Journal of Threatened Taxa |
www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 October 2020 | 12(14): 16944–16953
ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) | ISSN 0974-7893
(Print)
doi: https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.5957.12.14.16944-16953
#5957 | Received 07 April 2020 | Final
received 04 July 2020 | Finally accepted 11 September 2020
A highway to hell: a proposed,
inessential, 6-lane highway (NH173) that threatens the forest and wildlife
corridors of the Western Ghats, India
H.S. Sathya Chandra Sagar 1 & Mrunmayee
2
1,2 Wildlife
Conservation and Nature Education (WildCANE) - Jakkanahalli Post, Mallandur, Chikkamagaluru, Karnataka 577130, India
1 sathyachandrasagar@gmail.com
(corresponding author), 2 mrunmayee.amarnath@gmail.com
Abstract: A globally, extensive road
network combined with increasing vehicular traffic poses a significant threat
to local wildlife, environment, economy, and socio-politics. India, with nearly 5.9 million kilometers of road, has the second-highest road network in
the world; and has plans to exponentially increase its national highways. In this study, we use a combination of
collation of official documents, literature review, and GIS mapping to outline
the possible environmental and socio-economic impacts caused by a proposed
6-lane national highway (NH 173). This
highway is set to cut through the low elevation evergreen forests of the
central Western Ghats between Mudigere and Nelliyadi towns of Chikkamagaluru
and Dakshina Kannada districts, of Karnataka State, respectively. We further outline the insignificance of the
project and recommend workable alternatives that could be considered in the
wider public’s interest.
Keywords: Conservation, forest, India,
linear intrusion, road, roadkill, wildlife.
Editor: Anonymity requested. Date
of publication: 26 October 2020 (online & print)
Citation: Sagar, H.S.S.C. & Mrunmayee (2020). A highway to
hell: a proposed, inessential, 6-lane highway (NH173) that threatens the forest
and wildlife corridors of the Western Ghats, India. Journal of
Threatened Taxa 12(14): 16944–16953. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.5957.12.14.16944-16953
Copyright: © Sagar & Mrunmayee 2020. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
License. JoTT
allows unrestricted use, reproduction, and distribution of this article in any
medium by providing adequate credit to the author(s) and the source of publication.
Funding: We did not use
any external funding for this
study.
Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Data and materials availability: Compensation data collected using RTI Act, which was
used to create Fig. 2, has been attached in supplementary material under
Appendix 5.
Author details: H.S. Sathya
Chandra Sagar is a conservation scientist and
a field biologist. He is interested in understanding the ecological impacts of
various human activities and the effectiveness of conservation practices to
protect biodiversity in tropical forests. He is currently a graduate (PhD)
researcher at the Sound Forest Lab at the Nelson Institue and
the Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin -
Madison. Mrunmayee
is a conservationist from Chikkamagaluru of India and
the Executive Director of WildCANE, a grassroots NGO
working in the Bhadra Kudremukh landscape of
Western Ghats of India. She has been involved in conservation efforts for over
13 years in various capacities in India and is currently pursuing MPhil in
Conservation Leadership course as part of the 2020-21 cohort at the University
of Cambridge.
Author contribution: Both the authors conceived the idea, HSSCS primarily
wrote the paper and both the authors contributed to the final manuscript.
Acknowledgements: We thank all our associates for their constant
support, guidance and inputs for the manuscript. We thank Praneeth K
Sargur for translating the abstract to Kannada
language. We also thank the two anonymous reviewers for their valuable
comments.
Introduction
India has the second-highest road network in the world
with nearly 5.9 million kilometers of road (MRTH
2019). Between the years 2018 and 2019,
with 10,855km added to the existing highway network, India had a 10% increase
in national highways compared to the previous year (MRTH 2019). Even with increased fuel economy standards,
technological advancements, and continued roadway constructions, India’s
vehicular traffic is expected to grow significantly beyond the year 2050 (Dulac 2013).
