Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 September 2018 | 10(10): 12328–12336

Species composition and abundance estimates of reptiles in selected agroecosystems in southern Western Ghats, India

Abhirami Mini Jayakumar ¹ & Paingamadathil Ommer Nameer ²

^1,2 Centre for Wildlife Studies, College of Forestry, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur, Kerala 680656, India

¹ abhirami.mj@gmail.com, ² nameer.po@kau.in (corresponding author)

doi: https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.3652.10.10.12328-12336 | ZooBank: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:860DCCC7-66AB-4A46-A362-5EC56D844488

Editor: Pritpal S. Soorae, Environment Agency Abu Dhabii, United Arab Emirates. Date of publication: 26 September 2018 (online & print)

Manuscript details: Ms # 3652 | Received 14 July 2017 | Final received 02 August 2018 | Finally accepted 12 September 2018

Citation: Jayakumar, A.M. & P.O. Nameer (2018). Species composition and abundance estimates of reptiles in selected agroecosystems in southern Western Ghats, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 10(10): 12328–12336; https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.3652.10.10.12328-12336

Copyright: © Jayakumar & Nameer 2018. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. JoTT allows unrestricted use of this article in any medium, reproduction and distribution by providing adequate credit to the authors and the source of publication.

Funding: Kerala Agricultural University.

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Author Details: Abhirami M. Jayakumar is a PG research scholar, whose interest include taxonomy and ecology of reptiles of Western Ghats. P.O. Nameer is a Professor and his research interest include the taxonomy, biogeography and ecology of the vertebrates except fishes.

Author Contribution: Both the authors contributed equally to the design of the study, field work, morphometric data collection, analysis and manuscript preparation.

Acknowledgements: We thank Neelesh Dahanukar, IISER, Pune for his assistance with data analysis. Abhin M. Sunil, Bharath M. R., Habeel Sahal, Nibin Antony K., Francis Scaria, Al Ameen A., Sreekumar E. R., Prajeesh P., Syamili M. S., Dilgith Surendran and Amal U. S. assisted us with the field work. The Dean, College of Forestry, Kerala Agricultural University is acknowledged for the encouragement and support. We also thank the anonymous reviewers and the Subject Editor for their critical comments.

Abstract: Species composition and abundance of reptiles in selected agroecosystems in Thrissur plains, near Palghat Gap, southern Western Ghats in India, was studied from January 2017 to May 2017. The agroecosystems surveyed were coconut, cashew & rubber plantations, home garden, paddy field, and botanical garden. Time-constrained visual encounter surveys of a total effort of 360 man-hours were done in the field. Coconut and cashew plantations reported the highest species richness with 11 species each, while the highest number of sightings (159) were recorded from botanical garden. Bronze Grass Skink Eutropis macularia was the most abundant species in agroecosystems. Correspondence analysis was done to compare the reptilian diversity in the agroecosystems. The reptile fauna of home garden and paddy field were found to be more distinct than the rest of the agroecosystems. A total of 17 species of reptiles were recorded during the study, thus highlighting the significance of agroecosystems in acting as important buffer landscapes for reptiles.

Keywords: Cashew plantation, coconut plantation, botanical garden, home garden, Important Bird Area, Kole wetlands, paddy field, Ramsar site, rubber plantation.

INTRODUCTION

Nearly two-thirds of the terrestrial environment of the world is made up of managed ecosystems with natural, undisturbed habitats accounting for only a meagre five percentage. These managed ecosystems include agricultural systems, forestry systems, and human settlements (Gamage et al. 2008). Herpetofauna makes up 48% of the terrestrial vertebrates that are threatened by agroforestry and forestry activities (Palacios et al. 2013).

Despite the fact that herpetofauna makes up half of vertebrate species, they are very much understudied in their response to change in habitats from natural forests to plantations. The review done by Palacios et al. (2013) on the herpetofauna of agroecosystems on a global scale found just 27 studies pertaining to amphibians and reptiles. Very few studies on the reptilian diversity of agroecosystems have been done in southern India too. Perhaps the only study on the reptiles of human-modified habitats is the one by Venugopal (2010), who studied the agamids of human-modified habitats in the Western Ghats.

