Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26
December 2019 | 11(15): 14998–15003
Growth
rate of captive Gharials Gavialis gangeticus (Gmelin, 1789) (Reptilia: Crocodylia: Gavialidae) in Chitwan National Park, Nepal
Bed Bahadur Khadka 1 &
Ashish Bashyal 2
1 Gharial
Conservation and Breeding Center, Chitwan National
Park, Kasara, Chitwan, Nepal.
2 Biodiversity
Conservancy Nepal, Manigram, Rupandehi
32903, Nepal.
1 bed.khadka@gmail.com,
2 a.bashyal@bioconnepal.org (corresponding author)
doi: https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.5491.11.15.14998-15003
Editor: Raju Vyas, Vadodara, Gujarat, India. Date
of publication: 26 December 2019 (online & print)
Manuscript details: #5491 | Received 24 October 2019
| Final received 05 December 2019 | Finally accepted 09 December 2019
Citation: Khadka, B.B. & A. Bashyal (2019). Growth rate of captive Gharials Gavialis gangeticus
(Gmelin, 1789) (Reptilia: Crocodylia: Gavialidae) in
Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Journal of Threatened Taxa 11(15): 14998–15003. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.5491.11.15.14998-15003
Copyright: © Khadka & Bashyal
2019. Creative
Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
JoTT allows unrestricted use, reproduction,
and distribution of this article in any medium by adequate credit to the
author(s) and the source of publication.
Funding: None.
Competing interests: The authors declare no competing
interests.
Author details: Bed Bahadur Khadka is an Assistant Conservation
Officer and In-charge of Gharial Conservation and Breeding Center at Chitwan
National Park. He has wide experience in wetland and freshwater ecology and has
been studying Gharials for last 15 years.
Ashish Bashyal
is a co-founder of Biodiversity Conservancy Nepal—a non-profit dedicated to
wildlife conservation in Nepal. He has
been studying genetics and ecology of crocodilians including Gharials since
2009.
Author contribution: BK and AB conceptualized and designed the study. BK collected data and
AB performed data analysis. BK and AB prepared the manuscript.
Acknowledgements:
We thank Department of National
Parks and Wildlife Conservation, Chitwan National Park and staffs of the GCBC
for their co-operation. We are grateful to Charlie Manolis
and anonymous reviewers for improving the quality of this manuscript.
Abstract: Gharials Gavialis gangeticus have been reared in ex situ facilities in
the Gharial Conservation and Breeding Center (GCBC)
in Chitwan National Park of Nepal since the 1980s. There remains a paucity of detailed
information concerning their growth rates, particularly with respect to
season. We randomly selected 20 gharials
(45 months old) in the GCBC, tagged them, and recorded total length (TL) and
weight over three warm (April–September) and two cold (October–March) seasons
between 01 April 2013 and 30 September 2015.
We also recorded amounts of fish consumed by these gharials every month
over the 30-month period. On average per
season, the gharials grew by 9.48±3.63 cm (1.58cm/month) in length and gained
2.61±1.14 kg (0.43kg/month). Growth
rates were significantly higher during warm seasons. The highest increase in both length (mean=
21.2±8.61 cm) and weight (mean =5.59±2.12 kg) occurred during the first warm
season (April 2013–September 2013) of the study, and annual growth rate was
also highest during the first year. Our
data indicated strong correlation between mean length and body weight. A total of 2,103.9kg fish was consumed by 20
gharials over 30 months, for a mean consumption of 3.5kg fish per individual
per month. Mean fish consumption was
also significantly higher during warm (96.99±37.35 kg) versus cold (29.83±17.09
kg) seasons. Survival rate was
100%. Our findings establish baseline
data for growth and feeding rates of captive gharials that will be useful in
making management decisions in captive breeding and rearing facilities.
Keywords: Captive breeding, feeding, hatchlings, Narayani River, Rapti River,
total length.
Abbreviations: GCBC—Gharial Conservation and Breeding Center | NP–National Park | TL–Total length.
