Journal of Threatened Taxa | | 26 February 2016 | 8(2): 8421–8433






Rediscovery, systematics and proposed Red List status of Ledebouria junnarensis S.S. Rahangdale and S.R. Rahangdale nom. nov. (Asparagaceae) - an endemic species from the Western Ghats, Maharashtra, India

Savita Sanjaykumar Rahangdale 1 & Sanjaykumar Ramlal Rahangdale 2



1 Department of Botany, B.J. Arts, Commerce & Science College, Ale, Pune District, Maharashtra 412411, India

2 Department of Botany, A.W. Arts, Science & Commerce College, Otur, Pune District, Maharashtra 412409, India

1, 2 (corresponding author)








Editor: N.P. Balakrishnan, Retd. Joint Director, BSI, Coimbatore, India. Date of publication: 26 February 2016 (online & print)


Manuscript details: Ms # 2167 | Received 20 July 2015 | Final received 03 February 2016 | Finally accepted 05 February 2016


Citation: Rahangdale, S.S. & S.R. Rahangdale (2016). Rediscovery, systematics and proposed Red List status of Ledebouria junnarensis S.S. Rahangdale and S.R. Rahangdale nom. nov. (Asparagaceae) - an endemic species from the Western Ghats, Maharashtra, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 8(2): 8421–8433;


Copyright: © Rahangdale & Rahangdale 2016. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. JoTT allows unrestricted use of this article in any medium, reproduction and distribution by providing adequate credit to the authors and the source of publication.


Funding: None.


Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no competing interests.


Author Details: Savita Sanjaykumar Rahangdale holds a PhD in Angiosperm taxonomy with special reference to impact of anthropocentric developmental activities on floristic composition from Agharkar Research Institute, Pune and works as Assistant Professor in Botany. She is Fellow of Indian Association for Angiosperm Taxonomy (IAAT) and Indian Association of Biological Sciences. Sanjaykumar Ramlal Rahangdale holds PhD in classical Genetics from Agharkar Research Institute, Pune and works as Associate Professor & Head, Department of Botany. Presently, he is working on Pteridophytes of northern Western Ghats, Maharashtra. Also works with State Department of Forests for assessment and conservation of plant diversity.


Author Contribution: SSR contributed in the taxonomic part of the study materials, while SRR dealt with cytology, anatomy and comparisons with the other species. The paper was written jointly by both the authors with equal contribution.


Acknowledgements: Authors sincerely thank Dr. Brita Stedje, University of Oslo, Norway and Dr. Bohumil Trávniček, Palacky University, Czech Republic for providing valuable literature and suggestions. Critical suggestions and support from Dr. Aparna Watve of Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Tuljapur Campus are also gratefully acknowledged. The thanks are due to Hon. Editor Dr. N.P. Balakrishnan for his valuable suggestions about nomenclature and Dr. Sanjay Molur for the help in IUCN analysis. The help extended from Botanical Survey of India, Western Circle, Pune; Agharkar Research Institute, Pune and Blatter Herbarium, St Xavier’s College, Mumbai is also being acknowledged with sincere thanks. We also thank the Department of Forests, Government of Maharashtra for support during the field work and the Management authorities and Principals of DGM’s B.J. Arts, Commerce and Science College, Ale and PDEA’s A.W. College, Otur for facilities.




Abstract: A new name in the genus Ledebouria Roth is validated for Scilla viridis Blatter & Hallberg [non Scilla viridis (L.) Salisbury]. It is rediscovered after about 85 years of its first and only report. It is also redescribed on the basis of morphology, anatomy, cytology and assigned the name Ledebouria junnarensis S.S. Rahangdale & S.R. Rahangdale belonging to the family Asparagaceae, subfamily Hyacinthoideae. As this is a species endemic to the Western Ghats, Maharashtra, India, it is studied for threat status as per IUCN criteria & guidelines and assigned the status Critically Endangered B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii). Identification keys for the genera and species of subfamily Hyacinthoideae reported from India are prepared on the basis of reported and observed characters.


Keywords: Asparagaceae, cytology, Critically Endangered, endemic, Hyacinthoideae, India, IUCN Red List assessment, Maharashtra, Nomen novum, systematics, Western Ghats.



