Some hydroids (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Hydroidolina)
from the Konkan coast, Maharashtra, India
Pooja Nagale1 & Deepak Apte 2
1,2 Bombay Natural History
Society, Hornbill House, Opp. Lion Gate, Dr. SalimAli Chowk, Shaheed Bhagat Singh Road, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400001, India
1 poojanagale@gmail.com (corresponding author), 2 spiderconch@gmail.com
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.o3484.4814-8 | ZooBank:urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4388D472-ACC4-41CF-AA73-AE391B160289
Editor: Ferdinando Boero, Università del Salento, Lecce, Italy Dateof publication: 26 September 2013 (online & print)
Manuscript details: Ms #
o3484 | Received 14 January 2013 | Final received 02 July 2013 | Finally
accepted 16 August 2013
Citation: Nagale,
P. & D. Apte (2013). Some
hydroids (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Hydroidolina)
from the Konkan coast, Maharashtra, India. Journal
of Threatened Taxa 5(13): 4814–4818; http://dx.doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.o3484.4814-8
Copyright: © Nagale& Apte 2013. Creative Commons
Attribution 3.0 Unported License. JoTT allows unrestricted use of this article in any medium,
reproduction and distribution by providing adequate credit to the authors and
the source of publication.
Funding: None.
Competing Interest: Authors
declare no competing interest.
Acknowledgements: We
are grateful to Mr. Vishal Bhave and Ms. Amruta Prasade for invaluable
assistance and contributions in curating the collections. Thanks are also due
to Mr. Vishwas Shinde and
Mr. Rajendra Pawar for help
in the field. We acknowledge the Director of the Bombay Natural History Society
for support and encouragement of our studies.
For images, table -- click here
Hydroids from intertidal
regions on the coast of India have received only modest attention. The eminent Indian hydrozoan taxonomist
T.A. Mammen (1963, 1965a,b) recorded and described a
number of shallow-water species from southern India. Venugopalan& Wagh (1986, 1990) recorded a few fouling
hydroids from Mumbai harbor, including the predominantly intertidal sertulariid Dynamena crisioides. In Maharashtra State Gazetteers (1974–1975), only Pennaria distichaand Ectopleura viridis(as Tubularia pacifica)
were reported, both with minimal information, and more detailed descriptions of
them are warranted. Finally,
several intertidal hydroid species were recorded from Okhamandal,
in the state of Gujarat (Thornely 1916).
Intertidal hydroids of the Konkan coast have been neglected, although the region has
ample intertidal habitat and moderate faunal diversity. Objectives of the present paper were to
explore the benthic hydrozoan fauna of Konkan, and to
provide some details of their morphological characters.
Taxonomic and morphological
studies were undertaken to identify the various hydroid colonies that were
collected. Eight species, collected
from eight different sampling sites (Table 1), are reported herein. These are referable to the anthoathecate families Pennariidae(1 species) and Tubulariidae (1 species), and to the leptothecate families Aglaopheniidae(1 species), Sertulariidae (4 species), and Campanulariidae (1 species).
Our study was undertaken on
the rocky shores of the Konkan coast, Maharashtra, a
region facing the Arabian Sea on the western coastline of India. Hydroids were collected from Ratnagiri (Mandavi, Mirya, Aare Ware, Undi, Purngad), Rajapur (Ambolgad, Kasheli) and Vijaydurga (Image 1). Specimens were collected manually, during low tide, from rock pools and
rock crevices. Identification of
species was based on morphological characters of hydroid, like colony form,
arrangement of hydrocladia and hydrotheca,
polyp morphology and gonophore. Most were preserved directly in 4% formalin in sea
water for further study, while some were studied alive. Collections were
examined microscopically using a stereoscope (Leica EZ4 D) and a compound
microscope (Leica DM750). Drawings
and photomicrographs prepared in the laboratory were also used in establishing
morphological characters of the hydroids. All specimens were deposited in the collections of the Bombay Natural
History Society (BNHS), Maharashtra.
Family: Pennariidae McCrady, 1859
Pennaria disticha Goldfuss,
1820
Material studied: size
2–20 cm, BNHS-HY-0047, BNHS-HY-0084, BNHS-0095, BNHS-HY-0096 (Images 2
A–C).