INTRODUCTION
Gharials Gavialis gangeticus are Critically Endangered crocodilians
currently distributed in among 14 widely-spaced locations in India and Nepal
(Lang et al. 2019). In Nepal this
species occurs in the Karnali and Babai
rivers in Bardia National Park (NP) and the Narayani and Rapti rivers in
Chitwan NP (Fig. 1). Major threats are
habitat destruction and alteration, water extraction, construction of dams and
barrages, mortality in fishing nets and pollution (Lang et al. 2019). Gharial populations were reduced by more than
90% throughout their range, including Nepal, between 1930 and 1980 (Stevenson
& Whitaker 2010). In response to
this crisis, the Government of Nepal initiated an ex situ conservation program
in Chitwan NP by establishing the Gharial Conservation and Breeding Center (GCBC) in 1978 (Fig. 1). The main goal of the GCBC has been to
reinforce and maintain viable populations of gharials in situ (Maskey 1989; Khadka 2010).
Scientific information on every aspect of captive breeding, incubating
and rearing is critical to ensure efficient conservation programs (Maskey 1989; Ballouard et al.
2010). Although updated information is
available on some aspects of nesting and reproduction of gharials in the GCBC (Ballouard et al. 2010; Khadka 2010, 2013), there is a
knowledge gap concerning growth and feeding
rates of captive animals in Nepal.
Historic information on survival, growth and feeding of hatchlings was
reported by Maskey (1989), but there is no recent
information available. To address this
knowledge gap and inform management actions, we investigated and established
baseline on growth and feeding rates of captive gharials in GCBC (Images 1
& 2).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study Area
This study was conducted at GCBC facilities in Chitwan
NP (27.400–27.813 0N and 83.880–84.830 0E; datum= WGS84;
Fig. 1). Chitwan NP covers an area of 953km2 and is located in
Chitwan and Nawalparasi districts in south-central
Nepal. It has a sub-tropical climate
that can be broadly divided into three seasons: warm (March–May), monsoon
(June–September), and cold (October–February) (Maskey
1989). Chitwan NP is drained by two
major rivers (the Narayani and the Rapti), in which both Gharials and Mugger Crocodiles Crocodylus palustris
occur.
Methods
GCBC collects Gharial eggs
from the Narayani and Rapti
rivers annually for incubation in semi-natural conditions. Hatchlings are reared for up to five years
until they attain around 1.5 m total length (TL; distance from anterior tip of
the snout to the posterior tip of the tail), and eventually released into
various rivers within their geographic range.
GCBC has released 1,465 Gharials between 1981 and March 2019 in the Narayani, Rapti, Karnali, Babai, and Koshi rivers (Bed Dhakal, pers.
comm. 06.vii.2019).
We randomly selected 20 Gharials which had hatched
between the first and second week of June 2009, and tagged them with uniquely
numbered plastic cattle tags attached to one of the vertical tail scutes. Since our
objective was not to estimate growth rates between sexes, we did not identify
sex of these Gharials. Gharials were
thus 45 months old when the study started on 01 April 2013. We reared the selected Gharials together in a
separate enclosure of 9 x 7 m. The
enclosure was bedded with sand, and contained a pond (6m long, 3m wide and
1.25m deep) and did not have any shade.
For the purposes of this study, and taking into account the effect of
temperature on crocodilian metabolism, we divided 12 month-periods into two
seasons—warm (April–September) and cold (October–March). Fish, primarily comprised of Oreochromis
spp., Puntius spp., Cirrhinus mrigala, and Gudusia
chapra was fed to the experimental group for the
duration of the study (01 April 2013–30
September 2015). The amount of fish
offered to the group was based on decades of experience of rearing Gharials in
GCBC. The amount of fish fed out
was weighed, and amount that was uneaten was deduced to estimate amount of fish
consumed by Gharials. We determined
average fish consumption over a month by dividing the weight of consumed fish
in that month by total number of Gharials.
In April and September each year, we measured TL using a flexible
measuring tape to the nearest cm, and recorded body weight using a spring
balance to the nearest gram.
We performed data analysis using Deducer
package (Fellows 2012) in R (R Core Team 2018) and presented mean values along
with standard deviation. We performed
paired t-test and student’s t-test wherever applicable to test for statistical
significance. We also performed linear
regression analysis to test for association between TL and weight of
Gharials. We prepared the map on ArcGIS
10.3.
RESULTS
At the start of the study (01 April 2013) Gharials
ranged 140–167 cm in TL (mean= 150.3±8.09 cm) and 5.6–10.5 kg in weight (mean=
7.49±1.35 kg) (Table 1; Fig. 2).