Marathi Abstract: SatavarI kuLatIla laoiDbaaoiryaa p`jaatImaQaIla ‘]nmaadkMd’ ikMvaa ‘puYpayaitkMd’ mhNajao isalaa ivhirDIsa bla^Tr va halabaga- *yaa jaatIsaazI naivana vaanasaSaas~Iya naava AiQakRt krNyaat Aalao Aaho. hI vanasptI itcyaa p`qama va ekmaova naaoMdInaMtr 85 poxaa jaast vaYaa-MnaI punaSaao-iQat krNyaat AalaI Aaho. saaobatca itcyaa baa*yaaMgaÊ AMtrMgaÊ p`jananaÊ tsaoca kaoiSakIya vaanasaSaas~Iya AByaasaanaMtr punava-iNa-t k$na laoiDbaaoiryaa jaunnaroMisasa esa.esa. rhaMgaDalao va esa.Aar. rhaMgaDalao Asao navanaamaaMkrNa kolao Aaho. hI vanasptI maharaYT/atIla ]%%ar piScama GaaTamaQyao sqaanabad\Qa AsalyaamauLo itcaa Aaya.yau.saI.ena. caI AaMtrraYTIya maanako va maaga-dSa-k t%vaaMnausaar saKaola AByaasa k$na *yaa vanasptIsa ‘AtIBayaga`st’ jaatI mhNaUna p`maaiNat krNyaat yaot Aaho. saaobatca *yaa kuLatIla Baartat AaZLt Asalaolyaa laoiDbaaoiryaa ³KajakMd´ saar#yaa [tr p`jaatI va %yaatIla jaatIMcaI AaoLK pTivaNyaasaazI AaoLK ikllaI sadr SaaoQainabaMQaat doNyaat AalaI Aaho.









The genus Ledebouria Roth of the family Asperagaceae, subfamily Hyacinthoideae is distributed in tropical Africa and Asia including India. The genus was described on the basis of the type species L. hyacinthina Roth from India in 1821 (Venter 2008). The species was later placed in the genus Scilla L. under the section Ledebouria involving many species of genus Scilla by Baker (1870). After the study of South African bulbous Liliaceae collections, Jessop (1970) reinstated the genus Ledebouria, on the basis of bulb with deciduous leaves, erect/flaccid inflorescences, pair of basal ovules in each locule and stipitate ovary. A revision of the genus Ledebouria for South Africa and sub-Saharan collections was done by Venter (2008), comprising more than 60 species. Based on his observations, he stated that, there may be more than one species of this genus in India.

Speta (1998a) revised the family Hyacinthaceae and on the basis of morphological, anatomical, developmental, and biochemical characters delimited a total of 65 genera of the family under five subfamilies, viz.: Chlorogaloideae Speta, Oziroeoideae Speta, Urgineoideae Speta, Ornithogloideae Speta and Hyacinthoideae Link. According to her the genus Ledebouria comprising about 50 species and Fessia Speta comprising about 10 species are represented by 1 or 2 species in India, while the genus Scilla L. (sensu stricto) comprising about 30 species is naturally distributed in European, south-west Asian and Mediterranean regions but does not occur in India as well as south of the Sahara. Speta (1998a) also commented that sexual reproduction is predominant; besides this, agamospermy and vegetative reproduction by bulbils may also occur in some taxa. Lenski (1958) reported that, some species of Ledebouria produce bulbils on the leaf tips. The phylogenetic linkages of the taxa in family Hyacinthaceae were studied by Pfosser & Speta (1999) on the basis of plastid DNA sequences. They placed the genus Scilla in Scilla clade, Fessia with two species complexes: (1) the S. hohenackeri Fischer & Meyers group and (2) the S. bisotunensis Speta group in Fessia clade and Ledebouria in Massonieae clade. On the basis of phylogenetic and molecular characters it has been shown that the genus Scilla is not monophyletic and divided into several smaller genera, viz.: Zagrosia Speta, Prospero Salisbury, Othocallis Salisbury, Nectaroscilla Parlatore, Fessia and Scilla (Pfosser & Speta 1999). Further, Stedje (2001) emphasized the use of qualitative morphological characters for generic delimitation of Hyacinthaceae and the molecular or quantitative data as supportive information. Thus, on the basis of the above facts it is clear that the Indian taxa treated under the genus Scilla need critical observations and revision to resolve the taxonomic ambiguity.

In older Indian floras (Hooker 1892; Cooke 1958) genus Scilla L. has been treated under the family Liliaceae. In India, only three species of this genus were recorded: S. hohenackeri Fischer & Meyers, S. hyacinthina (Roth) J.F. McBride, and S. viridis Blatter & Hallberg (Deb & Dasgupta 1981; Karthikeyan et al. 1989). The Indian species traditionally placed in the genus Scilla L., are now segregated into three distinct clades (i.e., the Massonieae clade, Fessia clade and Scilla clade) and taxonomically treated as Ledebouria revoluta (L.f.) Jessop (Syn. Ledebouria hyacinthina Roth, Scilla hyacinthina (Roth) J.F. McBride, S. indica Baker) (Lebatha et al. 2006; Venter 2008; Govaerts 2013); Fessia hohenackeri (Fisch. & C.A. Mey.) Speta (Syn. Scilla hohenackeri Fischer & Meyers) (Govaerts 2013); and Scilla viridis Blatter & Hallberg. Recently, a new species, Ledebouria hyderabadensis Ramana, Prasanna & Venu with erect leaves, without blotches on leaves, penicillate stigma and 1 or 2 lobed capsules, was described from Hyderabad and surrounding areas having a close affinity to L. revoluta and was added to the Indian flora (Ramana et al. 2012).

