Journal of
Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 December 2019 | 11(15):
15043–15046
Efficacy of oxyclozanide and
levamisole treatment on the gastrointestinal parasites in captive Lions Panthera leo
Dhareppa Ganager
1, Gotakanapura Sanjeevamurthy
Mamatha 2, Asoor Muralidhara
3, Nagappa Lakkundi
Jaya 4 & Beechagondahalli Papanna Shivashankar 5
1,3
Wildlife Unit, Veterinary College, Hebbal, Bengaluru & Institute of
Wildlife Veterinary Research, Doddaluvara, Kodagu,
Karnataka 571234, India.
2,4 Department
of Veterinary Parasitology, Veterinary College, Hebbal, Bengaluru, Karnataka
560024, India.
5 Institute of
Animal Health & Veterinary Biologicals, Hebbal, Bengaluru, Karnataka
560024, India.
Karnataka
Veterinary Animal & Fisheries
Sciences University, Bidar.
1 dganager8@gmail.com,
2 drmamathags@gmail.com (corresponding author), 3 asoormurali@rediffmail.com,
4 jayalakkundi@yahoo.in, 5 shivashankarpatho@gmail.com
doi: https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.4859.11.15.15043-15046
Editor: Rajeshkumar G. Jani, Anand Agricultural University, Anand,India Date of publication: 26 December 2019
(online & print)
Manuscript details: #4859 | Received 29 January 2019 | Final received 30 November 2019 |
Finally accepted 06 December 2019
Citation: Ganager, D., G.S. Mamatha, A. Muralidhara, N.L. Jaya & B.P. Shivashankar
(2019). Efficacy of oxyclozanide and levamisole treatment on
the gastrointestinal parasites in captive Lions Panthera
leo. Journal of Threatened Taxa 11(15): 15043–15046. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.4859.11.15.15043-15046
Copyright: © Ganager et al. 2019. Creative
Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
JoTT allows unrestricted use, reproduction,
and distribution of this article in any medium by adequate credit to the
author(s) and the source of publication.
Funding: None.
Competing interests: The authors declare no competing
interests.
Acknowledgements: The facilities provided through Centre of Advanced
Faculty Training, ICAR, New Delhi to carry out this research work and the
support extended by the Veterinary Officers during collection of faecal
material is gratefully acknowledged.
Abstract: A study was carried out to determine the efficacy of anthelmintics on gastrointestinal parasites in lions under
captivity at Bannerghatta Biological Park (Bengaluru), Sri Chamarajendra
Zoological Garden (Mysuru) and Tiger-Lion Safari Tyavarekoppa
(Shivamogga) during the period from January to June, 2018. Out of 20 faecal
samples subjected to qualitative and quantitative methods, 66.6% were found
positive for eggs of Ancylostoma spp.,
60.0% for Toxascaris leonina,
20.0% for Spirometra spp. and 13.3% for Balantidium
coli cysts with an overall infection rate of 75.0%. A combination of oxyclozonide
6% w/v and levamisole 3% w/v (Neozide plus) at the
rate of 1ml per 4kg body weight revealed egg per gram counts for Ancylostoma spp., T. leonina
and Spirometra spp. to be reduced from 100,
11,450 ± 11,250 and 100 to zero respectively on subsequent 3, 7, 10 and 21 days
post treatment and proved to be cent per cent effective.
Keywords: Anthelmintics, efficacy, gastrointestinal parasites, Lions.
In captive wild carnivores, the change in the
environment and living conditions
influences the ecology of the animal and might increase the
susceptibility to many of the diseases, viz., bacterial, viral, parasitic and rickketsial diseases (Goossens et
al. 2005). Especially, carnivores kept
in captivity in zoos usually suffer from several parasitic infections, such as
from nematodes, cestodes, trematodes, and protozoans. In particular, among nematodes ascarids constitute the major parasitic infection in wild
carnivores and are established as a problem in most of the zoos throughout the
world (Sayid & Mohammed 1997–1998).
Among parasitic diseases, particularly helminthic
infections have a greater ramification and significant impact on host survival,
growth and reproduction through direct and indirect pathological effects. The subclinical infections may not cause any
immediate alarming signs of disease but in the long course, they would render
the animals susceptible to other concurrent infections (Muraleedharan
et al. 1990). In addition,
gastrointestinal parasites of wild carnivores include zoonotic species to
humans and may raise public health concern (Acharjyo
2004).
