Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 September 2026 | 18(9): 29784–29786

 

ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) 

https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.10315.18.9.29784-29786

#10315 | Received 18 December 2025 | Final received 03 July 2026 | Finally accepted 08 September 2026

 

 

Toil in the soil: putative nest excavation by an adult female Panther Chameleon Furcifer pardalis (Cuvier, 1829) in moist, clayey soil on Nosy Komba, Madagascar

 

Hinrich Kaiser 1 & Przemysław Zdunek 2       

 

1 Department of Biology, Victor Valley College, 18422 Bear Valley Road, Victorville, California 92395, USA; and Department of Vertebrate Zoology, Leibniz-Institut zur Analyse des Biodiversitätswandels, Museum Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany.

Present address: School of Biological Sciences, Kadoorie Biological Sciences Building, Pok Fu Lam Road, Hong Kong.

2 Pôle Sup Nature, 205 Rue de l’Acropole, 34000 Montpellier, France; and NATRIX Herpetological Association, ul. Opolska 41/1, 52-010 Wrocław, Poland.

1 hinrich.kaiser@vvc.edu, 2 zdunek.komodo@gmail.com (corresponding author)

 

 

Editor: S.R. Ganesh, Kalinga Foundation, Agumbe, India.            Date of publication: 26 September 2026 (online & print)

 

Citation: Kaiser, H. & P. Zdunek (2026). Toil in the soil: putative nest excavation by an adult female Panther Chameleon Furcifer pardalis (Cuvier, 1829) in moist, clayey soil on Nosy Komba, Madagascar. Journal of Threatened Taxa 18(9): 29784–29786. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.10315.18.9.29784-29786  

  

Copyright: © Kaiser & Zdunek 2026. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. JoTT allows unrestricted use, reproduction, and distribution of this article in any medium by providing adequate credit to the author(s) and the source of publication.

 

Funding: We acknowledge financial support received in support of student travel from the VVC Foundation and the Associate Student Body of Victor Valley College.

 

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

 

Acknowledgements: This observation was made during a student trip under the auspices of the Tropical Research Initiative at Victor Valley College. We thank the Victor Valley College Foundation and the Associated Student Body of Victor Valley College (ASB) for financial support of student travel, and we wish to express our gratitude to Robert Sewell for facilitating the ASB funding. We also extend our appreciation to the staff of the Eco-Gîte Akiba (https://akibakomba.org/eco-gite) for welcoming us and for making our stay very productive.

 

 

The Panther Chameleon Furcifer pardalis (Cuvier, 1829), is common across various parts of Madagascar, especially in the central-northeastern and northwestern regions (Ferguson et al. 2004). It inhabits a variety of environments, including humid, semi-humid, and transitional areas (Andreone et al. 2005; Glaw & Vences 2007; Deso et al. 2022). These chameleons are primarily edge dwellers (Ries et al. 2017), found in undisturbed canopy forests and capable of adapting well to anthropogenic habitats. They have also been introduced to disparate regions around the world (e.g., Florida, USA, and Réunion Island; Cheke 1987; Rabearivony et al. 2007; Rochford et al. 2013; Deso et al. 2022). Despite being actively collected and traded internationally as pets (Andreone et al. 2005; Carpenter et al. 2005), there is limited knowledge about the natural history and reproductive behaviour of F. pardalis in the wild (Rabearivony et al. 2007; Eppley 2019), but all records we were able to find either attest exclusively to the use of sandy soils as the site for oviposition (Rabearivony et al. 2007; Negro & Negro 2017; Eppley 2019; Laube et al. 2021) or are silent on the matter (e.g., McGeough 2016). We here present the first observation of an adult female F. pardalis digging in moist non-sandy soil under circumstances consistent with nest excavation, thereby expanding our understanding of the species’ reproductive ecology.

The observation was made on 03 February 2020 at 1153 h on Nosy Komba (also known as Nosy Ambariovato), a small island (13.4506° S, 48.3421° E; area 27.9 km2) located off the coast of northwestern Madagascar between the main island and Nosy Bé. The observation occurred in a typical secondary tropical forest (Hyde Roberts & Daly 2014) at an elevation of ca. 300 m, which was classified as a “closed canopy forest” of native non-cultivated species that may include mango and jackfruit by Blumgart et al. (2017). A deep blue-violet F. pardalis (snout–vent length ca. 12 cm) was observed actively excavating a burrow (Image 1A). The approximate size of the lizard, indicative of its maturity level, and its colouration are associated with gravid adult females approaching oviposition (Eppley 2019). The observer’s attention was drawn to the moist, compacted soil (“clayey soil”; Firoozi et al. 2016), in which the female dug using her left limbs in concert, the front limb to excavate and the rear limb to move the soil further behind her (Image 1B). While no soil samples were taken for further analysis, qualitative evaluation showed that this type of dark soil had relatively high moisture content and felt very sticky (hence our use of the term “clayey”), very unlike the type of sandy soil depicted by Laube et al. (2021). The temperature at the time of observation was 29°C with > 80% humidity, no wind, and clear skies above the canopy cover. To avoid disturbing the animal, the observation lasted only 5 min, during which several photos and videos were taken from a suitable distance. Because these obligatorily arboreal lizards rarely descend to the ground and do not dig for foraging or escape, the observed digging is most parsimoniously interpreted as oviposition behaviour. The combination of size and colouration associated with the pre-oviposition condition by an adult female and directed burrow excavation is consistent with previously described nest-digging behaviour in F. pardalis.