Of these, S. viridis Blatt. & Hallb. is endemic to Maharashtra (India) and considered to be ‘possibly extinct’ (Mishra & Singh 2001). The species was collected for the first time from ‘Khandala’ [Centre of ‘Khandala’ Village 1800’N & 73023’E (as per Santapau 1958)] by ­­­McCann in vegetative state in September 1918. It was planted in St. Xaviers College, Mumbai, where it bloomed in the month of March 1919 and based on this flowering it was described as a new species with the Holotype-14500 (BLAT!) by Blatter & Hallberg (1921). The original protologue of the species comprises only description in the Latin and type specimen, without any figure, geographic coordinates, elevation or ecological notes. Santapau (1958) did not record the species from ‘Khandala’ in his ‘The Flora of Khandala on the Western Ghats of India’. Subsequent attempts by different taxonomists were also unfruitful in collection of the species from Khandala, the type location or elsewhere (Mishra & Singh 2001). Only the Holotype - 14500 (BLAT!) is the proof for its occurrence in India (Blatter & Hallberg 1921; Santapau 1958). Therefore, Nayar & Sastry (1987) included it in the Red Data Book under Endangered category and also by Sharma et al. (1996). While doing a reassessment of threatened flowering plants of Maharashtra, Mishra & Singh (2001) were also unable to re-collect the species and it was declared ‘probably extinct’. The Plant List placed it in the category of ‘unresolved taxa names’ because of deficiency of information on the taxon and also non-availability of the authentic specimens (The Plant List 2015).

In the year 2005 during the month of June, the present authors collected interesting specimens, which were distinct from commonly occurring Ledebouria revoluta, from Durgawadi-Pimparwadi area of Taluk Junnar, District Pune, Maharashtra State. The vegetative and reproductive characters of the specimens resulted in their identification as S. viridis Blatt. & Hallb. (Rahangdale 2008). Moreover, as there are eco-morphs and cytological variations in L. revoluta, and S. viridis was considered to be possibly extinct, it was decided that, the specimens needed further confirmation on the basis of critical observations, comparison with specimens of other species and detailed study.

The homonymy in the species remained unnoticed for a long time and Karthikeyan et al. (1989), Sharma et al. (1996), and Mishra & Singh (2001) considered the taxa, S. viridis and S. hohenackeri as accepted names in their works. In the Flora of Maharashtra (Almeida 2009), S. viridis was transferred to the genus Ledebouria Roth as a new combination Ledebouria viridis (Blatt. & Hallb.) S. Datta and P. Harvey based on the holotype McCann, Blatter 14500, with description in English on the basis of the original Latin protologue and Scilla viridis Blatt. & Hallb. as a synonym. Interestingly, in the original protologue and the description in the Flora of Maharashtra (Almeida 2009) there is no comment on the leaf characters. Until the year 2015, the species was placed as an ‘unresolved taxon’ on the databases of The Plant list (2015) and IPNI (2015) (both accessed on 22 June 2015); while S. hohenackeri as a synonym of Fessia hohenackeri (The Plant list 2015). On 14 August 2015 the status of the taxon under study, at IPNI was revised by Prof. K.N. Gandhi and named Ledebouria viridis S.R. Datta & P. Harvey ex Almeida with the remark, ‘The protologue shows Ledebouria viridis as a new combination’ (IPNI 2015; assessed on 03 January 2016).

On searching the literature, it was found that, the name Scilla viridis Blatter & Hallberg is a later homonym of Scilla viridis (L.) Salisbury, [Prodr. Stirp. Chap. Allerton 243. 1796; with the synonyms Lachenalia viridis Soland. in Ait. Hort. Kew, v.1, p: 462 and Hyacinthus viridis L. Sp. Pl. ed. 2, p: 554]. The types are also different for both these homonyms. Therefore, according to ICBN Article 53.1 (McNeil et al. 2012) Scilla viridis Blatt. & Hallb. becomes an illegitimate name. Later, the species was transferred to the genus Ledebouria Roth as Ledebouria viridis (Blatt. & Hallb.) S. Datta & P. Harvey and validly published as per ICBN Article 41.8. It is a new combination based on the illegitimate name Scilla viridis Blatt. & Hallb. and its only type. Thus, the new combination also becomes illegitimate as per ICBN Article 58.1 (Ex.1.) and Article 11.4 (For any taxon below the rank of genus, the correct name is the combination of the final epithet of the earliest legitimate name of the taxon in the same rank with the correct name of the genus to which it is assigned). Therefore, a new name is required for the taxon.