In a time when more and more forest areas are being converted into plantations and agricultural lands for meeting the growing needs of human populations, it is important to evaluate the reptile diversity in these modified ecosystems. It is important to assess whether these agroecosystems are capable of supporting and sustaining reptile biodiversity, particularly that of habitat specialists and endemic species.

STUDY AREA

The study was conducted in selected agroecosystems in Thrissur District, southern Western Ghats, Kerala (10.53–10.55⁰N & 76.27–76.28⁰E, 20–70 m). The agroecosystems chosen included cashew, coconut & rubber plantations, home garden, paddy field, and botanical garden (Fig. 1). The study area chosen mostly comes within the main campus of Kerala Agricultural University in Kerala. The campus has a total area of 391.44ha and is located very close to Peechi-Vazhani Wildlife Sanctuary. The major habitats include gardens, botanical gardens, plantations of rubber, coconut, plantain & cocoa, and orchards of mango, jackfruit, sapota & guava. The whole area must have been under forests about one and a half centuries ago and was subsequently converted mostly into rubber plantations. Later, in 1971, the land was handed over to the Kerala Agricultural University (KAU), and the KAU developed these areas into different land uses as explained above. The 14-year mean minimum temperature is 23.3⁰C and the 10-year mean maximum is 31.9⁰C. The area receives southwest and northeast monsoons, the greater portion of the rainfall, however, is received from the southwest monsoon between June and September. The mean annual rainfall is 2803.4mm. The mean number of rainy days per year is 112 (Manohar et al. 2017). The paddy field selected was located at the Kole Wetlands in central Kerala, which incidentally is a Ramsar site and an Important Bird Area (IBA) (Islam & Rahmani 2004, 2008).

METHODS

The method followed was time-constrained visual encounter survey of a two-hour duration in each of the agroecosystems in the morning (08:00–10:00 hr) and evening (19:00–21:00 hr). Each location was covered on foot and whenever a species was sighted, observations such as the name of the species, the number of sightings, time, and GPS location were recorded following Ishwar et al. (2001). At each agroecosystem, the survey was carried out for five days. Thus, the total effort spent during the entire course of the study was 360 man -hours. Additionally, micro-habitat parameters such as canopy height, canopy cover, leaf litter depth, leaf litter cover, shrub cover, herb cover, and number of fallen logs were recorded at each of the agroecosystems. Litter depth was measured using a steel scale (Elora) and canopy height was measured using Haga altimeter (Durga Enterprises). The rest of the measurements were visually estimated (see Vasudevan et al. 2001; Kanagavel et al. 2013). Weather data like maximum temperature, minimum temperature, and relative humidity for the study period was obtained from the Kerala Agricultural University Weather Station located in Thrissur District, Kerala. The study was carried out from January to May 2017 in the pre-monsoon season.

For confirming the identification of the species, the following literature were consulted: Das (2002), Whitaker & Captain (2004), Mahony (2011), Agarwal & Karanth (2015), Agarwal et al. (2016), Lajmi et al. (2016). The distribution range of the species was verified using Ganesh et al. (2013) and Palot (2016).