Substrate: Rocks; colonies
also observed encrusting sponges.
Colony characters: Colony
erect, pinnate, arising from a creeping hydrorhiza. Hydrocaulusbranched (Image 2B), with alternate hydrocladia; hydrocladia and hydranth pedicels annulated basally;
Hydranths pear-shaped, with a proximal whorl of 8–10 filiformtentacles (Image 2C) and distal whorls of shorter capitatetentacles; Medusa buds present on some colonies (Image 2C).
Known distribution from
India: Pamban and Neendakara(Mammen 1963)
Family: Tubulariidae Goldfuss, 1818
Ectopleura viridis (Pictet, 1893)
Material studied: size
1–4 cm, BNHS-HY-0036, BNHS-HY-0042, BNHS-HY-0093, (Image 2 D–F).
Substrate: Rockpool; rock crevices, encrusting sponges.
Colony characters: Hydroids
growing in clusters (Image 2D); hydrocaulus unbranched, long, tubular (Image 2E). Hydranths vasiform, with single whorl of
10–16 aboral filiformtentacles and single whorl of 15–18 oral tentacles. Medusa buds (7 fertile hydranths)
present at base of aboral tentacles (Image 2
E–F).
Known distribution from
India: Neendakara, Thankasseryand Madras harbor (Mammen 1963) and Pamban (Gravely 1927).
Family: Aglaopheniidae Marktanner-Turneretscher, 1890
Macrorhynchia philippina Kirchenpauer,
1872
Material studied: size up to
6cm, BNHS-HY-0035, BNHS-HY-0081, BNHS-HY-0113, (Image 2 G-I).
Substrate: Rockpool, in a shaded area.
Colony characters: Colony
erect, pinnate, with some colonies multipinnate. Hydrocaulus branched, with alternate, unbranched hydrocladia (Image 2H). Hydrothecae borne on upper surface of hydrocladia,
with up to 17 per hydrocladium. Hydrothecae sac-shaped (Image 2 I). Hydranths with
8–10 tentacles. Other
characters of the hydroid correspond with material described by Schuchert (2003).
Known distribution from
India: Pamban (Mammen1965b; Gravely 1927), Andaman (Ritchie 1910) and Adatra(Thornely 1916).
Family: Sertulariidae Lamouroux, 1812
Dynamena crisioides Lamouroux, 1824
Material studied: size
8–25 mm, BNHS-HY-0067, BNHS-HY-0071, (Image 3 A–C).
Substrate: Shaded rocky
areas, including rock crevices and overhangs in rockpools.
Colony characters: Hydrocladial arrangement alternate (Image 3A); hydrothecae subopposite, tubular,
slender, facing outwards, margin with three cusps (Image 3C); operculum of two
flaps closing orifice. Gonothecae vase-shaped, attached to base of hydrothecae (Image 3B). Orifice of gonotheca circular, with flat operculum.
Known distribution from
India: Krusadai Island, south coast (Mammen 1965a), Mumbai (Venugopalan& Wagh 1986)
Dynamena sp.
Material studied: size
2–5 mm, BNHS-HY-0069, (Image 3 D-F).
Substrate: Brown algae (Sargassum sp.).
Colony characters: Hydroid
colony epiphytic, growing on both sides of algal thallus(Image 3D). Hydrocauluserect, monosiphonic, arising from a stolonal hydrorhiza. Hydrothecaeopposite (Image 3E); hydrothecal pairs adnate, with orifice opening outwards. Hydranth
retracted (Image 3F). Gonothecae absent.
Known distribution from
India: Not yet known.
Dynamena quadridentata (Ellis
& Solander, 1786)
Material studied: size
1.5–5 mm, BNHS-HY-0083, (Image 3 G-I).
Substrate: Epiphytic on green
algae (possibly Ulva sp.) and red algae (Gracilaria sp.).
