New records of three species of fish in the upper reaches of the Brahmaputra and Surma-Meghna river basins, Meghalaya, India

 

S. Dey 1, M. Manorama 2 & S.N. Ramanujam 3

 

1,2,3 Fish Biology Laboratory, Department of Zoology, School of Life Sciences, North Eastern Hill University,

Shillong, Meghalaya 793022, India

1 sankhodey@gmail.com, 2 maisnamanorama@gmail.com, 3 ramanujamsunkam@gmail.com (corresponding author)

 

 

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.o3297.7922-6 | ZooBank: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:87079625-79E8-45C3-96AA-16A3E11743A2

 

Editor: W. Vishwanath, Manipur University, Imphal, India. Date of publication: 26 October 2015 (online & print)

 

Manuscript details: Ms # o3297 | Received 07 December 2013 | Final received 15 September 2015 | Finally accepted 30 September 2015

 

Citation: Dey, S., M. Manorama & S.N. Ramanujam (2015). New records of three species of fish in the upper reaches of the Brahmaputra and Surma-Meghna river basins, Meghalaya, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 7(12): 7922–7926; http://dx.doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.o3297.7922-6

 

Copyright: © Dey et al. 2015. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. JoTT allows unrestricted use of this article in any medium, reproduction and distribution by providing adequate credit to the authors and the source of publication.

 

Funding: Ministry of Environment and Forests. Grant No. 14/17/2007-ERS/RE; September, 2008.

 

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no competing interests.

 

Acknowledgements: The authors are thankful to the Ministry of Environment and Forest, New Delhi and UPE scheme of UGC to Life Sciences, North Eastern Hill University, Shillong for financial support. The encouragement and the facilities provided by the Head of Department of Zoology for carrying out the work are gratefully acknowledged.

 

 

 

 

Abstract: Three species of fishes, viz., Bagarius yarrelli, Parambassis lala, listed Near Threatened and Hemibagrus menoda, Least Concern by IUCN, respectively belonging to the families Sisoridae, Ambassidae and Bagridae have been newly recorded from the upper reaches of the Brahmaputra and Surma-Megna river basins of Meghalaya. Diagnostic characters and brief notes on the habitat ecology of the fishes are given in this paper.

Keywords: Diagnosis, ichthyodiversity, new records, Meghalaya.

 

 

246966.jpg

 

 

 

The northeastern region of India is one of the hotspots of freshwater fish biodiversity in Asia (Kottelat & Whitten 1996) and its rich ichthyological diversity is yet to be explored properly. The region shares its fish fauna predominantly with that of the Indo-Gangetic fauna and to a small extent with the Burmese and South China fish fauna (Yadava & Chandra 1994). The hills and the undulating valleys of this area give rise to a large number of torrential hill streams, which lead to big rivers and finally, become part of the Gang-Brahmaputra, Surma-Meghna-Barak, Kolodyne and Chindwin river systems. Some of the major works on ichthyofaunal diversity carried out in northeastern India include Hora & Mukherji (1935), Menon (1974), Yazdani (1977), Sinha (1994), Nath & Dey (1997), Sen (1995, 2000, 2003), Mahapatra et al. (2003), Kar et al. (2006), Kar & Sen (2007), Vishwanath et al. (2007, 2010), Ramanujam et al. (2010).

The state of Meghalaya located in the northeastern region of India is bounded by Assam in the north and east and the plains of Bangladesh in the south and west. The state covers an area of 22,429km2 and lies between 25026010’N & 89045’–92047’E. The water bodies of the state harbour diverse fish fauna having various adaptive features suited to their hill stream environment. Important north flowing rivers of the State are Umiam, Kopili, Myntang, Jingiram and Rongai which join the Brahmaputra drainage and the south flowing rivers include Simsang Rongdi, Shella, Balat, Kynshi, Umngot, Myntdu and Bugi which drain in the Surma-Meghna drainage system. The species endemic to the State of Meghalaya include Puntius shalynius, Garra lissorhynchus, Aborichthys garoensis, Schistura barapaniensis, Schistura sijuensis, Mesonemacheilus reticulofasciatus, Pillaia indica, and Garo khajuriai (Sen 2003). The present study was aimed at updating and documenting the occurrence of new records of fish species from the upper reaches of the Brahmaputra and Surma-Meghna River basins in Meghalaya.

