeysekara et al.
2018). The strongyle eggs were found in 100% of wild elephants in Sri Lanka, according to Abeysinghe et al.(2017).
The majority of strongylid nematodes have eggs that
are morphologically indistinguishable and is referred to as strongyles.
Because of their direct life cycle, nematodes are the most common and numerous
helminths in elephants, as evidenced by the high species richness (Elsheikha & Obanda 2010).
Intestinal parasites in general and strongyles in
particular, appear to be common in wild elephants, but the prevalence appears
to vary greatly between locations.
The morphology of C. elephantis larvae (stomach bot) in this study was in
accordance with that observed by Panda et al. (2005), Venu
et al. (2015), and Ananda et al. (2017) who reported the larvae of C. elephantis from the stomach of free-ranging wild
elephants from different parts of country. The anterior spiracle of this
larvae, however, has yet to be described. The anterior spiracle and crown of
teeth around their mouth were described for the first time in this study. Such
characters were identified based on the descriptions of the larva of the
subfamily Platycobboldia loxodontis, which affects African Elephants (Zumpt 1965).
The pathogenesis of C. elephantis larvae in elephants has not been well
studied and they appear to be well tolerated by the animals even in large
numbers; however, it has been reported that the infested animals show symptoms
of gradual emaciation, disinclination to feed and loss of condition (Raquib 1970). In the present case, major area of the
stomach was attached with 2–2.8 cm sized larvae of C. elephantis
similar to the observations by Panda et al. (2005) and Kakkassery
et al. (2011). The gastric wall revealed congestion with tiny ulcers and
significant inflammation of the gastric mucosa after these larvae was removed.
Panda et al. (2005) had previously reported similar findings.
This appears to be the first
report of G. hybridatus infection in a
free-range elephant in the state of Tamil Nadu. The anterior spiracle and crown
of teeth around the mouth of C. elephantis
larvae were morphologically described for the first time in this work, based on
descriptions of larvae from the same subfamily. The morphological
characteristics, along with supporting figures, will be helpful in diagnosis.
REFERENCES
Abeysekara, N., R.P.V.J. Rajapkse & R.S. Rajakaruna
(2018). Comparative
cross-sectional survey on gastrointestinal parasites of captive, semi-captive,
and wild elephants of Sri Lanka. Journal of Threatened Taxa 10(5):
11583–11594. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.3406.10.5.11583-11594
Abeysinghe,
K.S., A.N.F. Perera, J. Pastorini,
K. Isler, C. Mammides & P. Fernando (2017). Gastrointestinal strongyle infections in captive and wild elephants in Sri
Lanka. Gajah 46: 21–27.
Abhijith, T.V., M. Ashokkumar,
R.T. Dencin & C. George (2018). Gastrointestinal parasites of
Asian Elephants (Elephas maximus L, 1798) in south Wayanad forest
division, Kerala, India. Journal of Parasitic Diseases 42(3): 382–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12639-018-1012-0
Ananda, K.J.,
N.K. Dharanesha, P. Giridhar
& S.M.B. Gowda (2017). Cobboldia elephantis (Cobbold,
1866) larval infestation in an Indian Elephant (Elephas maximus). Journal
of Parasitic Diseases 41(2): 364–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12639-016-0805-2
Bhalerao, G.D. (1935). Helminth parasites of the
domesticated animals in India. Scientific Monograph No. 6. Imperial Council of
Agricultural Research, New Delhi.
Datta, B., A.K. Chakravarthy & A. Raquib (1972). A successful treatment of Choniangium
epistomum and Cobboldia elephantis larvae infection in elephants with tetramisole (Nilverm). Indian
Veterinary Journal 49: 1158–1159
Dharmarajan, G., M. Raman & M.C. John
(2005). Effect of
season on helminth loads of wild herbivores and cattle in the Mudumalai Wildlife Sanctuary, southern India. Zoos’
Print Journal 20: 1766–1769.
Elsheikha, H. & V.Obanda
(2010). Parasitic
impact on elephant conservation: a Kenyan view. Vet Times, the website
for the veterinary profession. Accessed on 22.12.2021. https://www.vettimes.co.uk
Fernando, A.
& C.H. Fernando (1961). Report on the helminth parasites of an Asian Elephant which died in
Singapore. Ceylon Veterinary Journal 9(4): 99–106.
Fowler, M.
& S.K. Mikota (2006). Elephant biology, medicine and
surgery. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, 166 pp.
Gaur, S.N.S.,
M.S. Sethi, H.C. Tewari
& O. Prakash (1979). A note on prevalence of helminth parasites in wild and zoo animals in
Uttar Pradesh. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 46: 159–161.
Hamilton,
D.G. & M.Zuk (1982). Heritable true fitness and
bright birds: a role for parasites? Science 218: 384–387.
Islam, S.
& A. Talukdar (2014). Grammocephalus hybridatus
infection in
a free ranging Asian Elephant from Assam. Journal of Veterinary Parasitology
28(1): 37–39.
Kakkassery, M.P., V.S. Kumar, Z. Arun, L.F. Anand & P.R.P. Kumar (2011). EEHV like haemorrhagic
myocarditis in a wild Asian Elephant (Elephas maximus). Journal of
Indian Veterinary Association Kerala 9(1): 51–52.