Globally, such extensive road network combined with increasing vehicular
traffic has been identified as a significant threat to local wildlife,
environment, economy, socio-politics, and indigenous culture & traditions (Goosem et al. 2010; Alamgir et al. 2017).
One such road is the proposed 6-lane national highway
(NH-173) between Mudigere and Nelliyadi
towns of Chikkamagaluru and Dakshina
Kannada districts, of Karnataka State, respectively (hereafter Shishila Byrapura (SB) highway)
to connect the coastal town of Bantwal with Chitradurga in southern India, through an entirely new
alignment (NHAI 2018) (Fig. 1). The
entire project of 233km has been split into four workable packages, each under
100km (NHAI 2018). Among them is the
68.9km stretch between Mudigere and Nelliyadi, with no existing highway in the alignment. With a budget of 25 billion INR (330 million
USD at 1 USD = 75.698 INR), the project is set to connect this stretch,
currently without any motorable road between Byrapura
Village near Mudigere and Shishila
Village near Nelliyadi; where the mean elevation
changes nearly 800m, within just 21.9km (Image 1). SB highway is set to cut across contiguous
forest patches of central Western Ghats – a biodiversity hotspot and a UNESCO
world heritage site (Myers et al. 2000; WHC 2012) (Appendix 1). Here we outline the inevitable socio-economic
and environmental disaster expected to be caused by the project, its
insignificance, and the recommendation of workable alternatives.
Environmental and socio-economic impacts
The highway is set to fragment a contiguous stretch of
forest, protected under seven reserve forests (RFs), which connects Bhadra
Tiger Reserve, Kudremukha National Park, and Pushpagiri Wildlife Sanctuary (Appendix 1). Building a 30m wide highway with crash
barriers and other road safety features as proposed under the project could act
as blockades for the movement and seasonal migration of wildlife (Raman 2011;
Alamgir et al. 2017). These areas hold
one of the highest populations of Asiatic Elephants and also has been
identified as an important Tiger corridor (Appendix 2; Elephant Task Force
2012; Qureshi et al. 2014; Project Elephant Division 2017). Along with these charismatic and threatened
mega-fauna, these RFs are home to five species of birds, nine species of
reptiles, and 23 species of mammals (Appendix 4), listed under schedule I and
II of the Indian Wildlife (Protection) Act 1972, giving them the highest
protection under Indian law (WII-ENVIS 2014; IUCN 2019). In addition, this landscape hosts an array of
globally threatened and endemic species of flora and fauna (Myers et al. 2000;
UNESCO WHC 2012). The proposed highway,
with high speeding vehicles, would disrupt wildlife movement, especially of
Asiatic Elephants, potentially worsening the existing acute human-elephant
interactions in the region (Fig. 2, Appendix 5); this threatens the safety of
both the local community and wildlife (Puyravaud et
al. 2019). Opening up this relatively
undisturbed patch of forest with no current access would inevitably lead to an
increase in wildlife mortality through collision with speeding vehicles
(Baskaran & Boominathan 2010; Raman 2011) and
could provide access to poachers and smugglers to indulge in the illegal trade
of wildlife and deforestation (Wilkie et al. 2000;
Hughes 2018). The construction of a
highway has also been linked to the spreading of invasive species such as Lantana
camara and Eupatorium Chromolaena
odorata and cause forest fires due to an increase
in fuel loads from invasive alien species (Goosem et
al. 2010; Raman 2011). At the same time,
roads and highways lead to a change in animal behaviour where a few species
will be attracted to the roads for scrap food from travelers
while others would avoid regular movement, affecting their genetic diversity (Trombulak & Frissell 2000; Holderegger & Di Giulio 2010).