As the species has been re-collected after about 85 years since its first and only collection, its IUCN categorization was also needed. Hence, after a critical study during the period 2005 to 2014 with respect to morphology, phenology, anatomy, cytology and reproduction, it was assigned a new name. The IUCN status has also been assigned and the identification keys for the genera and species found in India are prepared and presented in this paper.



Materials And Methods


Plant Materials

Specimens of the species under study were collected from Durgawadi Pimparwadi area, Taluk Junnar, district Pune, and for comparison the specimens of Ledebouria were also collected from different locations in Maharashtra state comprising the Western Ghats, Konkan, Pune, Marathwada and Vidarbha regions in subsequent years (Table 1). The plant specimens were observed in their natural habitat as well as under cultivation till date for phenology of the specimens, fruit set, and other characters. The herbarium specimens at Blatter Herbarium (BLAT!), St. Xavier’s College, Mumbai; Agharkar Herbarium Maharashtra Association for Cultivation of Sciences (AHMA!), Agharkar Research Institute, Pune; and Herbarium of Botanical Survey of India, Western Regional Centre (BSI!), Pune were referred to for comparison and confirmation of identity of the collected specimens.






The cytological observations were made using root tips treated with an aqueous solution of Colchicine (0.02%) for one hour to arrest the metaphase in dividing root tip cells and in the separation of chromosomes. The root tips were then fixed using Carnoy’s Fluid II and then squashed and stained with aceto-carmine. The observations were made under a microscope using 100×10 objective to eyepiece magnification (Dnyansagar 1986).

The observations of anatomical characters were made using Lawrence & Mayo Stereo-zoom microscope for micro-morphological characters and Research microscope attached with micro-photographic set up with a Nikon Coolpix 6000 digital camera.

The identification keys for genera and species recorded from India are prepared on the basis of literature, observed characters of specimens and the online herbarium specimens of the Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, England available on the website at herbcat/ (RBG Kew 2015).

For threat status assessment, the number of individuals was recorded at each visit to the location and the geo-coordinates were obtained using hand-held GPS (Garmin etrex vista HCX). The primary and secondary information required as per IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria version 6.2 were collected, following the guidelines for assigning the criteria (Standards and Petitions Working Group IUCN 2006).








The present study leads to the identification of the specimens as S. viridis Blatt. & Hallb. nom. illeg., which could not be used. As per the current taxonomy, the species fits in the genus Ledebouria Roth and should be named accordingly. The epithet ‘viridis’ also could not be used as per ICBN Article 11.4, therefore, the species is renamed as:



Ledebouria junnarensis

S.S. Rahangdale & S.R. Rahangdale, nom. nov.



Replaced synonyms

Scilla viridis Blatt. & Hallb. in J. Indian Bot. 2: 52 (1921), nom. illeg.;

Ledebouria viridis (Blatt. & Hall.) S. Dutta & P. Harvey in Almeida, Fl. Mah. 5A: 187 (2009) nom. illeg.;

non. Scilla viridis (L.) Salisbury in Prodr. Stirp. Chap. Allerton 243 (1796). Deb & Dasgupta in Bull. Bot. Surv. India 14: 45. (1975) 1978 & Fasc. Fl. India 7: 15 (1981); Karthikeyan et al. in Florae Ind. Enum. Monocot. Flora India ser. 4: 101. (1989); Sharma et al., in Fl. Mah. State, Monocot. 40-41. (1996); Mishra & Singh in End. Threat. Fl. Pl. Mah. 240-241. (2001).



Holotype: 14500 (BLAT!), September 1918, Khandala, Pune District, Maharashtra, India, 1800’N & 73023’E, elevation 536m, coll. McCann.

Paratypes: 22190, 22191 (AHMA!),, Durgawadi, Junnar Taluk, Pune District, Maharashtra, India, 19011’42.10”N & 73043’43.69”E, 990m, coll. S.B. Nagarkar (now S.S. Rahangdale); 235, 236, 237, 238 (Herbarium of B.J. College, Ale),, Inglun Ghat (Durgawadi), Junnar Taluk, 19011’42.10”N & 73043’43.69”E, 1068m, coll. S.S. Rahangdale.






Etymology of the epithet

The epithet ‘junnarensis’ is derived from the locality of the present specimens, falling under the tehsil Junnar in Pune District, Maharashtra State, India. The re-collection of specimens from the original location Khandala was unfruitful and considered to be extirpated from there.



