Journal of
Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 May 2018 | 10(6):
11806–11811
Durga DasÕs
Leaf-nosed Bat Hipposideros durgadasi Khajuria, 1970 (Mammalia: Chiroptera:
Hipposideridae): a new distribution record in
northern India hidden in the National Zoological Collections
M. Kamalakannan
1, Tauseef Hamid Dar 2 & C. Venkatraman
3
1,2,3 Zoological Survey of India, Prani Vigyan Bhawan, Block M, New Alipore, Kolkata, West Bengal 700053, India
1 kamalakannanm1@gmail.com (corresponding
author), 2 touseefzoology@gmail.com, 3 cvramanmbs@yahoo.com
doi: http://doi.org/10.11609/jott.4054.10.6.11806-11811 | ZooBank:
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:230F0F27-6457-4516-A77F-1CDA624D17D1
Editor: Paul Racey, University of Exeter, Devon,
UK. Date
of publication: 26 May 2018 (online & print)
Manuscript details: Ms
# 4054 | Received 05 February 2018 | Final received 01 May 2018 | Finally
accepted 05 May 2018
Citation: Kamalakannan, M., T.H. Dar &
C. Venkatraman (2018).
Durga DasÕs
Leaf-nosed Bat Hipposideros durgadasi Khajuria, 1970
(Mammalia: Chiroptera: Hipposideridae):
a new distribution record in northern India hidden in the National Zoological
Collections. Journal of Threatened Taxa 10(6): 11806–11811; http://doi.org/10.11609/jott.4054.10.6.11806-11811
Copyright: © Kamalakannan et al. 2018.
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. JoTT
allows unrestricted use of this article in any medium, reproduction and
distribution by providing adequate credit to the authors and the source of
publication.
Funding: Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate
Change, Govt. of India.
Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Acknowledgements: The authors are thankful to Dr. Kailash Chandra, Director,
Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata for constant support, providing necessary
facilities and encouragement and also acknowledge Dr.
Bhargavi Srinivasalu,
Osmania University, Hyderabad for helping in preparation of baculum.
Durga DasÕs
Leaf-nosed Bat Hipposideros durgadasi Khajuria, 1970 is one of
the 84 species of leaf-nosed bats (Family: Hipposideridae)
of the world (Murray et al. 2012).
In India, the genus Hipposideros is
represented by 13 species, of which, Hipposideros durgadasi and Hipposideros hypophyllus are endemic to peninsular India.
H. durgadasi (Image 1a) is a medium-sized bat (FA= 34.45–37.50),
belonging to bicolor-species group of the family Hipposideridae
and it roosts in small colonies of several (> 100) individuals (Khajuria 1980).
The roosts are found in the artificial caves in hillocks and under huge
granite boulders (Bates & Harrison 1997). In Karnataka, this species has been
observed to be sharing its roost with H. fulvus,
H. hypophyllus, H. speoris,
and Rhinopoma hardwickii
(Kaur et al. 2014), while in Madhya Pradesh, it
occurs in association with H. fulvus and
sometimes with Rhinolophus lepidus, Taphozous melanopogon, and T. theobaldi (Khajuria 1980).
The species forages in tropical dry deciduous and thorn forests. So far, this species has been recorded
only from two states, including its type locality in Katanga Village, Jabalpur
District, Madhya Pradesh in central India (Khajuria
1970) and Kolar District, Karnataka in southern India
(Kaur et al. 2014). It has been found at elevations from
347m to 900m.
While conducting surveys to document the mammalian fauna of Uttar
Pradesh in 1998, a team of the Zoological Survey of India (ZSI), headed by Mr.
J.P. Srivastava, collected nine individuals (5 males;
4 females) of bats from a roost site near Loyudhan
falls, 14km west of Mirzapur District in Uttar
Pradesh (25.12130N & 82.49220E; Fig.
1). The collection of specimens was
done on 25 August 1998 and later deposited in the National Zoological
Collections of Mammal & Osteology section, ZSI, Kolkata after registration
(# 26394- 26397; 26410-26414).
External measurements (both morphological and cranio-dental;
Table 1 & 2) were taken using digital Vernier
calliper (Mitutoyo) to
the nearest 0.01mm. The
photomicrographs of the baculum were captured
using an optical light microscope (LEICA M205 A; Image 1d). Photographs
of the skull of one of the specimens were taken from all aspects (Image
2a–f). Upon careful
examination of the external morphology and cranio-dental
characters of all specimens and bacular structure of
the male specimens (Khajuria 1970; Top‡l 1975; Khajuria
1980; Bates & Harrison 1997; Srinivasulu et
al. 2010; Kaur et al. 2014), they were identified
as Durga DasÕs
Leaf-nosed Bat Hipposideros durgadasi Khajuria,
1970.