The area between Mudigere
and Nelliyadi that is proposed for the construction
of the SB highway lies on the high and moderate landslide susceptibility areas
(Gupta & Basu 2017) (Appendix 3). The highway is also planned to pass along the
Kapila River, one of the main feeders for the Nethravathi
River system – a major river that provides water to millions of people and
agrarian systems. Road construction,
particularly in steep landscapes are associated with increased frequency of
landslides and soil erosion (Goosem et al. 2010),
resulting in heavy pulses of sediment into streams (Beevers
et al. 2012). Thus, construction of the
SB highway would worsen the landslide susceptibility, also damaging the water
catchment of the Nethravathi River system (Gupta
& Basu 2017).
The problem would escalate during the monsoon period, causing
irreversible damage to wildlife, the local community, and economy as seen
during the monsoon of 2018 and 2019 at various parts of the Western Ghats
(Ghosh 2018; Mrunmayee & Girish 2019). Moreover, a 4-year long process of
constructing a 70km highway through the forested landscape using earthmovers
and blasting machinery, by itself, may permanently damage the area and disrupt
wildlife movement. No amount of economic
benefits, compensatory afforestation, or financial allowance can outweigh or
equal the exceptional value of these old-growth natural forests (Watson et al.
2018).
Insignificance of the project and recommended
alternatives
SB highway has been proposed for construction without
due consideration of environmental and socio-economic factors, stating that
habitat fragmentation is unavoidable; however, the proposed alignment of the
highway is parallel to two existing highways (Fig. 1); and most other roads
between Bantwal and Chitradurga,
are being widened and upgraded to national highways. Furthermore, the alternative highway
alignments that we propose are existing roads that are already being upgraded
and almost trace the proposed highway.
By tracing our proposed alignment, Nelliyadi –
Sakaleshpura – Belur – Chikkamagaluru – Chitradurga
(Fig. 3, Appendix 6), we could: a) halt the environmental and
socio-economic impacts from the newly proposed SB highway; and b) save the
needless expenditure of 25 billion INR of taxpayer’s money on an unnecessary
project.
Conclusion
Under the current global biodiversity crisis and
climate emergency, protection of natural forests and landscape is crucial now,
more than ever before (Watson et al. 2018; Lewis et al. 2019). Increasing evidence also shows that inviolate
spaces help in wildlife conservation and reduce human-wildlife conflict (Goswami et al. 2014; Srivathsa et
al. 2014). It is evident that the
construction of the proposed SB highway would lead to (a) habitat destruction
and fragmentation (Appendix 1), (b) threaten the survival of 37 species of
schedule I and II animals potentially found in the region (Appendix 4), (c)
worsen the existing acute human-elephant interactions in the region (Fig. 2),
and (d) cause an array of environmental and socio-economic disasters. We see no requirement for a parallel and a
completely new 6-lane highway between Mudigere and Nelliyadi through the old-growth and sensitive forests,
under a proposed new alignment. This is
because, there are suitable alternatives with significantly lower impacts (Fig.
3, Appendix 6), which we strongly urge the Government of India to re-examine. Considering all the potential environmental
and socio-economic impacts from the proposed SB highway, we request the
concerned authorities to take necessary actions to consider alternative
options.
For
figures, image and Appendix 1,2,3 – click here
Appendix 4. Species listed under Schedule I and II of
the Indian Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, that are found in the landscape
where the proposed Shishila Byrapura
(SB) highway section of the NH173, is set to be newly constructed.