Perennial bulbous scapigerous herbs. Bulb without bulblets, tunicate, tunic brown, lustrous on inner side, ca. 4.2 × 2.5 cm, ovoid, solid; roots arising from the basal disc of bulb, roots thick, branched. Bulb scales of three vegetation periods with one scape per year, imbricate, 2 in one ring. Leaves radical, thickened in the middle, without conspicuous veins, 3–4 in number in one vegetative period, hysteranthous, ca. 14–45×1.5–2.1 cm, length increases after flowering, linear; canaliculate towards tip, apex acute with blunt, fleshy, pink tip; leaves pinkish-green when young, fully develop after flowering, spots on lamina vinaceous, disappear at maturity; the leaf tip always produces one or rarely two bulbils maturing into a plantlet at the completion of the vegetation period (Image 1). Scape single from each bulb, ca. 18–40cm long, pinkish-purple when young, erect, glabrous. Inflorescence lax raceme, from upper half of scape, 15–30 flowered. Flowers purplish-green, 0.8–1.2 cm in diameter, stellate, on 1.0–1.5 cm long pedicels with two unequal bracts of ca. 0.1–0.2 cm long, glabrous. Perianth reflexed, tepals 6, purplish, ca. 0.5cm long each with a single prominent green vein, perigone forming very short tube at base. Stamens 6, epitepalous, outer 3 longer than inner; filaments dark pink to purple, glabrous, anthers purple, small, oblong, dorsifixed, pollen grains yellow. Ovary tricarpellary, stipitate, forming a dome, trilocular, subtrigonous, green, style ± equal to the length of filament, purple, ovules 2 or 3 in each locule on axile placenta, ovules not side by side. Fruit set rarely. Perianth persistent at fruiting. Seeds ellipsoidal, dark brown, shiny with polygonal reticulation on testa.






Plants emerge after the pre-monsoon showers as inflorescence and 2 or 3 leaves in the month of May–June. The leaves grow very fast after the flowering and attain a length of 30–45 cm. Fruits develop and mature in June-July, but the number of mature fruits per plant is very low (about 1–3 fruits). The same flowering period has been observed for the specimens under cultivation. The plants remain dormant from September to mid May in the form of underground bulbs.



The population occurs on strong slopes of well-aerated deep soil rich in humus accumulated from grass biomass. The habitat is shared by other ephemerals, viz.: Chlorophytum tuberosum Baker, Crinum latifolium L. var. latifolium, Cyanotis tuberosa (Roxb.) J.A. & J.H. Schult., Euphorbia fusiformis Buch-Ham. ex D. Don, Habenaria grandifloriformis Blatt. & McCann, and Iphigenia magnifica Ansari & Rolla Rao and Iphigenia pallida Baker. The average annual rainfall is about 200–250 cm with a cool climate from June to October, and misty climate with saturation of relative humidity from July to September. The annual air temperature ranges between 150C and 360C.



The mitotic metaphase cell plates of root tip squash revealed that the cells contain 2n=70 chromosomes. This chromosome number is the highest and not yet reported from any of the Ledebouria species (Image 2).


Leaf Anatomy

The leaf anatomy revealed that the margin of the leaf is single cell in cross section. Epidermal cells are rectangular on both the surfaces. Leaves are amphistomatic; stomata paracytic with two small reniform subsidiary cells parallel to both the guard cells (Image 2). Cataphyll cells contain acicular silica crystals and ellipsoidal starch grains with concentric striations.


Diagnostic characters

Bulb tunicate, scales imbricate, scales of three vegetation period, silica crystals in cells of scale leaves acicular, starch grains ellipsoidal with concentric striations. Leaves hysteranthous, linear, canaliculate towards tip, margin ending in single cell thickness. Leaves amphistomatic, stomata paracytic with two distinct subsidiary cells. The scape is a single per vegetation period, inflorescence lax raceme, ca. 30 flowered, pedicels relatively longer than that in L. revoluta, bracts two minute, deltoid, flowers pink-purple, perianth purplish with green midrib, reflexed, ovary stipitate, green, trilocular, 3 lobed, 2 or 3 ovules per locule, on axile placenta, bulbils at the leaf tip fleshy, producing plantlets.


Identification keys

For the identification of genera and species found in India the genus and species keys are prepared using the literature and characters of specimens studied.







The species is confirmed on the basis of morphological, anatomical, and cytological characters. A comparison in the characteristics of this species with other three species reported from India is given in Table 2. The leaves in Ledebouria junnarensis nom. nov. are 2 or 3 per vegetation period, linear, canaliculate with fleshy tip always producing bulbils and plantlets, upto 45cm long, scape single, inflorescence lax raceme, bracts two, ovary forming a dome, placenta axile, 2 or 3 ovules in each locule, chromosomes 2n=70, smaller silica crystals and ellipsoidal starch grains with concentric striations. L. revoluta has larger silica crystals and irregularly shaped large starch grains without concentric striations. The epidermal cells and stomata are larger than that of L. revoluta, therefore, stomatal density is relatively less in the species under study. The stomatal index is also less. Floral parts, viz., scale, pedicel, perianth and stamens are pink/purple in L. junnarensis, whereas they are pale greenish-pink in L. revoluta. The flowers are smaller in later species.