Diagnostic characteristics: Fur is soft, brown to
reddish-brown on the dorsal surface (Image 1e), whitish on the ventral surface
(Image 1a). Supplementary leaflets
are absent. The anterior leaf has a
median emargination and is covered throughout with
short, stiff black hair. The internarial septum is well-developed,
with a short base and a bulbous apex (Image 1b). Nostrils are oval in shape and possess narial lappets on the outer margin. Compared to H.
cineraceus, forearm length is longer and
ears are shorter; the tail projects further beyond the interfemoral
membrane (> 1mm; Image 1c), unlike H. cineraecus,
where it is less than 1mm (Table 1 & 3). The cranio-dental
(Table 2) measurements such as condylobasal
length (CBL): 13.0–13.9 mm; condylo-canine length
(CCL): 12.65–12.78 also distinguish this species from
other leaf-nosed bats of bicolor-species group, namely, H. ater, H. fulvus, and H. cineraceus (Table 2 & 3). The baculum is small (1.3mm) with semi-circular (ÔCÕ)
shape. The base of baculum is rounded, wider, and the tip is pointed (Image
1d).
The morphological and cranio-dental
measurements of these voucher specimens were also compared with that of other
species of bicolor-species group (Table 3). The
presence of a well-developed internarial septum of
peculiar shape (with a short base and a bulbous apex), tail projecting beyond
the interfemoral membrane (>1mm), and
the conspicuous semi-circular shape (ÔCÕ shape) of the baculum
are some of the characters attributed to H. durgadasi
which render this species distinct from its sister species.
When this species was first reported from its type locality
(Katanga Village in Jabalpur District of Madhya Pradesh), it was considered as
a subspecies of Hipposideros cineraceus Blyth, 1853 (Khajuria,
1970). Later, Top‡l
(1975) distinguished this species as Hipposideros
durgadasi based on its distinct baculum structure.
Further, this species was also known to be present in the villages of Katangi, Richhai and Gwarighat in Jabalpur district of Madhya Pradesh (Top‡l 1975; Khajuria 1980) and
recently from Hanumanhalli and Therhalli
villages of Kolar District in Karnataka (Kaur et al. 2014; Fig 1). The specimens of H. durgadasi collected from Mirzapur
District in Uttar Pradesh were identified correctly as H. durgadasi (Image 1e) but were not reported or published
in any of the subsequent communications.
This might be due to lack of knowledge on taxonomy of bats at the time
of collection. Through this
communication, we report and confirm the presence of H. durgadasi
from Uttar Pradesh for the first time.
This also extends the distribution of this species further north in
peninsular India by 400km from the type locality.
The Durga DasÕs
Leaf-nosed Bat is a rare species in India and it has
been classified as ÔVulnerableÕ by the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species
(Mishra & Dookia 2016). Anthropogenic
activities like stone quarrying near roosting sites of the species is
causing habitat loss, which is the major threat to this species (Kaur et al. 2014).
Habitat protection and public awareness would help in mitigating further
threats to this species (Molur et al. 2002;
Mishra & Dookia 2016). Further studies on the taxonomy, ecology