Taxa |
Common name |
Scientific name |
Schedule |
Birds |
Great Pied Hornbill |
Buceros bicornis |
I |
Birds |
Indian Pied Hornbill |
Anthracoceros malabaricus |
I |
Birds |
Peregrine Falcon |
Falco peregrinus |
I |
Birds |
Osprey |
Pandion haliaetus |
I |
Birds |
Southern Hill Myna |
Gracula indica |
I |
Mammals |
Gaur |
Bos gaurus |
I |
Mammals |
Malabar Civet |
Viverra civettina |
I |
Mammals |
Elephant |
Elephas maximus |
I |
Mammals |
Leopard |
Panthera pardus |
I |
Mammals |
Leopard Cat |
Prionailurus bengalensis |
I |
Mammals |
Gray Slender Loris |
Loris lydekkerianus |
I |
Mammals |
Indian Mouse Deer |
Moschiola indica |
I |
Mammals |
Indian Pangolin |
Manis crassicaudata |
I |
Mammals |
Asian Small-clawed Otter |
Aonyx cinereus |
I |
Mammals |
Sloth Bear |
Melursus ursinus |
I |
Mammals |
Tiger |
Panthera tigris |
I |
Mammals |
Bonnet Macaque |
Macaca radiata |
II |
Mammals |
Dark-legged Malabar Langur |
Semnopithecus hypoleucos |
II |
Mammals |
Dhole / Asiatic Wild Dog |
Cuon alpinus |
II |
Mammals |
Brown Palm Civet |
Paradoxurus jerdoni |
II |
Mammals |
Common Palm Civet |
Paradoxurus hermaphroditus |
II |
Mammals |
Small Indian Civet |
Viverricula indica |
II |
Mammals |
Indian Giant Squirrel |
Ratufa indica |
II |
Mammals |
Jackal |
Canis aureus |
II |
Mammals |
Jungle Cat |
Felis chaus |
II |
Mammals |
Brown Mongoose |
Herpestes brachyurus |
II |
Mammals |
Common Mongoose |
Herpestes edwardsii |
II |
Mammals |
Stripe-necked Mongoose |
Herpestes vitticollis |
II |
Reptiles |
Indian Flapshell Turtle |
Lissemys punctata |
I |
Reptiles |
Large Bengal Monitor Lizard |
Varanus bengalensis |
I |
Reptiles |
Indian Python |
Python molurus |
I |
Reptiles |
Indian Chameleon |
Chamaeleo zeylanicus |
II |
Reptiles |
Checkered Keelback |
Xenochrophis piscator |
II |
Reptiles |
King Cobra |
Ophiophagus hannah |
II |
Reptiles |
Indian Rat Snake |
Ptyas mucosa |
II |
Reptiles |
Spectacled Cobra |
Naja naja |
II |
Appendix 5. The total number of compensation at the
village level, for the elephant-caused crop loss within Mudigere
Taluk of Chikkamagaluru District, given by the
Karnataka Forest Department (KFD), Government of India. These villages are part of the region through
with the proposed 6-lane highway Shishila Byrapura (SB) highway of NH173 is set to pass through. We collated the information on the
compensation number through written requests to KFD. The economic value of each compensation might
vary based on the intensity of the crop loss faced by individual farmers. At the village level, however, we have summed
the number of cases to get the total number across eight years (2010–2018),
irrespective of the economic value received.
Village names |
Total number of compensation (2010–18) |
Vurubage |
580 |
B.Hosahalli |
540 |
Kundhuru |
492 |
Gutthi |
386 |
Bankenahalli |
290 |
Byrapura |
285 |
Kogile |
242 |
Bidarahalli |
179 |
Hosakere |
175 |
Saragodu |
173 |
Kenjige |
168 |
Binnadi |
165 |
Mudhugundi |
156 |
Palguni |
135 |
Heggudlu |
121 |
Meguru |
101 |
Beranagodu |
99 |
Maddrahalli |
86 |
Mekanagadde |
85 |
Tathkola |
81 |
Tharuve |
80 |
Koove |
69 |
Byduvalli |
49 |
Hesagodu |
48 |
Darshana |
46 |
Lokavalli |
36 |
Hoysalalu |
26 |
Bettagere |
24 |
Baggasagodu |
22 |
Jogannanakere |
21 |
Kotragere |
20 |
Kasaba Banaka |
19 |
Hemmadhi |
18 |
Halike |
16 |
Indravalli |
14 |
Hanumanahalli |
11 |
Tripura |
10 |
Hadhi Oni |
10 |
Javali |
9 |
Kannagere |
9 |
Kollibylu |
7 |
Angadi |
7 |
Anajuru |
7 |
Gowdahalli |
6 |
Kelagodu |
4 |
Kelaguru |
4 |
Kademadakallu (naduvinamadakallu) |
4 |
Kasaba Baluru |
3 |
Halekote |
3 |
Koluru |
3 |
U. Hosahalli |
3 |
Gonibeedu Agrahara |
2 |
Kelluru |
2 |
G Hosalli Agrahara |
2 |
Appendix 6. A description of the alternative routes to
the proposed Shishila Byrapura
(SB) highway of NH173, using existing roads and highways that could be
upgraded/are in due for an upgrade. National highways show the existing
highways through which the proposed alternative route passes. The distance in kilometres is the distance
between Bantwal in Dakshina
Kannada District to Chitradurga in Chitradurga District, which spans the entire stretch of the
project.