Statistical Analysis

Chi-square analysis of association was performed to understand whether the reptile fauna had a preference for any plantation types (coconut, cashew, rubber, home gardens, botanical gardens, or paddy fields). Patterns of relationship between species abundance across nine environmental parameters (canopy cover, canopy height, litter depth, litter cover, shrub cover, herb cover, maximum temperature, minimum temperature, and relative humidity) in different plantation types were investigated using canonical correspondence analysis (CCA), a multivariate constrained ordination technique (Legendre & Legendre 1998). A triplot of observations grouped for plantation types, species, and eigenvectors of environmental variables was plotted to understand the species distribution along the plantation types and environmental variables. A scree plot of eigenvalues and cumulative inertia explained by each canonical axes was plotted to understand the contribution of each axes. The significance of the canonical axes was tested using permutations test (Legendre et al. 2011). Statistical analysis was performed in PAST 3.19 (Hammer et al. 2001).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A total of 594 sightings of 17 species (Table 1) was encountered from the agroecosystems during the study period, with an average pooled encounter rate of 1.27 reptiles/man-hour. The species richness was the highest in coconut and cashew plantations, with 11 species each (Table 2; Images 1–14). The abundance of the reptiles, however, was greatest in botanical gardens (159 sightings). Bronze Grass Skink Eutropis macularia was the most encountered species in the agroecosystems of Thrissur District with 220 sightings, followed by (Murray’s) House Gecko Hemidactylus cf. murrayi totalling 87 sightings.

The variation in the number of sightings of the reptiles between day and night are given in Fig. 2. As expected, it can be seen that most of the reptiles were more active during night hours. Out of the six species of geckos seen during the study, all four species of Hemidactylus geckos, as well as Cyrtodactylus cf. collegalensis, were nocturnal in habit. The Day Geckos Cnemaspis spp., however, as its common name suggests, were observed mainly during morning hours. Among skinks, Ristella cf. beddomii was primarily a nocturnal species, while Sphenomorphus dussumieri was spotted only during day hours. Eutropis macularia, E. carinata, and the agamid lizard Calotes versicolor were observed during both morning and night hours. Calotes versicolor was observed to be sleeping when spotted during night hours. All the seven species of snakes observed were spotted during night hours (Fig. 2).

There was a significant association between plantation types and abundance of different reptile species (chi square = 1006.3, df = 80, P < 0.0001), indicating that the reptile fauna had a differential preference for the plantation type. The complex pattern of reptile species distribution across the plantation types and environmental variables are depicted in the CCA triplot (Fig. 3). The first two CCA axes were significant (permutations 999, trace = 1.047, P = 0.001; canonical axis 1, eigen value = 0.4199, P = 0.001; canonical axis 2, eigenvalue = 0.2819, P = 0.001) and together they explained 67% total inertia in the data. Both species composition and environmental parameters of the different plantation types were different with no overlap for paddy fields, indicating that paddy fields are not only distinctly different in the environmental parameters but has a different reptile fauna. Xenochrophis piscator was unique to the paddy field habitat while Lycodon aulicus was more abundant in the paddy field as compared to other habitats and both these factors could be correlated to the relatively higher humidity and temperature of paddy field habitats and lower canopy cover, canopy height, litter depth, litter cover, shrub cover, and herb cover (Fig. 3). In general, species such as Boiga beddomei, Bungarus caeruleus, Calotes versicolor, Coelognathus helena, Hemidactylus frenatus, H. cf. murrayi, H. triedrus, Sphenomorphus dussumieri, Lycodon aulicus, and Xenochrophis piscator preferred relatively higher humidity and temperature and lower canopy cover, canopy height, litter depth, litter cover, shrub cover, and herb cover. As a result, these species mainly favoured home gardens and paddy fields in Kole Wetlands, followed by cashew and coconut plantations and, rarely, rubber plantations or botanical gardens. On the other hand, Ahaetulla cf. nasuta, Cnemaspis sp., Cryodactylus collegalensis, Eutropis macularia, Eutropis carinata, Oligodon taeniolatus, and Ristella cf. beddomii preferred higher canopy cover, canopy height, litter depth, litter cover, shrub cover, and herb cover and favoured rubber plantations and botanical gardens, followed by cashew and coconut plantations (Fig. 3).

While this is a preliminary, pooled analysis consisting of resource use frequencies of both active and dormant sightings, it gives at least a preliminary picture of probable impacts on resultant species records. We mention this with a caution that more studies with better sample size and discerning active and dormant sightings are needed to fully understand the impacts of these abiotic variables on species composition and assemblage structure. We believe that our work will pave the way for future studies to take a deeper look into this subject (also see Vijayakumar et al. 2006).

