Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 June 2021 | 13(7): 18809–18816

 

 

ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) 

https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.6683.13.7.18809-18816

#6683 | Received 09 September 2020 | Final received 17 June 2021 | Finally accepted 18 June 2021

 

 

A study on the community structure of damselflies (Insecta: Odonata: Zygoptera) in Paschim Medinipur, West Bengal, India

 

Pathik Kumar Jana 1, Priyanka Halder Mallick 2  & Tanmay Bhattacharya 3

 

1–3 Department of Zoology, Vidyasagar University, Midnapore, Paschim Medinipur, West Bengal 721102, India.

1 pathikjana@gmail.com, 2 priyanka@mail.vidyasagar.ac.in (corresponding author), 3 prof.t.bhattacharya@gmail.com 

 

 

 

Editor: Raymond J. Andrew, Hislop College, Nagpur, India.         Date of publication: 26 June 2021 (online & print)

 

Citation: Jana, P.K., P.H. Mallick & T. Bhattacharya (2021). A study on the community structure of damselflies (Insecta: Odonata: Zygoptera) in Paschim Medinipur, West Bengal, India.  Journal of Threatened Taxa 13(7): 18809–18816. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.6683.13.7.18809-18816

 

Copyright: © Jana et al. 2021. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.  JoTT allows unrestricted use, reproduction, and distribution of this article in any medium by providing adequate credit to the author(s) and the source of publication.

 

Funding: Self-funded.

 

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

 

Author details: Pathik Kumar Jana is working as a research scholar, Centre for Life Sciences, Vidyasagar University, after completing his MPhil from this University.  Dr. Priyanka Halder Mallick, presently in the position of Associate Professor in Zoology, Vidyasagar University, is a PhD from Vidyasagar University. She is an active ecologist with research specializations in freshwater and forest ecology, environment and biodiversity conservation.  Dr. Tanmay Bhattacharya, retired Professor of Zoology, Vidyasagar University is PhD from University of Calcutta. He acted as a coordinator of Environmental Studies, Directorate of Distance Education, Vidyasagar University and former member of the Pollution Control Board of Tripura and Wildlife Advisory Board of Tripura.

 

Author contributions: PKJ conducted field work with regular data collection, identification and documentation along with interpretation of results and preparation of initial manuscript. PHM has designed and supervised the study with contribution in editing and reviewing the draft article and maintaining communications. TB has provided inputs in data analysis and interpretation, revision and write-up of final manuscript.

 

Acknowledgements: The first two authors are thankful to Mr. Prosenjit Dawn for his valuable tips related to field studies on odonates. The mapping support provided by Mr. Utpal Ghosh is acknowledged. Authors also express their gratitude to Vidyasagar University for providing laboratory and library facilities.

 

 

Abstract: For gauging suitability of zygopteran odonates as bioindicators of ecosystems, an attempt was made to record the seasonal diversity of damselflies from seven different types of habitats in Paschim Medinipur District, West Bengal covering 14 land use sites. The study revealed existence of 19 species of damselflies belonging to 10 genera under two families. While the riparian zone had maximum number of species (15), paddy field had the lowest number (six). Ceriagrion coromandelianum and Agriocnemis pygmaea were the most common species. C. coromandelianum was eudominant in grassland and wetland-forest interface, whereas A. pygmaea was eudominant in fish pond and paddy field. Six species, viz., Paracercion calamorum, P. malayanum, Pseudagrion australasiae, P. decorum, P. spencei, and P. microcephalum were confined only to the riparian zone. Maximum abundance of damselflies was found in the riparian zone and minimum in the paddy field. Damselflies exhibited a distinct peak in March–April and a lesser peak in September–October. Most of the land use patterns exhibited similar zygopteran faunal composition. Species diversity index was moderate (1.4–2.5) and evenness index was on the higher side (0.76–0.94). Dominance Index ranged from 26.2 to 64.6. Riparian zone appeared to be the least stressed and most equitable habitat with highest diversity and evenness index and lowest dominance index. Paddy field seemed to be the harshest habitat for damselflies with least diversity and highest dominance index. The present study suggests that community analysis of damselflies can be quite useful in the assessment of the quality of any ecosystem.