and the range extension of the species throughout the country will help in
understating the present status of this species.
Table 1. Morphological measurements of Durga DasÕs Leaf-nosed Bat Hipposideros durgadasi
External measure-ments |
Morphological measurements
(mm) |
Present study |
Kaur et al. (2014) |
Bates & Harrison (1997) |
||||||||
Registration No. |
||||||||||||
26410 (male) |
26411 (male) |
26412 (female) |
26413 (female) |
26414 (male) |
26394 (female) |
26395 (female) |
26396 (female) |
26397 (male) |
||||
FA |
35.05 |
35.68 |
36.81 |
35.47 |
36.15 |
36.10 |
35.08 |
35.74 |
35.75 |
35.05–36.81 |
34.45–35.95 |
36.0–37.5 |
HB |
36.02 |
35.71 |
36.14 |
37.32 |
40.02 |
36.12 |
36.26 |
36.45 |
36.38 |
35.71–40.02 |
36.45–41.12 |
- |
T |
20.30 |
22.72 |
21.69 |
24.64 |
Damaged |
23.33 |
22.94 |
23.64 |
23.50 |
20.30–24.64 |
21.21–22.94 |
21.5–29.0 |
Tail tip length |
3.16 |
3.88 |
3.40 |
3.08 |
Damaged |
3.15 |
3.21 |
3.06 |
3.04 |
3.04–3.88 |
1.22–2.38 |
- |
HF |
5.66 |
5.49 |
5.78 |
5.47 |
5.62 |
5.40 |
5.87 |
5.42 |
5.35 |
5.35-5.87 |
5.1-6.7 |
5.5–8.0 |
Tib |
15.89 |
16.44 |
17.28 |
16.78 |
17.43 |
17.08 |
16.20 |
17.39 |
17.01 |
15.89–17.43 |
15.38–16.43 |
- |
E |
13.60 |
13.72 |
13.67 |
13.91 |
14.33 |
14.88 |
13.64 |
13.91 |
13.68 |
13.60–14.88 |
12.70–13.48 |
13.0–19.0 |
3mt |
24.55 |
26.40 |
28.33 |
26.68 |
27.02 |
27.20 |
27.16 |
27.32 |
27.37 |
24.55–28.33 |
26.12–28.0 |
- |
4mt |
26.70 |
28.67 |
30.03 |
29.52 |
28.58 |
29.01 |
29.31 |
28.68 |
29.31 |
26.70–30.03 |
27.62–29.61 |
- |
5mt |
24.57 |
26.78 |
27.15 |
26.70 |
26.42 |
26.57 |
26.43 |
26.91 |
26.91 |
24.57–27.15 |
25.75–27.71 |
- |
1st ph3rdD |
14.37 |
15.30 |
15.27 |
15.02 |
14.22 |
14.30 |
13.77 |
15.02 |
14.05 |
13.77–15.30 |
13.78–15.11 |
- |
2nd ph3rdD |
14.36 |
14.49 |
14.73 |
15.27 |
15.03 |
15.08 |
14.18 |
15.25 |
14.39 |
14.18–15.27 |
14.0–15.47 |
- |
1st ph4th D |
8.68 |
8.84 |
8.42 |
8.30 |
8.25 |
7.65 |
7.78 |
8.28 |
8.30 |
7.65–8.84 |
8.24–8.76 |
- |
2nd ph4thD |
8.26 |
8.47 |
8.32 |
8.19 |
8.10 |
7.06 |
6.63 |
8.10 |
8.03 |
6.63–8.47 |
7.63–8.26 |
- |
Hw |
3.69 |
3.75 |
3.75 |
3.69 |
3.86 |
3.25 |
3.30 |
3.72 |
3.57 |
3.25–3.86 |
- |
- |
Table 2. Cranio-dental
measurements (in mm) of Durga DasÕs
Leaf-nosed Bat Hipposideros durgadasi
|
Registration no. |
Present study |
Kaur et al. 2014 |
Bates & Harrison 1997 |
||
26411 (male) |
26413 (female) |
26414 (male) |
||||
GTL |
14.97 |
14.99 |
15.47 |
14.97–15.47 |
14.82–15.42 |
14.5–16.1 |
CBL |
13.35 |
12.95 |
13.45 |
12.95–13.45 |
12.8–13.25 |
13.0–13.90 |
CCL |
12.65 |
12.51 |
12.78 |
12.65–12.78 |
12.5–12.97 |
- |
ZB |
7.35 |
7.45 |
7.48 |
7.35–7.48 |
6.98–7.97 |
6.8–9.0 |
BB |
7.87 |
7.80 |
8.08 |
7.80–8.08 |
7.61–7.97 |
7.0–8.5 |
C1- C1 |
2.91 |
2.99 |
3.13 |
2.91–3.13 |
2.83–2.89 |
3.0–3.7 |
C- M3 |
4.71 |
4.64 |
4.48 |
4.48–4.71 |
4.67–4.78 |
5.0–6.0 |
M3- M3 |
4.89 |
4.96 |
4.95 |
4.89–4.96 |
4.75–5.07 |
- |
C- M3 |
4.88 |
4.89 |
4.99 |
4.88–4.99 |
4.57–5.1 |
5.0–6.0 |
M |
8.45 |
8.62 |
8.95 |
8.45–8.95 |
8.34–8.76 |
9.0–9.5 |
M3-M3 |
4.64 |
4.65 |
4.85 |
4.64–4.85 |
- |
5.0–5.8 |
Dental formula |
Incisor: 1/2; Canine:1/1; Premolar: 2/2; Molar: 3/3 = 30 |
Table 3. Morphological
and cranio-dental measurements of H. ater, H. fulvus, H. cineraceus and H. durgadasi
as per Bates & Harrison (1997).