Palacios et al. (2013), who reviewed studies on the herpetofauna in human-modified habitats across the world, found that in 81% of the cases plantations supported more herpetofauna than natural forests. They also found that human-modified habitats support even some endemic species in agroecosystems. Two species of reptiles endemic to the Western Ghats, Ristella cf. beddomii and Sphenomorphus dussumieri, were recorded from the agroecosystems of central Kerala. The present sighting of the Ristella cf. beddomii from the agroecosystem at an elevation of 50m is lower than the known altitude range of 400–1300 m (Srinivasulu et al. 2014) of this species.

Apart from addressing reptile conservation in managed landscapes, our study also fills in a major gap in herpetological studies in southern India – their community assemblage structure. Very few studies have elaborated on this topic. Studies from Western Ghats rainforests (Inger et al. 1987), the Western Ghats dry forests (Vijayakumar et al. 2006), Eastern Ghats wet forests (Ganesh & Arumugam 2015; & Ramesh & Arumugam 2016), and the Coromandel coastal plains scrub forests (Ramesh et al. 2013) are available. The current paper provides a first-hand data on reptile assemblage structure from a central Kerala plains site, that too from the little-studied Palghat Gap region.

This documentation is important as it highlights the significance of agroecosystems in conserving and maintaining the reptilian fauna of the region, including some of the Western Ghats endemic species.

Table 1. Reptiles of selected agroecosystems in Thrissur District

	Common name	Scientific name	Family	IUCN status	Image
1	(Murray’s) House Gecko	Hemidactylus cf. murrayi	Gekkonidae	NE	Image 1
2	Common House Gecko	Hemidactylus frenatus	Gekkonidae	LC	Images 2 & 3
3	Termite Hill Gecko	Hemidactylus triedrus	Gekkonidae	NE	Image 4
4	Day Gecko	Cnemaspis cf. gracilis	Gekkonidae		Images 5 & 6
5	Kollegal Ground Gecko	Cyrtodactylus collegalensis	Gekkonidae	NE	Image 7
6	Dussumier’s Litter Skink*	Sphenomorphus dussumieri	Scincidae	LC	Image 8
7	Bronze Grass Skink	Eutropis macularia	Scincidae	NE	Image 9
8	Common Keeled Skink	Eutropis carinata	Scincidae	LC	Image 10
9	(Beddome’s) Cat Skink*	Ristella cf. beddomii	Scincidae	LC	Image 11
10	Oriental Garden Lizard	Calotes versicolor	Agamidae	NE	Image 12
11	Common Indian Krait	Bungarus caeruleus	Elapidae	NE
12	Beddome’s Cat Snake	Boiga beddomei	Colubridae	LC
13	Common Wolf Snake	Lycodon aulicus	Colubridae	NE
14	Common Trinket Snake	Coelognathus helena	Colubridae	NE
15	(Common) Vine Snake	Ahaetulla cf. nasuta	Colubridae	NE	Image 14
16	Russell’s Kukri Snake	Oligodon taeniolatus	Colubridae	LC	Image 13
17	Checkered Keelback	Xenochrophis piscator	Natricidae	NE

Table 2. Species diversity and abundance of reptiles in selected agroecosystems in Thrissur District

