Comparison of avifaunal diversity in and around Neora Valley National Park, West Bengal, India

Utpal Singha Roy ¹, Arijit Pal ², Purbasha Banerjee ³& Subhra Kumar Mukhopadhyay ⁴

¹ Department of Zoology, ^2,3 Department of Conservation Biology, Durgapur Government College, JN Avenue, Durgapur, West Bengal 713214, India

⁴ Hooghly Mohsin College, Chinsurah, West Bengal 712101, India

Email: ¹ srutpal@gmail.com (corresponding author), ² arijitpal1988@gmail.com, ³ banerjeepurbasha@gmail.com, ⁴ msubhro@yahoo.com

Date of publication (online): 26 October 2011

Date of publication (print): 26 October 2011

ISSN 0974-7907 (online) | 0974-7893 (print)

Editor: Rajiv S. Kalsi

Manuscript details:

Ms # o2542

Received 11 August 2010

Final received 28 August 2011

Finally accepted 27 September 2011

Citation: Roy, U.S., A. Pal, P. Banerjee & S.K. Mukhopadhyay (2011). Comparison of avifaunal diversity in and around Neora Valley National Park, West Bengal, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 3(10): 2136–2142.

Copyright: © Utpal Singha Roy, Arijit Pal, Purbasha Banerjee, Subhra Kumar Mukhopadhyay 2011. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. JoTT allows unrestricted use of this article in any medium for non-profit purposes, reproduction and distribution by providing adequate credit to the authors and the source of publication.

Acknowledgements: The authors are thankful to the Director of Public Instuction, Government of West Bengal and Divisional Forest Manager, Kalimpong, West Bengal for their kind help and cooperation.

Abstract: Anthropogenic intervention has led to conversion of much of the global diversity by means of habitat alterations. The present study was carried out to investigate the importance of habitat quality and habitat heterogeneity for the diversity, distribution and abundance of avifauna in and around Neora Valley National Park (NVNP) during April–May 2010. A total of 73 bird species belonging to 25 families were recorded during the present study applying a modified point count method. Forest edges were found to be most diverse with a total count of 54 bird species having an abundance of 172.53 number of birds ha-¹. Study areas with human settlements was represented by a total species count of 24 with an abundance of 130.39 number of birds ha-¹ while a total species count of 22 with an abundance of 69.32 number of birds ha-¹ was recorded from thick vegetation assemblage with close canopy cover. This site specificoccurrence pattern for avifauna was reflected in the study of diversity indices. The highest Shannon-Wiener general diversity score of 3.77 was recorded for bird species from forest edges. Study areas with dense canopy closure were found to support more habitat specialist bird species while areas having human settlements harboured more opportunistic bird species. An overall negative influence of human settlements on bird diversity, distribution and abundance was evidenced from the present study and needs further investigation. Moreover, intensive studies will certainly enrich our knowledge of avian diversity and distribution pattern from the present study location.

Keywords: Avifauna, diversity indices, hotspot, Lava, Neora Valley National Park.

For figures, images, tables -- click here

Neora Valley National Park (NVNP), is a compact patch of virgin forest located in the Eastern Himalaya, is a global ‘Biodiversity Hotspot’. The northern and northeastern boundaries of NVNP are contiguous with Sikkim and Bhutan, respectively, and link the Pangolakha Wildlife Sanctuary in Sikkim. The southern boundaries of NVNP are remotely connected with the Chapramari Wildlife Sanctuary and the Gorumara National Park. NVNP belongs to an Important Bird Area (IBA Site code: IN-WB-06 under the IBA criteria: A1 (threatened species), A2 (endemic bird area) and 130: Eastern Himalaya. According to Islam & Rahmani (2004), Prakriti Samsad has recorded 288 species of birds from Lava and Loleygoan ranges which are adjacent to this National Park. Relationship between habitat and bird diversity has been reported by Chettri et al. (2005) from western Sikkim. The present study attempts to prepare a checklist of birds to compare bird diversity of closed canopy covered areas of NVNP, its edges and of the areas where forests are subjected to various degrees of pressure from human disturbances.

Study Area

Three contrasting forest patches were chosen in the present study depending upon the complexity of habitat structure. A thick vegetation assemblage with close canopy cover, edges of forests, and areas with human settlements in and around NVNP were studied for bird diversity and has been referred to as study area 1 - (27⁰05’49”N & 88⁰41’29”E; 1927m), study area - 2 (27⁰06’01”N & 88⁰40’33”E; 1612m) and study area - 3 (27⁰05’11”N & 88⁰39’41”E; 2061m) in the present investigation (Image 1). Study area - 3 was located adjacent to a hill station Lava, a place of major tourist attraction in northern Bengal. Intense anthropogenic influence, both direct and indirect was evident in this area. Much of the forest has already been destroyed here and ever increasing tourism pressure is engulfing the remains.