Considering mean TL of 43.71cm and mean weight of 100g of 100 one-month
old Gharial hatchlings (Bed Khadka unpub.),
they had thus grown around 96.29–123.29 cm in TL (mean= 106.59 cm) and 5.5–10.4
kg in weight (mean= 7.39 kg) since hatching, equivalent to mean growth rates of
around 2.13–2.73 cm/month (mean= 2.36 cm/month) and 0.12–0.22 kg/month (mean=
0.16 kg/month) in TL and weight, respectively.
Similarly, by the end of the study (30 September 2015) Gharials ranged
from 169–229 cm in TL (mean= 197.7±18.15 cm) and 11.5–30 kg in weight (mean=
20.55±6.29 kg) (Table 1; Fig. 2) and they had thus grown around 29–62 cm in TL
(mean= 47.40±18.18 cm) and 5.9–19.5 kg in weight (mean= 13.06±5.71 kg) in 30 months
duration (Table 2), equivalent to mean growth rates of around 1.58 cm/month and
0.43 kg/month in TL and weight, respectively.
We measured seasonal growth in Gharials in unequal
numbers of warm (n=3) and cold (n=2) seasons.
On average, Gharials grew by 9.48±3.63 cm per season (Table 2) and mean
increase in TL was higher during warm than cold season (One tailed t-test; t=
9.53, df = 19, P<0.001). On average, Gharials gained weight by
2.61±1.14 kg per season (Table 2) and gained more weight during warm than cold
season (One-tailed t-test; t= 10.64, df= 19,
P<0.001). Our data also allowed
annual growth to be calculated for at least two different 12-month periods
(Table 2), each including one warm and one cold season. The annual growth rate was 1.98 cm/month and
0.51 kg/month for length and weight respectively for 2013–2014. Similarly, annual growth rate was 0.85
cm/month and 0.17 kg/month for length and weight respectively for 2014–2015. Mean change in TL of Gharials either
increased or remained constant between seasons, while mean change in weight
decreased in some Gharials during cold seasons (Table 2). There was a strong correlation between mean
TL and body weight (r2 = 0.95; F1, 18 = 327.1,
P<0.001). Twenty Gharials
consumed a total of 2,103.9kg fish over 30 months period with a mean of 3.5kg
fish consumed per Gharial per month (Table 3).
Mean fish consumption was significantly higher (One tailed t-test;
t=6.65, df= 25.47, P<0.001) for warm than cold
periods; fish consumption during warm season was more than threefold higher
than for cold. While Gharials exhibited
considerable variation in their growth, survival rate was 100% throughout the
duration of the study.
DISCUSSION
Growth rates have been
studied on some species of crocodilians, but similar information on Gharials is
largely lacking. Although historic
accounts on growth and feeding rates for captive Gharials in Nepal is provided
by Maskey (1989), we did not find any similar studies
on Gharials in India, to the best of our knowledge. Maskey (1989)
reported growth rate in both weight and TL of Gharial hatchlings in captivity
was higher in warm than in cold periods. The same study also reported a strong
correlation between the rates of increase in body weight and TL of Gharial
hatchlings (Maskey 1989). Similarly, fish consumption rates of Gharials
were reported to be up to 2.5 times greater in warm than in cold by Maskey (1989). These
findings on growth and feeding rates of Gharials corroborate with our
finding. Growth is a product of food
intake and bioenergetic needs which in turn is mediated by temperature (Maskey 1989).
Various studies have
suggested that growth rate in crocodilians can vary among species as well as
within the same species from different geographical regions, age groups and sex
(Thorbjarnarson 1988; Gorzula
& Seijas 1989; Saalfeld
et al. 2008; Barrios-Quiroz et al. 2012; Balaguera-Reina
et al. 2015). We estimated growth rate
in TL between 0.73–2.76 cm/month (mean= 1.58 cm/month) for Gharials. Growth rate in TL of Spectacled Caimans Caiman crocodilus was reported between 2–2.6 cm/month during the first
year of life (Gorzula & Seijas
1989). Growth rate in TL of American
Crocodile Crocodylus acutus
hatchlings in wild was reported to vary between Haiti (3.9 cm/month) (Thorbjarnarson 1988) and in Panama (0.9–4.8 cm/month)
(Balaguera-Reina et al. 2015). Similarly, growth rate in TL of American
Alligators Alligator mississippiensis was also
reported to vary between 2.7 cm/month (for individuals with TL<50 cm when
captured) and 2.3 cm/month (for individuals with TL between 50–125 cm when
captured) in wild (Saalfeld et al. 2008). Growth rate is also observed to vary between
different age groups in Gharials in captivity (Bed Khadka Unpub.;
Maskey 1989).