The mitotic metaphase cell plates of root tip squash revealed that the plants contain 2n=70 chromosomes. This chromosome number is the highest and not yet reported from any of the Ledebouria species. Rao (1956) had identified three cytological variables - diploids, triploids and tetraploids of L. revoluta (S. indica) populations into two natural morphological groups. One morphological group comprises diploids (2n=30) and tetraploids (2n=60); while the other morphological group of triploids (2n=45). Unfortunately, detailed morphological characterization is not clear for triploid as well as the tetraploid forms. More importantly, the triploid form studied by him was collected from the Coromandel Coast from Machilipatanam (in Andhra Pradesh) to Chennai (Madras) while, prevalence of diploids and tetraploid forms is in Maharashtra, particularly in the Mumbai area (Rao 1956). Though the triploid form of L. revoluta, which has linear leaves and without or very rarely with seed set, is different in chromosome number, i.e., 2n=45 when compared to L. junnarensis nom. nov. A specimen at Kew - K000802739 collected by Wight in October 1835 from Tamil Nadu, India (RBG Kew 2015) had long linear leaves without scape and bulbils which might be a triploid form of L. revoluta. Comparison of the cytological evidences and present observations of the cytology strongly suggest that the specimen under study is a distinct species and not the triploid form of L. revoluta. The chromosomes recorded here are 2n=70; are first observations and the highest known 2n chromosome number in the genus. Speta (1998a) reported that the genus Ledebouria has species with chromosome numbers 2n=20, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 36, 44, 45, 46, 54, 58, 60, and 66. The observations of the present study also confirm a larger number of metaphase chromosomes in the genus, further supporting the distinctiveness of the taxon. L. junnarensis also shows affinities with F. hohenackeri which has linear leaves and axile placentation; however they differ in having a dome shaped, stipitate, green ovary and stellate non-blue flowers with cup shaped perigone and the chromosome number is also different; 2n=10 in later species (Rao 1954).






During the present study, the flowering is observed from May to June and later fruiting has been recorded. The same flowering & fruiting period has been observed for the specimens under cultivation. The flowering period reported in the literature as March (Blatter & Hallberg 1921; Santapau 1958; Deb & Dasgupta 1975, 1981) and from September to March (Sharma et al. 1996; Mishra & Singh 2001) is found to be dubious as later workers referred to the type specimen, which was reported to flower in March. Moreover, the plants are monsoon ephemeral and become dormant by September. The flowering in the month of March reported for the type specimen may be due to drying up after collection and then warm weather with watering can induce flowering due to breaking of the dormancy of the bulb. A similar phenomenon was also observed in a plant under cultivation.



IUCN Assessment


The present location is on the hill slopes of the Sahyadri in the northern Western Ghats, in Pune District. The Pimparwadi-Inglun Ghat (Durgawadi), is the location of the single present population of the species. The geographic position of the location is 19011’42.10”N & 73043’43.69”E, with an elevation range of 990–1095 m. The present population is of about 680 individuals (in 2013) in a very small area (AOO) of 0.52km2 (Image 3) along the grassy hill slope between 990–1095 m in association with Chlorophytum tuberosum Baker, Crinum latifolium L. var. latifolium, Cyanotis tuberosa (Roxb.) J.A. & J.H. Schult., Euphorbia fusiformis Buch-Ham. ex D. Don, Habenaria grandifloriformis Blatt. & McCann, Iphigenia magnifica Ansari & Rolla Rao and Iphigenia pallida Baker. The species has been recorded for the first time from the region. Extensive surveys by the authors from 2005 to 2014 comprising Maharashtra State including the Western Ghats, especially Pune District and type Locality ‘Khandala’ did not result in the observation of specimens similar to the present one. The population is more or less stable and maintained by the plantlet formation by bulbils and rarely by seeds.

The present locality is a steep slope and surrounded by privately owned lands on the upper plateau as well as the lower slope. Landslides due to tree felling, and heavy grazing are the major threats. The major population is along the cut edges of the road approaching Durgawadi Plateau, and road widening is a major threat to the population. Thus, deterioration of the habitat is a critical problem to the present population of the species.

On communication with local people, it came to light that the plant is not presently being used for any purpose. As locals do not find any application, they are not interested in conservation of the plant at present. As the plants are amidst the grasses, grazing by goats and cattle cause elimination of terminal bulbils, which are a major means of multiplication. Therefore, grazing is also one of the most potent causes of destruction of the population.

The type locality ‘Khandala’ around 1800’N & 73023’E and with an elevation of about 536m is situated about 60km away towards the southwest of the present location. Repeated attempts by taxonomists in the past and by the present authors to re-collect the species from the type locality have been unsuccessful. While working for about 12 years from 1940 to 1951 on the Flora of Khandala, Santapau was unable to collect any specimen of the species and reported it only on the authority of first description (Santapau 1958), and the same was followed by subsequent researchers (Deb & Dasgupta 1981; Nayar & Sastry 1987; Karthikeyan et al. 1989; Sharma et al. 1996). Based on these reports the taxon was declared as ‘possibly extinct’. Thus, it is clear that, one location is lost forever. The AOO of this location is not known.