 

Keywords: Bioindicator, damselfly, dominance index, evenness index, land use type, species diversity index, Zygoptera.

 

 

 

Introduction

 

Sensitivity of damselflies to structural habitat features and their amphibious habit makes them well suited as bioindicators of environmental changes (Subramanian et al. 2008; Dolný et al. 2011). In general, odonates have been popular for monitoring health of wetlands all over the world (Chovanec & Waringer 2001). The species assemblages of damselflies are influenced by the aquatic and terrestrial vegetation which act as one of the main cues for their habitat choice. Although considerable work has been done on the ecology and diversity of odonates in many parts of India, some of the latest ones are those of Baba et al. (2019), D’Souza & Pai (2019), Payra et al. (2020), Bedjanič et al. (2020), and Pavithran et al. (2020). 

In West Bengal, Odonata fauna has been explored in recent years by Payra & Tiple (2019) & Pahari et al. (2019) from Purba Medinipur and Nayak (2020) from Asansol–Durgapur industrial area. Despite efforts of Jana et al. (2009), large parts of Paschim Medinipur have remained unexplored with respect to odonate distribution and ecology. In the aforementioned context, the present study was undertaken across different habitat structures and land use patterns comprising aquatic and semi–aquatic water bodies of Paschim Medinipur District. 

 

 

Methods

 

Study area

The present study was carried out in five blocks of Paschim Medinipur District of West Bengal, India namely Pingla, Debra, Kharagpur I, Kharagpur II and Midnapore, predominantly encompassing freshwater lentic wetlands (Figure 1). On the basis of the habitat heterogeneity, seven land use types, viz., fish pond (FP), eutrophic pond (EP), unmanaged wetland (UW), grassland (GL), paddy field (PF), wetland-forest interface (WFI), and riparian zone (RZ) were selected (Image 1a–g). The fish pond was a semi-natural water body used only for commercial fish culture and with little littoral and floating macrophytes. The man-made eutrophic pond, having high nutrient content, was severely infested with Pistia sp. (90 %), with smaller proportions of Alternanthera philoxeroides (8 %) and other hydrophytes (2 %). Unmanaged wetland was a natural water body with profuse macrophytes of varieties. The macrophytes were inventoried with reference to Mallick & Chakraborty (2014). Grassland included open fallow lands having stretches of herbaceous plants dominated by grasses. Paddy fields were lands under paddy cultivation. Wetland-forest interface were the confluence of homestead vegetation and water bodies. Riparian zone comprised of riverbank along Kangsabati River.

 

Sampling

Field sampling of adult zygopterans was done from March 2018 to February 2019. The sampling and quantitative measurements of adult damselfly species were carried out at each study site between 0800 h and 1400 h using line transect method. Transect routes, distances walked, and durations were kept constant across study sites throughout the survey. All sites were surveyed once per month preferably under reasonable weather conditions, barring a few instances. The prominent features of the study sites were also noted on the spot. Adult damselfly species were identified and photographed in the field; doubtful specimens were captured using an aerial insect net. Later they were identified by examining the morphological characteristics through a hand lens and were released after recording. For identification purpose, few damselflies were sacrificed by gently pressing their thorax and kept dry in paper envelope or in 70 % ethanol and were brought to the laboratory. The observed and collected species were identified to the lowest possible rank using taxonomic literature and field identification keys provided by Subramanian (2009), Mitra & Babu (2010), and by photographic guides from ‘Odonata of India’ website (Anonymous 2020). Updated species names were taken following the Subramanian & Babu (2017).

 

Data analysis

Important community parameters like abundance, relative abundance, Shannon–Wiener diversity index (H´) (Shannon & Wiener 1963), evenness index of Pielou (EI) (Pielou 1975), McNaughton & Wolf’s dominance index (DI) (McNaughton & Wolf 1970), and Sørensen’s similarity index (Sørensen 1948) were calculated using MS Excel. 

 

 

Results

 

During the course of study, 19 zygopteran species belonging to 10 genera under two families were recorded from the study sites. The family Coenagrionidae contained 17 species and family Platycnemididae contained two species.

Species richness exhibited spatial and temporal changes (Table 1). RZ had maximum numbers of species (15). This was followed by UW (13), FP (12), GL (10), EP (8), WFI (7) and PF (6).

