Reply
to the Response to Pande et
al. by Jathar & Patil
Satish A. Pande 1, Amit P. Pawashe 2,
Raju Kasambe 3 & Reuven Yosef 3,4
1,2 Ela Foundation, C-9
Bhosale Park, Sahakar Nagar-2, Pune, Maharashtra 411009, India
3 Sevadal Mahila Mahavidyalaya,
Sakkardara chowk, Umrer Road, Nagpur, Maharashtra 440009, India
4 International Birding & Research
Centre in Eilat, P.O. Box 774, Eilat 88000, Israel
Email: 1 pande.satish@gmail.com, 4 ryosef@eilatcity.co.il (corresponding
author),
Date of publication (online): 26 May
2011
Date of publication (print): 26 May
2011
ISSN 0974-7907 (online) | 0974-7893
(print)
Manuscript details:
Ms # o2803
Received 13 May 2011
Citation: Pande, S.A., A.P.
Pawashe, R. Kasambe & R. Yosef(2011). Reply to the Response to Pande et al. by Jathar & Patil. Journal of Threatened Taxa3(5): 1804.
Copyright: ©Satish A. Pande,
Amit P. Pawashe, Raju Kasambe & Reuven Yosef2011. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.JoTT allows unrestricted use of this article in any medium for non-profit purposes,
reproduction and distribution by providing adequate credit to the authors and
the source of publication.
a. We appreciate the effort that has been put into “researching”
our paper (Pande et al. 2011) and adding to the information on this Critically
Endangered species by Jathar & Patil (2011).
b. We feel that without going into the field and watching the
birds the arguments will remain semantic and unresolved.
c. We will be only too happy to recognize that we were wrong in
our assumptions and the hybridization does not occur in the Forest Owlet. This will remove once and for all any
doubts. However, it does require going into the field.
d. We prefer to abstain from mud-slingingbecause we believe in what we saw in the field and will be glad to stand
corrected. However, we do not
believe that wildlife in general, or “sexy” species in particular, be
monopolized by a group of researchers or an organization.
e. However, we are also extremely glad to have raised the issue
and that several readers-researchers have commented on the contents. We recognize that it is controversial
but we also recognize the power of fair discussion in science. That means that we have the right to
question any and all decisions made by authorities based on studies by other
researchers, including yourselves, if the internal reports and publications are
made available to the public or in the form of peer-reviewed publications.
f. Hopefully, the authorities will also recognize the importance
of collecting field samples in order to answer the controversial questions -
even if it is a Schedule I species! Adopting a hands-off policy because no one
is ready to shoulder responsibility is not the way of the world.
g. We look forward to reading the respondents forthcoming
publications in order to further understand the conclusions reached and the
methods applied. We hope to learn from their expertise.
i. We invite the respondents to convene with us
and to discuss our shortcomings, ideas and findings in a friendly manner.
j. We think that it would be a good idea to convene a (inter?)
national symposium focused on the species. This will bring other researchers
interested in the species, to learn from the experience of those who have
worked closely with the Forest Owlet, and to enhance their conservation through
knowledge and cooperation of all involved.
References
Jathar, G. & D. Patil (2011). A review of “Discovery
of possible hybrid of the Critically Endangered Forest Owlet Athene blewitti and Spotted Owlet Athene brama from northern Maharashtra”. Journal of
Threatened Taxa 3(5): 1800–1803.
Pande,
S.A., A.P. Pawashe, R. Kasambe & R. Yosef (2011). Discovery of
a possible hybrid of the Critically Endangered Forest Owlet Athene blewitti and Spotted Owlet Athene brama (Aves: Strigiformes) from
northern Maharashtra, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 3(4): 1727–1730.