An important reason behind the elimination of plants from their type location may be rapid anthropogenic developmental activities that took place at the hill station ‘Khandala’. To understand this, one must consider the following facts: (i) the year of reporting of the specimen is 1921; (ii) the first attempt to re-collect the specimen by Santapau, from 1940 to 1951 was about 30 years after the first description; (iii) another 30 or more years are taken for subsequent unfruitful attempts to re-collect the specimen by other taxonomists; and (iv) very rapid developmental activities and construction of farm houses and residential complexes. The present situation is that there is hardly any space for natural populations of plants in the hill town and the slopes of the valleys are almost unapproachable.

Information collected during this study indicates that L. junnarensis nom. nov. fulfils the necessary criteria to place it in the ‘Critically Endangered’ category (IUCN 2015) as it faces a high risk of extinction. The EOO is approximately 60km2 considering its type locality and the new locality under present study. It is very important that, specimens could not be found at the type locality, thus the original location is lost for the taxon. This fact has reduced the EOO to almost 50% or more. Even if both the locations are considered for EOO, it is less than 100km2 and the species satisfies the condition B1.

The AOO of the taxon at the present location is about 0.52km2, which is far less than 10km2. Considering the lost population at type location there is sure reduction in the AOO also. Therefore it satisfies condition B2a.

The EOO and AOO have declined and the quality of habitat is showing a continuous decline. These facts satisfy the criteria for the categorization of the taxon as Critical Endangered (CR) under criterion B of IUCN.

It is evident from the literature that the species was spread over a larger area but now reduced to only one location. This location also has a small population of <1000 individuals. The emphasis should also be given to the mode of reproduction through bulbils at the tip of each leaf. A single plantlet results from each bulbil. Considering the average leaves per vegetation period 3–4 (av. 3.5) each plant can produce 3.5 plantlets per vegetation period. But this is not actually observed; instead the population shows more or less a stable number of individuals. The main reason behind this phenomenon is the grazing by cattle, which eliminate leaf bulbils while grazing and the plantlets could not be produced.

The present population of the species is subjected to heavy grazing, trampling by grazers and cattle. The threat of road widening and landslides are added ones. The lack of dispersal of plantlets due to the mode of reproduction is very important and also a threat to the species. The locals are unaware about the species and so are not interested in conserving it in the absence of any usage value to it. It is also noted by the authors that the visitors from neighbouring areas are increasing yearly for pilgrimage and tourist activities at Durgawadi Plateau. The transport facilities are likely to be improved in the very near future, which is primarily in the form of road widening. Thus, the fate of the species is unknown.

The above measured and quantified facts and observations clearly indicate that the species fulfils both the conditions B1 & B2 of Criterion B to qualify for CR category. Therefore, the status of Ledebouria junnarensis S.S. Rahangdale & S.R. Rahangdale is assigned as Critically Endangered B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii) with justification (Appendix 1).








The taxon which was declared as ‘possibly extinct’ after unfruitful attempts to re-collect it from its type location and other locations by several taxonomists has now been rediscovered after about 85 years. The taxon has been studied with respect to vegetative and floral anatomy, cytology and the identity has been confirmed. The taxon is assigned to the new name in the present systematics framework as, Ledebouria junnarensis S.S. Rahangdale & S.R. Rahangdale nom. nov.

It is also evaluated for threat status as per IUCN criteria and guidelines Version 6.2 and categorized as ‘Critically Endangered’ vide condition B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii). The population at the type location is lost due to anthropogenic activities and the present location is supporting the only surviving population of the species. This location is also under threat of grazing, habitat degradation, landslide and road widening, beside the propagation restriction of formation of plantlets from the leaf tip bulbil and very rarely through seeds. Therefore, in situ, as well as ex situ conservation measures should be prioritized. It can be introduced in other similar and safer habitats in the Western Ghats after evaluation as per the guidelines of the IUCN Reintroduction Specialist Group. It is evident from the experience of authors that the plant thrives well under pot/bed cultivation and also multiplies. It is a beautiful ephemeral whose purple/pink flowers and blotched leaves have an ornamental potential. Therefore, ex situ conservation is also possible.





Almeida, M.R. (2009). Flora of Maharashtra. Vol. 5A. Blatter Herbarium, St. Xavier’s College, Mumbai, 187–188pp.

Baker, J.G. (1870). Monograph of Scilla: Sections Ledebouria and Drimiopsis. Saunders Refugium Botanicum 3: tt.180-184; Append.: 1–18.

Blatter, E. & F. Hallberg (1921). Species Novae Indiae Orientalis. Journal of Indian Botany 2: 52–53.

Cooke, T. (1958). (Reprint) The Flora of the Presidency of Bombay, Vol. 3. Government of India, 276pp.