Though helminthic diseases are a major constraint to
zoo animals, the occurrence of parasitic infections may vary depending on the
type of husbandry practices, viz., nutritional status, physiological condition,
implementation of disease control programmes, and
treatment administered (Singh et al. 2006).
In most of the zoological gardens, the prevention and control of
gastrointestinal parasitic infections is mainly dependent on the short term
deworming programmes.
A range of antiparasitic drugs has been used to reduce parasitism in
wild animal populations. In particular,
most drug treatment experiments using anthelmintic has been carried out by
targeting nematode infections (Pedersen & Fenton 2015). The commonly used anthelmintic includes
thiabendazole, piperazine citrate and adipate, pyrantel pamoate, albendazole,
fenbendazole, levamisole, and ivermectin.
Many studies have provided information on the effects of treatment on
the target parasite, assessed either in terms of the prevalence of infection
(proportion of hosts infected), mean parasitic abundance (mean number of
parasites or parasitic eggs shed per host), or mean parasite intensity (mean
number of parasite eggs shed per infected host).
The regular examination of faeces,
assessment of parasitic load, and the assessment of drug efficacy, however, are
not frequently carried out in many zoological parks or gardens. Therefore, the present study was undertaken
to determine the efficacy of anthelmintic on the gastrointestinal parasites in
captive lions.
Material and Methods
Study area
The study area included Bannerghatta Biological Park
(BBP) which is located 22km south of Bengaluru in the hills of the Anekal range with 26356.16 hectares area with zoo, a pet
corner, an animal rescue centre, a butterfly
enclosure, an aquarium, a snake house, and a safari park. Sri Chamarajendra
Zoological Garden (SCZG) is around 63.53 hectares located near the palace in
Mysuru, is one of the oldest zoos in India and is home to a wide range of
species (168). Tiger-Lion Safari Tyavarekoppa (TLST), Shivamogga is Karnataka’s second
safari park, after BBP with an area of 250ha.
Collection of samples
During this study, a representative faecal sample of about 10g was collected from each
enclosure and the methodology was followed as per Soulsby
(1982) and Taylor et al. (2015). However, in Dehuri
et al. (2013), 2g of faeces was collected and also
for the methods the reference Soulsby (1982) is
cited. A total of 20 faecal
samples were collected from lions under
captivity at BBP (12), SCZG (4), and TLST (4) during the period January–June
2018. The faecal
samples were examined macroscopically and were subjected to microscopic
examination by using qualitative (direct and concentration) and quantitative
(Mc Master’s) methods to assess the severity of different parasitic infections
(Soulsby 1982; Taylor et al. 2015). The parasitic eggs/larvae/cysts/oocysts were
identified based on the standard morphological characters (Soulsby
1982; Zajac & Conboy 2012; Bowman 2014).
Determination of anthelmintic efficacy
An anthelminthic efficacy against gastrointestinal
parasitic infections was determined based on the eggs per gram (EPG) of faeces using Mc Master’s method. During this study, a combination of oxyclozonide 6% w/v and levamisole 3% w/v (Neozide plus) @ 1ml per 4kg body weight in meat was
administered during May 2018. The EPG
was carried out during pretreatment and on 3rd, 7th, 10th,
and 21st days post treatment.
The percentage of efficacy of drug was determined by the following
formula:
Efficacy % = (Pre treatment
EPG – Post treatment EPG / Pre treatment EPG) x 100
Statistical analysis
The statistical analysis of data was carried out by
Fisher’s exact and one way ANOVA tests using graph pad prism software, version
5.01.
Results
During this study, out of 20 faecal
samples examined by direct and concentration methods, 15 samples were found to
be positive for helminthic infections of Ancylostoma
spp. (66.6%), T. leonina (60.0%), Spirometra spp. (20%), and Balantidium coli
(13.3%) cysts, with an overall infection rate of 75%. In BBP, SCZG, and TLST, 10 (83.3%), four
(100%), and one (25.0%) samples were found to be positive for gastrointestinal
parasitic eggs/cysts, respectively (Table 1).