 

 

Materials and Methods

Random field surveys were conducted between 2008 and 2011 in the rivers and streams of Meghalaya. Fish samples were collected using cast nets, gill nets, drag nets, triangular scoop nets and a variety of local made traps and also with the help of the local fishermen. The specimens were preserved in 10% formaldehyde and deposited in the Fish Biology Lab Museum (FBLM), Department of Zoology, North Eastern Hill University, Shillong after taking digital photographs of the specimens which were in a fresh condition. Identification was done following the standard literature (Vishwanath et al. 2007; Jayaram 2010) and with the help of expertise available at the Zoological Survey of India, Shillong. Measurements were made point to point with dial calipers to the nearest 0.1mm for 15 morphometeric characters. Latitude, longitude and altitude were recorded at each site using GPS-72 (Garmin, Germany).

 

246958.jpg

 

 

 

Results

The study revealed the new records of three fish species occurring in the upper reaches of the Brahmaputra and Surma-Meghna River basins in Meghalaya. The 33 study sites in Meghalaya are shown in Fig.1. Bagarius yarrelli was recorded from the Bugi River (collection site - 25021’50.22”N & 90020’34.14”E; elevation 172m), Hemibagrus menoda from the Simsang River (collection site - 25011’30”N & 90038’30”E; elevation 153m) and Parambassis lala from two rivers, the Ganol (collection site - 25031’43.14”N & 90006’33.78”E, elevation 120m) and the Damring River (collection site - 25053’51.54”N & 90037’7.26”E; elevation 71m). Photographs of the collected specimens of Bagarius yarrelli, Hemibagrus menoda and Parambassis lala are shown in Images 1, 2 and 3. The morphometric measurements of the three new records are given in Table 1. Systematic accounts of the three new records from Meghalaya are given below:

 

 

 

Bagarius yarrelli (Sykes, 1839)

Material examined: FBLM 14.1-14.5, 5, 26.0–52.0 cm SL, 23.x.2010, Bugi River, Deku.

Diagnosis: Body and abdomen elongate, flattened up to pelvics. Head broad and body entirely or almost entirely covered by heavily keratinised skin, superficially differentiated into unculiferous plaques or tubercles. Snout sharply conical, not pointed. Mouth terminal, wide, slighty inferior. Eyes small, subcutaneous, dorsally placed at posterior half of head, not visible from below ventral surface. Lips thick. Teeth sharp, unequal in size in bands on jaws; those on lower jaw markedly heterodont, consisting of two or three rows of relatively numerous, widely separated, and much larger conical teeth. Four pairs of barbles; one pair each of maxillary, nasal and two of mandibular; maxillary barbles large. Rayed dorsal fin inserted above base of pectoral fin with seven rays and a smooth spine with an elongated soft termination. Adipose dorsal fin moderatlely long, posteriorly free. Pectoral fins with 9–14 rays and a spine serrated along inner edge and also with a soft prolongation. Pelvic fins with six rays. Anal fin short, with 14–16 rays. Caudal fin deeply forked, upper lobe longer. Pelvic fin origin usually posterior to a vertical line through base of last dorsal-fin ray. Lateral line complete, simple.

Distribution: Bangladesh, China (Yunnan), India, Nepal (IUCN 2012).

Habitat and Ecology: This species inhabits a variety of fluviatile habitats, although it is typically associated with swift, clear rivers with a substrate of rocks and sand (IUCN 2012).

Differences between Bagarius bagarius and Bagarius yarrelli: In B. bagarius the pelvic fin is inserted slightly behind the last dorsal fin ray, skin anterior and posterior to adipose fin not forming ridges or bumps, sharply contrasting light and dark colour. In B. yarrelli the pelvic fin is inserted well behind the last dorsal fin ray, skin anterior and posterior to adipose fin not forming ridges or bumps, faint light and dark colour patches on body. Similar observation in two species had been noted earlier by Vishwanath et al. (2007).

 

 

246959.jpg

 

Hemibagrus menoda (Hamilton, 1822)

Material examined: FBLM 15.1–15.5, 5, 16.4–17.4 cm SL, 29.ix.2009, Simsang River, Bagmara.