	Species	Coconut Plantation	Cashew Plantation	Rubber Plantation	Home garden	Botanical Garden	Paddy field	Total
		Number of sightings
1	Hemidactylus cf. murrayi	47	20	3	2	10	0	82
2	Hemidactylus frenatus	40	6	16	4	3	0	69
4	Hemidactylus triedrus	0	2	0	0	0	0	2
5	Cnemaspis spp.	10	1	8	3	19	0	41
6	Cryodactylus collegalensis	7	6	18	2	11	0	44
7	Sphenomorphus dussumieri	0	0	0	13	0	0	13
8	Eutropis macularia	21	45	82	2	70	0	220
9	Eutropis carinata	1	9	0	0	14	0	24
10	Ristella cf. beddomii	0	11	5	0	28	0	44
11	Calotes versicolor	16	11	9	3	3	0	42
12	Bungarus caeruleus	0	0	0	1	0	0	1
13	Boiga beddomei	1	0	1	0	0	0	2
14	Lycodon aulicus	1	1	0	0	0	2	4
15	Coelognathus helena	1	0	0	0	0	0	1
16	Ahaetulla cf. nasuta	0	0	1	0	0	0	1
17	Oligodon taeniolatus	0	0	0	0	0	3	1
18	Xenochrophis piscator	0	0	0	0	1	0	3
	Total	145	112	143	30	159	5	594

REFERENCES

Aengals, R., V.M.S. Kumar & M.J. Palot (2011). Updated Checklist of Indian Reptiles. Southern Regional Centre, Zoological Survey of India, Chennai. Accessed on 10 November 2015; http://zsi.gov.in/checklist/Checklist%20of%20 Indian%20Reptiles.pdf.

Agarwal, I. & K.P. Karanth (2015). A phylogeny of the only ground-dwelling radiation of Cyrtodactylus (Squamata, Gekkonidae): diversification of Geckoella across peninsular India and Sri Lanka. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 82: 193–199; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2014.09.016

Agarwal, I., Z.A. Mirza, S. Pal, S.T. Maddock, A. Mishra & A.M. Bauer (2016). A new species of the Cyrtodactylus (Geckoella) collegalensis (Beddome, 1870) complex (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from western India. Zootaxa 4170(2): 339–354; https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4170.2.7

Bhupathy, S. & N. Sathishkumar (2013). CEPF Western Ghats special series: status of reptiles in Meghamalai and its environs, Western Ghats, Tamil Nadu, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 5(15): 4953–4961; https://doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.o3595.4953-61

Das, I. (2002). A Photographic Guide to the Snakes and Other Reptiles of India. New Holland Publishers (U.K.) Ltd., London, 144pp

Gamage, S.N., A. Gunawardena, D.K. Weerakoon & W.K. Liyanage (2008). A comparative study of the leaf litter herpetofauna and physical parameters in different agro-eco systems (tea, rubber and oil palm) and natural rain forest in the south-western wet-zone of Sri Lanka. Journal of Environmental Research and Development 2(3): 285–294.

Ganesh, S.R. & M. Arumugam (2015). Microhabitat use and abundance estimates of under storey herpetofauna in the highlands of southern Eastern Ghats, India, with observations on roadkill mortalities. Asian Journal of Conservation Biology 4(2): 143–150.

Ganesh, S.R. & M. Arumugam (2016). Species richness of montane herpetofauna of southern Eastern Ghats, India: a historical resume and a descriptive checklist. Russian Journal of Herpetology 23(1): 7–24.

Ganesh, S.R., S.R. Chandramouli, R. Sreekar & P.G. Shankar (2013). Reptiles of the central Western Ghats, India - a reappraisal and revised checklist, with emphasis on the Agumbe Plateau. Russian Journal of Herpetology 20(3): 181–189.

Gardner, T. A., J. Barlow & C.A. Peres (2007). Paradox, presumption and pitfalls in conservation biology: the importance of habitat change for amphibians and reptiles. Biological Conservation 138(1): 166–179; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.04.017

Gibbons, J.W., D.E. Scott, T.J. Ryan, K.A. Buhlmann, T.D. Tuberville, B.S. Metts, J.L. Greene, T. Mills, Y. Leiden, S. Poppy & C.T. Winne (2000). The global decline of reptiles, deja vu amphibians. BioScience 50(8): 653–666.

Hammer, Ø., D.A.T. Harper & P.D. Ryan (2001). PAST-PAlaeontological STatistics, version 1.89. Palaeontologia electronica 4(1): 1–9.

