Short Communication

Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 January 2017 | 9(1): 9734–9737

275477.jpg

 

 

Incipient loss of a rainforest mutualism?

 

Johannes H. Fischer 1, Heiko U. Wittmer 2, Endro Setiawan 3, Sarah Jaffe 4 & Andrew J. Marshall 5

 

1,2 School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington 6140, New Zealand

3 Gunung Palung National Park Bureau, Jalan Wahid Hasyim 41A, Ketapang, West Kalimantan, Indonesia

4,5 Department of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1107, USA

5 Program in the Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2215, USA

5 School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1041, USA

1 johannesfischer@live.nl (corresponding author), 2 heiko.wittmer@vuw.ac.nz, 3 endronesia@gmail.com, 4 sarahmjaffe@gmail.com, 5 ajmarsha@umich.edu

 

 

doi: http://doi.org/10.11609/jott.2890.9.1.9734-9737

 

Editor: Mewa Singh, University of Mysore, Mysuru, India. Date of publication: 26 January 2017 (online & print)

 

Manuscript details: Ms # 2890 | Received 07 July 2016 | Final received 06 December 2016 | Finally accepted 03 January 2017

 

Citation: Fischer, J.H., H.U. Wittmer, E. Setiawan, S. Jaffe & A.J. Marshall (2017). Incipient loss of a rainforest mutualism? Journal of Threatened Taxa 9(1): 9734–9737; http://doi.org/10.11609/jott.2890.9.1.9734-9737

 

Copyright: © Fischer et al. 2017. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. JoTT allows unrestricted use of this article in any medium, reproduction and distribution by providing adequate credit to the authors and the source of publication.

 

Funding: University of Michigan and Victoria University of Wellington.

 

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

 

Acknowledgements: Permission to conduct research at Gunung Palung National Park was kindly granted by the State Ministry of Research and Technology and Higher Education (KEMENRISTEKDIKTI), the Directorate of Natural Resources and Ecosystems (KSDAE), and the Gunung Palung National Park Bureau (BTNGP). We are grateful to Universitas Tanjungpura for support, the University of Michigan and Victoria University of Wellington for funding, our field assistants for maintaining the cameras, and Wahyu Susanto for assistance with the Indonesian translation of the abstract. We thank two anonymous reviewers for improving the manuscript.

 

 

 

Abstract: We use data from motion-activated remote cameras to document a commensal, and possibly mutualistic, relationship between Bornean Ground Cuckoos and Bearded Pigs in the rainforests of Kalimantan, Indonesia. We hypothesise that birds benefiting from symbiotic relationships may suffer indirect detrimental effects from hunting that targets large mammals in tropical rainforests.

Keywords: Bird-mammal relationships, Borneo, Carpococcyx radiaceus, defaunation, indirect effects, Sus barbatus, tropical rainforest.

 

 

 

Birds exhibit important symbiotic relationships with species in other taxonomic groups. For example, the crucial seed dispersal and pollination services they provide to many plant species are well documented (Herrera et al. 1994; Waser et al. 1996). Commensalism and mutualism between birds and mammals, however, remain less well understood. Perhaps the most commonly described ecological interactions between birds and mammals are co-feeding associations in which birds benefit from elevated encounter rates with prey disturbed by foraging mammals (Ruggiero & Eves 1998). Such relationships are generally commensal and often opportunistic (Dean & Macdonald 1981). Sometimes, however, mammals also benefit from interactions with birds. A well-known example is “cleaner birds”, where mammals profit from the removal of ectoparasites, dead tissue and organic debris (Sazima & Sazima 2010), although this is not the only instance of an avian-mammalian relationship in which both parties benefit. In other observed occurrences, some birds that co-feed with mammals in turn help mammals detect potential predators, resulting in a mutualistic relationship (Rasa 1983).

Most research on bird-mammal relationships originates from more open habitats such as savannah, alluvial or pelagic ecosystems (Dean & Macdonald 1981; Evans 1982; Rasa 1983; Ruggiero & Eves 1998; Komar & Hanks 2002; D’Angelo & Sazima 2014). Anecdotal evidence, however, indicates relationships, of at least a commensal nature, between birds and mammals to be present in tropical rainforests (e.g., Laman et al. 1997; Ruggiero & Eves 1998; Long & Collar 2002; Sazima & Sazima 2010). The limited documentation of these relationships in tropical forests is most likely attributable to the difficulty of detecting and studying cryptic and often rare rainforest species in general, and interspecific interactions in particular.

The Bornean Ground Cuckoo Carpococcyx radiceus (BGC hereafter) is a poorly studied rainforest bird species for which reports of commensal relationships with mammals exist (Long & Collar 2002). The BGC is one of the three large, terrestrial cuckoos in the Southeast Asian genus Carpococcyx, and endemic to the lowland and hill forests of Borneo. Several reports describe co-feeding behaviour between BGCs and both Bornean Bearded Pigs Sus barbatus and Sun Bears Helarctos malayanus (Laman et al. 1997; Long & Collar 2002), suggesting that BGCs maintain a commensal relationship with these large mammals. Evidence for this behaviour, however, is based on single observations, most likely because any observation of the elusive BGC is highly unusual, let alone an observation of the species in proximity with another taxon.