Diagnosis: Dorsal profile rising evenly but not steeply from the tip of snout to origin of dorsal fin. Body short or moderately elongated. Head depressed, broad, ventrally flattened. Eyes moderately large, oval with wide inter-orbital space. Jaws sub-equal, mouth opening crescentic. Teeth numerous, villiform and in cured bands across palate and upper jaw. Four pairs of barbels; maxillary pair longer than head length. Rayed dorsal fin with a long spine, inner surface serrated. Adipose dorsal fin moderately long, with considerable inter-space from rayed dorsal. Pectoral fins with seven or eight branched rays. Pelvic fins do not reach anal fin. Anal fin not reaching caudal base. Caudal fin deeply forked, upper lobe unequal. Lateral line complete. Large sensory pores arranged in vertical columns along side of the body. Sensory pores of lateral line system readily visible. Black dots arranged in vertical columns on the sides of body; snout convex and broad.

Distribution: Bangladesh; India (Assam, Bihar, Maharashtra, Manipur, Orissa, Tripura, West Bengal); Nepal (IUCN 2012).

Habitat and Ecology: This species inhabits rivers and larger streams (IUCN 2012).

Parambassis lala (Hamilton, 1822)

Material examined: FBLM 16.1–16.5, 10, 2.4–3.1 cm SL, 21.x.2010, Ganol River, Garobadah. FBLM 17.1–17.5, 5, 2.5–2.7 cm SL, 27.xi.2010, Damring River, Mendipathar, .

Diagnosis: Body elongate, compressed. Abdomen rounded. Head short, compressed. Snout pointed. Mouth large, gape oblique, extending to anterior border of orbit. Eyes large, superior, not visible from below ventral surface. Lips thin. Interoperculum smooth. Lateral line complete with 30–10 scales. Head moderate size, narrower than body, oval and sharp. Two dorsal fins united with six or seven spines, second dorsal with 12–14 soft rays; anal fin with three spines and with 14–16 rays. Body with three longitudinal dusky bands along sides. Caudal fin deeply emarginated.

Distribution: India (Assam, Bihar, Orissa, Tripura, West Bengal); Myanmar (IUCN 2012).

Habitat and Ecology: Inhabits ponds, ditches and pools; perhaps also brackish waters (Talwar & Jhingran 1991).

 

 

246962.jpg

 

 

Discussion

Bagarius bagarius has been reported from Meghalaya (Mahapatra et al. 2003; Sen 2003) but B. yarrelli has not been reported so far. Hemibagrus menoda and P. lala have been reported from Assam in Northeast India but they have not been reported from Meghalaya (Sen 2003). Hemibagrus menoda is often referred to as Mystus in the literature, and has sometimes been erroneously listed as Mystus corsula (due to the erroneous labelling of the figure accompanying the original description as “Mugil corsula”) by Ng & Ferraris (2000). Several authors have considered Parambassis lala as a synonym of Parambassis ranga (Day 1875; Menon 1999). Because of the small size of Parambassis lala it is also considered as the juvenile of Parambassis ranga (Fraser-Brunner 1955). Other workers, however, consider Parambassis lala as an undoubtedly distinct species (Talwar & Jhingran 1991; Roberts 1994; Jayaram 1999). All the three species mentioned above are considered as food fishes. Parambassis lala is an important ornamental fish and is over-exploited for the ornamental fish trade. It has been found out that the distribution of Bagarius yarrelli and Hemibagrus menoda is confined to only one location each, while Parambassis lala is found in two different locations out of the 33 sites surveyed. The restricted distributions of these may be either due to overexploitation or other anthropogenic activities which if continued, may threaten their survival. B. yarrelli and P. lala have already been listed as near threatened species in the IUCN Red List. Precautionary measures to lessen the destruction of the habitat have to be taken to conserve these species.

 

246963.jpg

 

 

References

 

Day, F. (1875). The fishes of India: being a natural history of the fishes known to inhabit the seas and fresh waters of India, Burma and Ceylon. Volume 1. William Dawson & Sons Ltd., London.

Fraser-Brunner, A. (1955). A synopsis of the centropomid fishes of the subfamily Chandinae with description of a new genus and two new species. Bulletin of the Raffles Museum 25: 185–213.

Hora, S.L. & D.D. Mukherji (1935). Fish of the Naga Hills Assam. Records of the Indian Museum 37: 381–404.