External characters |
H. ater |
H. fulvus |
H. cineraceus |
H. durgadasi (present
study) |
FA |
34.9–38.0 |
38.4–44.0 |
33.0–36.3 |
35.05–36.81 |
HB |
38.0–48.0 |
40.0–50.0 |
33.0–42.0 |
35.71–4.02 |
T |
20.0–30.0 |
24.0–35.0 |
22.0–30.0 |
20.30–24.64 |
Tail tip length |
– |
– |
– |
3.04–3.88 |
HF |
5.3–7.2 |
6.0–9.8 |
6.0–7.0 |
5.35–5.87 |
Tib |
15.2–17.8 |
16.5–20.7 |
13.8–16.7 |
15.89–17.43 |
E |
14.8–20.0 |
19.0–26.0 |
13.0–17.0 |
13.60–14.88 |
3mt |
26.1–30.1 |
27.3–31.2 |
24.4–26.6 |
24.55–28.33 |
4mt |
27.2–32.2 |
28.3–33.9 |
26.9–28.8 |
26.70–30.03 |
5mt |
26.2–31.2 |
28.7–33.1 |
26.2–27.8 |
24.57–27.15 |
1st ph3rd D |
14.3–17.5 |
16.1–18.9 |
14.3–16.2 |
13.77–15.30 |
2nd ph3rdD |
14.3–17.4 |
16.2–19.5 |
12.5–15.3 |
14.18–15.27 |
1st ph4th D |
8.7–10.9 |
10.0–12.0 |
8.4–11.2 |
7.65–8.84 |
2nd ph4thD |
7.0–9.2 |
8.2–11.2 |
6.2–8.6 |
6.63–8.47 |
Cranio-dental characters |
||||
GTL |
15.4–16.7 |
17.2–18.6 |
15.2–16.2 |
14.97–15.47 |
CBL |
– |
– |
– |
12.95–13.45 |
CCL |
13.2–14.2 |
15.0–16.4 |
12.7–13.7 |
12.65–12.78 |
ZB |
7.7–8.3 |
8.6–9.6 |
6.9–7.6 |
7.35–7.48 |
BB |
7.5–8.5 |
7.5–9.4 |
7.2–8.2 |
7.80–8.08 |
C1–C1 |
3.3–3.8 |
3.6–4.4 |
2.7–3.1 |
2.91–3.13 |
C–M3 |
5.1–5.7 |
6.0–6.9 |
4.9–5.3 |
4.48–4.71 |
M3– M3 |
5.1–5.8 |
5.8–6.8 |
4.6–5.1 |
4.89–4.96 |
C–M3 |
5.2–6.1 |
6.4–7.5 |
5.2–5.8 |
4.88–4.99 |
M |
9.4–10.2 |
11.1–12.0 |
8.8–9.4 |
8.45–8.95 |
References
Bates, P.J.J. & D.L. Harrison (1997). Bats of the Indian
Subcontinent. Harrison Zoological Museum,
Sevenoaks, England, UK, 258pp.
Kaur, H., S. Chelmala, B. Srinivasulu, T.
Shah, G. Devender & A. Srinivasulu
(2014).
Taxonomic notes and distribution extension of Durga DasÕs leaf-nosed bat Hipposideros
durgadasi Khajuria,
1970 Chiroptera: Hipposideridae
from south India. Biodiversity Data Journal 2: e4127; http://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e4127
Khajuria, H. (1970). A new leaf-nosed bat
from central India. Mammalia 34: 622–627.
Khajuria, H. (1980). Taxonomical and ecological studies on
bats of Jabalpur district, Madhya Pradesh, India. Part II. Families Megadermatidae, Rhinolophidae and
Vespertilionidae. Records of the
Zoological Survey of India, Miscellaneous Publications, Occasional Paper 19:
1–69.
Mishra, R. & S. Dookia
(2016). Hipposideros durgadasi.
The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T10131A22090631. Downloaded
on 01 February 2018. http://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-2.RLTS.T10131A22090631.en
Molur, S., G. Marimuthu,
C. Srinivasulu, S. Mistry,
A.M. Hutson, P.J.J. Bates, S. Walker, K. Padmapriya & A.R. Binupriya
(2002). Status of
South Asian Chiroptera: Conservation Assessment and
Management Plan C.A.M.P. Workshop Report. Zoo Outreach
Organization/CBSG-South Asia, Coimbatore, India.
Murray, S.W., P. Campbellb,
T. Kingston, A. Zubaidd, C. M. Francise
& T.H. Kunz (2012). Molecular phylogeny of hipposiderid bats from
Southeast Asia and evidence of cryptic diversity. Molecular
Phylogenetics and Evolution 62: 597–611.
Srinivasulu, C., P.A. Racey
& S. Mistry (2010). A key to the bats Mammalia: Chiroptera of South Asia. Journal of Threatened Taxa
27: 1001–1076; http://doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.o2352.1001-76
Top‡l, G. (1975). Bacula of some
old world leaf-nosed bats Rhinolophidae and Hipposideridae, Chiroptera:
Mammalia. Vertebrata Hungarica 16: 21‑53.