Neora Valley was notified as a national park in the year 1992 based on the provisions of the Wildlife (Protection) Act 1972 and covers two biomes, the Sino-Himalayan temperate forest (Biome-7) from 1800 to 3600 m elevation and the Sino-Himalayan subtropical forest (Biome-8) from 1000 to 2000 m elevation (Islam & Rahmani 2004). The phytogeography of NVNP consists of the subtropical broadleaf hill forest, montane wet temperate forest and subtropical pine forest (Champion & Seth 1968). According to Rodgers et al. (2002) NVNP lies in the bio-geographic zone 2. Floral and faunal composition of NVNP typically represents that of oriental regions with high endemism. Human settlements around this protected area have altered the biodiversity due to habitat degradation. This region is a major tourist attraction and the consequent disturbances coupled with the pressure for livelihood of local people is forcing the conversion of this well known birders’ paradise.

Methods

Sutherland (2006) recommended point count as the most efficient method for estimating avian abundance from mixed habitat types. Since the present study site was mostly heterogeneous, a total of 162 point counts (nine counts on each day for six consecutive days at three sites) during the first two hours after sunrise (0600–0800 hr), during noon (1100–1300 hr) and in the evening (1600–1800 hr) between the 29 April and 04 May 2010 were carried out. We selected a grid of nine points in each study site and adjacent points were 200m apart. Counting of birds in bands of 30 and 50 m has been recommended for close forest and open habitat areas (Sutherland 2006). In the present study a fixed radius (always at a distance between 30 and 40 m) circular-plot method was used. At each individual point count, observations were made for 10 minutes for all the birds seen (perched or flying under the canopy) and photographed if not identified immediately. Birds seen or heard within the fixed radius plot were counted separately from those detected outside the plot. Ali (1996), Grimmett et al. (1998) and Kazmierczak & Perlo (2000) were followed for identification. Avifaunal density was calculated by applying the formula: Avifaunal density, Ď = (n₁ + n₂/π r²m) ln (n₁ + n₂/n₂) (where, r = radius of concentric zone from the point of observation (30 and 40 m); n₁= number of birds counted within r; n₂ = number of birds counted beyond r; m = number of replicate counts) following Henderson (2003). Shannon-Wiener index of diversity (H^/), Pielou’s evenness index (J^/), Margalef’s richness index (D_MARG) and Simpson’s dominance index (D_SIMP) were calculated to analyze the avian community structure using PAST statistical software (Pandya & Vachhrajani 2010). Although both Shannon measures and Simpson’s index consider the proportional abundances of species, H^/ is more sensitive to rare species, whereas D_SIMPputs greater emphasis on common species. On the other hand, Margalef’s richness index (D_MARG), considers both abundances and species numbers whereas Pielou’s evenness index (J^/) considers abundance and species occurrence pattern. Therefore, combinations of these indices were used to comment on the diversity of avifaunal community from the present study locations. Hierarchical cluster analysis was done to construct a dendrogram for commenting on the relation between the study areas, using SPSS 13.0.

Results

A total of 73 bird species belonging to 25 families were recorded during the short period of the present study (Appendix 1). Family-wise distribution of all the bird species varied widely among all three study sites, with Muscicapidae having the highest representatives followed by Corvidae. The highest bird diversity was recorded in study area - 2 (total species count of 54 with an abundance of 172.53 birds ha^-1) followed by study area - 1 (total species count of 24 with an abundance of 130.39 birds ha^-1) and study area - 3 (total species count of 22 with an abundance of 69.32 birds ha^-1). Figure 1 represents the co-occurrence of birds among the three study sites. The transition zones between study area - 1 and study area - 2, study area - 2 and study area - 3 and study area - 1 and study area - 3 were represented by 17, nine and five bird species, respectively. Only five bird species were found at the same time in all three sites. All the diversity indices studied in the present investigation were higher in study area - 2 with H^/, D_SIMP, J^/ and D_MARG scores of 3.77, 0.97, 0.80 and 10.29 respectively (Table 1). Diversity index values recorded from study area - 1 and study area -3 werecomparable with H^/, D_SIMP, J^/ and D_MARG scores of 2.64 and 2.86, 0.90 and 0.93, 0.58 and 0.80 and 4.72 and 4.95, respectively. Dendrogram, constructed from hierarchical cluster analysis showed that study area - 1 and study area - 3 were nearer to each other while the most diverse forest edges of study area - 2 was the farthest (Fig. 2).

Discussion

Conservationists around the globe are facing great challenges under the mounting threats of anthropogenic disturbances to biodiversity. Moreover, holistic inventory of diversity requires nearly impossible levels of time and effort. Considering these factors, short-span study of biota for overall biodiversity estimation is of great importance and of late much emphasis has been given to prepare checklists of birds on a wider scale (Chakravarthy & Sridhar 1995).