Inger, R.F., H.B. Shaffer, M. Koshy & R. Bakde (1987). Ecological structure of a herpetological assemblage in south India. Amphibia-Reptilia 8(3): 189–202.

Ishwar, N.M., R. Chellam & A. Kumar (2001). Distribution of forest floor reptiles in the rainforest of Kalakad-Mundathurai Tiger Reserve, south India. Current Science 80(3): 413–418.

Islam, M.Z. & A.R. Rahmani (2004). Important Bird Areas in India. Priority Sites for Conservation. Indian Bird Conservation Network: Bombay Natural History Society, BirdLife International, xviii+1133pp.

Islam, M.Z. & A.R. Rahmani (2008). Potential and Existing Ramsar Sites in India. Indian Bird Conservation Network: Bombay Natural History Society, BirdLife International and Royal Society for the Protection of Birds. Oxford University Press, 592pp.

Kanagavel, A., S.M. Rehel & R. Raghavan (2013). Population, ecology, and threats to two endemic and threatened terrestrial chelonians of the Western Ghats, India. ISRN Biodiversity 2013: 1–8.

Lajmi, A., V.B. Giri & K.P. Karanth (2016). Molecular data in conjunction with morphology help resolve the Hemidactylus brookii complex (Squamata: Gekkonidae). Organisms Diversity & Evolution 16(3): 659–677.

Legendre, P. & L. Legendre (1998). Numerical Ecology, 2^nd English edition. Elsevier, 853pp.

Legendre, P., J. Oksanen & C.J. ter Braak (2011). Testing the significance of canonical axes in redundancy analysis. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 2(3): 269–277.

Mahony, S. (2011). Taxonomic revision of Hemidactylus brookii Gray: a re-examination of the type series and some Asian synonyms, and a discussion of the obscure species Hemidactylus subtriedrus Jerdon (Reptilia: Gekkonidae). Zootaxa 3042(1): 37–67.

Manohar, K.A., A. Ramachandran, M.S. Syamili, E.R. Sreekumar, N. Mohan, J. Anjali, A. Reddy & P.O. Nameer (2017). Birds of the Kerala Agricultural University campus, Thrissur District, Kerala, India - an update. Journal of Threatened Taxa 9(8): 10585–10612; https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.2455.9.8.10585-10612

Palacios, C.P., B. Aguero & J.A. Simonetti (2013). Agroforestry systems as habitat for herpetofauna: is there supporting evidence? Agroforestry Systems 87(3): 517–523.

Palot, M.J. (2015). A checklist of reptiles of Kerala, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 7(13): 8010–8022; https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.1999.7.13.7961-7970

Ramesh, T., K.J. Hussain, K.K. Satpathy & M. Selvanayagam (2013). Community composition and distribution of herpetofauna at Kalpakkam Nuclear cCampus, southern India. Herpetology Notes 6: 343–351.

Srinivasulu, C., B. Srinivasulu & S. Molur (Compilers) (2014). The Status and Distribution of Reptiles in the Western Ghats, India. Conservation Assessment and Management Plan (CAMP). Wildlife Information Liaison Development Society, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 150pp.

Vasudevan K., A. Kumar & R. Chellam (2001). Structure and composition of rainforest floor amphibian communities in Kalakad-Mundathurai Tiger Reserve. Current Science 80(3): 406–412.

Venugopal, P.D. (2010). Population density estimates of agamid lizards in human-modified habitats of the Western Ghats. The Herpetological Journal 20(2): 69–76.

Vijayakumar, S.P., A. Ragavendran & B.C. Choudhury (2006). Herpetofaunal assemblage in a tropical dry forest mosaic of Western Ghats, India: Preliminary analysis of species composition and abundance during the dry season. Hamadryad 30(1/2): 40–53.

Whitaker, R. & A. Captain (2004). Snakes of India. The Field Guide. Draco Books. Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, xiv+479pp.