IUCN (2012). IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2012.1. http://www.iucnredlist.org (accessed on 27 August 2012).

Jayaram, K.C. (1999). The Freshwater Fishes of the Indian Region. Narendra Publishing House, Delhi, 551pp.

Jayaram, K.C. (2010). The Freshwater Fishes of the Indian Region, 2nd Editon. Narendra Publising House, Delhi, 616pp.

Kar, D., A.V. Nagarathna, T.V. Ramachandra & S.C. Dey (2006). Fish diversity and conservation aspect in an aquatic ecosystem in northeastern India. Zoos’ Print Journal 21(7): 2308–2315; http://dx.doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.ZPJ.1437a.2308-15

Kar, D. & N. Sen (2007). Systematic list and distribution of fish biodiversity in Mizoram, Tripura and Barak drainage in North-East India. Zoos’ Print Journal 22(3): 2599–2607; http://dx.doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.ZPJ.1571a.2599-607

Kottelat, M. & T. Whitten (1996). Freshwater Biodiversity in Asia with Special Reference to Fish: World Bank Technical Paper No. 343, The World Bank, Washington, 59pp.

Mahapatra, B.K., K. Vinod & B. Mandal (2003). Fish biodiversity of Meghalaya with note on their sustainable utilisation. Aquaculture 4(1): 1–10.

Menon, A.G.K. (1974). A Checklist of Fishes of Himalayan and Indo Gangetic Plain. Special Publication No.1. Inland Fisheries Society, India, Barrackpore, 136pp.

Menon, A.G.K. (1999). Check list-fresh water fishes of India. Records of Zoological Survey of India, Miscellaneous Publication, Occasional Paper No. 175, 366pp.

Nath, P. & S.C. Dey (1997). Fish and Fisheries of North-East India. Vol. 1. Arunachal Pradesh, xviii + 201pp.

Ng, H.H. & C.J. Ferraris Jr. (2000). A review of the genus Hemibagrus of southern Asia, with descriptions of two new species. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences 52(11): 125-142.

Ramanujam, S.N., M. Manorama & S. Dey (2010). Ichthyodiversity of Meghalaya: India. Electronic Journal of Ichthyology (2): 15–26.

Roberts, T.R. (1994). Systematic revision of tropical Asian freshwater glassperches (Ambassidae), with descriptions of three new species. Natural History Bulletin of Siam Society 42: 263290.

Sen, N. (1995). Fauna of Meghalaya. Zoological Survey of India. State Fauna series 4, Part 1: 483606.

Sen, N. (2000). Occurrence, distribution and status of diversified fish fauna of northeast India. In: Ponniah, A.G. & U.K. Sarkar (eds.). Fish Biodiversity of Northeast India. NBFGR, NATP Publication 2, India, 44pp.

Sen, N. (2003). Fish Fauna of North East India with special reference to endemic and threatened species. Records of Zoological Survey of India 101: 8199.

Sinha, M. (1994). Threatened coldwater fishes of north-eastern region of India, pp. 173176. In: Threatened Fishes of India. Natcon. Publication No. 4, 384pp.

Talwar, P.K. & A.G. Jhingran (1991). Inland Fishes of India and Adjacent Countries. Oxford-IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 1158pp.

Vishwanath, W., W.S. Lakra & U.K. Sarkar (2007). Fishes of North East India. ICAR. NBFGR. Lucknow, 264pp.

Vishwanath, W., H.H. Ng, R. Britz, L.K. Singh, S. Chaudhry & K.W. Conway (2010). The status and distribution of freshwater fishes of the Eastern Himalaya region, pp. 22–41. In: Allen D.J., S. Molur & B.A. Daniel (Compilers). The Status and Distribution of Freshwater Biodiversity in the Eastern Himalaya. Cambridge, UK and Gland, IUCN, Switzerland and Zoo Outreach Organisation, Coimbatore, India.

Yadava, Y.S. & R. Chandra (1994). Some threatened carps and catfishes of Brahmaputra river system, pp. 45–55. In: Dehadrai, P.V., P. Das & S.R. Verma (eds.). Threatened Fishes of India. Natcon Publication, Muzaffarnagar.

Yazdani, G.M. (1977). Fishes of Khasi Hills, Meghalaya (India) with observations on their distributional pattern. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 74: 17–28.