Data on the reproduction of F. pardalis in the wild remain limited, and available published observations have associated oviposition with sandy soils (e.g., Rabearivony et al. 2007; Eppley 2019; Strand 2023). To the best of our knowledge, our observation is the first documented instance of a F. pardalis female digging in moist, clayey soil under circumstances consistent with nest construction. Egg deposition was not observed, and we therefore cannot confirm that the excavation ultimately resulted in a completed nest or oviposition. Nevertheless, the female’s size, colouration and directed excavation behaviour are consistent with previously described pre-oviposition behaviour in F. pardalis (e.g., Rabearivony et al. 2007; Eppley 2019). The observation therefore demonstrates that F. pardalis can excavate a moist, cohesive, non-sandy substrate during probable nest construction. Whether such substrates are regularly used for completed oviposition will require additional field observations.

Females of this species may have a limited home range or microhabitat preferences (Gehring et al. 2008), which could indicate that this individual might return to this location or has already used it, but this is speculative. Furcifer pardalis females rarely survive longer than a year in the wild; they exhibit high fecundity, with clutch sizes ranging from 10–40 eggs, and reproductive activity begins at around 6 mo old, followed by additional clutches every 3 mo thereafter (Müller et al. 2004; Andreone et al. 2005). Nest construction usually takes several hours, and females lay their eggs within an hour or two (Bolton & Abate 2002), which, to some extent, explains the choice of a loose substrate in terms of energy cost. Eppley (2019) showed the first evidence of spatiotemporal oviposition planning by this species. Observations such as these, even as single events, can broaden the scope of information about the natural history and ecology of F. pardalis and their reproductive behaviour.

 

For image - - click here for full PDF

 

References

 

Andreone, F. et al. (2005). Life history traits, age profile, and conservation of the panther chameleon, Furcifer pardalis (Cuvier 1829), at Nosy Be, NW Madagascar. Tropical Zoology 18: 209–225.https://doi.org/10.1080/03946975.2005.10531221

Blumgart, D. et al. (2017). Herpetological diversity across intact and modified habitats of Nosy Komba Island, Madagascar. Journal of Natural History 51: 625–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2017.1287312

Bolton, J. & A. Abate (2002). Multigenerational captive reproduction of Furcifer pardalis and Furcifer oustaleti. Chameleon Information Network Journal 44: 5–10.

Carpenter, A.I. et al. (2005). The impacts of international and national governance changes on a traded resource: a case study of Madagascar and its chameleon trade. Biological Conservation 123: 279–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2004.11.015

Cheke, A. (1987). Species accounts: the native fauna – reptiles (tortoises, marine turtles, lizards, snakes), pp. 51–59. In: Diamond A.W. (ed.). Studies of Mascarene Island Birds. University Press, Cambridge, UK, 458 pp. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.240.4855.1076

Deso, G. et al. (2022). Panther chameleons Furcifer pardalis using aerial cables in urban habitats. Herpetological Bulletin 162: 43–44. https://doi.org/10.33256/hb162.4344

Eppley, T.M. (2019). Evidence of spatiotemporal planning in a panther chameleon (Furcifer pardalis) on the Masoala Peninsula, Madagascar. Herpetology Notes 12: 909–911.

Ferguson, G.W. et al. (2004). The Panther Chameleon: Color Variation, Natural History, Conservation, and Captive Management. Krieger Publishing Company, Malabar, Florida, USA.

Firoozi, A.A. et al. (2016). A review of clayey soils. Asian Journal of Applied Sciences 4: 1319–1330.

Gehring, P-S., et al. (2008). Habitat preferences and activity patterns of Furcifer pardalis (Cuvier, 1829) in the Masoala Rain Forest Hall of the Zurich Zoo. Salamandra 44: 129–140.

Glaw, F. & M. Vences (2007). Field Guide to the Amphibians and Reptiles of Madagascar. 3rd edition. Vences & Glaw Verlag, Cologne, Germany.

Hyde-Roberts S. & C. Daly (2014). A rapid herpetofaunal assessment of Nosy Komba Island, northwestern Madagascar, with new locality records for seventeen species. Salamandra 50: 18–26.

Laube, A. et al. (2021). Annual cycle of soil temperatures in the dry forest of Ankarafantsika, Ambato-Boeny region, West Madagascar. Chamaeleo 32(1): 89–100.

McGeough, R. (2016). Furcifer pardalis (Panther Chameleon) – a brief species description and details on captive husbandry. Biology, Engineering, Medicine and Science Reports 2(2): 27–38.

Müller, R. et al. (2004). Furcifer pardalis. Das Panther Chamäleon. Natur und Tier-Verlag, Münster, Germany.

Negro, T. & A. Negro (2017). Gravidity and egg deposition. https://www.madcham.de/en/traechtigkeit-und-eiablage. Accessed on 20.vii.2026.

Rabearivony, J. et al. (2007). Habitat use and abundance of a low-altitude chameleon assemblage in eastern Madagascar. The Herpetological Journal 17: 247–254.

Ries, L. et al. (2017). Closing persistent gaps in knowledge about edge ecology. Current Landscape Ecology Reports 2: 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40823-017-0022-4

Rochford, M.R. et al. (2013). The Panther Chameleon, Furcifer pardalis (Cuvier 1829) (Chamaeleonidae), another introduced chameleon species in Florida. Reptiles and Amphibians 20: 205–207. https://doi.org/10.17161/randa.v20i4.13974

Strand, B. (2023). Chameleon Academy, Chameleon lays eggs in Madagascar! https://youtu.be/OlV_Eim-ylk. Accessed on 20.vii.2026.