One month old Gharial hatchlings (mean TL= 43.71±1.40 cm; range=40.1–47
cm; n=100) showed mean growth rate of 2.7cm/month over the period of 109 days
(Bed Khadka Unpub.) which was higher than the mean
growth rate reported in this study. It
should, however, also be noted that growth rates in crocodilians are typically
higher in captivity than in wild.
Relation between temperature and growth rate is reported in other
species of crocodilians as well. For
instance, Joanen & McNease
(1987) showed that growth rates in American Alligators could be doubled by
optimizing temperature throughout the year.
Similarly, Webb et al. (1978) showed that growth rate in Saltwater
Crocodiles Crocodylus porosus
was higher in the wet-hot season than in the dry-cold season in Australia and
growth rate decreased as body size increased.
Gharials are reared in captive facilities across Nepal
and India and held at zoos throughout the world. Our findings establish baseline growth and
feeding rates for captive Gharials. Such
information will be helpful in optimizing feeding and rearing practice for
Gharials in captivity.
Table 1. Mean total length and weight of 20 Gharials
recorded with respect to warm and cold seasons from April 2013–September 2015.
Date of measurement |
Total length (cm) |
Weight (kg) |
||
Mean |
Range |
Mean |
Range |
|
01.iv.2013 |
150.3±8.09 |
140–167 |
7.49±1.35 |
5.6–10.5 |
30.ix.2013 |
171.5±10.01 |
156–189 |
13.07±3.12 |
9–20 |
01.iv.2014 |
174.1±11.17 |
158–194 |
13.65±3.62 |
8.5–22 |
30.ix.2014 |
182.65±15.76 |
159–208 |
16.6±4.23 |
10–25 |
01.iv.2015 |
184.35±14.77 |
163–208 |
15.8±5.02 |
8.5–27.5 |
30.ix.2015 |
197.7±18.15 |
169–229 |
20.55±6.29 |
11.5–30 |
Table 2. Mean change in total length and weight of 20
Gharials with respect to warm and cold seasons from April 2013–September 2015.
Duration |
Season |
Change
in total length (cm) |
Change
in weight (kg) |
||
Mean |
Range |
Mean |
Range |
||
iv.2013–ix.2013 |
Warm |
21.2±8.61 |
3–36 |
5.58± 2.12 |
2.8–10 |
x.2013–iii.2014 |
Cold |
2.60±2.19 |
0–8 |
0.57±1.11 |
-1.5–2.5 |
iv.2014–ix.2014 |
Warm |
8.55±7.42 |
1–30 |
2.95±2.13 |
0–8 |
x.2014–iii.2015 |
Cold |
1.70±1.89 |
0–7 |
-0.8±2.47 |
-6.5–7.5 |
iv.
2015–ix.2015 |
Warm |
13.35±6.77 |
2–24 |
4.75±2.90 |
1–10.5 |
iv.2013–iii.2014 |
|
23.80
±9.84 |
5–39 |
6.16
±2.75 |
2.3–12 |
iv.2014–iii.2015 |
|
10.25±6.79 |
1–30 |
2.15±3.27 |
-2–14.5 |
Warm
seasons |
|
4.30±2.8 |
0–11 |
-0.22±2.87 |
-6.5–8.5 |
Cold season |
|
43.10±17.97 |
18–81 |
13.28±4.92 |
7.5–21.5 |
Overall |
|
47.40±18.18 |
22–83 |
13.06±5.71 |
5–22.5 |
Table 3. Amount of fish consumed by 20 Gharials in
warm and cold seasons from April 2013–September 2015.