Maximum number of individuals was recorded at RZ and minimum at PF. Like species richness, number of individuals also varied spatially and temporally (Table 1; Figure 2). Damselfly exhibited a more or less bimodal pattern of population fluctuation with two peaks, first one in the pre-monsoon period (March–April) and the second one in the post-monsoon period (September–October) which was not quite distinct in the WFI (Figure 2). From paddy fields no damselfly species were recorded in the month of June. WFI has highest abundance only in pre-monsoon period and there was little increase in number of individuals in post-monsoon period as compared to other land use types.

Dominance status of each species in a particular habitat was ascertained on the basis of its relative abundance according to scale of Engelmann (1973). Table 1 reveals that Agriocnemis pygmaea was eudominant species in FP and PF and dominant in remaining five habitats. Likewise, Ceriagrion coromandelianum was eudominant in GL and WFI and dominant species in the remaining habitats. No species was eudominant in EP, UW, and RZ. Other dominant species were Ceriagrion cerinorubellum & Copera marginipes in EP and WFI, Agriocnemis lacteola & Ischnura rubilio in PF, Ischnura senegalensis & Pseudagrion decorum in RZ, and Mortonagrion aborense in WFI. Rest of the species were either subdominant or recedent. Three species, viz., Paracercion calamorum, Pseudagrion australasiae, and Pseudagrion spencei were recedent in the riparian zone. In FP, two species (Agriocnemis kalinga and Onychargia atrocyana) were subrecedent.

Interestingly, no representative of family Platycnemididae was found in PF during the entire period of investigation. Turning to the analysis of species composition based on Sorensen’s index (Table 2), it is seen that WFI was moderately dissimilar in zygopteran faunal composition with RZ and slightly dissimilar with PF. Likewise, RZ was slightly dissimilar with PF and EP. All other habitats were similar in species composition. Maximum similarity was seen between FP and UW.

Analysis of diversity and evenness indices (Table 3) revealed that species diversity indices were relatively low ranging from 1.4 in the PF to 2.5 in the RZ. Evenness index, on the contrary, was on the higher side ranging between 0.76 in the GL to 0.94 in the RZ. Simultaneously, dominance Index ranged from 26.2 (RZ) to 64.6 (PF).

 

Discussion

 

Spatial heterogeneity is often regarded as a key factor that shapes diversity (Tews et al. 2004). Structurally complex habitats provide more niches and diverse ways of exploiting the environmental resources thereby increasing species diversity (Bazzaz 1975). In the present study, 19 species of Zygoptera were recorded which is comparable to the findings of Pahari et al. (2019) who found 20 species from Purba Medinipur District. Lower species richness recorded by them in all probability is because of urbanization. Most of the study sites in the present investigation exhibited similar species composition which might be attributed to the spatial proximity of sites but differences in land use types made some habitats dissimilar in species composition.

Increased richness and abundance of damselflies during pre-monsoon period, as observed in the present study, is in accordance with the findings of Corbet (2004) and Hassall & Thompson (2008), who observed higher richness and abundance during pre-monsoon period which they assigned to increased temperature and precipitation. Documentation of zygopteran diversity is important for the assessment of the health of agroecosystem. The odonate diversity in the present study was reported to be lower in agricultural landscapes than in other ecosystems, which corroborates with the findings of Kulkarni & Subramanian (2013) and it has been suggested that the lower diversity was due to the water quality, insecticide usage and vegetation structure in the paddy fields which significantly affects the zygopteran community (Baba et al. 2019; Giuliano & Bogliani 2019).

Ceriagrion coromandelianum and Agriocnemis pygmaea were the most common species encountered during the present study being eudominant and dominant species, respectively, wherever these were distributed. Relatively low species diversity index is suggestive of a relatively harsh, stressed and disturbed habitat. According to Wilhm & Dorris (1968) general diversity index ranging 1–3, suggests a moderate disturbance or stress operating in the habitat. Of the seven land use types, the riparian zone appears to be relatively less stressed whereas paddy field appears to be the most stressed. These human-altered ecosystems can be essential in serving as alternative habitats for biodiversity, especially water reliant species such as odonates. Species diversity and evenness indices in the present study are comparable with those of a study by Pahari et al. (2019) in Purba Medinipur District. Higher evenness indices (>0.8) in majority of the habitat types indicate a structural heterogeneity of the habitats. Grassland with the least evenness index appears to be the most homogeneous habitat.