|
Passing through Locations |
National Highways |
Distance (km) |
1 |
Nelliyadi - Sakaleshpura - Belur- Chikkamagaluru -Chitradurga |
75; 173 |
318 |
2 |
Nelliyadi - Sakaleshpura - Hanbal - Mudigere - Chikkamagaluru - Chitradurga |
75; 173 |
329 |
3 |
Nelliyadi - Karkala - Agumbe - Shimoga - Chitradurga |
169; 369 |
291 |
References
Alamgir, M., M.J. Campbell, S.
Sloan, M. Goosem, G.R. Clements, M.I. Mahmoud &
W.F. Laurance (2017). Economic, socio-political and environmental risks of
road development in the tropics. Current Biology 27(20): PR1130–R1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.08.067
Baskaran, N. & D. Boominathan (2010). Roadkill of animals by highway traffic in the tropical
forests of Mudumalai Tiger Reserve, southern India. Journal
of Threatened Taxa 2(3): 753–759. https://doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.o2101.753-9
Beevers, L., W. Douven, H. Lazuardi & H. Verheij (2012). Cumulative impacts of road developments in
floodplains. Transportation research part D: Transport and Environment
17(5): 398–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2012.02.005
Dulac, J. (2013). Global Land and Transport Infrastructure Requirements
- Estimating Road and Railway Infrastructure Capacity and Costs to 2050.
Available at: https://webstore.iea.org/. Last accessed on 17 December 2019.
Elephant Task Force (2012). Report of the Karnataka Elephant Task Force -
Submitted to the High Court of Karnataka. Available at: http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/.
Last accessed on 17 December 2019.
Ghosh, S. (2018). Kerala landslides: GSI advocates land use and zoning
regulations. Available at: https://india.mongabay.com/. Last accessed on 17
December 2019.
Goosem, M., E.K. Harding, G. Chester, N. Tucker & C. Harriss (2010). Roads in Rainforest: science behind the guidelines.
Reef and Rainforest Research Centre. Available at: https://www.rrrc.org.au/research_reports-html/.
Last accessed on 17 December 2019.
Goswami, V.R., D. Vasudev & M.K. Oli (2014). The importance of conflict-induced mortality for
conservation planning in areas of human-elephant co-occurrence. Biological
Conservation 176: 191–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.05.026
Gupta, T. & S. Basu (2017).
Macro-Scale (1:50,000) Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in parts of Toposheet
Nos. 48P/05 and 48P/09, Dakshina Kannada and Hassan
Districts, Karnataka. Bengaluru. Available at: https://www.gsi.gov.in/webcenter/portal/OCBIS.
Last accessed on 17 December 2019.
Holderegger, R. & M. Di Giulio (2010). The genetic effects of roads: a review of empirical
evidence. Basic Applied Ecology 11(6): 522–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2010.06.006
Hughes, A.C. (2018). Have Indo-Malaysian forests reached the end of the
road? Biological Conservation 223: 129–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.04.029
IUCN (2020). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version
2020-1. Available at: http://www.iucnredlist.org. Last accessed on 03 May 2020.