Duration |
Season |
Fish
consumed(kg) |
|
||
Total |
Mean per month |
Range |
N* |
||
iv.2013–ix.2013 |
Warm |
525.9 |
87.65±38.65 |
32.4–138 |
6 |
x.2013–iii.2014 |
Cold |
161.5 |
26.91±23.42 |
8.5–64 |
6 |
iv.2014–ix.2014 |
Warm |
522.5 |
87.08±34.06 |
41.5–145 |
6 |
x.2014–iii.2015 |
Cold |
196.5 |
32.75±8.58 |
24.5–45.5 |
6 |
iv.
2015–ix.2015 |
Warm |
697.5 |
116.25±37.71 |
69.5–162.5 |
6 |
Cold
seasons |
|
358 |
29.83±17.09 |
8.5– 64 |
12 |
Warm
seasons |
|
1745.9 |
96.99±37.35 |
32.4–162.5 |
18 |
Overall |
|
2103.9 |
70.13±45.26 |
8.5–162.5 |
30 |
For
figures & images - - click here
REFERENCES
Balaguera-Reina, S. A., M. Venegas-Anaya, O.I. Sanjur, H.A. Lessios & L.D.
Densmore (2015). Reproductive ecology and
hatchling growth rates of the American Crocodile (Crocodylus
acutus) on Coiba
Island, Panama. South American Journal of Herpetology 10:
10–23.
Ballouard, J.M., P. Priol, J. Oison, A. Ciliberti & A. Cadi
(2010). Does reintroduction stabilize the
population of the critically endangered Gharial (Gavialis
gangeticus) in Chitwan National Park, Nepal? Aquatic
Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 20: 756–761.
Barrios-Quiroz, G., G.
Casas-Andreu & A.H. Escobedo-Galván (2012). Sexual size dimorphism and allometric growth of Morelet’s crocodiles in captivity. Zoological Science 29(3):
198–204. https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.29.198
Fellows, I. (2012). Deducer: A Data Analysis
GUI for R. Journal of Statistical Software 49(8): 1-15. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v49/i08/
Gorzula, S. & A.E. Seijas
(1989). The Common Caiman, pp. 44–61. In:
Crocodiles: their ecology, management and the conservation. IUCN, Gland,
Switzerland, 308pp.
Joanen, T. & L. McNease (1987). Alligator farming research in Louisiana, USA, pp.
329–340. In: Webb G.J.W., S.C. Manolis & P.J.
Whitehead (eds.). Wildlife Management: Crocodiles and Alligators. Surrey
Beatty & Sons, Sydney, Australia, 552pp.
Khadka, B.B. (2010). Gharial hatching status in 2010, Chitwan National
Park, Nepal. Crocodile Specialist Group Newsletter 29(3): 16–17.
Khadka, B.B. (2013). Effect of weather on hatching success of Gharial in
Chitwan National Park. Crocodile Specialist Group Newsletter 32(4):
5–7.
Lang, J.W., S. Chowfin
& J.P. Ross (2019). Gavialis gangeticus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019:
e.T8966A3148543; https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-1.RLTS.T8966A3148543.en
Maskey, T.M. (1989). Movement and survival of captive-reared gharials, Gavialis gangeticus,
in the Narayani river, Nepal. Ph.D. Dissertation,
University of Florida, USA, xiv+187pp.
R Core Team (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical
computing. R Foundation for Statistical
Computing, Vienna, Austria.
Saalfeld, D.T., K.K. Webb, W.C. Conway, G.E. Calkins &
J.P. Duguay (2008). Growth and
Condition of American Alligators (Alligator mississippiensis)
in an Inland Wetland of East Texas. Southeastern
Naturalist 7(3): 541–550. https://doi.org/10.1656/1528-7092-7.3.541
Stevenson, C. & R. Whitaker
(2010). Indian Gharial Gavialis gangeticus,
pp. 139–143. In: Manolis, S.C. & C. Stevenson (eds). Crocodiles: Status Survey and Conservation Action
Plan. Crocodile Specialist Group, Australia, 143pp.
Thorbjarnarson, J. B. (1988). The status and ecology of the American crocodile in
Haiti. Bulletin of the Florida State Museum, Biological Sciences 33:
1–86.
Webb, G.J.W., H. Messel, J.
Crawford & M.J. Yerbury (1978). Growth rates of Crocodylus
porosus (Reptilia: Crocodilia) from Arnhem Land, Northern Australia. Australian
Wildlife Research 5: 385–399. https://dx.doi.org/10.1071/WR9780385