 

 

312563.jpg

 

 

We are currently using motion-activated remote cameras to study vertebrate ecology at the Cabang Panti Research Station, Gunung Palung National Park, West Kalimantan, Indonesia (Marshall et al. 2014; Allen et al. 2016). Between July and October 2015, we recorded BGCs on eight occasions at five of 28 cameras spread across the gradient of tropical forest types found at Cabang Panti. We recorded BGS videos in peat swamp (n = 3 videos), freshwater swamp (n = 2) and lowland sandstone (n = 3) forests. On three of these occasions, at three different localities, we recorded symbiotic behaviour between a BGC and Bearded Pigs. Two videos show BGCs in close proximity to pigs that are feeding on the forest floor. In these recordings, the BGC appears to consume prey items (presumably invertebrates) that are disturbed by the feeding pigs (Image 1A, Video 1, Video 2). On the third video, a Bearded Pig is feeding and a BGC jumps on top of it and appears to scan its surroundings like a sentry (Image 1B, Video 3). The Bearded Pig did not perceptibly respond to this behaviour, suggesting this may be a fairly regular occurrence.

Our data suggest that these relationships play an important role in the behaviour of BGCs as three out of eight videos (38 percent) containing BGCs show interactions with Bearded Pigs. These videos comprise a small proportion of the many hundreds of videos on which we have recorded of Bearded Pigs, which are found in all forest types at our research site (Marshall et al. 2014). The habitats in which BGCs were recorded are consistent with previous reports (Laman et al. 1997; Long & Collar 2002; Fredriksson & Nijman 2004). The behaviour in Image 1B is consistent with the hypothesis that BGCs use pigs as elevated perches from which to hunt (a commensal relationship described by Tomazzoni et al. (2005) for several smaller passerines that use Capybaras, Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris, as perches). This hypothesis does not seem very plausible in the case of BGCs. The BGC is a large terrestrial species and therefore unlikely to be dependent on perches to detect prey. We propose an alternative hypothesis: these videos show both sides of a mutualism between BGCs and Bearded Pigs and illustrate that the relationship is more than opportunistic commensalism. We furthermore propose two ways in which this relationship could be mutualistic: (1) Bearded Pigs may benefit from being alerted to potential predators by BGCs, or 2) BGCs might act as “cleaner birds”. Future investigations are required to assess the validity of these hypotheses. In addition, further work is required to determine whether the other two Southeast Asian, Carpococcyx species, Sumatran Ground Cuckoo (C. viridis) and Coral-billed Ground Cuckoo (C. renauldi), have similar relationships with large mammals.

The BGC is not the only large terrestrial cuckoo in tropical rainforests for which commensal behaviour with large mammals has been reported. The large, terrestrial Neomorphus cuckoos, for example, have been reported to associate with Collared Pecaries Pecari tayacu and/or White-lipped Peccaries Tayassu pecari (López-Lánus et al. 1999). Although reports of interactions among these species remain limited and anecdotal, it is reasonable to expect that further research may show that relationships currently thought to be commensal may be similar to the BGC-Bearded Pig relationship demonstrated here.

Although the precise nature and frequency of interactions between terrestrial birds and large mammals in the tropics is not well characterized at present, symbioses between these groups are common in tropical rainforests around the globe. These relationships rely on the presence of large mammals, which have long been a focus of (subsistence) hunting (Peres 2000). Bornean Bearded Pigs are subject to increasingly heavy hunting pressure throughout their range and are currently considered Vulnerable by the IUCN (2015). Declines in pig abundance will likely limit opportunities for BGCs to interact with them in the future. Indeed, Long & Collar (2002) suggested that the symbiotic relationship between BGCs and Bearded Pigs was more common in the past. It is also intriguing to speculate that symbioses once occurred between BGCs and even larger mammals that are now found at extremely low densities and in limited subsets of their former ranges, such as the Endangered Banteng Bos javanicus and the Critically Endangered Sumatran Rhinoceros Dicerorhinus sumatrensis (IUCN 2015).

The most commonly attributed cause for the decline of rainforest species is the reduction of forest cover, but as Redford (1992: 421) pointed out, “we must not let a forest full of trees fool us into believing that all is well”. Subsistence hunting, which generally has the greatest impact on species with the largest biomass (Peres 2000; Wright et al. 2007), is known to alter symbiotic relationships such as seed dispersal and pollination (Redford 1992; Beckman & Muller-Landau 2007; Beaune et al. 2013). We consider it likely that the indirect effects of forest defaunation reach even further, as mammal population declines and changes in species abundances may result in disappearance of interspecific interactions whose ecological importance is poorly understood. The BGC is an unpalatable and smelly species (Long & Collar 2002) and therefore likely to mostly suffer from hunting through accidental by-catch (e.g., in snares). This does not, however, mean that BGCs are not negatively affected by hunting. It may well be that birds exhibiting mutualisms with large mammals are suffering from adverse, indirect effects of the selective defaunation of rainforest ecosystems.