This study indicated a greater diversity of birds in forest edges when compared to dense forest patches with closed canopy covers and in areas with anthropogenic settlements and these finding is similar to Aich & Mukhopadhyay (2008). Edges of forests were found to contain both habitat generalist and habit specialist birds while dense canopy closure supported more of habitat specialist avian species like, Spot-bellied Eagle OwlBubo nipalensiswhile areas under anthropogenic influence harboured more of opportunistic bird species. Distribution wise, only five bird species were found to be co-occurring in all three study sites. This habitat specific distribution of avifauna was reflected in the study of diversity indices where all the indices were higher in areas of forest edges. Avifaunal diversity and abundance in canopy closure were higher than in areas with human settlements but diversity index scores of both the study areas were comparable. This was also reflected in the dendrogram where the most diverse forest edges (study area - 2) were located separately from the cluster of study area - 1 and study area - 3. This may be attributed to the fact that although both Shannon measures (H^/) and Simpson’s index (D_SIMP) consider the proportional abundance of species, H^/ is more sensitive to rare species, whereas D_SIMP puts emphasis on the common species. Species evenness in homogeneous forest edges was higher, and was followed by areas under anthropogenic influence and closed canopy cover. This may be due to the fact that canopy closure supports more specialist species with restricted distribution pattern and narrow niche width while areas under anthropogenic intervention support even distribution of generalist and opportunistic bird species that can exploit the available resources with an overlapping pattern of niche width. Anthropogenic disturbances on forest structure and function are well on record (Bhat & Murali 2001; Chandrashekara et al. 2006) and present findings also indicated a negative influence of anthropogenic intervention on overall bird diversity.

The present investigation recorded one globally vulnerable species, the Beautiful Nuthatch Sitta formosa. This species has been referred to as Vulnerable[C2a(i)] by BirdLife International (2010) IUCN Red List (2011) for birds, due to its small, declining and highly fragmented population size. Conservation measures have been taken for this species in adjacently located Buxa Tiger Reserve and we would like to propose NVNP to be designated for the same cause. We would also like to mention that the current investigation included a vagrant bird, Water Pipit Anthus spinoletta, anew record from this part of the world.

Our short-term study involved only a few selected patches of forests; a more intensive study might yield many more species. Detailed studies might improve the list of avian species and their characteristic distribution in different forest patches from the present location. The impact of anthropogenic alteration of the habitats in and around Neora Valley National Park also needs further intensive studies.

References

Aich, A. & S.K. Mukhopadhyay (2008). Comparison of avifauna at the edges of contrasting forest patches in Western Ghat hills of India. Ring 30(1): 5–14.

Ali, S. (1996). The Book of Indian Birds. Bombay Natural History Society, Bombay, 354pp.

Bhat, D.M. & K.S. Murali (2001). Phenology of understorey species of tropical moist forest of Western Ghats region of Uttara Kannada District in South India. Current Science 81(7): 799–805.

BirdLife International (2010). IUCN Red List for Birds. http://www.birdlife.org/. Accessed on 17 December 2010.

Champion, H.G. & S.K. Seth (1968). A Revised Survey of the Forest Types of India. Government of India, New Delhi, 404pp.

Chandrashekara, U.M., P.K. Muraleedharan & V. Sibichan (2006). Anthropogenic pressure on structure and composition of a shoal forest in Kerala. Indian Journal of Mountain Science3(1): 58–70.

Chakravarthy, A.K. & S. Sridhar (1995). Bird Diversity and Conservation. Ornithological Society of India, Bangalore, 19–31pp.

Chettri, N., D.C. Deb, E. Sharma & R. Jackson (2005). The relationship between bird communities and habitat a study along a trekking corridor in the Sikkim Himalaya. Mountain Research and Development25(3): 235–243.

Grimmett, R., C. Inskipp & T. Inskipp (1998). Birds of the Indian Subcontinent. Oxford University Press, Delhi, 888pp.

Henderson, P.A. (2003). Practical Methods in Ecology.Blackwell Publishing, USA, vii+163pp.

Islam, M.Z. & A.R. Rahmani (2004). Important Bird Area in India: Priority Sites for Conservation. IBCN, Bombay Natural History Society, BirdLife International, UK, xviii+1133pp.

IUCN (2011). IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2011.1. http://www.iucnredlist.org/. Accessed on 26 August 2011.

Kazmierczak, K. & B.V. Perlo (2000). A Field Guide to The Birds of the Indian Subcontinent. Yale University Press, 352pp.

Pandya, P.J. & K.D. Vachhrajani (2010). Birds of Mahi River estuary, Gujarat, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 2(6): 994–1000.

Rodgers, W.A., H.S. Panwar & V. B. Mathur (2002). Wildlife Protected Area Network in India: A Review (Executive summary). Wildlife Institute of India. Dehradun, 44pp.

Sutherland, W.J (2006). Ecological Census Techniques a handbook. Cambridge University Press, New York, 432pp.