Ethnozoological use of primates in northeastern India
Main Article Content
Abstract
Ethnozoological practices to cure various diseases have a long history. Communities that reside near the forest collect wild animals and their derivatives to prepare medicines and get relief from diseases. Northeastern India is home to many tribes with vast traditional ethnobiological knowledge, and there are many reports of zootherapeutic uses in the region. In an attempt to understand primate-based ethnozoologic use in the area a literature survey was carried out using different sources. The findings revealed that Hoolock hoolock was the most used species among the primates (48 %), followed by Macaca assamensis (20 %) and Macaca mulatta (10 %). Among the materials used, the flesh of primates was the most dominant (43 %), followed by the blood (20 %) and brain (14 %). This paper highlights the negative effects of ethno-medicinal uses of primates to draw the attention of conservationists and encourage conservation education to address the damage to primates in the name of health care. Government agencies are also requested to strengthen health care systems to discourage the killing of valuable primate species.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors own the copyright to the articles published in JoTT. This is indicated explicitly in each publication. The authors grant permission to the publisher Wildlife Information Liaison Development (WILD) Society to publish the article in the Journal of Threatened Taxa. The authors recognize WILD as the original publisher, and to sell hard copies of the Journal and article to any buyer. JoTT is registered under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which allows authors to retain copyright ownership. Under this license the authors allow anyone to download, cite, use the data, modify, reprint, copy and distribute provided the authors and source of publication are credited through appropriate citations (e.g., Son et al. (2016). Bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) of the southeastern Truong Son Mountains, Quang Ngai Province, Vietnam. Journal of Threatened Taxa 8(7): 8953–8969. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.2785.8.7.8953-8969). Users of the data do not require specific permission from the authors or the publisher.
References
Alexander, J.S., J. McNamara, J.M. Rowcliffe, J. Oppong & E.J. Milner-Gulland (2014). The role of bushmeat in a West African agricultural landscape. Oryx 49: 643–651. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605313001294
Ali, A.N.M.I & I. Das (2003). Tribal situation in north-east India. Studies of Tribes and Tribals 1(2): 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/0972639X.2003.11886492
Alves, R.R.N. & H.N. Alves (2011). The faunal drugstore: Animal-based remedies used in traditional medicines in Latin America. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 7: 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-7-9
Alves, R.R.N. (2012). Relationships between fauna and people and the role of ethnozoology in animal conservation. Ethnobiology and Conservation 1: 1–69. https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2012-8-1.2-1-69
Alves, R.R.N., W.M.S. Souto & R.R.D. Barboza (2010). Primates in traditional folk medicine: a world overview. Mammal Review 40(2): 155–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2907.2010.00158.x
Berkes, F. (2009). Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management 90: 1692–1702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.001
Betlu, A.L.S. (2013). Indigenous knowledge of zootherapeutic use among the Biate tribe of DimaHasao District, Assam, Northeastern India. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedcine 9: 56. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-9-56
Chetry, D., R. Medhi, J. Biswas, D. Das & P.C. Bhattacharjee (2003). Nonhuman primates in the Namdapha National Park, Arunachal Pradesh. India. International Journal of Primatology 24: 383–388. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023057401967
Chinlampianga, M., R.K. Singh & A.C. Shukla (2013). Ethno-zoological diversity of northeast India: Empirical learning with traditional knowledge holders of Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge 12(1): 18–30. http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/15342
Choudhury, A. (2013). The Mammals of North-East India, first ed. Gibbon Books and the Rhino Foundation for nature in NE India, Guwahati, India. https://www.nhbs.com/the-mammals-of-north-east-india-book
Das, D. (2015). Ethno-zoological practices among tribal inhabitants in Khowai district of Tripura, north-east India. Journal of Global Bioscience 4(9): 3364–3372.