Colony characters: Colony unbranched, creeping on algae (Image 3G). Each hydrocaulus with 3–4 pairs of hydrothecae(Image 3H). Number of hydrothecal pairs differing from base to tip, with
1–4 sequentially. Other characters similar to
description of Mammen (1965a). Gonothecae vase- or barrel-shaped, with annulations, arising from hydrocaulus at base of first pair of hydrothecae. Orifice of gonotheca round, with
single, flat operculum (Image 3I).
Known distribution from
India: Gulf of Mannar, Thankassery,
Cape Comorin and Kovilam (Mammen1965a)
Idiellana pristis (Lamouroux,
1816)
Material studied: size up to
6cm, BNHS-HY-0018, BNHS-HY-0019, BNHS-HY-0066, BNHS-HY-0082, BNHS-HY-0090,
(Image 4 A–C).
Substrate: Rock, sometimes
encrusting sponges.
Colony characters: Colony
erect, pinnate. Hydrocaulus monosiphonic, arising from creeping hydrorhiza. Hydrocladia unbranched, alternately arranged (Image 4A). Hydrothecaetubular, curved outwards; alternate and adjoining to
each other (Image 4B). Female gonothecae present; urn-shaped; onhydrocaulus and hydrocladia(Image 4C).
Known distribution from
India: Gulf of Mannar (Mammen1965a), Konkan coast (Armstrong 1879), Dwarka and Poshitra (Thornely 1916)
Family: CampanulariidaeJohnston, 1836
Obelia geniculata (Linnaeus, 1758)
Material studied: size
4–10 mm, BNHS-HY-0153, (Image 4 D–F).
Substrate: Rock with sand;
also creeping on green algae.
Colony characters: Colony erect, branched or unbranched;
arising from a creeping stolon. Hydrocaulus zigzag (geniculate) in form (Image 4E). Internodes annulated proximally. Hydrothecaebell-shaped; margin entire (uncusped) (Image 4F).
Known distribution from
India: No specific reference found for locality.
The present study is
noteworthy in that five species are recorded for the first time from
Maharashtra. Moreover, all eight
species reported herein constitute new records for the Konkancoast. Hydroids were well-represented at every site except Vijaydurga. Dynamenasp. requires more study because of the absence of gonothecaein our specimens. It was assigned
to sertulariid genus on the basis of hydrothecal arrangement and structure. Pennaria disticha and Dynamena crisioides were the most common species at sites
along the coast. Although P. disticha and Ectopleura viridis were reported in the state faunal series,
Gazetteer of Maharashtra, we provide a more detailed description and have added
specific collection locales. All
species collected here are from rocky shores and there is a need to further
explore these habitats.
REFERENCES
Gravely,
F.H. (1927). The littoral fauna of Krusadai island in the Gulf of Manaar.
Hydrozoa. Bulletin of Madras Government, Museum of Natural
History Society 1: 7–20.
Maharashtra
State Gazetteers (1974–1975). General series: Fauna. The Director, Government Printing,
Stationary, Maharashtra State, Bombay, (175–176) 707pp+5pls.
Mammen, T.A. (1963). On a
collection of hydroids from South India. I. Suborder Athecata.Journal of the Marine Biological Association of India 5(1):
27–61.
Mammen, T.A. (1965a). On a collection of hydroids from South India. II. Suborder Thecata (excluding family Plumulariidae).Journal of the Marine Biological Association of India7: 1–57.
Mammen, T.A. (1965b). On a collection of hydroids from South India. III. Suborder Thecata (family Plumulariidae). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of India 7(2):
291–324.
Ritchie, J. (1910). The
hydroids of the Indian museum. Records of Indian museum (Calcutta) (5):
1–30.
Schuchert, P. (2003). Hydroids (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa) of the Danish
expedition to the Kei Islands. Steenstrupia 27(2): 137–256.
Thornely, L.R. (1916). Report on the hydroida collected by Mr. James Hornell at Okhamandal in Kattiawar in
1905–6, pp. 147–150. In: Hornell J. (ed.). Report to the Government
of Baroda on the marine zoology of Okhamandal in Kattiawar, Part II. Williams & Northgate, London.
Venugopalan, V.P.
& A.B. Wagh (1986). A note on
the fouling hydroids from the offshore waters of Bombay. Mahasagar-Bulletin of National Institute of Oceanography 19(4): 275–277.