The statistical differences between the infections in the different locations
were found to be nonsignificant at P< 0.05.
The mixed infections of Ancylostoma spp.
and T. leonina (5), Ancylostoma
spp. and Spirometra sp. (2), and Ancylostoma spp. and B. coli (2) were commonly observed with an
overall infection rate of 70%.
Anthelmintic efficacy
The average mean pretreatment EPG counts was found to
be 100 ± 0 for Ancylostoma spp., 11,450 ±
11,250 for T. leonina and 100 ± 0 for Spirometra spp.
Subsequently, after 3, 7, 10 and 21 days post treatment, the EPG counts
were reduced to zero. An examination of faecal samples was negative for gastrointestinal parasitic
infections with cent per cent efficacy on 21 days post treatment.
Discussion
During this study, one faecal
sample from TLST and two from SCZG were found to be positive for eggs of Ancylostoma spp. and T. leonina with very low parasitemia (EPG = 0). Therefore, anthelmintic efficacy was carried
out at BBP. All the animals irrespective
of the infection and whether the animals were positive or negative were
administered a combination of oxyclozonide (6% w/v),
a broad spectrum antitrematodal drug and levamisole
(3% w/v) which has activity against nematodes and an immunostimulant
at the rate of 1ml per 4kg body weight.
In the present study, subsequently after 3rd, 7th,
10th and 21st day post treatment, the EPG counts were
reduced to zero per cent and the faecal samples were
negative for infections indicating 100% efficacy. During this study, though the Spirometra infection was recorded, the
animals were not administered with anticestodal
drugs. Therefore, based on the present
findings zoo veterinarians received the suggestion that wild carnivores under
captivity should be regularly dewormed with anthelmintic only after an
examination of faecal samples for the presence or
absence of gastrointestinal parasitic infections to avoid unnecessary dosing
with anthelmintic thereby reducing the cost of treatment and development of
resistance in future. Many authors, however,
have reported varied efficacy with different modes of action of anthelmintic—Sayid & Mohammad (1997–1998) at Khartoum Zoo, Sudan
reported complete clearance of infection
with piperazine but incomplete clearance of parasites on 28th day
post treatment with thiabendazole in lions, leopards, jackal, and dwarf
mongoose infected with T. leonina; Sur et al.
(2000) treated lions infected with Toxocara
and Ancylostoma with ivermectin injection (Ivomec) @ 1ml per 50kg body weight and recorded an absence
of eggs on the 7th day post treatment; Kumar et al. (2005) treated
22 lions which showed the occurrence of Toxocara
eggs in the faeces with piperazine @ 220mg per kg
orally at M.C. Zoological Park, Chhatbir, Patiala
District, Punjab and later, with ivermectin at the dose rate of 1ml per 50kg
body weight subcutaneously twice at one week intervals for piperazine resistant
T. cati and observed the egg count to be
reduced by 98.71%; Moudgil et al. (2017) reported that fenbendazole @ 10mg per
kg body weight once daily for three consecutive days was ineffective to
eliminate the infection in Asiatic Lions infected with T. leonina and observed eggs reduction by 69.35% at day 3
post treatment with three consecutive treatment schedule, however, extended
period of time with fenbendazole for five days and ivermectin @ 100µg per kg
body weight once daily for three alternative days resulted in eggs reduction by
95.34% and 95.74%, respectively, and proved to be effective.
The differences in the efficacy of each anthelmintic
drug may be attributed to the fact that the vehicle of drug to captive wild
animals (especially wild felines) play an important role in administering exact
dosage the reason could be that the total dosage of anthelmintic drug cannot be
calculated according to their body weight (Moudgil et al. 2017).
In conclusion, though helminthic and protozoan
infections are known to occur in captive wild carnivores, the control measures
undoubtedly would depend upon several factors.
Further, the rationale behind the control of parasitic infections in
wild carnivores of Indian zoos presumes that in as much as each carnivore is
infected and that the zoo environment cannot be changed frequently because of
space confinement, overcrowding, and the movement of keepers from one enclosure
to another and the presence of stray dogs and cats which may act as a source of
infection (Acharjyo 2004). The present findings indicated that quarterly
deworming (once in three months) of all the animals and examination of faecal samples before and after deworming should be
followed regularly to confirm the efficacy of treatment. In addition, a change of anthelmintic should
be instituted from time to time to avoid drug resistance in captive wild
carnivores.