References

Allen, M.L., H.U. Wittmer, E. Setiawan, S. Jaffe & A.J. Marshall (2016). Scent marking in Sunda Clouded Leopards (Neofelis diardi): novel observations close a key gap in understanding felid communication behaviours. Scientific Reports 6: 35433; http://doi.org/10.1038/srep35433

Beaune, D., F. Bretagnolle, L. Bollache, G. Hohmann, M. Surbeck & B. Furth (2013). Seed dispersal strategies and the threat of defaunation in a Congo forest. Biodiversity and Conservation 22: 225–238; http://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-012-0416-x

Beckman, N. & H.C. Muller-Landau (2007). Differential effects of hunting on pre-dispersal seed predation and primary and secondary seed removal of two neotropical tree species. Biotropica 39: 328–339; http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2007.00273.x

D’Angelo, G.B. & I. Sazima (2014). Commensal association of piscivorous birds with foraging otters in south-eastern Brazil, and a comparison with such a relationship of piscivorous birds with cormorants. Journal of Natural History 48: 241–249; http://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2013.808714

Dean, W.R.J. & I.A.W. Macdonald (1981). A review of African birds feeding in association with mammals. Ostrich: Journal of African Ornithology 52: 135–155; http://doi.org/10.1080/00306525.1981.9633599

Evans, P.G.H. (1982). Associations between seabirds and cetaceans: a review. Mammal Review 12: 187–206; http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2907.1982.tb00015.x

Fredriksson, G.M. & V. Nijman (2004). Habitat use and conservation status of two elusive ground birds (Carpococcyx radiatus and Polyplectron schleiermacheri) in the Sungai Wain Protection Forest, East Kalimantan, Indonesian Borneo. Oryx 38: 297–303.

IUCN (2015). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2015.4. Downloaded on 22 May 2016.

Herrera, C.M., P. Jordano, L. Lopesoria & J.A. Amat (1994). Recruitment of a mast-fruiting, bird-dispersed tree - bridging frugivore activity and seedling establishment. Ecological Monographs 64: 315–344; http://doi.org/10.2307/2937165

Komar, O. & C.K. Hanks (2002). Fan-tailed Warbler foraging with Nine-banded Armadillos. The Wilson Bulletin 114: 526–528; http://doi.org/10.1676/0043-5643(2002)114[0526:FTWFWN]2.0.CO;2

Laman, T.G., J.L. Burnaford & C.D. Knott (1997). Bornean Ground Cuckoo observations in Gunung Palung National Park, West Kalimantan. Kukila 9: 183–85.

Long, A.J. & N.J. Collar (2002). Distribution, status and natural history of the Bornean Ground Cuckoo Carpococcyx radiatus. Forktail 18: 111–19.

López-Lánus, B., K.S. Berg, R. Strewe & P.G.W. Salaman (1999). The ecology and vocalisations of Banded Ground-Cuckoo Neomorphus radiolosus. Cotinga 11: 42–45.

Marshall, A.J., L. Beaudrot & H.U. Wittmer (2014). Responses of primates and other frugivorous vertebrates to plant resource variability over space and time at Gunung Palung National Park. International Journal of Primatology 35: 1178–1201; http://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-014-9774-4

Peres, C.A. (2000). Effects of subsistence hunting on vertebrate community structure in Amazonian forests. Conservation Biology 14: 240–253; http://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98485.x

Rasa, O.A.E. (1983). Dwarf mongoose and hornbill mutualism in the Taru Desert, Kenya. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 12: 181–190; http://doi.org/10.1007/BF00290770

Redford, K.H. (1992). The Empty Forest. BioScience 42: 412–422; http://doi.org/10.2307/1311860

Ruggiero, R.G. & H.E. Eves (1998). Bird-mammal associations in forest openings of northern Congo (Brazzaville). African Journal of Ecology 36: 183–193; http://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2028.1998.00128.x

Sazima I. & C. Sazima (2010). Cleaner birds: an overview for the Neotropics. Biota Neotropica 10: 195–203; http://doi.org/10.1590/S1676-06032010000400025

Tomazzoni, A.C., E. Pedo & S.M. Hartz (2005). Feeding associations between Capybaras Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris and birds in the Lami Biological Reserve, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande Do Sul, Brasil. Revista Brasiliera de Zoologia 22: 712–716; http://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81752005000300031

Waser, N.M., L. Chittka, M.V. Price, N.M. Williams & I. Ollerton (1996). Generalization in pollination systems, and why it matters. Ecology 77: 1043–1060; http://doi.org/10.2307/2265575

Wright, S.J., K.E. Stoner, N. Beckman, R.T. Corlett, R. Dirzo, H.C. Muller-Landau, G. A Nunez-Iturri, C.A. Peres & B.C. Wang (2007). The plight of large animals in tropical forests and the consequences for plant regeneration. Biotropica 39: 289–291; http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2007.00293.x

 

312774.jpg

 

312775.jpg

 

312776.jpg

285784.jpg