Devi, S.N. & S. Radhakrishna (2013). Attitude towards primates and primate conservation in Manipur, north-east India. Asian Primates Journal 3(1): 29–35. http://eprints.nias.res.in/id/eprint/708
Ferreira, F.S., U.P. Albuquerque, H.D.M. Coutinho, W.O. Almeida & R.R.N. Alves (2012). The trade in medicinal animals in northeastern Brazil. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2012: 20. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/126938
Hockings, K.J. (2007). Human-chimpanzee coexistence at Bossou, the Republic of Guinea: A chimpanzee perspective. Unpublished Ph.D thesis, Department of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, UK. http://hdl.handle.net/1893/189
Hockings, K.I. (2016). Mitigating Human–Nonhuman Primate Conflict. In: The International Encyclopedia of Primatology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119179313.wbprim0053
IUCN Red List (2020). https://www.iucnredlist.org/search?query=primate&searchType=species
Jamir, N.S. & P. Lal (2005). Ethnoscientific practices among Naga tribes. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge 4(1): 100–104. http://nopr.niscair.res.in/bitstream/123456789/8501/1/IJTK%204(1)%20100-104.pdf?q=lumami
Jugli, S., J. Chakravorty & V.B. Meyer-Rochow (2019). Zootherapeutic uses of animals and their parts: an important element of the traditional knowledge of the Tangso and Wancho of eastern Arunachal Pradesh, north-east India. Environment, Development and Sustainability 22: 4699–4734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00404-6
Lalramnghinglova, H. (1999). Ethnobiology in Mizoram state: folklore medico-zoology. Bulletin of the Indian Institute of History of Medicine 29(2): 123–148.
Lee, P.C. (2010). Sharing space: can etoprimatology contribute to the survival of non-human primates in human-dominated globalized landscapes? American Journal of Primatology 72(10): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20789
Mittermeier, R.A., C.Valladares-Padua, A.B. Rylands, A.A. Eudey, T.M. Butynski, J.U. Ganzhorn, R. Kormos, J.M. Aguiar & S. Walker (2005). The world’s 25 most endangered primates 2004–2006. IUCN/SSC Primate Specialist Group, International Primatological Society and Conservation International, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Mittermeier, R.A., J. Ratsimbazafy, A.B. Rylands, L. Williamson, J.F. Oates, D. Mbora, J.U. Ganzhorn, E. Rodriguez-Luna, E. Palacios, E.W. Heymann, M.C.M. Kierulff, L. Yongcheng, J. Supriatna & C. Roos (2007). Primates in peril: the world’s 25 most endangered primates, 2006–2008. Primate Conservation 22: 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1896/052.024.0101
Nekaris, K.A.I., C.R. Shepherd, C.R. Starr & V. Nijman (2010). Exploring cultural drivers for wildlife trade via an ethnoprimatological approach: a case study of slender and slow Lorises (Loris and Nycticebus) in South and Southeast Asia. American Journal of Primatology 72: 877–886. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20842
Riley, E.P. & A. Fuentes (2011). Conserving social-ecological systems in Indonesia: human-nonhuman primate interconnections in Bali and Sulawesi. American Journal of Primatology 73: 62–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20834
Riley, E.P. (2010). The importance of human-macaque folklore for conservation in Lore Lindu National Park, Sulawesi, Indonesia. Oryx 44: 235–240. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605309990925
Ronghang, R., R. Teron, K.A. Tamuli & C.R. Rajkhowa (2011). Traditional zootherapy practiced among the Karbis of Assam (India). The Ecoscan 1: 161–166.
Solanki, G.S. & P. Chutia (2009). Studies on ethno-medicinal aspects and zoo-therapy in tribal communities in Arunachal Pradesh, India. International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences 35(1): 67–76.
Solanki, G.S. & P. Chutia (2004). Ethno-zoological and socio-cultural aspects of Monpas of Arunachal Pradesh. Journal of Human Ecology 15(4): 251–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/09709274.2004.11905701
Solanki, G.S. (2006). Diversity in use pattern of faunal resources in tribal communities in Arunachal Pradesh. Final technical report. Submitted to G.B. Pant Institute of Himalayan Environment and Development, Kosi-Katarmal, Almora, India.
Srivastava, A. (2006). Conservation of threatened primate species of northeast India. Primate Conservation 20: 107–113. https://doi.org/10.1896/0898-6207.20.1.107
Stafford, C.A., J. Allarcon-Valenzuela, J. Patino, R.F. Preziosi & W.I. Sellers (2016). Know your monkey: Identifying primate conservation challenges in an indigenous Kichwa community using an ethnoprimatological approach. Folia Primatology 87: 31–47. https://doi.org/10.1159/000444414
Svensson, M.S., D.J. Ingram, K.A.I. Nekaris & V. Nijman (2015). Trade and ethno-zoological use of African lorisiformes in the last 20 years. Hystrix 26(2): 153–161. https://doi.org/10.4404/hystrix-26.2-11492
Talukdar, N.R., P. Choudhury, R.A. Barbhuiya, B. Singh & D. Daolagupu (2021). Mammals of northeastern India: an updated checklist. Journal of Threatened Taxa 13(4): 18059–18098. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.6010.13.4.18059-18098