Table 1. Number of faecal samples positive for
gastrointestinal parasites in lions at different locations.
|
Locations |
No. of animals examined |
No.
of animals infected |
No. of positive samples |
|||
Ancylostoma spp. |
T. leonina |
Spirometra spp. |
Balantidium coli |
||||
1 |
Bannerghatta Biological Park, Bengaluru |
12 |
10 (83.3%) |
8 (80.0%) |
6 (60.0%) |
3 (10.0%) |
2 (20.0%) |
2 |
Sri Chamarajendra
Zoological Garden, Mysuru |
4 |
4 (100.0%) |
2 (50.0%) |
2 (50.0%) |
0 |
0 |
3 |
Tiger-Lion Safari Tyavarekoppa,
Shivamogga |
4 |
1 (25.0%) |
0 |
1 (25.0%) |
0 |
0 |
|
Total |
20 |
15 (75.0%) |
10 (66.6%) |
9 (60.0%) |
3 (20.0%) |
2 (20.0%) |
References
Acharjyo, L.N. (2004). Helminthiasis in captive wild carnivores and its
control in India. Zoos’ Print Journal 19(7): 1540–1543. https://doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.ZPJ.1001.1540-3
Bowman, D.D. (2014). Georgi’s Parasitology for Veterinarians, 10th
Edition. W.B. Sounders, Philadelphia, 496pp.
Goossens, E., P. Dorny, J. Boomker, F. Vercammen & Vercruysse
(2005). A 12-month survey of the
gastrointestinal helminths of antelopes, gazelles and giraffids kept at two
zoos in Belgium. Veterinary Parasitology 127(3–4): 303–312.
Kumar, A., L.D. Singla, N. Singla, G.S. Aulak & J. Singh (2005). Management of piperazine resistant Toxocariosis with Ivermectin in Lions (Panthera
leo). Journal of Parasitic Diseases 29(2):
156–160.
Moudgil, A.D., L.D. Singla & M.P. Singh (2017).
Internal transcribed spacer sequence based molecular confirmation and drug
efficacy assessment against Toxascaris leonina (Linstow, 1909)
infection in Asiatic Lions (Panthera leo persica). Helminthologia
54(2): 152–156.
Muraleedharan, K., I. Vasanthi, K.S.
Ziauddin & K. Srinivasan (1990). A survey of gastrointestinal parasites of animals of
Zoological Gardens at Mysore. Mysore Journal of Agricultural Sciences 24: 250–256.
Pedersen, A.B. & A. Fenton (2015). The role of antiparasite
treatment experiments in assessing the impact of parasites on wildlife. Trends
in Parasitology 31(5): 200–211.
Sayid, A.S.A. & B.A. Mohammed (1997–1998). Prevalence and treatment of Toxoascaris leonina
in naturally infected carnivores in old Khartoum Zoo. The Sudan Journal of
Veterinary Research 15: 31–38.
Singh, P., M.P. Gupta, L.D. Singla, N. Singh &
D.R. Sharma (2006). Prevalence
and chemotherapy of gastrointestinal helminthic infections in wild
carnivores of Mahendra Choudhury Zoolgoical
Park, Punjab. Journal of Veterinary Parasitology 20: 17–23
Soulsby, E.J.L. (1982). Helminths, arthropods and protozoa of domesticated
animals. VII Edition. Bailliere Tindall, London, 809pp.
Sur, S.K., L.G. Ghosh & D. Chatterjee (2000). Use of ivermectin in tigers for removing intestinal
parasites. Zoos’ Print Journal 16(1): 410. https://doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.ZPJ.16.1.410
Taylor, M.A., R.L. Coop & R.L. Wall (2015). A Text Book of Veterinary Parasitology. 4th
Edition. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK., 799pp.
Zajac, A.M. & G.A. Conboy (2012). A Text Book of Veterinary Clinical Parasitology.
8th Edition. Wiley-Blackwell, UK., 368pp.