Findings pertaining to the dominance index also substantiate the relation between species diversity and habitat structure and quality. McNaughton & Wolf (1970) asserted that the dominance index can be correlated with the harshness of the environment, which increases with the increase in harshness and decreases with the equitability of the habitat. Karr (1971) and Ghosh & Bhattacharya (2018) though found that dominance index for avifauna declined with vegetational development. Pahari et al. (2019) opined that dominance index of odonates is an indicator of the quality of environment. Harsh environment favours dominance of one or two species making them eudominant or dominant by eliminating some other species. In the present study, dominance index was high in paddy field and grassland which are structurally simple with little vegetational diversity subjected to greater anthropogenic interferences, experience more fluctuation of climatic and edaphic factors and as such are less equitable and harsh as compared to other habitats. On the contrary, riparian zone and unmanaged wetland had low dominance index and hence may offer better and equitable habitat resulting into relatively high zygopteran species diversity as compared to other land use types. It may thus be concluded that the damselflies have potentiality to be used as good indicators of the condition and health of land use types and habitat quality.

 

 

Table 1. Species richness (S), number (N), relative abundance (RA in %), and dominance status (DS) of zygopteran species in different land use types.

[RA <1= subrecedent (SR); 1–3.1= recedent (R); 3.2–10= subdominant (SD); 10.1–31.6= dominant (D); >31.7= eudominant (ED)] (Engelmann 1973).

Landuse Types

FP

EP

UW

GL

PF

WFI

RZ

Scientific Names

N

RA

DS

N

RA

DS

N

RA

DS

N

RA

DS

N

RA

DS

N

RA

DS

N

RA

DS

Family Coenagrionidae

1

Agriocnemis kalinga Nair & Subramanian, 2015

1

0.2

SR

-

-

-

32

5.4

SD

4

1.2

R

 

 

-

-

-

-

62

6.1

SD

2

Agriocnemis lacteola Selys, 1877

-

-

-

-

-

-

28

4.7

SD

33

9.8

SD

23

11.8

D

-

-

-

-

-

-

3

Agriocnemis pygmaea (Rambur, 1842)

200

34.0

ED

98

21.4

D

159

26.9

D

98

29.2

D

75

38.5

ED

43

15.9

D

123

12.1

D

4

Amphiallagma parvum (Selys, 1876)

25

4.2

SD

-

-

-

39

6.6

SD

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

99

9.7

SD

5

Ceriagrion cerinorubellum (Brauer, 1865)

16

2.7

R

77

16.8

D

48

8.1

SD

24

7.1

SD

4

2.1

R

32

11.8

D

34

3.3

SD

6

Ceriagrion coromandelianum (Fabricius, 1798)

68

11.5

D

102

22.3

D

67

11.3

D

115

34.2

ED

38

19.5

D

105

38.7

ED

124

12.2

D

7

Ischnura rubilio Selys, 1876

39

6.6

SD

6

1.3

R

13

2.2

R

15

4.5

SD

51

26.2

D

-

-

-

38

3.7

SD

8

Ischnura senegalensis (Rambur, 1842)

77

13.1

D

-

-

-

42

7.1

SD

13

3.9

SD

4

2.1

R

-

-

-

123

12.1

D

9

Mortonagrion aborense (Laidlaw, 1914)

22

3.7

SD

26

5.7

SD

30

5.1

SD

-

-

-

-

-

-

33

12.2

D

-

-

-

10

Onychargia atrocyana (Selys, 1865)

4

0.7

SR

45

9.8

SD

36

6.1

SD

8

2.4

R

-

-

-

12

4.4

SD

-

-

-

11

Paracercion calamorum (Ris, 1916)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

26

2.6

R

12

Paracercion malayanum (Selys, 1876)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

43

4.2

SD

13

Pseudagrion australasiae Selys, 1876

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

26

2.6

R

14

Pseudagrion decorum (Rambur, 1842)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

142

14.0

D

15

Pseudagrion microcephalum (Rambur, 1842)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