Lewis, S.L., C.E. Wheeler, E.T.A. Mitchard & A. Koch (2019). Restoring natural forests is the best way to remove
atmospheric carbon. Nature 568: 25–28. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01026-8
MRTH (2019). Annual Report 2018-19. New Delhi. Available at: https://morth.nic.in/.
Last accessed on 17 December 2019.
Mrunmayee & D.V. Girish (2019). Is climate change the only reason for flooding in the
Western Ghats? Available at: https://india.mongabay.com/. Last accessed on 17
December 2019.
Myers, N., R.A. Mittermeier, C.G.
Mittermeier, G.A.B. Da Fonseca & J. Kent (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature
403: 853-–858. https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501
NHAI (2018). Development of Economic Corridors, Feeder Routes and
Coastal Roads to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India
(Lot-3/KN/Package-2) Phase III of Chitradurga –
Mangalore Intercorridor of NH 173 – From Mudigere Hand Post at Junction of NH 73 to Nellyadi Junction at Km 270.600 of NH 75. Available at: https://parivesh.nic.in/.
Last accessed on 17 December 2019.
Project Elephant Division (2017). Synchronized Elephant Population Estimation - India
2017. Available at: http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/. Last accessed on
17 December 2019.
Puyravaud, J.-P., S. Gubbi, H. C. Poornesha
& P. Davidar. (2019). Deforestation increases frequency of incidents with
elephants (Elephas maximus). Tropical Conservation Science 12:
1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940082919865959
QGIS Development Team (2019). QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source
Geospatial Foundation Project. Available at: http://qgis.osgeo.org.
Qureshi, Q., S. Saini, P. Basu, R. Gopal, R. Raza & Y.V. Jhala
(2014). Connecting Tiger Populations for
Long-term Conservation. Dehradun. Available at: https://wii.gov.in/. Last
accessed on 17 December 2019.
Raman, T.R.S. (2011). Framing ecologically sound policy on linear
intrusions affecting wildlife habitats - Background paper for the National
Board for Wildlife. Available at: https://www.conservationindia.org/wp-content/files_mf/Linear-intrusions_Shankar-Raman.pdf.
Last accessed on 18 December 2019.
Srivathsa, A., K.K. Karanth, D. Jathanna, N.S. Kumar & K.U. Karanth
(2014). On a dhole trail: Examining
ecological and anthropogenic correlates of dhole habitat occupancy in the
Western Ghats of India. PLoS One 9(8):
e106213. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098803
Trombulak, S.C. & C.A. Frissell
(2000). Review of ecological effects of
roads on terrestrial and aquatic communities. Conservation Biology 14(1):
18–30. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99084.x
UNESCO WHC (2012). Western Ghats. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1342/.
Last accessed on 03 May 2020.
Watson, J.E.M., T. Evans, O.
Venter, B. Williams, A. Tulloch, C. Stewart, I. Thompson, J.C. Ray, K. Murray,
A. Salazar, C. McAlpine, P. Potapov, J. Walston, J.G.
Robinson, M. Painter, D. Wilkie, C. Filardi, W.F. Laurance, R.A.
Houghton, S. Maxwell, H. Grantham, C. Samper, S. Wang, L. Laestadius,
R.K. Runting, G.A. Silva-Chávez, J. Ervin & D. Lindenmayer (2018). The exceptional value of intact forest ecosystems. Nature
Ecology and Evolution 2: 599–610. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0490-x
WHC (2012). Adoption of Statements of Outstanding Universal
Value for the following World Heritage properties inscribed at the 36th session
of the World Heritage Committee. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/. Last
accessed on 17 December 2019.
WII-ENVIS (2014). Schedule Species Database. Ministry of Environment
for Climate Change, Government of India. Available at: http://www.wiienvis.nic.in/Database/ScheduleSpeciesDatabase_7969.aspx.
Last accessed on 03 May 2020.
Wilkie, D., E. Shaw, F. Rotberg,
G. Morelli & P. Auzel (2000). Roads, development, and conservation in the Congo
Basin. Conservation Biology 14: 1614–1622. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99102.x