Kumar,
K.G.A., R. Ravindran, T. Surendranathan, E.V. Joy
& A. George (2011). Occurrence of bile duct hook
worms in a wild elephant of Wayanad, Kerala. Zoo’s Print 26(3): 26–27.
Lynsdale, C.L., H.S. Mumby,
A.D. Hayward, K.U. Mar & V. Lummaa (2017). Parasite-associated mortality in
a long-lived mammal: Variation with host age, sex, and reproduction. Ecology
and Evolution 7: 10904–10915. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3559
Nishanth, B.,
S.R. Srinivasan, M.G. Jayathangaraj & R. Sridhar
(2012). Incidence of
Endoparasitism in free-ranging elephants of Tamilnadu State. Tamilnadu
Journal of Veterinary Sciences 8(3): 171–173.
Obanda, V., T. Iwaki, N.M. Mutinda & F. Gakuya (2011). Gastrointestinal parasites and
associated pathological lesions in starving free-ranging African elephants. South
African Journal of Wildlife Research 41(2): 167–172.
Panda, S.K.,
D.N. Panda & N.K. Parhi (2005). Occurrence of Cobboldia elephantis
(Cobbold, 1866) larvae in a wild elephant. Journal
of Veterinary Parasitology 19(2): 163–164.
Pillay,
K.R.S., S.A. Rahman, K.S. Hegde & D. Rajasekharan
(1976). Grammocephalosis in an Indian elephant in Mysore. Indian Veterinary Journal 53: 670.
Price, P.W.,
M. Westoby, B. Rice, P.R. Atsatt,
R.S. Fritz, J.N. Thompson & K. Mobley (1986). Parasite Mediation in
Ecological Interactions. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 17(1):
487–505.
Rajasekariah, G.R., K.S. Hegde & K.R.S.
Pillay (1975). Unusual
occurrence of G. hybridatus, Westhuysen, 1938, in verminous nodule in the stomach of an
Indian elephant (Elephas maximus). Mysore Journal of Agricultural
Science 9: 141-145.
Raquib, A. (1970). Record of Cobboldia
elephantis (Cobbold,
1866) in elephant in Assam. Orissa Veterinary Journal 5: 28
Riddle, H.S.,
B.A. Schulte, A.A. Desai & L.V.D. Meer (2010). Elephants: a conservation overview. Journal
of Threatened Taxa 2(1): 653–661. https://doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.o2024.653-61
Sathianesan, V., K. Chandrasekharan, C. Pythal & R.K. Sundaram ( 1979). Anthelmintic efficacy of
oxibendazole against the common strongylids in
elephants. Kerala Journal of Veterinary sciences 10(1): 153–156.
Scott, M.E.
& A. Dobson (1989).The role of parasites in regulating host abundance. Parasitology
Today 5: 176–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-4758(89)90140-3
Seneviratna, P. (1955). A checklist of helminths in the
Department of Veterinary Pathology, University of Ceylon, Peradeniya. Ceylon
Veterinary Journal 3: 32–37.
Seneviratna, P. & J.B. Jayasinghe
(1968). Some
parasites from the Ceylon Elephants (Elephas maximus). Ceylon Veterinary
Journal 15: 28.
Soulsby, E.J.L. (1982). Helminths, Arthropods and
Protozoa of Domesticated Animals. 7th Edition. ELBS and Baillere Tindal, London.
Sundaram,
R.K. (1966). Some common
elephant parasites. Kerala Veterinary College and Research Institute Magazine
19–21.
Sundaram,
R.K., K. Chandrasekharan & K.M. Pillai (1971). Tetramisole as a anthelmintic against gastro
intestinal nematodes of elephants. Kerala Journal of Veterinary sciences 2(1):
55–58.
van der Westhuysen, O.P. (1938). A monograph of the helminth
parasites of the elephant. Onder stepoort Journal of Veterinary Science & Animal
Industry 10(1): 99–190.
Venu, R., T.T. Singh, R. Veeraharin & R.D. Srilatha (2015). First report of Cobboldia elephantis
(Cobbold, 1866) larvae in a free ranging wild
elephant from Andhra Pradesh, India. Journal of Parasitic Diseases
39(2): 168–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12639-013-0306-5
Vidya, T.N.C.
& R. Sukumar (2002).The effect of some ecological factors on the intestinal parasite loads
of the Asian elephant (Elephas maximus) in southern India. Journal of
Biosciences 27: 521–528.
Watve, M.G. (1995). Helminth parasites of elephants.
Ecological aspects, pp. 289–295. In: Daniel, J.C. & H. Datye (eds.). A Week with Elephants. Oxford
University Press, Bombay Natural History Society, New Delhi.
Williams, C.,
S.K. Tiwari, V.R. Goswami, S. de Silva, A. Kumar, N.
Baskaran, K. Yoganand & V. Menon (2020). Elephas maximus. The
IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2020: e.T7140A45818198. Accessed on 19
April 2022. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2020-3.RLTS.T7140A45818198.en
Zumpt, F. (1965). Myiasis in Man and Animals in
the Old World. London, Butterworth & Co. (Publishers) Ltd., xv+267 pp.