51

5.0

SD

16

Pseudagrion rubriceps Selys, 1876

46

7.8

SD

-

-

-

16

2.7

R

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

64

6.3

SD

17

Pseudagrion spencei Fraser, 1922

 

 

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

27

2.7

R

Family Platycnemididae

18

Copera marginipes (Rambur, 1842)

39

6.6

SD

72

15.7

D

52

8.8

SD

13

3.9

SD

-

-

-

41

15.1

D

-

-

-

19

Pseudocopera ciliata (Selys, 1863)

52

8.8

SD

32

7.0

SD

29

4.9

SD

13

3.9

SD

-

-

-

5

1.8

R

35

3.4

SD

 

Total number of Species (S)

12

8

13

10

6

7

15

 

Total number of Individuals (N)

589

458

591

336

195

271

1017

 

 

Table 2. Sørensen’s index of similarity between land use types.

 

 

EP

UW

GL

PF

WFI

RZ

FP

0.80

0.96

0.82

0.56

0.74

0.67

EP

 

0.76

0.78

0.57

0.93

0.43

UW

 

 

0.78

0.63

0.70

0.57

GL

 

 

 

0.75

0.71

0.56

PF

 

 

 

 

0.46

0.48

WFI

 

 

 

 

 

0.36

[0.5–0.6= slightly similar; 0.6–0.7= moderately similar; >0.7= strongly similar; 0.5–0.4= slightly dissimilar; 0.4–0.3= moderately dissimilar; <0.3= strongly dissimilar.]

 

 

Table 3. Shannon-Wiener diversity index, evenness index, and dominance index of different land use types.

Land use types

S-W Diversity index (H’)

Evenness index

(EI)

Dominance index (DI)

FP

2.1

0.83

47.0

EP

1.9

0.91

43.7

UW

2.3

0.91

38.2

GL

1.7

0.76

63.4

PF

1.4

0.81

64.6

WFI

1.7

0.86

54.6

RZ

2.5

0.94

26.2

 

 

For figures & images – click here

 

 

References

 

Anonymous (2020). Zygoptera. In: Joshi, S., P. Dawn, P. Roy & K. Kunte (eds.). Odonata of India, v. 1.48. Indian Foundation for Butterflies. http://www.indianodonata.org/tx/5-Zygoptera

Baba, Y.G., Y. Kusumoto & K. Tanaka (2019). Positive effect of environmentally friendly farming on paddy field odonate assemblages at a small landscape scale. Journal of Insect Conservation 23(3): 467–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-019-00132-2

Bazzaz, F.A. (1975). Plant species diversity in old-field successional ecosystems in Southern Illinois. Ecology 56(2): 485–488. https://doi.org/10.2307/1934981

Bedjanič, M., V.J. Kalkman & K.A. Subramanian (2020). A new species of Orthetrum Newman, 1833 (Odonata: Libellulidae) from the Andaman Islands, India. Zootaxa 4779(1): 91–100. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4779.1.6

Chovanec, A. & J. Waringer (2001). Ecological integrity of river-floodplain systems—assessment by dragonfly surveys (Insecta: Odonata). Regulated Rivers: Research & Management 17(4–5): 493–507. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrr.664

Corbet, P.S. (2004). Dragonflies: behaviour and ecology of Odonata. Harley Books, Colchester, UK, pp.xxxii+829.

D’Souza, A.R.M. & I.K. Pai (2019). A comparative study on dragonfly diversity on a plateau and an agro-ecosystem in Goa, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 11(8): 14010–14021. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.3667.11.8.14010-14021

Dolný, A., D. Bárta, S. Lhota, S., Rusdianto & P. Drozd (2011). Dragonflies (Odonata) in the Bornean rain forest as indicators of changes in biodiversity resulting from forest modification and destruction. Tropical Zoology 24(1): 63–86.

Engelmann, H.D. (1973). Untersuchungen zur Erfassung predozoogener komponenten im definierten. Okosystem. Forschungsergebnisse Staatliche Museum Naturkunde, Gorlitz. Journal of Acta Hydrobiologica 23(4): 349–361.