Dnyansagar, V.R. (1986). Cytology and Genetics. Tata Mc Graw Hill, New Delhi, 148–163pp.

Deb, D.B. & S. Dasgupta (1975). Revision of the genus Scilla in India (Liliaceae). Bulletin of Botanical Survey of India 17(1–4): 41–50.

Deb, D.B. & S. Dasgupta (1981). Liliaceae: Tribe – Scilleae, pp. 1–23. In: Fascicles of Flora of India 7. Botanical Survey of India, Howrah.

Govaerts, R. (2013). World checklist of Asparagaceae. Facilitated by Royal Botanical Garden, Kew published on the internet http:/ (assessed: 19 March 2015).

Hooker, J.D. (1892). The Flora of British India, Vol. 6. L. Reeve & Co. London, 328pp.

IPNI (2015). (accessed: 22 June 2015, 03 January 2016).

IUCN (2015). (accessed: 19 March 2015).

Jessop, J.P. (1970). Studies in the bulbous Liliaceae in South Africa: 1. Scilla, Schizocarpus and Ledebouria. Journal of South African Botany 36(4): 233–266.

Karthikeyan, S., S.K. Jain, M.P. Nayar & M. Sanjappa (eds.) (1989). Florae Indicae Enumeratio: Monocotyledonae. Flora India Ser. 4. Botanical Survey of India, Calcutta, 435pp.

Lebatha, P., M.H. Buys & B. Stedje (2006). Ledebouria, Resnovaand Drimiopsis: a tale of three genera. Taxon 55(3): 643–652.

Lenski, I. (1958). Uber die Brutzwiebelbildung auf den Blattern von Drimiopsis kirkii Bak. Planta 50: 579–621. (as cited by Speta, 1998a).

McNeil, J., F.R. Barrie, W.R. Buck, V. Demoulin, W. Greuter, D.L. Hawksworth, P.S. Herendeed, S. Knapp, K. Marhold, J. Prado, W.F. Prud’homme van Reine, G.F. Smith, J.H. Wiersema & N.J. Turland (2012). International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Melbourne Code). Regnum Vegetabile 154. (Koeltz Scientific Book’s, Königstein).

Mishra, D.K. & N.P. Singh (2001). Endemic and Threatened Flowering Plants of Maharashtra. Botanical Survey of India, Howrah, 240–241pp.

Nayar, M.P. & A.R.K. Sastry (eds.) (1987). Red Data Book of Indian Plants - Vol. 1. Botanical Survey of India, Calcutta, 118pp.

Pfosser, M. & F. Speta (1999). Phylogenetics of Hyacinthaceae based on plastid DNA sequences. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 86(1): 852–875.

Rahangdale, S.S. (2008). Floristic study of taluka Junnar, District Pune, Maharashtra with special reference to effect of developmental activities. PhD Thesis, University of Pune, Pune, xi+601pp.

Ramana, M.V., P.V. Prasanna & P. Venu (2012). Ledebouria hyderabadensis (Hyacinthaceae), a new species from India. Kew Bulletin 67: 561–564.

Rao, Y.S. (1954). Chromosomes of Scilla hohenackeri Fisch. & Mey. Current Science 23(3): 94–95.

Rao, Y.S. (1956). Scilla Indica in India. Current Science 25(5):164–165.

Roth, A.W. (1821). Novae plantarum Species. Sumtibus H. Vogleri, Halberstadii, 195pp.

Royal Botanic Gardens (2015). at herbcat/ (Accessed on 09 July 2015).

Santapau, H. (1958). The Flora of Khandala on Western Ghats of India. The Government of India, Manager of Publication, Civil lines, Delhi, 252pp.

Sharma, B.D., S. Karthikeyan & N.P. Singh (eds.) (1996). Flora of Maharashtra State, Monocotyledons. Botanical Survey of India, Calcutta, 140–141pp.

Speta, F. (1998a). Hyacinthaceae, pp. 261–285. In: Kubitzki, K. (ed.). The Families and Genera of Vascular PlantsVol. 3. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

Speta, F. (1998b). Systematische Analyse der Gattung Scilla L. (Hyacinthaceae). Phyton (Austria) Band 38: 1–141.

Standards and Petitions Working Group (2006). Guidelines for using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Version 6.2. Prepared by Standards and Petitions Working Group of the IUCN SSC Biodiversity Assessments Sub-Committee in December 2006. Available from RedListGuidelines.pdf.

Stedje, B. (2001). Generic delimitation of Hyacinthaceae with special reference emphasis on sub-Saharan genera. Systematics & Geography of Plants 71(2): 449–454.

The Plant List (2015). (Accessed on 22 June 2015, 03 January 2016).

Venter, S. (2008). Synopsis of the genus Ledebouria Roth (Hyacinthaceae) in South Africa. Herbertia 62: 85–155.