Ghosh, S. & T. Bhattacharya (2018). A short-term survey report on the post-winter avian diversity in Corbett National Park and associated areas, Uttarakhand, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 10(1): 11185–11191. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.3220.10.1.11185-11191

Giuliano, D. & G. Bogliani (2019). Odonata in rice agroecosystems: Testing good practices for their conservation. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 275: 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2019.01.009

Hassall, C. & D.J. Thompson (2008). The effects of environmental warming on Odonata: a review. International Journal of Odonatology 11(2): 131–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/13887890.2008.9748319

Jana, S., P.R. Pahari, T.K. Dutta & T. Bhattacharya (2009). Diversity and community structure of aquatic insects in a pond in Midnapore Town, West Bengal, India. Journal of Environmental Biology 30(2): 283–287.

Karr, J.R. (1971). Structure of avian communities in selected Panama and Illinois habitats. Ecological Monographs 41(3): 207–233. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942366

Kulkarni, A.S. & K.A. Subramanian (2013). Habitat and seasonal distribution of Odonata (Insecta) of Mula and Mutha river basins, Maharashtra, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 5(7): 4084–4095. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.o3253.4084-95

Mallick, P.H. & S.K. Chakraborty (2014). Biotic interactions of freshwater zooplankton community vis-a-vis climate change, pp. 214–229. In: Khan A.B. (ed.). Proceedings of the International Conference on Green India: Strategic knowledge for combating climate change– Prospects and challenges. Pondicherry University, Excel India Publishers, India,  985pp.

McNaughton, S.J. & L.L. Wolf (1970). Dominance and the niche in ecological systems. Science 167(3915): 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.167.3915.131

Mitra, T.R. & R. Babu (2010). Revision of Indian Species of the Families Platycnemididae and Coenagrionidae (Insecta: Odonata: Zygoptera): Taxonomy and Zoogeography. Records of Zoological Survey of India, Occasional Paper No. 315: 1–104.

Nayak, A.K. (2020). Additions to the Odonata (Insecta) fauna of Asansol-Durgapur industrial area, West Bengal, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 12(3): 15391–15394. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.5138.12.3.15391-15394

Pahari, P.R., S.S. Mandal, S. Maiti & T. Bhattacharya (2019). Diversity and community structure of Odonata (Insecta) in two land use types in Purba Medinipur District, West Bengal, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 11(6): 13748–13755. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.4139.11.6.13748-13755

Pavithran, S., N. Chitra & R. Arulprakash (2020). Checklist of Odonata in the rice fields of India. Indian Journal of Entomology 82(1): 99–109. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8172.2020.00024.3

Payra, A. & A.D. Tiple (2019). Odonata fauna in adjoining coastal areas of Purba Medinipur district, West Bengal, India. Munis Entomology & Zoology 14(2): 358–367.

Payra, A., K.A. Subramanian, K. Chandra & B. Tripathy (2020). A first record of Camacinia harterti Karsch, 1890 (Odonata: Libellulidae) from Arunachal Pradesh, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 12(8): 15922–15926. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.4653.12.8.15922-15926

Pielou, E.C. (1975). Ecological Diversity. Wiley Inter Science, New York, 165pp.

Shannon, C.E. & W. Wiener (1963). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.

Sørensen, T.A. (1948). A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species content and its application to analyses of the vegetation on Danish commons. Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskabs, Biolgiske Skrifter 5: 2–16.

Subramanian, K.A. & R. Babu (2017). Checklist of Odonata (Insecta) of India. Version 3.0. www.zsi.gov.in.

Subramanian, K.A. (2009). Damselflies and dragonflies of Peninsular India - a field guide. Vigyan Prasar, Department of Science and Technology, India, 118pp.

Subramanian, K.A., S. Ali & T.V. Ramachandra (2008). Odonata as indicators of riparian ecosystem health: a case study from south-western Karnataka, India. Fraseria (N.S.) 7: 83–95.

Tews, J., U. Brose, V. Grimm, K. Tielbörger, M.C. Wichmann, M. Schwager & F. Jeltsch (2004). Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. Journal of Biogeography 31(1): 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0305-0270.2003.00994.x

Wilhm, J.L. & T.C.  Dorris (1968). Biological Parameters for Water Quality Criteria. BioScience 18(6): 477–481. https://doi.org/10.2307/1294272